pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25693 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · 💻 cs.AI

RADD: Retrieval-Augmented Discrete Diffusion for Multi-Modal Knowledge Graph Completion

Guanglin Niu , Bo Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 16:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI
keywords multi-modal knowledge graph completiondiscrete diffusionretrieval augmentationknowledge graph embeddingentity rerankingdiffusion models
0
0 comments X

The pith

RADD splits retrieval from reranking with a discrete diffusion denoiser to improve multi-modal knowledge graph completion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Current multi-modal knowledge graph completion models typically use one embedding scorer for both broad candidate search across all entities and final precise decisions, creating a mismatch in what each stage needs. The paper addresses this by introducing a two-stage process: a relation-aware multimodal embedding retriever first pulls a shortlist of candidates, then a conditional discrete denoiser refines the shortlist by learning to generate the correct entity identity. Training combines supervision from knowledge graph embeddings, a denoising cross-entropy loss, and distillation to pass knowledge from the retriever to the denoiser. At test time the retriever guarantees recall while the denoiser focuses on precision. Experiments across three standard benchmarks show consistent gains over unimodal, multimodal, and large-language-model baselines, with ablations confirming each added piece contributes.

Core claim

Decoupling the global retrieval task from the local entity-identity decision task in multi-modal knowledge graph completion, by pairing a relation-aware multimodal KGE retriever with a conditional discrete denoiser trained under combined KGE supervision, denoising cross-entropy, and temperature-scaled distillation, produces higher completion accuracy than any single-scorer architecture.

What carries the argument

The RADD framework: a relation-aware multimodal KGE retriever that supplies top-K candidates and serves as distillation teacher, paired with a conditional discrete denoiser that performs shortlist-level entity generation for reranking.

If this is right

  • RADD records the highest scores on three MMKGC benchmarks while outperforming unimodal, multimodal, and LLM-based baselines.
  • Ablation studies confirm that the retriever, the denoiser, and the distillation step each add measurable value.
  • The designed inference procedure (Diff-Rerank) makes recall a strict prerequisite for precision by forcing the retriever to produce the shortlist first.
  • The combined training objective of KGE supervision, denoising cross-entropy, and temperature-scaled distillation enables the denoiser to inherit useful global knowledge from the retriever.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same retrieve-then-denoise split could be tested on ordinary (non-multi-modal) knowledge graph completion or on related ranking tasks such as entity linking.
  • Because the denoiser operates only on shortlists, the framework may scale more easily to graphs with very large entity vocabularies than a monolithic scorer.
  • Replacing the current discrete diffusion process with other conditional generative models might produce further gains while preserving the retrieval-augmented structure.

Load-bearing premise

The single embedding scorer that must perform both global search and local disambiguation is the main performance bottleneck, and separating the two stages with distillation will improve results without introducing offsetting errors.

What would settle it

Running RADD on the three MMKGC benchmarks and finding no consistent gains over the strongest unimodal, multimodal, or LLM baselines, or finding that ablations removing the denoiser or the distillation step produce no drop in performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25693 by Bo Li, Guanglin Niu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Conventional MMKGC uses one scorer for both high-recall search and fine-grained reranking, two objectives with conflicting inductive biases. RADD decouples them: a KGE retriever handles global search, while a discrete denoiser handles shortlist reranking. recall over the full entity set and resolve delicate ambiguity within a small set of near-tied candi￾dates, yet these subproblems favor different induc￾t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of the RADD framework. The KGE Retriever (left) fuses structural, visual, and textual view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Hyperparameter sensitivity on MKG-W. Each subplot plots MRR, H@1, H@3, and H@10 (%) against view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Most multi-modal knowledge graph completion (MMKGC) models use one embedding scorer to do both retrieval over the full entity set and final decision making. We argue that this coupling is a core bottleneck: global high-recall search and local fine-grained disambiguation require different inductive biases. Therefore, we propose a Retrieval-Augmented Discrete Diffusion (RADD) framework to decouple retrieve and reranking for MMKGC. A relation-aware multimodal KGE retriever serves as both global retriever and distillation teacher, while a conditional discrete denoiser performs shortlist-level entity-identity generation for reranking. Training combines KGE supervision, denoising cross-entropy, and temperature-scaled distillation from the retriever to the denoiser. At inference, the designed Diff-Rerank first forms a top-$K$ shortlist with the retriever and then reranks it with the denoiser, ensuring that recall is a strict prerequisite for precision. Experiments on three MMKGC benchmarks show that RADD achieves the best performance and consistent gains over strong unimodal, multimodal, and LLM-based baselines, while ablations further verify the contribution of each component.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces RADD, a Retrieval-Augmented Discrete Diffusion framework for multi-modal knowledge graph completion (MMKGC). It argues that coupling global retrieval and local decision-making in a single embedding scorer creates an inductive-bias mismatch and proposes to decouple them: a relation-aware multimodal KGE retriever handles global search and serves as distillation teacher, while a conditional discrete denoiser performs shortlist-level entity-identity generation for reranking. Training combines KGE supervision, denoising cross-entropy, and temperature-scaled distillation; inference uses the two-stage Diff-Rerank procedure that first retrieves a top-K shortlist and then reranks it, making recall a prerequisite for precision. The central empirical claim is that RADD attains the best performance on three MMKGC benchmarks, with consistent gains over unimodal, multimodal, and LLM-based baselines, and that ablations confirm the contribution of each component.

Significance. If the reported gains prove robust, the work offers a clear advance for MMKGC by supplying an explicit architectural separation of retrieval and reranking together with a diffusion-based reranker and distillation mechanism. The Diff-Rerank inference procedure directly enforces the recall-then-precision ordering and could influence retrieval-augmented models in other structured-prediction settings. The combination of standard KGE supervision with denoising and distillation losses is technically straightforward yet novel in this domain.

minor comments (3)
  1. Abstract: the claim of 'best performance and consistent gains' would be more informative if one or two concrete metric values (e.g., MRR or Hits@10 deltas) were included to allow readers to gauge the magnitude of improvement before reading the experimental section.
  2. The manuscript should explicitly state the three benchmark datasets, the exact evaluation protocol (filtered vs. raw, data splits), and the full list of baselines with their original references in the experimental section to support reproducibility.
  3. Notation: ensure that 'Diff-Rerank', 'denoiser', and 'retriever' are defined at first use in the main text and that any temperature parameter in the distillation loss is given a symbol and value.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive and constructive review, as well as the recommendation for minor revision. We appreciate the recognition that decoupling retrieval and reranking addresses a core inductive-bias mismatch in MMKGC, and that the Diff-Rerank procedure together with the distillation mechanism offers a clear architectural contribution.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper proposes an empirical framework (RADD) for multi-modal knowledge graph completion that decouples retrieval and reranking via a retriever-denoiser architecture, trained with standard KGE supervision, denoising cross-entropy, and temperature-scaled distillation. Inference uses a two-stage Diff-Rerank procedure. No equations, derivations, or self-citations are presented that reduce the claimed performance gains to fitted parameters or inputs by construction. The motivation for decoupling is presented as a design argument rather than a proven theorem, and results are validated externally on three benchmarks against baselines. The derivation chain is self-contained as an engineering contribution without load-bearing circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that separate inductive biases for retrieval and reranking are beneficial and that the discrete diffusion denoiser can be effectively trained via distillation on shortlists. No explicit free parameters or invented entities are named in the abstract, but the diffusion process and temperature scaling are implicit modeling choices.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5498 in / 1237 out tokens · 46120 ms · 2026-05-07T16:20:22.692242+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    online" 'onlinestring :=

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter edition editor eid eprint eprinttype howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year doi pubmed url lastchecked label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block STRING...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  3. [3]

    Johnson, Jonathan Ho, Daniel Tarlow, and Rianne van den Berg

    Jacob Austin, Daniel D. Johnson, Jonathan Ho, Daniel Tarlow, and Rianne van den Berg. 2021. Structured denoising diffusion models in discrete state-spaces. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

    2021

  4. [4]

    Hospedales

    Ivana Balazevic, Carl Allen, and Timothy M. Hospedales. 2019. Tucker: Tensor factorization for knowledge graph completion. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 5184--5193

    2019

  5. [5]

    Antoine Bordes, Nicolas Usunier, Alberto Garc \'i a-Dur \'a n, Jason Weston, and Oksana Yakhnenko. 2013. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

    2013

  6. [6]

    Liwei Cai and William Yang Wang. 2018. Kbgan: Adversarial learning for knowledge graph embeddings. In North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

    2018

  7. [7]

    Zongsheng Cao, Qianqian Xu, Zhiyong Yang, Yuan He, Xiaochun Cao, and Qingming Huang. 2022. Otkge: Multi-modal knowledge graph embeddings via optimal transport. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

    2022

  8. [8]

    Linlin Chao, Jianshan He, Taifeng Wang, and Wei Chu. 2021. Pairre: Knowledge graph embeddings via paired relation vectors. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

    2021

  9. [9]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.05391 (2024)

    Zhuo Chen, Yichi Zhang, Yin Fang, Yuxia Geng, Lingbing Guo, Xiang Chen, Qian Li, Wen Zhang, Jiaoyan Chen, Yushan Zhu, Jiaqi Li, Xiaoze Liu, Jeff Z. Pan, Ningyu Zhang, and Huajun Chen. 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05391 Knowledge graphs meet multi-modal learning: A comprehensive survey . Preprint, arXiv:2402.05391

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Lingbing Guo, Zhongpu Bo, Zhuo Chen, Yichi Zhang, Jiaoyan Chen, Lan Yarong, Mengshu Sun, Zhiqiang Zhang, Yangyifei Luo, Qian Li, and 1 others. 2024. MKGL : Mastery of a three-word language. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:140509--140534

    2024

  11. [11]

    Lingbing Guo, Yichi Zhang, Zhongpu Bo, Zhuo Chen, Mengshu Sun, Zhiqiang Zhang, Wen Zhang, and Huajun Chen. 2025. K-ON : Stacking knowledge on the head layer of large language model. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 39, pages 11745--11753

    2025

  12. [12]

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. 2020. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

    2020

  13. [13]

    Wei Huang, Meiyu Liang, Peining Li, Xu Hou, Yawen Li, Junping Du, Zhe Xue, and Zeli Guan. 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.06543 Diffusioncom: Structure-aware multimodal diffusion model for multimodal knowledge graph completion . Preprint, arXiv:2504.06543

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Guoliang Ji, Shizhu He, Liheng Xu, Kang Liu, and Jun Zhao. 2015. Knowledge graph embedding via dynamic mapping matrix. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 687--696

    2015

  15. [15]

    Jaejun Lee, Chanyoung Chung, Hochang Lee, Sungho Jo, and Joyce Jiyoung Whang. 2023. Vista: Visual-textual knowledge graph representation learning. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP, pages 7314--7328

    2023

  16. [16]

    Xinhang Li, Xiangyu Zhao, Jiaxing Xu, Yong Zhang, and Chunxiao Xing. 2023. Imf: Interactive multimodal fusion model for link prediction. In The Web Conference, pages 2572--2580

    2023

  17. [17]

    Rosenblum

    Ye Liu, Hui Li, Alberto Garc \'i a-Dur \'a n, Mathias Niepert, Daniel O \ n oro-Rubio, and David S. Rosenblum. 2019. Mmkg: Multi-modal knowledge graphs. In The Semantic Web, pages 459--474

    2019

  18. [18]

    Xinyu Lu, Lifang Wang, Zejun Jiang, Shichang He, and Shizhong Liu. 2022. Mmkrl: A robust embedding approach for multi-modal knowledge graph representation learning. Applied Intelligence, 52(7):7480--7497

    2022

  19. [19]

    Guanglin Niu, Bo Li, and Siling Feng. 2025 a . https://doi.org/10.1109/TBDATA.2025.3588081 A pluggable common sense-enhanced framework for knowledge graph completion . IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 11(6):3282--3299

    work page doi:10.1109/tbdata.2025.3588081 2025

  20. [20]

    Guanglin Niu, Bo Li, and Yangguang Lin. 2025 b . https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11012 A survey of task-oriented knowledge graph reasoning: Status, applications, and prospects . Preprint, arXiv:2506.11012

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Guanglin Niu, Bo Li, and Yangguang Lin. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBDATA.2026.3668633 A comprehensive survey of knowledge graph reasoning: Approaches and applications . IEEE Transactions on Big Data, pages 1--20

    work page doi:10.1109/tbdata.2026.3668633 2026

  22. [22]

    Guanglin Niu and Xiaowei Zhang. 2026. Diffusion-based hierarchical negative sampling for multimodal knowledge graph completion. In Database Systems for Advanced Applications, pages 479--495, Singapore. Springer Nature Singapore

    2026

  23. [23]

    Pouya Pezeshkpour, Liyan Chen, and Sameer Singh. 2018. Embedding multimodal relational data for knowledge base completion. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 3208--3218

    2018

  24. [24]

    Apoorv Saxena, Adrian Kochsiek, and Rainer Gemulla. 2022. Sequence-to-sequence knowledge graph completion and question answering. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 2814--2828

    2022

  25. [25]

    Hatem Mousselly Sergieh, Teresa Botschen, Iryna Gurevych, and Stefan Roth. 2018. A multimodal translation-based approach for knowledge graph representation learning. In *SEM @ NAACL-HLT, pages 225--234

    2018

  26. [26]

    Siyue Su, Jian Yang, Bo Li, and Guanglin Niu. 2026. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22698 Tokenization, fusion and decoupling: Bridging the granularity mismatch between large language models and knowledge graphs . Preprint, arXiv:2602.22698

    work page arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Zhiqing Sun, Zhi-Hong Deng, Jian-Yun Nie, and Jian Tang. 2019. Rotate: Knowledge graph embedding by relational rotation in complex space. In International Conference on Learning Representations

    2019

  28. [28]

    Yun Tang, Jing Huang, Guangtao Wang, Xiaodong He, and Bowen Zhou. 2020. Orthogonal relation transforms with graph context modeling for knowledge graph embedding. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

    2020

  29. [29]

    Th \'e o Trouillon, Johannes Welbl, Sebastian Riedel, \'E ric Gaussier, and Guillaume Bouchard. 2016. Complex embeddings for simple link prediction. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 2071--2080

    2016

  30. [30]

    Meng Wang, Sen Wang, Han Yang, Zheng Zhang, Xi Chen, and Guilin Qi. 2021. Is visual context really helpful for knowledge graph? a representation learning perspective. In ACM Multimedia, pages 2735--2743

    2021

  31. [31]

    Xin Wang, Benyuan Meng, Hong Chen, Yuan Meng, Ke Lv, and Wenwu Zhu. 2023. Tiva-kg: A multimodal knowledge graph with text, image, video and audio. In ACM Multimedia, pages 2391--2399

    2023

  32. [32]

    Zikang Wang, Linjing Li, Qiudan Li, and Daniel Zeng. 2019. Multimodal data enhanced representation learning for knowledge graphs. In International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, pages 1--8

    2019

  33. [33]

    Ruobing Xie, Zhiyuan Liu, Huanbo Luan, and Maosong Sun. 2017. Image-embodied knowledge representation learning. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 3140--3146

    2017

  34. [34]

    Derong Xu, Tong Xu, Shiwei Wu, Jingbo Zhou, and Enhong Chen. 2022. Relation-enhanced negative sampling for multimodal knowledge graph completion. In ACM Multimedia, pages 3857--3866

    2022

  35. [35]

    Bishan Yang, Wen tau Yih, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, and Li Deng. 2015. Embedding entities and relations for learning and inference in knowledge bases. In International Conference on Learning Representations

    2015

  36. [36]

    Liang Yao, Chengsheng Mao, and Yuan Luo. 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.03193 Kg-bert: Bert for knowledge graph completion . Preprint, arXiv:1909.03193

    work page arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Yichi Zhang, Mingyang Chen, and Wen Zhang. 2023. Modality-aware negative sampling for multi-modal knowledge graph embedding. In International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, pages 1--8

    2023

  38. [38]

    Yichi Zhang, Zhuo Chen, Lingbing Guo, Yajing Xu, Binbin Hu, Ziqi Liu, Wen Zhang, and Huajun Chen. 2024 a . Native: Multi-modal knowledge graph completion in the wild. In International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

    2024

  39. [39]

    Yichi Zhang, Zhuo Chen, Lingbing Guo, Yajing Xu, Binbin Hu, Ziqi Liu, Wen Zhang, and Huajun Chen. 2025. Multiple heads are better than one: Mixture of modality knowledge experts for entity representation learning. In International Conference on Learning Representations

    2025

  40. [40]

    Yichi Zhang, Zhuo Chen, Lei Liang, Huajun Chen, and Wen Zhang. 2024 b . Unleashing the power of imbalanced modality information for multi-modal knowledge graph completion. In Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 17120--17130

    2024

  41. [41]

    Yichi Zhang and Wen Zhang. 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07084 Knowledge graph completion with pre-trained multimodal transformer and twins negative sampling . Preprint, arXiv:2209.07084

    work page arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Yu Zhao, Xiangrui Cai, Yike Wu, Haiwei Zhang, Ying Zhang, Guoqing Zhao, and Ning Jiang. 2022. Mose: Modality split and ensemble for multimodal knowledge graph completion. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 10527--10536

    2022

  43. [43]

    Zhaocheng Zhu, Zuobai Zhang, Louis-Pascal A. C. Xhonneux, and Jian Tang. 2021. Neural bellman-ford networks: A general graph neural network framework for link prediction. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 29476--29490

    2021