pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.27320 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Extended Universal Rotational Curve of Spiral Galaxies

Esha Bhatia , Paolo Salucci , Tiziano Schiavone , Sandeep Haridasu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 09:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords universal rotation curvespiral galaxiesdark matterHI rotation curvesSPARC samplegalaxy mass distributiondark matter halosgalaxy dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spiral galaxies follow a single universal rotation curve out to twice their optical radius.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper extends the Universal Rotation Curve by using HI rotation curves from the SPARC sample that reach beyond the optical radius R_opt. When velocities and radii are double-normalized, the individual galaxy curves collapse onto one profile up to 2R_opt. The result shows the universal pattern persists into dark-matter-dominated outer regions. A sympathetic reader cares because it supplies tighter constraints on galaxy mass distributions and the baryon-dark matter interplay in those zones.

Core claim

The URC constructed from the SPARC sample's extended HI rotation curves maintains its universal character out to 2R_opt, with the double-normalized rotation curves collapsing onto a single profile. This extended URC provides new insights into the interplay between baryonic matter and dark matter in shaping galaxy rotation curves, particularly in the outer regions where dark matter dominates.

What carries the argument

The double-normalized rotation curve, formed by scaling each galaxy's velocities and radii so that diverse curves collapse onto one common profile.

If this is right

  • Galaxy mass models gain improved constraints from the outer, dark-matter-dominated regions.
  • The universal profile offers additional tests for the interplay between baryons and dark matter.
  • Refined understanding of mass distribution can inform the nature of dark matter particles.
  • The paradigm previously limited to R_opt is now reinforced at larger radii.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The single profile may indicate that dark matter halos around spirals share a common density structure shaped by similar formation processes.
  • Applying the same normalization to rotation curves from hydrodynamic simulations could check whether current galaxy-formation models reproduce the collapse.
  • Deeper HI observations reaching beyond 2R_opt could test whether the universal character continues further out.

Load-bearing premise

The SPARC HI rotation curves supply accurate, unbiased extensions beyond R_opt and the chosen double-normalization does not artificially force the observed collapse.

What would settle it

A larger sample of spiral galaxies with independent extended rotation curves to 2R_opt that fails to collapse onto the same double-normalized profile.

read the original abstract

In this work, we aim to advance the Universal Rotation Curve (URC) paradigm by leveraging new data and extending its observational domain. Building on previous studies that established the URC using optical rotation curves reaching the galaxy optical radius $R_{opt}$, we exploit the SPARC sample's extended HI rotation curves to construct the URC out to $2R_{opt}$. This crucial extension enables us to investigate the mass distribution of spiral galaxies in a region dominated by dark matter an important step to better constrain galaxy mass models and to explore the nature of the dark matter particle. We find that the URC constructed from the SPARC sample's extended HI rotation curves maintains its universal character out to $2R_{opt}$, with the double-normalized rotation curves collapsing onto a single profile. This extended URC provides new insights into the interplay between baryonic matter and dark matter in shaping galaxy rotation curves, particularly in the outer regions where dark matter dominates. Our results not only reinforce the URC paradigm but also refine our understanding of the mass distribution in spiral galaxies, offering new constraints on galaxy mass models and implications for the nature of dark matter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the Universal Rotation Curve (URC) paradigm can be extended to 2R_opt by using the extended HI rotation curves from the SPARC sample of spiral galaxies. It asserts that double-normalized curves (r/R_opt, V/V(R_opt)) collapse onto a single universal profile in this outer, dark-matter-dominated regime, providing new constraints on galaxy mass models and the nature of dark matter.

Significance. If the claimed collapse is demonstrated with transparent methods, quantitative scatter metrics, and controls for normalization artifacts, the result would meaningfully extend the URC framework into the DM-dominated outskirts and offer testable constraints on mass models. The choice of the SPARC sample for extended HI data is a logical step, but the absence of supporting details in the abstract and (presumably) methods limits the immediate impact.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the double-normalized rotation curves 'collapse onto a single profile' out to 2R_opt is stated without any description of the normalization procedure, sample size, selection criteria, or quantitative measure of residual scatter. Because normalization by R_opt and V(R_opt) forces every curve through the point (1,1) by construction, the absence of these details makes it impossible to distinguish genuine universality from an artifact of the chosen scaling.
  2. [Methods / Results] Methods / Results (unspecified sections): No information is given on how uncertainties in the outer HI points are propagated, how sparse or noisy data beyond R_opt are handled, or whether the normalization scales are fitted to minimize scatter versus being independently measured. This is load-bearing for the universality claim, as systematic underestimation of outer velocity errors or selection toward flat-curve galaxies could produce apparent convergence even if individual mass distributions differ.
  3. [Results] Results: The manuscript provides no test against alternative normalizations (e.g., using V at 1.5 R_opt or a fixed physical radius) and no statistical comparison of scatter before versus after normalization. Without such controls, the assertion that the URC 'maintains its universal character' cannot be evaluated against the skeptic's concern that the procedure may mask intrinsic variation in the DM-dominated regime.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by including at least the number of galaxies retained after quality cuts and a brief statement of the measured post-normalization scatter.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for R_opt and V(R_opt) should be defined explicitly on first use, including how these quantities are extracted from the SPARC data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity, add quantitative details, and include requested controls.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the double-normalized rotation curves 'collapse onto a single profile' out to 2R_opt is stated without any description of the normalization procedure, sample size, selection criteria, or quantitative measure of residual scatter. Because normalization by R_opt and V(R_opt) forces every curve through the point (1,1) by construction, the absence of these details makes it impossible to distinguish genuine universality from an artifact of the chosen scaling.

    Authors: We agree the abstract is too concise and will expand it in revision to state the sample (SPARC galaxies with HI curves extending to at least 2R_opt), the normalization (R_opt and V(R_opt) taken from independent optical measurements in the SPARC catalog), and a quantitative scatter metric (rms deviation from the mean profile in the outer region). While all curves pass through (1,1) by definition, the universality claim refers to the consistency of the shape for r > R_opt, where the HI data are independent of the optical normalization scales; we will clarify this distinction explicitly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods / Results] Methods / Results (unspecified sections): No information is given on how uncertainties in the outer HI points are propagated, how sparse or noisy data beyond R_opt are handled, or whether the normalization scales are fitted to minimize scatter versus being independently measured. This is load-bearing for the universality claim, as systematic underestimation of outer velocity errors or selection toward flat-curve galaxies could produce apparent convergence even if individual mass distributions differ.

    Authors: The Methods section describes the SPARC data selection and quality cuts, but we acknowledge the presentation of error handling can be made more explicit. R_opt and V(R_opt) are taken directly from the catalog's optical measurements and are not adjusted or fitted to the HI data. Outer HI points are included only when they satisfy the SPARC quality flags and extend reliably beyond R_opt; uncertainties are propagated from the published velocity errors. We will add a dedicated paragraph on error propagation, data sparsity handling, and selection criteria to rule out the suggested biases. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results] Results: The manuscript provides no test against alternative normalizations (e.g., using V at 1.5 R_opt or a fixed physical radius) and no statistical comparison of scatter before versus after normalization. Without such controls, the assertion that the URC 'maintains its universal character' cannot be evaluated against the skeptic's concern that the procedure may mask intrinsic variation in the DM-dominated regime.

    Authors: We agree that explicit controls strengthen the result. In the revised manuscript we will add (i) a direct comparison of rms scatter in the double-normalized curves versus the raw (un-normalized) curves at radii beyond R_opt and (ii) a test using an alternative normalization scale such as V(1.5 R_opt). These additions will quantify the reduction in scatter due to the standard URC normalization and address concerns about masking intrinsic variation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper reports an observational result: constructing the URC from SPARC HI rotation curves and observing that double-normalized profiles (r/R_opt, V/V(R_opt)) collapse onto a single curve out to 2R_opt. This is presented as an empirical finding from the data, not a derivation that reduces to its own inputs by construction. Double-normalization is a standard technique in prior URC literature and does not constitute a fitted parameter renamed as prediction here. No self-citation load-bearing steps, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked in the provided text to force the result. The central claim remains an independent data-driven statement about the sample, with no quoted equations or procedures that equate the output to the normalization choice itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the representativeness of the SPARC sample and the reliability of HI data as true rotation tracers beyond the optical disk; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly listed in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • double-normalization scales
    Radius and velocity scaling factors are applied to collapse the curves; their exact determination is not detailed but is central to the universality claim.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption SPARC galaxies are representative of the broader spiral galaxy population.
    Universality is asserted from this sample alone.
  • domain assumption HI rotation curves accurately trace the gravitational potential beyond R_opt.
    Required for the extension to be meaningful.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5506 in / 1200 out tokens · 73704 ms · 2026-05-07T09:21:17.654527+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Persic, P

    M. Persic, P. Salucci, The Universal Galaxy Rotation Curve. Astrophysical Journal368, 60 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1086/169670

    work page doi:10.1086/169670 1991

  2. [2]

    1996, MNRAS, 281, 27, doi: 10.1093/mnras/278.1.27

    M. Persic, P. Salucci, F. Stel, The universal rotation curve of spiral galaxies — I. The dark matter connection. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society281(1), 27– 47 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/278.1.27. arXiv:astro-ph/9506004 [astro-ph]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/278.1.27 1996

  3. [3]

    The distribution of dark matter in galaxies , volume=

    P. Salucci, The distribution of dark matter in galaxies. Astronomy & Astrophysics Review27(1), 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-018-0113-1. arXiv:1811.08843 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-018-0113-1 2019

  4. [4]

    2007, MNRAS, 378, 910, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11817.x

    E. Noordermeer, J.M. van der Hulst, R. Sancisi, R.S. Swaters, T.S. van Albada, The mass distribution in early-type disc galaxies: declining rotation curves and correlations with optical properties. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society376(4), 1513–1546 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11533.x. arXiv:astro- ph/0701731 [astro-ph]

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11533.x 2007

  5. [5]

    ApJ , year = 1970, month = jun, volume =

    K.C. Freeman, On the disks of spiral and SO Galaxies. Astrophys. J.160, 811 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1086/150474 22

    work page doi:10.1086/150474 1970

  6. [6]

    Salucci, Dark Matter in Galaxies: Evidences and Challenges

    P. Salucci, Dark Matter in Galaxies: Evidences and Challenges. Foundations of Physics48(10), 1517–1537 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-018-0209-5. arXiv:1807.08541 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page doi:10.1007/s10701-018-0209-5 2018

  7. [7]

    2007, MNRAS, 378, 910, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11817.x

    P. Salucci, A. Lapi, C. Tonini, G. Gentile, I. Yegorova, U. Klein, The Universal Rotation Curve of Spiral Galaxies. 2. The Dark Matter Distribution out to the Virial Radius. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.378, 41–47 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007. 11696.x. arXiv:astro-ph/0703115

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007 2007

  8. [8]

    Karukes, P

    E.V . Karukes, P. Salucci, The universal rotation curve of dwarf disc galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society465(4), 4703–4722 (2017). https://doi.org/ 10.1093/mnras/stw3055. arXiv:1609.06903 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3055 2017

  9. [9]

    Di Paolo, P

    C. Di Paolo, P. Salucci, A. Erkurt, The universal rotation curve of low surface brightness galaxies - IV . The interrelation between dark and luminous matter. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society490(4), 5451–5477 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/stz2700. arXiv:1805.07165 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    Catinella, R

    B. Catinella, R. Giovanelli, M.P. Haynes, Template Rotation Curves for Disk Galax- ies. Astrophysical Journal640(2), 751–761 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1086/500171. arXiv:astro-ph/0512051 [astro-ph]

    work page doi:10.1086/500171 2006

  11. [11]

    Salucci, et al., Einstein, Planck and Vera Rubin: relevant encounters between the Cosmological and the Quantum Worlds

    P. Salucci, et al., Einstein, Planck and Vera Rubin: relevant encounters between the Cosmological and the Quantum Worlds. Frontiers in Physics8, 579 (2021). https: //doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.603190. arXiv:2011.09278 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.603190 2021

  12. [12]

    Salucci, C

    P. Salucci, C. di Paolo, Fundamental Properties of the Dark and the Luminous Matter from the Low Surface Brightness Discs. Universe7(9), 344 (2021). https://doi.org/10. 3390/universe7090344

    2021

  13. [13]

    H.J. Mo, S. Mao, S.D.M. White, The Formation of galactic disks. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.295, 319 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01227.x. arXiv:astro-ph/9707093

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01227.x 1998

  14. [14]

    Kravtsov, The size–virial radius relation of galaxies

    A.V . Kravtsov, The size–virial radius relation of galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal Letters764(2012). URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:119204308

    2012

  15. [15]

    L ´opez Fune, Empirical velocity profiles for galactic rotation curves

    E. L ´opez Fune, Empirical velocity profiles for galactic rotation curves. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society475(2), 2132–2163 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/stx3245. arXiv:1712.03880 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    A. Lapi, P. Salucci, L. Danese, Precision Scaling Relations for Disk Galaxies in the Local Universe. Astrophysical Journal859(1), 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/aabf35. arXiv:1804.06086 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    Capozziello , V

    I.A. Yegorova, P. Salucci, The radial Tully-Fisher relation for spiral galaxies - I. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society377(2), 507–515 (2007). https://doi.org/10. 23 1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11637.x. arXiv:astro-ph/0612434 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2007

  18. [18]

    M.H. Rhee,Synthetic Rotation Curves of Spiral Galaxies: a PCA Approach, inDark and Visible Matter in Galaxies and Cosmological Implications,Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, vol. 117, ed. by M. Persic, P. Salucci (1997), p. 90

    1997

  19. [19]

    S., & Schombert, J

    F. Lelli, S.S. McGaugh, J.M. Schombert, SPARC: Mass Models for 175 Disk Galaxies with Spitzer Photometry and Accurate Rotation Curves. Astronomical Journal152(6), 157 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/157. arXiv:1606.09251 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/157 2016

  20. [20]

    Karachentsev, L.N

    I.D. Karachentsev, L.N. Makarova, R.B. Tully, L. Rizzi, E.J. Shaya, TRGB Distances to Galaxies in Front of the Virgo Cluster. Astrophysical Journal858(1), 62 (2018). https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aabaf1. arXiv:1804.00469 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabaf1 2018

  21. [21]

    McQuinn, M

    K.B.W. McQuinn, M. Boyer, E.D. Skillman, A.E. Dolphin, Using the Tip of the Red Giant Branch As a Distance Indicator in the Near Infrared. Astrophysical Jour- nal880(1), 63 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab2627. arXiv:1904.01571 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2627 2019

  22. [22]

    Stellar Candles for the Extragalactic Distance Scale , year = 2003, editor =

    P. Fouque, J. Storm, W. Gieren, Calibration of the distance scale from Cepheids. Lect. Notes Phys.635, 21–44 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39882-0 2. arXiv:astro-ph/0301291

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39882-0 2003

  23. [23]

    Taylor, W.M

    A.R. Taylor, W.M. Goss, P.H. Coleman, J. van Leeuwen, B.J. Wallace, A Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope 327 MHz Survey of the Galactic Plane. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series107, 239 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1086/192363

    work page doi:10.1086/192363 1996

  24. [24]

    Petrov, E.K

    L. Petrov, E.K. Mahony, P.G. Edwards, E.M. Sadler, F.K. Schinzel, D. McConnell, Aus- tralia Telescope Compact Array observations of Fermi unassociated sources. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society432(2), 1294–1302 (2013). https://doi.org/ 10.1093/mnras/stt550. arXiv:1301.2386 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt550 2013

  25. [25]

    McGaugh, V .C

    S.S. McGaugh, V .C. Rubin, W.J.G. de Blok, High-Resolution Rotation Curves of Low Surface Brightness Galaxies. I. Data. Astronomical Journal122(5), 2381–2395 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1086/323448. arXiv:astro-ph/0107326 [astro-ph]

    work page doi:10.1086/323448 2001

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    R.A. Swaters, R. Sancisi, T.S. van Albada, J.M. van der Hulst, The rotation curves shapes of late-type dwarf galaxies. Astronomy & Astrophysics493(3), 871–892 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200810516. arXiv:0901.4222 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810516 2009

  27. [27]

    Meidt, et al., Reconstructing the stellar mass distributions of galaxies using S 4G IRAC 3.6 and 4.5µm images: II

    S.E. Meidt, et al., Reconstructing the stellar mass distributions of galaxies using S 4G IRAC 3.6 and 4.5µm images: II. The conversion from light to mass. Astrophys. J.788, 144 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/788/2/144. arXiv:1402.5210 [astro- ph.GA] 24

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/788/2/144 2014

  28. [28]

    McGaugh, F

    S.S. McGaugh, F. Lelli, J.M. Schombert, Radial Acceleration Relation in Rotationally Supported Galaxies. Physical Review Letters117(20), 201101 (2016). https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.201101. arXiv:1609.05917 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.201101 2016

  29. [29]

    Rodrigues, A

    D.C. Rodrigues, A. del Popolo, V . Marra, P.L.C. de Oliveira, Evidence against cuspy dark matter haloes in large galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society470(2), 2410–2426 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1384. arXiv:1701.02698 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1384 2017

  30. [30]

    de Almeida, L

    ´A. de Almeida, L. Amendola, V . Niro, Galaxy rotation curves in modified gravity models. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2018(8), 012 (2018). https: //doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/08/012. arXiv:1805.11067 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/08/012 2018

  31. [31]

    P. Li, F. Lelli, S. McGaugh, J. Schombert, A Comprehensive Catalog of Dark Matter Halo Models for SPARC Galaxies. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series247(1), 31 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ab700e. arXiv:2001.10538 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab700e 2020

  32. [32]

    https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv

    M. Khelashvili, A. Rudakovskyi, S. Hossenfelder, SPARC galaxies prefer Dark Matter over MOND. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2401.10202 (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 2401.10202. arXiv:2401.10202 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Stone, S

    C. Stone, S. Courteau, N. Arora, M. Frosst, T.H. Jarrett, PROBES. I. A Compendium of Deep Rotation Curves and Matched Multiband Photometry. Astrophysical Jour- nal Supplement Series262(1), 33 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ac83ad. arXiv:2209.09912 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac83ad 2022

  34. [34]

    Shankar, A

    F. Shankar, A. Lapi, P. Salucci, G. De Zotti, L. Danese, New relationships between galaxy properties and host halo mass, and the role of feedbacks in galaxy forma- tion. Astrophys. J.643, 14–25 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1086/502794. arXiv:astro- ph/0601577

    work page doi:10.1086/502794 2006

  35. [35]

    F., Frenk, C

    J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk, S.D.M. White, The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos. Astrophysical Journal462, 563 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1086/177173. arXiv:astro- ph/9508025 [astro-ph]

    work page doi:10.1086/177173 1996

  36. [36]

    Tully, J.R

    R.B. Tully, J.R. Fisher, A new method of determining distances to galaxies. Astronomy & Astrophysics54, 661–673 (1977)

    1977

  37. [37]

    and Schombert, James M

    S.S. McGaugh, J.M. Schombert, Color-Mass-to-light-ratio Relations for Disk Galaxies. Astronomical Journal148(5), 77 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/148/5/77. arXiv:1407.1839 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/148/5/77 2014

  38. [38]

    Akaike, A new look at the statistical model identification

    H. Akaike, A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control19(6), 716–723 (1974)

    1974

  39. [39]

    Burnham, D.R

    K.P. Burnham, D.R. Anderson,Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd edn. (Springer, 2002) 25

    2002

  40. [40]

    Burnham, D.R

    K.P. Burnham, D.R. Anderson, Multimodel inference: Understanding aic and bic in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research33(2), 261–304 (2004) 26 Fig. 4: The plot visualizes the URC-2opt from the SPARC galaxies. At the top we plot the 48 2N velocity data that form the ensemble of coadded measurements of SPARC from a vantage point illustrating that ...

    2004