pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25615 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · 🪐 quant-ph

Near-identical photons from distant quantum dot-cavity devices

Thibaut Pollet , Victor Guilloux , Duc-Duy Tran , Anton Pishchagin , Stephen Wein , Joseph A. Sulpizio , William Hease , Petr Stepanov
show 8 more authors
Petr Steindl Nico Margaria Samuel Mister Martina Morassi Aristide Lema\^itre Thi Huong Au S\'ebastien Boissier Pascale Senellart
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 16:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum dotssingle-photon sourcesphoton indistinguishabilitytwo-photon interferenceoptical cavitiesspectral tuningquantum opticsnanofabrication
0
0 comments X

The pith

Distant quantum dot-cavity devices emit photons with 88% two-photon indistinguishability that matches each source's own limit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that photons from two separate quantum dot-cavity devices can reach 88 percent two-photon indistinguishability. This performance equals the upper limit set by the intrinsic behavior of photons emitted one after another from each individual device. The result rests on fabricating many devices that exhibit ultra-low spectral noise and small wavelength differences, then applying two tuning mechanisms to align their emission spectra precisely. A sympathetic reader would care because this removes the longstanding barrier that prevented independent sources from contributing to large-scale interference experiments.

Core claim

We report the nanofabrication of a large number of quantum dot-cavity sources with ultra-low spectral noise and wavelength dispersion. The high source efficiency and the use of two tuning mechanisms enable precise optimization of the spectral overlap between distant sources. With this approach, we demonstrate a two-photon indistinguishability of 88±1 % between photons emitted from two distant sources. This value reaches the upper bound set by the intrinsic indistinguishability of photons emitted successively by each source.

What carries the argument

Quantum dot-cavity sources with ultra-low spectral noise and wavelength dispersion, combined with two tuning mechanisms for spectral overlap optimization.

If this is right

  • Interference experiments can now incorporate photons from multiple independent cavity-based sources without the previous matching limitation.
  • The performance ceiling for multi-source setups is now set by the intrinsic properties of each individual source rather than by inter-source mismatch.
  • Trains of near-identical photons can be generated and interfered across distant devices on microsecond timescales.
  • Optical quantum technologies that rely on large numbers of indistinguishable photons become more feasible to scale.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The dual-tuning approach could be tested for maintaining spectral match under varying temperature or electric-field conditions during extended operation.
  • If the low-noise fabrication process proves repeatable across wafers, it would support experiments that interfere photons from more than two sources.
  • The result shifts attention toward improving single-source metrics such as brightness and collection efficiency as the next bottleneck.

Load-bearing premise

The two sources must remain in uncorrelated environments and the tuning mechanisms must not introduce additional spectral noise or artificial correlations that inflate the measured indistinguishability.

What would settle it

A measurement in which the two-source two-photon indistinguishability exceeds the bound calculated from separate single-source successive-photon indistinguishability measurements on each device would show that external factors are contributing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25615 by Anton Pishchagin, Aristide Lema\^itre, Duc-Duy Tran, Joseph A. Sulpizio, Martina Morassi, Nico Margaria, Pascale Senellart, Petr Steindl, Petr Stepanov, Samuel Mister, S\'ebastien Boissier, Stephen Wein, Thibaut Pollet, Thi Huong Au, Victor Guilloux, William Hease.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: ). Fig. 1b shows the cavity wavelength distribution of 75 micropillars from the sample used in this work. A fit to a normal distribution yields a full width at half maxi￾mum (FWHM) of 94 ± 2 pm, a value that lies within the average cavity mode linewidth (116 pm). The wavelength distribution of the QDs embedded in the micropillars shows a FWHM of 355 pm. This distribution is mostly determined by the spectra… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Scalable optical quantum technologies require interference between large numbers of indistinguishable single-photons emitted by independent sources. Semiconductor quantum dots are known to be excellent on-demand sources of single-photons. They show record efficiency when inserted into optical cavities to control their spontaneous emission and generate trains of near identical photons over microsecond timescales. However, generating perfectly identical photons from distant cavity-based sources has remained a long-standing challenge. It requires precise matching of the emission wavelengths and emission dynamics, while simultaneously minimizing spectral noise across all time scales for distant emitters in uncorrelated environments. Here, we report on the nanofabrication of a large number of quantum dot-cavity sources with ultra-low spectral noise and wavelength dispersion. The high source efficiency and the use of two tuning mechanisms enable precise optimization of the spectral overlap between distant sources. With this approach, we demonstrate a two-photon indistinguishability of $88\pm1$ % between photons emitted from two distant sources. Remarkably, this value reaches the upper bound set by the intrinsic indistinguishability of photons emitted successively by each source. These results represent a key milestone for scaling photon-based quantum technologies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports nanofabrication of multiple quantum dot-cavity single-photon sources exhibiting ultra-low spectral noise and low wavelength dispersion. Using two independent tuning mechanisms to match emission wavelengths and dynamics between distant devices, the authors measure a two-photon indistinguishability of 88±1% via Hong-Ou-Mandel interference, which saturates the intrinsic limit obtained from successive photons emitted by each individual source.

Significance. If the experimental details and error analysis hold, the result is a notable milestone for scalable photonic quantum technologies. It shows that cavity-enhanced quantum-dot sources can produce photons from independent, distant emitters that are as indistinguishable as those from a single source, directly addressing a key barrier to multi-source interference in quantum networks and linear-optical quantum computing.

major comments (1)
  1. [Results] The central claim that the cross-source indistinguishability saturates the intrinsic single-source bound (88±1%) is load-bearing; the manuscript must explicitly report the measured intra-source visibility values, the precise formula converting visibility to indistinguishability, and any post-selection criteria applied to the coincidence data (Results section or Methods).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that a 'large number' of devices were fabricated but provides no statistics on yield, wavelength dispersion across the ensemble, or how many pairs were tested; adding a table or histogram would strengthen the reproducibility claim.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the two tuning mechanisms (wavelength and dynamics) should be defined consistently when first introduced and cross-referenced in the figure captions describing the optimization procedure.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of our work and for the constructive comment on clarifying the supporting measurements and analysis. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript to make the requested details fully explicit.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results] The central claim that the cross-source indistinguishability saturates the intrinsic single-source bound (88±1%) is load-bearing; the manuscript must explicitly report the measured intra-source visibility values, the precise formula converting visibility to indistinguishability, and any post-selection criteria applied to the coincidence data (Results section or Methods).

    Authors: We agree that explicit reporting of these quantities is essential for the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will add, in the Results section, the measured intra-source Hong-Ou-Mandel visibilities obtained from successive photons emitted by each individual source. We will also state the precise conversion formula used, V = (C_max − C_min)/(C_max + C_min) corrected for residual multi-photon events and detector dark counts as described in the Methods. Finally, we will specify the post-selection criteria applied to the coincidence histograms, including the time-gating window and any background subtraction procedure. These additions will be placed directly in the Results section with a cross-reference to the Methods for full technical detail. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct experimental measurement with no derivation chain

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental result: two-photon indistinguishability of 88±1% measured via Hong-Ou-Mandel visibility between photons from two distant quantum-dot cavity sources, shown to match the separately measured intrinsic limit from successive intra-source emissions. No derivation, first-principles prediction, or theoretical chain is claimed. The result follows from direct interference measurements after wavelength/lifetime tuning; it does not reduce to any fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, nor rely on self-citation for load-bearing uniqueness or ansatz. The comparison to the intrinsic bound is a straightforward experimental benchmark, not a self-referential construction. This is a standard empirical report with no circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of quantum optics and semiconductor device physics rather than new postulates. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • wavelength and dynamics tuning parameters
    Two tuning mechanisms are used to match emission properties between sources; exact values are chosen to optimize overlap.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Quantum dots in cavities can be independently tuned without introducing correlated noise when devices are distant
    Invoked when claiming the measured indistinguishability reflects true source matching rather than environmental correlation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5561 in / 1234 out tokens · 58960 ms · 2026-05-07T16:44:54.277099+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Senellart, G

    P. Senellart, G. Solomon, and A. White, High- performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources, Nature Nanotechnology12, 1026 (2017), num- ber: 11

    2017

  2. [2]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

    2008

  3. [3]

    Beccaceci, G

    M. Beccaceci, G. Ronco, F. Cienzo, P. Bassetti, A. Lan- eve, F. B. Basset, T. M. Krieger, Q. Buchinger, F. Salusti, B. S. Damasceno, S. Kuhn, S. F. C. d. Silva, S. Stroj, K. D. Jöns, S. Höfling, T. Huber- Loyola, A. Rastelli, M. B. Rota, and R. Trotta, All- photonic entanglement swapping with remote quantum dots 10.48550/arXiv.2512.10651 (2025)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.10651 2025

  4. [4]

    S. C. Wein, T. Goubault de Brugière, L. Music, P. Senel- lart, B. Bourdoncle, and S. Mansfield, Minimizing Re- sourceOverheadinFusion-BasedQuantumComputation Using Hybrid Spin-Photon Devices, PRX Quantum6, 040362 (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    G. d. Gliniasty, P. Hilaire, P.-E. Emeriau, S. C. Wein, A. Salavrakos, and S. Mansfield, A Spin-Optical Quan- 7 tum Computing Architecture, Quantum8, 1423 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    Dessertaine, B

    T. Dessertaine, B. Bourdoncle, A. Denys, G. d. Glini- asty, P. C. d’Istria, G. Valentí-Rojas, S. Mansfield, and P. Hilaire, Enhanced Fault-tolerance in Photonic Quan- tum Computing: Comparing the Honeycomb Floquet Code and the Surface Code in Tailored Architecture 10.48550/arXiv.2410.07065 (2026)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.07065 2026

  7. [7]

    M. L. Chan, T. J. Bell, L. A. Pettersson, S. X. Chen, P. Yard, A. S. Sørensen, and S. Paesani, Tailoring Fusion- Based Photonic Quantum Computing Schemes to Quan- tum Emitters, PRX Quantum6, 020304 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    M. L. Chan, A. A. Capatos, P. Lodahl, A. S. Sørensen, and S. Paesani, Practical blueprint for low- depth photonic quantum computing with quantum dots 10.48550/arXiv.2507.16152 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.16152 2025

  9. [9]

    Somaschi, V

    N. Somaschi, V. Giesz, L. De Santis, J. C. Loredo, M. P. Almeida, G. Hornecker, S. L. Portalupi, T. Grange, C. Antón, J. Demory, C. Gómez, I. Sagnes, N. D. Lanzillotti-Kimura, A. Lemaítre, A. Auffeves, A. G. White, L. Lanco, and P. Senellart, Near-optimal single- photon sources in the solid state, Nature Photonics10, 340 (2016)

    2016

  10. [10]

    B.-Y. Wang, E. V. Denning, U. M. Gür, C.-Y. Lu, and N. Gregersen, Micropillar single-photon source design for simultaneous near-unity efficiency and indistinguishabil- ity, Physical Review B102, 125301 (2020)

    2020

  11. [11]

    Arcari, I

    M. Arcari, I. Söllner, A. Javadi, S. Lindskov Hansen, S. Mahmoodian, J. Liu, H. Thyrrestrup, E. Lee, J. Song, S.Stobbe,andP.Lodahl,Near-UnityCouplingEfficiency of a Quantum Emitter to a Photonic Crystal Waveguide, Physical Review Letters113, 093603 (2014)

    2014

  12. [12]

    Ding, Y.-P

    X. Ding, Y.-P. Guo, M.-C. Xu, R.-Z. Liu, G.-Y. Zou, J.-Y. Zhao, Z.-X. Ge, Q.-H. Zhang, H.-L. Liu, L.-J. Wang, M.-C. Chen, H. Wang, Y.-M. He, Y.-H. Huo, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, High-efficiency single-photon source above the loss-tolerant threshold for efficient lin- ear optical quantum computing, Nature Photonics19, 387 (2025)

    2025

  13. [13]

    C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou, and L. Mandel, Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by in- terference, Physical Review Letters59, 2044 (1987)

    2044

  14. [14]

    P. Kok, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, T. C. Ralph, J. P. Dowling, and G. J. Milburn, Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits, Reviews of Modern Physics79, 135 (2007)

    2007

  15. [15]

    D. E. Browne and T. Rudolph, Resource-Efficient Linear Optical Quantum Computation, Physical Review Letters 95, 010501 (2005)

    2005

  16. [16]

    Delteil, Z

    A. Delteil, Z. Sun, W.-b. Gao, E. Togan, S. Faelt, and A. Imamoğlu, Generation of heralded entanglement be- tween distant hole spins, Nature Physics12, 218 (2016)

    2016

  17. [17]

    Margaria, F

    N. Margaria, F. Pastier, T. Bennour, M. Billard, E. Ivanov, W. Hease, P. Stepanov, A. F. Adiyatullin, R. Singla, M. Pont, M. Descampeaux, A. Bernard, A. Pishchagin, M. Morassi, A. Lemaître, T. Volz, V. Giesz, N. Somaschi, N. Maring, S. Boissier, T. H. Au, and P. Senellart, Efficient fibre-pigtailed source of indis- tinguishable single photons, Nature Comm...

    2025

  18. [18]

    N. Tomm, A. Javadi, N. O. Antoniadis, D. Najer, M. C. Löbl, A. R. Korsch, R. Schott, S. R. Valentin, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, and R. J. Warburton, A bright and fast source of coherent single photons, Nature Nanotech- nology16, 399 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    L. Zhai, G. N. Nguyen, C. Spinnler, J. Ritzmann, M. C. Löbl, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, A. Javadi, and R. J. War- burton, Quantum interference of identical photons from remote GaAs quantum dots, Nature Nanotechnology17, 829 (2022), number: 8

    2022

  20. [20]

    P. Gold, A. Thoma, S. Maier, S. Reitzenstein, C. Schnei- der, S. Höfling, and M. Kamp, Two-photon interference from remote quantum dots with inhomogeneously broad- ened linewidths, Physical Review B89, 035313 (2014)

    2014

  21. [21]

    Reindl, K

    M. Reindl, K. D. Jöns, D. Huber, C. Schimpf, Y. Huo, V. Zwiller, A. Rastelli, and R. Trotta, Phonon-Assisted Two-Photon Interference from Remote Quantum Emit- ters, Nano Letters17, 4090 (2017)

    2017

  22. [22]

    Thoma, P

    A. Thoma, P. Schnauber, J. Böhm, M. Gschrey, J.-H. Schulze, A. Strittmatter, S. Rodt, T. Heindel, and S. Re- itzenstein, Two-photon interference from remote deter- ministic quantum dot microlenses, Applied Physics Let- ters110, 011104 (2017)

    2017

  23. [23]

    X. You, M. Zheng, S. Chen, R.-Z. Liu, J. Qin, M.-C. Xu, Z.-X. Ge, T.-H. Chung, Y.-K. Qiao, Y.-F. Jiang, H.- S. Zhong, M.-C. Chen, H. Wang, Y.-M. He, X.-P. Xie, H. Li, L.-X. Y. Iii, C. Schneider, J. Yin, T.-Y. Chen, M. Benyoucef, Y.-H. Huo, S. Höfling, Q. Zhang, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Quantum interference with indepen- dent single-photon sources over 300...

    2022

  24. [24]

    Strobel, M

    T. Strobel, M. Vyvlecka, I. Neureuther, T. Bauer, M. Schäfer, S. Kazmaier, N. L. Sharma, R. Joos, J. H. Weber, C. Nawrath, W. Nie, G. Bhayani, C. Hopfmann, C. Becher, P. Michler, and S. L. Por- talupi, Telecom-wavelength quantum teleportation using frequency-converted photons from remote quantum dots, Nature Communications16, 10027 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    Laneve, G

    A. Laneve, G. Ronco, M. Beccaceci, P. Barigelli, F. Salusti, N. Claro-Rodriguez, G. De Pascalis, A. Suprano, L. Chiaudano, E. Schöll, L. Hanschke, T. M. Krieger, Q. Buchinger, S. F. Covre da Silva, J. Neuwirth, S. Stroj, S. Höfling, T. Huber-Loyola, M. A. Usuga Castaneda, G. Carvacho, N. Spagnolo, M. B. Rota, F. Basso Basset, A. Rastelli, F. Sciarrino, K....

    2025

  26. [26]

    M. Pont, S. C. Wein, I. Maillette de Buy Wenniger, V. Guichard, N. Coste, A. Harouri, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes, L. Lanco, N. Belabas, N. Somaschi, S. E. Thomas, and P. Senellart, Indistinguishability of Remote Quantum-Dot-Cavity Single-Photon Sources, Nano Let- ters25, 13979 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    C. F. Wang, A. Badolato, I. Wilson-Rae, P. M. Petroff, E. Hu, J. Urayama, and A. Imamoğlu, Optical proper- ties of single InAs quantum dots in close proximity to surfaces, Applied Physics Letters85, 3423 (2004)

    2004

  28. [28]

    J. Liu, K. Konthasinghe, M. Davanço, J. Lawall, V. Anant, V. Verma, R. Mirin, S. W. Nam, J. D. Song, B. Ma, Z. S. Chen, H. Q. Ni, Z. C. Niu, and K. Srini- vasan, Single Self-Assembled InAsGaA Quantum Dots in Photonic Nanostructures: The Role of Nanofabrication, Physical Review Applied9, 064019 (2018)

    2018

  29. [29]

    Vural, S

    H. Vural, S. L. Portalupi, and P. Michler, Perspective of self-assembled InGaAs quantum-dots for multi-source quantum implementations, Applied Physics Letters117, 030501 (2020). 8

    2020

  30. [30]

    A. V. Kuhlmann, J. Houel, A. Ludwig, L. Greuter, D.Reuter, A.D.Wieck, M.Poggio,andR.J.Warburton, Charge noise and spin noise in a semiconductor quantum device, Nature Physics9, 570 (2013), number: 9

    2013

  31. [31]

    Kambs and C

    B. Kambs and C. Becher, Limitations on the indistin- guishability of photons from remote solid state sources, New Journal of Physics20, 115003 (2018)

    2018

  32. [32]

    Dangel, J

    C. Dangel, J. Schmitt, A. J. Bennett, K. Müller, and J. J. Finley, Two-Photon Interference of Single Photons from Dissimilar Sources, Physical Review Applied18, 054005 (2022)

    2022

  33. [33]

    Pollet et al., Low-noise monolithic semiconductor single-photon source, In preparation

    T. Pollet et al., Low-noise monolithic semiconductor single-photon source, In preparation

  34. [34]

    Matthiesen, M

    C. Matthiesen, M. J. Stanley, M. Hugues, E. Clarke, and M. Atatüre, Full counting statistics of quantum dot res- onance fluorescence, Scientific Reports4, 4911 (2014)

    2014

  35. [35]

    Berthelot, C

    A. Berthelot, C. Voisin, C. Delalande, P. Roussignol, R. Ferreira, and G. Cassabois, From Random Telegraph to Gaussian Stochastic Noises: Decoherence and Spectral Diffusion in a Semiconductor Quantum Dot, Advances in Mathematical Physics2010, 494738 (2010)

    2010

  36. [36]

    Ollivier, I

    H. Ollivier, I. Maillette de Buy Wenniger, S. Thomas, S. C. Wein, A. Harouri, G. Coppola, P. Hilaire, C. Mil- let, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes, O. Krebs, L. Lanco, J. C. Loredo, C. Antón, N. Somaschi, and P. Senellart, Re- producibility of High-Performance Quantum Dot Single- Photon Sources, ACS Photonics7, 1050 (2020)

    2020

  37. [37]

    Dousse, L

    A. Dousse, L. Lanco, J. Suffczyński, E. Semenova, A. Mi- ard, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes, C. Roblin, J. Bloch, and P. Senellart, Controlled Light-Matter Coupling for a Sin- gle Quantum Dot Embedded in a Pillar Microcavity Us- ing Far-Field Optical Lithography, Physical Review Let- ters101, 267404 (2008)

    2008

  38. [38]

    Steindl, J

    P. Steindl, J. Frey, J. Norman, J. Bowers, D. Bouwmeester, and W. Löffler, Cross-Polarization- Extinction Enhancement and Spin-Orbit Coupling of Light for Quantum-Dot Cavity Quantum Electrodynam- ics Spectroscopy, Physical Review Applied19, 064082 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    R. J. Warburton, Single spins in self-assembled quantum dots, Nature Materials12, 483 (2013)

    2013

  40. [40]

    Thomas, M

    S. Thomas, M. Billard, N. Coste, S. Wein, Priya, H. Ol- livier, O. Krebs, L. Tazaïrt, A. Harouri, A. Lemaitre, I. Sagnes, C. Anton, L. Lanco, N. Somaschi, J. Loredo, and P. Senellart, Bright Polarized Single-Photon Source Based on a Linear Dipole, Physical Review Letters126, 233601 (2021)

    2021

  41. [41]

    K. D. Jöns, K. Stensson, M. Reindl, M. Swillo, Y. Huo, V. Zwiller, A. Rastelli, R. Trotta, and G. Björk, Two- photon interference from two blinking quantum emitters, Physical Review B96, 075430 (2017)

    2017

  42. [42]

    J. H. Weber, J. Kettler, H. Vural, M. Müller, J. Maisch, M. Jetter, S. L. Portalupi, and P. Michler, Overcoming correlation fluctuations in two-photon interference exper- iments with differently bright and independently blinking remote quantum emitters, Physical Review B97, 195414 (2018)

    2018

  43. [43]

    Reigue, J

    A. Reigue, J. Iles-Smith, F. Lux, L. Monniello, M. Bernard, F. Margaillan, A. Lemaitre, A. Martinez, D. P. McCutcheon, J. Mørk, R. Hostein, and V. Volio- tis, Probing Electron-Phonon Interaction through Two- Photon Interference in Resonantly Driven Semiconduc- tor Quantum Dots, Physical Review Letters118, 233602 (2017)

    2017

  44. [44]

    Grange, N

    T. Grange, N. Somaschi, C. Antón, L. De Santis, G. Cop- pola, V. Giesz, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes, A. Auffèves, and P. Senellart, Reducing Phonon-Induced Decoherence in Solid-State Single-Photon Sources with Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics, Physical Review Letters118, 253602 (2017)

    2017

  45. [45]

    Maring, A

    N. Maring, A. Fyrillas, M. Pont, E. Ivanov, P. Stepanov, N. Margaria, W. Hease, A. Pishchagin, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes, T. H. Au, S. Boissier, E. Bertasi, A. Baert, M. Valdivia, M. Billard, O. Acar, A. Brieussel, R. Mezher, S. C. Wein, A. Salavrakos, P. Sinnott, D. A. Fioretto, P.-E. Emeriau, N. Belabas, S. Mansfield, P. Senellart, J. Senellart, and N. Som...

    2024

  46. [46]

    Coste, D

    N. Coste, D. A. Fioretto, N. Belabas, S. C. Wein, P. Hi- laire, R. Frantzeskakis, M. Gundin, B. Goes, N. So- maschi, M. Morassi, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes, A. Harouri, S. E. Economou, A. Auffeves, O. Krebs, L. Lanco, and P. Senellart, High-rate entanglement between a semicon- ductor spin and indistinguishable photons, Nature Pho- tonics17, 582 (2023)

    2023

  47. [47]

    H. Huet, P. R. Ramesh, S. C. Wein, N. Coste, P. Hilaire, N. Somaschi, M. Morassi, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes, M. F. Doty, O. Krebs, L. Lanco, D. A. Fioretto, and P. Senel- lart, Deterministic and reconfigurable graph state gener- ation with a single solid-state quantum emitter, Nature Communications16, 4337 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    S. C. Wein, J.-W. Ji, Y.-F. Wu, F. Kimiaee Asadi, R. Ghobadi, and C. Simon, Analyzing photon-count her- alded entanglement generation between solid-state spin qubits by decomposing the master-equation dynamics, Physical Review A102, 033701 (2020)

    2020

  49. [49]

    Ollivier, S

    H. Ollivier, S. Thomas, S. Wein, I. M. de Buy Wen- niger, N. Coste, J. Loredo, N. Somaschi, A. Harouri, A. Lemaitre, I. Sagnes, L. Lanco, C. Simon, C. Anton, O.Krebs,andP.Senellart,Hong-Ou-MandelInterference with Imperfect Single Photon Sources, Physical Review Letters126, 063602 (2021). 9 Methods Sample design.Our single-photon sources are based on low-d...

    2021

  50. [50]

    program; as well as by the PROQCIMA program within the French National Quantum Strategy (France 2030). This work was partially supported by the Paris Ile-de-France Région in the framework of DIM QUANTIP, the French Defense ministry - Agence de l’innovatio de défense, the European Union’s Horizon CL4 program under the grant agreement 101135288 for EPIQUE p...

    2030

  51. [51]

    2. 3. 4. Bias voltage S1 (V) Bias voltage S2 (V) Extended Data Fig. 4.Visualization of the HOM effect when the two sources are wavelength-matched.Two- photon coincidences at zero time delay integrated in a4 nstime window as a function of bias voltages applied to the sources in parallel (A∥) and orthogonal (A⊥) polarizations. This graph shows raw data (A∥,...