pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.27995 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

The status of theory in the electroweak sector: Radiative corrections, salient features, approximations

Stefan Dittmaier
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 04:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords electroweak radiative correctionsprecision calculationsLHCdi-boson productionvector-boson scatteringtri-boson productiongauge bosons
0
0 comments X

The pith

Electroweak radiative corrections are a crucial ingredient in modern precision calculations for particle processes at high-energy colliders.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reviews why electroweak radiative corrections matter for accurate predictions in collider physics at facilities like the Large Hadron Collider. It describes the main features of these corrections and the standard methods used to compute them. Recent developments are shown through examples of multi-gauge-boson processes, specifically massive di-boson production, vector-boson scattering, and massive tri-boson production. A reader would care because these corrections affect the reliability of theoretical predictions that experiments rely on to test the standard model and search for new physics. The review aims to provide an overview of the current theoretical status in the electroweak sector.

Core claim

Electroweak radiative corrections form a crucial ingredient in modern precision calculations for particle processes at high-energy colliders such as the Large Hadron Collider. The salient features of electroweak corrections as well as currently used techniques and concepts for their calculation are reviewed. Recent progress in this enterprise is illustrated in a discussion of electroweak multi-gauge-boson production processes: massive di-boson production, vector-boson scattering, and massive tri-boson production.

What carries the argument

The techniques and concepts for calculating electroweak radiative corrections, applied to multi-gauge-boson production processes at colliders.

If this is right

  • Accurate predictions for di-boson production cross sections at the LHC require accounting for these radiative corrections.
  • Calculations for vector-boson scattering can now incorporate electroweak effects to better probe the mechanism of electroweak symmetry breaking.
  • Progress in tri-boson production calculations provides reliable benchmarks for experimental analyses at current and future colliders.
  • The review underscores the need for continued development of computational tools to match increasing experimental precision.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These methods could be extended to even higher multiplicities or combined with QCD corrections for more complete predictions.
  • Future colliders with higher energies and luminosities will demand even more precise electroweak calculations based on the foundations reviewed here.
  • Discrepancies between theory and experiment in these processes might indicate the need for refinements in the approximations used.

Load-bearing premise

The review assumes that the described techniques, approximations, and cited recent progress accurately and comprehensively represent the current state of electroweak correction calculations without major omissions or outdated elements.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement or independent theoretical calculation in vector-boson scattering or tri-boson production that deviates significantly from the predictions using the reviewed methods, beyond estimated uncertainties, would indicate incompleteness in the current framework.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27995 by Stefan Dittmaier.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Typical diagram structures for EW di-boson production (left), EW vector-boson view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left: state-of-the-art prediction for W+W−(→ e +νeµ −ν¯µ) production pro￾vided by Matrix (taken from Ref. [71]). Right: NLO QCD+EW corrections to pp → WW/ZZ → e +e −νν¯ + X as well as different variants (additive versus multiplicative) to combine QCD and EW corrections (taken from Ref. [73]). by the Sudakov regime of the underlying qq¯ → WW process, while the EW corrections to the invariant-mass distributi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of the NLO EW corrections for view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Typical LO interference diagrams for VBS processes, contributing to the LO view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: NLO predictions for like-sign W-pair production at the LHC, differential in the view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Structure of diagrams contributing to the factorizable NLO virtual corrections in the ms for WWW production: LO diagram with three potentially LO diibiWH(WW∗) di(iddl) view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: NLO prediction for W+W+W− production in the fully leptonic final state, differential in the transverse momentum of one of the leptons (left), and the rapidity difference between the lepton ℓ − and the leading lepton ℓ + (with higher pT, right). On the left, the relative corrections of different origin are shown; on the right, the full NLO correction is compared to its counterpart in TPA. (Taken from Ref. [… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: NLO prediction for WWW production with one hadronically and two lepton￾ically decaying W bosons, differential in the transverse momentum of one of the leptons (left) and the rapidity difference of the two charged leptons (right). (Taken from Ref. [89].) selected results for WWW production are shown in view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Electroweak radiative corrections form a crucial ingredient in modern precision calculations for particle processes at high-energy colliders such as the Large Hadron Collider. The salient features of electroweak corrections as well as currently used techniques and concepts for their calculation are reviewed. Recent progress in this enterprise is illustrated in a discussion of electroweak multi-gauge-boson production processes: massive di-boson production, vector-boson scattering, and massive tri-boson production.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review that positions electroweak radiative corrections as essential for precision calculations of particle processes at high-energy colliders such as the LHC. It surveys the salient features of these corrections along with standard techniques and concepts used in their computation, then illustrates recent progress through discussions of massive di-boson production, vector-boson scattering, and massive tri-boson production.

Significance. A comprehensive and current review of this type would be useful to the community as a consolidated reference on a topic central to LHC phenomenology. The choice to ground the discussion in concrete multi-boson processes adds practical value, provided the cited techniques and progress accurately reflect the state of the field without major omissions.

minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract and title are clear, but the manuscript should explicitly state the time period covered by the 'recent progress' discussion to help readers assess timeliness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their report and for summarizing the scope of our review on electroweak radiative corrections. The referee correctly identifies the manuscript as a survey of salient features, techniques, and recent progress illustrated via di-boson production, vector-boson scattering, and tri-boson production. We note that the recommendation is listed as uncertain, yet the report contains no specific major comments or points of criticism. We are available to provide further details or clarifications should any concerns arise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper with no derivation chain or circularity

full rationale

This is a review article that summarizes existing literature on electroweak radiative corrections, their salient features, calculation techniques, and recent progress illustrated via multi-gauge-boson processes. No new first-principles derivation, quantitative prediction, or ansatz is advanced that could reduce to its own inputs by construction. The abstract and structure position the work as synthesis of prior results rather than a self-contained chain of claims; therefore no self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citation reductions exist. The paper remains self-contained against external benchmarks in the field.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper the work introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it relies entirely on the existing electroweak theory and cited literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5366 in / 1095 out tokens · 65088 ms · 2026-05-07T04:59:01.016232+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Aad, et al., Characterising the Higgs boson with ATLAS data from the LHC Run-2, Phys

    G. Aad, et al., Characterising the Higgs boson with ATLAS data from the LHC Run-2, Phys. Rept. 1116 (2025) 4–56. arXiv:2404.05498, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.11.001. 8As experience shows, this is no guarantee for correct results though. 21

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.11.001 2025

  2. [2]

    Aad, et al., Electroweak, QCD and flavour physics studies with AT- LAS data from Run 2 of the LHC, Phys

    G. Aad, et al., Electroweak, QCD and flavour physics studies with AT- LAS data from Run 2 of the LHC, Phys. Rept. 1116 (2025) 57–126. arXiv:2404.06829, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.12.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.12.003 2025

  3. [3]

    Climbing to the Top of the ATLAS 13 TeV data

    G. Aad, et al., Climbing to the Top of the ATLAS 13 TeV data, Phys. Rept. 1116 (2025) 127–183. arXiv:2404.10674, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.12.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.12.004 2025

  4. [4]

    Stairway to discovery: a report on the CMS programme of cross section measurements from millibarns to femtobarns

    A. Hayrapetyan, et al., Stairway to discovery: A report on the CMS programme of cross section measurements from millibarns to femtobarns, Phys. Rept. 1115 (2025) 3–115. arXiv:2405.18661, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.11.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.11.005 2025

  5. [5]

    Denner, S

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, Electroweak Radiative Corrections for Col- lider Physics, Phys. Rept. 864 (2020) 1–163. arXiv:1912.06823, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.04.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.04.001 2020

  6. [6]

    S. Amoroso, et al., Les Houches 2019: Physics at TeV Colliders: Stan- dard Model Working Group Report, in: 11th Les Houches Work- shop on Physics at TeV Colliders: PhysTeV Les Houches, 2020. arXiv:2003.01700

    work page arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Heinrich, Collider Physics at the Precision Frontier, Phys

    G. Heinrich, Collider Physics at the Precision Frontier, Phys. Rept. 922 (2021) 1–69. arXiv:2009.00516, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2021.03.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2021.03.006 2021

  8. [8]

    Tricoli, M

    A. Tricoli, M. Schönherr, P. Azzurri, Vector Bosons and Jets in Proton Collisions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 (2) (2021) 025007. arXiv:2012.13967, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025007

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.93.025007 2021

  9. [9]

    Covarelli, M

    R. Covarelli, M. Pellen, M. Zaro, Vector-Boson scattering at the LHC: Unraveling the electroweak sector, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36 (16) (2021) 2130009. arXiv:2102.10991, doi:10.1142/S0217751X2130009X

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x2130009x 2021

  10. [10]

    Maltoni, et al., TF07 Snowmass Report: Theory of Collider Phenom- enaarXiv:2210.02591

    F. Maltoni, et al., TF07 Snowmass Report: Theory of Collider Phenom- enaarXiv:2210.02591

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    S. P. Jones, An Overview of Standard Model Calculations for Higgs Boson Production & Decay, LHEP 2023 (2023) 442. doi:10.31526/lhep.2023.442. 22

    work page doi:10.31526/lhep.2023.442 2023

  12. [12]

    Les Houches 2023 -- Physics at TeV Colliders: Report on the Standard Model Precision Wishlist

    A. Huss, et al., Les Houches 2023 – Physics at TeV Colliders: Report on the Standard Model Precision WishlistarXiv:2504.06689

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Chiesa, F

    M. Chiesa, F. Piccinini, A. Vicini, Direct determination ofsin2 θℓ ef f at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 100 (7) (2019) 071302. arXiv:1906.11569, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.071302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.071302 2019

  14. [14]

    R. G. Stuart, Gauge invariance, analyticity and physical observables at the Z0 resonance, Phys. Lett. B 262 (1991) 113–119. doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(91)90653-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0370- 1991

  15. [15]

    Aeppli, G

    A. Aeppli, G. J. van Oldenborgh, D. Wyler, Unstable particles in one loop calculations, Nucl. Phys. B 428 (1994) 126–146. arXiv:hep- ph/9312212, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90195-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90195-3 1994

  16. [16]

    Dittmaier, M

    S. Dittmaier, M. Huber, Radiative corrections to the neutral-current Drell-Yan process in the Standard Model and its minimal su- persymmetric extension, JHEP 01 (2010) 060. arXiv:0911.2329, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2010)060

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2010)060 2010

  17. [17]

    Dittmaier, C

    S. Dittmaier, C. Schwan, Non-factorizable photonic corrections to reso- nant production and decay of many unstable particles, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (3) (2016) 144. arXiv:1511.01698, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3968- 1

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3968- 2016

  18. [18]

    Dittmaier, A

    S. Dittmaier, A. Huss, C. Schwinn, Mixed QCD-electroweakO(α sα) corrections to Drell-Yan processes in the resonance region: pole ap- proximation and non-factorizable corrections, Nucl. Phys. B 885 (2014) 318–372. arXiv:1403.3216, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.05.027

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.05.027 2014

  19. [19]

    Denner, S

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, M. Roth, L. H. Wieders, Electroweak cor- rections to charged-current e +e− →4fermion processes: Technical details and further results, Nucl. Phys. B 724 (2005) 247–294, [Er- ratum: Nucl.Phys.B 854, 504–507 (2012)]. arXiv:hep-ph/0505042, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.09.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.09.001 2005

  20. [20]

    Biedermann, et al., Next-to-leading-order electroweak corrections topp→W +W − →4 leptons at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2016) 065

    B. Biedermann, et al., Next-to-leading-order electroweak corrections topp→W +W − →4 leptons at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2016) 065. arXiv:1605.03419, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2016)065. 23

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2016)065 2016

  21. [21]

    Dittmaier, G

    S. Dittmaier, G. Knippen, C. Schwan, Next-to-leading-order QCD and electroweak corrections to triple-W production with leptonic decays at the LHC, JHEP 02 (2020) 003. arXiv:1912.04117, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2020)003

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2020)003 2020

  22. [22]

    Dittmaier, A

    S. Dittmaier, A. Huss, C. Schwinn, Dominant mixed QCD- electroweak O(αsα) corrections to Drell–Yan processes in the reso- nance region, Nucl. Phys. B 904 (2016) 216–252. arXiv:1511.08016, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.01.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.01.006 2016

  23. [23]

    Dittmaier, A

    S. Dittmaier, A. Huss, J. Schwarz, Mixed NNLO QCD×electroweak corrections to single-Z production in pole approximation: differential distributions and forward-backward asymmetry, JHEP 05 (2024) 170. arXiv:2401.15682, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)170

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2024)170 2024

  24. [24]

    Buonocore, et al., Mixed QCD-EW corrections topp→ℓν ℓ+X at the LHC, Phys

    L. Buonocore, et al., Mixed QCD-EW corrections topp→ℓν ℓ+X at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 114012. arXiv:2102.12539, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114012

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.114012 2021

  25. [25]

    Bonciani, et al., Mixed Strong-Electroweak Corrections to the Drell- Yan Process, Phys

    R. Bonciani, et al., Mixed Strong-Electroweak Corrections to the Drell- Yan Process, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (1) (2022) 012002. arXiv:2106.11953, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.012002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.012002 2022

  26. [26]

    Armadillo, et al., Two-loop mixed QCD-EW corrections to neu- tral current Drell-Yan, JHEP 05 (2022) 072

    T. Armadillo, et al., Two-loop mixed QCD-EW corrections to neu- tral current Drell-Yan, JHEP 05 (2022) 072. arXiv:2201.01754, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2022)072

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2022)072 2022

  27. [27]

    Buccioni, et al., Mixed QCD-electroweak corrections to dilepton pro- duction at the LHC in the high invariant mass region, JHEP 06 (2022)

    F. Buccioni, et al., Mixed QCD-electroweak corrections to dilepton pro- duction at the LHC in the high invariant mass region, JHEP 06 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    arXiv:2203.11237, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2022)022

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2022)022 2022

  29. [29]

    Denner, S

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, M. Roth, D. Wackeroth, Predictions for all processes e+e− →4fermions +γ, Nucl. Phys. B 560 (1999) 33–65. arXiv:hep-ph/9904472, doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00437-X

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(99)00437-x 1999

  30. [30]

    Cullen, et al., GOSAM-2.0: a tool for automated one-loop calcula- tions within the Standard Model and beyond, Eur

    G. Cullen, et al., GOSAM-2.0: a tool for automated one-loop calcula- tions within the Standard Model and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (8) (2014) 3001. arXiv:1404.7096, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3001-5. 24

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3001-5 2014

  31. [31]

    Frederix, S

    R. Frederix, et al., The automation of next-to-leading order electroweak calculations, JHEP 07 (2018) 185, [Erratum: JHEP 11, 085 (2021)]. arXiv:1804.10017, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)085

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2021)085 2018

  32. [32]

    Honeywell, S

    S. Honeywell, S. Quackenbush, L. Reina, C. Reuschle, NLOX, a one- loop provider for Standard Model processes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 257 (2020) 107284. arXiv:1812.11925, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107284

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107284 2020

  33. [33]

    Buccioni, et al., OpenLoops 2, Eur

    F. Buccioni, et al., OpenLoops 2, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (10) (2019) 866. arXiv:1907.13071, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7306-2

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7306-2 2019

  34. [34]

    Actis, et al., Recursive generation of one-loop amplitudes in the Standard Model, JHEP 04 (2013) 037

    S. Actis, et al., Recursive generation of one-loop amplitudes in the Standard Model, JHEP 04 (2013) 037. arXiv:1211.6316, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2013)037

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2013)037 2013

  35. [35]

    Actis, et al., RECOLA: REcursive Computation of One-Loop Ampli- tudes, Comput

    S. Actis, et al., RECOLA: REcursive Computation of One-Loop Ampli- tudes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 214 (2017) 140–173. arXiv:1605.01090, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2017.01.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2017.01.004 2017

  36. [36]

    Collier: A fortran-based complex one-loop library in extended regularizations

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, L. Hofer, Collier: a fortran-based Complex One-Loop LIbrary in Extended Regularizations, Com- put. Phys. Commun. 212 (2017) 220–238. arXiv:1604.06792, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2016.10.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2016.10.013 2017

  37. [37]

    Beneke, A

    M. Beneke, A. P. Chapovsky, A. Signer, G. Zanderighi, Effective theory approach to unstable particle production, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 011602. arXiv:hep-ph/0312331, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.011602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.011602 2004

  38. [38]

    Beneke, A

    M. Beneke, A. P. Chapovsky, A. Signer, G. Zanderighi, Effective theory calculation of resonant high-energy scattering, Nucl. Phys. B686 (2004) 205–247. arXiv:hep-ph/0401002, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.03.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.03.016 2004

  39. [39]

    A. H. Hoang, C. J. Reisser, Electroweak absorptive parts in NRQCD matching conditions, Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 074022. arXiv:hep- ph/0412258, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.074022

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.074022 2005

  40. [40]

    Dittmaier, M

    S. Dittmaier, M. Krämer, Electroweak radiative corrections to W bo- son production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 073007. arXiv:hep-ph/0109062, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.073007. 25

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.073007 2002

  41. [41]

    S.Dittmaier, AGeneralapproachtophotonradiationofffermions, Nucl. Phys. B 565 (2000) 69–122. arXiv:hep-ph/9904440, doi:10.1016/S0550- 3213(99)00563-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550- 2000

  42. [42]

    Dittmaier, A

    S. Dittmaier, A. Kabelschacht, T. Kasprzik, Polarized QED split- tings of massive fermions and dipole subtraction for non-collinear- safe observables, Nucl. Phys. B 800 (2008) 146–189. arXiv:0802.1405, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.03.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.03.010 2008

  43. [43]

    Catani, M.H

    S. Catani, M. H. Seymour, A General algorithm for calculating jet cross-sections in NLO QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 485 (1997) 291–419, [Er- ratum: Nucl.Phys.B 510, 503–504 (1998)]. arXiv:hep-ph/9605323, doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(96)00589-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(96)00589-5 1997

  44. [44]

    Frixione, Z

    S. Frixione, Z. Kunszt, A. Signer, Three jet cross-sections to next-to- leading order, Nucl. Phys. B 467 (1996) 399–442. arXiv:hep-ph/9512328, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00110-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00110-1 1996

  45. [45]

    B. W. Harris, J. F. Owens, The Two cutoff phase space slicing method, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 094032. arXiv:hep-ph/0102128, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.094032

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.094032 2002

  46. [46]

    Bertone, et al., Improving methods and predictions at high-energy e+e− colliders within collinear factorisation, JHEP 10 (2022) 089

    V. Bertone, et al., Improving methods and predictions at high-energy e+e− colliders within collinear factorisation, JHEP 10 (2022) 089. arXiv:2207.03265, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2022)089

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2022)089 2022

  47. [47]

    A. B. Arbuzov, U. E. Voznaya, Higher-order NLO initial state QED ra- diative corrections toe+e− annihilation revisited, Phys. Rev. D 109 (11) (2024) 113002. arXiv:2405.03443, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.113002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.113002 2024

  48. [48]

    E. W. N. Glover, A. G. Morgan, Measuring the photon frag- mentation function at LEP, Z. Phys. C 62 (1994) 311–322. doi:10.1007/BF01560245

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01560245 1994

  49. [49]

    Buryak, P.D

    S. Frixione, Isolated photons in perturbative QCD, Phys. Lett. B 429 (1998) 369–374. arXiv:hep-ph/9801442, doi:10.1016/S0370- 2693(98)00454-7

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370- 1998

  50. [50]

    Denner, S

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, M. Hecht, C. Pasold, NLO QCD and elec- troweak corrections toW+γproduction with leptonic W-boson decays, JHEP 04 (2015) 018. arXiv:1412.7421, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)018. 26

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)018 2015

  51. [51]

    Denner, S

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, M. Hecht, C. Pasold, NLO QCD and elec- troweak corrections toZ+γproduction with leptonic Z-boson decays, JHEP 02 (2016) 057. arXiv:1510.08742, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2016)057

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2016)057 2016

  52. [52]

    Denner, S

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, M. Pellen, C. Schwan, Low-virtuality photon transitionsγ ∗ →f ¯fand the photon-to-jet conversion function, Phys. Lett. B 798 (2019) 134951. arXiv:1907.02366, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134951

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134951 2019

  53. [53]

    V. S. Fadin, L. N. Lipatov, A. D. Martin, M. Melles, Re- summation of double logarithms in electroweak high-energy pro- cesses, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 094002. arXiv:hep-ph/9910338, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.094002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.094002 2000

  54. [54]

    J. H. Kuhn, A. A. Penin, V. A. Smirnov, Summing up subleading Sudakov logarithms, Eur. Phys. J. C 17 (2000) 97–105. arXiv:hep- ph/9912503, doi:10.1007/s100520000462

    work page doi:10.1007/s100520000462 2000

  55. [55]

    Ciafaloni, P

    M. Ciafaloni, P. Ciafaloni, D. Comelli, Bloch-Nordsieck violat- ing electroweak corrections to inclusive TeV scale hard processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 4810–4813. arXiv:hep-ph/0001142, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4810

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.4810 2000

  56. [56]

    M. Hori, H. Kawamura, J. Kodaira, Electroweak Sudakov at two loop level, Phys. Lett. B 491 (2000) 275–279. arXiv:hep-ph/0007329, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(00)01027-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(00)01027-3 2000

  57. [57]

    Denner, S

    A. Denner, S. Pozzorini, One loop leading logarithms in electroweak radiative corrections. 1. Results, Eur. Phys. J. C 18 (2001) 461–480. arXiv:hep-ph/0010201, doi:10.1007/s100520100551

    work page doi:10.1007/s100520100551 2001

  58. [58]

    Denner, S

    A. Denner, S. Pozzorini, One loop leading logarithms in elec- troweak radiative corrections. 2. Factorization of collinear singular- ities, Eur. Phys. J. C 21 (2001) 63–79. arXiv:hep-ph/0104127, doi:10.1007/s100520100721

    work page doi:10.1007/s100520100721 2001

  59. [59]

    Melles, Resummation of angular dependent corrections in sponta- neously broken gauge theories, Eur

    M. Melles, Resummation of angular dependent corrections in sponta- neously broken gauge theories, Eur. Phys. J. C 24 (2002) 193–204. arXiv:hep-ph/0108221, doi:10.1007/s100520200942. 27

    work page doi:10.1007/s100520200942 2002

  60. [60]

    Beenakker, A

    W. Beenakker, A. Werthenbach, Electroweak two loop Sudakov loga- rithms for on-shell fermions and bosons, Nucl. Phys. B 630 (2002) 3–54. arXiv:hep-ph/0112030, doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00171-2

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(02)00171-2 2002

  61. [61]

    Denner, M

    A. Denner, M. Melles, S. Pozzorini, Two loop electroweak angular de- pendent logarithms at high-energies, Nucl. Phys. B 662 (2003) 299–333. arXiv:hep-ph/0301241, doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(03)00307-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(03)00307-9 2003

  62. [62]

    Jantzen, J

    B. Jantzen, J. H. Kuhn, A. A. Penin, V. A. Smirnov, Two- loop electroweak logarithms, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 051301, [Er- ratum: Phys.Rev.D 74, 019901 (2006)]. arXiv:hep-ph/0504111, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.019901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.019901 2005

  63. [63]

    Jantzen, J

    B. Jantzen, J. H. Kuhn, A. A. Penin, V. A. Smirnov, Two-loop elec- troweak logarithms in four-fermion processes at high energy, Nucl. Phys. B 731 (2005) 188–212, [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 752, 327–328 (2006)]. arXiv:hep-ph/0509157, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.10.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.10.010 2005

  64. [64]

    Denner, B

    A. Denner, B. Jantzen, S. Pozzorini, Two-loop electroweak next-to-leading logarithmic corrections to massless fermionic pro- cesses, Nucl. Phys. B 761 (2007) 1–62. arXiv:hep-ph/0608326, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.10.014

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.10.014 2007

  65. [65]

    J.-y. Chiu, F. Golf, R. Kelley, A. V. Manohar, Electroweak Sudakov cor- rections using effective field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 021802. arXiv:0709.2377, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.021802

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.021802 2008

  66. [66]

    J.-y. Chiu, R. Kelley, A. V. Manohar, Electroweak Corrections using EffectiveFieldTheory: ApplicationstotheLHC,Phys.Rev.D78(2008) 073006. arXiv:0806.1240, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.073006

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.073006 2008

  67. [67]

    Chiesa, et al., Electroweak Sudakov Corrections to New Physics Searches at the LHC, Phys

    M. Chiesa, et al., Electroweak Sudakov Corrections to New Physics Searches at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (12) (2013) 121801. arXiv:1305.6837, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.121801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.121801 2013

  68. [68]

    Bothmann, D

    E. Bothmann, D. Napoletano, Automated evaluation of electroweak Sudakov logarithms in Sherpa, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (11) (2020) 1024. arXiv:2006.14635, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08596-2. 28

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08596-2 2020

  69. [69]

    Pagani, M

    D. Pagani, M. Zaro, One-loop electroweak Sudakov logarithms: a re- visitation and automation, JHEP 02 (2022) 161. arXiv:2110.03714, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2022)161

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2022)161 2022

  70. [70]

    Bacchetta, F

    A. Denner, S. Rode, Automated resummation of electroweak Sudakov logarithms in diboson production at future colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (5) (2024) 542. arXiv:2402.10503, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024- 12879-3

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024- 2024

  71. [71]

    Grazzini, S

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, M. Wiesemann, Fully differential NNLO computations with MATRIX, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (7) (2018) 537. arXiv:1711.06631, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5771-7

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5771-7 2018

  72. [72]

    Grazzini, S

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, M. Wiesemann, J. Y. Yook,W +W − pro- duction at the LHC: NLO QCD corrections to the loop-induced gluon fusion channel, Phys. Lett. B 804 (2020) 135399. arXiv:2002.01877, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135399

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135399 2020

  73. [73]

    Grazzini, et al., NNLO QCD + NLO EW with Matrix+OpenLoops: precise predictions for vector-boson pair production, JHEP 02 (2020)

    M. Grazzini, et al., NNLO QCD + NLO EW with Matrix+OpenLoops: precise predictions for vector-boson pair production, JHEP 02 (2020)

    2020

  74. [74]

    arXiv:1912.00068, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2020)087

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2020)087 1912

  75. [75]

    Kallweit, J

    S. Kallweit, J. M. Lindert, S. Pozzorini, M. Schönherr, NLO QCD+EW predictions for2ℓ2νdiboson signatures at the LHC, JHEP 11 (2017)

    2017

  76. [76]

    arXiv:1705.00598, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2017)120

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2017)120 2017

  77. [77]

    Biedermann, A

    B. Biedermann, A. Denner, L. Hofer, Next-to-leading-order electroweak corrections to the production of three charged leptons plus miss- ing energy at the LHC, JHEP 10 (2017) 043. arXiv:1708.06938, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)043

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2017)043 2017

  78. [78]

    Biedermann, et al., Electroweak corrections topp→µ+µ−e+e− +X at the LHC: a Higgs background study, Phys

    B. Biedermann, et al., Electroweak corrections topp→µ+µ−e+e− +X at the LHC: a Higgs background study, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (16) (2016) 161803. arXiv:1601.07787, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.161803

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.161803 2016

  79. [79]

    Biedermann, et al., Next-to-leading-order electroweak corrections to the production of four charged leptons at the LHC, JHEP 01 (2017) 033

    B. Biedermann, et al., Next-to-leading-order electroweak corrections to the production of four charged leptons at the LHC, JHEP 01 (2017) 033. arXiv:1611.05338, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2017)033

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2017)033 2017

  80. [80]

    Billoni, S

    M. Billoni, S. Dittmaier, B. Jäger, C. Speckner, Next-to-leading or- der electroweak corrections topp→W +W − →4leptons at the LHC 29 in double-pole approximation, JHEP 12 (2013) 043. arXiv:1310.1564, doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2013)043

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2013)043 2013

Showing first 80 references.