The proximal point method and its two variants for monotone vector fields in Hadamard spaces
Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 19:36 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
The proximal point method and its variants converge for monotone vector fields in Hadamard spaces.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We prove existence and convergence of sequences generated by the proximal point method and its two variants for monotone vector fields in Hadamard spaces.
Load-bearing premise
The underlying space is Hadamard (complete CAT(0)) and the vector field is monotone, allowing resolvents to be single-valued and the iteration to be well-defined.
read the original abstract
We prove existence and convergence of sequences generated by the proximal point method and its two variants for monotone vector fields in Hadamard spaces. Before obtaining our results, we investigate some fundamental properties of tangent spaces, resolvents, and monotone vector fields in such spaces.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- domain assumption Hadamard spaces are complete CAT(0) metric spaces with unique geodesics
- domain assumption Monotone vector fields admit well-defined resolvents in these spaces
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
Cost.FunctionalEquation; Foundation.LogicAsFunctionalEquationwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
ρ((1−α)x⊕αy, z)^2 ≤ (1−α)ρ(x,z)^2 + αρ(y,z)^2 − α(1−α)ρ(x,y)^2 (CAT(0) inequality 2.4); quasilinearization ⟨xy, zw⟩ = ½(ρ(x,w)^2 + ρ(y,z)^2 − ρ(x,z)^2 − ρ(y,w)^2).
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
B. Ahmadi Kakavandi and M. Amini,Duality and subdifferential for convex functions on completeCAT(0)metric spaces, Nonlinear Anal.73(2010), no. 10, 3450–3455
work page 2010
- [2]
- [3]
-
[4]
D. Ariza-Ruiz, L. Leu¸ stean, and G. L´ opez-Acedo,Firmly nonexpansive mappings in classes of geodesic spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.366(2014), 4299–4322
work page 2014
-
[5]
Baˇ c´ ak,The proximal point algorithm in metric spaces, Israel J
M. Baˇ c´ ak,The proximal point algorithm in metric spaces, Israel J. Math.194(2013), 689– 701
work page 2013
-
[6]
,Convex analysis and optimization in Hadamard spaces, De Gruyter, Berlin, 2014
work page 2014
-
[7]
I. D. Berg and I. G. Nikolaev,Quasilinearization and curvature of Aleksandrov spaces, Geom. Dedicata133(2008), 195–218
work page 2008
-
[8]
H. Br´ ezis and P.-L. Lions,Produits infinis de r´ esolvantes, Israel J. Math.29(1978), 329–345 (French, with English summary)
work page 1978
-
[9]
M. R. Bridson and A. Haefliger,Metric spaces of non-positive curvature, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999. 30 P. CHAIPUNYA AND F. KOHSAKA
work page 1999
- [10]
-
[11]
P. Chaipunya, F. Kohsaka, and P. Kumam,Monotone vector fields and generation of non- expansive semigroups in completeCAT(0)spaces, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim.42(2021), 989–1018
work page 2021
-
[12]
P. Chaipunya and P. Kumam,On the proximal point method in Hadamard spaces, Optimiza- tion66(2017), 1647–1665
work page 2017
-
[13]
J. Jost,Convex functionals and generalized harmonic maps into spaces of nonpositive cur- vature, Comment. Math. Helv.70(1995), 659–673
work page 1995
-
[14]
H. Khatibzadeh and S. Ranjbar,Monotone operators and the proximal point algorithm in completeCat(0)metric spaces, J. Aust. Math. Soc.103(2017), 70–90
work page 2017
-
[15]
Y. Kimura and F. Kohsaka,Two modified proximal point algorithms for convex functions in Hadamard spaces, Linear Nonlinear Anal.2(2016), 69–86
work page 2016
-
[16]
Y. Kimura and S. Saejung,Strong convergence for a common fixed point of two different generalizations of cutter operators, Linear Nonlinear Anal.1(2015), 53–65
work page 2015
-
[17]
W. A. Kirk and B. Panyanak,A concept of convergence in geodesic spaces, Nonlinear Anal. 68(2008), 3689–3696
work page 2008
-
[18]
Kohsaka,Fixed points of metrically nonspreading mappings in Hadamard spaces, Appl
F. Kohsaka,Fixed points of metrically nonspreading mappings in Hadamard spaces, Appl. Anal. Optim.3(2019), 213–230
work page 2019
-
[19]
Martinet,R´ egularisation d’in´ equations variationnelles par approximations successives, Rev
B. Martinet,R´ egularisation d’in´ equations variationnelles par approximations successives, Rev. Fran¸ caise Informat. Recherche Op´ erationnelle4(1970), no. S´ er. R-3, 154–158 (French)
work page 1970
-
[20]
U. F. Mayer,Gradient flows on nonpositively curved metric spaces and harmonic maps, Comm. Anal. Geom.6(1998), 199–253
work page 1998
-
[21]
R. T. Rockafellar,Monotone operators and the proximal point algorithm, SIAM J. Control Optimization14(1976), 877–898
work page 1976
-
[22]
S. Saejung and P. Yotkaew,Approximation of zeros of inverse strongly monotone operators in Banach spaces, Nonlinear Anal.75(2012), 742–750. (P. Chaipunya)Department of Mathematics, F aculty of Science, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, 126 Pracha Uthit Rd., Bang Mod, Thung Khru, Bangkok 10140, Thailand Email address:parin.cha@kmutt.ac.th (...
work page 2012
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.