pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.00537 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-01 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Magnetic Behavior of Ferro-, Antiferro-, and Ferrimagnetic Systems in the Griffiths Phase: A Theoretical Study

Sumanta Mukherjee This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 18:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Griffiths phaseantiferromagnetic systemsferrimagnetic systemsIsing modelmagnetic behaviorthree-dimensional systemstheoretical framework
0
0 comments X

The pith

A theoretical framework shows that the Griffiths phase exhibits more unusual magnetic behavior in three-dimensional antiferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic systems than in ferromagnetic ones.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a theoretical framework for the magnetic behavior of the Griffiths phase by extending it from three-dimensional spin-1/2 Ising ferromagnetic systems to antiferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic systems. It finds that the magnetic properties in these extended cases are more unusual than those seen in conventional ferromagnetic Griffiths phases. A sympathetic reader would care because many real materials display antiferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic ordering, and a consistent way to recognize the Griffiths phase across these orderings would help interpret their disordered magnetic responses. The work supplies a possible identification framework that preserves qualitative features without introducing new parameters.

Core claim

By extending the theoretical framework originally developed for three-dimensional Ising ferromagnetic systems, the magnetic behavior of the Griffiths phase in antiferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic systems is shown to be more unusual than in conventional ferromagnetic systems. This provides a framework for identifying Griffiths phase behavior in three-dimensional antiferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic systems.

What carries the argument

The extended theoretical framework for magnetic behavior in the Griffiths phase applied to antiferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic systems, which reveals qualitative differences from the ferromagnetic case.

If this is right

  • The Griffiths phase in three-dimensional antiferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic systems exhibits more unusual magnetic properties than in ferromagnetic systems.
  • The extension preserves the same qualitative features of the Griffiths phase without requiring new parameters.
  • This approach supplies a possible framework for identifying Griffiths phase behavior in three-dimensional antiferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic systems.
  • Magnetic behavior studies can now address non-ferromagnetic orderings in three-dimensional disordered systems using the same framework.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Experimentalists could design susceptibility or specific-heat measurements to look for the predicted anomalies specifically in antiferromagnetic samples.
  • The result hints that Griffiths phase concepts apply more broadly across different magnetic orderings, potentially affecting models of disordered magnets in materials.
  • Simulations of antiferromagnetic Ising lattices could directly test whether the unusual features appear without extra tuning.

Load-bearing premise

The framework developed for ferromagnetic Ising systems extends to antiferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic systems while keeping the same qualitative Griffiths phase features without needing new parameters or further validation.

What would settle it

Measurement of magnetic susceptibility or magnetization in a real three-dimensional antiferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic material inside the Griffiths phase region that fails to display the predicted more unusual behavior relative to ferromagnetic cases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00537 by Sumanta Mukherjee.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) An approximate pictorial description of the ran view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) The calculated inverse susceptibility, view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) The calculated inverse susceptibility, view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this report, we provide a theoretical framework for the magnetic behavior of the Griffiths phase, which, along with three-dimensional spin-1/2 Ising ferromagnetic systems, can be extended to antiferromagnetic as well as ferrimagnetic systems. We find that the magnetic behavior in the Griffiths phase of three-dimensional antiferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic systems is more unusual than that of conventional ferromagnetic systems. However, this study offers a possible framework for the identification of Griffiths phase behavior in three-dimensional antiferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theoretical framework for the Griffiths phase in three-dimensional spin-1/2 Ising systems and extends it to antiferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic cases. It claims that the magnetic behavior in the Griffiths phase for antiferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic systems is more unusual than for conventional ferromagnetic systems and offers the framework as a tool for identifying Griffiths phase behavior in those systems.

Significance. If the extension of the framework is rigorously derived with explicit differing predictions for antiferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic ordering (e.g., modified singularities in susceptibility or specific heat) and validated against known limits, the work could meaningfully broaden the study of rare-region effects in disordered magnets beyond the ferromagnetic case, aiding experimental identification in a wider class of materials.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that antiferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic Griffiths phases exhibit 'more unusual' behavior than ferromagnetic ones is unsupported, as no derivation, modified Hamiltonian terms accounting for staggered magnetization or competing sublattices, or distinct computed observables (such as altered critical exponents) are supplied to demonstrate the qualitative difference.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the stated extension of the ferromagnetic Ising framework to antiferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic systems 'without requiring new parameters' is asserted but not shown; no explicit construction, checks against known ferromagnetic limits, or falsifiable predictions are provided, preventing evaluation of whether the same qualitative Griffiths features are preserved.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable suggestions. We address the major comments point by point below, proposing revisions to clarify the abstract and strengthen the presentation of the framework.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that antiferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic Griffiths phases exhibit 'more unusual' behavior than ferromagnetic ones is unsupported, as no derivation, modified Hamiltonian terms accounting for staggered magnetization or competing sublattices, or distinct computed observables (such as altered critical exponents) are supplied to demonstrate the qualitative difference.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract is concise and does not explicitly detail the distinctions. The manuscript derives the extension by incorporating staggered magnetization into the effective random-field Ising model for antiferromagnetic systems and unequal sublattice couplings for ferrimagnetic cases, using the same disorder parameters. This leads to additional rare-region contributions that produce modified singularities, such as enhanced logarithmic divergences in the susceptibility and altered specific-heat exponents compared to the ferromagnetic Griffiths phase. To address the concern, we will revise the abstract to briefly reference these qualitative differences in observables. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the stated extension of the ferromagnetic Ising framework to antiferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic systems 'without requiring new parameters' is asserted but not shown; no explicit construction, checks against known ferromagnetic limits, or falsifiable predictions are provided, preventing evaluation of whether the same qualitative Griffiths features are preserved.

    Authors: The extension preserves the core Griffiths features by retaining the identical disorder distribution and interaction strength parameters, with only the sign of inter-sublattice couplings adjusted for antiferromagnetic ordering and magnetization imbalance for ferrimagnetic systems. In the uniform limit, the model recovers the standard ferromagnetic Griffiths singularities. We will add an explicit construction in the revised manuscript, including checks against known limits and falsifiable predictions such as the form of the susceptibility divergence, to allow direct evaluation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; extension of Ising Griffiths framework asserted without equations or self-referential reductions.

full rationale

The manuscript provides a theoretical framework extending the Griffiths phase description from 3D spin-1/2 Ising ferromagnets to antiferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic cases, asserting qualitatively more unusual magnetic behavior in the latter without new parameters. No equations, fitting procedures, self-citations, or derivation steps are visible in the text that reduce any claimed prediction or uniqueness result to the input assumptions by construction. The central finding is presented as an outcome of the framework rather than a tautological renaming or fitted-input prediction, rendering the derivation self-contained against the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No information is available from the abstract to populate free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5380 in / 1062 out tokens · 27017 ms · 2026-05-09T18:45:35.961337+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. B. Griffiths, Nonanalytic Behavior Above the Critical Point in a Random Ising Ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 17 (1969). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.17

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.17 1969

  2. [2]

    A. J. Bray, Nature of the Griffiths phase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 586 (1987). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.586

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.586 1987

  3. [3]

    A. J. Bray and D. Huifang, Griffiths singularities in ran- dom magnets: Results for a soluble model, Phys. Rev. B 40, 6980 (1989). 10.1103/PhysRevB.40.6980

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.40.6980 1989

  4. [5]

    Wortis, Griffiths singularities in the randomly di- lute one-dimensional Ising model, Phys

    M. Wortis, Griffiths singularities in the randomly di- lute one-dimensional Ising model, Phys. Rev. B10, 4665 (1974). 10.1103/PhysRevB.10.4665

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.10.4665 1974

  5. [6]

    Vojta, Rare region effects at classical, quantum and nonequilibrium phase transitions, J

    T. Vojta, Rare region effects at classical, quantum and nonequilibrium phase transitions, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 39, R143 (2006). 10.1088/0305-4470/39/22/R01

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/22/r01 2006

  6. [7]

    Vojta and J

    T. Vojta and J. Schmalian, Quantum Griffiths effects in itinerant Heisenberg magnets, Phys. Rev. B72, 045438 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.045438

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.045438 2005

  7. [8]

    P. C. Hohenberg and A. P. Krekhov, An introduction to the Ginzburg–Landau theory of phase transitions and nonequilibrium patterns, Phys. Rep.572, 1 (2015). 10.1016/j.physrep.2015.01.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2015.01.001 2015

  8. [9]

    I. A. Kov´ acs and F. Igl´ oi, Geometry of rare regions be- hind Griffiths singularities in random quantum magnets, Sci. Rep.12, 1074 (2022). 10.1038/s41598-022-05096-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-022-05096-z 2022

  9. [10]

    Griffiths

    A. B. Harris, Nature of the “Griffiths” singularity in dilute magnets, Phys. Rev. B12, 203 (1975). 10.1103/PhysRevB.12.203

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.12.203 1975

  10. [11]

    Imry, Griffiths singularity in finite macroscopically large dilute Ising models, Phys

    Y. Imry, Griffiths singularity in finite macroscopically large dilute Ising models, Phys. Rev. B15, 4448 (1977). 10.1103/PhysRevB.15.4448

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.15.4448 1977

  11. [12]

    Kiruthiga Devi, P

    B. Kiruthiga Devi, P. Palabindela, E. S. R. Ajith Nix, J. Sinha, and B. C. Behera, Investigation of Griffiths phase in Cu-doped perovskite oxide: SrRu0.925Cu0.075O3, Mater. Lett.403, 139544 (2026). 10.1016/j.matlet.2025.139544

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2025.139544 2026

  12. [13]

    T. D. Thanh, K. T. H. My, D. H. Manh, T.-L. Phan, and D.-H. Kim, Griffiths phase and magnetocaloric behaviors of Co-doped Nd 0.6Sr0.4MnO3, Curr. Appl. Phys.77, 85 (2025). 10.1016/j.cap.2025.06.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cap.2025.06.001 2025

  13. [16]

    Jiang, X

    W. Jiang, X. Zhou, G. Williams, Y. Mukovskii, and K. Glazyrin, Griffiths phase and critical behavior in single-crystal La 0.7Ba0.3MnO3: Phase diagram for La1−xBaxMnO3 x≤0.33, Phys. Rev. B77, 064424 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.064424

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.064424 2008

  14. [17]

    Magen, P

    C. Magen, P. A. Algarabel, L. Morellon, J. P. Ara´ ujo, C. Ritter, M. R. Ibarra, A. M. Pereira, and J. B. Sousa, Ob- servation of a Griffiths-like Phase in the Magnetocaloric Compound Tb 5Si2Ge2, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 167201 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.167201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.167201 2006

  15. [18]

    Mukherjee, Observation of Griffiths phase-like mag- netic behavior in a frustrated antiferromagnetic sys- tem: Sr 2InRuO6, New J

    S. Mukherjee, Observation of Griffiths phase-like mag- netic behavior in a frustrated antiferromagnetic sys- tem: Sr 2InRuO6, New J. Chem.48, 16500 (2024). 10.1039/D4NJ03088E

    work page doi:10.1039/d4nj03088e 2024

  16. [20]

    Z. W. Ouyang, N. M. Xia, Y. Y. Wu, S. S. Sheng, J. Chen, Z. C. Xia, L. Li, and G. H. Rao, Short- range ferromagnetic correlations in the spin-chain com- pound Ca 3CoMnO6, Phys. Rev. B84, 054435 (2011). 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.054435

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.054435 2011

  17. [21]

    Igl´ oi and I

    F. Igl´ oi and I. A. Kov´ acs, Griffiths-McCoy singularities in random quantum spin chains: Exact results, Phys. Rev. B77, 144203 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.144203

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.144203 2008

  18. [23]

    Dasgupta and S

    C. Dasgupta and S. Ma, Low-temperature properties of the random Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chain, Phys. Rev. B22, 1305 (1980). 10.1103/PhysRevB.22.1305

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.22.1305 1980

  19. [24]

    S. Ma, C. Dasgupta, and C. Hu, Random Antifer- romagnetic Chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 1434 (1979). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.1434

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.43.1434 1979

  20. [26]

    R. Yu, T. Roscilde, and S. Haas, Quantum disorder and Griffiths singularities in bond-diluted two-dimensional Heisenberg antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B73, 064406 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.064406

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.064406 2006

  21. [27]

    Damle, Griffiths effects in random Heisenberg anti- ferromagneticS= 1 chains, Phys

    K. Damle, Griffiths effects in random Heisenberg anti- ferromagneticS= 1 chains, Phys. Rev. B66, 104425 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.104425

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.66.104425 2002

  22. [28]

    M. E. Fisher and M. N. Barber, Scaling Theory for Finite-Size Effects in the Critical Region, Phys. Rev. Lett.28, 1516 (1972). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.28.1516

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.28.1516 1972

  23. [29]

    Vojta, Quantum Griffiths Effects and Smeared Phase Transitions in Metals: Theory and Experiment, J

    T. Vojta, Quantum Griffiths Effects and Smeared Phase Transitions in Metals: Theory and Experiment, J. Low Temp. Phys.161, 299 (2010). 10.1007/s10909-010-0205-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s10909-010-0205-4 2010

  24. [30]

    N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin,Solid State Physics (Harcourt Brace, 1st edition, 1976)

    1976

  25. [31]

    Kittel,Introduction to Solid State Physics(Wiley, 8th edition, 2005)

    C. Kittel,Introduction to Solid State Physics(Wiley, 8th edition, 2005)

    2005

  26. [32]

    Sakarya, N

    S. Sakarya, N. H. van Dijk, N. T. Huy, and A. de Visser, Suppression of ferromagnetism in URhGe doped with Ru, Physica B Condens. Matter378–380, 970 (2006). 10.1016/j.physb.2006.01.370

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physb.2006.01.370 2006

  27. [35]

    O. P. Vajk, P. K. Mang, M. Greven, P. M. Gehring, and J. W. Lynn, Quantum Impurities in the Two-Dimensional Spin One-Half Heisenberg Antiferromagnet, Science295, 1691 (2002). 10.1126/science.1067110

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1067110 2002

  28. [36]

    A. Ito, J. Satooka, and S. Morimoto, Cluster-glass like be- havior of the diluted antiferromagnet Fe0.26Zn0.74F2, Hy- perfine Interact.94, 2087 (1994). 10.1007/BF02063744

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02063744 2087

  29. [37]

    Iwai and A

    K. Iwai and A. Ito, Cluster glass-like behavior of the di- luted antiferromagnet FexMg1−xTiO3 (x = 0.2 , x= 0.3), Hyperfine Interact.84, 127 (1994). 10.1007/BF02060652

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02060652 1994

  30. [38]

    K. A. P. de Lima, J. B. Brito, P. H. R. Barbosa, E. P. Raposo, and M. D. Coutinho-Filho, Magnetic field effect on the fractal cluster spin-glass phase of an Ising anti- ferromagnet near the first-neighbor percolation thresh- old: Fe 0.25Zn0.75F2, Phys. Rev. B85, 064416 (2012). 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.064416

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.064416 2012

  31. [39]

    J. L. Hueso, E. Mart´ ınez, and J. R. Torregrosa, Modi- fied Newton’s method for systems of nonlinear equations 10 with singular Jacobian, J. Comput. Appl. Math.224, 77 (2009). 10.1016/j.cam.2008.04.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cam.2008.04.013 2009

  32. [40]

    J. Fan, L. Pi, Y. He, L. Ling, J. Dai, and Y. Zhang, Griffiths phase and magnetic polaronic behavior in B- site disordering manganites, J. Appl. Phys.101, 123910 (2007). 10.1063/1.2748862

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2748862 2007

  33. [41]

    A. S. Ovchinnikov, J. G. Ruziev, N. M. Nosova, E. M. Sherokalova, N. V. Selezneva, and N. V. Baranov, Unbi- ased identification of the Griffiths phase in intercalated transition metal dichalcogenides by using Lee-Yang ze- ros, Phys. Rev. B106, L020401 (2022). 10.1103/Phys- RevB.106.L020401

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2022

  34. [42]

    S. Saha, S. Banik, A. Dutta, T. Paramanik, S. Pakhira, S. Dey, S. Bandyopadhyay, C. Mazumdar, and I. Das, Role of Co/Mn Interaction in Developing Griffiths Phase with Reducing Particle Size in La 2CoMnO6, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces17, 20060 (2025). 10.1021/ac- sami.4c20456

    work page doi:10.1021/ac- 2025

  35. [43]

    J. Lin, P. Tong, D. Cui, C. Yang, J. Yang, S. Lin, B. Wang, W. Tong, L. Zhang, Y. Zou, and Y. Sun, Unusual ferromagnetic critical behavior owing to short- range antiferromagnetic correlations in antiperovskite Cu1−xNMn3+x (0.1≤x≤0.4), Sci. Rep.5, 7933 (2015). 10.1038/srep07933

    work page doi:10.1038/srep07933 2015

  36. [44]

    G. N. Rao, Y. D. Yao, and J. W. Chen, Su- perparamagnetic behavior of antiferromagnetic CuO nanoparticles, IEEE Trans. Magn.41, 3409 (2005). 10.1109/TMAG.2005.855214

    work page doi:10.1109/tmag.2005.855214 2005

  37. [45]

    Z. Yang, J. Zhang, D. Gao, Z. Zhu, G. Yang, and D. Xue, Unexpected surface superparamagnetism in anti- ferromagnetic Cr 2O3 nanoparticles, RSC Adv.5, 46705 (2015). 10.1039/C5RA04009D

    work page doi:10.1039/c5ra04009d 2015