pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.27626 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · 📡 eess.SP · cs.IT· math.IT

Recognition: unknown

Sensing-Assisted Channel Estimation for Flexible-Antenna Systems: A Unified Framework

Jun Zhang, Khaled B. Letaief, Ruoxiao Cao, Shenghui Song, Wentao Yu, Yi Gong, Zixin Wang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 07:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP cs.ITmath.IT
keywords flexible-antenna systemschannel estimationsensing-assisteddirection of arrival estimationNewton-MUSICpilot overhead6G communicationsarray signal processing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Flexible-antenna systems acquire full channel state information by resolving directions of arrival from uplink data symbols and calibrating path gains with minimal pilots.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes a unified sensing-assisted channel estimation framework for flexible-antenna systems that cuts pilot overhead. It reduces the problem to first resolving dominant directions of arrival from uplink data symbols alone by using the known spatial geometry of possible antenna positions. No separate sensing pilots are needed for this step. Then only a few calibration pilots are used to determine the path gains for those directions. Two variants of Newton-MUSIC are introduced to handle different environments, and the direction search is solved as a continuous optimization instead of a grid search.

Core claim

The full CSI reconstruction in flexible-antenna systems reduces to a consistent two-stage process. Dominant DOAs are resolved from the uplink data symbols by exploiting the spatial geometry, requiring no dedicated sensing pilot. The associated path gains are then calibrated using a minimal number of calibration pilots. This is achieved by Newton-MUSIC algorithms that turn the spatial spectrum search into a continuous optimization problem solved by parallel Newton refinements.

What carries the argument

The unified two-stage sensing-assisted channel estimation pipeline that resolves dominant DOAs from uplink data symbols exploiting spatial geometry and calibrates path gains with minimal pilots, using SOC-Newton-MUSIC for LOS and FOC-Newton-MUSIC for NLOS environments.

If this is right

  • In LOS-dominant environments, SOC-Newton-MUSIC provides low-complexity DOA sensing from data symbols.
  • In NLOS environments with coherent multipath, FOC-Newton-MUSIC restores source identifiability and expands spatial DOFs via continuous difference co-array even when sources exceed RF chains.
  • The spatial spectrum search is reformulated as a continuous optimization problem, allowing parallelized Newton refinements instead of exhaustive grid searches.
  • Pilot overhead no longer scales with the number of candidate antenna locations but with the number of dominant paths.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach could enable real-time channel estimation in mobile scenarios by updating DOA estimates from ongoing data transmissions.
  • The framework might combine with machine learning to predict path gains and further minimize calibration pilots.
  • Similar sensing-assisted techniques could apply to other reconfigurable antenna architectures beyond flexible-antenna systems.
  • The continuous Newton optimization may improve robustness in time-varying channels compared to traditional methods.

Load-bearing premise

Dominant directions of arrival can be reliably extracted from uplink data symbols alone by exploiting spatial geometry without dedicated sensing pilots and without the data symbols being too correlated or too weak to support the Newton-MUSIC steps.

What would settle it

A test case with highly correlated or low-power uplink data symbols where the Newton-MUSIC algorithm fails to accurately resolve the true DOAs from the data alone, resulting in poor channel reconstruction unless dedicated sensing pilots are added.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27626 by Jun Zhang, Khaled B. Letaief, Ruoxiao Cao, Shenghui Song, Wentao Yu, Yi Gong, Zixin Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Two examples of flexible-antenna systems, namely MIMO systems view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Flexible-antenna architecture example with view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A comparison of different configurations for a flexible-antenna system view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of the proposed sensing-assisted channel estimation with view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Normalized spatial spectrum of classical SOC-MUSIC for a view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The virtual array of different configurations in Fig. 3, where view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: RMSE of the DOA sensing for different configurations. view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Channel estimation performance for for different configurations. view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: RMSE of the DOA sensing versus SNR for random sources with view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Flexible-antenna systems, which use a small number of radio frequency (RF) chains to dynamically access a large set of candidate antenna locations, have emerged as a hardware-efficient architecture for 6G networks. Acquiring accurate channel state information (CSI) is critical for these systems, but it typically incurs a prohibitive pilot overhead that scales with the massive number of candidate locations. To address this bottleneck, we propose a unified sensing-assisted channel estimation framework tailored for flexible-antenna systems. It reduces the full CSI reconstruction problem to a consistent two-stage process: it first resolves the dominant DOAs from the uplink data symbols by exploiting the spatial geometry, requiring no dedicated sensing pilot, and then calibrates the associated path gains using a minimal number of calibration pilots. Building on this pipeline, we develop two Newton-MUSIC algorithms tailored to different propagation environments. For line-of-sight (LOS)-dominant environments with uncorrelated sources, we propose SOC-Newton-MUSIC, which leverages second-order covariance (SOC) for low-complexity DOA sensing. For non-line-of-sight (NLOS) environments with coherent multipath, where the number of sources may exceed the number of activated RF chains, we propose FOC-Newton-MUSIC, which exploits fourth-order cumulants (FOC) to restore source identifiability and structurally expand the available spatial degrees of freedom (DOFs) through a continuous difference co-array. In both cases, by reformulating the spatial spectrum search as a continuous optimization problem, we replace exhaustive dense grid searches with parallelized Newton refinements.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a unified sensing-assisted channel estimation framework for flexible-antenna systems that reduces full CSI reconstruction to a two-stage process: first resolving dominant DOAs from uplink data symbols by exploiting spatial geometry (no dedicated sensing pilots), then calibrating path gains with minimal calibration pilots. It develops SOC-Newton-MUSIC for LOS-dominant uncorrelated sources using second-order covariance and FOC-Newton-MUSIC for NLOS coherent multipath using fourth-order cumulants to restore identifiability and expand DOFs via a continuous difference co-array. Both reformulate the spatial spectrum search as continuous optimization solved by parallelized Newton refinements instead of grid searches.

Significance. If validated, the framework could meaningfully reduce pilot overhead in hardware-efficient flexible-antenna architectures for 6G by leveraging uplink data for DOA sensing. The Newton-based continuous optimization and the FOC approach for coherent sources are potentially useful extensions of subspace methods. The unified two-stage pipeline across propagation environments is a clear organizational strength. Significance is limited by the need for explicit validation of the core assumptions on snapshot stationarity and activation patterns.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Proposed Framework] Abstract and proposed pipeline: The central claim that dominant DOAs can be resolved from uplink data symbols alone (without dedicated sensing pilots) relies on forming SOC or FOC matrices from the received vectors y(t). This construction assumes a fixed array response vector a(θ) across snapshots. In flexible-antenna systems the activated positions can change between symbols, making each snapshot have a distinct steering vector; the manuscript provides no derivation or modification of Newton-MUSIC for a time-varying manifold. This assumption is load-bearing for the 'no dedicated sensing pilot' reduction.
  2. [FOC-Newton-MUSIC] FOC-Newton-MUSIC description: The claim that fourth-order cumulants 'structurally expand the available spatial degrees of freedom through a continuous difference co-array' is not accompanied by an explicit construction of the co-array when only a small number of RF chains are active. If positions are held fixed during the data phase the effective aperture is limited to the span of the active elements; if they vary, the standard co-array algebra does not apply directly. Either case undermines the identifiability restoration argument for NLOS scenarios where the number of sources may exceed the number of active chains.
minor comments (2)
  1. [System Model] Clarify the exact received-signal model (including dependence on the time-varying activation pattern) before the SOC/FOC definitions; the current high-level description leaves the snapshot stationarity assumption implicit.
  2. [Algorithm Description] Add a brief statement on the convergence conditions or initialization strategy for the Newton refinements, as the abstract only states that they replace grid search.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for the thorough review and constructive criticism of our manuscript. The comments have helped us identify areas where the assumptions and technical details need to be more explicitly stated. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the corresponding revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Proposed Framework] Abstract and proposed pipeline: The central claim that dominant DOAs can be resolved from uplink data symbols alone (without dedicated sensing pilots) relies on forming SOC or FOC matrices from the received vectors y(t). This construction assumes a fixed array response vector a(θ) across snapshots. In flexible-antenna systems the activated positions can change between symbols, making each snapshot have a distinct steering vector; the manuscript provides no derivation or modification of Newton-MUSIC for a time-varying manifold. This assumption is load-bearing for the 'no dedicated sensing pilot' reduction.

    Authors: We thank the referee for pointing out this critical aspect of the framework. In our proposed sensing-assisted channel estimation approach, the flexible-antenna system selects and fixes the activation pattern of the RF chains for the duration of the uplink data transmission block used for DOA sensing. This fixed activation ensures that the steering vector a(θ) is identical for all snapshots t, enabling the direct application of standard SOC or FOC matrix constructions and the subsequent Newton-MUSIC algorithms without modification for time-varying manifolds. This assumption aligns with practical system designs where antenna positions are adjusted at the start of a coherence interval and remain static during data reception. The 'exploiting the spatial geometry' refers to using the known fixed positions to form the manifold. We will revise the abstract, Section II (System Model), and the framework description in Section III to explicitly state and justify this fixed-activation assumption during the sensing phase. This clarification supports the reduction to no dedicated sensing pilots. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [FOC-Newton-MUSIC] FOC-Newton-MUSIC description: The claim that fourth-order cumulants 'structurally expand the available spatial degrees of freedom through a continuous difference co-array' is not accompanied by an explicit construction of the co-array when only a small number of RF chains are active. If positions are held fixed during the data phase the effective aperture is limited to the span of the active elements; if they vary, the standard co-array algebra does not apply directly. Either case undermines the identifiability restoration argument for NLOS scenarios where the number of sources may exceed the number of active chains.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit construction of the continuous difference co-array would strengthen the FOC-Newton-MUSIC section. Under the fixed activation pattern during the data phase, the active antenna positions define a sparse array geometry. The difference co-array is then formed by taking all pairwise position differences, resulting in a virtual array with up to K(K-1)+1 distinct virtual sensors for K active elements. This virtual expansion, combined with the fourth-order cumulants that decorrelate the coherent sources, restores identifiability when the number of sources exceeds K. The 'continuous' qualifier pertains to the optimization of the spatial spectrum over continuous DOA parameters using Newton iterations, rather than a discretized grid, while the co-array itself is determined by the fixed positions. We will add a new subsection or appendix detailing the co-array construction, including mathematical expressions for the virtual array positions and the resulting DOF expansion for NLOS coherent multipath scenarios. This will directly address the identifiability argument. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation chain is self-contained and independent of its outputs

full rationale

The paper's central reduction of CSI reconstruction to a two-stage pipeline (DOA resolution from uplink data symbols via spatial geometry, followed by separate path-gain calibration) is presented as a direct algorithmic procedure rather than a self-referential fit or definition. SOC-Newton-MUSIC and FOC-Newton-MUSIC are described as extensions of standard second- and fourth-order subspace methods, with the Newton refinement reformulating the spectrum search as a continuous optimization; neither stage is defined in terms of the final CSI values or path gains it produces. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, no parameters are fitted to a subset and then relabeled as predictions of related quantities, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The derivation therefore remains externally falsifiable against standard array-processing benchmarks and does not reduce to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; the framework rests on standard array-signal-processing assumptions rather than new invented entities. No free parameters are explicitly introduced in the abstract, but the method implicitly depends on knowing or estimating the number of sources and on the validity of far-field planar-wave assumptions.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Uplink data symbols contain sufficient spatial information to resolve dominant DOAs via second- or fourth-order statistics
    Invoked in the first stage of the two-stage process.
  • domain assumption The number of sources and their correlation properties allow the continuous difference co-array to expand the effective degrees of freedom
    Required for the FOC-Newton-MUSIC identifiability claim in NLOS.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5604 in / 1629 out tokens · 74027 ms · 2026-05-07T07:26:57.728306+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The roadmap to 6G: AI empowered wireless networks,

    K. B. Letaief, W. Chen, Y . Shi, J. Zhang, and Y .-J. A. Zhang, “The roadmap to 6G: AI empowered wireless networks,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 84–90, Aug. 2019

    2019

  2. [2]

    A vision of 6G wireless systems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research problems,

    W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Chen, “A vision of 6G wireless systems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research problems,”IEEE Netw., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 134–142, May/Jun. 2019

    2019

  3. [3]

    Flexible-antenna systems: A pinching-antenna perspective,

    Z. Ding, R. Schober, and H. V . Poor, “Flexible-antenna systems: A pinching-antenna perspective,”IEEE Trans. Commun., Oct. 2025

    2025

  4. [4]

    MIMO systems with antenna selection,

    A. F. Molisch and M. Z. Win, “MIMO systems with antenna selection,” IEEE Microwave Mag., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 46–56, Mar. 2004

    2004

  5. [5]

    Fluid antenna systems,

    K.-K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Fluid antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950–1962, Mar. 2020

    1950

  6. [6]

    Movable antennas for wireless commu- nication: Opportunities and challenges,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Movable antennas for wireless commu- nication: Opportunities and challenges,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 114–120, Oct 2023

    2023

  7. [7]

    Pinching- antenna systems: Architecture designs, opportunities, and outlook,

    Y . Liu, Z. Wang, X. Mu, C. Ouyang, X. Xu, and Z. Ding, “Pinching- antenna systems: Architecture designs, opportunities, and outlook,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 190–196, Sept. 2025

    2025

  8. [8]

    Movable-antenna enhanced multiuser communication via antenna position optimization,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, B. Ning, and R. Zhang, “Movable-antenna enhanced multiuser communication via antenna position optimization,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 7214–7229, Dec. 2023

    2023

  9. [9]

    Channel estimation and reconstruction in fluid antenna system: Oversampling is essential,

    W. K. New, K.-K. Wong, H. Xu, F. R. Ghadi, R. Murch, and C.-B. Chae, “Channel estimation and reconstruction in fluid antenna system: Oversampling is essential,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 309–322, Nov. 2024

    2024

  10. [10]

    Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory,

    S. M. Kay, “Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory,”Technometrics, vol. 37, p. 465, 1993

    1993

  11. [11]

    Compressed channel sensing: A new approach to estimating sparse multipath chan- nels,

    W. U. Bajwa, J. Haupt, A. M. Sayeed, and R. Nowak, “Compressed channel sensing: A new approach to estimating sparse multipath chan- nels,”Proc. IEEE, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 1058–1076, Apr. 2010

    2010

  12. [12]

    Compressed sensing based channel estimation for movable antenna communications,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “Compressed sensing based channel estimation for movable antenna communications,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 2747–2751, Aug. 2023

    2023

  13. [13]

    Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual-functional wire- less networks for 6G and beyond,

    F. Liu, Y . Cui, C. Masouros, J. Xu, T. X. Han, Y . C. Eldar, and S. Buzzi, “Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual-functional wire- less networks for 6G and beyond,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1728–1767, Mar. 2022

    2022

  14. [14]

    Channel estimation and hybrid precoding for millimeter wave cellular systems,

    A. Alkhateeb, O. El Ayach, G. Leus, and R. W. Heath, “Channel estimation and hybrid precoding for millimeter wave cellular systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 831–846, Jul. 2014

    2014

  15. [15]

    Spatially sparse precoding in millimeter wave MIMO systems,

    O. El Ayach, S. Rajagopal, S. Abu-Surra, Z. Pi, and R. W. Heath, “Spatially sparse precoding in millimeter wave MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1499–1513, Jan. 2014

    2014

  16. [16]

    Newtonized near-field channel estimation for ultra-massive MIMO systems,

    R. Cao, W. Yu, H. He, X. Yu, S. Song, J. Zhang, Y . Gong, and K. B. Letaief, “Newtonized near-field channel estimation for ultra-massive MIMO systems,” inProc. IEEE Wireless Commun. Netw. Conf. (WCNC), Dubai, UAE, Apr. 2024, pp. 1–6

    2024

  17. [17]

    An adaptive and robust deep learning framework for THz ultra-massive MIMO channel estimation,

    W. Yu, Y . Shen, H. He, X. Yu, S. Song, J. Zhang, and K. B. Letaief, “An adaptive and robust deep learning framework for THz ultra-massive MIMO channel estimation,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 761–776, Jun. 2023

    2023

  18. [18]

    Joint channel estimation and cooperative localization for near-field ultra-massive MIMO,

    R. Cao, H. He, X. Yu, S. Song, K. Huang, J. Zhang, Y . Gong, and K. B. Letaief, “Joint channel estimation and cooperative localization for near-field ultra-massive MIMO,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.13683, Dec. 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Sensing for free: Learn to localize more sources than antennas without pilots,

    W. Yu, K. B. Letaief, and L. Zheng, “Sensing for free: Learn to localize more sources than antennas without pilots,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 44, pp. 3285–3301, Jan. 2026

    2026

  20. [20]

    Efficient channel estimation for millimeter wave and terahertz systems enabled by integrated super-resolution sensing and communication,

    J. Xu, H. Wang, Y . Zeng, X. Xu, Q. Wu, F. Yang, Y . Chen, and A. Jamalipour, “Efficient channel estimation for millimeter wave and terahertz systems enabled by integrated super-resolution sensing and communication,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.20607, Jul. 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Bistatic target detection by ex- ploiting both deterministic pilots and unknown random data payloads,

    L. Xie, F. Liu, S. Song, and S. Jin, “Bistatic target detection by exploiting both deterministic pilots and unknown random data payloads,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18728, Aug. 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Adaptive matched filtering for sensing with communication signals in cluttered environments,

    L. Xie, H. He, Y . Xiong, F. Liu, and S. Jin, “Adaptive matched filtering for sensing with communication signals in cluttered environments,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.08157, Dec. 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    OFDM-based positioning with unknown data payloads: Bounds and applications to LEO PNT,

    A. M. Graff and T. E. Humphreys, “OFDM-based positioning with unknown data payloads: Bounds and applications to LEO PNT,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 7505–7519, Nov. 2025

    2025

  24. [24]

    Two decades of array signal processing research: the parametric approach,

    H. Krim and M. Viberg, “Two decades of array signal processing research: the parametric approach,”IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 67–94, Jul. 1996

    1996

  25. [25]

    Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation,

    R. Schmidt, “Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 276–280, Mar. 1986

    1986

  26. [26]

    ESPRIT-estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance techniques,

    R. Roy and T. Kailath, “ESPRIT-estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance techniques,”IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 984–995, Jul. 1989

    1989

  27. [27]

    Forward/backward spatial smoothing techniques for coherent signal identification,

    S. U. Pillai and B. H. Kwon, “Forward/backward spatial smoothing techniques for coherent signal identification,”IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 8–15, Jan. 1989

    1989

  28. [28]

    Sparse MIMO for ISAC: New opportunities and challenges,

    X. Li, H. Min, Y . Zeng, S. Jin, L. Dai, Y . Yuan, and R. Zhang, “Sparse MIMO for ISAC: New opportunities and challenges,”IEEE Wireless Commun., Mar. 2025

    2025

  29. [29]

    Study of ambiguities of linear arrays,

    C. Proukakis and A. Manikas, “Study of ambiguities of linear arrays,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. (ICASSP), vol. 4, Adelaide, SA, Australia, Apr. 1994, pp. IV–549

    1994

  30. [30]

    Off-grid direction of arrival estimation using sparse bayesian inference,

    Z. Yang, L. Xie, and C. Zhang, “Off-grid direction of arrival estimation using sparse bayesian inference,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 38–43, Oct. 2012

    2012

  31. [31]

    On the virtual array concept for higher order array processing,

    P. Chevalier, L. Albera, A. Ferréol, and P. Comon, “On the virtual array concept for higher order array processing,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1254–1271, Apr. 2005

    2005

  32. [32]

    Tutorial on higher-order statistics (spectra) in signal pro- cessing and system theory: Theoretical results and some applications,

    J. M. Mendel, “Tutorial on higher-order statistics (spectra) in signal pro- cessing and system theory: Theoretical results and some applications,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 278–305, Mar. 1991

    1991

  33. [33]

    Minimum-redundancy linear arrays,

    A. Moffet, “Minimum-redundancy linear arrays,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 172–175, Mar. 1968

    1968

  34. [34]

    An overview of signal processing techniques for millimeter wave MIMO systems,

    R. W. Heath, N. Gonzalez-Prelcic, S. Rangan, W. Roh, and A. M. Sayeed, “An overview of signal processing techniques for millimeter wave MIMO systems,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 436–453, Feb. 2016

    2016

  35. [35]

    Wireless communications and applications above 100 GHz: Opportunities and challenges for 6G and beyond,

    T. S. Rappaport, Y . Xing, O. Kanhere, S. Ju, A. Madanayake, S. Mandal, A. Alkhateeb, and G. C. Trichopoulos, “Wireless communications and applications above 100 GHz: Opportunities and challenges for 6G and beyond,”IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 78 729–78 757, Jun. 2019

    2019

  36. [36]

    Massive machine-type commu- nications in 5G: Physical and MAC-layer solutions,

    C. Bockelmann, N. Pratas, H. Nikopour, K. Au, T. Svensson, C. Ste- fanovic, P. Popovski, and A. Dekorsy, “Massive machine-type commu- nications in 5G: Physical and MAC-layer solutions,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 59–65, Sept. 2016

    2016

  37. [37]

    Direction finding algorithms based on high-order statistics,

    B. Porat and B. Friedlander, “Direction finding algorithms based on high-order statistics,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 2016–2024, Sep. 1991

    2016

  38. [38]

    Under-determined DOA estimation: A method based on higher-order statistics and non- uniform arrays,

    W. Peng, P. Li, X. Wu, K. Luo, G. Zheng, and D. Li, “Under-determined DOA estimation: A method based on higher-order statistics and non- uniform arrays,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 15 903–15 914, Nov. 2024

    2024

  39. [39]

    Hierarchical digital modulation classi- fication using cumulants,

    A. Swami and B. M. Sadler, “Hierarchical digital modulation classi- fication using cumulants,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 416–429, Mar. 2002

    2002

  40. [40]

    On channel estimation in OFDM systems,

    J.-J. Van De Beek, O. Edfors, M. Sandell, S. K. Wilson, and P. O. Börjesson, “On channel estimation in OFDM systems,” inProc. IEEE 45th Veh. Technol. Conf. (VTC), Chicago, IL, United States, Jul. 1995, pp. 815–819

    1995