pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.01800 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-03 · 💻 cs.SE · cs.ET

Quantum Software Architecture Framework (QSAF): A Component-Based Framework for Designing Hybrid Quantum-Classical Systems

Arvind W. Kiwelekar , Shweta Tembe , Uzma G. A. Munde , Siddhesh Jadhav , Manjushree D. Laddha , Harsha R. Gaikwad This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 17:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SE cs.ET
keywords Quantum software architectureHybrid quantum-classical systemsComponent-based designCircuit primitivesVariational quantum algorithmsSoftware engineeringAbstraction hierarchyDesign trade-offs
0
0 comments X

The pith

The QSAF framework turns 34 quantum circuit primitives into reusable architectural components that link gates to full hybrid system designs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces a component-based framework to shift quantum software work from isolated circuit design toward structured system-level reasoning. It catalogs 34 reusable circuit primitives across seven categories and treats them as components that carry explicit interfaces plus measurable constraints such as depth and error rates. These components sit inside a four-layer hierarchy that runs from individual gates through algorithmic blocks to complete hybrid quantum-classical architectures. The result is a way to break down, compare, and refine workflows like variational quantum algorithms by making design trade-offs visible at each layer.

Core claim

The QSAF framework establishes a multi-level abstraction hierarchy linking quantum gates, circuit primitives, algorithmic structures, and hybrid system architectures. By reinterpreting 34 identified quantum circuit primitives as architectural components equipped with explicit interfaces, design constraints, and non-functional dimensions including circuit depth, error sensitivity, and information flow, the framework supports systematic decomposition, comparison, and optimization of hybrid quantum-classical workflows such as variational quantum algorithms.

What carries the argument

The QSAF multi-level abstraction hierarchy that reinterprets 34 circuit primitives as components with defined interfaces and non-functional properties to connect low-level quantum operations to high-level hybrid architectures.

If this is right

  • Common hybrid workflows can be decomposed into reusable components at multiple abstraction levels rather than rebuilt from gates each time.
  • Design choices become comparable by evaluating the same non-functional dimensions such as error sensitivity across different algorithmic structures.
  • Modular reuse increases because each primitive carries documented interfaces and constraints that survive changes in the surrounding classical control code.
  • Architectural decision-making gains explicit criteria for balancing circuit depth against accuracy requirements in hybrid systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Standardized component catalogs derived from these 34 primitives could support automated verification tools that check interface compatibility across quantum and classical layers.
  • The hierarchy might extend to other quantum paradigms beyond variational methods, such as quantum error correction or annealing schedules, by adding new primitive categories.
  • Adoption would require tool support that maps high-level architecture diagrams directly to executable circuit descriptions, reducing manual translation errors.

Load-bearing premise

Reinterpreting the 34 circuit primitives as components with explicit interfaces and non-functional constraints will produce clearer design trade-offs and greater engineering rigor than existing circuit-centric approaches.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison on a variational quantum eigensolver or similar workflow showing that teams using the QSAF hierarchy produce no measurable improvement in reuse, scalability, or explicit trade-off documentation compared with standard circuit-design methods.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.01800 by Arvind W. Kiwelekar, Harsha R. Gaikwad, Manjushree D. Laddha, Shweta Tembe, Siddhesh Jadhav, Uzma G. A. Munde.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Quantum circuit diagrams for state preparation view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Taxonomy of architectural components in quantum software systems, illustrating reusable circuit view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A Decision-tree for classifying quantum circuit primitives. view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: multilevel Quantum Software Architectural framework (QSAF) for Quantum Software Systems view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: multidimensional classification framework view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Quantum components across five abstraction levels view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum software development has largely focused on algorithms, with limited attention to software architecture. As computing moves toward hybrid quantum-classical systems, this gap limits scalability, reusability, and engineering rigor. This study introduces a component-based quantum software architecture framework (QSAF) for hybrid quantum-classical software systems, enabling developers to transition from circuit-level design to system-level reasoning. We identified 34 reusable quantum circuit primitives across seven functional categories and reinterpreted them as architectural components with explicit interfaces and design-relevant constraints. These components are further characterized using non-functional dimensions such as circuit depth, error sensitivity, and information flow, enabling a structured analysis of design trade-offs. The proposed QSAF framework establishes a multi-level abstraction hierarchy linking quantum gates, circuit primitives, algorithmic structures, and hybrid system architectures. Through this approach, common workflows, particularly hybrid quantum-classical workflows such as variational quantum algorithms, can be systematically decomposed, compared, and optimized. By making the architectural structure and trade-offs explicit, this study provides a foundation for quantum software engineering, supporting modular design, reuse, and informed architectural decision-making in quantum application development.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the Quantum Software Architecture Framework (QSAF), a component-based framework for hybrid quantum-classical software systems. It identifies 34 reusable quantum circuit primitives across seven functional categories, reinterprets them as architectural components with explicit interfaces, design constraints, and non-functional dimensions (e.g., circuit depth, error sensitivity, information flow), and establishes a multi-level abstraction hierarchy from quantum gates to hybrid system architectures. This is claimed to enable systematic decomposition, comparison, and optimization of workflows such as variational quantum algorithms (VQAs), providing a foundation for modular design and reuse in quantum software engineering.

Significance. If the framework's enabling properties were demonstrated through concrete applications, QSAF would represent a meaningful contribution to quantum software engineering by supplying explicit abstraction layers and trade-off dimensions that could support modular design, reuse, and informed decision-making in hybrid systems. The systematic identification and categorization of 34 circuit primitives as reusable components with non-functional attributes is a tangible starting point that could inform future tooling and standardization.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and QSAF Framework Description] The central claim that reinterpreting the 34 primitives as components with interfaces and non-functional dimensions creates a hierarchy that 'enables' systematic decomposition, comparison, and optimization of hybrid workflows (such as VQAs) is unsupported. The manuscript describes the identification and characterization but provides no worked example, before/after comparison, or metric showing that the architectural layer produces design decisions or trade-off analyses that differ from or improve upon standard circuit/algorithmic reasoning.
  2. [Hierarchy and Workflow Application Sections] No concrete application of the multi-level hierarchy is given. For instance, there is no decomposition of a specific VQA workflow into the claimed layers (gates, primitives, algorithmic structures, system architectures) with explicit use of the non-functional dimensions to analyze trade-offs such as depth versus error sensitivity.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Component Characterization] Clarify the exact definitions and quantification methods for the non-functional dimensions (circuit depth, error sensitivity, information flow) when applied to the 34 primitives, as these appear only at a descriptive level.
  2. [Overall Structure] Add a dedicated evaluation or case-study section to ground the claims, as the current presentation remains at the level of framework construction without operational validation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. The comments correctly identify that the manuscript would be strengthened by explicit demonstrations of the framework in use. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate concrete applications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and QSAF Framework Description] The central claim that reinterpreting the 34 primitives as components with interfaces and non-functional dimensions creates a hierarchy that 'enables' systematic decomposition, comparison, and optimization of hybrid workflows (such as VQAs) is unsupported. The manuscript describes the identification and characterization but provides no worked example, before/after comparison, or metric showing that the architectural layer produces design decisions or trade-off analyses that differ from or improve upon standard circuit/algorithmic reasoning.

    Authors: We agree that the current version of the manuscript presents the framework definition, primitive categorization, and non-functional dimensions at a conceptual level without a concrete worked example that illustrates differing design decisions. To address this, we will add a dedicated case-study subsection that applies QSAF to a variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) workflow. The example will include explicit before/after reasoning, showing how the architectural components and trade-off dimensions (e.g., depth versus error sensitivity) guide choices that are not immediately apparent from gate- or algorithm-level analysis alone. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Hierarchy and Workflow Application Sections] No concrete application of the multi-level hierarchy is given. For instance, there is no decomposition of a specific VQA workflow into the claimed layers (gates, primitives, algorithmic structures, system architectures) with explicit use of the non-functional dimensions to analyze trade-offs such as depth versus error sensitivity.

    Authors: This assessment is accurate. The manuscript defines the four-level hierarchy and characterizes the components but does not walk through a full decomposition of any VQA. In the revision we will insert a new workflow-application section that decomposes a hybrid VQA (e.g., VQE for a small Hamiltonian) across all layers, explicitly mapping gates to primitives to algorithmic structures to system architecture and using the non-functional dimensions to quantify and discuss concrete trade-offs such as circuit depth versus error sensitivity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: conceptual framework built from external primitives and standard concepts

full rationale

The paper's derivation consists of identifying 34 quantum circuit primitives from existing literature, reinterpreting them as components with interfaces and non-functional properties drawn from standard software architecture practice, and organizing them into a multi-level hierarchy. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-citations appear in the abstract or described content that would reduce any claim to its own inputs by construction. The hierarchy is presented as an organizational lens rather than a mathematically derived result, making the proposal self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that classical component-based architecture concepts transfer directly to quantum circuits via reinterpretation of primitives, plus the ad-hoc selection of seven categories and 34 primitives without external benchmarks shown in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Quantum circuit primitives can be treated as architectural components with explicit interfaces and design-relevant constraints similar to classical software components.
    This reinterpretation is the foundational step used to build the multi-level hierarchy from the identified primitives.
invented entities (1)
  • QSAF multi-level abstraction hierarchy no independent evidence
    purpose: To link quantum gates, circuit primitives, algorithmic structures, and hybrid system architectures for design trade-off analysis.
    Newly proposed structure introduced to organize the components and workflows.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5537 in / 1334 out tokens · 44863 ms · 2026-05-09T17:10:23.946687+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    & Kiwelekar, A

    Thakare, S. & Kiwelekar, A. Skiplpa: An efficient label propagation algorithm for community detection in sparse network.Proceedings Of The 9th Annual ACM India Conference. pp. 97-106 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    & Joshi, R

    Kiwelekar, A. & Joshi, R. An ontological framework for architecture model integration.Proceedings Of The 4th International Workshop On Twin Peaks Of Requirements And Architecture. pp. 24-27 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    & Kiwelekar, A

    Pantoja Yepez, W., Hurtado Alegria, J., Bandi, A. & Kiwelekar, A. Training software architects suiting software industry needs: A literature review.Education And Information Technologies.29, 10931-10994 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    & Chuang, I

    Martyn, J., Rossi, Z., Tan, A. & Chuang, I. Grand unification of quantum algorithms.PRX Quantum.2, to- wardss2021)

    work page

  5. [5]

    & Buyya, R

    Gill, S., Kumar, A., Singh, H., Singh, M., Kaur, K., Usman, M. & Buyya, R. Quantum computing: A taxonomy, systematic review and future directions.Software: Practice And Experience.52, 66-114 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    & Phadke, S

    Mehta, N., Medvidovic, N. & Phadke, S. towardsss a taxonomy of software connectors.Proceedings Of The 22nd International Conference On Software Engineering. pp. 178-187 (2000)

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    & Chuang, I

    Nielsen, M. & Chuang, I. Quantum computation and quantum information. (Cambridge university press,2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Software architecture in practice

    Bass, L. Software architecture in practice. (Pearson Education India,2012)

    work page 2012

  9. [9]

    & Zurek, W

    Wootters, W. & Zurek, W. A single quantum cannot be cloned.Nature.299, 802-803 (1982)

    work page 1982

  10. [10]

    A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search.Proceedings Of The Twenty-eighth Annual ACM Symposium On Theory Of Computing

    Grover, L. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search.Proceedings Of The Twenty-eighth Annual ACM Symposium On Theory Of Computing. pp. 212-219 (1996)

    work page 1996

  11. [11]

    Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring.Proceedings 35th Annual Sym- posium On Foundations Of Computer Science

    Shor, P. Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring.Proceedings 35th Annual Sym- posium On Foundations Of Computer Science. pp. 124-134 (1994)

    work page 1994

  12. [12]

    & O’brien, J

    Peruzzo, A., McClean, J., Shadbolt, P., Yung, M., Zhou, X., Love, P., Aspuru-Guzik, A. & O’brien, J. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor.Nature Communications.5, 4213 (2014)

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

    Farhi, E., Goldstone, J. & Gutmann, S. A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm. (2014), https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4028

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    & Markov, I

    Shende, V., Bullock, S. & Markov, I. Synthesis of quantum-logic circuits.IEEE Transactions On Computer-Aided Design Of Integrated Circuits And Systems.25, 1000-1010 (2006)

    work page 2006

  15. [15]

    Quantum Software Engineering: Algorithm Development for IBM Quantum Systems.Available at SSRN 5708423

    Khan, J. Quantum Software Engineering: Algorithm Development for IBM Quantum Systems.Available at SSRN 5708423. (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [18]

    & Jha, N

    Lin, C., Chakrabarti, A. & Jha, N. QLib: Quantum module library.J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Syst..11 (2014,10), https://doi.org/10.1145/2629430

    work page doi:10.1145/2629430 2014

  17. [19]

    & Tilkov, S

    Jamshidi, P., Pahl, C., Mendon¸ ca, N., Lewis, J. & Tilkov, S. Microservices: The Journey So Far and Challenges Ahead.IEEE Software.35, 24-35 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [20]

    & Gu´ eh´ eneuc, Y

    Washizaki, H., Uchida, H., Khomh, F. & Gu´ eh´ eneuc, Y. Machine learning architecture and design patterns.IEEE Software.8pp. 2020 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [21]

    & Ayyash, M

    Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M. & Ayyash, M. Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.17, 2347-2376 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [22]

    & Vlissides, J

    Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R. & Vlissides, J. Design Patterns: Abstraction and Reuse of Object-Oriented Design.ECOOP’ 93 — Object-Oriented Programming. pp. 406-431 (1993) 13

    work page 1993

  21. [23]

    & Wille, R

    Gemeinhardt, F., Garmendia, A., Wimmer, M. & Wille, R. A Model-Driven Framework for Composition-Based Quantum Circuit Design.ACM Transactions On Quantum Computing.5(2024,10), https://doi.org/10.1145/3688856

    work page doi:10.1145/3688856 2024

  22. [24]

    Qubit-reuse compilation with mid-circuit measurement and reset,

    DeCross, M., Chertkov, E., Kohagen, M. & Foss-Feig, M. Qubit-Reuse Compilation with Mid-Circuit Measure- ment and Reset.Phys. Rev. X.13, 041057 (2023,12), https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041057

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041057 2023

  23. [25]

    & Zhao, J

    Guo, X., Muta, T. & Zhao, J. Quantum Circuit Ansatz: Patterns of Abstraction and Reuse of Quantum Algorithm Design.2024 IEEE International Conference On Quantum Software (QSW). pp. 69-80 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [26]

    Wu, J., Li, J., Yang, J., Xie, W. & Li, X. CutVQA: Co-Designing Circuit Cutting and Architecture Search for Scaling Variational Quantum Algorithms. (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03376

    work page arXiv 2026

  25. [27]

    & Nowrouzi, K

    Rajagopala, A., Hashim, A., Fruitwala, N., Huang, G., Xu, Y., Hines, J., Siddiqi, I., Klymko, K. & Nowrouzi, K. Hardware-Assisted Parameterized Circuit Execution. (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03725

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [28]

    Platform-agnostic modular architecture for quantum benchmarking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08469, 2025

    Patel, N., Giri, A., Patil, H., Siekierski, N., Chatterjee, A., Johri, S., Proctor, T., Lubinski, T. & Niu, S. Platform- Agnostic Modular Architecture for Quantum Benchmarking. (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08469

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [29]

    & Coffrin, C

    Nagarajan, H., Lockwood, O. & Coffrin, C. QuantumCircuitOpt: An Open-source Framework for Provably Op- timal Quantum Circuit Design.2021 IEEE/ACM Second International Workshop On Quantum Computing Soft- ware (QCS). pp. 55-63 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [30]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.01925 (2022)

    Hua, F., Jin, Y., Chen, Y., Vittal, S., Krsulich, K., Bishop, L., Lapeyre, J., Javadi-Abhari, A. & Zhang, E. Exploiting Qubit Reuse through Mid-circuit Measurement and Reset. (2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.01925

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [31]

    & Chong, F

    Ding, Y., Wu, X., Holmes, A., Wiseth, A., Franklin, D., Martonosi, M. & Chong, F. SQUARE: Strategic Quantum Ancilla Reuse for Modular Quantum Programs via Cost-Effective Uncomputation.2020 ACM/IEEE 47th Annual International Symposium On Computer Architecture (ISCA). pp. 570-583 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [32]

    & Al-Ars, Z

    Krol, A., Mesman, K., Sarkar, A. & Al-Ars, Z. Efficient Parameterised Compilation for Hybrid Quantum Program- ming.2023 IEEE International Conference On Quantum Computing And Engineering (QCE).02pp. 103-111 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [33]

    & Rasch, K

    Wu, X., Premaratne, S. & Rasch, K. A Comprehensive Introduction to the Intel Quantum SDK.Proceedings Of The 2023 Introduction On Hybrid Quantum-Classical Programming Using C++ Quantum Extension. pp. 1-2 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1145/3589014.3595066

    work page doi:10.1145/3589014.3595066 2023

  32. [34]

    Kang, C. & Oh, H. Modular Component-Based Quantum Circuit Synthesis.Proc. ACM Program. Lang..7 (2023,4), https://doi.org/10.1145/3586039

    work page doi:10.1145/3586039 2023

  33. [35]

    Thermal effects and their compen- sation in advanced virgo.Journal of Physics: Confer- ence Series, 363:012016, jun 2012

    Carrazza, S., Efthymiou, S., Lazzarin, M. & Pasquale, A. An open-source modular framework for quan- tum computing.Journal Of Physics: Conference Series.2438, 012148 (2023,2), https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/2438/1/012148

    work page doi:10.1088/1742- 2023

  34. [36]

    & Paler, A

    Dobbs, E., Friedman, J. & Paler, A. Efficient Quantum Circuit Design with a Standard Cell Approach, with an Application to Neutral Atom Quantum Computers.ACM Transactions On Quantum Computing.6(2025,1), https://doi.org/10.1145/3670417

    work page doi:10.1145/3670417 2025

  35. [37]

    & De Micheli, G

    Schmitt, B. & De Micheli, G. tweedledum: A Compiler Companion for Quantum Computing.2022 Design, Automation & Test In Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE). pp. 7-12 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [38]

    & De Baerdemacker, S

    Ghasempouri, S., Dueck, G. & De Baerdemacker, S. Modular Cluster Circuits for the Variational Quantum Eigen- solver.The Journal Of Physical Chemistry A.127, 8168-8178 (2023,10), https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.3c03015

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.3c03015 2023

  37. [39]

    & Pakin, S

    Burgstahler, B., Mueller, F. & Pakin, S. Synthesis of Approximate Parametric Circuits for Variational Quantum Algorithms.2023 IEEE International Conference On Quantum Computing And Engineering (QCE).02pp. 306- 307 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [40]

    & Graziano, M

    Avitabile, M., Cirillo, G., Simoni, M., Turvani, G. & Graziano, M. Development of a multi-technology, template-based quantum circuits compilation toolchain.Quantum Information Processing.21, 379 (2022,11), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-022-03649-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s11128-022-03649-9 2022

  39. [41]

    PRX Quantum , volume =

    Martyn, J., Rossi, Z., Tan, A. & Chuang, I. Grand Unification of Quantum Algorithms.PRX Quantum.2, 040203 (2021,12), https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040203

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.040203 2021

  40. [43]

    Arnault, P

    P. Arnault, P. Arrighi, S. Herbert, E. Kasnetsi, and T. Li, “A typology of quantum algorithms,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.05178, 2024. 14

    work page arXiv 2024