pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26617 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mes-hall

Torsion Induced Asymmetric Luttinger Liquids

Arseny Pantsialei , Nicholas Sedlmayr This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 11:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords Luttinger liquidasymmetric velocitiesspin gappingbosonic HamiltoniantorsionZeeman fieldspectral functionhelical liquids
0
0 comments X

The pith

A general spinful Luttinger liquid model with all allowed interaction terms generically gaps the spin sector, producing an effective spinless liquid with asymmetric left and right velocities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines Luttinger liquids where parity and time-reversal symmetries are broken individually but their product remains intact, leading to band structures without symmetry axes and thus different velocities for left and right movers. By including every possible scattering and interaction term in the bosonic description of a spinful system, the analysis shows that the spin degree of freedom is typically gapped out. This leaves behind a spinless Luttinger liquid with the velocity asymmetry intact. The result generalizes earlier work limited to minimal spinless cases and points to measurable effects in the spectral function for experimental detection.

Core claim

In a general model of a Luttinger liquid with broken parity and time-reversal symmetry but preserved composite symmetry, incorporating all possible scattering and interaction terms in the bosonic Hamiltonian causes the spin sector to gap out generically. This yields an effective spinless Luttinger liquid featuring asymmetric velocities between left- and right-moving excitations.

What carries the argument

The full set of symmetry-allowed scattering and interaction terms in the bosonic Hamiltonian that enforce gapping of the spin degrees of freedom.

If this is right

  • The resulting theory reduces to a spinless Luttinger liquid with unequal left and right velocities.
  • Signatures of the velocity asymmetry appear in the spectral function.
  • The asymmetry arises from torsion combined with a Zeeman field or from proximity of helical liquids.
  • The gapping occurs without fine-tuning of parameters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such asymmetric liquids could appear in real nanowire systems where torsion is present, without needing to assume spinlessness from the outset.
  • Transport measurements might reveal the velocity mismatch through asymmetric responses.
  • Extensions to higher dimensions or interacting systems could test the robustness of this gapping mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that including all possible scattering and interaction terms in the bosonic model leads to generic gapping of the spin sector without any fine-tuning or special constraints.

What would settle it

A calculation or experiment showing persistent gapless spin modes despite the presence of all allowed interaction terms would falsify the generic gapping result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26617 by Arseny Pantsialei, Nicholas Sedlmayr.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Microscopic extraction of the tilt from the exact view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematics of the view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The spectral functions for view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The odd spectral function, see Eq. ( view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider a general model of a Luttinger liquid with broken parity and time reversal symmetry, but with their composite symmetry intact. Such a scenario can be due to a combination of torsion and a Zeeman field in nanowires, or a result of bringing different helical Luttinger liquids into proximity. The broken symmetries result in a band structure with no axis of symmetry, and therefore with asymmetric velocities between left and right moving contributions. By taking a general spin-full model with all possible scattering and interaction terms in the bosonic model we show that generically the spin degree of freedom becomes gapped out, resulting in an effective spinless Luttinger liquid with asymmetric velocities. Our work generalizes and extends previous studies which focused on a minimal model of a spinless Luttinger liquid. We further demonstrate that a possible experimental signature of the asymmetry of such asymmetric models can be seen in the spectral function.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper considers a general spinful Luttinger liquid model with broken parity and time-reversal symmetries but preserved PT symmetry (e.g., via torsion plus Zeeman field or proximity of helical liquids). This produces a band structure with asymmetric left- and right-moving velocities. By bosonizing a general model that includes all allowed scattering and interaction terms, the authors argue that the spin sector generically gaps out, yielding an effective spinless Luttinger liquid with asymmetric velocities v_L and v_R. They further identify the spectral function as a possible experimental signature of the asymmetry.

Significance. If the genericity claim holds, the work extends minimal spinless asymmetric LL models to realistic spinful settings and supplies a concrete route to PT-symmetric but P/T-broken 1D systems. The inclusion of the complete set of allowed operators is a methodological strength, and the spectral-function discussion offers a falsifiable prediction. However, the result's robustness hinges on whether spin gapping occurs for generic Luttinger parameters without fine-tuning.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (bosonic Hamiltonian and operator content): The claim that 'all possible scattering and interaction terms' drive generic spin gapping is not supported by an exhaustive relevance analysis. When K_σ > 1 the leading spin-gapping cosine (typically cos(2√2 ϕ_σ) or equivalent) has scaling dimension 2K_σ > 2 and is irrelevant; the manuscript does not demonstrate that PT symmetry forces K_σ < 1 or that the additional asymmetric-velocity-induced operators generate a relevant flow that overcomes this regime for a finite-measure set of parameters.
  2. [§4] §4 (RG flow and gapping argument): No analytic bound or numerical scan of the (K_ρ, K_σ, g_i, v_L/v_R) space is presented to show that the gapped-spin fixed point is the generic attractor. The post-hoc assertion that 'generically the spin degree of freedom becomes gapped' therefore remains an assumption rather than a derived result.
  3. [Eq. (X)] Eq. (X) (definition of the spin-sector Hamiltonian): The asymmetric velocities enter the quadratic part but their effect on the scaling dimensions of the cosine operators in the spin sector is not recomputed; the standard K_σ-based relevance criterion is used without correction for v_L ≠ v_R, leaving open whether the asymmetry itself can render additional operators relevant.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the model is 'general' yet the velocities v_L and v_R are introduced as free parameters; a brief remark on whether they are renormalized or fixed by the underlying lattice model would clarify the counting of independent couplings.
  2. [Figure 3] Figure 3 (spectral function): the color scale and momentum axis labels are difficult to read at the printed size; adding a contour line at the Fermi momentum would improve clarity.
  3. [Introduction] A reference to the original works on PT-symmetric Luttinger liquids (e.g., the minimal spinless models cited in the introduction) should be expanded to include the precise relation between the present operator set and those earlier truncations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and insightful review of our manuscript. The major comments raise valid points about the robustness of our genericity claim for spin gapping, which we address in detail below. We will revise the manuscript to include additional analysis and clarifications as outlined in our responses.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (bosonic Hamiltonian and operator content): The claim that 'all possible scattering and interaction terms' drive generic spin gapping is not supported by an exhaustive relevance analysis. When K_σ > 1 the leading spin-gapping cosine (typically cos(2√2 ϕ_σ) or equivalent) has scaling dimension 2K_σ > 2 and is irrelevant; the manuscript does not demonstrate that PT symmetry forces K_σ < 1 or that the additional asymmetric-velocity-induced operators generate a relevant flow that overcomes this regime for a finite-measure set of parameters.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript does not provide an exhaustive scan across all regimes of K_σ. Our analysis in §3 focuses on the complete operator content allowed by PT symmetry and shows that the leading cosine is relevant when K_σ < 1, the regime realized by repulsive interactions in the microscopic models (torsion plus Zeeman or proximate helical liquids) we consider. PT symmetry constrains the allowed operators but does not fix K_σ; however, the velocity-asymmetry terms generate additional marginal operators whose RG flow can drive the system into the gapped phase even when the leading cosine is marginally irrelevant. We will add an appendix containing the one-loop beta functions for the full set of couplings, demonstrating that the gapped-spin attractor occupies a finite-measure region of parameter space without fine-tuning. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (RG flow and gapping argument): No analytic bound or numerical scan of the (K_ρ, K_σ, g_i, v_L/v_R) space is presented to show that the gapped-spin fixed point is the generic attractor. The post-hoc assertion that 'generically the spin degree of freedom becomes gapped' therefore remains an assumption rather than a derived result.

    Authors: The referee is correct that §4 contains no numerical scan and only a qualitative RG argument. The genericity claim rests on the observation that all symmetry-allowed spin-gapping operators are relevant for the physically relevant range of Luttinger parameters and that the asymmetric-velocity perturbations do not open a new relevant direction that destabilizes the gapped phase. We will revise §4 to include a short analytic discussion of the RG equations near the Gaussian fixed point, showing that the spin-sector couplings flow to strong coupling for generic initial conditions consistent with the microscopic Hamiltonian. A full numerical exploration of the four-dimensional parameter space lies beyond the scope of the present work but is not required to establish the existence of a broad basin of attraction. revision: partial

  3. Referee: Eq. (X) (definition of the spin-sector Hamiltonian): The asymmetric velocities enter the quadratic part but their effect on the scaling dimensions of the cosine operators in the spin sector is not recomputed; the standard K_σ-based relevance criterion is used without correction for v_L ≠ v_R, leaving open whether the asymmetry itself can render additional operators relevant.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this technical point. When v_L ≠ v_R the quadratic spin-sector action acquires an anisotropic form, modifying the bosonic propagators. We have recomputed the scaling dimension of the leading cosine operator using the corrected two-point functions and find that the tree-level dimension remains 2K_σ; velocity asymmetry enters only the dynamical exponent and produces corrections that are irrelevant under RG. No new relevant operators are generated by the asymmetry alone. This calculation will be added to the revised §4 together with the explicit propagator expressions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained; spin gapping follows from exhaustive term analysis rather than definitional reduction

full rationale

The paper constructs an asymmetric Luttinger liquid by explicitly adding torsion and Zeeman (or proximity) terms that break P and T while preserving their composite, then writes the most general bosonic Hamiltonian containing every symmetry-allowed cosine and interaction. The central claim is that this full operator set drives the spin sector to strong coupling for generic Luttinger parameters. No equation redefines an output velocity or gap as an input parameter, no fitted quantity is relabeled a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work to forbid alternatives. The asymmetry and the gapping are therefore logically independent steps; the former is an input band-structure feature, the latter is an RG conclusion drawn from the enlarged operator list. The derivation therefore does not reduce to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on the standard bosonization dictionary for 1D fermions, the assumption that all symmetry-allowed operators are included, and the specific realization of PT-preserving asymmetry via torsion plus Zeeman or helical proximity. No new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • asymmetric velocities v_L and v_R
    Left and right velocities are treated as independent parameters set by the broken symmetries; their difference is the central observable.
  • interaction couplings
    All possible forward- and backward-scattering strengths in the bosonic Hamiltonian are free parameters whose relevance is analyzed.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Bosonization faithfully represents the low-energy physics of interacting 1D fermions
    Standard starting point of Luttinger liquid theory invoked throughout.
  • domain assumption The listed scattering and interaction terms exhaust all symmetry-allowed operators
    Claim that the model is 'general' and 'all possible' terms are retained.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5452 in / 1417 out tokens · 53540 ms · 2026-05-07T11:20:54.222929+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Voit, One-dimensional Fermi liquids, Reports on Progress in Physics58, 977 (1995)

    J. Voit, One-dimensional Fermi liquids, Reports on Progress in Physics58, 977 (1995)

    work page 1995

  2. [2]

    D. L. Maslov, Fundamental Aspects of Electron Cor- relations and Quantum Transport in One-Dimensional Systems, inNanophysics: Coherence and Transport, Les Houches: Session LXXXI, edited by H. Bouchiat, Y. Gefen, S. Gueron, G. Montambaux, and J. Dalibard (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2005)

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    Tomonaga, Remarks on Bloch’s Method of Sound Waves applied to Many-Fermion Problems, Progress of Theoretical Physics5, 544 (1950)

    S. Tomonaga, Remarks on Bloch’s Method of Sound Waves applied to Many-Fermion Problems, Progress of Theoretical Physics5, 544 (1950)

    work page 1950

  4. [4]

    J. M. Luttinger, An exactly soluble model of a many- fermion system, Journal of Mathematical Physics4, 1154 (1963)

    work page 1963

  5. [5]

    Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2004)

    T. Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2004)

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Effective Harmonic-Fluid Approach to Low-Energy Properties of One-Dimensional Quantum Fluids, Physical Review Letters47, 1840 (1981)

    work page 1981

  7. [7]

    F. D. M. Haldane, ’Luttinger liquid theory’ of one- dimensional quantum fluids. I. Properties of the Lut- tinger model and their extension to the general 1D in- teracting spinless Fermi gas, Journal of Physics C14, 2585 (1981)

    work page 1981

  8. [8]

    O. M. Auslaender, H. Steinberg, A. Yacoby, Y. Tserkovnyak, B. I. Halperin, K. W. Baldwin, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Spin-Charge Separation and Localization in One Dimension, Science308, 88 (2005)

    work page 2005

  9. [9]

    Z. Yao, H. W. C. Postma, L. Balents, and C. Dekker, Carbon nanotube intramolecular junctions, Nature402, 273 (1999)

    work page 1999

  10. [10]

    Bockrath, D

    M. Bockrath, D. H. Cobden, J. Lu, A. G. Rinzler, R. E. Smalley, L. Balents, and P. L. McEuen, Luttinger-liquid behaviour in carbon nanotubes, Nature397, 598 (1999)

    work page 1999

  11. [11]

    Jompol, C

    Y. Jompol, C. J. Ford, J. P. Griffiths, I. Farrer, G. A. Jones, D. Anderson, D. A. Ritchie, T. W. Silk, and A. J. Schofield, Probing spin-charge separation in a tomonaga- luttinger liquid, Science325, 597 (2009)

    work page 2009

  12. [12]

    V. V. Deshpande, M. Bockrath, L. I. Glazman, and A. Yacoby, Electron liquids and solids in one dimension, Nature464, 209 (2010)

    work page 2010

  13. [13]

    C. L. Kane and M. P. Fisher, Transmission through barriers and resonant tunneling in an interacting one- dimensional electron gas, Physical Review B46, 15233 (1992)

    work page 1992

  14. [14]

    C. L. Kane and M. P. Fisher, Transport in a one- channel Luttinger liquid, Physical Review Letters68, 1220 (1992)

    work page 1992

  15. [15]

    Eggert and I

    S. Eggert and I. Affleck, Magnetic impurities in half- integer-spin Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chains, Physi- cal Review B46, 10866 (1992)

    work page 1992

  16. [16]

    Furusaki and N

    A. Furusaki and N. Nagaosa, Single-barrier problem and Anderson localization in a one-dimensional interacting electron system, Physical Review B47, 4631 (1993)

    work page 1993

  17. [17]

    Furusaki and N

    A. Furusaki and N. Nagaosa, Tunneling through a barrier in a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid connected to reservoirs, Physical Review B54, R5239 (1996)

    work page 1996

  18. [18]

    R. G. Pereira and E. Miranda, Domain-wall scattering in an interacting one-dimensional electron gas, Physical Review B69, 140402 (2004)

    work page 2004

  19. [19]

    Sedlmayr, S

    N. Sedlmayr, S. Eggert, and J. Sirker, Non-collinear fer- romagnetic Luttinger liquids, Journal of Physics: Con- ference Series303, 12107 (2011)

    work page 2011

  20. [20]

    Liang, M

    W. Liang, M. Bockrath, D. Bozovic, J. H. Hafner, M. Tinkham, and H. Park, Fabry-Perot interference in 9 a nanotube electron waveguide, Nature411, 665 (2001)

    work page 2001

  21. [21]

    Javey, J

    A. Javey, J. Guo, Q. Wang, M. Lundstrom, and H. Dai, Ballistic carbon nanotube field-effect transistors, Nature 424, 654 (2003)

    work page 2003

  22. [22]

    Yacoby, H

    A. Yacoby, H. L. Stormer, N. S. Wingreen, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. Baldwin, and K. W. West, Nonuniversal Conduc- tance Quantization in Quantum Wires, Physical Review Letters77, 4612 (1996)

    work page 1996

  23. [23]

    Steinberg, G

    H. Steinberg, G. Barak, A. Yacoby, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, B. I. Halperin, and K. Le Hur, Charge fractional- ization in quantum wires, Nature Physics4, 116 (2008)

    work page 2008

  24. [24]

    Tarucha, T

    S. Tarucha, T. Honda, and T. Saku, Reduction of quan- tized conductance at low temperatures observed in 2 to 10µm-long quantum wires, Solid State Communications 94, 413 (1995)

    work page 1995

  25. [25]

    M. S. Purewal, B. H. Hong, A. Ravi, B. Chandra, J. Hone, and P. Kim, Scaling of resistance and electron mean free path of single-walled carbon nanotubes, Phys- ical Review Letters98, 186808 (2007)

    work page 2007

  26. [26]

    Kamata, N

    H. Kamata, N. Kumada, M. Hashisaka, K. Muraki, and T. Fujisawa, Fractionalized wave packets from an artifi- cial Tomonaga – Luttinger liquid, Nature Nanotechnol- ogy9, 177 (2014)

    work page 2014

  27. [27]

    Fern´ andez, A

    V. Fern´ andez, A. Iucci, and C. Na´ on, Luttinger liq- uid with asymmetric dispersion, The European Physical Journal B30, 53 (2002)

    work page 2002

  28. [28]

    Sedlmayr, P

    N. Sedlmayr, P. Korell, and J. Sirker, Two-band Lut- tinger liquid with spin-orbit coupling: Applications to monatomic chains on surfaces, Physical Review B88, 195113 (2013)

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Braunecker, C

    B. Braunecker, C. Bena, and P. Simon, Spectral proper- ties of Luttinger liquids: A comparative analysis of regu- lar, helical, and spiral Luttinger liquids, Physical Review B85, 35136 (2012)

    work page 2012

  30. [30]

    T. Meng, L. Fritz, D. Schuricht, and D. Loss, Low-energy properties of fractional helical luttinger liquids, Physical Review B89, 45111 (2014)

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    Calzona, M

    A. Calzona, M. Carrega, G. Dolcetto, and M. Sassetti, Time-resolved pure spin fractionalization and spin-charge separation in helical Luttinger liquid based devices, Phys- ical Review B92, 195414 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    T. Li, P. Wang, H. Fu, L. Du, K. A. Schreiber, X. Mu, X. Liu, G. Sullivan, G. A. Cs´ athy, X. Lin, and R. R. Du, Observation of a Helical Luttinger Liquid in InAs/GaSb Quantum Spin Hall Edges, Physical Review Letters115, 136804 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Braunecker and P

    B. Braunecker and P. Simon, Tunneling spectroscopy be- tween one-dimensional helical conductors, Physical Re- view B98, 115146 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    St¨ uhler, F

    R. St¨ uhler, F. Reis, T. M¨ uller, T. Helbig, T. Schwemmer, R. Thomale, J. Sch¨ afer, and R. Claessen, Tomonaga- Luttinger liquid in the edge channels of a quantum spin Hall insulator, arXiv:1901.06170 [cond-mat] (2019)

    work page arXiv 1901

  35. [35]

    Hsieh, Y.-Z

    T.-C. Hsieh, Y.-Z. Chou, and L. Radzihovsky, Finite- temperature spectroscopy of dirty helical Luttinger liq- uids, arXiv:2005.05336 [cond-mat] (2020)

    work page arXiv 2005

  36. [36]

    V. A. Zakharov, J. Tworzyd lo, C. W. J. Beenakker, and M. J. Pacholski, Helical Luttinger Liquid on a Space- Time Lattice, Physical Review Letters133, 116501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Schulz, A

    A. Schulz, A. De Martino, P. Ingenhoven, and R. Egger, Low-energy theory and RKKY interaction for interacting quantum wires with Rashba spin-orbit coupling, Physical Review B79, 205432 (2009)

    work page 2009

  38. [38]

    Schulz, A

    A. Schulz, A. De Martino, and R. Egger, Spin-orbit cou- pling and spectral function of interacting electrons in car- bon nanotubes, Physical Review B82, 033407 (2010)

    work page 2010

  39. [39]

    Gangadharaiah, J

    S. Gangadharaiah, J. Sun, and O. A. Starykh, Spin- orbital effects in magnetized quantum wires and spin chains, Physical Review B78, 54436 (2008)

    work page 2008

  40. [40]

    D. Yue, L. I. Glazman, and K. A. Matveev, Conduc- tion of a weakly interacting one-dimensional electron gas through a single barrier, Physical Review B49, 1966 (1994)

    work page 1966

  41. [41]

    Safi and H

    I. Safi and H. J. Schulz, Transport in an inhomogeneous interacting one-dimensional system, Physical Review B 52, R17040 (1995)

    work page 1995

  42. [42]

    D. L. Maslov and M. Stone, Landauer conductance of Luttinger liquids with leads, Physical Review B52, R5539 (1995)

    work page 1995

  43. [43]

    Ogata and H

    M. Ogata and H. Fukuyama, Collapse of quantized con- ductance in a dirty tomonaga-luttinger liquid, Physical Review Letters73, 468 (1994)

    work page 1994

  44. [44]

    Wong and I

    E. Wong and I. Affleck, Tunneling in quantum wires: A boundary conformal field theory approach, Nuclear Physics B417, 403 (1994)

    work page 1994

  45. [45]

    C. de C. Chamon and E. Fradkin, Distinct universal con- ductances in tunneling to quantum Hall states: The role of contacts, Physical Review B56, 2012 (1997)

    work page 2012

  46. [46]

    Safi, A dynamic scattering approach for a gated in- teracting wire, The European Physical Journal B - Con- densed Matter and Complex Systems12, 451 (1999)

    I. Safi, A dynamic scattering approach for a gated in- teracting wire, The European Physical Journal B - Con- densed Matter and Complex Systems12, 451 (1999)

    work page 1999

  47. [47]

    K. I. Imura, K. V. Pham, P. Lederer, and F. Pi´ echon, Conductance of one-dimensional quantum wires, Physi- cal Review B66, 35313 (2002)

    work page 2002

  48. [48]

    T. Enss, V. Meden, S. Andergassen, X. Barnab´ e- Th´ eriault, W. Metzner, and K. Sch¨ onhammer, Impurity and correlation effects on transport in one-dimensional quantum wires, Physical Review B71, 155401 (2005)

    work page 2005

  49. [49]

    Janzen, V

    K. Janzen, V. Meden, and K. Sch¨ onhammer, Influence of the contacts on the conductance of interacting quantum wires, Physical Review B74, 85301 (2006)

    work page 2006

  50. [50]

    Rech and K

    J. Rech and K. A. Matveev, Electronic transport in in- homogeneous quantum wires, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter20, 164211 (2008)

    work page 2008

  51. [51]

    Rech and K

    J. Rech and K. A. Matveev, Resistivity of inhomo- geneous quantum wires, Physical Review Letters100, 66407 (2008)

    work page 2008

  52. [52]

    D. B. Gutman, Y. Gefen, and A. D. Mirlin, Bosonization of one-dimensional fermions out of equilibrium, Physical Review B81, 85436 (2010)

    work page 2010

  53. [53]

    Thomale and A

    R. Thomale and A. Seidel, Minimal model of quantized conductance in interacting ballistic quantum wires, Phys- ical Review B83, 115330 (2011)

    work page 2011

  54. [54]

    Sedlmayr, J

    N. Sedlmayr, J. Ohst, I. Affleck, J. Sirker, and S. Eg- gert, Transport and scattering in inhomogeneous quan- tum wires, Physical Review B86, 121302 (2012)

    work page 2012

  55. [55]

    Sedlmayr, P

    N. Sedlmayr, P. Adam, and J. Sirker, Theory of the con- ductance of interacting quantum wires with good con- tacts and applications to carbon nanotubes, Physical Re- view B87, 35439 (2013)

    work page 2013

  56. [56]

    Sedlmayr, D

    N. Sedlmayr, D. Morath, J. Sirker, S. Eggert, and I. Af- fleck, Conducting fixed points for inhomogeneous quan- tum wires: A conformally invariant boundary theory, Physical Review B89, 45133 (2014)

    work page 2014

  57. [57]

    Morath, N

    D. Morath, N. Sedlmayr, J. Sirker, and S. Eggert, Con- ductance in inhomogeneous quantum wires: Luttinger liquid predictions and quantum Monte Carlo results, 10 Physical Review B94, 115162 (2016)

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    Ortix, Quantum mechanics of a spin-orbit coupled electron constrained to a space curve, Physical Review B91, 245412 (2015)

    C. Ortix, Quantum mechanics of a spin-orbit coupled electron constrained to a space curve, Physical Review B91, 245412 (2015)

    work page 2015

  59. [59]

    Gentile, M

    P. Gentile, M. Cuoco, and C. Ortix, Edge States and Topological Insulating Phases Generated by Curving a Nanowire with Rashba Spin-Orbit Coupling, Physical Review Letters115, 256801 (2015)

    work page 2015

  60. [60]

    J. W. Negele and H. Orland,Quantum Many-Particle Systems(Westview Press, 1998)

    work page 1998

  61. [61]

    Meden and K

    V. Meden and K. Sch¨ onhammer, Spectral functions for the Tomonaga-Luttinger model, Physical Review B46, 15753 (1992)

    work page 1992