pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.27857 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Magnetic excitation spectrum and hierarchy of magnetic interactions in ErFeO3

Dnyaneshwar R. Bhosale , Piotr Fabrykiewicz , Devashibhai Adroja , Martin Meven , Astrid Schneidewind , Michal Stekiel This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 06:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ErFeO3neutron spectroscopyspin wavescrystal electric fieldmagnetic exchangeorthoferriteFe3+ sublatticeEr3+ ions
0
0 comments X

The pith

In ErFeO3, Fe spin-wave dispersions and intensities are reproduced by linear spin wave theory while Er crystal-field levels disperse from Er-Er coupling and split from Er-Fe interactions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper maps the full magnetic excitation spectrum of ErFeO3 with time-of-flight neutron spectroscopy, separating strongly dispersive Fe3+ spin waves (9-65 meV) from Er3+ crystal-electric-field excitations below 36 meV. Linear spin wave theory accounts for the Fe spectrum and supplies the main Fe-Fe exchange parameters. Low-energy data further show that the Er levels disperse because of direct Er-Er exchange and that their Kramers degeneracy is lifted by Er-Fe coupling. These findings lay out a quantitative hierarchy of interaction scales in the orthoferrite, from dominant Fe-Fe exchange down to weaker rare-earth couplings. A reader cares because the same hierarchy governs spin reorientation and low-temperature order in the whole family of rare-earth orthoferrites.

Core claim

Time-of-flight neutron spectroscopy shows that the excitation spectrum of ErFeO3 consists of Fe3+ spin waves spanning approximately 9-65 meV whose dispersions and spectral weights are reproduced by linear spin wave theory, allowing extraction of the principal Fe-Fe exchange parameters, together with Er3+ crystal-electric-field excitations below 36 meV. The dispersion of the Kramers-degenerate CEF levels arises from Er-Er exchange coupling, while the lifting of degeneracy is produced by interactions between the Er3+ and Fe3+ sublattices. Inclusion of dipolar and antisymmetric exchange terms further constrains the low-temperature magnetic ground state.

What carries the argument

Linear spin wave theory for the Fe3+ sublattice combined with an exchange Hamiltonian that generates both the dispersion (Er-Er) and the splitting (Er-Fe) of Er3+ crystal-electric-field levels.

If this is right

  • The dominant Fe-Fe exchange constants are fixed by fitting the measured spin-wave branches.
  • Er-Er exchange is identified as the mechanism producing dispersion of the low-energy Er crystal-field excitations.
  • Er-Fe coupling accounts for the observed lifting of Kramers degeneracy in the Er levels.
  • Dipolar and antisymmetric exchange contributions determine the low-temperature spin arrangement.
  • The measured spectrum establishes the characteristic hierarchy of interaction strengths in orthoferrites.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same neutron-scattering approach can be applied to other RFeO3 members to map how the interaction hierarchy evolves with rare-earth ion size.
  • The extracted Fe-Fe and Er-Fe parameters supply direct input for microscopic models of the spin-reorientation transitions known to occur in ErFeO3.
  • Small residuals between data and linear spin-wave fits at the highest energies could be tested for signatures of biquadratic or other higher-order Fe-Fe terms.

Load-bearing premise

Linear spin wave theory remains accurate for the Fe3+ excitations across the full measured energy range without substantial higher-order corrections or extra interaction terms.

What would settle it

A high-resolution measurement in which the observed Fe spin-wave dispersions or intensities deviate markedly from the linear spin-wave calculation, or in which the Er CEF splitting cannot be reproduced once only Er-Fe coupling is added.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27857 by Astrid Schneidewind, Devashibhai Adroja, Dnyaneshwar R. Bhosale, Martin Meven, Michal Stekiel, Piotr Fabrykiewicz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Overview of magnetic exchange interactions in view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Overview of powder-averaged inelastic neutron scat view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. High-energy spectral weight of ErFeO view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Spin wave dispersion relations of ErFeO view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Intermediate energy magnetic excitations in ErFeO view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Dispersion and splitting of crystal electric field ex view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report a comprehensive investigation of the excitation spectrum of ErFeO$_3$ orthoferrite by means of time-of-flight neutron spectroscopy. The spectrum consists of two distinct components: strongly dispersive spin wave excitations of the Fe$^{3+}$ sublattice spanning $\approx$~9 - 65 meV, and crystal electric field (CEF) excitations of Er$^{3+}$ ions below 36 meV. The observed spin wave dispersions and spectral weight are well captured within linear spin wave theory, enabling extraction of the key Fe-Fe exchange parameters. Low-energy incident neutrons with their enhanced energy resolution, further revealed the dispersive character and splitting of Kramers-degenerate CEF levels. We show that the dispersion is caused by the exchange coupling between Er$^{3+}$ ions, while the degeneracy is lifted by interactions between the Er$^{3+}$ and Fe$^{3+}$ sublattices. We further explore the influence of dipolar and antisymmetric exchange interactions with the focus on the magnetic ground state of ErFeO$_3$, with particular attention to the low-temperature spin arrangement. Taken together, our results provide a detailed account of the spin dynamics in ErFeO$_3$ and reveal a hierarchy of interactions scales characteristic for orthoferrites.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a neutron scattering study of the magnetic excitations in ErFeO3. It identifies dispersive spin waves from the Fe3+ sublattice (9-65 meV) fitted by linear spin wave theory to extract Fe-Fe exchange interactions, and crystal field excitations from Er3+ ions (<36 meV) whose dispersion is attributed to Er-Er coupling and splitting to Er-Fe interactions. The paper also discusses the role of dipolar and antisymmetric exchanges in the low-temperature spin arrangement, aiming to establish the hierarchy of magnetic interactions in this orthoferrite.

Significance. This work contributes to the understanding of complex magnetic dynamics in rare-earth orthoferrites by providing experimental data on both spin-wave and CEF excitations and linking them to specific interactions. If the LSWT fits are validated against the full coupled system, the extracted parameters and the proposed hierarchy would be useful for modeling similar compounds and for applications in spintronics or magnonics where orthoferrites are relevant. The comprehensive use of TOF neutron spectroscopy across energy scales is a positive aspect.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4 (Spin-wave analysis)] The extraction of Fe-Fe exchange parameters from fitting the Fe3+ spin-wave dispersions assumes an isolated Fe sublattice Hamiltonian. However, since Er-Fe interactions are invoked to lift the CEF degeneracy and the energy bands overlap in the 9-36 meV range, the manuscript should demonstrate that these interactions do not significantly renormalize the Fe magnon energies in this region. A calculation including the full Fe-Er Hamiltonian or an estimate of the hybridization shift would be required to support the independence of the fit.
  2. [Abstract and §5 (Discussion)] The abstract states that the dispersions and spectral weight are 'well captured' by LSWT, but no quantitative measures of fit quality (such as chi-squared per degree of freedom, parameter uncertainties, or comparison of calculated vs. measured intensities) are provided. This makes it difficult to evaluate how uniquely the hierarchy is determined and whether alternative models could fit equally well.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Ensure that all figures have clear labels for energy scales and momentum directions, and that error bars are visible on data points.
  2. [Notation] The definition of the exchange parameters (J1, J2 etc.) should be explicitly tied to the crystal structure in the text or a table for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We appreciate the positive comments on the significance of the work and the comprehensive use of TOF neutron spectroscopy. Below, we address each major comment point by point and describe the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4 (Spin-wave analysis)] The extraction of Fe-Fe exchange parameters from fitting the Fe3+ spin-wave dispersions assumes an isolated Fe sublattice Hamiltonian. However, since Er-Fe interactions are invoked to lift the CEF degeneracy and the energy bands overlap in the 9-36 meV range, the manuscript should demonstrate that these interactions do not significantly renormalize the Fe magnon energies in this region. A calculation including the full Fe-Er Hamiltonian or an estimate of the hybridization shift would be required to support the independence of the fit.

    Authors: We agree that explicitly addressing the potential renormalization of the Fe magnon energies by Er-Fe coupling would strengthen the justification for the isolated-sublattice LSWT fit. In the revised manuscript we will add a perturbative estimate of the hybridization shift in §4. Treating the Er-Fe interaction as a perturbation on the Fe spin-wave Hamiltonian, the leading correction to the magnon energy is of order J_{Er-Fe}^2 / ΔE, where ΔE is the local energy separation between the Fe dispersion and the Er CEF levels. Given the hierarchy of scales already established in the work (Fe-Fe exchanges of order 10 meV versus Er-Fe couplings of order 1 meV inferred from the CEF splitting), the estimated shift remains well below the experimental energy resolution throughout the overlapping region. We will present this estimate together with a brief discussion of its implications for the extracted Fe-Fe parameters. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract and §5 (Discussion)] The abstract states that the dispersions and spectral weight are 'well captured' by LSWT, but no quantitative measures of fit quality (such as chi-squared per degree of freedom, parameter uncertainties, or comparison of calculated vs. measured intensities) are provided. This makes it difficult to evaluate how uniquely the hierarchy is determined and whether alternative models could fit equally well.

    Authors: We acknowledge that quantitative indicators of fit quality were omitted from the original submission. In the revised manuscript we will expand §5 (and, if space permits, the abstract) to report the χ² per degree of freedom obtained from the least-squares fit to the dispersion, the uncertainties on the fitted exchange parameters derived from the covariance matrix, and a side-by-side comparison of calculated and measured intensities at representative reciprocal-space points. These additions will allow readers to judge the goodness of fit and to assess whether the minimal set of Fe-Fe interactions uniquely reproduces the observed spectrum. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper fits a standard linear spin-wave theory Hamiltonian to the measured Fe3+ spin-wave dispersions (9-65 meV) to extract Fe-Fe exchange parameters and separately models the low-energy Er3+ CEF excitations (<36 meV) with Er-Er exchange (to produce dispersion) plus Er-Fe coupling (to lift Kramers degeneracy). These steps are direct parameter extraction from independent time-of-flight neutron data rather than any self-referential reduction; the observed spectrum is not redefined in terms of the fitted outputs, no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported via self-citation, and the reported interaction hierarchy follows from the distinct energy scales and model fits to separate spectral components. The experimental observations supply external grounding, so the derivation chain remains non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the applicability of linear spin wave theory to the Fe sublattice and on the interpretation that observed low-energy features arise solely from Er-Er and Er-Fe exchanges; the Fe-Fe exchange constants are free parameters fitted to the data.

free parameters (1)
  • Fe-Fe exchange parameters
    Extracted by fitting observed spin-wave dispersions and spectral weights to linear spin wave theory; specific numerical values not given in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Linear spin wave theory accurately describes the Fe3+ sublattice excitations across 9-65 meV
    Invoked to capture dispersions and spectral weight and to extract exchange parameters.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5550 in / 1511 out tokens · 44884 ms · 2026-05-07T06:37:26.696290+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    shows dispersive character of the 0.5meV excitation along main crystallographic directions modeled by domi- nating in-plane Nd–Nd interactions. In TmFeO3 [33] two lowest excitations below 8meV exhibit pronounced dis- persion along both directions of the (0KL) plane, while YbFeO3 [12] shows weakly dispersive dispersion con- fined to the (00L) direction. Fo...

    work page

  2. [2]

    and zero effective field. We determined the initial parameters by employing the point-charge model [56] in coordinate system aligned with the main crystal axes and a 3Å neighbour distance cutoff of the Er 3+ site, i.e., considering eight nearest-neighbour O 2− ligands. This model gives a good approximation of the observed CEF excitations energies and rela...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The interaction between Er- and Fe-sublattices should result in hybridization of the CEF and magnon excita- 8 tions and potentially anticrossing

    suggest the 0.2T dipolar field from Fe sublattice, and equal contribution from Er-Fe exchange interactions, consistent with our results. The interaction between Er- and Fe-sublattices should result in hybridization of the CEF and magnon excita- 8 tions and potentially anticrossing. We did not observe such effects in the measured spectra, see for example F...

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    W. Lin, J. He, B. Ma, M. Matzelle, J. Xu, J. Freeland, Y. Choi, D. Haskel, B. Barbiellini, A. Bansil, G. A. Fiete, J. Zhou, and C. L. Chien, Evidence for spin swapping in an antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys.18, 800 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    J. R. Hortensius, D. Afanasiev, M. Matthiesen, R. Leen- ders, R. Citro, A. V. Kimel, R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, B. A. Ivanov,andA.D.Caviglia,Coherentspin-wavetransport in an antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys.17, 1001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    X. Ma, W. Fan, G. Zhao, H. Chen, C. Wang, B. Kang, Z. Feng, J.-Y. Ge, W. Ren, and S. Cao, Low field control of spin switching and continuous magnetic transition in an ErFeO3 single crystal, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.24, 735 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    X. X. Zhang, Z. C. Xia, Y. J. Ke, X. Q. Zhang, Z. H. Cheng, Z. W. Ouyang, J. F. Wang, S. Huang, F. Yang, Y. J. Song, G. L. Xiao, H. Deng, and D. Q. Jiang, Mag- netic behavior and complete high-field magnetic phase diagram of the orthoferrite ErFeO3, Phys. Rev. B100, 054418 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    M. P. Zic, W. T. Fuhrman, K. Wang, S. Ran, J. Paglione, and N. P. Butch, Coupled spin waves and crystalline elec- tric field levels in candidate multiferroic ErFeO3, J. Appl. Phys.130, 014102 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Adachi, K.-i

    H. Adachi, K.-i. Uchida, E. Saitoh, and S. Maekawa, Theory of the spin Seebeck effect, Rep. Prog. Phys.76, 036501 (2013)

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Jungwirth, X

    T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagneticspintronics,Nat.Nanotechnol.11,231 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    J. Xu, J. He, J.-S. Zhou, D. Qu, S.-Y. Huang, and C. L. Chien, Observation of Vector Spin Seebeck Effect in a Noncollinear Antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 117202 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    D. Kim, S. Dasgupta, X. Ma, J.-M. Park, H.-T. Wei, X. Li, L. Luo, J. Doumani, W. Yang, D. Cheng, R. H. J. Kim, H. O. Everitt, S. Kimura, H. Nojiri, J. Wang, S. Cao, M. Bamba, K. R. A. Hazzard, and J. Kono, Observation of the magnonic Dicke superradiant phase transition, Sci. Adv.11, eadt1691 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Kumar, A

    A. Kumar, A. K. Bera, C. Balz, I. Da Silva, and S. M. Yusuf, Exchange interactions, anisotropy, and low- temperature magnetization reversal in NdFeO3, Phys. Rev. B112, 094444 (2025). 11

    work page 2025

  15. [16]

    X. Li, D. Kim, Y. Liu, and J. Kono, Terahertz spin dy- namics in rare-earth orthoferrites, Photonics Insights1, R05 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [17]

    Gorodetsky, R

    G. Gorodetsky, R. M. Hornreich, I. Yaeger, H. Pinto, G. Shachar, and H. Shaked, Magnetic Structure of ErFeO3 below 4.5°K, Phys. Rev. B8, 3398 (1973)

    work page 1973

  17. [18]

    G. Deng, P. Guo, W. Ren, S. Cao, H. E. Maynard-Casely, M. Avdeev, and G. J. McIntyre, The magnetic structures and transitions of a potential multiferroic orthoferrite ErFeO3, J. Appl. Phys.117, 164105 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [19]

    I. Fita, R. Puzniak, E. E. Zubov, P. Iwanowski, and A. Wisniewski, Temperature-driven spin switching and exchange bias in the ErFeO3 ferrimagnet, Phys. Rev. B 105, 094424 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [20]

    D. G. Oh, J. H. Kim, H. J. Shin, Y. J. Choi, and N. Lee, Anisotropic and nonlinear magnetodielectric effects in or- thoferrite ErFeO3 single crystals, Sci. Rep.10, 11825 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [21]

    Yokota, T

    H. Yokota, T. Nozue, S. Nakamura, H. Hojo, M. Fuku- naga, P.-E. Janolin, J.-M. Kiat, and A. Fuwa, Ferroelec- tricity and weak ferromagnetism of hexagonal ErFeO3 thin films, Phys. Rev. B92, 054101 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [22]

    D. M. Juraschek, M. Fechner, A. V. Balatsky, and N. A. Spaldin, Dynamical multiferroicity, Phys. Rev. Mater.1, 014401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [23]

    B 26, 2008 (1970)

    M.Marezio, J.P.Remeika,andP.D.Dernier,Thecrystal chemistry of the rare earth orthoferrites, Acta Cryst. B 26, 2008 (1970)

    work page 2008

  23. [24]

    E. O. Wollan and W. C. Koehler, Neutron diffrac- tion study of the magnetic properties of the series of perovskite-type compounds[(1−x)La, xCa]Mno 3, Phys. Rev.100, 545 (1955)

    work page 1955

  24. [25]

    W. C. Koehler, E. O. Wollan, and M. K. Wilkinson, Neutron Diffraction Study of the Magnetic Properties of Rare-Earth-Iron Perovskites, Phys. Rev.118, 58 (1960)

    work page 1960

  25. [26]

    The capitalized symbol denotes the type of orderingF (ferromagnetic)A/G/C(antiferromagnetic) and the sub- script denotes the direction of the moment’s component

    ThenotationfollowsKoehler[22]andBertaut[?] works. The capitalized symbol denotes the type of orderingF (ferromagnetic)A/G/C(antiferromagnetic) and the sub- script denotes the direction of the moment’s component. The bold component is the one with the highest ampli- tude

    work page

  26. [27]

    K. P. Belov, A. M. Kadomtseva, N. M. Kovtun, V. N. Derkachenko, V. N. Melov, and V. A. Khokhlov, On the character of phase transitions in ErFeO3, phys. status solidi (a)36, 415 (1976)

    work page 1976

  27. [28]

    Physik204, 101 (1967)

    R.Faulhaber, S.Hüfner, E.Orlich,andH.Schuchert,Op- tical investigation of ErFeO3, Z. Physik204, 101 (1967)

    work page 1967

  28. [29]

    D. L. Wood, J. P. Remeika, L. M. Holmes, and E. M. Gyorgy, Effect of y and bi substitution on spin reorienta- tion and optical absorption in erfeo3, Journal of Applied Physics40, 1245 (1969)

    work page 1969

  29. [30]

    D. L. Wood, L. M. Holmes, and J. P. Remeika, Exchange fields and optical zeeman effect in erfeo3, Phys. Rev.185, 689 (1969)

    work page 1969

  30. [31]

    Yamaguchi, T

    K. Yamaguchi, T. Kurihara, Y. Minami, M. Nakajima, and T. Suemoto, Terahertz time-domain observation of spin reorientation in orthoferriteerfeo 3 through mag- netic free induction decay, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 137204 (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [32]

    R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, T. J. Huisman, R. V. Pisarev, T. Rasing, and A. V. Kimel, Selective excitation of tera- hertz magnetic and electric dipoles inEr3+ ions by fem- tosecond laser pulses inerfeo 3, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 017205 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [33]

    S. E. Hahn, A. A. Podlesnyak, G. Ehlers, G. E. Granroth, R. S. Fishman, A. I. Kolesnikov, E. Pomjakushina, and K. Conder, Inelastic neutron scattering studies of YFeO3, Phys. Rev. B89, 014420 (2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [34]

    A. K. Ovsianikov, O. V. Usmanov, I. A. Zobkalo, W. Schmidt, A. Maity, V. Hutanu, E. Ressouche, K. A. Shaykhutdinov, K. Y. Terentjev, S. V. Semenov, M. Meven, G. Roth, and L. Peters, Inelastic neutron studies and diffraction in magnetic fields of TbFeO3 and YbFeO3, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 563, 170025 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [35]

    A. K. Ovsyanikov, I. A. Zobkalo, W. Schmidt, S. N. Bar- ilo, S. A. Guretskii, and V. Hutanu, Neutron inelastic scattering study of rare-earth orthoferrite HoFeO3, Jour- nal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials507, 166855 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [36]

    Skorobogatov, S

    S. Skorobogatov, S. E. Nikitin, K. Shaykhutdinov, A. Balaev, K. Y. Terentjev, G. Ehlers, G. Sala, E. Pomjakushina, K. Conder, and A. Podlesnyak, Low- temperature spin dynamics in the tmfeo 3 orthoferrite with a non-kramers ion, Physical Review B101, 014432 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [37]

    S. E. Nikitin, L. S. Wu, A. S. Sefat, K. A. Shaykhutdi- nov, Z. Lu, S. Meng, E. V. Pomjakushina, K. Conder, G. Ehlers, M. D. Lumsden, A. I. Kolesnikov, S. Bar- ilo, S. A. Guretskii, D. S. Inosov, and A. Podlesnyak, Decoupled spin dynamics in the rare-earth orthoferrite YbFeO3: Evolution of magnetic excitations through the spin-reorientation transition, Ph...

    work page 2018

  37. [38]

    Podlesnyak, S

    A. Podlesnyak, S. E. Nikitin, and G. Ehlers, Low-energy spin dynamics in rare-earth perovskite oxides, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter33, 403001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [39]

    Przeniosło, I

    R. Przeniosło, I. Sosnowska, M. Loewenhaupt, and A. Taylor, Crystal field excitations of NdFeO3, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials140-144, 2151 (1995)

    work page 1995

  39. [40]

    S. M. Shapiro, J. D. Axe, and J. P. Remeika, Neutron- scattering studies of spin waves in rare-earth orthofer- rites, Phys. Rev. B10, 2014 (1974)

    work page 2014

  40. [41]

    O’Brien, G

    J. O’Brien, G. Deng, X. Ma, Z. Feng, W. Ren, S. Cao, D. Yu, G. J. McIntyre, and C. Ulrich, Gi- ant shifts of crystal-field excitations in ErFeO3 driven by internal magnetic fields (2023), arXiv preprint, DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2109.07667

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.07667 2023

  41. [42]

    A. Ovsianikov,The role of exchange interactions in the formation of the magnetic structure in rare-earth ortho- ferrites RFeO3 (R=Ho, Tb, Yb),Dissertation,Rheinisch- Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [43]

    R. I. Bewley, R. S. Eccleston, K. A. McEwen, S. M. Hay- den, M. T. Dove, S. M. Bennington, J. R. Treadgold, and R. L. S. Coleman, MERLIN, a new high count rate spec- trometer at ISIS, Phys. B: Condens. Matter385-386, 1029 (2006). 12

    work page 2006

  43. [44]

    Mantid (2013): Manipulation and analysis toolkit for instrument data.; mantid project.,http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5286/SOFTWARE/MANTID6.13

    work page doi:10.5286/software/mantid6.13 2013

  44. [45]

    Arnold, J

    O. Arnold, J. Bilheux, J. Borreguero, A. Buts, S. Camp- bell, L. Chapon, M. Doucet, N. Draper, R. F. Leal, M. Gigg, V. Lynch, A. Markvardsen, D. Mikkelson, R. Mikkelson, R. Miller, K. Palmen, P. Parker, G. Passos, T. Perring, P. Peterson, S. Ren, M. Reuter, A. Savici, J. Taylor, R. Taylor, R. Tolchenov, W. Zhou, and J. Zikovsky, Mantid—data analysis and v...

    work page 2014

  45. [46]

    Ewings, A

    R. Ewings, A. Buts, M. Le, J. van Duijn, I. Bustin- duy, and T. Perring, Horace: Software for the analysis of data from single crystal spectroscopy experiments at time-of-flight neutron instruments, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Acceler- ators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equip- ment834, 132 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [47]

    analysis.stfc.ac.uk, accessed: 2025-11-11

    ISIS Data Analysis as a Service,https://isis. analysis.stfc.ac.uk, accessed: 2025-11-11

    work page 2025

  47. [48]

    Toth and B

    S. Toth and B. Lake, Linear spin wave theory for single-q incommensurate magnetic structures, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter27, 166002 (2015)

    work page 2015

  48. [49]

    Stekiel, Implementation of SpinW in python,https: //github.com/mstekiel/spinwaves, accessed: 2025-11- 11

    M. Stekiel, Implementation of SpinW in python,https: //github.com/mstekiel/spinwaves, accessed: 2025-11- 11

    work page 2025

  49. [50]

    Dahlbom, H

    D. Dahlbom, H. Zhang, C. Miles, S. Quinn, A. Niraula, B. Thipe, M. Wilson, S. Matin, H. Mankad, S. Hahn, D. Pajerowski, S. Johnston, Z. Wang, H. Lane, Y. W. Li, X. Bai, M. Mourigal, C. D. Batista, and K. Bar- ros, Sunny.jl: A julia package for spin dynamics (2025), arXiv:2501.13095 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [51]

    Scheie,PyCrystalField: software for calculation, anal- ysis and fitting of crystal electric field Hamiltonians, Journal of Applied Crystallography54, 356 (2021)

    A. Scheie,PyCrystalField: software for calculation, anal- ysis and fitting of crystal electric field Hamiltonians, Journal of Applied Crystallography54, 356 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [52]

    Momma and F

    K. Momma and F. Izumi,VESTA: a three-dimensional visualization system for electronic and structural analy- sis, Journal of Applied Crystallography41, 653 (2008)

    work page 2008

  52. [53]

    K. Park, H. Sim, J. C. Leiner, Y. Yoshida, J. Jeong, S.-i. Yano, J.Gardner, P.Bourges, M.Klicpera, V.Sechovský, M. Boehm, and J.-G. Park, Low-energy spin dynamics of orthoferrites AFeO3 (A = Y, La, Bi), Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter30, 235802 (2018)

    work page 2018

  53. [54]

    B: Condens

    A.Gukasov, U.Steigenberger, S.Barilo,andS.Guretskii, Neutron scattering study of spin waves in TbFeO3, Phys. B: Condens. Matter234-236, 760 (1997), proceedings of the First European Conference on Neutron Scattering

    work page 1997

  54. [55]

    R. M. White, R. J. Nemanich, and C. Herring, Light scat- tering from magnetic excitations in orthoferrites, Phys. Rev. B25, 1822 (1982)

    work page 1982

  55. [56]

    Toth and B

    S. Toth and B. Lake, Linear spin wave theory for single-Q incommensurate magnetic structures, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter27, 166002 (2015)

    work page 2015

  56. [57]

    K. W. H. Stevens, Matrix elements and operator equiva- lentsconnectedwiththemagneticpropertiesofrareearth ions, Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A65, 209 (1952)

    work page 1952

  57. [58]

    From the symmetry point of view, the coexistence of Fe3+ (Γ2,P bn ′m′) and Er3+ (Γ1,P bnm.1) magnetic or- derings belowT Er N leads to the monoclinicP2 1/b.11 1 (non-standard setting ofP2 1/c.1magnetic space group) symmetry[15]with1(trivial)site-symmetrypointgroup, whichin-principleliftsallrestrictionsonCEFB m l param- eters. However, as magnetocrystallin...

    work page

  58. [59]

    M. T. Hutchings, Point-charge calculations of energy lev- els of magnetic ions in crystalline electric fields (Aca- demic Press) pp. 227–273, ISSN: 0081-1947

    work page 1947

  59. [60]

    TheB 0 2 O0 2 +B 1 2 O1 2 anisotropy is equivalent toB0 2(3J2 z −

    work page

  60. [61]

    ForB m n values from Tab.I this givestiltedanisotropyellipsoid, withthemain(easy)axis vector tilted 30 degrees away from thez-axis toward the xaxis

    + 1 2 B1 2(JxJz +J zJx). ForB m n values from Tab.I this givestiltedanisotropyellipsoid, withthemain(easy)axis vector tilted 30 degrees away from thez-axis toward the xaxis

    work page

  61. [62]

    The dipolar interactions involve all ions and take mag- netic moments as parameters, that is 5µB for iron and 9µ B for erbium

    work page

  62. [63]

    R. M. Bozorth, V. Kramer, and J. P. Remeika, Magne- tization in Single Crystals of Some Rare-Earth Orthofer- rites, Phys. Rev. Lett.1, 3 (1958)

    work page 1958

  63. [64]

    Y. B. Bazaliy, L. T. Tsymbal, G. N. Kakazei, A. I. Izotov, and P. E. Wigen, Spin-reorientation in ErFeO3: Zero-field transitions, three-dimensional phase diagram, and anisotropy of erbium magnetism, Phys. Rev. B69, 104429 (2004)

    work page 2004

  64. [65]

    R.L.White,ReviewofRecentWorkontheMagneticand SpectroscopicPropertiesoftheRare-EarthOrthoferrites, Journal of Applied Physics40, 1061 (1969)

    work page 1969

  65. [66]

    D. R. Bhosale, P. Fabrykiewicz, M. Meven, A. Schnei- dewind, A. Devashi, and M. Stekiel, High-energy spin dynamics in multiferroic ErFeO 3 for magnon trans- port application, STFC ISIS Neutron and Muon Source, https://doi.org/10.5286/ISIS.E.RB2510189 (2025)

    work page doi:10.5286/isis.e.rb2510189 2025