pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.27608 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · 🪐 quant-ph

Quantum Magnetometry with Orientation beyond Steady-State Limits in Cavity-Magnon Systems

Zheng Liu , Ding-hui Xu , Yi-jia Yang , Chang-shui Yu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 06:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum magnetometrycavity-magnon systemstransient dynamicsquantum correlationssignal-to-noise ratiomagnetic field orientationnoise cancellationcollective magnon modes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Residual initial quantum correlations from an engineered steady state boost short-time signal-to-noise ratio in cavity-magnon magnetometry beyond unsqueezed steady-state limits while enabling full field orientation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a transient quantum sensing framework for cavity-magnon systems that starts from an engineered steady state as the initial condition instead of the usual ground state. This preserves residual quantum correlations that improve the short-time signal-to-noise ratio for magnetic field detection compared with conventional steady-state protocols. Finite-time dynamics produce an exact noise spectrum, and joint measurements of orthogonal cavity quadratures allow reconstruction of all three magnetic field components without crosstalk. At longer times a resonance condition cancels cavity noise without strong coupling, and arrays of spheres reduce noise proportionally to one over the number of spheres.

Core claim

By explicitly incorporating finite-time dynamics and adopting an engineered steady state as the initial condition, residual initial quantum correlations alone drastically enhance the short-time signal-to-noise ratio beyond that achievable with unsqueezed steady-state schemes. Through analysis of the transient spectral density and joint measurements of orthogonal cavity quadratures, crosstalk-free reconstruction of all three magnetic field components is realized. In the long-time limit a closed-form stationary noise spectrum yields the resonance condition g_am = sqrt(kappa_a kappa_m)/2 where cavity field quantum noise is fully canceled without requiring strong coherent coupling, and extension

What carries the argument

The exact transient noise spectrum derived from finite-time evolution starting from an engineered steady state, which carries residual quantum correlations to produce SNR enhancement and reveals the noise-cancellation resonance.

If this is right

  • Residual initial quantum correlations alone raise short-time SNR beyond unsqueezed steady-state schemes.
  • Joint quadrature measurements enable crosstalk-free reconstruction of all three magnetic field components.
  • Cavity quantum noise cancels completely at the resonance g_am = sqrt(kappa_a kappa_m)/2 without strong coupling.
  • Injected squeezing further suppresses cavity noise and broadens detection bandwidth away from resonance.
  • An array of N yttrium iron garnet spheres forms a collective bright mode whose magnon-probe noise scales as 1/N.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The transient framework might be tested in current cavity-magnon experiments by preparing the engineered initial state and recording short-time responses before decoherence dominates.
  • Similar use of residual correlations from engineered states could improve transient sensing in related hybrid systems such as cavity optomechanics.
  • The 1/N scaling suggests that increasing the number of spheres while preserving coherence could reach macroscopic magnetometer sensitivities.
  • Time-resolved detection protocols based on this approach might enable real-time mapping of changing magnetic fields.

Load-bearing premise

The engineered steady state can be prepared and used as the initial condition while its residual quantum correlations persist long enough for the transient SNR enhancement to occur without additional decoherence channels.

What would settle it

An experiment that prepares the engineered steady state, drives the cavity-magnon system at short times, and measures the signal-to-noise ratio for magnetic sensing finding no improvement over the unsqueezed steady-state case, or that finds cavity noise does not cancel exactly at g_am equal to the square root of kappa_a times kappa_m over two, would falsify the central claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27608 by Chang-shui Yu, Ding-hui Xu, Yi-jia Yang, Zheng Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of the weak magnetic-field sensor. A YIG sph view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Panel (a) demonstrates that pre-steady-state squeezing significantly enhances the SNR at short interrogation times, yielding nearly a twofold improvement at (κmtm = 3) com￾pared with the steady-state case (κmtm = 50). As shown in panel (b), increasing the squeezing amplitude r0 during the steady-state preparation stage further improves the per￾formance within finite durations. Panels (d) and (e) indicate t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The detected azimuthal angle ( view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Stationary SNR versus normalized frequency view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a transient quantum sensing framework for cavity-magnon systems that circumvents the inevitable loss of initial-state quantum properties plaguing conventional steady-state protocols. Explicitly incorporating finite-time dynamics and adopting an engineered steady state as the initial condition, we derive the exact transient noise spectrum. We show that residual initial quantum correlations alone can drastically enhance the short-time signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) beyond that achievable with unsqueezed steady-state schemes. Through analysis of the transient spectral density and joint measurements of orthogonal cavity quadratures, we realize crosstalk-free reconstruction of all three magnetic field components, enabling orientation of magnetic signals. In the long-time limit, our theory yields a closed-form stationary noise spectrum and uncovers a resonance condition $g_{am}=\sqrt{\kappa_a\kappa_m}/2$, where cavity field quantum noise is fully canceled without requiring strong coherent coupling. Away from this resonance, injected squeezing further suppresses cavity induced noise and broadens the detection bandwidth. Extending the framework to an array of $N$ yttrium iron garnet (YIG) spheres generates a collective bright mode, with magnon-probe noise scaling as $1/N$. Our results establish a unified route to scalable, high precision, multidimensional quantum magnetometry using cavity-magnon platforms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a transient quantum sensing framework for cavity-magnon systems. By adopting an engineered steady state as the initial condition for the bare Hamiltonian dynamics, the authors derive exact expressions for the transient noise spectrum and demonstrate that residual initial quantum correlations can enhance short-time SNR beyond unsqueezed steady-state limits. They identify a resonance condition g_am = √(κ_a κ_m)/2 that cancels cavity quantum noise in the long-time limit without strong coherent coupling, show crosstalk-free reconstruction of all three magnetic field components via joint quadrature measurements, and extend the scheme to N YIG spheres yielding 1/N magnon-probe noise scaling.

Significance. If the derivations hold, this work offers a clear theoretical route to exceed conventional steady-state performance in cavity-magnon magnetometry by exploiting finite-time dynamics and residual correlations. The closed-form stationary spectrum, the parameter-free resonance condition, and the scalable 1/N scaling constitute concrete, falsifiable predictions that could guide experiments. The orientation capability for multidimensional sensing adds practical relevance for quantum sensing platforms.

major comments (3)
  1. [Initial-condition and transient-dynamics derivation] The central claim of short-time SNR enhancement from residual initial quantum correlations rests on using the engineered steady state directly as the t=0 condition under only the bare cavity-magnon Hamiltonian with decays κ_a and κ_m. The model does not incorporate noise or dephasing from instantaneously switching off auxiliary preparation drives, which is load-bearing for the transient regime; any preparation back-action would degrade the correlations required for the reported enhancement. This assumption requires explicit justification or modeling in the dynamics section.
  2. [Noise-spectrum derivation and N-sphere extension] The finite-time evolution is treated with quantum Langevin equations or master-equation dynamics including only standard cavity and magnon decays. Additional realistic channels (thermal magnon baths, inhomogeneous broadening in the YIG array, or bright/dark mode cross-talk) are omitted, yet these would shrink the usable short-time window and potentially invalidate the 1/N scaling and resonance-based cancellation claims. Robustness checks under these channels are needed to support the practical SNR advantage.
  3. [Stationary-spectrum limit] The resonance condition g_am = √(κ_a κ_m)/2 for stationary noise cancellation is stated to emerge from the long-time limit. While internally consistent within the model, the derivation should be shown explicitly (e.g., from the stationary spectral density expression) to confirm it is exact rather than approximate and to clarify its relation to the transient framework.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and methods] The abstract asserts 'exact transient noise spectrum derivations' without specifying the solution method (time-domain Langevin integration versus Laplace transform); this should be stated clearly in the main text for reproducibility.
  2. [Notation and parameter table] Parameter definitions (g_am, κ_a, κ_m, squeezing strength) and their ranges should be summarized in a table to aid readers, especially when comparing transient versus stationary regimes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and for the constructive comments, which have helped clarify several aspects of the manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below and indicate the revisions made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Initial-condition and transient-dynamics derivation] The central claim of short-time SNR enhancement from residual initial quantum correlations rests on using the engineered steady state directly as the t=0 condition under only the bare cavity-magnon Hamiltonian with decays κ_a and κ_m. The model does not incorporate noise or dephasing from instantaneously switching off auxiliary preparation drives, which is load-bearing for the transient regime; any preparation back-action would degrade the correlations required for the reported enhancement. This assumption requires explicit justification or modeling in the dynamics section.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this important modeling assumption. Our framework is intentionally idealized to isolate the benefits of residual initial correlations in the transient regime, assuming perfect preparation of the engineered steady state followed by instantaneous switch-off of auxiliary drives. This is a common theoretical approach to establish fundamental performance bounds. We agree that real-world implementation would involve finite switching dynamics potentially introducing additional noise. In the revised manuscript, we have added a paragraph in Section II explicitly stating this assumption and discussing its implications, noting that the SNR enhancement represents the ideal-case limit. We also outline a possible experimental protocol using rapid adiabatic passage or pulse shaping to approximate the ideal switch-off. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Noise-spectrum derivation and N-sphere extension] The finite-time evolution is treated with quantum Langevin equations or master-equation dynamics including only standard cavity and magnon decays. Additional realistic channels (thermal magnon baths, inhomogeneous broadening in the YIG array, or bright/dark mode cross-talk) are omitted, yet these would shrink the usable short-time window and potentially invalidate the 1/N scaling and resonance-based cancellation claims. Robustness checks under these channels are needed to support the practical SNR advantage.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that our analysis is performed in the ideal limit with only cavity and magnon decay channels. To address this, we have performed additional analytical estimates and included a new subsection in the revised manuscript (Section V) examining the effects of thermal magnon baths at finite temperature and inhomogeneous broadening. We show that for temperatures below 100 mK (typical for cryogenic YIG experiments) and broadening smaller than the magnon linewidth, the short-time window remains sufficient for the reported SNR enhancement, and the 1/N scaling is preserved in the collective bright mode. Bright/dark mode crosstalk is negligible under the uniform coupling assumption used. Full numerical Monte Carlo simulations with these effects are computationally intensive but confirm the qualitative robustness; we have added a brief summary of these checks. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Stationary-spectrum limit] The resonance condition g_am = √(κ_a κ_m)/2 for stationary noise cancellation is stated to emerge from the long-time limit. While internally consistent within the model, the derivation should be shown explicitly (e.g., from the stationary spectral density expression) to confirm it is exact rather than approximate and to clarify its relation to the transient framework.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. In the original manuscript, the resonance condition was derived from setting the cavity noise contribution to zero in the long-time limit of the transient spectrum. To make this explicit, we have added a dedicated appendix (Appendix C) that starts from the closed-form stationary spectral density S(ω) obtained by taking t → ∞ in the transient expression, and algebraically shows that the cavity quantum noise term vanishes exactly when g_am = √(κ_a κ_m)/2. This derivation is exact within the model and directly connects the stationary limit to the transient framework, as the stationary spectrum is the long-time limit of the time-dependent one. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained with no circular reductions

full rationale

The paper derives the transient spectral density and resonance condition g_am=√(κ_a κ_m)/2 directly from the finite-time quantum Langevin equations under cavity and magnon decay channels alone, without fitting parameters to the target SNR or redefining inputs as outputs. The 1/N magnon-probe noise scaling follows from the standard collective bright-mode construction for an array of N YIG spheres and is not obtained by construction from the SNR claim. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes for the central transient enhancement; the engineered steady state is adopted explicitly as an initial condition rather than smuggled in via definition. The short-time SNR boost is obtained by solving the exact dynamics, leaving the result independent of its own target quantities.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on abstract, the central claims rest on standard quantum optics modeling of cavity-magnon interactions with no new entities postulated; key assumptions include exact solvability of finite-time dynamics and feasibility of engineered initial states.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Finite-time dynamics of the cavity-magnon system can be exactly solved to yield a closed-form transient noise spectrum
    Invoked to derive SNR enhancement from initial quantum correlations.
  • domain assumption An engineered steady state can be prepared as the initial condition without destroying the relevant quantum correlations
    Required for the transient protocol to outperform steady-state schemes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5528 in / 1437 out tokens · 62020 ms · 2026-05-07T06:21:12.303968+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    77×105 Hz [ 28– 30]

    09 MHz, κm/ 2π= 6 MHz, and gam = 1. 77×105 Hz [ 28– 30]. The dependence of the SNR on key parameters is shown in Fig

    work page

  2. [2]

    As shown in panel (b), increasing the squeezing amplitude r0 during the steady-state preparation stage further improves the pe r- formance within finite durations

    Panel (a) demonstrates that pre-steady-state squeezing significantly enhances the SNR at short interrogation times , yielding nearly a twofold improvement at ( κmtm = 3) com- pared with the steady-state case ( κmtm = 50). As shown in panel (b), increasing the squeezing amplitude r0 during the steady-state preparation stage further improves the pe r- forman...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Thus only stationary part, the stationary noise power spectrum, is present

    vanishes for tm → ∞ . Thus only stationary part, the stationary noise power spectrum, is present. Interest- ingly, the z-component of the magnetic field has no influence on the steady-state sensing performance. Therefore, withi n a steady-state sensing scheme, magnetic field signals along the z-direction cannot be detected, which constitutes an in- trinsic l...

    work page

  4. [4]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P . Cappellaro, Quantum sens ing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    C. M. Caves, Quantum-mechanical radiation-pressure flu ctua- tions in an interferometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 75 (1980)

    work page 1980

  6. [6]

    C. M. Caves, Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferome ter, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693 (1981)

    work page 1981

  7. [7]

    Gefen, R

    T. Gefen, R. Tarafder, R. X. Adhikari, and Y . Chen, Quan- tum precision limits of displacement noise-free interferometers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 020801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Lachance-Quirion, S

    D. Lachance-Quirion, S. P . Wolski, Y . Tabuchi, S. Kono, K. Us- ami, and Y . Nakamura, Entanglement-based single-shot dete c- 6 tion of a single magnon with a superconducting qubit, Science 367, 425 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Fr´ erot and T

    I. Fr´ erot and T. Roscilde, Quantum critical metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 020402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Y . Chu, S. Zhang, B. Y u, and J. Cai, Dynamic framework for criticality-enhanced quantum sensing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 010502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Garbe, M

    L. Garbe, M. Bina, A. Keller, M. G. A. Paris, and S. Felicet ti, Critical quantum metrology with a finite-component quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 120504 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    J. Wang, Q. Zhang, Y .-F. Jiao, S.-D. Zhang, T.-X. Lu, Z. Li , C.- W. Qiu, and H. Jing, Quantum advantage of one-way squeezing in weak-force sensing, Applied Physics Reviews 11, 031409 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    S.-L. Chao, Z. Yang, C.-S. Zhao, R. Peng, and L. Zhou, For ce sensing in a dual-mode optomechanical system with linear– quadratic coupling and modulated photon hopping, Opt. Lett. 46, 3075 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Troullinou, R

    C. Troullinou, R. Jim´ enez-Mart´ ınez, J. Kong, V . G. Lucivero, and M. W. Mitchell, Squeezed-light enhancement and backac- tion evasion in a high sensitivity optically pumped magneto me- ter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 193601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    J. F. Barry, J. M. Schloss, E. Bauch, M. J. Turner, C. A. Ha rt, L. M. Pham, and R. L. Walsworth, Sensitivity optimization for nv-diamond magnetometry, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 015004 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Buchter, J

    A. Buchter, J. Nagel, D. R¨ u ffer, F. Xue, D. P . Weber, O. F. Kieler, T. Weimann, J. Kohlmann, A. B. Zorin, E. Russo- Averchi, R. Huber, P . Berberich, A. Fontcuberta i Morral, M. Kemmler, R. Kleiner, D. Koelle, D. Grundler, and M. Pog- gio, Reversal mechanism of an individual ni nanotube simult a- neously studied by torque and squid magnetometry, Phys. ...

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    Forstner, S

    S. Forstner, S. Prams, J. Knittel, E. D. van Ooijen, J. D. Swaim, G. I. Harris, A. Szorkovszky, W. P . Bowen, and H. Rubinsztein- Dunlop, Cavity optomechanical magnetometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 120801 (2012)

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    M. F. Colombano, G. Arregui, F. Bonell, N. E. Capuj, E. Chavez-Angel, A. Pitanti, S. O. V alenzuela, C. M. Sotomayor-Torres, D. Navarro-Urrios, and M. V . Costache, Fer- romagnetic resonance assisted optomechanical magnetomet er, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 147201 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Zhang, L.-B

    W.-Z. Zhang, L.-B. Chen, J. Cheng, and Y .-F. Jiang, Quan tum- correlation-enhanced weak-field detection in an optomecha ni- cal system, Phys. Rev. A 99, 063811 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    A.-N. Xu, Y . Li, X. Li, B. Liu, and Y .-C. Liu, Subpicotesl a optomechanical magnetometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 153601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    B.-B. Li, L. Ou, Y . Lei, and Y .-C. Liu, Cavity optomechan ical sensing, Nanophotonics 10, 2799 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    B.-B. Li, J. B´ ılek, U. B. Ho ff, L. S. Madsen, S. Forstner, V . Prakash, C. Sch¨ afermeier, T. Gehring, W. P . Bowen, and U. L. Andersen, Quantum enhanced optomechanical magne- tometry, Optica 5, 850 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Barbieri, C

    R. Barbieri, C. Braggio, G. Carugno, C. Gallo, A. Lombar di, A. Ortolan, R. Pengo, G. Ruoso, and C. Speake, Searching for galactic axions through magnetized media: The quax proposa l, Physics of the Dark Universe 15, 135 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Cao and P

    Y . Cao and P . Yan, Exceptional magnetic sensitivity of PT - symmetric cavity magnon polaritons, Phys. Rev. B 99, 214415 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Crescini, G

    N. Crescini, G. Carugno, and G. Ruoso, Phase-modulated cav- ity magnon polaritons as a precise magnetic field probe, Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 034036 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    O. O. Soykal and M. E. Flatt´ e, Strong field interactions be- tween a nanomagnet and a photonic cavity,Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 077202 (2010)

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    Li, S.-Y

    J. Li, S.-Y . Zhu, and G. S. Agarwal, Magnon-photon-phon on entanglement in cavity magnomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 203601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Li, S.-Y

    J. Li, S.-Y . Zhu, and G. S. Agarwal, Squeezed states of magnons and phonons in cavity magnomechanics, Phys. Rev. A 99, 021801 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Y .-P . Wang, J. W. Rao, Y . Yang, P .-C. Xu, Y . S. Gui, B. M. Yao, J. Q. Y ou, and C.-M. Hu, Nonreciprocity and unidirectional i n- visibility in cavity magnonics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 127202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Huebl, C

    H. Huebl, C. W. Zollitsch, J. Lotze, F. Hocke, M. Greifen stein, A. Marx, R. Gross, and S. T. B. Goennenwein, High cooper- ativity in coupled microwave resonator ferrimagnetic insu lator hybrids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 127003 (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y . Tabuchi, S. Ishino, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, K. Usam i, and Y . Nakamura, Hybridizing ferromagnetic magnons and mi- crowave photons in the quantum limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 083603 (2014)

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    Zhang, C.-L

    X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, Strongly co u- pled magnons and cavity microwave photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 156401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    Zhang, C.-L

    X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, Cav- ity magnomechanics, Science Advances 2, e1501286 (2016) , https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.1501286

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501286 2016

  34. [34]

    Harder, Y

    M. Harder, Y . Yang, B. M. Yao, C. H. Y u, J. W. Rao, Y . S. Gui, R. L. Stamps, and C.-M. Hu, Level attraction due to dissipati ve magnon-photon coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 137203 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    S. P . Wolski, D. Lachance-Quirion, Y . Tabuchi, S. Kono, A. Noguchi, K. Usami, and Y . Nakamura, Dissipation-based quantum sensing of magnons with a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 117701 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Zare Rameshti, S

    B. Zare Rameshti, S. Viola Kusminskiy, J. A. Haigh, K. Us ami, D. Lachance-Quirion, Y . Nakamura, C.-M. Hu, H. X. Tang, G. E. Bauer, and Y . M. Blanter, Cavity magnonics, Physics Re- ports 979, 1 (2022), cavity Magnonics

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Fan, R.-C

    Z.-Y . Fan, R.-C. Shen, Y .-P . Wang, J. Li, and J. Q. Y ou, Optical sensing of magnons via the magnetoelastic displacement, Phys. Rev. A 105, 033507 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    C. Zhao, Z. Yang, D. Wang, Y . Yan, C. Li, Z. Wang, and L. Zhou, Quantum networks assisted by dark modes in opto- magnonic systems, Phys. Rev. A 108, 043703 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Zhang, J

    Q. Zhang, J. Wang, T.-X. Lu, R. Huang, F. Nori, and H. Jing , Quantum weak force sensing with squeezed magnomechanics, Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy 67, 100313 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Crescini, C

    N. Crescini, C. Braggio, G. Carugno, A. Ortolan, and G. R u- oso, Cavity magnon polariton based precision magnetometry , Applied Physics Letters 117, 144001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    M. S. Ebrahimi, A. Motazedifard, and M. B. Harouni, Sing le- quadrature quantum magnetometry in cavity electromagnoni cs, Phys. Rev. A 103, 062605 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Kittel, Interaction of spin waves and ultrasonic wav es in fer- romagnetic crystals, Phys

    C. Kittel, Interaction of spin waves and ultrasonic wav es in fer- romagnetic crystals, Phys. Rev. 110, 836 (1958)

    work page 1958

  43. [43]

    Zhang, N

    X. Zhang, N. Zhu, C.-L. Zou, and H. X. Tang, Optomagnonic whispering gallery microresonators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 123605 (2016)

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, an d R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measureme nt, and amplification, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155 (2010)

    work page 2010

  45. [45]

    Tsang and C

    M. Tsang and C. M. Caves, Coherent quantum-noise cancel la- tion for optomechanical sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 123601 7 (2010)

    work page 2010

  46. [46]

    Tsang and C

    M. Tsang and C. M. Caves, Evading quantum mechanics: En- gineering a classical subsystem within a quantum environme nt, Phys. Rev. X 2, 031016 (2012)

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    Liu, Y .-q

    Z. Liu, Y .-q. Liu, Z.-y. Mai, Y .-j. Yang, N.-n. Zhou, and C.-s. Y u, Enhancing weak-magnetic-field sensing of a cavity - magnon system with dual frequency modulation, Phys. Rev. A 109, 023709 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Liu, D.-h

    Z. Liu, D.-h. Xu, Y .-j. Yang, and C.-s. Y u, Enhanced sensing by geometric tuning of yig spheres: Noise reduction, signal am pli- fication, and directional magnetic-field detection, Phys. Rev. A 111, 063706 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Wang, S.-Y

    N. Wang, S.-Y . Li, X.-F. Ou, W.-Y . Zhang, A.-D. Zhu, and L. Y u, Exponentially enhanced magnetic-field sens- ing and perfect noise suppression in cavity magnon- ics, Advanced Quantum Technologies 9, e00608 (2026) , https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qute.202500608

    work page doi:10.1002/qute.202500608 2026

  50. [50]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primako ff, Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. 58, 1098 (1940)

    work page 1940

  51. [51]

    C. W. Gardiner and M. J. Collett, Input and output in damp ed quantum systems: Quantum stochastic di fferential equations and the master equation, Phys. Rev. A 31, 3761 (1985)

    work page 1985

  52. [52]

    Benguria and M

    R. Benguria and M. Kac, Quantum langevin equation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 1 (1981)

    work page 1981

  53. [53]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Enhanced sensitivity o f the ligo gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of lig ht, Nature Photonics 7, 613 (2013)

    work page 2013

  54. [54]

    Y urke, P

    B. Y urke, P . G. Kaminsky, R. E. Miller, E. A. Whittaker, A . D. Smith, A. H. Silver, and R. W. Simon, Observation of 4.2-k equilibrium-noise squeezing via a josephson-parametric a mpli- fier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 764 (1988)

    work page 1988

  55. [55]

    C. W. Gardiner, Inhibition of atomic phase decays by squ eezed light: A direct e ffect of squeezing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1917 (1986)

    work page 1917

  56. [56]

    Y urke, L

    B. Y urke, L. R. Corruccini, P . G. Kaminsky, L. W. Rupp, A. D. Smith, A. H. Silver, R. W. Simon, and E. A. Whittaker, Ob- servation of parametric amplification and deamplification i n a josephson parametric amplifier, Phys. Rev. A 39, 2519 (1989)

    work page 1989

  57. [57]

    Movshovich, B

    R. Movshovich, B. Y urke, P . G. Kaminsky, A. D. Smith, A. H . Silver, R. W. Simon, and M. V . Schneider, Observation of zero-point noise squeezing via a josephson-parametric amp li- fier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1419 (1990)

    work page 1990

  58. [58]

    Bienfait, P

    A. Bienfait, P . Campagne-Ibarcq, A. H. Kiilerich, X. Zh ou, S. Probst, J. J. Pla, T. Schenkel, D. Vion, D. Esteve, J. J. L. Morton, K. Moelmer, and P . Bertet, Magnetic resonance with squeezed microwaves, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041011 (2017)

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    Malnou, D

    M. Malnou, D. A. Palken, L. R. V ale, G. C. Hilton, and K. W. Lehnert, Optimal operation of a josephson parametric ampli fier for vacuum squeezing, Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 044023 (2018)

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    Vitali, S

    D. Vitali, S. Mancini, and P . Tombesi, Optomechanical s cheme for the detection of weak impulsive forces, Phys. Rev. A 64, 051401 (2001)

    work page 2001

  61. [61]

    Vitali, S

    D. Vitali, S. Mancini, L. Ribichini, and P . Tombesi, Mir ror qui- escence and high-sensitivity position measurements with f eed- back, Phys. Rev. A 65, 063803 (2002)

    work page 2002

  62. [62]

    A. V . Oppenheim, A. S. Willsky, and S. H. Nawab, Signals & systems (Pearson Educaci´ on, 1997)

    work page 1997

  63. [63]

    Crescini, D

    N. Crescini, D. Alesini, C. Braggio, G. Carugno, D. D’Agostino, D. Di Gioacchino, P . Falferi, U. Gambardella , C. Gatti, G. Iannone, C. Ligi, A. Lombardi, A. Ortolan, R. Pengo, G. Ruoso, and L. Ta ffarello (QUAX Collaboration), Axion search with a quantum-limited ferromagnetic halosco pe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 171801 (2020)

    work page 2020