pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25886 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-28 · 💻 cs.MM

Recognition: unknown

MarkIt: Training-Free Visual Markers for Precise Video Temporal Grounding

Pengcheng Fang , Yuxia Chen , Xiaohao Cai
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 14:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.MM
keywords video temporal groundingtraining-freevisual markersquery-to-mask bridgeVid-LLMsmoment retrievalhighlight detection
0
0 comments X

The pith

MarkIt converts videos into query-marked versions with instance masks and frame indices to let Vid-LLMs output more accurate start and end times.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces MarkIt, a training-free method that preprocesses any input video by overlaying visual markers tied to the natural-language query. It parses the query into subject tags, generates matching instance masks via open-vocabulary segmentation, and embeds those masks plus a running frame index into every frame. This turns the hard problem of tracking entities and inferring timestamps across long untrimmed video into a set of explicit visual signals the model can read directly. A sympathetic reader cares because current Vid-LLMs already understand video content well yet still produce loose or wrong temporal boundaries; explicit markers let the same models deliver tighter localization without retraining or architectural changes.

Core claim

MarkIt transforms an input video into a query-conditioned marked video using an annotation-free query-to-mask grounding bridge. The bridge derives a compact set of canonical subject tags from the query through linguistic parsing and normalization, then maps the tags to query-conditioned instance masks with text-conditioned open-vocabulary segmentation. It further embeds lightweight semantic instance markers and a persistent frame index into each frame, converting long-range temporal reasoning into explicit visual cues that existing Vid-LLMs can exploit for more reliable start- and end-time predictions.

What carries the argument

The annotation-free query-to-mask grounding bridge (Q2M-Bridge), which parses a natural-language query into subject tags, produces corresponding instance masks, and embeds semantic markers plus frame indices directly into video frames.

If this is right

  • The marked video format produces state-of-the-art results on multiple moment retrieval and highlight detection benchmarks.
  • The same marked input yields consistent temporal grounding gains across a wide range of existing Vid-LLMs.
  • MarkIt functions as an inference-time plug-and-play addition that requires no changes to model weights.
  • The approach remains fully compatible with subsequent supervised fine-tuning of the underlying Vid-LLM.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The marker approach could be tested on longer videos or multi-shot sequences to check whether persistent frame indices continue to help when entity tracking spans many minutes.
  • Because the bridge relies on open-vocabulary segmentation, performance may vary with the quality of the underlying segmentation model and could be improved by swapping in stronger segmenters.
  • The explicit visual cues might reduce the data needed to fine-tune new Vid-LLMs for temporal tasks, since the model receives direct location signals rather than having to learn them implicitly.

Load-bearing premise

The linguistic parsing and open-vocabulary segmentation steps correctly identify and mask only the query-relevant subjects without creating misleading visual noise that would confuse the Vid-LLM.

What would settle it

Apply MarkIt to a benchmark video where the generated masks highlight the wrong objects, then compare the Vid-LLM's temporal grounding accuracy against the unmarked baseline to see whether performance drops.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25886 by Pengcheng Fang, Xiaohao Cai, Yuxia Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Given a natural-language query, the system first performs syntactic parsing to extract subjects and relations, then view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Qualitative comparison on ActivityNet. Predicted spans vs. ground truth. view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Video temporal grounding (VTG) aims to localize the start and end timestamps of the event described by a given query within an untrimmed video. Despite the strong open-world video understanding and recognition ability of video language large models (Vid-LLMs), outputting precise temporal grounding information remains challenging, since explicit temporal cues are scarce in untrimmed videos, and query-relevant entities are hard to track consistently across the video timeline. In this paper, we present \MarkIt{}, a training-free framework that transforms an input video into a query-conditioned marked video, which empowers Vid-LLMs to generate more reliable temporal localization predictions. The core component of \MarkIt{} is an annotation-free query-to-mask grounding bridge (Q2M-Bridge). Given a natural-language query, it automatically derives a compact set of canonical subject tags through linguistic parsing and normalization, then maps these tags to query-conditioned instance masks using text-conditioned open-vocabulary segmentation. The bridge also embeds lightweight semantic instance markers and a persistent frame index into each frame, effectively transforming long-range temporal reasoning into explicit visual cues for Vid-LLMs. \MarkIt{} adopts an inference-time plug-and-play design, needs no modifications to Vid-LLM weights, and is fully compatible with supervised fine-tuning. Experiments conducted on multiple mainstream moment retrieval and highlight detection benchmarks demonstrate that \MarkIt {} achieves state-of-the-art results, delivering consistent temporal grounding improvements across a wide range of existing models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes MarkIt, a training-free plug-and-play framework that augments untrimmed videos with query-conditioned visual markers to improve temporal grounding in Vid-LLMs. The core is the annotation-free Q2M-Bridge, which parses natural-language queries into canonical subject tags via linguistic processing and maps them to instance masks using open-vocabulary segmentation; these masks are then augmented with lightweight semantic markers and persistent frame indices before being fed to the Vid-LLM. The manuscript claims this yields state-of-the-art results on mainstream moment retrieval and highlight detection benchmarks while remaining compatible with existing models and optional supervised fine-tuning.

Significance. If the Q2M-Bridge produces sufficiently accurate masks, the approach would supply a lightweight, inference-only method to inject explicit spatial-temporal cues into Vid-LLMs, addressing a known weakness in long-range temporal reasoning. The training-free design and broad compatibility constitute clear practical strengths; the reuse of off-the-shelf open-vocabulary segmentation components also avoids the need for new training data or model modifications.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4 (Experiments) and §3.2 (Q2M-Bridge)] §4 (Experiments) and §3.2 (Q2M-Bridge): the SOTA claims rest on the assumption that the generated instance masks are accurate enough to serve as reliable cues rather than noise, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative mask-quality metrics (e.g., IoU against any reference annotations), no failure-case analysis for ambiguous queries or occlusions, and no ablation that isolates the bridge's contribution from the rest of the pipeline. This directly affects whether the reported gains are robust.
  2. [§3.2 (Q2M-Bridge)] §3.2 (Q2M-Bridge): the description of deriving 'canonical subject tags' through linguistic parsing and normalization lacks detail on the exact parser, normalization rules, or handling of multi-subject or negated queries; without such specification or error-rate measurements, it is impossible to assess how often the subsequent open-vocabulary segmentation receives a correct text prompt.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states 'consistent temporal grounding improvements across a wide range of existing models' but the main text should explicitly list the Vid-LLMs tested and report per-model deltas for transparency.
  2. [Notation] Notation for the 'persistent frame index' and 'lightweight semantic instance markers' should be formalized (e.g., how the index is rendered and whether markers are text overlays or visual symbols) to support reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation and strengthen the empirical support for MarkIt. We address each major point below and commit to revisions that improve transparency without altering the core claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4 (Experiments) and §3.2 (Q2M-Bridge)] §4 (Experiments) and §3.2 (Q2M-Bridge): the SOTA claims rest on the assumption that the generated instance masks are accurate enough to serve as reliable cues rather than noise, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative mask-quality metrics (e.g., IoU against any reference annotations), no failure-case analysis for ambiguous queries or occlusions, and no ablation that isolates the bridge's contribution from the rest of the pipeline. This directly affects whether the reported gains are robust.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit ablation isolating the Q2M-Bridge and qualitative failure-case analysis would strengthen the manuscript. The current results demonstrate consistent gains across multiple Vid-LLMs and benchmarks, which indirectly validates the utility of the generated markers; however, we will add (i) an ablation comparing performance with and without the Q2M-Bridge and (ii) a dedicated subsection with representative failure cases for ambiguous queries and occlusions. Regarding quantitative IoU, the moment-retrieval and highlight-detection benchmarks provide only temporal annotations, not per-frame instance masks aligned to the parsed subject tags; therefore we cannot compute reference IoU without introducing new annotations. We will instead report proxy statistics such as mask coverage over query-relevant regions and note this limitation explicitly. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§3.2 (Q2M-Bridge)] §3.2 (Q2M-Bridge): the description of deriving 'canonical subject tags' through linguistic parsing and normalization lacks detail on the exact parser, normalization rules, or handling of multi-subject or negated queries; without such specification or error-rate measurements, it is impossible to assess how often the subsequent open-vocabulary segmentation receives a correct text prompt.

    Authors: We will revise §3.2 to specify the exact pipeline: we employ spaCy for dependency parsing to extract noun phrases as candidate subjects, apply rule-based normalization (lowercasing, lemmatization, removal of determiners and modifiers), and handle multi-subject queries by emitting multiple tags while discarding negated phrases via dependency negation detection. We will also include a small-scale error analysis on 200 randomly sampled queries from the evaluation sets, reporting the percentage of tags that correctly match the intended referent. These additions will make the tag-derivation step fully reproducible and allow readers to gauge prompt quality for the downstream open-vocabulary segmenter. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Quantitative IoU evaluation of the generated masks, because the standard VTG benchmarks supply only temporal ground truth and not query-aligned instance masks.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on external off-the-shelf components

full rationale

The paper describes a training-free plug-and-play pipeline whose core Q2M-Bridge is assembled from pre-existing linguistic parsing/normalization and text-conditioned open-vocabulary segmentation tools. No equations, fitted parameters, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text; the claimed temporal-grounding gains are presented as empirical outcomes on external benchmarks rather than reductions that hold by construction from the method's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that off-the-shelf linguistic parsing and open-vocabulary segmentation produce sufficiently accurate masks and tags; no free parameters are explicitly introduced in the abstract, but the method implicitly depends on the quality of those external models.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Linguistic parsing and normalization reliably extract a compact set of canonical subject tags from arbitrary natural-language queries.
    First step of the Q2M-Bridge.
  • domain assumption Text-conditioned open-vocabulary segmentation can map the extracted tags to accurate query-conditioned instance masks across video frames.
    Core mapping step that enables the marked video.
invented entities (2)
  • Lightweight semantic instance markers no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide explicit visual cues that convert long-range temporal reasoning into per-frame pattern matching.
    New visual element added to each frame.
  • Persistent frame index no independent evidence
    purpose: Embed temporal position information directly into the visual input.
    Embedded into every frame to aid localization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5563 in / 1399 out tokens · 71928 ms · 2026-05-07T14:04:14.961772+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Univtg: Towards unified video-language temporal grounding,

    K. Q. Lin, P. Zhang, J. Chen, S. Pramanick, D. Gao, A. J. Wang, R. Yan, and M. Z. Shou, “Univtg: Towards unified video-language temporal grounding,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 2794–2804

    2023

  2. [2]

    Context-aware biaffine localizing network for temporal sentence grounding,

    D. Liu, X. Qu, J. Dong, P. Zhou, Y . Cheng, W. Wei, Z. Xu, and Y . Xie, “Context-aware biaffine localizing network for temporal sentence grounding,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021, pp. 11 235–11 244

    2021

  3. [3]

    Internvl: Scaling up vision foun- dation models and aligning for generic visual-linguistic tasks,

    Z. Chen, J. Wu, W. Wang, W. Su, G. Chen, S. Xing, M. Zhong, Q. Zhang, X. Zhu, L. Luet al., “Internvl: Scaling up vision foun- dation models and aligning for generic visual-linguistic tasks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2024, pp. 24 185–24 198

    2024

  4. [4]

    Chatvtg: Video temporal grounding via chat with video dialogue large language models,

    M. Qu, X. Chen, W. Liu, A. Li, and Y . Zhao, “Chatvtg: Video temporal grounding via chat with video dialogue large language models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 1847–1856

    2024

  5. [5]

    Vtg-llm: Integrating timestamp knowledge into video llms for enhanced video temporal grounding,

    Y . Guo, J. Liu, M. Li, D. Cheng, X. Tang, D. Sui, Q. Liu, X. Chen, and K. Zhao, “Vtg-llm: Integrating timestamp knowledge into video llms for enhanced video temporal grounding,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, no. 3, 2025, pp. 3302–3310

    2025

  6. [6]

    Timesuite: Improving mllms for long video understanding via grounded tuning,

    X. Zeng, K. Li, C. Wang, X. Li, T. Jiang, Z. Yan, S. Li, Y . Shi, Z. Yue, Y . Wanget al., “Timesuite: Improving mllms for long video understanding via grounded tuning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.19702, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    On the consistency of video large language models in temporal comprehension,

    M. Jung, J. Xiao, B.-T. Zhang, and A. Yao, “On the consistency of video large language models in temporal comprehension,” inPro- ceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 2025, pp. 13 713–13 722

    2025

  8. [8]

    Bridging the gap: A unified video comprehension framework for moment retrieval and highlight detection,

    Y . Xiao, Z. Luo, Y . Liu, Y . Ma, H. Bian, Y . Ji, Y . Yang, and X. Li, “Bridging the gap: A unified video comprehension framework for moment retrieval and highlight detection,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2024, pp. 18 709–18 719

    2024

  9. [9]

    Video-mme: The first-ever comprehensive evaluation benchmark of multi-modal llms in video analysis,

    C. Fu, Y . Dai, Y . Luo, L. Li, S. Ren, R. Zhang, Z. Wang, C. Zhou, Y . Shen, M. Zhanget al., “Video-mme: The first-ever comprehensive evaluation benchmark of multi-modal llms in video analysis,” inPro- ceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 2025, pp. 24 108–24 118

    2025

  10. [10]

    LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer

    B. Li, Y . Zhang, D. Guo, R. Zhang, F. Li, H. Zhang, K. Zhang, P. Zhang, Y . Li, Z. Liuet al., “Llava-onevision: Easy visual task transfer,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03326, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Zero-shot video moment retrieval via off-the-shelf multimodal large language models,

    Y . Xu, Y . Sun, B. Zhai, M. Li, W. Liang, Y . Li, and S. Du, “Zero-shot video moment retrieval via off-the-shelf multimodal large language models,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, no. 9, 2025, pp. 8978–8986

    2025

  12. [12]

    Background-aware moment detection for video moment retrieval,

    M. Jung, Y . Jang, S. Choi, J. Kim, J.-H. Kim, and B.-T. Zhang, “Background-aware moment detection for video moment retrieval,” in2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). IEEE, 2025, pp. 8586–8596

    2025

  13. [13]

    Dense video captioning: A survey of techniques, datasets and evaluation protocols,

    I. Qasim, A. Horsch, and D. Prasad, “Dense video captioning: A survey of techniques, datasets and evaluation protocols,”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1–36, 2025

    2025

  14. [14]

    Dense video captioning using unsupervised semantic information,

    V . Estevam, R. Laroca, H. Pedrini, and D. Menotti, “Dense video captioning using unsupervised semantic information,”Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, vol. 107, p. 104385, 2025

    2025

  15. [15]

    Lvd-2m: A long-take video dataset with temporally dense captions,

    T. Xiong, Y . Wang, D. Zhou, Z. Lin, J. Feng, and X. Liu, “Lvd-2m: A long-take video dataset with temporally dense captions,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 16 623–16 644, 2024

    2024

  16. [16]

    Unsupervised video highlight detection by learning from audio and visual recurrence,

    Z. Islam, S. Paul, and M. Rochan, “Unsupervised video highlight detection by learning from audio and visual recurrence,” in2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). IEEE, 2025, pp. 8702–8711

    2025

  17. [17]

    Less is more: Learning highlight detection from video duration,

    B. Xiong, Y . Kalantidis, D. Ghadiyaram, and K. Grauman, “Less is more: Learning highlight detection from video duration,” inProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019, pp. 1258–1267

    2019

  18. [18]

    Contrastive learn- ing for unsupervised video highlight detection,

    T. Badamdorj, M. Rochan, Y . Wang, and L. Cheng, “Contrastive learn- ing for unsupervised video highlight detection,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 14 042–14 052

    2022

  19. [19]

    Query-dependent video representation for moment retrieval and highlight detection,

    W. Moon, S. Hyun, S. Park, D. Park, and J.-P. Heo, “Query-dependent video representation for moment retrieval and highlight detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2023, pp. 23 023–23 033

    2023

  20. [20]

    Tvqa+: Spatio-temporal grounding for video question answering,

    J. Lei, L. Yu, T. Berg, and M. Bansal, “Tvqa+: Spatio-temporal grounding for video question answering,” inProceedings of the 58th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, 2020, pp. 8211–8225

    2020

  21. [21]

    Timecraft: Navigate weakly-supervised temporal grounded video question answering via bi-directional reasoning,

    H. Liu, X. Ma, C. Zhong, Y . Zhang, and W. Lin, “Timecraft: Navigate weakly-supervised temporal grounded video question answering via bi-directional reasoning,” inEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2024, pp. 92–107

    2024

  22. [22]

    Grounded question-answering in long egocentric videos,

    S. Di and W. Xie, “Grounded question-answering in long egocentric videos,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 12 934–12 943

    2024

  23. [23]

    Can i trust your answer? visually grounded video question answering,

    J. Xiao, A. Yao, Y . Li, and T.-S. Chua, “Can i trust your answer? visually grounded video question answering,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 13 204–13 214

    2024

  24. [24]

    A survey on video temporal grounding with multimodal large lan- guage model,

    J. Wu, W. Liu, Y . Liu, M. Liu, L. Nie, Z. Lin, and C. W. Chen, “A survey on video temporal grounding with multimodal large lan- guage model,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2025

    2025

  25. [25]

    Tar-tvg: Enhancing vlms with timestamp anchor-constrained reasoning for temporal video grounding,

    C. Guo, X. Mo, Y . Nie, X. Xu, C. Xu, F. Yu, and C. Long, “Tar-tvg: Enhancing vlms with timestamp anchor-constrained reasoning for temporal video grounding,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.07683, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Alvarez, Lei Zhang, and Zhiding Yu

    S. Wang, G. Chen, D.-a. Huang, Z. Li, M. Li, G. Li, J. M. Alvarez, L. Zhang, and Z. Yu, “Videoitg: Multimodal video understanding with instructed temporal grounding,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.13353, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Towards visual-prompt temporal answer grounding in instructional video,

    S. Li, B. Li, B. Sun, and Y . Weng, “Towards visual-prompt temporal answer grounding in instructional video,”IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 8836–8853, 2024

    2024

  28. [28]

    Number it: Temporal grounding videos like flipping manga,

    Y . Wu, X. Hu, Y . Sun, Y . Zhou, W. Zhu, F. Rao, B. Schiele, and X. Yang, “Number it: Temporal grounding videos like flipping manga,” inProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 2025, pp. 13 754–13 765

    2025

  29. [29]

    Vtimellm: Empower llm to grasp video moments,

    B. Huang, X. Wang, H. Chen, Z. Song, and W. Zhu, “Vtimellm: Empower llm to grasp video moments,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 14 271–14 280

    2024

  30. [30]

    Timechat: A time-sensitive multimodal large language model for long video understanding,

    S. Ren, L. Yao, S. Li, X. Sun, and L. Hou, “Timechat: A time-sensitive multimodal large language model for long video understanding,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 14 313–14 323

    2024

  31. [31]

    Training-free video temporal grounding using large-scale pre-trained models,

    M. Zheng, X. Cai, Q. Chen, Y . Peng, and Y . Liu, “Training-free video temporal grounding using large-scale pre-trained models,” inEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2024, pp. 20–37

    2024

  32. [32]

    Trace: Temporal grounding video llm via causal event modeling,

    Y . Guo, J. Liu, M. Li, Q. Liu, X. Chen, and X. Tang, “Trace: Temporal grounding video llm via causal event modeling,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.05643, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Omni-rgpt: Unifying image and video region-level understanding via token marks,

    M. Heo, M.-H. Chen, D.-A. Huang, S. Liu, S. Radhakrishnan, S. J. Kim, Y .-C. F. Wang, and R. Hachiuma, “Omni-rgpt: Unifying image and video region-level understanding via token marks,” inProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 2025, pp. 3919–3930

    2025

  34. [34]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04001 , year=

    H. Yuan, X. Li, T. Zhang, Y . Sun, Z. Huang, S. Xu, S. Ji, Y . Tong, L. Qi, J. Fenget al., “Sa2va: Marrying sam2 with llava for dense grounded understanding of images and videos,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04001, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Sa2va- i: Improving sa2va results with consistent training and inference,

    A. Nekrasov, A. Athar, D. de Geus, A. Hermans, and B. Leibe, “Sa2va- i: Improving sa2va results with consistent training and inference,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.19082, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Videoglamm: A large multimodal model for pixel-level visual grounding in videos,

    S. Munasinghe, H. Gani, W. Zhu, J. Cao, E. Xing, F. S. Khan, and S. Khan, “Videoglamm: A large multimodal model for pixel-level visual grounding in videos,” inProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 2025, pp. 19 036–19 046

    2025

  37. [37]

    Videorefer suite: Advancing spatial- temporal object understanding with video llm,

    Y . Yuan, H. Zhang, W. Li, Z. Cheng, B. Zhang, L. Li, X. Li, D. Zhao, W. Zhang, Y . Zhuanget al., “Videorefer suite: Advancing spatial- temporal object understanding with video llm,” inProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 2025, pp. 18 970–18 980

    2025

  38. [38]

    Vip-llava: Making large multimodal models understand arbitrary visual prompts,

    M. Cai, H. Liu, S. K. Mustikovela, G. P. Meyer, Y . Chai, D. Park, and Y . J. Lee, “Vip-llava: Making large multimodal models understand arbitrary visual prompts,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 12 914–12 923

    2024

  39. [39]

    Generalized decoding for pixel, image, and language,

    X. Zou, Z.-Y . Dou, J. Yang, Z. Gan, L. Li, C. Li, X. Dai, H. Behl, J. Wang, L. Yuanet al., “Generalized decoding for pixel, image, and language,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2023, pp. 15 116–15 127

    2023

  40. [40]

    Gsva: Generalized segmentation via multimodal large language models,

    Z. Xia, D. Han, Y . Han, X. Pan, S. Song, and G. Huang, “Gsva: Generalized segmentation via multimodal large language models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 3858–3869

    2024

  41. [41]

    Glamm: Pixel grounding large multimodal model,

    H. Rasheed, M. Maaz, S. Shaji, A. Shaker, S. Khan, H. Cholakkal, R. M. Anwer, E. Xing, M.-H. Yang, and F. S. Khan, “Glamm: Pixel grounding large multimodal model,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 13 009–13 018

    2024

  42. [42]

    Lisa: Rea- soning segmentation via large language model,

    X. Lai, Z. Tian, Y . Chen, Y . Li, Y . Yuan, S. Liu, and J. Jia, “Lisa: Rea- soning segmentation via large language model,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 9579–9589

    2024

  43. [43]

    Collavo: Crayon large language and vision model,

    B.-K. Lee, B. Park, C. W. Kim, and Y . M. Ro, “Collavo: Crayon large language and vision model,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.11248, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Segment anything,

    A. Kirillov, E. Mintun, N. Ravi, H. Mao, C. Rolland, L. Gustafson, T. Xiao, S. Whitehead, A. C. Berg, W.-Y . Loet al., “Segment anything,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2023, pp. 4015–4026

    2023

  45. [45]

    SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videos

    N. Ravi, V . Gabeur, Y .-T. Hu, R. Hu, C. Ryali, T. Ma, H. Khedr, R. R ¨adle, C. Rolland, L. Gustafsonet al., “Sam 2: Segment anything in images and videos,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.00714, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    GroundingGPT: Language enhanced multi-modal grounding model,

    Z. Li, Q. Xu, D. Zhang, H. Song, Y . Cai, Q. Qi, R. Zhou, J. Pan, Z. Li, V . Tu, Z. Huang, and T. Wang, “GroundingGPT: Language enhanced multi-modal grounding model,” inProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Bangkok, Thailand: Association for Computational Linguistics, Aug. 2024, pp...

    2024

  47. [47]

    Lita: Language instructed temporal-localization assistant,

    D.-A. Huang, S. Liao, S. Radhakrishnan, H. Yin, P. Molchanov, Z. Yu, and J. Kautz, “Lita: Language instructed temporal-localization assistant,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.19046

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Vtg-llm: Integrating timestamp knowl- edge into video llms for enhanced video temporal grounding,

    Y . Guo, J. Liu, M. Li, D. Cheng, X. Tang, D. Sui, Q. Liu, X. Chen, and K. Zhao, “Vtg-llm: Integrating timestamp knowledge into video llms for enhanced video temporal grounding,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13382

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Timechat: A time-sensitive multimodal large language model for long video understanding,

    S. Ren, L. Yao, S. Li, X. Sun, and L. Hou, “Timechat: A time-sensitive multimodal large language model for long video understanding,”

  50. [50]

    Timechat: A time-sensitive multimodal large lan- guage model for long video understanding

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.02051

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    Vtimellm: Empower LLM to grasp video moments

    B. Huang, X. Wang, H. Chen, Z. Song, and W. Zhu, “Vtimellm: Empower llm to grasp video moments,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18445

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Momentor: Ad- vancing video large language model with fine-grained temporal reasoning,

    L. Qian, J. Li, Y . Wu, Y . Ye, H. Fei, T.-S. Chua, Y . Zhuang, and S. Tang, “Momentor: Advancing video large language model with fine-grained temporal reasoning,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11435

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Hawkeye: Training video-text llms for grounding text in videos,

    Y . Wang, X. Meng, J. Liang, Y . Wang, Q. Liu, and D. Zhao, “Hawkeye: Training video-text llms for grounding text in videos,”

  54. [54]

    Hawkeye: Training video-text llms for grounding text in videos,

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.10228

    work page arXiv

  55. [55]

    Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution

    P. Wang, S. Bai, S. Tan, S. Wang, Z. Fan, J. Bai, K. Chen, X. Liu, J. Wang, W. Ge, Y . Fan, K. Dang, M. Du, X. Ren, R. Men, D. Liu, C. Zhou, J. Zhou, and J. Lin, “Qwen2-vl: Enhancing vision-language model’s perception of the world at any resolution,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12191

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  56. [57]

    Tall: Temporal activity local- ization via language query,

    J. Gao, C. Sun, Z. Yang, and R. Nevatia, “Tall: Temporal activity local- ization via language query,” inProceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2017, pp. 5267–5275

    2017

  57. [58]

    Activitynet: A large-scale video benchmark for human activity under- standing,

    F. Caba Heilbron, V . Escorcia, B. Ghanem, and J. Carlos Niebles, “Activitynet: A large-scale video benchmark for human activity under- standing,” inProceedings of the ieee conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2015, pp. 961–970

    2015

  58. [59]

    Detecting moments and highlights in videos via natural language queries,

    J. Lei, T. L. Berg, and M. Bansal, “Detecting moments and highlights in videos via natural language queries,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, pp. 11 846–11 858, 2021

    2021

  59. [60]

    Long Context Transfer from Language to Vision

    P. Zhang, K. Zhang, B. Li, G. Zeng, J. Yang, Y . Zhang, Z. Wang, H. Tan, C. Li, and Z. Liu, “Long context transfer from language to vision,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.16852, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  60. [61]

    Yoloe: Real-time seeing anything.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07465, 2025

    A. Wang, L. Liu, H. Chen, Z. Lin, J. Han, and G. Ding, “Yoloe: Real-time seeing anything,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07465, 2025. Appendix

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [62]

    Two men both dressed in athletic gear are standing and talking in an indoor weight lifting gym filled with other equipment

    Prompt Templates: System Message for Normal- ized Subject Extraction You are an NLP tool for extracting normalized visual subjects for open-vocabulary object detection. ,→ ,→ The input is an English sentence describing an action in a video.,→ Your job is to return ONLY the grammatical subject(s), normalized into simple noun classes. ,→ ,→ Important: - The...

  62. [63]

    Overall trends are consistent with those observed on ActivityNet

    Additional Analysis on Frame-index Rendering (Charades-STA) Table 5 reports the corresponding ablation study on Charades-STA. Overall trends are consistent with those observed on ActivityNet. Specifically, fixed-corner place- ments yield comparable performance, while center placement remains suboptimal, suggesting that intrusive overlays may interfere wit...

  63. [64]

    Table 6 reports the effect of different color parameteriza- tions on ActivityNet

    Ablation on Color Parameterization Since visual attention models treat color contrast as a primary cue and integrate it with intensity and orientation to form saliency, we examine whether different color param- eterizations of MARKITmasks affect how reliably region markers attract attention during temporal grounding. Table 6 reports the effect of differen...