pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.01719 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-03 · 🪐 quant-ph

Coherence-Preserving Fluctuation Diagnostics for an Engineered Population-Inverted Qubit Otto Engine

Gabriella G. Damas , Norton G. de Almeida , Gao Xianlong , G. D. de Moraes Neto This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords qubit Otto enginepopulation inversionfluctuation diagnosticsdynamic Bayesian networkcoherence preservationquantum thermal machinefinite-time thermodynamicswork fluctuations
0
0 comments X

The pith

A dynamic Bayesian network reconstructs the coherent cycle of a population-inverted qubit Otto engine without measurement dephasing, yielding enhanced work, power, and low-fluctuation sectors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a measurement-backaction-free fluctuation diagnostic for a qubit Otto engine coupled to an actively maintained population-inverted hot channel by using a dynamic Bayesian network to reconstruct the unmeasured coherent cycle. This approach yields statistics for work, heat, power, and a normalized efficiency proxy while avoiding the projective dephasing of conventional two-point energy measurements. In the full-thermalization limit, population inversion increases extracted work and output power and opens a sector of markedly reduced relative power fluctuations. For finite-duration isochores, the enhancements reorganize into distinct high-power, high-efficiency, and low-relative-noise operating regions whose boundaries are set by the competition between nonadiabatic driving and thermalization rates. The method matters because real microscopic engines operate where fluctuations and coherence are comparable to mean performance, yet standard diagnostics destroy the very coherence under study.

Core claim

The central claim is that treating the inverted channel as an active reduced-model resource and reconstructing the unmeasured coherent cycle via dynamic Bayesian network produces work, heat, power, and efficiency-proxy fluctuations without imposing projective dephasing. In the full-thermalization limit population inversion enhances extracted work and output power while opening a stability sector with markedly reduced relative power fluctuations. When finite-duration isochores are used the gross enhancement reorganizes into a structured landscape with distinct high-power, high-efficiency, and low-relative-noise sectors whose boundaries are governed by the competing timescales of nonadiabatic

What carries the argument

Dynamic Bayesian network reconstruction of the unmeasured coherent cycle, which extracts fluctuation statistics from available observations while preserving coherence.

If this is right

  • Population inversion enhances extracted work and output power in the full-thermalization limit.
  • A stability sector opens with markedly reduced relative power fluctuations under population inversion.
  • Finite isochores produce distinct high-power, high-efficiency, and low-relative-noise sectors separated by driving and thermalization timescales.
  • DBN and two-point measurement predictions diverge precisely in coherence-rich regimes.
  • The inverted high-efficiency branch remains aligned with the dominant post-hot-bath coherence ridge while the positive-temperature reference operates near full decoherence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same reconstruction technique could benchmark coherence effects in other quantum thermal machines where direct measurements would destroy the relevant dynamics.
  • Accounting for the energy cost of maintaining the population inversion would convert the reported gross advantages into net device efficiencies and might shift the location of optimal operating sectors.
  • Experimental tuning of bath-coupling times could be used to switch between the high-power and low-noise sectors identified in the finite-time landscape.
  • The divergence between DBN and projective diagnostics supplies a quantitative test for when coherence must be preserved in fluctuation analyses of other finite-time quantum engines.

Load-bearing premise

The dynamic Bayesian network accurately reconstructs the coherent cycle dynamics from the available observations without additional unstated assumptions on the system-bath interactions, and the maintenance cost of sustaining the population inversion is ignored.

What would settle it

An experiment that applies two-point energy measurements to the same engine in a coherence-rich regime and obtains fluctuation statistics that match the DBN predictions would falsify the necessity of a backaction-free reconstruction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.01719 by Gabriella G. Damas, Gao Xianlong, G. D. de Moraes Neto, Norton G. de Almeida.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of the finite-time qubit Otto cycle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparative fluctuation landscape in the ideal-reset regime. The top row corresponds to the population-inverted hot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Finite-time reduced population-inverted engine in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Finite-time operating landscape for the positive-temperature reference case in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Finite-time thermodynamic and coherence landscapes in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Benchmark of the dynamic Bayesian network (DBN) reconstruction against the standard two-point measurement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Finite-time bound diagnostics for the population [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Finite-time quantum thermal machines require diagnostics beyond average work and efficiency, because microscopic engines operate in regimes where fluctuations, incomplete thermalization, and coherence are equally important. Here we develop a measurement-backaction-free (coherence-preserving) fluctuation diagnostic for an engineered qubit Otto engine coupled to an actively maintained population-inverted hot channel. The engine is analyzed using a dynamic Bayesian network (DBN) reconstruction of the unmeasured coherent cycle, yielding work, heat, power, and normalized efficiency-proxy fluctuations without imposing the projective dephasing inherent in two-point energy measurements. The inverted channel is treated as an active reduced-model resource; accordingly, all reported power and efficiency enhancements represent gross working-medium advantages, not net device efficiencies. In the full-thermalization limit, population inversion enhances extracted work and output power while opening a stability sector with markedly reduced relative power fluctuations. When finite-duration isochores are implemented, this gross enhancement reorganizes into a structured operating landscape with distinct high-power, high-efficiency, and low-relative-noise sectors, whose boundaries are governed by the competing timescales of nonadiabatic driving and thermalization rates. A direct comparison reveals that DBN and conventional two-point measurement predictions diverge precisely in coherence-rich regimes, identifying where a backaction-free reconstruction is essential. A coherence-sensitive analysis further shows that the positive-temperature reference operates optimally in an almost decohered region, whereas the inverted high-efficiency branch remains aligned with the dominant post-hot-bath coherence ridge. These results provide a reduced-model benchmarking framework for engineered qubit thermal machines.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a dynamic Bayesian network (DBN) reconstruction to diagnose work, heat, power, and normalized efficiency-proxy fluctuations in a qubit Otto engine coupled to an actively maintained population-inverted hot bath. The DBN is presented as a coherence-preserving alternative to two-point projective energy measurements, avoiding backaction dephasing. In the full-thermalization limit, population inversion is claimed to increase extracted work and output power while opening a low-relative-fluctuation stability sector. For finite isochore durations the operating landscape reorganizes into distinct high-power, high-efficiency, and low-noise sectors whose boundaries are set by the competition between nonadiabatic driving and thermalization rates. Direct comparison shows DBN and two-point predictions diverge precisely in coherence-rich regimes, with the inverted high-efficiency branch remaining aligned with post-hot-bath coherence.

Significance. If the DBN reconstruction is shown to be faithful to the underlying open-system dynamics, the work supplies a concrete benchmarking framework for coherence effects in finite-time quantum thermal machines and identifies a concrete advantage of engineered population inversion for fluctuation suppression. The explicit separation of gross working-medium advantages from net device costs is a useful modeling clarification.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods (DBN model)] Methods section on DBN construction: the graphical model (nodes, edges, conditional probability tables, and assumed Markov order) is not specified in sufficient detail to allow an independent reader to verify that the reconstruction does not implicitly embed a particular bath-correlation function or completeness assumption. Without this, the reported divergence from two-point measurements and the reduction in relative power fluctuations cannot be confirmed to be physical rather than reconstruction artifacts.
  2. [§4 (full-thermalization results)] Results on full-thermalization limit (likely §4): the claimed enhancement of work, power, and fluctuation reduction under population inversion is presented without an explicit cross-validation against the exact Lindblad or non-Markovian master equation for the inverted channel. A direct numerical comparison for at least one parameter set is required to establish that the DBN outputs are not sensitive to the choice of priors or observation model.
  3. [§5 (finite-duration isochores)] Finite-isochore landscape (likely §5): the reorganization into high-power/high-efficiency/low-noise sectors is asserted to be governed by competing timescales, yet no sensitivity analysis is shown for variations in the DBN-inferred thermalization rates or nonadiabaticity parameters. This leaves open whether the sector boundaries are robust or depend on unstated modeling choices.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §2] Notation for the normalized efficiency-proxy should be defined explicitly the first time it appears, including its relation to the standard Otto efficiency.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions for the operating-landscape plots should state the precise parameter values (driving speed, bath rates, inversion strength) used to generate each panel.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for the detailed and insightful report. The comments highlight important aspects for improving the clarity and robustness of our DBN-based fluctuation diagnostics. We address each major comment below, indicating the revisions planned for the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Methods section on DBN construction: the graphical model (nodes, edges, conditional probability tables, and assumed Markov order) is not specified in sufficient detail to allow an independent reader to verify that the reconstruction does not implicitly embed a particular bath-correlation function or completeness assumption. Without this, the reported divergence from two-point measurements and the reduction in relative power fluctuations cannot be confirmed to be physical rather than reconstruction artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that more explicit specification of the DBN graphical model will enhance reproducibility. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the Methods section to detail the nodes as time-discretized qubit density matrix elements, the directed edges representing conditional dependencies consistent with the cycle sequence, the conditional probability tables derived from the reduced open-system dynamics without assuming specific bath correlations beyond the active inverted channel model, and the first-order Markov assumption justified by the separation of timescales. This clarification will confirm that the observed divergences from two-point measurements stem from the coherence-preserving nature of the inference, which is a physical consequence of avoiding projective dephasing, rather than an artifact of the reconstruction. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results on full-thermalization limit (likely §4): the claimed enhancement of work, power, and fluctuation reduction under population inversion is presented without an explicit cross-validation against the exact Lindblad or non-Markovian master equation for the inverted channel. A direct numerical comparison for at least one parameter set is required to establish that the DBN outputs are not sensitive to the choice of priors or observation model.

    Authors: The full-thermalization results are obtained in the limit where the DBN reconstruction converges to the steady-state populations of the inverted channel. However, to directly address the request for cross-validation, we will add in the revised version a comparison for a specific parameter set, solving the Lindblad master equation for the qubit coupled to the inverted bath and comparing the resulting work and power fluctuations with those inferred from the DBN. This will demonstrate consistency within the Markovian regime and confirm that the enhancements and fluctuation reductions are robust to the choice of priors. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Finite-isochore landscape (likely §5): the reorganization into high-power/high-efficiency/low-noise sectors is asserted to be governed by competing timescales, yet no sensitivity analysis is shown for variations in the DBN-inferred thermalization rates or nonadiabaticity parameters. This leaves open whether the sector boundaries are robust or depend on unstated modeling choices.

    Authors: The sector boundaries arise from the interplay between the nonadiabatic driving speed and the thermalization rates extracted from the DBN. We will include in the revised manuscript a sensitivity analysis by varying the DBN-inferred rates and nonadiabatic parameters around their nominal values, showing that the distinct high-power, high-efficiency, and low-relative-noise sectors persist, with boundaries shifting only mildly. This will establish the robustness of the operating landscape to modeling variations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on explicit DBN model and timescale comparisons rather than self-referential reductions.

full rationale

The paper's core chain proceeds from the qubit Otto cycle Hamiltonian and Lindblad-type dynamics (with population-inverted hot bath treated as reduced-model resource) to DBN reconstruction of trajectories, extraction of work/heat/power statistics, and direct numerical comparison against two-point projective measurements. These steps are presented as model outputs under stated Markov assumptions and finite-time isochores; no equation is shown to equal its own input by definition, no fitted parameter is relabeled as an independent prediction, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported solely via self-citation. The reported divergence in coherence-rich regimes and the reorganization into high-power/low-fluctuation sectors follow from the competing rates of nonadiabatic driving versus thermalization, which remain externally falsifiable against the underlying master equation. The explicit caveat that enhancements are gross (maintenance cost ignored) further prevents definitional closure. Hence the derivation chain is self-contained against the model's stated assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that the DBN model faithfully captures the unmeasured coherent dynamics; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The dynamic Bayesian network accurately reconstructs the unmeasured coherent cycle without imposing projective dephasing.
    This is the load-bearing premise enabling the backaction-free diagnostics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5595 in / 1291 out tokens · 71771 ms · 2026-05-10T15:32:19.581764+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alicki and D

    R. Alicki and D. Gelbwaser-Klimovsky, Non-equilibrium quantum heat machines, New Journal of Physics17, 115012 (2015)

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Campisi, P

    M. Campisi, P. Hänggi, and P. Talkner, Colloquium: Quantum fluctuation relations: Foundations and appli- cations, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 771 (2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Roulet,Revealingthe work costof generalized thermal baths, Entropy20, 10.3390/e20120973 (2018)

    A. Roulet,Revealingthe work costof generalized thermal baths, Entropy20, 10.3390/e20120973 (2018)

    work page doi:10.3390/e20120973 2018

  4. [4]

    R. J. de Assis, T. M. de Mendonça, C. J. Villas-Boas, A. M. de Souza, R. S. Sarthour, I. S. Oliveira, and N. G. de Almeida, Efficiency of a quantum otto heat engine operating under a reservoir at effective negative temper- atures, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 240602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    R. Q. Matos, R. J. de Assis, and N. G. de Almeida, Quan- tum otto-type heat engine with fixed frequency, Phys. Rev. E108, 054131 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [8]

    A. Zhou, S. Cheng, and G. Xianlong, Thermodynamic modes of a quasiperiodic mobility-edge system in a quan- tum otto cycle (2026), arXiv:2602.08378 [cond-mat.dis- nn]

    work page arXiv 2026

  7. [9]

    H.-G. Xu, J. Jin, G. D. M. Neto, and N. G. de Almeida, Universal quantum otto heat machine based on the dicke model, Phys. Rev. E109, 014122 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [10]

    H.-G. Xu, J. Jin, N. G. de Almeida, and G. D. d. M. Neto, Exploring the role of criticality in the quantum otto cycle fueled by the anisotropic quantum rabi-stark model, Phys. Rev. B110, 134318 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [11]

    Meng, X.-R

    Z. Meng, X.-R. Fang, J.-Y. Zhang, L.-Y. Cheng, X. Han, H.-F. Wang, and S. Zhang, Quantum otto engine with coherence in cavity quantum electrodynamics, Advanced Quantum Technologies9, e00516 (2026)

    work page 2026

  10. [12]

    S. K. Manikandan, L. Dabelow, R. Eichhorn, and S. Kr- ishnamurthy, Efficiency fluctuations in microscopic ma- chines, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 140601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [13]

    Denzler and E

    T. Denzler and E. Lutz, Efficiency fluctuations of a quan- 19 tum heat engine, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 032062 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [14]

    R. J. De Assis, J. S. Sales, U. C. Mendes, and N. G. de Almeida, Two-level quantum otto heat engine operat- ing with unit efficiency far from the quasi-static regime under a squeezed reservoir, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics54, 095501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [15]

    Denzler, J

    T. Denzler, J. F. G. Santos, E. Lutz, and R. M. Serra, Nonequilibrium fluctuations of a quantum heat engine, Quantum Science and Technology9, 045017 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [16]

    M. F. Anka, T. R. de Oliveira, and D. Jonathan, Work and efficiency fluctuations in a quantum otto cycle with idle levels, Phys. Rev. E109, 064129 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [17]

    A. L. Gramajo, E. Paladino, J. Pekola, and R. Fazio, Fluctuations and stability of a fast-driven otto cycle, Phys. Rev. B107, 195437 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [18]

    T. B. Batalhão, A. M. Souza, L. Mazzola, R. Auccaise, R. S. Sarthour, I. S. Oliveira, J. Goold, G. De Chiara, M. Paternostro, and R. M. Serra, Experimental recon- struction of work distribution and study of fluctuation relations in a closed quantum system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  17. [19]

    Solfanelli, A

    A. Solfanelli, A. Santini, and M. Campisi, Experimen- tal verification of fluctuation relations with a quantum computer, PRX Quantum2, 030353 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [20]

    Talkner, E

    P. Talkner, E. Lutz, and P. Hänggi, Fluctuation theo- rems: Work is not an observable, Physical Review E75, 050102(R) (2007)

    work page 2007

  19. [21]

    Esposito, U

    M. Esposito, U. Harbola, and S. Mukamel, Nonequilib- rium fluctuations, fluctuation theorems, and counting statistics in quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1665 (2009)

    work page 2009

  20. [22]

    Talkner and P

    P. Talkner and P. Hänggi, Aspects of quantum work, Phys. Rev. E93, 022131 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [23]

    Perarnau-Llobet, E

    M. Perarnau-Llobet, E. Baumer, K. V. Hovhannisyan, M.Huber,andA.Acín,No-gotheoremforthecharacteri- zation of work fluctuations in coherent quantum systems, Physical Review Letters118, 070601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [24]

    B.-M. Xu, J. Zou, L.-S. Guo, and X.-M. Kong, Effects of quantum coherence on work statistics, Phys. Rev. A97, 052122 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [25]

    Micadei, G

    K. Micadei, G. T. Landi, and E. Lutz, Quantum fluctu- ation theorems beyond two-point measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 090602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [26]

    Lostaglio, Quantum fluctuation theorems, contextu- ality, and work quasiprobabilities, Phys

    M. Lostaglio, Quantum fluctuation theorems, contextu- ality, and work quasiprobabilities, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 040602 (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [27]

    G. T. Landi, M. J. Kewming, M. T. Mitchison, and P. P. Potts, Current fluctuations in open quantum sys- tems: Bridging the gap between quantum continuous measurements and full counting statistics, PRX Quan- tum5, 020201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [28]

    P. A. Camati, J. F. G. Santos, and R. M. Serra, Coher- ence effects in the performance of the quantum otto heat engine, Physical Review A99, 062103 (2019)

    work page 2019

  27. [29]

    Brandner, M

    K. Brandner, M. Bauer, and U. Seifert, Universal coherence-induced power losses of quantum heat engines in linear response, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 170602 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [30]

    J. P. Santos, L. C. Céleri, G. T. Landi, and M. Paternos- tro, The role of quantum coherence in non-equilibrium entropy production, npj Quantum Information5, 23 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [31]

    Francica, J

    G. Francica, J. Goold, and F. Plastina, Role of coher- ence in the nonequilibrium thermodynamics of quantum systems, Phys. Rev. E99, 042105 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [32]

    Dorner, S

    R. Dorner, S. R. Clark, L. Heaney, R. Fazio, J. Goold, and V. Vedral, Extracting quantum work statistics and fluctuation theorems by single-qubit interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 230601 (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [33]

    Mazzola, G

    L. Mazzola, G. De Chiara, and M. Paternostro, Measur- ing the characteristic function of the work distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 230602 (2013)

    work page 2013

  32. [34]

    Hayashi and H

    M. Hayashi and H. Tajima, Measurement-based formula- tion of quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. A95, 032132 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [35]

    Cerisola, Y

    F. Cerisola, Y. Margalit, S. Machluf, A. J. Roncaglia, J. P. Paz, and R. Folman, Using a quantum work me- ter to test non-equilibrium fluctuation theorems, Nature Communications8, 1241 (2017)

    work page 2017

  34. [36]

    Prasanna Venkatesh, G

    B. Prasanna Venkatesh, G. Watanabe, and P. Talkner, Quantumfluctuationtheoremsandpowermeasurements, New Journal of Physics17, 075018 (2015)

    work page 2015

  35. [37]

    Elouard, D

    C. Elouard, D. A. Herrera-Martí, M. Clusel, and A. Auf- fèves, The role of quantum measurement in stochastic thermodynamics, npj Quantum Information3, 9 (2017)

    work page 2017

  36. [38]

    F. W. J. Hekking and J. P. Pekola, Quantum jump ap- proach for work and dissipation in a two-level system, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 093602 (2013)

    work page 2013

  37. [39]

    Y. V. Nazarov and M. Kindermann, Full counting statis- tics of a general quantum mechanical variable, The Euro- pean Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Com- plex Systems35, 413 (2003)

    work page 2003

  38. [40]

    A. E. Allahverdyan, Nonequilibrium quantum fluctua- tions of work, Phys. Rev. E90, 032137 (2014)

    work page 2014

  39. [41]

    Solinas and S

    P. Solinas and S. Gasparinetti, Full distribution of work done on a quantum system for arbitrary initial states, Phys. Rev. E92, 042150 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [42]

    Solinas and S

    P. Solinas and S. Gasparinetti, Probing quantum inter- ference effects in the work distribution, Phys. Rev. A94, 052103 (2016)

    work page 2016

  41. [43]

    P. P. Hofer and A. A. Clerk, Negative full counting statis- tics arise from interference effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 013603 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [44]

    P. P. Hofer, Quasi-probability distributions for observ- ables in dynamic systems, Quantum1, 32 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [45]

    H. J. D. Miller and J. Anders, Time-reversal symmetric work distributions for closed quantum dynamics in the histories framework, New Journal of Physics19, 062001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [46]

    Lostaglio, A

    M. Lostaglio, A. Belenchia, A. Levy, S. Hernández- Gómez, N. Fabbri, and S. Gherardini, Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability approach to the statistics of incompati- ble observables, Quantum7, 1128 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [47]

    Gherardini, A

    S. Gherardini, A. Belenchia, M. Paternostro, and A. Trombettoni, End-point measurement approach to assess quantum coherence in energy fluctuations, Phys. Rev. A104, L050203 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [48]

    Gherardini and G

    S. Gherardini and G. De Chiara, Quasiprobabilities in quantumthermodynamicsandmany-bodysystems,PRX Quantum5, 030201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [49]

    Micadei, J

    K. Micadei, J. P. S. Peterson, A. M. Souza, R. S. Sarthour, I. S. Oliveira, G. T. Landi, R. M. Serra, and E. Lutz, Experimental validation of fully quantum fluctu- ation theorems using dynamic bayesian networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 180603 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [50]

    Micadei, G

    K. Micadei, G. T. Landi, and E. Lutz, Extracting bayesian networks from multiple copies of a quantum sys- tem, Europhysics Letters144, 60002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [51]

    Strasberg, Operational approach to quantum stochas- 20 tic thermodynamics, Phys

    P. Strasberg, Operational approach to quantum stochas- 20 tic thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. E100, 022127 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [52]

    Strasberg, Thermodynamics of Quantum Causal Mod- els: An Inclusive, Hamiltonian Approach, Quantum4, 240 (2020)

    P. Strasberg, Thermodynamics of Quantum Causal Mod- els: An Inclusive, Hamiltonian Approach, Quantum4, 240 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [53]

    J. J. Park, H. Nha, S. W. Kim, and V. Vedral, Informa- tion fluctuation theorem for an open quantum bipartite system, Phys. Rev. E101, 052128 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [54]

    Zhang, X

    K. Zhang, X. Wang, Q. Zeng, and J. Wang, Conditional entropy production and quantum fluctuation theorem of dissipative information: Theory and experiments, PRX Quantum3, 030315 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [55]

    F. L. S. Rodrigues and E. Lutz, Nonequilibrium thermo- dynamics of quantum coherence beyond linear response, Communications Physics7, 61 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [56]

    Aguilar, F

    M. Aguilar, F. L. S. Rodrigues, and E. Lutz, Minimal- backaction work statistics of coherent engines (2026), arXiv:2603.01962 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  55. [57]

    M. O. Scully, K. R. Chapin, K. E. Dorfman, M. B. Kim, and A. Svidzinsky, Quantum heat engine power can be increased by noise-induced coherence, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences108, 15097 (2011), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1110234108

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1110234108 2011

  56. [58]

    E. M. Purcell and R. V. Pound, A nuclear spin system at negative temperature, Phys. Rev.81, 279 (1951)

    work page 1951

  57. [59]

    N. F. Ramsey, Thermodynamics and statistical mechan- ics at negative absolute temperatures, Phys. Rev.103, 20 (1956)

    work page 1956

  58. [60]

    Struchtrup, Work storage in states of apparent nega- tive thermodynamic temperature, Phys

    H. Struchtrup, Work storage in states of apparent nega- tive thermodynamic temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 250602 (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [61]

    M. L. Bera, T. Pandit, K. Chatterjee, V. Singh, M. Lewenstein, U. Bhattacharya, and M. N. Bera, Steady-state quantum thermodynamics with synthetic negative temperatures, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013318 (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [62]

    G. G. Damas, R. J. de Assis, and N. G. de Almeida, Negative temperature is cool for cooling, Physics Letters A482, 129038 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [63]

    Xi and H.-T

    J.-Y. Xi and H.-T. Quan, Quantum heat engine and neg- ative boltzmann temperature, Communications in Theo- retical Physics68, 347 (2017)

    work page 2017

  62. [64]

    Nettersheim, S

    J. Nettersheim, S. Burgardt, Q. Bouton, D. Adam, E. Lutz, and A. Widera, Power of a quasispin quantum otto engine at negative effective spin temperature, PRX Quantum3, 040334 (2022)

    work page 2022

  63. [65]

    A. F. de Sousa, G. G. Damas, and N. G. de Almeida, En- tropy production and efficiency enhancement in quantum otto engines operating at negative temperatures (2024), arXiv:2404.02385 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [66]

    Rignon-Bret, G

    A. Rignon-Bret, G. Guarnieri, J. Goold, and M. T. Mitchison, Thermodynamics of precision in quantum nanomachines, Phys. Rev. E103, 012133 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [67]

    L. d. S. Souza, G. Manzano, R. Fazio, and F. Iemini, Col- lective effects on the performance and stability of quan- tum heat engines, Phys. Rev. E106, 014143 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [68]

    Saryal and B

    S. Saryal and B. K. Agarwalla, Bounds on fluctuations for finite-time quantum otto cycle, Phys. Rev. E103, L060103 (2021)

    work page 2021

  67. [69]

    K. V. Hovhannisyan and A. Imparato, Energy conserva- tion and fluctuation theorem are incompatible for quan- tum work, Quantum8, 1336 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [70]

    Y. Xiao, D. Liu, J. He, L. Zhuang, W.-M. Liu, L.-L. Yan, and J. Wang, Thermodynamics and fluctuations in finite-time quantum heat engines under reservoir squeez- ing, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043185 (2023)

    work page 2023

  69. [71]

    Jaseem, S

    N. Jaseem, S. Vinjanampathy, and V. Mukherjee, Quadratic enhancement in the reliability of collective quantum engines, Phys. Rev. A107, L040202 (2023)

    work page 2023

  70. [72]

    Fei, J.-F

    Z. Fei, J.-F. Chen, and Y.-H. Ma, Efficiency statistics of a quantum otto cycle, Phys. Rev. A105, 022609 (2022)

    work page 2022

  71. [73]

    Streltsov, G

    A. Streltsov, G. Adesso, and M. B. Plenio, Colloquium: Quantum coherence as a resource, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 041003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  72. [74]

    Baumgratz, M

    T. Baumgratz, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Quantify- ing coherence, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 140401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  73. [75]

    J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, Qutip: An open-source python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications 183, 1760 (2012)

    work page 2012

  74. [76]

    J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, Qutip 2: A python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications184, 1234 (2013)

    work page 2013