Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Third-order intrinsic anomalous Hall effect as a transport fingerprint of altermagnets

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-07 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The third-order intrinsic anomalous Hall effect serves as a transport fingerprint for altermagnets once spin-orbit coupling is included.

desk verdict The paper shows third-order intrinsic AHE is symmetry-allowed in altermagnets with SOC and resonant via Berry curvature quadrupole in two models, but the symmetry claim needs verification against full SOC-reduced groups. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.26665 v1 submitted 2026-04-29 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Longjun Xiang , Hao Jin , Jian Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetsintrinsicanomalousHalleffectthird-orderresponseBerrycurvaturequadrupolespin-orbitcouplingquantummagnetstransportfingerprintbandcrossings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that altermagnets permit a third-order intrinsic anomalous Hall effect when spin-orbit coupling is present, extending the known hierarchy where ferromagnets show linear responses and certain antiferromagnets show second-order ones. Through spin-group symmetry analysis, this third-order response is shown to be generically allowed in the ten relevant spin Laue groups. Calculations in both a Lieb-lattice model and the material V2Se2O reveal a resonant enhancement near altermagnetic band crossings at generic momenta. The effect originates from the Berry curvature quadrupole encoded in the second-order Berry curvature and activated by finite spin-orbit coupling, positioning the third-order IAHE as a diagnostic for altermagnetic order in transport experiments.

What carries the argument

The Berry curvature quadrupole from the second-order Berry curvature under spin-orbit coupling, which supplies the anomalous velocity for the third-order response in symmetry-allowed altermagnetic systems.

What would settle it

Transport measurements on V2Se2O showing no resonant peak in the third-order Hall conductivity near the predicted altermagnetic band crossings would falsify the resonance mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Based on spin-group symmetry analysis, the third-order IAHE is generically allowed in the ten spin Laue groups relevant to altermagnets when spin-orbit coupling is taken into account. By combining these symmetry constraints with the anomalous velocity induced by the second-order Berry curvature, a resonant third-order IAHE arises near the altermagnetic band crossings at generic momenta in both the Lieb-lattice altermagnet and the experimentally realized altermagnet V2Se2O. The Berry curvature quadrupole, encoded in the second-order Berry curvature and activated by finite SOC, is identified as the microscopic quantum geometric origin of this resonance. This establishes the third-order IAHE as

Load-bearing premise

That the second-order Berry curvature produces an anomalous velocity which, when combined with the symmetry-allowed third-order response, yields a measurable resonant effect at generic momenta once spin-orbit coupling is included.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The third-order IAHE distinguishes altermagnets from ferromagnets and PT-symmetric antiferromagnets in transport measurements.
  • Resonant signals appear near altermagnetic band crossings at generic momenta.
  • The effect occurs in both model systems such as the Lieb lattice and real materials such as V2Se2O.
  • It completes the hierarchy of intrinsic anomalous Hall effects across collinear quantum magnets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This response could enable purely electrical detection of altermagnetic order in devices without applied magnetic fields.
  • Higher-order nonlinear Hall effects may appear in other classes of symmetry-broken magnets once similar symmetry and geometric analyses are applied.
  • Strain or doping could shift the band crossings to tune the resonance frequency or strength for practical sensors.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that spin-group symmetry analysis shows the third-order intrinsic anomalous Hall effect (IAHE) is generically allowed in the ten spin Laue groups relevant to altermagnets once spin-orbit coupling (SOC) is included. Combining this permission with the anomalous velocity from second-order Berry curvature, the authors identify a resonant third-order IAHE near altermagnetic band crossings at generic momenta in both a Lieb-lattice model and the material V2Se2O, with the Berry curvature quadrupole as the quantum-geometric origin. This positions the third-order IAHE as an intrinsic transport fingerprint distinguishing altermagnets within the hierarchy of collinear quantum magnets.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a new intrinsic, quantum-geometric diagnostic for altermagnetic order that complements existing linear and second-order IAHE distinctions for ferromagnets and PT-symmetric antiferromagnets. The explicit linkage of symmetry-allowed tensor components to a resonant response driven by the Berry curvature quadrupole, together with concrete calculations on both a lattice model and an experimentally realized compound, provides a falsifiable prediction that could guide nonlinear transport experiments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Symmetry analysis] § on spin-group symmetry analysis (near the statement that third-order IAHE is 'generically allowed in the ten spin Laue groups when SOC is taken into account'): the claim that the relevant components of the third-order conductivity tensor remain symmetry-allowed once SOC is included is load-bearing for the entire argument. SOC explicitly entangles spin and orbital degrees of freedom and reduces the symmetry from spin groups to the appropriate magnetic point or space group. The manuscript must demonstrate, either by explicit enumeration of allowed tensor components under the SOC-reduced group or by a side-by-side comparison, that the third-order IAHE terms survive this reduction; otherwise the 'generically allowed' statement and the subsequent resonance construction do not follow.
  2. [Model calculations] Model calculations section (Lieb lattice and V2Se2O results): the reported resonance is attributed to the combination of symmetry-allowed third-order terms with the anomalous velocity from second-order Berry curvature. The manuscript should explicitly show which tensor components are activated, their scaling with SOC strength, and confirmation that the resonance vanishes when the symmetry-allowed channels are artificially suppressed. Without this decomposition the link between the symmetry analysis and the numerical resonance remains indirect.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief, explicit list or table of the ten spin Laue groups under consideration.
  2. [Notation] Notation for the third-order response tensor (e.g., σ_ijk or its nonlinear generalization) should be defined once and used consistently; currently the transition between linear, second-order, and third-order conductivities can be confusing on first reading.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments, which help clarify key aspects of our symmetry analysis and numerical results. We address each major comment point by point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Symmetry analysis] § on spin-group symmetry analysis (near the statement that third-order IAHE is 'generically allowed in the ten spin Laue groups when SOC is taken into account'): the claim that the relevant components of the third-order conductivity tensor remain symmetry-allowed once SOC is included is load-bearing for the entire argument. SOC explicitly entangles spin and orbital degrees of freedom and reduces the symmetry from spin groups to the appropriate magnetic point or space group. The manuscript must demonstrate, either by explicit enumeration of allowed tensor components under the SOC-reduced group or by a side-by-side comparison, that the third-order IAHE terms survive this reduction; otherwise the 'generically allowed' statement and the subsequent resonance construction do not follow.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration is required to confirm the third-order IAHE tensor components survive the symmetry reduction from spin groups to magnetic point groups upon including SOC. In the revised manuscript we will add a side-by-side comparison of the allowed components under the ten spin Laue groups (without SOC) versus the corresponding magnetic point groups (with SOC). This enumeration will show that the relevant third-order conductivity tensor elements enabling the IAHE remain symmetry-allowed for altermagnets, thereby supporting the generic allowance statement and the subsequent resonance analysis. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model calculations] Model calculations section (Lieb lattice and V2Se2O results): the reported resonance is attributed to the combination of symmetry-allowed third-order terms with the anomalous velocity from second-order Berry curvature. The manuscript should explicitly show which tensor components are activated, their scaling with SOC strength, and confirmation that the resonance vanishes when the symmetry-allowed channels are artificially suppressed. Without this decomposition the link between the symmetry analysis and the numerical resonance remains indirect.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the numerical results would benefit from a more explicit decomposition linking the symmetry-allowed terms to the observed resonance. In the revised version we will identify the specific activated tensor components in both the Lieb-lattice model and V2Se2O calculations. We will also report the scaling of the third-order IAHE with SOC strength and include supplementary calculations in which the symmetry-allowed channels are suppressed (by zeroing relevant Berry curvature quadrupole contributions or modifying the Hamiltonian to eliminate the permitted terms while retaining other symmetries). These additions will directly confirm that the resonance originates from the symmetry-allowed third-order IAHE and strengthen the connection to the symmetry analysis. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; symmetry analysis and quantum geometry are independent of fitted inputs

full rationale

The derivation begins with spin-group symmetry analysis applied to the ten Laue groups for altermagnets, determining allowed third-order IAHE tensor components once SOC is included. These constraints are then combined with the standard anomalous velocity from second-order Berry curvature to identify a resonance near generic-momentum band crossings. Model calculations on the Lieb lattice and V2Se2O serve as explicit realizations rather than tautological fits. No equation reduces a claimed prediction to a parameter fitted from the target data, no load-bearing step collapses to a self-citation chain, and the central result does not rename a known empirical pattern. The chain remains self-contained against external group-theoretic and quantum-geometric benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on spin-group symmetry classification of altermagnets and the standard definition of Berry curvature and its derivatives; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Spin-group symmetry analysis determines allowed higher-order Hall responses in altermagnets
    Invoked to show generic allowance in ten spin Laue groups.
  • domain assumption Anomalous velocity is induced by the second-order Berry curvature
    Used to combine with symmetry constraints for the third-order response.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Third-order intrinsic anomalous Hall effect as a transport fingerprint of altermagnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.26665

@misc{pith2026260426665,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Third-order intrinsic anomalous Hall effect as a transport fingerprint of altermagnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.26665}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.26665}
}
abstract

The intrinsic anomalous Hall effect (IAHE) provides a powerful transport fingerprint of quantum magnets, with its linear and second-order responses distinguishing ferromagnets and $\mathcal{P}\mathcal{T}$-symmetric antiferromagnets, respectively. Altermagnets, as an emergent class of quantum magnets, have recently been shown to host a third-order extrinsic anomalous Hall effect, raising a question of whether an \textit{intrinsic} counterpart can serve as a diagnostic of altermagnetic order. Based on spin-group symmetry analysis, we demonstrate that the third-order IAHE is generically allowed in the ten spin Laue groups relevant to altermagnets when spin-orbit coupling (SOC) is taken into account. By combining these symmetry constraints with the anomalous velocity induced by the second-order Berry curvature, we uncover a resonant third-order IAHE arising near the altermagnetic band crossings at generic momenta in both the Lieb-lattice altermagnet and the experimentally realized altermagnet V$_2$Se$_2$O. Notably, we identify the Berry curvature quadrupole, encoded in the second-order Berry curvature and activated by finite SOC, as the microscopic quantum geometric origin of this resonance. Our results establish the third-order IAHE as an intrinsic quantum geometric transport fingerprint of altermagnets and extend the hierarchy of IAHE across collinear quantum magnets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26665 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The hierarchy of IAHE across collinear quantum magnets. view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Third-order IAHE in 2D Lieb-lattice altermagnet. (a) The view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Third-order IAHE in 2D Lieb-lattice altermagnets with a view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dissipationless Photovoltaic Spin Hall Effect from Spin-current Vorticity

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Spin-current vorticity is shown to drive a dissipationless photovoltaic spin Hall effect: circular light couples it to Berry curvature, linear light to quantum metric, yielding switchable time-reversal-even and odd sp...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. S mejkal, R. Gonz\'alez-Hern\'andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz8809

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz8809 2020

  2. [2]

    Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry

    L. S mejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.031042

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.031042 2022

  3. [3]

    Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism

    L. S mejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.040501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.040501 2022

  4. [4]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. S mejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring New Frontiers in Magnetism and Spintronics, Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2409327 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202409327

    work page doi:10.1002/adfm.202409327 2024

  5. [5]

    C. Wu, K. Sun, E. Fradkin, and S. C. Zhang, Fermi liquid instabilities in the spin channel, Phys. Rev. B 75, 115103 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.115103

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.115103 2007

  6. [6]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum-Dependent Spin Splitting by Collinear Antiferromagnetic Ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 123702 (2019) https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.88.123702

    work page doi:10.7566/jpsj.88.123702 2019

  7. [7]

    L. Yuan, Z. Wang, J. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low- Z antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.014422

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.014422 2020

  8. [8]

    H. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat. Commun. 12, 2846 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23127-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23127-7 2021

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    Mazin, Editorial: Altermagnetism—A New Punch Line of Fundamental Magnetism, Phys

    I. Mazin, Editorial: Altermagnetism—A New Punch Line of Fundamental Magnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040002 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.040002

    2022 doi

  2. [10]

    C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nat. Rev. Mater. 10, 473 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-025-00779-1

    2025 doi

  3. [11]

    H. Lin, S. Zhang, H. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Coulomb Drag in Altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 136301 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.136301

    2025 doi

  4. [12]

    Jiang, U

    X. Jiang, U. Jeong, S. Sato, D. Shin, K. Yabana, B. Yan, and N. Park, Nonlinear Photocurrent as a Hallmark of Altermagnet, ACS Nano 19, 23620 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5c01421

    2025 doi

  5. [13]

    Das and B

    K. Das and B. Yan, Linear Magnetoresistance as a Probe of the N\'eel Vector in Altermagnets with Vanishing Anomalous Hall Effect, Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.12692 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.12692

    doi

  6. [14]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1539

    2010 doi

  7. [15]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1959

    1959 doi

  8. [16]

    Y. Gao, S. Y. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Field Induced Positional Shift of Bloch Electrons and Its Dynamical Implications, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.166601 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 166601 (2014)

    2014 doi

  9. [17]

    C. Wang, Y. Gao, and D. Xiao, Intrinsic nonlinear Hall effect in antiferromagnetic tetragonal CuMnAs, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.277201 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 277201 (2021)

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    H. Liu, J. Zhao, Y.-X. Huang, W. Wu, X.-L. Sheng, C. Xiao, and S. Y. A. Yang, Intrinsic second-order anomalous Hall effect and its application in compensated antiferromagnets, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.277202 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 277202 (2021)

    2021 doi

  11. [19]

    Gao, Y.-F

    A. Gao, Y.-F. Liu, J.-X. Qiu, B. Ghosh, T. V. Trevisan, Y. Onishi, C. Hu, T. Qian, H.-J. Tien, S.-W. Chen, et al., Quantum metric nonlinear Hall effect in a topological antiferromagnetic heterostructure, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adf1506 Science 381, 181 (2023)

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    N. Wang, D. Kaplan, Z. Zhang, T. Holder, N. Cao, A. Wang, X. Zhou, F. Zhou, Z. Jiang, C. Zhang et al., Quantum-metric-induced nonlinear transport in a topological antiferromagnet, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06363-3 Nature (London) 621, 487 (2023)

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    J. Han, T. Uchimura, Y. Araki, J.-Y. Yoon, Y. Takeuchi, Y. Yamane, S. Kanai, J. Ieda, H. Ohno, and S. Fukami, Room-temperature flexible manipulation of the quantum-metric structure in a topological chiral antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys. 20, 1110 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41...

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    Zhang, X.-J

    C.-P. Zhang, X.-J. Gao, Y.-M. Xie, H. C. Po, and K. T. Law, Higher-order nonlinear anomalous Hall effects induced by Berry curvature multipoles, Phys. Rev. B 107, 115142 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.115142

    2023 doi

  15. [23]

    S. Lai, H. Liu, Z. Zhang, J. Zhao, X. Feng, N. Wang, C. Tang, Y. Liu, K. S. Novoselov, S. A. Yang, and W.-B Gao, Third-order nonlinear Hall effect induced by the Berry-connection polarizability tensor, Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 869 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-00917-0

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    R. Chu, L. Han, Z. Gong, X. Fu, H. Bai, S. Liang, C. Chen, S-W. Cheong, Y. Zhang, J. Liu, Y. Wang, F. Pan, H. Lu, and C. Song, Third-Order Nonlinear Hall Effect in Altermagnet RuO _2 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 216703 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/rv1n-vr4p

    2025 doi

  17. [25]

    Xiang, C

    L. Xiang, C. Zhang, L. Wang, and J. Wang, Third-order intrinsic anomalous Hall effect with generalized semiclassical theory, Phys. Rev. B 107, 075411 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.075411

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    Mandal, S

    D. Mandal, S. Sarkar, K. Das, and A. Agarwal, Quantum geometry induced third-order nonlinear transport responses, Phys. Rev. B 110, 195131 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.195131

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    A. K. Dagnino, X. Liu, and T. Neupert, Non-linear transport in multifold semimetals, Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.08891 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.08891

    doi

  20. [28]

    Y. Fang, J. Cano, and S. A. A. Ghorashi, Quantum geometry induced nonlinear transport in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 106701 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.106701

    2024 doi

  21. [29]

    H. Chen, P. Qin, Z. Meng, G. Zhao, K. Chen, C. Xi, X. Wang, L. Liu, Z. Duan, S. Jiang, J. Li, X. Tan, J. Liu, J. Wang, H. Liu, C. Jiang, and Z. Liu, Giant room-temperature third-order electrical transport in a thin-film altermagnet candidate, Nat. Nanotechnol. XXX, XXXX (2026)...

    2026 doi

  22. [30]

    Z. Liu, M. Wei, W. Peng, D. Hou, Y. Gao, and Q. Niu, Multipolar Anisotropy in Anomalous Hall Effect from Spin-Group Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. X 15, 031006 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.15.031006

    2025 doi

  23. [31]

    X. Feng, L. K. Ang, S. A. Yang, C. Xiao, and X. C. Xie, Giant Out-of-Plane Magnetic Orbital Torque of Altermagnets from Spin-Group Symmetry Breaking, Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.19076 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.19076

    doi

  24. [32]

    Brekke, A

    B. Brekke, A. Brataas, and A. Sudb , Two-dimensional altermagnets: Superconductivity in a minimal microscopic model, Phys. Rev. B 108, 224421 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.224421

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    D. S. Antonenko, R. M. Fernandes, and J. W. F. Venderbos, Mirror Chern Bands and Weyl Nodal Loops in Altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 096703 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.096703

    2025 doi

  26. [34]

    Cheng, Y

    X. Cheng, Y. Gao, J. Peng, and J. Liu, Realistic tight-binding model for V2Se2O-family altermagnets, Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.09465 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.09465

    doi

  27. [35]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y. Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu, M. Ye, Y. Huang, X. Meng, C. Zhang, T. Okuda, K. Shimada, S. Cui, Y. Zhao, G.-H. Cao, S. Qiao, J. Liu, and C. Chen, Crystal-symmetry-paired spin–valley locking in a layered room-temperature...

    2025 doi

  28. [36]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, Y.-J. Sun, Y. Huang, X. Zheng, Y. Peng, L. He, S. Li, J. Luo, Z. Li, G. Chen, H. Li, H. Weng, and T. Qian, A metallic room-temperature d-wave altermagnet, Nat. Phys. 21, 754 (2025) https://doi.org/10...

    2025 doi

  29. [37]

    Q. Hu, X. Cheng, Q. Duan, Y. Hu, B. Jiang, Y. Xiao, Y. Li, M. Pan, L. Deng, C. Liu, G. Cao, Z. Liu, M. Ye, S. Qiao, Z. Liu, Z. Sun, A. Gao, Y. Huang, R. Zhong, J. Liu, B. Lv, and H. Ding, Observation of spin--valley locked nodal lines in a quasi-2D altermagnet, Preprint at arX...

    2026 doi

  30. [38]

    D. E. Parker, T. Morimoto, J. Orenstein, and J. E. Moore, Diagrammatic approach to nonlinear optical response with application to Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 99, 045121 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.045121

    2019 doi

  31. [39]

    Sankar, R

    S. Sankar, R. Liu, C.-P. Zhang, Q.-F. Li, C. Chen, X.-J. Gao, J. Zheng, Y.-H. Lin, K. Qian, R.-P. Yu, X. Zhang, Z. Y. Meng, K. T. Law, Q. Shao, and B. J\" a ck, Experimental evidence for a Berry curvature quadrupole in an antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021046 (2024) https:/...

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    Xiang, J

    L. Xiang, J. Jia, F. Xu, and J. Wang, Classification of electromagnetic responses by quantum geometry, Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.02661 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.02661

    doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    J. Jia, L. Xiang, Z. Qiao, and J. Wang, Equivalence of semiclassical and response theories for second-order nonlinear ac Hall effects, Phys. Rev. B 110, 245406 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.245406

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    A. M. Cook, B. M. Fregoso, F. de Juan, S. Coh, and J. E. Moore, Design principles for shift current, Nat. Commun. 8, 14176 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14176

    2017 doi

  35. [43]

    Note that the T -even third-order EAHE, arising from the quantum metric quadrupole BCQ4, QMQ1, QMQ2 , can be distinguished from the intrinsic one in experiments and will not be discussed in this work

  36. [44]

    H. Li, C. Zhang, C. Zhou, C. Ma, X. Lei, Z. Jin, H. He, B. Li, K. T. Law, and J. Wang, Quantum geometry quadrupole-induced third-order nonlinear transport in antiferromagnetic topological insulator MnBi _2 Te _4 , Nat. Commun. 15, 7779 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-02...

    2024 doi

  37. [45]

    X. Liu, A. Wang, D. Li, T. Zhao, X. Liao, and Z. M. Liao, Giant Third-Order Nonlinearity Induced by the Quantum Metric Quadrupole in Few-Layer WTe _2 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 026305 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.026305

    2025 doi

  38. [46]

    In a moderately dirty altermagnetic metal with alter2024, alter2026 10^ -14 s , we find that ^ (0) _ abcd / ^ (2) _ abcd 40 with a light doping 10^ -2 eV

    By dimensional analysis, we find ^ (0) _ abcd / ^ (2) _ abcd ^2/( )^2 , where is the chemical potential controlled by the doping. In a moderately dirty altermagnetic metal with alter2024, alter2026 10^ -14 s , we find that ^ (0) _ abcd / ^ (2) _ abcd 40 with a light doping 10^ -2 eV

  39. [47]

    Mehraeen, Quantum Response Theory and Momentum-Space Gravity, Phys

    M. Mehraeen, Quantum Response Theory and Momentum-Space Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 156302 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/t6nt-qzws

    2025 doi

  40. [48]

    Note that both _ abcd ^ (0) and _ abc are spinless

  41. [49]

    Without the assumption of N j and N E , the spin point group ^26/^2m can support the elements ^ (0) _ yzxx and ^ (0) _ yzxy while the spin point group ^2/^2m^2m^1m can support the elements ^ (0) _ yzxx =- ^ (0) _ zyxy =- ^ (0) _ zxxy in presence of SOC

  42. [50]

    Berlijn, P

    T. Berlijn, P. C. Snijders, O. Delaire, H.-D. Zhou, T. A. Maier, H.-B. Cao, S.-X. Chi, M. Matsuda, and Y. Wang, Itinerant Antiferromagnetism in RuO _2 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 077201 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.077201

    2017 doi

  43. [51]

    Z. H. Zhu, J. Strempfer, R. R. Rao, C. A. Occhialini, J. Pelliciari, Y. Choi, T. Kawaguchi, H. You, J. F. Mitchell, Y. Shao-Horn, and R. Comin, Anomalous Antiferromagnetism in Metallic RuO _2 Determined by Resonant X-ray Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 017202 (2019) https://...

    2019 doi

  44. [52]

    Hiraishi, H

    M. Hiraishi, H. Okabe, A. Koda, R. Kadono, T. Muroi, D. Hirai, and Z. Hiroi, Nonmagnetic Ground State in RuO _2 Revealed by Muon Spin Rotation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 166702 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.166702

    2024 doi

  45. [53]

    Ke ler, L

    P. Ke ler, L. Garcia-Gassull, A. Suter, T. Prokscha, Z. Salman, D. Khalyavin, P. Manuel, F. Orlandi, I. I. Mazin, R. Valent\'i, and S. Moser, Absence of magnetic order in RuO _2 : insights from SR spectroscopy and neutron diffraction, npj Spintronics 2, 50 (2024) https://doi.o...

    2024 doi

  46. [54]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. S mejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty, T. Denneulin, W. Shi, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, S. Das, M. Kläui, J. Sinova, and M. Jourdan, Direct observation of altermagne...

    2024 doi

  47. [55]

    J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Cheng et al., Large Band Splitting in g -Wave Altermagnet CrSb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 206401 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.206401

    2024 doi

  48. [56]

    G. Yang, Z. Li, S. Yang, J. Li, H. Zheng, W. Zhu, Z. Pan, Y. Xu, S. Cao, W. Zhao, A. Jana, J. Zhang, M. Ye, Y. Song, L.-H. Hu, L. Yang, J. Fujii, I. Vobornik, M. Shi, H. Yuan, Y. Zhang, Y. Xu, and Y. Liu, Three-dimensional mapping of the altermagnetic spin splitting in CrSb, N...

    2025 doi

  49. [57]

    Zeng, M.-Y

    M. Zeng, M.-Y. Zhu, Y.-P. Zhu, X.-R. Liu, X.-M. Ma, Y.-J. Hao, P. Liu, G. Qu, Y. Yang, Z. Jiang, K. Yamagami, M. Arita, X. Zhang, T.-H. Shao, Y. Dai, K. Shimada, Z. Liu, M. Ye, Y. Huang, Q. Liu, and C. Liu, Observation of Spin Splitting in Room-Temperature Metallic Antiferroma...

    2024 doi

  50. [58]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. S mejkal, C.-J. Kang, and C. Kim, Broken Kramers Degeneracy in Altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036702 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.036702

    2024 doi

  51. [59]

    Krempask\'y et al., Altermagnetic lifting of Kramers spin degeneracy, Nature 626, 517 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06907-7

    J. Krempask\'y et al., Altermagnetic lifting of Kramers spin degeneracy, Nature 626, 517 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06907-7

    2024 doi

  52. [60]

    Osumi, S

    T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, Observation of a giant band splitting in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. B 109, 115102 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.115102

    2024 doi

  53. [61]

    See supplementary Material

Pith tools

Reviewed May 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.