arxiv: 2604.27541 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Low mass scalars at e^+e- colliders

Tania Robens

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 09:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords low-mass scalarsHiggs factoriese+e- collidersextended Higgs sectorsnew physics searchesscalar particlesbeyond Standard Model

0 comments

The pith

Recent model developments make low-mass scalars feasible for detection at Higgs factories.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reviews the search for low-mass scalar particles at future electron-positron colliders, known as Higgs factories, and the models that allow such particles to exist. It focuses on updates that address prior difficulties in keeping these scalars consistent with existing data. A sympathetic reader would care because these particles could represent new physics if observed. The discussion shows how specific models now permit light scalars while meeting constraints.

Core claim

The paper establishes that recent developments have rendered low-mass scalars feasible in available models at Higgs factories, allowing them to remain consistent with current constraints and be probed at e+e- colliders.

What carries the argument

Models of extended Higgs sectors that accommodate low-mass scalars while satisfying current experimental bounds, enabling searches at future colliders.

If this is right

Low-mass scalars can be directly searched for at Higgs factories using specific production and decay channels.
Updated models provide concrete predictions for observable signals at e+e- colliders.
These developments allow for the feasibility of light scalars in theories beyond the Standard Model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Successful detection would provide insights into the structure of the Higgs sector.
Non-observation could further constrain model parameters or rule out certain extensions.
Connections to other new physics phenomena might be explored through scalar couplings.

Load-bearing premise

The models discussed remain consistent with all current experimental constraints and can be probed at future e+e- colliders.

What would settle it

A direct search at a Higgs factory that either observes a low-mass scalar signal or sets limits incompatible with the proposed models.

read the original abstract

I briefly discuss the search for low mass scalars at Higgs factories as well as available models that render such scalars feasible, where I focus on new developments since the review presented in arXiv:2205.09687 (see also arXiv:2504.11969 for a recent update).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a short discussion note updating the status of low-mass scalar searches at Higgs factories, with no new calculations or results of its own.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this is a short discussion note updating the community on low mass scalars at future e+e- colliders, with a focus on new model developments since the 2022 review. The paper does a solid job of outlining the search strategies at Higgs factories and pointing out how certain models have evolved to accommodate these light particles without running into immediate contradictions with existing data. It references the key papers and keeps the presentation straightforward. What it does not do is provide any new analysis, parameter space scans, or quantitative projections. Everything is drawn from the cited works, so the strength of the note is only as good as those sources. There are no internal inconsistencies visible from the description, but also no way to verify new claims here. The soft spots are that it is quite brief and adds little beyond curation. If the goal is to inform about feasibility, it succeeds at a high level, but readers will still need to go back to the original papers for details. This kind of piece is aimed at specialists in collider BSM physics who are tracking the status of light scalar searches. It could save them some time in literature hunting but is unlikely to be cited widely or change the direction of the field. I would not recommend sending it for peer review. It fits better as a standalone arXiv preprint or perhaps a short contribution in a proceedings volume.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a short discussion note that briefly reviews searches for low-mass scalars at e+e- colliders (Higgs factories) and points to models making such scalars feasible, with emphasis on new developments since the review arXiv:2205.09687 and a reference to the update arXiv:2504.11969.

Significance. If the cited external literature is correct, the note serves as a concise pointer updating the community on the current feasibility of low-mass scalar searches at future Higgs factories. However, because the manuscript contains no original derivations, scans, or constraint calculations, its significance is limited to literature synthesis rather than advancing new results.

major comments (1)

Abstract: The central claim that 'new developments since arXiv:2205.09687 render low mass scalars feasible' is presented without any summary, key features, or verification of those developments inside the manuscript. This renders the claim non-self-contained and dependent entirely on the correctness of the two external references, which is load-bearing for the note's purpose as a discussion of feasibility.

minor comments (1)

The manuscript would benefit from a short paragraph outlining the specific new model features (e.g., parameter ranges or mechanisms) that address previous constraints, to improve accessibility without requiring readers to consult the cited preprints.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comment on the manuscript. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract: The central claim that 'new developments since arXiv:2205.09687 render low mass scalars feasible' is presented without any summary, key features, or verification of those developments inside the manuscript. This renders the claim non-self-contained and dependent entirely on the correctness of the two external references, which is load-bearing for the note's purpose as a discussion of feasibility.

Authors: We agree that the abstract would be improved by greater self-containment. The manuscript is a concise discussion note whose purpose is to highlight the existence of recent progress and direct readers to the cited works for details. In the revised version we will expand the abstract with a brief outline of the main new developments (updated viable parameter spaces in extended scalar sectors and refined search strategies at Higgs factories) that support feasibility, while retaining the note's brevity and explicit references to the full reviews. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; short discussion note with no internal derivations

full rationale

The paper is a brief discussion note summarizing searches for low-mass scalars and pointing to model updates in prior literature (arXiv:2205.09687 and arXiv:2504.11969). It contains no equations, derivations, parameter fits, or predictions of its own. The central claim rests entirely on the correctness of the cited external works rather than any self-referential step within this manuscript. No load-bearing argument reduces by construction to the paper's own inputs, and self-citations (if present) are not used to justify any novel result here. This is the expected finding for a non-technical summary.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The preprint is a review based on the abstract and introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5320 in / 904 out tokens · 32438 ms · 2026-05-07T09:20:07.662652+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Universe 8, 286 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8050286 arXiv:2205.09687 [hep-ph]

Robens, T.: A Short Overview on Low Mass Scalars at Future Lep- ton Colliders. Universe 8, 286 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8050286 arXiv:2205.09687 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.3390/universe8050286 2022
[2]

PoS CORFU2024, 077 (2025) https://doi.org/10.22323/1.490.0077 arXiv:2504.11969 [hep-ph]

Robens, T.: Extended Scalar Sectors from all angles - mostly at lepton col- liders -. PoS CORFU2024, 077 (2025) https://doi.org/10.22323/1.490.0077 arXiv:2504.11969 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.22323/1.490.0077 2025
[3]

: ECF A Higgs, Electroweak, and Top Factory Study

Altmann, J., et al. : ECF A Higgs, Electroweak, and Top Factory Study. CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs, vol. 5/2025 (2025). https://doi.org/10.23731/ CYRM-2025-005

2025
[4]

Robens, T., Santos, R.: BSM: Extended Scalar Sectors. (2025). 2507.21910

work page arXiv 2025
[5]

Bufalo, M

Abramowicz, H., et al. : Higgs physics at the CLIC electron–positron lin- ear collider. Eur. Phys. J. C 77(7), 475 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/ s10052-017-4968-5 arXiv:1608.07538 [hep-ex]

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2017
[6]

Alwall, M

Alwall, J., Herquet, M., Maltoni, F., Mattelaer, O., Stelzer, T.: MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond. JHEP 06, 128 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2011)128 arXiv:1106.0522 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2011)128 2011
[7]

EPJ Web Conf

Robens, T.: A short overview on low mass scalars at future lepton colliders. EPJ Web Conf. 315, 01025 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202431501025 arXiv:2409.19657 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/202431501025 2024
[8]

In: International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders (2023)

Robens, T.: A short overview on low mass scalars at future lepton colliders. In: International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders (2023). 2307.15962

work page arXiv 2023
[9]

Blas, J., et al.: Focus topics for the ECF A study on Higgs / Top / EW factories (2024) arXiv:2401.07564 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[10]

: Decay mode independent searches for new scalar bosons with the OPAL detector at LEP

Abbiendi, G., et al. : Decay mode independent searches for new scalar bosons with the OPAL detector at LEP. Eur. Phys. J. C 27, 311–329 (2003) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s2002-01115-1 arXiv:hep-ex/0206022

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s2002-01115-1 2003
[11]

: Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons at LEP

Schael, S., et al. : Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons at LEP. Eur. Phys. 10 J. C 47, 547–587 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s2006-02569-7 arXiv:hep- ex/0602042

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s2006-02569-7 2006
[12]

Drechsel, P., Moortgat-Pick, G., Weiglein, G.: Prospects for direct searches for light Higgs bosons at the ILC with 250 GeV. Eur. Phys. J. C 80(10), 922 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08438-1 arXiv:1801.09662 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08438-1 2020
[13]

Kozaczuk, J., Ramsey-Musolf, M.J., Shelton, J.: Exotic Higgs boson decays and the electroweak phase transition. Phys. Rev. D 101(11), 115035 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.115035 arXiv:1911.10210 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.115035 2020
[14]

Liu, Z., Wang, L.-T., Zhang, H.: Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson at future e+e− lepton colliders. Chin. Phys. C 41(6), 063102 (2017) https://doi. org/10.1088/1674-1137/41/6/063102 arXiv:1612.09284 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/41/6/063102 2017
[15]

In: Snowmass 2021 (2022)

Wang, Z., Zhu, X., Khoda, E.E., Hsu, S.-C., Konstantinidis, N., Li, K., Li, S., Ramsey-Musolf, M.J., Wu, Y., Zhang, Y.E.: Study of Electroweak Phase Transition in Exotic Higgs Decays at the CEPC. In: Snowmass 2021 (2022). 2203.10184

work page arXiv 2021
[16]

LHEP 2023, 432 (2023) https://doi.org/10.31526/lhep.2023.432 arXiv:2203.08206 [hep-ph]

Carena, M., Kozaczuk, J., Liu, Z., Ou, T., Ramsey-Musolf, M.J., Shelton, J., Wang, Y., Xie, K.-P.: Probing the Electroweak Phase Transition with Exotic Higgs Decays. LHEP 2023, 432 (2023) https://doi.org/10.31526/lhep.2023.432 arXiv:2203.08206 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.31526/lhep.2023.432 2023
[17]

A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery

Aad, G., et al. : A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS exper- iment ten years after the discovery. Nature 607(7917), 52–59 (2022) https://doi. org/10.1038/s41586-022-04893-w arXiv:2207.00092 [hep-ex]. [Erratum: Nature 612, E24 (2022)]

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04893-w 2022
[18]

A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery

Tumasyan, A., et al. : A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery. Nature 607(7917), 60–68 (2022) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41586-022-04892-x arXiv:2207.00043 [hep-ex]. [Erratum: Nature 623, (2023)]

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04892-x 2022
[19]

Gunion, J.F., Haber, H.E., Wudka, J.: Sum rules for Higgs bosons. Phys. Rev. D 43, 904–912 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.43.904

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.904 1991
[20]

Robens, T., Stefaniak, T., Wittbrodt, J.: Two-real-scalar-singlet extension of the SM: LHC phenomenology and benchmark scenarios. Eur. Phys. J. C 80(2), 151 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7655-x arXiv:1908.08554 [hep- ph]

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7655-x 2020
[21]

Symmetry 15(1), 27 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15010027 arXiv:2209.10996 [hep-ph]

Robens, T.: Two-Real-Singlet-Model Benchmark Planes. Symmetry 15(1), 27 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15010027 arXiv:2209.10996 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.3390/sym15010027 2023
[22]

Coimbra, R., Sampaio, M.O.P., Santos, R.: ScannerS: Constraining the phase 11 diagram of a complex scalar singlet at the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2428 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2428-4 arXiv:1301.2599 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2428-4 2013
[23]

Mühlleitner, M., Sampaio, M.O.P., Santos, R., Wittbrodt, J.: ScannerS: param- eter scans in extended scalar sectors. Eur. Phys. J. C 82(3), 198 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10139-w arXiv:2007.02985 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10139-w 2022
[24]

Bahl, H., Biekötter, T., Heinemeyer, S., Li, C., Paasch, S., Weiglein, G., Wittbrodt, J.: HiggsTools: BSM scalar phenomenology with new versions of HiggsBounds and HiggsSignals. Comput. Phys. Commun. 291, 108803 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108803 arXiv:2210.09332 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108803 2023
[25]

Branco, G.C., Ferreira, P.M., Lavoura, L., Rebelo, M.N., Sher, M., Silva, J.P.: Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models. Phys. Rept. 516, 1–102 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002 arXiv:1106.0034 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002 2012
[26]

Misiak, M., Steinhauser, M.: Weak radiative decays of the B meson and bounds on MH ± in the Two-Higgs-Doublet Model. Eur. Phys. J. C 77(3), 201 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4776-y arXiv:1702.04571 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4776-y 2017
[27]

JHEP 01, 107 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2024)107 arXiv:2309.17431 [hep-ph]

Biekötter, T., Heinemeyer, S., No, J.M., Radchenko, K., Romacho, M.O.O., Weiglein, G.: First shot of the smoking gun: probing the electroweak phase transition in the 2HDM with novel searches for A → ZH in ℓ+ℓ−tt and ννb b final states. JHEP 01, 107 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2024)107 arXiv:2309.17431 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2024)107 2024
[28]

PoS CORFU2024, 074 (2025) https://doi.org/10.22323/1.490.0074

Zarnecki, A.F.: Prospects for light exotic scalar measurements at the e+e- Higgs factory. PoS CORFU2024, 074 (2025) https://doi.org/10.22323/1.490.0074

work page doi:10.22323/1.490.0074 2025
[29]

Cao, J., Jia, X., Lian, J.: Unified interpretation of the muon g-2 anomaly, the 95 GeV diphoton, and bb¯ excesses in the general next-to-minimal supersym- metric standard model. Phys. Rev. D 110(11), 115039 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.115039 arXiv:2402.15847 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.115039 2024
[30]

JHEP 07, 013 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2023) 013 arXiv:2302.07210 [hep-ph]

Kunčinas, A., Ogreid, O.M., Osland, P., Rebelo, M.N.: Complex S 3- symmetric 3HDM. JHEP 07, 013 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2023) 013 arXiv:2302.07210 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2023 2023
[31]

Lima, C.H., Logan, H.E.: Unavoidable Higgs coupling deviations in the Z2- symmetric Georgi-Machacek model. Phys. Rev. D 106(11), 115020 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.115020 arXiv:2209.08393 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.115020 2022
[32]

Biekötter, T., Heinemeyer, S., Weiglein, G.: The CMS di-photon excess at 95 GeV in view of the LHC Run 2 results. Phys. Lett. B 846, 138217 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138217 arXiv:2303.12018 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138217 2023
[33]

Sharma, P., Mulaudzi, A.-T., Mosala, K., Mathaha, T., Kumar, M., Mellado, 12 B., Crivellin, A., Titov, M., Ruan, M., Fang, Y.: Discovery potential of future electron-positron colliders for a 95 GeV scalar. Phys. Lett. B 870, 139953 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139953 arXiv:2407.16806 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139953 2025
[34]

Dong, Y., Ruan, M., Wang, K., Yang, H., Zhu, J.: Particle-level transformers for 95 GeV Higgs boson searches at future e+e- Higgs factories. Phys. Rev. D 113(5), 055025 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1103/13h1-zdmz arXiv:2510.24662 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1103/13h1-zdmz 2026
[35]

Dong, Y., Ruan, M., Wang, K., Yang, H., Zhu, J.: Testing a 95 GeV Scalar at the CEPC with Machine Learning*. Chin. Phys. 50(3), 031001 (2026) https: //doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/ae2ebc arXiv:2506.21454 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ae2ebc 2026
[36]

Chen, T.-K., Chiang, C.-W., Heinemeyer, S., Weiglein, G.: Interpretation of LHC excesses at 95 GeV and 152 GeV in an extended Georgi-Machacek model. Phys. Rev. D 113(7), 075027 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1103/xzl4-1fh1 arXiv:2511.04796 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/xzl4-1fh1 2026
[37]

Chang, Q., Du, X., Zhu, P.: Unified interpretation of 95 GeV di-photon and di-tau Excesses in the Georgi-Machacek Model (2025) arXiv:2509.26155 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[38]

JHEP 09, 120 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2019)120 arXiv:1907.11641 [hep-ph]

Diessner, P., Kalinowski, J., Kotlarski, W., Stöckinger, D.: Confronting the coloured sector of the MRSSM with LHC data. JHEP 09, 120 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2019)120 arXiv:1907.11641 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2019)120 2019
[39]

JHEP 07, 037 (2024) https://doi.org/10

Kalinowski, J., Kotlarski, W.: Interpreting 95 GeV di-photon/ bb excesses as a lightest Higgs boson of the MRSSM. JHEP 07, 037 (2024) https://doi.org/10. 1007/JHEP07(2024)037 arXiv:2403.08720 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[40]

Exploring Inert Scalars at CLIC

Kalinowski, J., Kotlarski, W., Robens, T., Sokolowska, D., Zarnecki, A.F.: Exploring Inert Scalars at CLIC. JHEP 07, 053 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP07(2019)053 arXiv:1811.06952 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[41]

Bal, A., Curtis, E., Magnan, A.-M., Maier, B., Robens, T., Wardle, N.: Search for additional scalar bosons within the Inert Doublet Model in a final state with two leptons at the FCC-ee. Eur. Phys. J. C 85(8), 891 (2025) https://doi.org/ 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14622-y arXiv:2504.12178 [hep-ph] 13

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14622-y 2025