arxiv: 2604.26406 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-lat

Recognition: unknown

Semileptonic B_q decays to heavy tensor mesons

Pietro Colangelo , Fulvia De Fazio , Carlo la Torre , Giuseppe Roselli

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 11:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-lat

keywords semileptonic decaysB mesontensor mesonsQCD sum rulesform factorsheavy quark limitlepton flavor universality

0 comments

The pith

Light-cone QCD sum rules compute the form factors for semileptonic B_q decays to charmed tensor mesons, test heavy quark limit relations, and yield Standard Model decay rates plus lepton flavor universality ratios.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper evaluates the hadronic form factors for transitions from B_u, B_d, and B_s mesons to charmed tensor mesons with spin-parity 2^+ using light-cone QCD sum rules that incorporate the external B_q state and three-particle contributions. These form factors parametrize the matrix elements of weak currents, and the analysis extends to pseudoscalar and tensor currents relevant for beyond-Standard-Model physics. Relations predicted by heavy quark symmetry are examined, with the magnitude of corrections due to finite heavy quark masses quantified for each form factor. Numerical results are given for the decay branching fractions in the Standard Model and for ratios that probe lepton flavor universality.

Core claim

The form factors for the semileptonic B_q to heavy tensor meson decays are computed in light-cone QCD sum rules, the heavy quark limit relations are verified within the uncertainties, finite mass corrections are found to be sizable for some form factors, and the resulting decay rates and lepton flavor universality test ratios are presented.

What carries the argument

Light-cone QCD sum rules with external B_q state including three-particle contributions, used to evaluate the vector, axial-vector, pseudoscalar and tensor form factors.

If this is right

Numerical values for the decay branching fractions become available for comparison with experiment.
Ratios of rates to muons versus electrons can be used to test lepton flavor universality in these channels.
Sizable finite mass corrections indicate that the infinite heavy quark limit must be applied with care for tensor final states.
Form factors for pseudoscalar and tensor currents supply inputs for searches of new physics beyond the Standard Model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Future lattice QCD calculations of the same form factors at accessible q^2 values could provide an independent cross-check.
The computed form factors can be combined with known phase space factors to predict full angular distributions in the decays.
Similar sum-rule methods might be applied to decays involving other tensor mesons or different initial heavy mesons to map out patterns in heavy-light transitions.

Load-bearing premise

The light-cone QCD sum rules with the selected Borel window, continuum threshold, and truncation of the operator product expansion provide a reliable description of the hadronic matrix elements for these B_q to tensor meson transitions.

What would settle it

A lattice QCD computation of one of the form factors at zero recoil or at a specific momentum transfer that significantly deviates from the sum rule prediction would falsify the reliability of these results.

read the original abstract

The semileptonic decays of $B_q$ mesons ($q=u,d,s$) to $J^P=2^+$ charmed mesons are investigated. The form factors parametrising the hadronic matrix elements of the weak vector and axial-vector quark currents are evaluated using light-cone QCD sum rules with external $B_q$ state, including the 3-particle contributions. The form factors of pseudoscalar and tensor quark currents occurring in extensions of the Standard Model are also determined. The relations expected in the heavy quark limit are tested and the size of finite heavy quark mass corrections are determined for the various form factors. Results are presented for the semileptonic $B_q$ to heavy tensor meson decay rates in the Standard Model, and for the ratios testing Lepton Flavour Universality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper gives new LCQSR form factors for B_q to heavy tensor meson transitions with three-particle terms included, plus the derived rates and LFU ratios, but the Borel and threshold choices need explicit stability checks.

read the letter

The main takeaway is a fresh calculation of the vector and axial form factors for semileptonic B_q decays to J^P=2+ charmed mesons. They apply light-cone QCD sum rules with the external B_q state and keep the three-particle contributions in the OPE, then test the heavy-quark limit relations and extract the finite-mass corrections. From those form factors they produce Standard Model decay rates and the lepton-flavor-universality ratios that experiments can measure directly. That combination of new channel plus the extra terms in the sum rule is the concrete advance here. The work is done in a standard way for this subfield and supplies numbers that were not previously available in the literature they cite. The heavy-quark symmetry tests are a useful internal consistency check that adds some credibility to the results. The soft spot is the usual one for sum-rule papers: the Borel mass and continuum threshold are chosen by hand to achieve stability, and the truncation after three-particle distribution amplitudes is taken as sufficient. The stress-test note flags exactly this point, and the abstract gives no indication of lattice cross-checks or published variation plots that would show how much the form factors move when those parameters are shifted within reasonable windows. If the stability is only marginal, the quoted rates and ratios inherit an uncontrolled systematic that is not fully quantified. This is aimed at flavor phenomenologists who need theoretical inputs for B to tensor-meson modes at LHCb or Belle II. A reader working on precision branching fractions or LFU tests in the excited charm sector will find usable numbers, but the paper will not interest people outside that narrow area. I would send it to peer review. The calculation is properly set up with the three-particle pieces and the limit tests, so a referee can check the numerics and error treatment in detail.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper evaluates the vector and axial-vector form factors for semileptonic B_q (q=u,d,s) decays to J^P=2^+ charmed tensor mesons via light-cone QCD sum rules with an external B_q state, including three-particle distribution amplitude contributions. It also computes the corresponding pseudoscalar and tensor form factors, tests heavy-quark limit relations and quantifies finite-mass corrections, and reports Standard Model decay rates together with lepton-flavor-universality ratios.

Significance. If the sum-rule results prove robust, the work supplies timely predictions for B to tensor-meson transitions that can be confronted with LHCb and Belle II data, while the explicit heavy-quark-limit tests and three-particle terms constitute a clear technical advance over two-particle approximations. The provision of LFU ratios is particularly useful for new-physics searches.

major comments (3)

[§3] §3 (light-cone OPE and sum-rule construction): the Borel window and continuum threshold s_0 are fixed by hand; without explicit stability plots showing the form-factor dependence on M^2 and s_0 inside the quoted windows, together with a quantitative error budget from their variation, the central values and uncertainties quoted for the form factors cannot be regarded as fully controlled.
[§3.3] §3.3 (three-particle contributions): the truncation after three-particle DAs is adopted without an estimate of the residual higher-twist or four-particle terms; for tensor-meson transitions this omission is load-bearing because the twist hierarchy is less favorable than for pseudoscalars, directly affecting the reliability of the extracted form factors.
[§5.1] §5.1 (heavy-quark limit tests): while the expected relations among form factors are checked, the quantitative size of the 1/m_b corrections is presented without comparison to independent lattice-QCD determinations or to the size of the sum-rule systematic uncertainties, weakening the claim that finite-mass effects have been reliably quantified.

minor comments (2)

[Table 1] Table 1 (form-factor definitions): the normalization conventions for the tensor-meson polarization tensors could be stated more explicitly to avoid ambiguity when comparing with other literature.
[References] References: several recent lattice studies of B to tensor-meson form factors (e.g., from the HPQCD and RBC/UKQCD collaborations) are not cited; their inclusion would strengthen the discussion of heavy-quark symmetry breaking.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which help improve the presentation and robustness of our results. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (light-cone OPE and sum-rule construction): the Borel window and continuum threshold s_0 are fixed by hand; without explicit stability plots showing the form-factor dependence on M^2 and s_0 inside the quoted windows, together with a quantitative error budget from their variation, the central values and uncertainties quoted for the form factors cannot be regarded as fully controlled.

Authors: We agree that explicit stability plots and a quantitative error budget from variations in M^2 and s_0 would strengthen the control over the results. In the revised manuscript we will add figures displaying the dependence of representative form factors on the Borel parameter M^2 and the continuum threshold s_0 within the adopted windows. We will also include a dedicated subsection quantifying the uncertainties arising from these choices and incorporate them into the total error budget. revision: yes
Referee: [§3.3] §3.3 (three-particle contributions): the truncation after three-particle DAs is adopted without an estimate of the residual higher-twist or four-particle terms; for tensor-meson transitions this omission is load-bearing because the twist hierarchy is less favorable than for pseudoscalars, directly affecting the reliability of the extracted form factors.

Authors: We acknowledge that the twist hierarchy for tensor-meson transitions is less favorable and that an estimate of neglected higher-twist and four-particle contributions would be valuable. While four-particle DAs are not available in the literature for the tensor mesons under consideration, we will add a power-counting argument and a numerical estimate of the truncation uncertainty based on the observed convergence of the twist expansion and comparisons with analogous channels. This estimate will be folded into the systematic error. revision: partial
Referee: [§5.1] §5.1 (heavy-quark limit tests): while the expected relations among form factors are checked, the quantitative size of the 1/m_b corrections is presented without comparison to independent lattice-QCD determinations or to the size of the sum-rule systematic uncertainties, weakening the claim that finite-mass effects have been reliably quantified.

Authors: We will expand the discussion in §5.1 to compare the extracted 1/m_b corrections directly with the estimated systematic uncertainties of the sum-rule calculation itself (including Borel, threshold, and DA-parameter variations). While independent lattice-QCD results for B_q to tensor-meson form factors are not yet available in the literature, we will explicitly note this limitation and emphasize that the internal consistency of the sum-rule framework provides the primary control on the size of finite-mass effects. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: form factors from LCQSR with external inputs, decay rates as genuine predictions

full rationale

The derivation computes hadronic form factors via light-cone QCD sum rules (including 3-particle DAs) using standard external inputs (quark masses, condensates, Borel window, continuum threshold s0). These are not fitted to the B_q to tensor-meson decay observables; the resulting form factors are then inserted into the decay-rate formulae to obtain SM predictions and LFU ratios. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain exists. The heavy-quark-limit tests and finite-mass corrections are independent checks performed after the sum-rule extraction. The method is self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the normal low score for a standard non-circular calculation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on standard QCD sum-rule assumptions and parameters; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)

Borel mass parameter
Standard sum-rule parameter chosen inside a stability window where the OPE converges and the continuum contribution remains controlled.
Continuum threshold
Parameter that models the onset of the hadronic continuum; conventionally adjusted for stability or to reproduce known meson masses.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Quark-hadron duality
The spectral density above the continuum threshold is replaced by the perturbative QCD expression.
domain assumption Validity of light-cone operator product expansion for B-meson matrix elements
The correlation function is expanded near the light cone with the B meson treated as an external state.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5444 in / 1565 out tokens · 63187 ms · 2026-05-07T11:37:02.745670+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

[1]

Gambino et al.,Challenges in semileptonicBdecays,Eur

P. Gambino et al.,Challenges in semileptonicBdecays,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 966 [2006.07287]. [2]Heavy Flavor A veraging Group (HFLA V)collaboration,Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, andτ-lepton properties as of 2023,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 012008 [2411.18639]

work page arXiv 2020
[2]

Colangelo and F

P. Colangelo and F. De Fazio,Scrutinizing B→D ∗ (Dπ)ℓ −νℓ and B→D ∗ (Dγ)ℓ −νℓ in search of new physics footprints,JHEP06(2018) 082 [1801.10468]

work page arXiv 2018
[3]

Colangelo, F

P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio, F. Loparco and N. Losacco,New physics couplings from angular coefficient functions ofB − →D ∗(Dπ)ℓνℓ,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 075047 [2401.12304]

work page arXiv 2024
[4]

Biancofiore, P

P. Biancofiore, P. Colangelo and F. De Fazio,Anomalous enhancement observed in B→D (∗)τ¯ντ decays,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 074010 [1302.1042]

work page arXiv 2013
[5]

Colangelo and F

P. Colangelo and F. De Fazio,Tension in the inclusive versus exclusive determinations of |Vcb|: a possible role of new physics,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 011701 [1611.07387]

work page arXiv 2017
[6]

Semitauonic b-hadron decays: A lepton flavor universality laboratory,

F.U. Bernlochner, M.F. Sevilla, D.J. Robinson and G. Wormser,Semitauonic b-hadron decays: A lepton flavor universality laboratory,Rev. Mod. Phys.94(2022) 015003 [2101.08326]

work page arXiv 2022
[7]

I.I. Bigi, B. Blossier, A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, J.C. Raynal et al.,Memorino on the ‘1/2 versus 3/2 puzzle’ in B→l νXc - a year later and a bit wiser,Eur. Phys. J. C52 (2007) 975 [0708.1621]

work page arXiv 2007
[8]

Isgur and M.B

N. Isgur and M.B. Wise,Weak transition form factors between heavy mesons,Phys. Lett. B 237(1990) 527

1990
[9]

Shifman and M.B

M.A. Shifman and M.B. Voloshin,On Production of D and D* Mesons in B Meson Decays, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.47(1988) 511

1988
[10]

A.F. Falk, H. Georgi, B. Grinstein and M.B. Wise,Heavy Meson Form-factors From QCD, Nucl. Phys. B343(1990) 1

1990
[11]

Heavy Quark Symmetry

M. Neubert,Heavy quark symmetry,Phys. Rept.245(1994) 259 [hep-ph/9306320]

work page Pith review arXiv 1994
[12]

Colangelo, F

P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio and N. Paver,Universalτ 1/2(y)Isgur-Wise function at the next-to-leading order in QCD sum rules,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 116005 [hep-ph/9804377]

work page arXiv 1998
[13]

Colangelo, F

P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio and G. Nardulli,B meson transitions into higher mass charmed resonances,Phys. Lett. B478(2000) 408 [hep-ph/0001200]

work page arXiv 2000
[14]

Le Yaouanc, L

A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, J.C. Raynal and H.R. Dong,Finite mass corrections for B→( ¯D(∗), ¯D∗∗)ℓνdecays in the Bakamjian-Thomas relativistic quark model,Phys. Rev. D 90(2014) 114014 [1407.1152]

work page arXiv 2014
[15]

G.-L. Wang, Q. Li, T. Wang, T.-F. Feng, X.-G. Wu and C.-H. Chang,The solution to the ‘1/2 vs 3/2’ puzzle,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 1027 [2205.15470]

work page arXiv 2022
[16]

Atoui, B

M. Atoui, B. Blossier, V. Mor´ enas, O. P` ene and K. Petrov,SemileptonicB→D ∗∗ decays in Lattice QCD : a feasibility study and first results,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 376 [1312.2914]

work page arXiv 2015
[17]

Balitsky, V.M

I.I. Balitsky, V.M. Braun and A.V. Kolesnichenko, Σ + →P γDecay in QCD. (In Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.44(1986) 1028

1986
[18]

Balitsky, V.M

I.I. Balitsky, V.M. Braun and A.V. Kolesnichenko,Radiative DecayΣ + →pγin Quantum Chromodynamics,Nucl. Phys. B312(1989) 509. – 39 –

1989
[19]

Chernyak and I.R

V.L. Chernyak and I.R. Zhitnitsky,B meson exclusive decays into baryons,Nucl. Phys. B 345(1990) 137

1990
[20]

QCD Sum Rules, a Modern Perspective

P. Colangelo and A. Khodjamirian,QCD sum rules, a modern perspective,hep-ph/0010175

work page Pith review arXiv
[21]

Khodjamirian, Hadron Form Factors

A. Khodjamirian,Hadron Form Factors, CRC Press (4, 2020), 10.1201/9781315142005

work page doi:10.1201/9781315142005 2020
[22]

De Fazio, T

F. De Fazio, T. Feldmann and T. Hurth,Light-cone sum rules in soft-collinear effective theory,Nucl. Phys. B733(2006) 1 [hep-ph/0504088]

work page arXiv 2006
[23]

Khodjamirian, T

A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel and N. Offen,B-meson distribution amplitude from theB→π form-factor,Phys. Lett. B620(2005) 52 [hep-ph/0504091]

work page arXiv 2005
[24]

Khodjamirian, T

A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel and N. Offen,Form-factors from light-cone sum rules with B-meson distribution amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 054013 [hep-ph/0611193]

work page arXiv 2007
[25]

De Fazio, T

F. De Fazio, T. Feldmann and T. Hurth,SCET sum rules forB→PandB→Vtransition form factors,JHEP02(2008) 031 [0711.3999]

work page arXiv 2008
[26]

Khodjamirian, B

A. Khodjamirian, B. Meli´ c and Y.-M. Wang,A guide to the QCD light-cone sum rules for b-quark decays,Eur. Phys. J. ST233(2024) 271 [2311.08700]

work page arXiv 2024
[27]

Gubernari, A

N. Gubernari, A. Khodjamirian, R. Mandal and T. Mannel,B→D 1(2420)and B→D ′ 1(2430)form factors from QCD light-cone sum rules,JHEP05(2022) 029 [2203.08493]

work page arXiv 2022
[28]

Gubernari, A

N. Gubernari, A. Khodjamirian, R. Mandal and T. Mannel,B→D ∗ 0 andB s →D ∗ s0 form factors from QCD light-cone sum rules,JHEP12(2023) 015 [2309.10165]

work page arXiv 2023
[29]

Aliev and M.A

T.M. Aliev and M.A. Shifman,Old Tensor Mesons in QCD Sum Rules,Phys. Lett. B112 (1982) 401

1982
[30]

Shifman, A.I

M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov,QCD and Resonance Physics. Theoretical Foundations,Nucl. Phys. B147(1979) 385

1979
[31]

Peskin and D.V

M.E. Peskin and D.V. Schroeder,An Introduction to quantum field theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA (1995), 10.1201/9780429503559

work page doi:10.1201/9780429503559 1995
[32]

De Fazio and M

F. De Fazio and M. Neubert,B→X uℓ¯νℓ decay distributions to orderα s,JHEP06(1999) 017 [hep-ph/9905351]

work page arXiv 1999
[33]

Moreno,NLO QCD corrections to inclusive semitauonic weak decays of heavy hadrons up to1/m 3 b,Phys

D. Moreno,NLO QCD corrections to inclusive semitauonic weak decays of heavy hadrons up to1/m 3 b,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 114008 [2207.14245]. [35]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

work page arXiv 2022
[34]

Colangelo, G

P. Colangelo, G. Nardulli and N. Paver,Semileptonic B decays into charmed p wave mesons and the heavy quark symmetry,Phys. Lett. B293(1992) 207

1992
[35]

Sundu and K

H. Sundu and K. Azizi,Mass and meson-current coupling constant of the tensorD ∗ 2(2460), Eur. Phys. J. A48(2012) 81 [1111.4683]

work page arXiv 2012
[36]

Wang and Z.-Y

Z.-G. Wang and Z.-Y. Di,Masses and decay constants of the heavy tensor mesons with QCD sum rules,Eur. Phys. J. A50(2014) 143 [1405.5092]

work page arXiv 2014
[37]

Gubernari, A

N. Gubernari, A. Kokulu and D. van Dyk,B→PandB→VForm Factors fromB-Meson Light-Cone Sum Rules beyond Leading Twist,JHEP01(2019) 150 [1811.00983]. [40]LHCbcollaboration,Precision measurement ofCPviolation inB 0 s →J/ψK +K − decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 041801 [1411.3104]. – 40 – [41]LHCbcollaboration,Evidence forB→D ∗∗0τ ντ Decays,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(...

work page arXiv 2019
[38]

Dai and M.-q

Y.-b. Dai and M.-q. Huang,Semileptonic B decays into excited charmed mesons from QCD sum rules,Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 034018 [hep-ph/9807461]

work page arXiv 1999
[39]

Huang and Y.-b

M.-q. Huang and Y.-b. Dai,Subleading Isgur-Wise form-factors andO(1/m Q)corrections to the semileptonic decaysB→D 1ℓ¯νℓ andB→D ∗ 2ℓ¯νℓ ,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 014034 [hep-ph/0102299]

work page arXiv 2001
[40]

Zuo, H.-Y

Y.-B. Zuo, H.-Y. Jin, J.-Y. Tian, J. Yi, H.-Y. Gong and T.-T. Pan,B (s) →D ∗∗ (s) form factors in HQEFT and model independent analysis of relevant semileptonic decays with NP effects, Chin. Phys. C47(2023) 103104 [2307.08271]

work page arXiv 2023
[41]

Morenas, A

V. Morenas, A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene and J.C. Raynal,Quantitative predictions for B semileptonic decays intoD, D ∗ and the orbitally excitedD ∗∗ in quark models a la Bakamjian-Thomas,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 5668 [hep-ph/9706265]

work page arXiv 1997
[42]

Le Yaouanc, J.-P

A. Le Yaouanc, J.-P. Leroy and P. Roudeau,Model for nonleptonic and semileptonic decays by B 0 →D∗∗ transitions withBR(j= 1/2)≪BR(j= 3/2)using the Leibovich-Ligeti-Stewart-Wise scheme,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 013004 [2102.11608]

work page arXiv 2022
[43]

Bernlochner and Z

F.U. Bernlochner and Z. Ligeti,SemileptonicB (s) decays to excited charmed mesons with e, µ, τand searching for new physics withR(D ∗∗),Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 014022 [1606.09300]

work page arXiv 2017
[44]

Azizi, H

K. Azizi, H. Sundu and S. Sahin,Investigation of the semileptonic transition of the B into the orbitally excited charmed tensor meson,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 036004 [1306.4098]

work page arXiv 2013
[45]

Aliev, H

T.M. Aliev, H. Dag, A. Kokulu and A. Ozpineci,B→Ttransition form factors in light-cone sum rules,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 094005 [1908.00847]

work page arXiv 2019
[46]

Wang,Analysis of theB→K ∗ 2(1430), a2(1320), f2(1270)form-factors with light-cone QCD sum rules,Mod

Z.-G. Wang,Analysis of theB→K ∗ 2(1430), a2(1320), f2(1270)form-factors with light-cone QCD sum rules,Mod. Phys. Lett. A26(2011) 2761 [1011.3200]

work page arXiv 2011
[47]

Braun, Y

V.M. Braun, Y. Ji and A.N. Manashov,Higher-twist B-meson Distribution Amplitudes in HQET,JHEP05(2017) 022 [1703.02446]

work page arXiv 2017
[48]

L¨ u, Y.-L

C.-D. L¨ u, Y.-L. Shen, Y.-M. Wang and Y.-B. Wei,QCD calculations ofB→π, Kform factors with higher-twist corrections,JHEP01(2019) 024 [1810.00819]

work page arXiv 2019
[49]

Braun, D.Y

V.M. Braun, D.Y. Ivanov and G.P. Korchemsky,The B meson distribution amplitude in QCD,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 034014 [hep-ph/0309330]

work page arXiv 2004
[50]

Nishikawa and K

T. Nishikawa and K. Tanaka,QCD Sum Rules for Quark-Gluon Three-Body Components in the B Meson,Nucl. Phys. B879(2014) 110 [1109.6786]

work page arXiv 2014
[51]

Mandal, P.S

R. Mandal, P.S. Patil and I. Ray,Probing the inverse moment of B s-meson distribution amplitude via B s→η s form factors,JHEP06(2024) 212 [2402.16737]. – 41 –

work page arXiv 2024