pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25831 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · 💻 cs.SE

Does social identity matter in software engineering? Assessing the case of research software engineers

Chukwudi Uwasomba , Tamara Lopez , Melanie Langer , Helen Sharp , Michel Wermelinger , Caroline Jay , Mark Levine , Bashar Nuseibeh This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SE
keywords social identityresearch software engineersprofessional wellbeingsoftware engineeringmixed methodscomputational linguisticsprofessional community
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Research software engineers are forming a collective professional identity that shapes their wellbeing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates social identity, the sense of self drawn from group membership, within the community of research software engineers. It applies computational analysis to over 28,000 social media posts and 1,700 blogs alongside survey data from 381 RSEs to track how a shared identity appears and operates. A sympathetic reader would care because the results suggest that belonging to this professional group can directly affect wellbeing at work, pointing to an under-examined lever in technical careers. The mixed-methods design treats linguistic patterns and self-reported data as evidence that the identity is both emerging and consequential.

Core claim

Using computational linguistic analysis of social media posts and blogs together with inferential statistics on survey responses, the study shows that a collective RSE identity is emerging and that this identity influences professional wellbeing.

What carries the argument

The collective RSE identity, detected through linguistic markers in public posts and confirmed by survey responses, as the mechanism connecting group membership to individual wellbeing outcomes.

If this is right

  • Strengthening community practices among RSEs could improve wellbeing indicators such as job satisfaction and retention.
  • Other specialized software engineering roles may develop similar identities that affect daily work experience.
  • Interventions aimed at professional community building in software engineering could be evaluated by tracking identity markers over time.
  • The interdisciplinary link between social psychology and software engineering offers a new lens for studying career sustainability in technical fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar identity dynamics may operate in adjacent roles like data scientists or scientific programmers, warranting parallel studies.
  • If identity formation is causal, early-career RSEs could be supported by structured community onboarding to accelerate wellbeing benefits.
  • The linguistic methods used here could be applied to other online professional forums to detect emerging identities before formal surveys exist.

Load-bearing premise

The combination of linguistic analysis of posts and blogs with survey answers from 381 respondents accurately measures the existence and effects of social identity without major selection bias or unmeasured influences.

What would settle it

A replication study that finds no reliable association between strength of RSE group identification and wellbeing measures once other job and demographic factors are controlled.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25831 by Bashar Nuseibeh, Caroline Jay, Chukwudi Uwasomba, Helen Sharp, Mark Levine, Melanie Langer, Michel Wermelinger, Tamara Lopez.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Autonomy mediating the relationship between so view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Resilience mediating the relationship between so view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Social identity is a concept from psychology that refers to the part of an individual's identity that derives from their group membership(s). In this paper, we explore social identity in members of the professional community of Research Software Engineers (RSEs). Using a mixed-methods approach, our study combined computational linguistic analysis and inferential statistics to examine over 28,000 social media posts, 1,700 blogs, and survey responses from 381 professional RSEs. The findings highlight the emergence of a collective RSE identity and demonstrate its role in shaping professional wellbeing. This study contributes an interdisciplinary perspective by integrating social psychology and software engineering to show how a professional identity evolves and why it matters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript explores the concept of social identity in the context of Research Software Engineers (RSEs) by employing a mixed-methods approach. This includes computational linguistic analysis of more than 28,000 social media posts and 1,700 blogs, alongside inferential statistics applied to survey responses collected from 381 professional RSEs. The central claims are that a collective RSE identity is emerging and that this identity plays a role in shaping the professional wellbeing of RSEs, thereby contributing an interdisciplinary lens combining social psychology and software engineering.

Significance. Should the empirical findings hold under scrutiny, this work would be significant for demonstrating the applicability of social identity theory to software engineering professional communities. It could provide insights into how group membership influences wellbeing in technical fields, potentially guiding community-building efforts and support structures for RSEs. The scale of the data collection (tens of thousands of posts and hundreds of survey responses) represents a substantial effort that, if analyzed rigorously, strengthens the potential contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract claims that the findings 'demonstrate its role in shaping professional wellbeing.' However, the described study design is purely observational, relying on self-selected social media content and voluntary survey participation. No details are provided on controls for potential confounders such as career stage or institutional factors, nor on methods to address reverse causation or selection bias. This is a load-bearing issue for the central claim, as correlational patterns do not suffice to establish a shaping (causal) role.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract describes the data sources and methods only at a high level and supplies no specific results, effect sizes, p-values, model specifications, or validation procedures. Without these, it is not possible to determine whether the data support the claims about the emergence of collective identity or its impact on wellbeing.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract could benefit from a brief mention of key limitations or the specific statistical techniques used to enhance transparency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below and have made revisions to the abstract to clarify the nature of our findings and provide more specific details where feasible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The abstract claims that the findings 'demonstrate its role in shaping professional wellbeing.' However, the described study design is purely observational, relying on self-selected social media content and voluntary survey participation. No details are provided on controls for potential confounders such as career stage or institutional factors, nor on methods to address reverse causation or selection bias. This is a load-bearing issue for the central claim, as correlational patterns do not suffice to establish a shaping (causal) role.

    Authors: We agree that our study design is observational and does not permit causal claims. The linguistic analysis identifies patterns consistent with an emerging collective identity, and the survey data reveal associations between measures of social identity and wellbeing indicators. We do not have experimental controls or longitudinal data to address reverse causation or all potential confounders. Accordingly, we will revise the abstract to replace 'demonstrate its role in shaping professional wellbeing' with 'highlight the emergence of a collective RSE identity and its association with professional wellbeing.' We will also expand the discussion of limitations to explicitly address selection bias and the correlational nature of the results. The manuscript already includes some controls for career stage in the survey analysis, but we acknowledge this does not fully mitigate all confounds. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The abstract describes the data sources and methods only at a high level and supplies no specific results, effect sizes, p-values, model specifications, or validation procedures. Without these, it is not possible to determine whether the data support the claims about the emergence of collective identity or its impact on wellbeing.

    Authors: We recognize that the abstract provides a high-level summary, as is conventional due to length constraints. To address this, we will revise the abstract to include key quantitative details, such as the exact numbers of posts and blogs analyzed, the sample size of the survey, and main statistical outcomes (e.g., significant correlations or regression coefficients from the inferential analysis). Model specifications and validation procedures are detailed in the methods section, but we will add a brief mention of the primary analytical approaches in the abstract. This will allow readers to better assess the support for our claims without needing to read the full text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical mixed-methods study with no derivations or self-referential fits

full rationale

The paper conducts a mixed-methods empirical analysis combining NLP on 28k posts and 1.7k blogs with survey data from 381 RSEs to identify patterns in social identity and wellbeing. No equations, parameter fits, predictions, or uniqueness theorems appear in the provided abstract or description. All claims rest on external data collection and standard statistical/linguistic procedures rather than any self-definition, fitted-input renaming, or self-citation chain that reduces the central result to its own inputs by construction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an empirical social science study; no mathematical free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced. It relies on standard inferential statistics and established social identity concepts from prior psychology literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5434 in / 1080 out tokens · 71117 ms · 2026-05-07T15:59:08.684907+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bibek Acharya and Ricardo Colomo-Palacios. 2019. A systematic literature review on autonomous agile teams. In19th Int’l Conf. on Computational Science and Its Applications, 146–151

    2019

  2. [2]

    Salter Ainsworth, Mary C

    Mary D. Salter Ainsworth, Mary C. Blehar, Everett Waters, and Sally Wall. 1978.Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Lawrence Erlbaum

    1978

  3. [3]

    Alice Allen et al. 2017. Engineering Academic Software (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 16252).Dagstuhl Manifestos, 6, 1, 1–20

    2017

  4. [4]

    Amiot, Deborah J

    Catherine E. Amiot, Deborah J. Terry, Dian. Wirawan, and Tim A. Grice. 2010. Changes in social identities over time: The role of coping and adaptation processes. en.British J. of Social Psychology, 49, 4, (Nov. 2010), 803–826. Does social identity matter in software engineering? EASE 2026, June 9–12, 2026, Glasgow, United Kingdom

    2010

  5. [5]

    Arnold, Nick Turner, Julian Barling, E

    Kathleen A. Arnold, Nick Turner, Julian Barling, E. Kevin Kelloway, and M. Catherine McKee. 2007. Transformational leadership and psychological well-being: the mediating role of meaningful work.J. of occupational health psychology, 12, 3, 193

    2007

  6. [6]

    Arriaga, Mami Kumashiro, Jeffry A

    Ximena B. Arriaga, Mami Kumashiro, Jeffry A. Simpson, and Nickola C. Over- all. 2018. Revising working models across time: relationship situations that enhance attachment security.Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22, 1, 71–96

    2018

  7. [7]

    Emma A Bäck, Hanna Bäck, Marie Gustafsson Sendén, and Sverker Sikström

  8. [8]

    of Social and Political Psychology, 6, 1, 76–91

    From i to we: group formation and linguistic adaption in an online xenophobic forum.J. of Social and Political Psychology, 6, 1, 76–91

  9. [9]

    Andreas Bäckevik, Erik Tholén, and Lucas Gren. 2019. Social identity in software development. In12th Int’l Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering. IEEE, 107–114

    2019

  10. [10]

    Horowitz

    Kim Bartholomew and Leonard M. Horowitz. 1991. Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model.J. of personality and social psychology, 61, 2, 226

    1991

  11. [11]

    Blader and Serena Yu

    Steven L. Blader and Serena Yu. 2017. Are status and respect different or two sides of the same coin?Academy of Management Annals, 11, 2, 800–824

    2017

  12. [12]

    Ronald Bledow, Jonas Kühnel, Michael Jin, and Julius Kuhl. 2021. Breaking the chains: the inverted-u-shaped relationship between action-state orientation and creativity under low job autonomy.J. of Management, 48, 4, 905–935

    2021

  13. [13]

    1969.Attachment and loss, Vol

    John Bowlby. 1969.Attachment and loss, Vol. I: Attachment. (Reprinted 1982). Basic Books

    1969

  14. [14]

    R. L. Boyd. 2017. Psychological text analysis in the digital humanities. InData Analytics in Digital Humanities. Springer International Publishing, 161–189

    2017

  15. [15]

    R. L. Boyd, A. Ashokkumar, S. Seraj, and J. W. Pennebaker. 2022. The develop- ment and psychometric properties of LIWC-22. Tech. rep. University of Texas at Austin. https://www.liwc.app

    2022

  16. [16]

    Alice Boyes. 2020. How to overcome your fear of making mistakes.Harvard Business Review

    2020

  17. [17]

    James A. Breaugh. 1985. The measurement of work autonomy.Human Rela- tions, 38, 6, 551–570

    1985

  18. [18]

    Brooke, Daniel W

    Paul P. Brooke, Daniel W. Russell, and James L. Price. 1988. Discriminant validation of measures of job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment.J. of applied psychology, 73, 2, 139

    1988

  19. [19]

    Caldwell and Phillip R

    Jessica G. Caldwell and Phillip R. Shaver. 2012. Exploring the cognitive- emotional pathways between adult attachment and ego-resiliency.Individual Differences Research, 10, 3

    2012

  20. [20]

    Castillo

    Jamie Cano and Julia X. Castillo. 2004. Factors explaining job satisfaction among faculty.J. of Agricultural education, 45, 3, 65–74

    2004

  21. [21]

    Jeffrey C Carver, Richard P Kendall, Susan E Squires, and Douglass E Post

  22. [22]

    In29th Int’l Conf

    Software development environments for scientific and engineering software: a series of case studies. In29th Int’l Conf. on Software Engineering. IEEE, 550–559

  23. [23]

    Jeffrey C. Carver. 2008. SE-CSE 2008: the first int’l workshop on software engineering for computational science and engineering. InCompanion of the 30th Int’l Conf. on Software Engineering. ACM, 1071–1072

    2008

  24. [24]

    Edward Chen. 2026. AI is threatening science jobs. Which ones are most at risk? en.Nature, 651, 8104, (Feb. 2026), 19–20. doi:10.1038/d41586-026-00444-9

    work page doi:10.1038/d41586-026-00444-9 2026

  25. [25]

    Cindy K Chung and James W Pennebaker. 2008. Revealing dimensions of thinking in open-ended self-descriptions: an automated meaning extraction method for natural language.J. of research in personality, 42, 1, 96–132

    2008

  26. [26]

    Richard I Cook. 2020. Above the line, below the line.Communications of the ACM, 63, 3, 43–46

    2020

  27. [27]

    Crittenden and Andrea Landini

    Patricia M. Crittenden and Andrea Landini. 2011.Assessing adult attachment: A dynamic-maturational approach to discourse analysis. WW Norton & Co

    2011

  28. [28]

    Davis, Stuart Jones, Ann M

    William A. Davis, Stuart Jones, Ann M. Crowell-Kuhnberg, Devin O’Keeffe, Kelly M. Boyle, Stephen B. Klainer, and Steven Yule. 2017. Operative team communication during simulated emergencies: too busy to respond?Surgery, 161, 5, 1348–1356

    2017

  29. [29]

    Diefendorff, Rebecca J

    James M. Diefendorff, Rebecca J. Hall, Robert G. Lord, and Matthew L. Strean

  30. [30]

    of Applied Psychology, 85, 2, 250

    Action–state orientation: construct validity of a revised measure and its relationship to work-related variables.J. of Applied Psychology, 85, 2, 250

  31. [31]

    Torgeir Dingsøyr, Magne Jørgensen, Frode Odde Carlsen, Lena Carlström, Jens Engelsrud, Kine Hansvold, Mari Heibø-Bagheri, Kjetil Røe, and Karl Ove Vika Sørensen. 2022. Enabling autonomous teams and continuous deployment at scale.IT Professional, 24, 6, 47–53

    2022

  32. [32]

    Branscombe, Russell Spears, and Antony S

    Bertjan Doosje, Nyla R. Branscombe, Russell Spears, and Antony S. R. Manstead

  33. [33]

    of personality and social psychology, 75, 4, 872

    Guilty by association: when one’s group has a negative history.J. of personality and social psychology, 75, 4, 872

  34. [34]

    Anthony Downs. 1957. An economic theory of political action in a democracy. J. of political economy, 65, 2, 135–150

    1957

  35. [35]

    Katz, David Klein, Mark Santcroos, Tobias Schlauch, Liz Sexton-Kennedy, and Anthony Truskinger

    Stephan Druskat, Daniel S. Katz, David Klein, Mark Santcroos, Tobias Schlauch, Liz Sexton-Kennedy, and Anthony Truskinger. [n. d.] Policy. https://www.sof tware.ac.uk/blog/credit-and-recognition-research-software-current-state- practice-and-outlook. Accessed 2025-10-23. ()

    2025

  36. [36]

    Fabian Fagerholm and Jürgen Münch. 2012. Developer experience: Concept and definition. InInt’l Conf. on software and system process. IEEE, 73–77

    2012

  37. [37]

    César França, Fabio Q. B. da Silva, and Helen Sharp. 2020. Motivation and satisfaction of software engineers.IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 46, 2, 118–140

    2020

  38. [38]

    César França, Helen Sharp, and Fabio Q. B. da Silva. 2014. Motivated software engineers are engaged and focused, while satisfied ones are happy. In8th Int’l Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement(ESEM ’14) Article 32. ACM, 8 pages

    2014

  39. [39]

    Ghaferi and Justin B

    Amir A. Ghaferi and Justin B. Dimick. 2016. Importance of teamwork, commu- nication and culture on failure-to-rescue in the elderly.J. of British Surgery, 103, 2, e47–e51

    2016

  40. [40]

    Daniel Graziotin and Fabian Fagerholm. 2019. Happiness and the productivity of software engineers.CoRR, abs/1904.08239

    work page arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Michaela Greiler, Margaret-Anne Storey, and Abi Noda. 2022. An actionable framework for understanding and improving developer experience.IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 49, 4, 1411–1425

    2022

  42. [42]

    i” and “we

    Marie Gustafsson Sendén, Torun Lindholm, and Sverker Sikström. 2014. Se- lection bias in choice of words: evaluations of “i” and “we” differ between contexts, but “they” are always worse.Journal of Language and Social Psy- chology, 33, 1, 49–67

    2014

  43. [43]

    Itzhak Harpaz and Xiaocong Fu. 2002. The structure of the meaning of work: a relative stability amidst change.Human relations, 55, 6, 639–667

    2002

  44. [44]

    Alexander Haslam, Genevieve Dingle, and Mei X

    Catherine Haslam, Tegan Cruwys, S. Alexander Haslam, Genevieve Dingle, and Mei X. L. Chang. 2016. Groups 4 health: evidence that a social-identity intervention that builds and strengthens social group membership improves mental health.J. of Affective Disorders, 194, 188–195

    2016

  45. [45]

    Alexander Haslam, Anjana Iyer, Jolanda Jetten, and W

    Catherine Haslam, Alice Holme, S. Alexander Haslam, Anjana Iyer, Jolanda Jetten, and W. H. Williams. 2008. Maintaining group memberships: social identity continuity predicts well-being after stroke.Neuropsychological Reha- bilitation, 18, 671–691

    2008

  46. [46]

    Dingle, and S

    Catherine Haslam, Jolanda Jetten, Tegan Cruwys, Genevieve A. Dingle, and S. Alexander Haslam. 2018.The new psychology of health: Unlocking the social cure. Routledge

    2018

  47. [47]

    Alexander Haslam

    S. Alexander Haslam. 2004.Social identity in organizations: The social identity approach. Sage

    2004

  48. [48]

    Alexander Haslam, Penelope J

    S. Alexander Haslam, Penelope J. Oakes, Katherine J. Reynolds, and John C. Turner. 1999. Social identity salience and the emergence of stereotype consensus.Personality and social psychology bulletin, 25, 7, 809–818

    1999

  49. [49]

    Simon Hettrick. 2016. A not-so-brief history of research software engineers. https://www.software.ac.uk/blog/2016-08-17-not-so-brief-history-researc h-software-engineers-0. Accessed 2025-06-25. (2016)

    2016

  50. [50]

    Lorin Hochstein, Filippo Lanubile, Laura Nolan, and Rafael Prikladnicki. 2023. Developing Your Software Engineering Career: Words of Advice From Sea- soned Professionals.IEEE Software, 40, 05, 29–33

    2023

  51. [51]

    Rashina Hoda, James Noble, and Stuart Marshall. 2013. Self-organizing roles on agile software development teams.IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 39, 3, 422–444

    2013

  52. [52]

    Hogg and Scott A

    Michael A. Hogg and Scott A. Reid. 2006. Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms.Communication Theory, 16, 7–30

    2006

  53. [53]

    2011.Resilience Engineering and Safety Management

    Erik Hollnagel. 2011.Resilience Engineering and Safety Management. Mines Paris Tech

    2011

  54. [54]

    Erik Hollnagel. 2014. Resilience engineering and the built environment.Build- ing Research & Information, 42, 2, 221–228

    2014

  55. [55]

    Hovenden, S.D

    F.M. Hovenden, S.D. Walker, H.C. Sharp, and M. Woodman. 1996. Building quality into scientific software.Software Quality, 5, 25–32

    1996

  56. [56]

    Alexander Haslam, and Catherine Haslam

    Jolanda Jetten, S. Alexander Haslam, and Catherine Haslam. 2012. The case for a social identity analysis of health and well-being. InThe social cure: Identity, health and well-being. Psychology Press, 3–20

    2012

  57. [57]

    Jost, Vasso Chaikalis-Petritsis, Dominic Abrams, Jim Sidanius, Jojan- neke Van Der Toorn, and Christopher Bratt

    John T. Jost, Vasso Chaikalis-Petritsis, Dominic Abrams, Jim Sidanius, Jojan- neke Van Der Toorn, and Christopher Bratt. 2012. Why men (and women) do and don’t rebel: effects of system justification on willingness to protest. Personality and social psychology Bulletin, 38, 2, 197–208

    2012

  58. [58]

    1996.The social psychology of collective action: Identity, injustice and gender

    Caroline Kelly and Sara Breinlinger. 1996.The social psychology of collective action: Identity, injustice and gender. Taylor & Francis US

    1996

  59. [59]

    Klohnen and Sara Bera

    Eva C. Klohnen and Sara Bera. 1998. Behavioral and experiential patterns of avoidantly and securely attached women across adulthood: a 31-year longitu- dinal perspective.J. of personality and social psychology, 74, 1, 211

    1998

  60. [60]

    Miriam Koschate, Elahe Naserian, Luke Dickens, Avelie Stuart, Alessandra Russo, and Mark Levine. 2021. Asia: automated social identity assessment using linguistic style.Behavior Research Methods, 53, 4, 1762–1781

    2021

  61. [61]

    Julius Kuhl. 2000. A functional-design approach to motivation and self-regulation: the dynamics of personality systems interactions. InHandbook of self-regulation. Academic Press, 111–169

    2000

  62. [62]

    Miikka Kuutila et al. 2025. Staying or leaving? how job satisfaction, embedded- ness and antecedents predict turnover intentions of software professionals. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.00869. EASE 2026, June 9–12, 2026, Glasgow, United Kingdom Uwasomba et al

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Jost, Richard Bonneau, Megan MacDuffee Metzger, Sharareh Noorbaloochi, and Duncan Penfold-Brown

    Melanie Langer, John T. Jost, Richard Bonneau, Megan MacDuffee Metzger, Sharareh Noorbaloochi, and Duncan Penfold-Brown. 2019. Digital dissent: An analysis of the motivational contents of tweets from an Occupy Wall Street demonstration.Motivation Science, 5, 1, 14

    2019

  64. [64]

    Casper Lassenius and Torgeir Dingsøyr. 2025. Towards a taxonomy for au- tonomy in large-scale agile software development. (2025). https://arxiv.org/a bs/2503.02651 arXiv: 2503.02651[cs.SE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Kay, and Gail J

    Kelly Laurin, Aaron C. Kay, and Gail J. Fitzsimons. 2012. Reactance versus rationalization: divergent responses to policies that constrain freedom.Psy- chological Science, 23, 2, 205–209

    2012

  66. [66]

    Tamara Lopez, Helen Sharp, Arosha Bandara, Thein Tun, Mark Levine, and Bashar Nuseibeh. 2023. Security responses in software development.ACM Trans. on Software Engineering and Methodology, 32, 3, 1–29

    2023

  67. [67]

    Tamara Lopez, Helen Sharp, Michel Wermelinger, Melanie Langer, Mark Levine, Caroline Jay, Yijun Yu, and Bashar Nuseibeh. 2023. Accounting for socio-technical resilience in software engineering. In16th Int’l Conf. on Coop- erative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering. IEEE, 31–36

    2023

  68. [68]

    T. T. Manning. 2003. Leadership across cultures: attachment style influences. J. of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9, 3, 20–30

    2003

  69. [69]

    G Marion et al. 2022. Modelling: understanding pandemics and how to control them. epidemics 39, 100588. (2022)

    2022

  70. [70]

    Mario Mikulincer. 1997. Adult attachment style and information processing: individual differences in curiosity and cognitive closure.J. of personality and social psychology, 72, 5, 1217

    1997

  71. [71]

    Mario Mikulincer and Phillip R. Shaver. 2003.The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes

    2003

  72. [72]

    Shaver, and Dalit Pereg

    Mario Mikulincer, Phillip R. Shaver, and Dalit Pereg. 2003. Attachment theory and affect regulation: the dynamics, development, and cognitive consequences of attachment-related strategies.Motivation and emotion, 27, 2, 77–102

    2003

  73. [73]

    Nils Brede Moe, Viktoria Stray, Darja Smite, and Marius Mikalsen. 2023. Attractive Workplaces: What are Engineers Looking For?IEEE Software

    2023

  74. [74]

    Muller and Karl-Dieter Opp

    Edward N. Muller and Karl-Dieter Opp. 1986. Rational choice and rebellious collective action.American Political Science Review, 80, 2, 471–487

    1986

  75. [75]

    Nord, Arthur P

    Walter R. Nord, Arthur P. Brief, Judith M. Atieh, and Elizabeth M. Doherty

  76. [76]

    Studying meanings of work: the case of work values. (1990)

    1990

  77. [77]

    Elizabeth O’Carroll. 2021. Building a career path for research software engi- neers. https://research.princeton.edu/news/building-career-path-research- software-engineers. Accessed 2025-06-25. (June 2021)

    2021

  78. [78]

    Chris Parr. 2013. Save your work–give software engineers a career track. Times Higher Education, 15

    2013

  79. [79]

    Urszula Pawlicka-Deger. 2022. Digital humanities needs equality between humanists and technicians. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog /digital-humanities-needs-equality-between-humanists-and-technicians. Accessed 2025-06-25. (July 2022)

    2022

  80. [80]

    Sophie Prentice. 2022. The fear of losing your job. InThe Future of Workplace Fear: How Human Reflex Stands in the Way of Digital Transformation. Apress, 81–97

    2022

Showing first 80 references.