Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 227 references

AI-Powered Surrogate Modelling for Multiscale Combustion: A Critical Review and Opportunities

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-07 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read AI surrogate models can cut computation time for multiscale combustion while maintaining predictive power across scales.

desk verdict This review organizes AI surrogate work in combustion but its cross-study comparisons depend on fair literature selection. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.25617 v1 submitted 2026-04-28 physics.chem-ph

Amirali Shateri , Zhiyin Yang , Yuying Yan , Manosh C. Paul , Jianfei Xie This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords AIsurrogatemodelingmultiscalecombustionchemicalkineticsturbulentflamesphysics-guidedlearningemissionspredictionmodelssimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reviews how artificial intelligence builds surrogate models that approximate detailed combustion simulations at chemical, flame, and engine scales. It evaluates supervised, unsupervised, and hybrid physics-guided methods for accuracy, efficiency, and consistency. A sympathetic reader would care because full combustion calculations are too slow for routine design work, so reliable surrogates could let engineers test more configurations and explore low-emission strategies faster. The review maps current performance, flags recurring problems, and outlines paths toward more robust models.

What carries the argument

AI-powered surrogate models that approximate high-fidelity multiscale combustion simulations using supervised, unsupervised, and physics-guided learning.

What would settle it

A systematic re-analysis of the cited literature that finds most studies employ incompatible datasets, non-standardized test conditions, or incomparable metrics, making reliable accuracy rankings impossible.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Artificial intelligence has emerged as a promising framework for constructing surrogate models that reduce computational costs, deliver substantial speed-up and support prediction in complex reacting systems. The review assesses these models across chemical kinetics, mechanism reduction, turbulent flames, combustors, engines, and emissions prediction. It compares supervised, unsupervised, and hybrid or physics-guided approaches on predictive accuracy, physical consistency, computational efficiency, and generalizability. The work highlights challenges such as limited transferability across fuels and regimes, extrapolation errors, inconsistent datasets, and difficulties building trustworthy 2.

Load-bearing premise

The published studies on AI surrogates for combustion are consistent and representative enough to support meaningful cross-comparisons of accuracy, physical consistency, and generalizability.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Surrogate models can deliver large speed-ups for predictions in reacting flows and engine-relevant conditions.
  • Hybrid physics-guided methods show better physical consistency than purely data-driven ones across the reviewed scales.
  • Limited transferability across different fuels and operating points restricts immediate use in practical design workflows.
  • Standardized benchmarks and consistent datasets would be required to make future comparisons more reliable.
  • Development of scalable, physically grounded frameworks offers a route to next-generation combustion research tools.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If standardized datasets become available, the same surrogate-building techniques could be tested on related multiscale problems such as atmospheric chemistry or plasma flows.
  • Embedding these models into real-time engine control systems would provide a direct test of whether speed-up and consistency translate to operational value.
  • Addressing extrapolation errors might require coupling the surrogates with adaptive sampling strategies that the review leaves open for future work.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a critical review of AI-powered surrogate modeling for multiscale combustion. It surveys data-driven approaches spanning chemical kinetics, mechanism reduction, turbulent flames, combustors, engines, and emissions prediction. Supervised, unsupervised, and hybrid/physics-guided methods are compared with respect to predictive accuracy, physical consistency, computational efficiency, and generalizability across conditions and scales. The review identifies challenges including limited transferability, extrapolation errors, dataset inconsistencies, and the need for trustworthy models, while outlining future opportunities for more reliable and scalable surrogate frameworks.

Significance. If the synthesis of the literature is comprehensive and free of selection bias, the review could provide a useful reference point for combustion researchers seeking to reduce the cost of high-fidelity simulations through AI surrogates. By systematically contrasting accuracy, consistency, and speed-up across scales and by flagging concrete obstacles such as fuel-to-fuel transferability, the work has the potential to steer the community toward physically grounded surrogate development.

major comments (2)
  1. [Introduction / Scope of the review] The abstract states that supervised/unsupervised/hybrid approaches 'are examined and compared' on accuracy, physical consistency, efficiency, and generalizability, yet the manuscript provides no explicit description of the literature search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or total number of papers surveyed. This omission directly affects the reliability of any cross-study claims about speed-up factors or extrapolation performance.
  2. [Challenges and limitations] The discussion of 'inconsistency in datasets and benchmarks' is presented as a key challenge, but the review does not supply a consolidated table or quantitative meta-analysis (e.g., reported L2 errors or wall-clock speed-ups normalized to a common baseline) that would allow readers to weigh the magnitude of these inconsistencies against the reported successes.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Results / Comparison figures] Figure captions and axis labels in the comparison plots should explicitly state the reference solver and hardware used for each speed-up ratio so that the efficiency claims are immediately interpretable.
  2. [Methods / Appendix] A short appendix listing the exact search terms and databases used would improve reproducibility of the literature selection process.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and constructive comments, which help clarify the scope and presentation of our critical review. We have addressed both major points by enhancing the methodological transparency and adding a quantitative summary element. These changes will improve the manuscript's utility without altering its narrative critical-review character.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Introduction / Scope of the review] The abstract states that supervised/unsupervised/hybrid approaches 'are examined and compared' on accuracy, physical consistency, efficiency, and generalizability, yet the manuscript provides no explicit description of the literature search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or total number of papers surveyed. This omission directly affects the reliability of any cross-study claims about speed-up factors or extrapolation performance.

    Authors: We agree that greater transparency on paper selection would strengthen reader confidence. Our review is a critical synthesis rather than a formal systematic review; papers were chosen for their direct relevance to AI surrogates across combustion scales, drawing on the authors' domain expertise and coverage of key sub-fields (kinetics, turbulent flames, engines, emissions). To address the concern, we will insert a new subsection titled 'Review Scope and Paper Selection' early in the Introduction. This subsection will state the primary search databases (Web of Science, Google Scholar, arXiv), core keyword combinations, the approximate number of papers initially screened and ultimately discussed (approximately 120), and the inclusion emphasis on studies reporting both accuracy and physical-consistency metrics. We will explicitly note that the review does not perform a quantitative meta-analysis or claim exhaustive coverage, thereby clarifying that cross-study comparisons remain qualitative and trend-based. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Challenges and limitations] The discussion of 'inconsistency in datasets and benchmarks' is presented as a key challenge, but the review does not supply a consolidated table or quantitative meta-analysis (e.g., reported L2 errors or wall-clock speed-ups normalized to a common baseline) that would allow readers to weigh the magnitude of these inconsistencies against the reported successes.

    Authors: We concur that a consolidated overview would help readers gauge the practical impact of dataset inconsistencies. A full normalized meta-analysis is not feasible because the surveyed studies employ disparate error norms, reference solvers, hardware, and fuel/condition sets, precluding direct apples-to-apples comparison. Nevertheless, we will add a new table in the 'Challenges' section that compiles representative quantitative results (error metrics, reported speed-up factors, and dataset characteristics) from 15–20 key papers across the sub-fields. The table will retain the original reported values, flag the absence of common baselines, and use the inconsistencies themselves as evidence supporting the challenge narrative. This addition provides the requested quantitative context while remaining honest about the limitations of cross-study aggregation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: review synthesizes external literature without internal derivations

full rationale

This paper is a critical review that surveys and compares existing AI surrogate modeling approaches for multiscale combustion from the published literature. It presents no original derivations, equations, quantitative predictions, fitted parameters, or first-principles results of its own. All claims about speed-up, accuracy, physical consistency, and challenges rest on synthesis of prior independent works rather than any self-referential construction, self-citation load-bearing premise, or renaming of results. The absence of any derivation chain means no steps reduce to inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a literature review paper. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced because no new mathematical model or derivation is presented.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of AI-Powered Surrogate Modelling for Multiscale Combustion: A Critical Review and Opportunities." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.25617

@misc{pith2026260425617,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: AI-Powered Surrogate Modelling for Multiscale Combustion: A Critical Review and Opportunities},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.25617}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.25617}
}
read the original abstract

Recent advances in combustion science have led to the generation of large volumes of data from high-fidelity simulations, detailed chemical-kinetic calculations and engine-relevant measurements and create new opportunities for data-driven modelling across interacting physical and chemical scales. Among these approaches, artificial intelligence has emerged as a promising framework for constructing surrogate models that reduce computational costs, deliver substantial speed-up and support prediction in complex reacting systems. This review provides a state-of-the-art assessment of AI-powered surrogate modelling for multiscale combustion, spanning chemical kinetics, mechanism reduction, turbulent flames, combustors, engines, and emissions prediction. Supervised, unsupervised, and hybrid or physics-guided learning approaches are examined and compared in terms of predictive accuracy, physical consistency, computational efficiency, and generalizability across conditions and scales. The review further discusses key challenges, including limited transferability across fuels and operating regimes, extrapolation errors, inconsistency in datasets and benchmarks, and the difficulty of building robust and trustworthy models for practical combustion workflows. Future opportunities are identified in the development of more reliable, scalable, and physically grounded surrogate frameworks for next-generation combustion research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

227 extracted references · 227 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Verhelst, S., & Wallner, T. (2009). Hydrogen-fueled internal combustion engines. Progress in energy and combustion science, 35(6), 490-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2009.08.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2009.08.001 2009

  2. [2]

    Monge-Palacios, M., Zhang, X., Morlanes, N., Nakamura, H., Pezzella, G., & Sarathy, S. M. (2024). Ammonia pyrolysis and oxidation chemistry. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 105, 101177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2024.101177

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2024.101177 2024

  3. [3]

    Shi, C., Zhang, Z., Wang, H., Wang, J., Cheng, T., & Zhang, L. (2024). Parametric analysis and optimization of the combustion process and pollutant performance for ammonia -diesel dual-fuel engines. Energy, 296, 131171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131171

    work page doi:10.1016/j.energy.2024.131171 2024

  4. [4]

    Pitsch, H., Goeb, D., Cai, L., & Willems, W. (2024). Potential of oxymethylene ethers as renewable diesel substitute. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 104, 101173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2024.101173

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2024.101173 2024

  5. [5]

    R., & Shahbakhti, M

    Aliramezani, M., Koch, C. R., & Shahbakhti, M. (2022). Modeling, diagnostics, optimization, and control of internal combustion engines via modern machine learning techniques: A review and future directions. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 88 , 100967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100967

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100967 2022

  6. [6]

    Yu, D., & Chen, Z. (2024). Premixed flame ignition: Theoretical development. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 104, 101174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2024.101174

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2024.101174 2024

  7. [7]

    Shateri, A., Jalili, B., Saffar, S., Jalili, P., & Ganji, D. D. (2024). Numerical study of the effect of ultrasound waves on the turbulent flow with chemical reaction. Energy, 289, 129707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129707

    work page doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.129707 2024

  8. [8]

    Posch, S., Gößnitzer, C., Lang, M., Novella, R., Steiner, H., & Wimmer, A. (2025). Turbulent combustion modeling for internal combustion engine CFD: A review. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 106, 101200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2024.101200

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2024.101200 2025

Show all 227 references
  1. [9]

    T., & Mishra, A

    Ihme, M., Chung, W. T., & Mishra, A. A. (2022). Combustion machine learning: Principles, progress and prospects. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 91, 101010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2022.101010

    2022 doi

  2. [10]

    Mao, R., Lin, M., Zhang, Y ., Zhang, T., Xu, Z. Q. J., & Chen, Z. X. (2023). DeepFlame: A deep learning empowered open -source platform for reacting flow simulations. Computer Physics Communications, 291, 108842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108842 62

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    Mao, R., Dong, X., Bai, X., Wu, Z., Dang, G., Li, H., & Chen, Z. X. (2025). DeepFlame 2.0: A new version for fully GPU -native machine learning accelerated reacting flow simulations under low -Mach conditions. Computer Physics Communications, 312, 10959 5. https://doi.org/10.1...

    2025 doi

  4. [12]

    D., Babaee, H., Susi, B

    Goswami, S., Jagtap, A. D., Babaee, H., Susi, B. T., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2024). Learning stiff chemical kinetics using extended deep neural operators. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 419, 116674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.116674

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    Saito, M., Xing, J., Nagao, J., & Kurose, R. (2023). Data -driven simulation of ammonia combustion using neural ordinary differential equations (NODE). Applications in Energy and Combustion Science, 16, 100196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaecs.2023.100196

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    Ding, T., Rigopoulos, S., & Jones, W. P. (2022). Machine learning tabulation of thermochemistry of fuel blends. Applications in Energy and Combustion Science, 12, 100086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaecs.2022.100086

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    Ding, S., Ni, C., Chu, X., Lu, Q., & Wang, X. (2025). Reduced -order modeling via convolutional autoencoder for emulating combustion of hydrogen/methane fuel blends. Combustion and Flame, 274, 113981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2025.113981

    2025 doi

  8. [16]

    Li, H., Yang, R., Xu, Y ., Zhang, M., Mao, R., & Chen, Z. X. (2025). Comprehensive deep learning for combustion chemistry integration: Multi -fuel generalization and a posteriori validation in reacting flow. Physics of Fluids, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0248582

    2025 doi

  9. [17]

    & Clark, J

    Yang, A., Su, Y ., Wang, Z., Jin, S., Ren, J., Zhang, X., ... & Clark, J. H. (2021). A multi- task deep learning neural network for predicting flammability -related properties from molecular structures. Green chemistry, 23(12), 4451 -4465. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1GC00331C

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    Ranade, R., & Echekki, T. (2019). A framework for data -based turbulent combustion closure: A posteriori validation. Combustion and flame, 210, 279 -291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.08.039

    2019 doi

  11. [19]

    Zhang, S., Zhang, C., & Wang, B. (2025). A physics-informed neural network for aiding the acquisition of high -fidelity multiphysics fields in gas -phase combustion reacting flows without pre-training. Physics of Fluids, 37(9). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0284930

    2025 doi

  12. [21]

    Sun, H., Xue, R., He, X., Yang, J., Niu, Z., & Luo, K. (2025). Research on compressible FPV combustion model establishment via machine learning and its application in scramjet 63 engine simulation. Aerospace Science and Technology, 165, 110525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.20...

    2025 doi

  13. [22]

    J., & Noiray, N

    Malé, Q., Lapeyre, C. J., & Noiray, N. (2025). Hydrogen reaction rate modeling based on convolutional neural network for large eddy simulation. Data -Centric Engineering, 6, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/dce.2025.1

    2025 doi

  14. [23]

    & Bai, X

    Zhou, S., Yan, B., Mansour, M., Li, Z., Cheng, Z., Tao, J., ... & Bai, X. S. (2024). MILD combustion of low calorific value gases. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 104, 101163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2024.101163

    2024 doi

  15. [24]

    Zhang, Z., Di, L., Shi, L., Yang, X., Cheng, T., & Shi, C. (2024). Effect of liquid ammonia HPDI strategies on combustion characteristics and emission formation of ammonia-diesel dual- fuel heavy-duty engines. Fuel, 367, 131450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131450

    2024 doi

  16. [25]

    Ferrari, L., Sammito, G., Fischer, M., & Cavina, N. (2025). Machine Learning-Enhanced Combustion Modelling: Predicting Ethanol Effects in a Single-Cylinder Research Engine, SAE Technical Paper, (No. 2025-24-0026). https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-24-0026

    2025 doi

  17. [26]

    Xu, X., Wang, Z., Qu, W., Song, M., Fang, Y ., & Feng, L. (2024). Optimizations of energy fraction and injection strategy in the ammonia -diesel dual-fuel engine. Journal of the Energy Institute, 112, 101455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2023.101455

    2024 doi

  18. [27]

    & Bai, W

    Hu, S., Jin, Q., Gao, C., Zhang, X., Lu, M., He, Y., ... & Bai, W. (2025). The new paradigm of computational fluid dynamics: Empowering computational fluid dynamics with machine learning. Physics of Fluids, 37(8). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0280743

    2025 doi

  19. [28]

    C., Guiberti, T

    Zhang, M., Wei, X., An, Z., Okafor, E. C., Guiberti, T. F., Wang, J., & Huang, Z. (2025). Flame stabilization and emission characteristics of ammonia combustion in lab -scale gas turbine combustors: Recent progress and prospects. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 106,...

    2025 doi

  20. [29]

    Cao, R., Kang, H., Hu, Y ., Zheng, Z., Rong, W., Zhao, F., & Yu, W. (2026). Fast predictions of plasma-assisted NH3/air combustion based on model downscaling and machine learning coupled with kinetics mechanism. Fuel, 404, 136176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.136176

    2026 doi

  21. [30]

    E., Eckart, S., Valera-Medina, A., & Paykani, A

    Üstün, C. E., Eckart, S., Valera-Medina, A., & Paykani, A. (2024). Data-driven prediction of laminar burning velocity for ternary ammonia/hydrogen/methane/air premixed flames. Fuel, 368, 131581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131581

    2024 doi

  22. [31]

    Y ., Du, L., Liang, J., Li, J

    Yao, Q., Wang, B. Y ., Du, L., Liang, J., Li, J. Z., Zeng, P., ... & Wang, Q. D. (2025). Probing the Prediction of High -Temperature Ignition Delay Times of Jet Fuels via Machine Learning Approaches. Results in Engineering, 107420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107420 64

    2025 doi

  23. [32]

    (2024, January)

    Jose, A., Probst, D., & Biware, M. (2024, January). A Machine Learning Approach for Hydrogen Internal Combustion (H2ICE) Mixture Preparation. In Symposium on International Automotive Technology. SAE Technical Paper. https://doi.org/10.4271/2024-26-0254

    2024 doi

  24. [33]

    R., & Shahbakhti, M

    Shahpouri, S., Gordon, D., Hayduk, C., Rezaei, R., Koch, C. R., & Shahbakhti, M. (2023). Hybrid emission and combustion modeling of hydrogen fueled engines. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(62), 24037-24053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.153

    2023 doi

  25. [34]

    Sonawane, S., Sekhar, R., Warke, A., Thipse, S., Rairikar, S., & Varma, C. (2025). Experimental investigation and prediction of combustion parameters using machine learning in ethanol -gasoline blended engines. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 57(1), 27-47. h...

    2025 doi

  26. [35]

    Han, Z., Tang, X., Xie, Y ., Liang, R., & Bao, Y . (2024). Prediction of heavy-oil combustion emissions with a semi -supervised learning model considering variable operation conditions. Energy, 288, 129782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129782

    2024 doi

  27. [36]

    L., Noack, B

    Brunton, S. L., Noack, B. R., & Koumoutsakos, P. (2020). Machine learning for fluid mechanics. Annual review of fluid mechanics, 52(1), 477 -508. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214

    2020 doi

  28. [37]

    LeCun, Y ., Bengio, Y ., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. nature, 521(7553), 436-444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

    2015 doi

  29. [38]

    E., Kevrekidis, I

    Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2021). Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(6), 422 -440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5

    2021 doi

  30. [39]

    Chi, C., Janiga, G., & Thévenin, D. (2021). On -the-fly artificial neural network for chemical kinetics in direct numerical simulations of premixed combustion. Combustion and Flame, 226, 467-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.12.038

    2021 doi

  31. [40]

    P., & Welling, M

    Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2019). An introduction to variational autoencoders. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 12(4), 307 -392. https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000056

    2019 doi

  32. [41]

    A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M

    Mnih, V ., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., ... & Hassabis, D. (2015). Human -level control through deep reinforcement learning. nature, 518(7540), 529-533. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14236

    2015 doi

  33. [42]

    Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019). Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational physics, 378, 68 6-707. https://doi.org/10...

    2019 doi

  34. [43]

    & Friederich, P

    Reiser, P., Neubert, M., Eberhard, A., Torresi, L., Zhou, C., Shao, C., ... & Friederich, P. (2022). Graph neural networks for materials science and chemistry. Communications Materials, 3(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-022-00315-6

    2022 doi

  35. [44]

    & Wei, G

    Jiang, J., Ke, L., Chen, L., Dou, B., Zhu, Y ., Liu, J., ... & Wei, G. W. (2024). Transformer technology in molecular science. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science, 14(4), e1725. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1725

    2024 doi

  36. [45]

    L., & Butler, C

    Yang, Q., Sresht, V ., Bolgar, P., Hou, X., Klug -McLeod, J. L., & Butler, C. R. (2019). Molecular transformer unifies reaction prediction and retrosynthesis across pharma chemical space. Chemical communications, 55(81), 12152 -12155. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CC05122H

    2019 doi

  37. [46]

    Lu, L., Jin, P., Pang, G., Zhang, Z., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2021). Learning nonlinear operators via DeepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators. Nature machine intelligence, 3(3), 218-229. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00302-5

    2021 doi

  38. [47]

    Li, Z., Kovachki, N., Azizzadenesheli, K., Liu, B., Bhattacharya, K., Stuart, A., & Anandkumar, A. (2020). Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.08895. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.08895

    2020 doi

  39. [48]

    Beucler, T., Pritchard, M., Rasp, S., Ott, J., Baldi, P., & Gentine, P. (2021). Enforcing analytic constraints in neural networks emulating physical systems. Physical review letters, 126(9), 098302. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.098302

    2021 doi

  40. [49]

    D., Kharazmi, E., & Karniadakis, G

    Jagtap, A. D., Kharazmi, E., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2020). Conservative physics-informed neural networks on discrete domains for conservation laws: Applications to forward and inverse problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 365 , 113028. https://doi.org...

    2020 doi

  41. [50]

    Zhuang, F., Qi, Z., Duan, K., Xi, D., Zhu, Y ., Zhu, H., ... & He, Q. (2020). A comprehensive survey on transfer learning. Proceedings of the IEEE, 109(1), 43 -76. 10.1109/JPROC.2020.3004555

    2020 doi

  42. [51]

    Z., Ren, Y ., Luo, K

    Mao, Q., Feng, M., Jiang, X. Z., Ren, Y ., Luo, K. H., & van Duin, A. C. (2023). Classical and reactive molecular dynamics: Principles and applications in combustion and energy systems. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 97, 101084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2023.101084

    2023 doi

  43. [52]

    Shateri, A., Yang, Z., Sherkat, N., & Xie, J. (2026). Alcohol additives to enhance ammonia- methane combustion efficiency and reduce emissions: A reactive force field analysis. Fuel, 405, 136565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.136565 66

    2026 doi

  44. [53]

    Xie, J. (2024). Approaches for describing processes of fuel droplet heating and evaporation in combustion engines. Fuel, 360, 130465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130465

    2024 doi

  45. [54]

    Zeng, J., Cao, L., Xu, M., Zhu, T., & Zhang, J. Z. H. (2020). Complex reaction processes in combustion unraveled by neural network -based molecular dynamics simulation. Nature Communications, 11, 5713. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19497-z

    2020 doi

  46. [55]

    Zeng, J., Zhang, L., Wang, H., & Zhu, T. (2021). Exploring the chemical space of linear alkane pyrolysis via Deep Potential GENerator. Energy & Fuels, 35, 762 –769. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03211

    2021 doi

  47. [56]

    Zhang, L., Han, J., Wang, H., Car, R., & E, W. (2018). Deep Potential Molecular Dynamics: A scalable model with the accuracy of Quantum Mechanics. Physical Review Letters, 120, 143001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.143001

    2018 doi

  48. [58]

    S., & Jiang, X

    Xing, Z., Freitas, R. S., & Jiang, X. (2025). A data -driven multi -level simulation framework for ammonia -syngas combustion. Chemical Engineering Journal Advances, 100960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2025.100960

    2025 doi

  49. [59]

    Y ., He, Z

    Ma, W. Y ., He, Z. H., & Wen, B. (2026). Decoding the complex reaction network of nitromethane combustion via neural network potential molecular dynamics simulation. Fuel, 407, 137279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.137279

    2026 doi

  50. [60]

    Shateri, A., Yang, Z., Sherkat, N., Wei, S., & Xie, J. (2025). Data-driven discovery of NOx suppression mechanisms in ammonia–methane combustion via ReaxFF and ensemble learning. Chemical Engineering Science, 122812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2025.122812

    2025 doi

  51. [61]

    Shateri, A., Yang, Z., Xing, L., Yan, Y ., Wu, Z., & Xie, J. (2026). An extrapolative machine learning framework for forecasting nitrogen oxide mitigation in alcohol enhanced ammonia - methane blends. Energy and AI, 100705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2026.100705

    2026 doi

  52. [62]

    Q., Chen, M

    Nie, S. Q., Chen, M. Q., & Li, Q. H. (2022). Investigation of the depolymerization process of hydrothermal gasification natural rubber with ReaxFF -MD simulation and DFT computation. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 147(18), 9999 -10011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10...

    2022 doi

  53. [63]

    Li, N., Girhe, S., Zhang, M., Chen, B., Zhang, Y ., Liu, S., & Pitsch, H. (2024). A machine learning method to predict rate constants for various reactions in combustion kinetic models. Combustion and Flame, 263, 113375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2024.113375 67

    2024 doi

  54. [64]

    D., Jasper, A

    Shi, Z., Lele, A. D., Jasper, A. W., Klippenstein, S. J., & Ju, Y . (2024). Quasi -classical trajectory calculation of rate constants using an ab initio trained machine learning model (aML- MD) with multifidelity data. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , 128(17), 3449 -3457....

    2024 doi

  55. [65]

    Shateri, A., Yang, Z., & Xie, J. (2025). Machine learning -based molecular dynamics studies on predicting thermophysical properties of ethanol –octane blends. Energy & Fuels, 39(2), 1070-1090. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c05653

    2025 doi

  56. [66]

    & Zhang, L

    Jia, W., Wang, H., Chen, M., Lu, D., Lin, L., Car, R., ... & Zhang, L. (2020, November). Pushing the limit of molecular dynamics with ab initio accuracy to 100 million atoms with machine learning. In SC20: International conference for high performance computing, networking, st...

    2020 doi

  57. [67]

    Chu, Q., Wang, C., & Chen, D. (2022). Toward full ab initio modeling of soot formation in a nanoreactor. Carbon, 199, 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2022.07.055

    2022 doi

  58. [68]

    Xing, Z., & Jiang, X. (2024). Neural network potential -based molecular investigation of pollutant formation of ammonia and ammonia -hydrogen combustion. Chemical Engineering Journal, 489, 151492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.151492

    2024 doi

  59. [69]

    Xiao, H., & Yang, B. (2024). A neural network potential energy surface assisted molecular dynamics study on the pyrolysis behavior of two spiro -hydrocarbons. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 26(15), 11867-11879. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CP05425J

    2024 doi

  60. [70]

    Xiao, H., Chu, Z., Wang, C., Lu, J., Zhao, L., & Yang, B. (2024). Revealing the initial pyrolysis behavior of decalin in an experimental study coupled with neural network -assisted molecular dynamics. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 40(1 -4), 1 05525. https://doi.org/...

    2024 doi

  61. [71]

    Z., Jadrich, R

    Zhang, S., Makoś, M. Z., Jadrich, R. B., Kraka, E., Barros, K., Nebgen, B. T., ... & Smith, J. S. (2024). Exploring the frontiers of condensed -phase chemistry with a general reactive machine learning potential. Nature Chemistry, 16(5), 727-734. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-...

    2024 doi

  62. [72]

    Yang, S., Li, X., Zheng, M., Ren, C., & Guo, L. (2024). Generating a skeleton reaction network for reactions of large -scale ReaxFF MD pyrolysis simulations based on a machine learning predicted reaction class. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 26(6 ), 5649 -5668. https://d...

    2024 doi

  63. [73]

    Wen, M., Han, J., Zhang, X., Zhao, Y ., Zhang, Y., Chen, D., & Chu, Q. (2025). Predicting the catalytic mechanisms of CuO/PbO on energetic materials using machine learning 68 interatomic potentials. Chemical Engineering Science, 309, 121494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2025.121494

    2025 doi

  64. [74]

    W., Byun, H., Kim, Y ., Carter, C

    Yoon, T., Kim, S. W., Byun, H., Kim, Y ., Carter, C. D., & Do, H. (2023). Deep learning- based denoising for fast time -resolved flame emission spectroscopy in high -pressure combustion environment. Combustion and Flame, 248, 112583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112583

    2023 doi

  65. [75]

    Barwey, S., Raman, V ., & Steinberg, A. M. (2021). Extracting information overlap in simultaneous OH-PLIF and PIV fields with neural networks. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 38(4), 6241–6249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.180

    2021 doi

  66. [76]

    Dai, M., Zhou, B., Zhang, J., Cheng, R., Liu, Q., Zhao, R., … Gao, B. (2023). 3 -D soot temperature and volume fraction reconstruction of afterburner flame via deep learning algorithms. Combustion and Flame, 252, 112743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2023.112743

    2023 doi

  67. [77]

    Han, L., Gao, Q., Zhang, D., Feng, Z., Sun, Z., Li, B., & Li, Z. (2023). Deep neural network-based generation of planar CH distribution through flame chemiluminescence in premixed turbulent flame. Energy and AI, 12, 100221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100221

    2023 doi

  68. [78]

    Kildare, J. A. C., Chung, W. T., Evans, M. J., Tian, Z. F., Medwell, P. R., & Ihme, M. (2024). Predictions of instantaneous temperature fields in jet -in-hot-coflow flames using a multi-scale U -Net model. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 40, 10 5330. https://doi.org/1...

    2024 doi

  69. [79]

    R., Nathan, G

    Nie, X., Zhang, W., Dong, X., Medwell, P. R., Nathan, G. J., & Sun, Z. (2024). Reconstructing temperature fields from OH distribution and soot volume fraction in turbulent flames using an artificial neural network. Combustion and Flame, 259, 113182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.c...

    2024 doi

  70. [80]

    K., Nathan, G

    Liu, S., Wang, H., Sun, Z., Foo, K. K., Nathan, G. J., Dong, X., Evans, M. J., Dally, B. B., Luo, K., & Fan, J. (2024). Reconstructing soot fields in acoustically forced laminar sooting flames using physics -informed machine learning models. Proceeding s of the Combustion Inst...

    2024 doi

  71. [81]

    Jin, Y ., Zhu, S., Wang, S., Wang, F., Wu, Q., & Situ, G. (2024). Pentagon: physics - enhanced neural network for volumetric flame chemiluminescence tomography. Optics Express, 32(19), 32732-32752. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.536550

    2024 doi

  72. [82]

    Wang, Q., Gong, M., Matynia, A., Zhang, L., Qian, Y ., & Dang, C. (2024). Soot temperature and volume fraction field predictions via line -of-sight soot integral radiation 69 equation informed neural networks in laminar sooting flames. Physics of Fluids, 36(12), 121703. https:...

    2024 doi

  73. [83]

    Lyu, Z., Jia, X., Yang, Y ., Hu, K., Zhang, F., & Wang, G. (2021). A comprehensive investigation of LSTM-CNN deep learning model for fast detection of combustion instability. Fuel, 303, 121300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121300

    2021 doi

  74. [84]

    Maged, A., & Nour, M. (2025). Prediction of combustion pressure with deep learning using flame images. Fuel, 380, 133203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133203

    2025 doi

  75. [85]

    M., Sun, Z., Rothamer, D

    Pushpalayam, N., Nguyen, C. M., Sun, Z., Rothamer, D. A., Kim, K., Kweon, C. B., & Rajamani, R. (2025). Real -time combustion progress estimation using deep learning. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 230, 112584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.112584

    2025 doi

  76. [87]

    Huang, S., Tian, Y ., Deng, X., Yang, M., Chen, E., & Zhang, H. (2025). Supersonic combustion flow field reconstruction in a scramjet based on deep learning method. Aerospace Science and Technology, 161, 110169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.110169

    2025 doi

  77. [88]

    M., Faldella, F., & Doll, U

    Strässle, R. M., Faldella, F., & Doll, U. (2024). Deep learning-based image segmentation for instantaneous flame front extraction. Experiments in Fluids, 65, 94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-024-03814-z

    2024 doi

  78. [89]

    F., & Valera-Medina, A

    Mazzotta, L., Zhu, X., Davies, J., Sato, D., Borello, D., Mashruk, S., Guiberti, T. F., & Valera-Medina, A. (2025). Assessing the potential of a chemiluminescence and machine learning-based method for the sensing of premixed ammonia –hydrogen–air turbulent flames. Internationa...

    2025 doi

  79. [90]

    Shateri, A., Yang, Z., & Xie, J. (2024). Utilizing artificial intelligence to identify an optimal machine learning model for predicting fuel consumption in diesel engines. Energy and AI, 16, 100360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2024.100360

    2024 doi

  80. [91]

    Shateri, A., Yang, Z., Liu, Y ., & Xie, J. (2025). Data -driven optimization of turbulent kinetic energy and tumble-y in combustion engines: A comparative study of machine learning models. Fuel, 389, 134590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.134590 70

    2025 doi

  81. [92]

    Shateri, A., Yang, Z., & Xie, J. (2025). Machine learning-based prediction of species mass fraction and flame characteristics in partially premixed turbulent jet flame. Physics of Fluids, 37(7). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0277024

    2025 doi

  82. [93]

    Zhou, L., Song, Y ., Ji, W., & Wei, H. (2022). Machine learning for combustion. Energy and AI, 7, 100128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100128

    2022 doi

  83. [94]

    Weatheritt, J., & Sandberg, R. (2016). A novel evolutionary algorithm applied to algebraic modifications of the RANS stress–strain relationship. Journal of Computational Physics, 325, 22-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2016.08.015

    2016 doi

  84. [95]

    D., Weatheritt, J., Michelassi, V ., & Sandberg, R

    Zhao, Y ., Akolekar, H. D., Weatheritt, J., Michelassi, V ., & Sandberg, R. D. (2020). RANS turbulence model development using CFD-driven machine learning. Journal of Computational Physics, 411, 109413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109413

    2020 doi

  85. [96]

    Z., Talei, M., Brouzet, D., Chung, W

    Ho, J. Z., Talei, M., Brouzet, D., Chung, W. T., Sharma, P., & Ihme, M. (2024). Augmenting filtered flame front displacement models for LES using machine learning with a posteriori simulations. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 40(1 -4), 105311. https://doi.org/10.1016/...

    2024 doi

  86. [97]

    Liu, A., Ding, T., Liu, R., Rigopoulos, S., & Luo, K. (2024). Machine learning tabulation of thermochemistry for turbulent dimethyl ether (DME) flames. Fuel, 360, 130338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130338

    2024 doi

  87. [98]

    P., & Rigopoulos, S

    Readshaw, T., Jones, W. P., & Rigopoulos, S. (2023). On the incorporation of conservation laws in machine learning tabulation of kinetics for reacting flow simulation. Physics of Fluids, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0143894

    2023 doi

  88. [99]

    Wang, T., Yi, Y ., Yao, J., Xu, Z. Q. J., Zhang, T., & Chen, Z. (2025). Enforcing physical conservation in neural network surrogate models for complex chemical kinetics. Combustion and Flame, 275, 114105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2025.114105

    2025 doi

  89. [100]

    Kumar, A., & Echekki, T. (2024). Combustion chemistry acceleration with DeepONets. Fuel, 365, 131212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131212

    2024 doi

  90. [101]

    Kumar, A., & Echekki, T. (2025). Physics -constrained machine learning for reduced composition space chemical kinetics. Data -Centric Engineering, 6, e34. https://doi.org/10.1017/dce.2025.10012

    2025 doi

  91. [102]

    X., Zhang, Y ., & Xu, Z

    Zhang, T., Yi, Y ., Xu, Y ., Chen, Z. X., Zhang, Y ., & Xu, Z. Q. J. (2022). A multi-scale sampling method for accurate and robust deep neural network to predict combustion chemical kinetics. Combustion and Flame, 245, 112319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112319 71

    2022 doi

  92. [103]

    Chi, C., Xu, X., & Thévenin, D. (2022). Efficient premixed turbulent combustion simulations using flamelet manifold neural networks: A priori and a posteriori assessment. Combustion and Flame, 245, 112325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112325

    2022 doi

  93. [104]

    Song, M., Tang, X., Xing, J., Liu, K., Luo, K., & Fan, J. (2024). Physics-informed neural networks coupled with flamelet/progress variable model for solving combustion physics considering detailed reaction mechanism. Physics of Fluids, 36(10). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0227581

    2024 doi

  94. [105]

    Tang, H., Wang, Y ., Wang, T., & Tian, L. (2023). Discovering explicit Reynolds-averaged turbulence closures for turbulent separated flows through deep learning -based symbolic regression with non -linear corrections. Physics of Fluids, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0135638

    2023 doi

  95. [106]

    Serhani, A., Xing, V ., Dupuy, D., Lapeyre, C., & Staffelbach, G. (2024). Graph and convolutional neural network coupling with a high-performance large-eddy simulation solver. Computers & Fluids, 278, 106306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2024.106306

    2024 doi

  96. [107]

    T., & Ihme, M

    Sharma, P., Chung, W. T., & Ihme, M. (2025). A physics -informed machine learning approach for predicting dynamic behavior of reacting flows with application to hydrogen jet flames. Combustion and Flame, 277, 114190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2025.114190

    2025 doi

  97. [108]

    T., Mishra, A

    Chung, W. T., Mishra, A. A., Perakis, N., & Ihme, M. (2021). Data-assisted combustion simulations with dynamic submodel assignment using random forests. Combustion and Flame, 227, 172-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.12.041

    2021 doi

  98. [109]

    Hartung, T. (2025). AI, agentic models and lab automation for scientific discovery—the beginning of scAInce. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1649155. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1649155

    2025 doi

  99. [110]

    H., Winther, K

    Montoya, J. H., Winther, K. T., Flores, R. A., Bligaard, T., Hummelshøj, J. S., & Aykol, M. (2020). Autonomous intelligent agents for accelerated materials discovery. Chemical Science, 11(32), 8517-8532. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SC01101K

    2020 doi

  100. [111]

    Dana, A. G. (2026). The agentic age of predictive chemical kinetics. Chemical Science, 17(1), 27-35. 10.1039/D5SC07692G

    2026 doi

  101. [112]

    G., & Martínez, J

    Martínez, L., Andrade, R., Birgin, E. G., & Martínez, J. M. (2009). PACKMOL: A package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of computational chemistry, 30(13), 2157-2164. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21224

    2009 doi

  102. [113]

    I., Stelter, D., Lambert, J., Saladi, S

    Jewett, A. I., Stelter, D., Lambert, J., Saladi, S. M., Roscioni, O. M., Ricci, M., ... & Goodsell, D. S. (2021). Moltemplate: A tool for coarse-grained modeling of complex biological 72 matter and soft condensed matter physics. Journal of molecular biology, 433(11), 166841. h...

    2021 doi

  103. [114]

    P., Aktulga, H

    Thompson, A. P., Aktulga, H. M., Berger, R., Bolintineanu, D. S., Brown, W. M., Crozier, P. S., ... & Plimpton, S. J. (2022). LAMMPS -a flexible simulation tool for particle -based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Computer physics communications, 2...

    2022 doi

  104. [115]

    P., Baird, S

    Tom, G., Schmid, S. P., Baird, S. G., Cao, Y ., Darvish, K., Hao, H., ... & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2024). Self -driving laboratories for chemistry and materials science. Chemical Reviews, 124(16), 9633-9732. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00055

    2024 doi

  105. [116]

    M., Moghaddam, A

    Sadeq, A. M., Moghaddam, A. H., Sleiti, A. K., & Ahmed, S. F. (2024). Development of machine learning models for studying the premixed turbulent combustion of Gas -To-Liquids (GTL) fuel blends. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 41(2), 479 -494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1...

    2024 doi

  106. [117]

    Han, X., Jia, M., Chang, Y ., & Li, Y . (2022). An improved approach towards more robust deep learning models for chemical kinetics. Combustion and Flame, 238, 111934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111934

    2022 doi

  107. [118]

    Mishra, R., Mayilvahanan, S., & Jarrahbashi, D. (2023). Hybrid unsupervised cluster - wise regression approach for representing the flamelet tables. Energy & Fuels, 37(4), 3056 -

    2023

  108. [119]

    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c03766

    doi

  109. [120]

    Wan, K., Barnaud, C., Vervisch, L., & Domingo, P. (2021). Machine learning for detailed chemistry reduction in DNS of a syngas turbulent oxy -flame with side -wall effects. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 38(2), 2825 -2833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.047

    2021 doi

  110. [121]

    Zhang, J., Huang, H., Xia, Z., Ma, L., Duan, Y ., Feng, Y ., & Huang, J. (2020). Artificial neural networks for chemistry representation in numerical simulation of the flamelet -based models for turbulent combustion. IEEE Access, 8, 80020 -80029. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990943

    2020 doi

  111. [122]

    D., & Schmidt, D

    Haghshenas, M., Mitra, P., Santo, N. D., & Schmidt, D. P. (2021). Acceleration of chemical kinetics computation with the learned intelligent tabulation (LIT) method. Energies, 14(23), 7851. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14237851

    2021 doi

  112. [123]

    Echekki, T., Farooq, A., Ihme, M., & Sarathy , S. M. (2023). Machine learning for combustion chemistry. In Machine learning and its application to reacting flows: ML and combustion (pp. 117 -147). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16248-0_5 73

    2023 doi

  113. [124]

    Almeldein, A., & Van Dam, N. (2023). Accelerating chemical kinetics calculations with physics informed neural networks. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 145(9), 091008. https://doi.org/10.1115/ICEF2022-90371

    2023 doi

  114. [125]

    Xing, V ., & Lapeyre, C. J. (2023). Deep convolutional neural networks for subgrid-scale flame wrinkling modeling. In Machine Learning and Its Application to Reacting Flows: ML and Combustion (pp. 149 -174). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-...

    2023 doi

  115. [126]

    An, J., He, G., Luo, K., Qin, F., & Liu, B. (2020). Artificial neural network based chemical mechanisms for computationally efficient modeling of hydrogen/carbon monoxide/kerosene combustion. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(53), 29594 - 29605. https://doi.org/10.1...

    2020 doi

  116. [127]

    An, J., Qin, F., Zhang, J., & Ren, Z. (2022). Explore artificial neural networks for solving complex hydrocarbon chemistry in turbulent reactive flows. Fundamental Research, 2(4), 595-

    2022

  117. [128]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2021.08.007

    2021 doi

  118. [129]

    Shin, J., Hansinger, M., Pfitzner, M., & Klein, M. (2022). A priori analysis on deep learning of filtered reaction rate. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 109(2), 383 -409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-022-00330-0

    2022 doi

  119. [130]

    Wang, Y ., Liang, S., Xu, Z. Q. J., Zhang, T., & Ji, L. (2024). Artificial neural network aided unstable combustion state prediction and dominant chemical kinetic analysis. Chemical Engineering Science, 300, 120567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2024.120567

    2024 doi

  120. [131]

    Zhang, M., Mao, R., Li, H., Yang, R., & Chen, Z. X. (2023). GPU -accelerated Large Eddy Simulation of turbulent stratified flames with machine learning chemistry. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.05800. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.05800

    2023 doi

  121. [132]

    Wan, K., Barnaud, C., Vervisch, L., & Domingo, P. (2020). Chemistry reduction using machine learning trained from non-premixed micro-mixing modeling: Application to DNS of a syngas turbulent oxy -flame with side -wall effects. Combustion and Flame, 220 , 119-129. https://doi.o...

    2020 doi

  122. [133]

    Domingo, P., Nikolaou, Z., Seltz, A., & Vervisch, L. (2020). From discrete and iterative deconvolution operators to machine learning for premixed turbulent combustion modeling. In Data Analysis for Direct Numerical Simulations of Turbulent Combustion : From Equation - Based An...

    2020 doi

  123. [134]

    Castellanos, L., SM Freitas, R., Parente, A., & Contino, F. (2023). Deep learning dynamical latencies for the analysis and reduction of combustion chemistry kinetics. Physics of Fluids, 35(10). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0167110

    2023 doi

  124. [135]

    Owoyele, O., & Pal, P. (2020). Chemnode: A neural ordinary differential equations approach for chemical kinetics solvers. arXiv preprint .https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.04749

    2020 doi

  125. [136]

    M., & Xu, C

    Han, Z., Li, J., Zhang, B., Hossain, M. M., & Xu, C. (2021). Prediction of combustion state through a semi -supervised learning model and flame imaging. Fuel, 289, 119745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119745

    2021 doi

  126. [137]

    Kumar, A., & Echekki, T. (2023). A framework for combustion chemistry acceleration with DeepONets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12188. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2304.12188

    2023 doi

  127. [138]

    M., Echekki, T., & Som, S

    Owoyele, O., Kundu, P., Ameen, M. M., Echekki, T., & Som, S. (2020). Application of deep artificial neural networks to multi -dimensional flamelet libraries and spray flames. International Journal of Engine Research, 21(1), 151 -168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468087419837770

    2020 doi

  128. [139]

    Wu, S., Wang, H., & Luo, K. H. (2024). A robust autoregressive long-term spatiotemporal forecasting framework for surrogate-based turbulent combustion modeling via deep learning. Energy and AI, 15, 100333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2023.100333

    2024 doi

  129. [140]

    Xu, W., Yang, T., & Zhang, P. (2025). Dynamical mode recognition of coupled flame oscillators by supervised and unsupervised learning approaches. Knowledge -Based Systems, 307, 112683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112683

    2025 doi

  130. [141]

    P., & Crowley, M

    Bhalla, S., Yao, M., Hickey, J. P., & Crowley, M. (2019, September). Compact representation of a multi -dimensional combustion manifold using deep neural networks. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases (pp. 602-617). Cham: Spring...

    2019 doi

  131. [142]

    Ranade, R., Li, G., Li, S., & Echekki, T. (2021). An efficient machine-learning approach for PDF tabulation in turbulent combustion closure. Combustion Science and Technology, 193(7), 1258-1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2019.1686702

    2021 doi

  132. [143]

    H., Qin, F., & He, G

    An, J., Wang, H., Liu, B., Luo, K. H., Qin, F., & He, G. Q. (2020). A deep learning framework for hydrogen -fueled turbulent combustion simulation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(35), 17992-18000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.286 75

    2020 doi

  133. [144]

    S., & Rochinha, F

    Freitas, R. S., & Rochinha, F. A. (2024). An embedded deep learning model discrepancy for computational combustion simulations. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 46(4), 177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-04750-z

    2024 doi

  134. [145]

    E., Bhuiyan, S

    Shejan, M. E., Bhuiyan, S. M. Y ., Schoen, M. P ., & Mahamud, R. (2024). Assessment of machine learning techniques for simulating reacting flow: From plasma -assisted ignition to turbulent flame propagation. Energies, 17(19), 4887. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17194887

    2024 doi

  135. [146]

    Y ., Chang, J

    Jung, M. Y ., Chang, J. H., Oh, M., & Lee, C. H. (2023). Dynamic model and deep neural network-based surrogate model to predict dynamic behaviors and steady-state performance of solid propellant combustion. Combustion and Flame, 250, 112649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustfl...

    2023 doi

  136. [147]

    E., & Chandola, V

    Salunkhe, A., Deighan, D., DesJardin, P. E., & Chandola, V . (2023). Physics informed machine learning for chemistry tabulation. Journal of Computational Science, 69, 102001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2023.102001

    2023 doi

  137. [148]

    C., Kim, S., & Deng, S

    Koenig, B. C., Kim, S., & Deng, S. (2025). ChemKANs for combustion chemistry modeling and acceleration. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 27(33), 17313 -17330. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5CP02009C

    2025 doi

  138. [149]

    M., Qi, Q., Zhang, B., & Xu, C

    Han, Z., Li, J., Hossain, M. M., Qi, Q., Zhang, B., & Xu, C. (2022). An ensemble deep learning model for exhaust emissions prediction of heavy oil -fired boiler combustion. Fuel, 308, 121975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121975

    2022 doi

  139. [150]

    Ding, T., Readshaw, T., Rigopoulos, S., & Jones, W. P. (2021). Machine learning tabulation of thermochemistry in turbulent combustion: An approach based on hybrid flamelet/random data and multiple multilayer perceptrons. Combustion and Flame, 231, 111493. https://doi.org/10.10...

    2021 doi

  140. [151]

    M., Ranade, R., & Echekki, T

    Gitushi, K. M., Ranade, R., & Echekki, T. (2022). Investigation of deep learning methods for efficient high -fidelity simulations in turbulent combustion. Combustion and Flame, 236, 111814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111814

    2022 doi

  141. [152]

    F., Karandashev, I

    Nikitin, V . F., Karandashev, I. M., Malsagov, M. Y ., & Mikhalchenko , E. V . (2022). Approach to combustion calculation using neural network. Acta Astronautica, 194, 376 -382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.10.034

    2022 doi

  142. [153]

    M., Falfari, S., & Forte, C

    Pulga, L., Bianchi, G. M., Falfari, S., & Forte, C. (2020). A machine learning methodology for improving the accuracy of laminar flame simulations with reduced chemical kinetics mechanisms. Combustion and Flame, 216, 72 -81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.02.021 76

    2020 doi

  143. [154]

    (2023, December)

    Shrivastava, S., Gohel, S., Srinivasa, M., Patil, H., & Nakod, P. (2023, December). Accuracy Improvement of Flamelet Generated Manifold (FGM) Model in Modeling Partially Premixed Combustion Systems by Combining Machine Learning. In Gas Turbine India Conference (V ol. 87721, p....

    2023 doi

  144. [155]

    Cho, S., Park, J., Song, C., Oh, S., Lee, S., Kim, M., & Min, K. (2019). Prediction modeling and analysis of knocking combustion using an improved 0D RGF model and supervised deep learning. Energies, 12(5), 844. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12050844

    2019 doi

  145. [156]

    Qian, Y ., Wang, J., Douasbin, Q., & Darve, E. (2023). Physics -based parameterized neural ordinary differential equations: prediction of laser ignition in a rocket combustor. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.08629. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.08629

    2023 doi

  146. [157]

    P., Valorani, M., & Im, H

    Malpica Galassi, R., Ciottoli, P. P., Valorani, M., & Im, H. G. (2022). Local combustion regime identification using machine learning. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 26(1), 135-

    2022

  147. [158]

    https://doi.org/10.1080/13647830.2021.1991595

    2021 doi

  148. [159]

    Zhang, H., Lu, H., Xie, F., Ma, T., & Qian, X. (2022). Combustion regime identification in turbulent non -premixed flames with principal component analysis, clustering and back - propagation neural network. Processes, 10(8), 1653. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10081653

    2022 doi

  149. [160]

    N., Scialabba, G., Attili, A., & Pitsch, H

    Grenga, T., Nista, L., Schumann, C., Karimi, A. N., Scialabba, G., Attili, A., & Pitsch, H. (2023). Predictive data -driven model based on generative adversarial network for premixed turbulence-combustion regimes. Combustion Science and Technology, 19 5(15), 3923 -3946. https:...

    2023 doi

  150. [161]

    Liu, H., Alhumade, H., & Elkamel, A. (2023). A combined scheme of parallel -reaction kinetic model and multi -layer artificial neural network model on pyrolysis of Reed Canary. Chemical Engineering Science, 281, 119109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2023.119109

    2023 doi

  151. [162]

    Molina, S., Novella, R., Gomez -Soriano, J., & Olcina -Girona, M. (2021). New combustion modelling approach for methane-hydrogen fueled engines using machine learning and engine virtualization. Energies, 14(20), 6732. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206732

    2021 doi

  152. [163]

    Setzwein, F., Grader, M., Seitz, T., Ess, P., & Gerlinger, P. (2021). Application of artificial neural networks for the simulation of a perfectly premixed chemical reactor. In AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2021 Forum (p. 3631). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-3631

    2021 doi

  153. [164]

    Yellapantula, S., de Frahan, M. T. H., King, R., Day, M., & Grout, R. (2020). Machine learning of combustion LES models from reacting direct numerical simulation. In Data analysis for direct numerical simulations of turbulent combustion: from equatio n-based analysis to 77 mac...

    2020 doi

  154. [165]

    Y ., Mikhalchenko, E

    Malsagov, M. Y ., Mikhalchenko, E. V ., Karandashev, I. M., & Stamov, L. I. (2024). Machine learning methods for modeling the kinetics of combustion in problems of space safety. Acta Astronautica, 225, 656-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.09.039

    2024 doi

  155. [166]

    T., Domingo, P., Vervisch, L., & Nguyen, P

    Nguyen, H. T., Domingo, P., Vervisch, L., & Nguyen, P. D. (2021). Machine learning for integrating combustion chemistry in numerical simulations. Energy and AI, 5, 100082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100082

    2021 doi

  156. [167]

    L., Safarzadeh, M., & Sobhani, S

    Navaei, R. L., Safarzadeh, M., & Sobhani, S. M. J. (2025). Optimizing flamelet generated manifold models: A machine learning performance study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.01030. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.01030

    2025 doi

  157. [168]

    Zhang, T., Zhang, Y ., & Ju, Y . (2020). A deep learning-based ODE solver for chemical kinetics. arXiv preprintarXiv:2012.12654. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.12654

    2020 doi

  158. [169]

    C., & Deng, S

    Koenig, B. C., & Deng, S. (2023). Multi-target active subspaces generated using a neural network for computationally efficient turbulent combustion kinetic uncertainty quantification in the flamelet regime. Combustion and Flame, 258, 113015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustfl...

    2023 doi

  159. [170]

    T., Mishra, A

    Chung, W. T., Mishra, A. A., Perakis, N., & Ihme, M. (2021). Accelerating High-fidelity Combustion Simulations with Classification Algorithms. In AAAI Spring Symposium: MLPS

    2021

  160. [171]

    Chen, S., Yu, C., Zhu, Y ., Fan, W., Yu, H., & Zhang, T. (2024). NOx formation model for utility boilers using robust two -step steady -state detection and multimodal residual convolutional auto -encoder. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engin eers, 155, 105252. htt...

    2024 doi

  161. [172]

    Du, S., Han, W., Kang, Z., Liao, Y ., & Li, Z. (2024). A Convolution Auto -Encoders Network for Aero -Engine Hot Jet FT -IR Spectrum Feature Extraction and Classification. Aerospace, 11(11), 933. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11110933

    2024 doi

  162. [173]

    Ranjan, R., Panchal, A., Karpe, S., & Menon, S. (2023). Machine learning strategy for subgrid modeling of turbulent combustion using linear Eddy mixing based tabulation. In Machine Learning and Its Application to Reacting Flows: ML and Combustion (pp. 175-208). Cham: Springer ...

    2023 doi

  163. [174]

    H., kyun Im, S., Do, H., & Bak, M

    Bong, C., Ali, M. H., kyun Im, S., Do, H., & Bak, M. S. (2024). Machine learning-based prediction of swirl combustor operation from flame imaging. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 138, 109374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109374 78

    2024 doi

  164. [175]

    Chen, E., Tian, Y ., Yang, M., Liang, S., Zhang, H., & Le, J. (2026). Optimizing ethylene combustion mechanisms in scramjet: A machine learning approach combining swarm intelligence and deep learning. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 172, 110458. https:/...

    2026 doi

  165. [176]

    Tang, X., Liao, H., & Gong, J. (2025). Machine Learning Approaches to Ignitability Classification of Solid Combustibles. Combustion Science and Technology, 1 -24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2025.2540313

    2025 doi

  166. [177]

    Gordon, D., Norouzi, A., Blomeyer, G., Bedei, J., Aliramezani, M., Andert, J., & Koch, C. R. (2023). Support vector machine based emissions modeling using particle swarm optimization for homogeneous charge compression ignition engine. International J ournal of Engine Research,...

    2023 doi

  167. [178]

    Wu, J., Zhang, S., Wu, Y ., Zhang, G., Li, X., & Zhang, H. (2025). FlamePINN -1D: Physics-informed neural networks to solve forward and inverse problems of 1D laminar flames. Combustion and Flame, 273, 113964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2025.113964

    2025 doi

  168. [179]

    A., Paulson, N

    Pan, J., Libera, J. A., Paulson, N. H., & Stan, M. (2021). Flame stability analysis of flame spray pyrolysis by artificial intelligence. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 114(7), 2215-2228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06884-z

    2021 doi

  169. [180]

    S., López‐Martín, M., Parente, A., & Le Clainche, S

    Corrochano, A., Freitas, R. S., López‐Martín, M., Parente, A., & Le Clainche, S. (2025). A Predictive Physics‐Aware Hybrid Reduced Order Model for Reacting Flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 126(11), e70058. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.70058

    2025 doi

  170. [181]

    Xu, X., Zhong, J., Hu, Y ., Zhang, R., Zhang, K., Qi, Y ., & Wang, Z. (2025). A Deep Neural Network -Based Approach for Optimizing Ammonia –Hydrogen Combustion Mechanism. Energies, 18(22), 5877. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18225877

    2025 doi

  171. [182]

    A., Sirjean, B., Fournet, R., Montagne, P.,

    Bounaceur, R., Heymes, R., Glaude, P. A., Sirjean, B., Fournet, R., Montagne, P., ... & Molière, M. (2024). Development of an artificial intelligence model to predict combustion properties, with a focus on auto -ignition delay. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbine s and Powe...

    2024 doi

  172. [183]

    Gangopadhyay, T., De, S., Liu, Q., Mukhopadhyay, A., Sen, S., & Sarkar, S. (2022). A deep learning approach to detect lean blowout in combustion systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01871. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.01871

    2022 doi

  173. [184]

    J., Johnson, R

    Sharma, A. J., Johnson, R. F., Kessler, D. A., & Moses, A. (2020). Deep learning for scalable chemical kinetics. In AIAA scitech 2020 forum (p. 0181). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-0181 79

    2020 doi

  174. [185]

    Yu, R., Hodzic, E., & Nogenmyr, K. J. (2024). Learning flame evolution operator under hybrid Darrieus Landau and diffusive thermal instability. Energies, 17(13), 3097. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17133097

    2024 doi

  175. [186]

    Guo, Z., Mao, R., Liu, L., Tan, G., Jia, W., & Chen, Z. X. (2025, November). Deep Learning-Enabled Supercritical Flame Simulation at Detailed Chemistry and Real -Fluid Accuracy Towards Trillion-Cell Scale. In Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Com...

    2025 doi

  176. [187]

    X., & Wang, H

    Cai, Y ., Yang, R., Li, H., Xu, J., Xiao, K., Chen, Z. X., & Wang, H. (2025). Efficient machine learning method for supercritical combustion: Predicting real -fluid properties and chemical ODEs. Aerospace Science and Technology, 159, 110034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.110034

    2025 doi

  177. [188]

    M., Sideris, A., & Sirignano, W

    Shadram, Z., Nguyen, T. M., Sideris, A., & Sirignano, W. A. (2022). Physics -aware neural network flame closure for combustion instability modeling in a single -injector engine. Combustion and Flame, 240, 111973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111973

    2022 doi

  178. [189]

    Bhattacharya, A., & Majumdar, P. (2024). Artificial intelligence -machine learning algorithms for the simulation of combustion thermal analysis. Heat Transfer Engineering, 45(2), 176-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/01457632.2023.2178282

    2024 doi

  179. [190]

    N., Al -Shawabkeh, A

    Olimat, A. N., Al -Shawabkeh, A. F., Al -Qadi, Z. A., & Al -Najdawi, N. A. (2022). Forecasting the influence of the guided flame on the combustibility of timber species using artificial intelligence. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 38, 102379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cs...

    2022 doi

  180. [191]

    E., & Chandola, V

    Salunkhe, A., Deighan, D., DesJardin, P. E., & Chandola, V . (2022, June). Chemtab: A physics guided chemistry modeling framework. In International Conference on Computational Science (pp. 75-88). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.o rg/10.1007/978-3- 031-08751-6_6

    2022 doi

  181. [192]

    X., & Swaminathan, N

    Iavarone, S., Yang, H., Li, Z., Chen, Z. X., & Swaminathan, N. (2023). On the use of machine learning for subgrid scale filtered density function modelling in large eddy simulations of combustion systems. In Machine Learning and Its Application to Re acting Flows: ML and Combu...

    2023 doi

  182. [193]

    Yang, T., Yin, Y ., Liu, Q., Yu, T., Wang, Y ., Zhou, H., & Ren, Z. (2025). Reinforcement learning for submodel assignment in adaptive modeling of turbulent flames. AIAA Journal, 63(2), 707-715. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J064213 80

    2025 doi

  183. [194]

    & Yang, Y

    An, B., Sun, M., Zhao, Q., Yang, L., Yang, D., Huang, Y ., ... & Yang, Y . (2024). Analysis of the combustion modes in a rocket -based combined cycle combustor using unsupervised machine learning methodology. Physics of Fluids, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0185024

    2024 doi

  184. [195]

    Zou, X., Abadia-Heredia, R., Saavedra, L., Parente, A., Xue, R., & Clainche, S. L. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence and hybrid models to accelerate LES in reactive flows: Application to hydrogen/methane combustion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507 .08426. https://doi.org/10...

    2025 doi

  185. [196]

    Barwey, S. (2022). Data -Driven Modeling of Compressible Reacting Flow Using Hardware-Oriented Algorithms (Doctoral dissertation). https://dx.doi.org/10.7302/6115

    2022 doi

  186. [197]

    J., & Deng, S

    Ji, W., Richter, F., Gollner, M. J., & Deng, S. (2022). Autonomous kinetic modeling of biomass pyrolysis using chemical reaction neural networks. Combustion and Flame, 240, 111992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.111992

    2022 doi

  187. [198]

    M., Shateri, A., Jalili, P., Jalili, B., & Ganji, D

    Ganji, A. M., Shateri, A., Jalili, P., Jalili, B., & Ganji, D. D. (2025). Physics -Informed Deep Operator Learning Framework for Multiphysics Heat and Mass Transport in Rotating Disk Energy Systems. Results in Engineering, 108283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108283

    2025 doi

  188. [199]

    M., Shateri, A., Ganji, D

    Ganji, A. M., Shateri, A., Ganji, D. D., Jalili, P., & Jalili, B. (2025). Physics -informed neural network coupled with semi -analytical hybrid modeling of micropolar magnetohydrodynamic channel flow with heat and mass transport in a porous medium. Physics of Fluids, 37(11). h...

    2025 doi

  189. [200]

    Vlaswinkel, M., & Willems, F. (2024). Data-based in-cylinder pressure model with cyclic variations for combustion control: An RCCI engine application. Energies, 17(8), 1881. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17081881

    2024 doi

  190. [201]

    T., Mishra, A

    Chung, W. T., Mishra, A. A., & Ihme, M. (2022). Interpretable data-driven methods for subgrid-scale closure in LES for transcritical LOX/GCH4 combustion. Combustion and Flame, 239, 111758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111758

    2022 doi

  191. [202]

    A., & V otsmeier, M

    Döppel, F. A., & V otsmeier, M. (2024). Robust mechanism discovery with atom conserving chemical reaction neural networks. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 40(1- 4), 105507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2024.105507

    2024 doi

  192. [203]

    M., & Xu, C

    Han, Z., Tang, X., Hossain, M. M., & Xu, C. (2023). Assessment of flame stability through a convolutional denoising autoencoder and statistical analysis. Combustion and Flame, 258, 113069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2023.113069 81

    2023 doi

  193. [204]

    P., Xia, J., Zhang, R., Grauer, S

    Molnar, J. P., Xia, J., Zhang, R., Grauer, S. J., & Liu, C. (2025). Unsupervised neural - implicit laser absorption tomography for quantitative imaging of unsteady flames. Combustion and Flame, 279, 114298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2025.114298

    2025 doi

  194. [205]

    & Chen, D

    Chen, X., Xu, Y ., Wen, M., Wang, Y ., Pang, K., Wang, S., ... & Chen, D. (2025). EM- HyChem: Bridging molecular simulations and chemical reaction neural network -enabled approach to modelling energetic material chemistry. Combustion and Flame, 275, 1140 65. https://doi.org/10...

    2025 doi

  195. [206]

    Pang, Z., Liu, A., Liu, K., Cheng, Y ., Luo, K., & Fan, J. (2025). Three -dimensional residual convolutional neural networks for turbulence modeling in large -eddy simulations of partially premixed swirl flames. Physics of Fluids, 37(7). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0273662

    2025 doi

  196. [207]

    G., Al-Muslem, A., Ahmad, N., Alquaity, A

    Abdul Jameel, A. G., Al-Muslem, A., Ahmad, N., Alquaity, A. B., Zahid, U., & Ahmed, U. (2022). Predicting enthalpy of combustion using machine learning. Processes, 10(11), 2384. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112384

    2022 doi

  197. [208]

    Rüttgers, A., Petrarolo, A., & Kobald, M. (2020). Clustering of paraffin -based hybrid rocket fuels combustion data. Experiments in Fluids, 61(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348- 019-2837-8

    2020 doi

  198. [209]

    He, K., & Ding, H. (2024). Prediction of NOx emissions in thermal power plants using a dynamic soft sensor based on random forest and just -in-time learning methods. Sensors, 24(14), 4442. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24144442

    2024 doi

  199. [210]

    Controlling shape of flame with differentiable physics

    Leja, L., & Freivalds, K. Controlling shape of flame with differentiable physics. Engineering for Rural Development, 24, 666-672. Doi: 0.22616/ERDev.2025.24.TF141

    2025

  200. [211]

    Meuwly, M. (2021). Transformative applications of machine learning for chemical reactions. arXiv preprintarXiv:2101.03530. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.03530

    2021 doi

  201. [212]

    S., Koklu, M., & Altin, M

    Taspinar, Y . S., Koklu, M., & Altin, M. (2021). Classification of flame extinction based on acoustic oscillations using artificial intelligence methods. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 28, 101561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2021.101561

    2021 doi

  202. [213]

    (2020, August)

    D’Alessio, G., Attili, A., Cuoci, A., Pitsch, H., & Parente, A. (2020, August). Unsupervised data analysis of direct numerical simulation of a turbulent flame via local principal component analysis and procustes analysis. In International workshop on soft computing models in i...

    2020 doi

  203. [214]

    Staszak, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the modeling of chemical reactions kinetics. Physical Sciences Reviews, 8(1), 51-72. https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2020-0079 82

    2023 doi

  204. [215]

    Shi, X., Jiang, D., Qian, W., & Liang, Y . (2022). Application of the Gaussian process regression method based on a combined kernel function in engine performance prediction. ACS omega, 7(45), 41732-41743. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c05952

    2022 doi

  205. [216]

    A., Aljasem, M., Lee, B

    Mousavi, M., Caldwell, C., Baltes, J., Parizad, F. A., Aljasem, M., Lee, B. J., & Karimi, N. (2026). Physics -informed neural networks in clean combustion: A pathway to sustainable aerospace propulsion. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 226, 2 58-281. https://doi.org/1...

    2026 doi

  206. [217]

    J., & Zoldak, P

    Molana, M., Darougheh, S., Biglar, A., Chamkha, A. J., & Zoldak, P. (2024). Machine Learning approaches for predicting ignition delay in combustion processes: a comprehensive review. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 63(6), 2509 -2518. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.ie...

    2024 doi

  207. [218]

    Ji, W., & Deng, S. (2021). Autonomous discovery of unknown reaction pathways from data by chemical reaction neural network. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 125(4), 1082-

    2021

  208. [219]

    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.0c09316

    doi

  209. [220]

    Meuwly, M. (2021). Machine learning for chemical reactions. Chemical Reviews, 121(16), 10218-10239. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00033

    2021 doi

  210. [221]

    L., Pawlik, L., Frej, D., & Wilk-Jakubowski, G

    Wilk-Jakubowski, J. L., Pawlik, L., Frej, D., & Wilk-Jakubowski, G. (2025). Data-driven computational methods in fuel combustion: A review of applications. Applied Sciences, 15(13),

    2025

  211. [222]

    https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137204

    doi

  212. [223]

    Wang, Y ., & Zhao, C. (2024). A deep graph convolutional network model of NOx emission prediction for coal‐fired boiler. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 102(2), 669-684. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.25080

    2024 doi

  213. [224]

    Zhang, P., Liu, S., Lu, D., Sankaran, R., & Zhang, G. (2021). An out -of-distribution- aware autoencoder model for reduced chemical kinetics. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems-Series S, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2021138

    2021 doi

  214. [225]

    Y ., Hodges, J

    Lattimer, B. Y ., Hodges, J. L., & Lattimer, A. M. (2020). Using machine learning in physics-based simulation of fire. Fire Safety Journal, 114, 102991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.102991

    2020 doi

  215. [226]

    Su, X., Ji, W., An, J., Ren, Z., Deng, S., & Law, C. K. (2023). Kinetics parameter optimization of hydrocarbon fuels via neural ordinary differential equations. Combustion and Flame, 251, 112732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2023.112732

    2023 doi

  216. [227]

    Naser, M. Z. (2021). Mechanistically informed machine learning and artificial intelligence in fire engineering and sciences. Fire Technology, 57(6), 2741 -2784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-020-01069-8 83

    2021 doi

  217. [228]

    Shateri, A., Yang, Z., Sherkat, N., & Xie, J. (2025). A hybrid molecular dynamics – machine learning framework for boiling point estimation in aromatic fluids. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 106684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2025.106684

    2025 doi

  218. [229]

    F., & Pais, A

    Cova, T. F., & Pais, A. A. (2019). Deep learning for deep chemistry: optimizing the prediction of chemical patterns. Frontiers in chemistry, 7, 809. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00809

    2019 doi

  219. [230]

    K., Sarkar, S., Chakravarthy, S

    Gangopadhyay, T., Ramanan, V ., Akintayo, A., Boor, P. K., Sarkar, S., Chakravarthy, S. R., & Sarkar, S. (2021). 3D convolutional selective autoencoder for instability detection in combustion systems. Energy and AI, 4, 100067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100067

    2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed May 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.