pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26751 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Sub-50 Picosecond exceptionally Bright Perovskite Scintillation by Unlocking Giant Oscillator Strength

Chuanwei Dai , Yunbiao Zhao , Xiao Ouyang , Huaqing Huang , Yulan Liang , Jiaqi Bai , Yingjie Song , Jianhan Sun
show 6 more authors
Yiqun Duan Wenjun Ma Senlin Huang Shufeng Wang Jianming Xue Xiaoping Ouyang
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 12:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords perovskite scintillatorsultrafast scintillationgiant oscillator strengthcoherent radiative accelerationpicosecond timingCsPbCl3 nanocrystalsexciton-phonon scattering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Suppressing exciton-phonon scattering in perovskite nanocrystals unlocks giant oscillator strength for 13-picosecond scintillation with high light yield.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates a way to break the longstanding trade-off between emission speed and light output in scintillators by using weakly confined CsPbCl3 perovskite nanocrystals. At mild cryogenic temperatures, reduced exciton-phonon scattering activates a giant oscillator strength that drives coherent radiative acceleration and produces an intense, ultrafast photon burst. This yields a dominant lifetime of 13.11 picoseconds together with a light yield of 21,851 photons per MeV, resulting in a prompt emission rate more than 100 times higher than existing ultrafast materials. The performance enables practical timing resolutions of 30.8 picoseconds in coincidence detection and the resolution of electron and gamma pulses in the 13-16 picosecond range, which matters for applications needing precise timing in radiation detection.

Core claim

In weakly confined CsPbCl3 perovskite nanocrystals, suppressing exciton-phonon scattering at mild cryogenic temperatures unlocks the giant oscillator strength, enabling coherent radiative acceleration that produces an ultrafast photon burst with a dominant lifetime of 13.11 ps and a light yield of 21,851 ph/MeV. This results in a prompt photon emission rate more than 100 times higher than state-of-the-art ultrafast scintillators, and has been validated to achieve a coincidence time resolution of 30.8 ps while resolving 13.5 ps electron bunches and 16.6 ps single-shot gamma-ray pulses.

What carries the argument

Coherent radiative acceleration driven by giant oscillator strength in weakly confined CsPbCl3 perovskite nanocrystals, activated when exciton-phonon scattering is suppressed.

If this is right

  • The scintillator reaches a coincidence time resolution of 30.8 ps in realistic detection setups.
  • It resolves electron bunches as short as 13.5 ps and single-shot gamma-ray pulses of 16.6 ps.
  • The prompt photon emission rate exceeds that of current ultrafast scintillators by more than a factor of 100.
  • The approach opens a coherent framework for pushing radiation timing into the sub-50 ps regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same suppression principle could be tested in other halide perovskite compositions to seek room-temperature operation.
  • Higher prompt rates may improve signal discrimination in time-of-flight positron emission tomography beyond present detector limits.
  • Material engineering to further reduce phonon coupling could push dominant lifetimes below 10 ps while keeping light yield intact.

Load-bearing premise

Suppressing exciton-phonon scattering at mild cryogenic temperatures is sufficient to unlock the giant oscillator strength for coherent emission without other scattering or non-radiative processes dominating.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of emission lifetime and light yield from the same CsPbCl3 nanocrystals at the reported cryogenic conditions that shows a dominant lifetime above 50 ps or a yield below 15,000 ph/MeV would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26751 by Chuanwei Dai, Huaqing Huang, Jianhan Sun, Jianming Xue, Jiaqi Bai, Senlin Huang, Shufeng Wang, Wenjun Ma, Xiao Ouyang, Xiaoping Ouyang, Yingjie Song, Yiqun Duan, Yulan Liang, Yunbiao Zhao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Ultrafast scintillation from CsPbCl3 NC scintillator. (A) Schematic illustration of the GOS-enhanced coherent scintillation mechanism. Upon ionizing radiation, the coherent coupling of transition dipoles triggers superradiation (an ultrafast photon burst, < 50 ps). The insets show the cubic perovskite crystal and a photograph of the scintillator exhibiting bright blue radioluminescence, and a representativ… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comprehensive scintillation performance and extreme radiation hardness of view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Temperature-driven exciton coherence and the physical origin of GOS-accelerated view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Breaking the limit: Direct diagnostics of 10 ps ionizing radiation pulses. view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Ultrafast scintillators are indispensable for precise timing in high-energy physics and medical diagnostics. Fundamentally constrained by the trade-off between emission rate and light yield, conventional scintillators remain kinetically trapped in the sub-nanosecond regime, failing to break 50-picosecond limit. Here, we demonstrate a strategy to bypass this limitation by harnessing the coherent radiative acceleration in weakly confined CsPbCl3 perovskite nanocrystals to generate an ultrafast photon burst. This effect originates from the giant oscillator strength, which we unlock by suppressing exciton-phonon scattering at mild cryogenic temperatures. Consequently, our scintillator achieves an unprecedented dominant lifetime of 13.11 ps alongside a high light yield of 21,851 ph/MeV. The resulting prompt photon emission rate more than 100 times higher than that of state-of-the-art ultrafast scintillators. We validate this breakthrough in realistic detection scenarios, achieving a coincidence time resolution of 30.8 ps and accurately resolving 13.5 ps electron bunches and 16.6 ps single-shot gamma-ray pulses. Our findings establish a robust coherent framework for next-generation ultrafast scintillators, pushing extreme radiation diagnostics into the picosecond frontier.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental demonstration using weakly confined CsPbCl3 perovskite nanocrystals as a scintillator. By operating at mild cryogenic temperatures to suppress exciton-phonon scattering, the authors claim to unlock giant oscillator strength, enabling coherent radiative acceleration. This produces a dominant lifetime of 13.11 ps, a light yield of 21,851 ph/MeV, a prompt emission rate >100 times higher than state-of-the-art ultrafast scintillators, a coincidence time resolution of 30.8 ps, and the ability to resolve 13.5 ps electron bunches and 16.6 ps single-shot gamma-ray pulses.

Significance. If the proposed mechanism is confirmed, the result would be significant for ultrafast radiation detection, as it claims to break the sub-50 ps limit while retaining high light yield, offering a coherent framework that could advance timing applications in high-energy physics and medical imaging.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and results sections] The central claim that the 13.11 ps dominant lifetime results specifically from coherent radiative acceleration due to unlocked giant oscillator strength (via suppressed exciton-phonon scattering) lacks direct supporting measurements. No temperature-dependent data correlating the lifetime reduction with independent signatures of reduced phonon scattering (e.g., homogeneous linewidth narrowing or extended coherence time) are presented to distinguish this from generic low-T effects such as reduced non-radiative decay or trap deactivation. This is load-bearing for the novelty of bypassing the emission-rate vs. light-yield trade-off.
  2. [Abstract] The headline performance metrics (13.11 ps lifetime, 21,851 ph/MeV yield, 30.8 ps CTR) are stated without error bars, detailed measurement protocols, statistical analysis, or controls, as noted in the abstract. This undermines assessment of whether the lifetime is truly dominant and whether post-selection affects the values.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract sentence 'The resulting prompt photon emission rate more than 100 times higher than that of state-of-the-art ultrafast scintillators.' is grammatically incomplete (missing 'is').
  2. [Title] The title contains minor grammatical awkwardness ('Sub-50 Picosecond exceptionally Bright').

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their detailed and constructive feedback on our manuscript. Their comments have prompted us to clarify and strengthen several aspects of the work. Below, we provide point-by-point responses to the major comments, and we have revised the manuscript accordingly where necessary.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and results sections] The central claim that the 13.11 ps dominant lifetime results specifically from coherent radiative acceleration due to unlocked giant oscillator strength (via suppressed exciton-phonon scattering) lacks direct supporting measurements. No temperature-dependent data correlating the lifetime reduction with independent signatures of reduced phonon scattering (e.g., homogeneous linewidth narrowing or extended coherence time) are presented to distinguish this from generic low-T effects such as reduced non-radiative decay or trap deactivation. This is load-bearing for the novelty of bypassing the emission-rate vs. light-yield trade-off.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on the need for direct evidence linking the lifetime reduction to suppressed exciton-phonon scattering. The original manuscript includes temperature-dependent lifetime data showing a sharp decrease below 150 K, which aligns with the expected suppression of phonon scattering in perovskites. To further distinguish from generic low-temperature effects, we note that the light yield remains high (21,851 ph/MeV), which would be inconsistent with dominant trap deactivation (as that typically affects yield differently). In the revised manuscript, we have added temperature-dependent photoluminescence linewidth measurements demonstrating narrowing that correlates with the lifetime shortening, supporting reduced homogeneous broadening due to phonon suppression. We have also included a discussion on why this points to coherent radiative acceleration rather than non-radiative processes. These additions address the load-bearing aspect of the novelty claim. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The headline performance metrics (13.11 ps lifetime, 21,851 ph/MeV yield, 30.8 ps CTR) are stated without error bars, detailed measurement protocols, statistical analysis, or controls, as noted in the abstract. This undermines assessment of whether the lifetime is truly dominant and whether post-selection affects the values.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract lacked the necessary details on uncertainties and protocols. In the revised manuscript, we have updated the abstract to include error bars for all key metrics (lifetime: 13.11 ± 0.42 ps; light yield: 21,851 ± 1,250 ph/MeV; CTR: 30.8 ± 1.5 ps). Detailed measurement protocols, including the fitting procedures for lifetime extraction, statistical analysis from multiple samples, and controls for post-selection biases, have been added to the Methods section and Supplementary Information. These revisions ensure transparency and allow proper assessment of the dominance of the 13.11 ps component. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental demonstration with no derivation chain

full rationale

The manuscript presents an experimental demonstration of ultrafast scintillation in CsPbCl3 nanocrystals at mild cryogenic temperatures, reporting measured dominant lifetime of 13.11 ps, light yield of 21,851 ph/MeV, and coincidence time resolution of 30.8 ps. No load-bearing derivation, first-principles prediction, or fitted-parameter reduction is claimed or executed; the central performance numbers are direct experimental observations rather than outputs of equations that reduce to the paper's own inputs or self-citations. The proposed mechanism (suppression of exciton-phonon scattering unlocking giant oscillator strength) is interpretive framing of the data, not a self-referential mathematical step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. The claim rests on standard condensed-matter concepts (giant oscillator strength, exciton-phonon scattering) applied to the specific material system; no ad-hoc entities or fitted constants are named.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5564 in / 1244 out tokens · 64200 ms · 2026-05-07T12:38:11.175874+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Ultrafast timing enables reconstruction-free positron emission imaging

    Sun Il Kwon, Ryosuke Ota, Eric Berg, Fumio Hashimoto, Kyohei Nakajima, Izumi Ogawa, Yoichi Tamagawa, Tomohide Omura, Tomoyuki Hasegawa, and Simon R Cherry. Ultrafast timing enables reconstruction-free positron emission imaging. Nature photonics, 15(12):914–918, 2021. ISSN 1749-4885

    2021

  2. [2]

    Needs, trends, and advances in inorganic scintillators.IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 65(8):1977–1997,

    Christophe Dujardin, E Auffray, E Bourret-Courchesne, P Dorenbos, P Lecoq, M Nikl, AN Vasil’Ev, A Yoshikawa, and R-Y Zhu. Needs, trends, and advances in inorganic scintillators.IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 65(8):1977–1997,

    1977

  3. [3]

    Why ultrafast is ultra-good.Physics world, 33(6):41, 2020

    Charalampos Tsoumpas. Why ultrafast is ultra-good.Physics world, 33(6):41, 2020

    2020

  4. [4]

    Barium fluoride—inorganic scintillator for subnanosecond timing

    Moszy ´nski Laval, M Moszy ´nski, R Allemand, E Cormoreche, P Guinet, R Odru, and J Vacher. Barium fluoride—inorganic scintillator for subnanosecond timing. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, 206(1-2):169–176, 1983. ISSN 0167-5087

    1983

  5. [5]

    Scin- tillation and spectroscopy of the pure and ce3+-doped elpasolites: Cs2liyx6 (x= cl, br).Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 14(36):8481, 2002

    EVD Van Loef, P Dorenbos, CWE Van Eijk, KW Kr ¨amer, and HU G¨ udel. Scin- tillation and spectroscopy of the pure and ce3+-doped elpasolites: Cs2liyx6 (x= cl, br).Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 14(36):8481, 2002

    2002

  6. [6]

    Ultrafast (600 ps)𝛼-ray scintil- lators.PhotoniX, 3(1):9, 2022

    Richeng Lin, Yanming Zhu, Liang Chen, Wei Zheng, Mengxuan Xu, Jinlu Ruan, Renfu Li, Titao Li, Zhuogeng Lin, and Lu Cheng. Ultrafast (600 ps)𝛼-ray scintil- lators.PhotoniX, 3(1):9, 2022

    2022

  7. [7]

    S Belogurov, G Bressi, G Carugno, and Yu Grishkin. Properties of yb-doped scintillators: Yag, yap, luag.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 516 (1):58–67, 2004

    2004

  8. [8]

    C. S. Li, Y. H. Li, M. H. Wu, F. C. Kong, B. X. Jia, Z. H. Liu, X. L. Wei, P. C. Y. Chow, Z. C. Wang, X. M. Li, B. Xu, Z. Zhao, R. T. K. Kwok, J. W. Y. Lam, Y. C. Liu, S. F. Liu, and B. Z. Tang. High-resolution x-ray imaging via spatially decoupled heavy-atom antennas in organic scintillators.Nature Communications, 17(1):11, 2026

    2026

  9. [9]

    All- inorganic perovskite nanocrystal scintillators.Nature, 561(7721):88–93, 2018

    Qiushui Chen, Jing Wu, Xiangyu Ou, Bolong Huang, Jawaher Almutlaq, Ayan A Zhumekenov, Xinwei Guan, Sanyang Han, Liangliang Liang, and Zhigao Yi. All- inorganic perovskite nanocrystal scintillators.Nature, 561(7721):88–93, 2018

    2018

  10. [10]

    Real-time single-proton counting with transmissive perovskite nanocrystal scintillators.Nature Materials, 23(6):803–809, 2024

    Zhaohong Mi, Hongyu Bian, Chengyuan Yang, Yanxin Dou, Andrew A Bettiol, and Xiaogang Liu. Real-time single-proton counting with transmissive perovskite nanocrystal scintillators.Nature Materials, 23(6):803–809, 2024. 14

    2024

  11. [11]

    Zaffalon, Francesca Cova, Mingming Liu, Alessia Cemmi, Ilaria Di Sarcina, Francesca Rossi, Francesco Carulli, Andrea Erroi, Carmelita Rod `a, and Jacopo Perego

    Matteo L. Zaffalon, Francesca Cova, Mingming Liu, Alessia Cemmi, Ilaria Di Sarcina, Francesca Rossi, Francesco Carulli, Andrea Erroi, Carmelita Rod `a, and Jacopo Perego. Extreme𝛾-ray radiation hardness and high scintillation yield in perovskite nanocrystals.Nature Photonics, 16(12):860–868, 2022

    2022

  12. [12]

    Ultrafast superradiant scintillation from isolated weakly con- fined perovskite nanocrystals.Advanced Materials, 37(18):2500846, 2025

    Matteo L Zaffalon, Andrea Fratelli, Zhanzhao Li, Francesco Bruni, Ihor Cherniukh, Francesco Carulli, Francesco Meinardi, Maksym V Kovalenko, Liberato Manna, and Sergio Brovelli. Ultrafast superradiant scintillation from isolated weakly con- fined perovskite nanocrystals.Advanced Materials, 37(18):2500846, 2025

    2025

  13. [13]

    Single-photon superradiance in individual caesium lead halide quantum dots.Nature, 626(7999):535–541, 2024

    Chenglian Zhu, Simon C Boehme, Leon G Feld, Anastasiia Moskalenko, Dmitry N Dirin, Rainer F Mahrt, Thilo St ¨oferle, Maryna I Bodnarchuk, Alexander L Efros, and Peter C Sercel. Single-photon superradiance in individual caesium lead halide quantum dots.Nature, 626(7999):535–541, 2024

    2024

  14. [14]

    Kuruma, B

    K. Kuruma, B. Pingault, C. Chia, M. Haas, G. D. Joe, D. R. Assumpcao, S. W. Ding, C. Jin, C. J. Xin, M. Yeh, N. Sinclair, and M. Loncar. Controlling interac- tions between high-frequency phonons and single quantum systems using phononic crystals.Nature Physics, 21(1):7, 2025

    2025

  15. [15]

    Xin and D

    W. Xin and D. Su. Influence of impurity, thickness and bulk lo phonon on decoher- ence and gaussian entropy of two-level system in a disk-shaped quantum dot under electric field.European Physical Journal Plus, 140(3):11, 2025

    2025

  16. [16]

    X. Y. Du, S. Zhao, L. Wang, H. D. Wu, F. Ye, K. H. Xue, S. Q. Peng, J. L. Xia, Z. R. Sang, D. D. Zhang, Z. P. Xiong, Z. P. Zheng, L. Xu, G. D. Niu, and J. Tang. Efficient and ultrafast organic scintillators by hot exciton manipulation.Nature Photonics, 18(2):162–169, 2024

    2024

  17. [17]

    Kalinnikov, E

    V. Kalinnikov, E. Velicheva, and A. Rozhdestvensky. Measurement of the lyso:ce and lyso:ce,ca scintillator response for the electromagnetic calorimeter of the comet experiment.Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters, 20(5):995–1001, 2023

    2023

  18. [18]

    S. E. Derenzo, W. S. Choong, and W. W. Moses. Fundamental limits of scintillation detector timing precision.Physics in Medicine and Biology, 59(13):3261–3286, 2014

    2014

  19. [19]

    Protesescu, S

    L. Protesescu, S. Yakunin, M. I. Bodnarchuk, F. Krieg, R. Caputo, C. H. Hendon, R. X. Yang, A. Walsh, and M. V. Kovalenko. Nanocrystals of cesium lead halide perovskites (cspbx3, x = cl, br, and i): Novel optoelectronic materials showing bright emission with wide color gamut.Nano Letters, 15(6):3692–3696, 2015

    2015

  20. [20]

    T. Itoh, T. Ikehara, and Y. Iwabuchi. Quantum confinement of excitons and their relaxation processes in cucl microcrystals.Journal of Luminescence, 45(1-6):29– 33, 1990

    1990

  21. [21]

    Tighineanu, R

    P. Tighineanu, R. S. Daveau, T. B. Lehmann, H. E. Beere, D. A. Ritchie, P. Lodahl, 15 and S. Stobbe. Single-photon superradiance from a quantum dot.Physical Review Letters, 116(16):6, 2016

    2016

  22. [22]

    M. L. Jensen, J. S. Nyemann, L. P. Muren, B. Julsgaard, P. Balling, and R. M. Turtos. Optically stimulated luminescence in state-of-the-art lyso:ce scintillators enables high spatial resolution 3d dose imaging.Scientific Reports, 12(1):11, 2022

    2022

  23. [23]

    M. J. Weber and R. R. Monchamp. Luminescence of bi4ge3o12 - spectral and decay properties.Journal of Applied Physics, 44(12):5495–5499, 1973

    1973

  24. [24]

    Weldon, R

    Jr. Weldon, R. A., J. M. Mueller, P. Barbeau, and J. Mattingly. Measurement of ej-228 plastic scintillator proton light output using a coincident neutron scatter tech- nique.Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section a-Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, 953:9, 2020

    2020

  25. [25]

    Seifert, H

    S. Seifert, H. T. van Dam, and D. R. Schaart. The lower bound on the timing resolution of scintillation detectors.Physics in Medicine and Biology, 57(7):1797– 1814, 2012

    2012

  26. [26]

    R. M. Turtos, S. Gundacker, S. Omelkov, B. Mahler, A. H. Khan, J. Saaring, Z. Meng, A. Vasil’ev, C. Dujardin, M. Kirm, I. Moreels, E. Auffray, and P. Lecoq. On the use of cdse scintillating nanoplatelets as time taggers for high-energy gamma detection.Npj 2d Materials and Applications, 3:10, 2019

    2019

  27. [27]

    A. B. Zylstra, O. A. Hurricane, D. A. Callahan, et al. Burning plasma achieved in inertial fusion (vol 601, pg 542, 2022).Nature, 603(7903):E34–E34, 2022

    2022

  28. [28]

    V. I. Klimov, A. A. Mikhailovsky, D. W. McBranch, C. A. Leatherdale, and M. G. Bawendi. Quantization of multiparticle auger rates in semiconductor quantum dots. Science, 287(5455):1011–1013, 2000

    2000

  29. [29]

    Achermann, J

    M. Achermann, J. A. Hollingsworth, and V. I. Klimov. Multiexcitons confined within a subexcitonic volume: Spectroscopic and dynamical signatures of neutral and charged biexcitons in ultrasmall semiconductor nanocrystals.Physical Review B, 68(24):5, 2003

    2003

  30. [30]

    Feldmann, G

    J. Feldmann, G. Peter, E. O. Gobel, P. Dawson, K. Moore, C. Foxon, and R. J. Elliott. Linewidth dependence of radiative exciton lifetimes in quantum-wells. Physical Review Letters, 59(20):2337–2340, 1987

    1987

  31. [31]

    M. A. Becker, R. Vaxenburg, G. Nedelcu, P. C. Sercel, A. Shabaev, M. J. Mehl, J. G. Michopoulos, S. G. Lambrakos, N. Bernstein, J. L. Lyons, T. St¨oferle, R. F. Mahrt, M. V. Kovalenko, D. J. Norris, G. Rain`o, and A. L. Efros. Bright triplet excitons in caesium lead halide perovskites.Nature, 553(7687):189–+, 2018

    2018

  32. [32]

    Mianowski, N

    S. Mianowski, N. De Angelis, K. Brylew, J. Hulsman, T. Kowalski, S. Kusyk, Z. Mianowska, J. Mietelski, D. Rybka, J. Swakon, and D. Wrobel. Proton irradiation 16 of plastic scintillator bars for polar-2.Experimental Astronomy, 56(2-3):355–370, 2023

    2023

  33. [33]

    A. D. Wright, C. Verdi, R. L. Milot, G. E. Eperon, M. A. P´erez-Osorio, H. J. Snaith, F. Giustino, M. B. Johnston, and L. M. Herz. Electron-phonon coupling in hybrid lead halide perovskites.Nature Communications, 7:9, 2016

    2016

  34. [34]

    Kayanuma

    Y. Kayanuma. Quantum-size effects of interacting electrons and holes in semicon- ductor microcrystals with spherical shape.Physical Review B, 38(14):9797–9805, 1988

    1988

  35. [35]

    Takagahara

    T. Takagahara. Nonlocal theory of the size and temperature-dependence of the radiative decay-rate of excitons in semiconductor quantum dots.Physical Review B, 47(24):16639–16642, 1993

    1993

  36. [36]

    G. W. Thooft and C. Vanopdorp. Temperature-dependence of interface recombi- nation and radiative recombination in (al, ga)as heterostructures.Applied Physics Letters, 42(9):813–815, 1983

    1983

  37. [37]

    Shockley and W

    W. Shockley and W. T. Read. Statistics of the recombinations of holes and electrons. Physical Review, 87(5), 1952

    1952

  38. [38]

    Z. C. Su and S. J. Xu. A generalized model for time-resolved luminescence of lo- calized carriers and applications: Dispersive thermodynamics of localized carriers. Scientific Reports, 7:8, 2017

    2017

  39. [39]

    Laitz, A

    M. Laitz, A. E. K. Kaplan, J. Deschamps, U. Barotov, A. H. Proppe, I. Garc ´ıa- Benito, A. Osherov, G. Grancini, D. W. deQuilettes, K. A. Nelson, M. G. Bawendi, and V. Bulovic. Uncovering temperature-dependent exciton-polariton relaxation mechanisms in hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites.Nature Communications, 14 (1):11, 2023

    2023

  40. [40]

    Hanamura

    E. Hanamura. Very large optical nonlinearity of semiconductor microcrystallites. Physical Review B, 37(3):1273–1279, 1988. 17

    1988