pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.01859 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-03 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Unraveling and controlling the self-assembly pathways of cubic colloids

Dillip Kumar Mohapatra , Teun W.J. Verouden , Janne-Mieke Meijer This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 16:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords colloidal self-assemblycubic particlesdirectional bondinggrowth kineticskinetically arrested statespathway controlanisotropic colloids
0
0 comments X

The pith

Tuning directional bond strength in cubic colloids switches assembly between crystalline growth, dynamic reorganization, and kinetically arrested clusters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that cubic colloids can be guided into different assembly pathways simply by changing how strongly their faces attract. Small-cluster tracking at different attraction levels reveals three regimes: slow reorganization into crystals at weak attraction, faster but still reorganizing growth that produces disordered crystals at medium strength, and frozen disordered clusters at high strength where directional bonds prevent any rearrangement. Because the transitions between regimes are reversible, the work suggests a practical way to select the final order or disorder of the assembled material by external control of attraction.

Core claim

We experimentally demonstrate that tuning the strength of shape-induced directional bonds changes the self-assembly pathways of cubic colloids. By tracking the growth kinetics and internal reorganizations of small clusters at increasing attraction strength, we identify three self-assembly regimes: (i) nucleation and growth regime with slow reorganization-dominated growth of crystalline clusters, (ii) dynamic regime with diffusion-limited growth and dynamic cube reorganizations leading to disordered crystalline clusters, and (iii) static regime with diffusion-limited growth of kinetically arrested clusters unable to reorganize due to directional bonding constraints. We further show that the 3

What carries the argument

Tracking of growth kinetics and internal reorganizations of small clusters while varying attraction strength, which distinguishes the three regimes controlled by directional bonding.

If this is right

  • Transitions between the three regimes can be reversed by decreasing attraction strength to allow reorganization.
  • Pathway selection enables deliberate control over the final degree of crystalline order versus disorder in the assembled material.
  • The same directional-bonding mechanism that arrests clusters at high strength can be used to stabilize reconfigurable colloidal structures.
  • Insights from the regimes apply directly to the rational design of colloidal, nano-, and biomaterials with targeted architectures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the three-regime picture holds for other anisotropic shapes, similar attraction-strength tuning could organize rods or plates into controlled disordered phases.
  • Reversible pathway switching suggests materials that can be dynamically reconfigured by light or temperature triggers that modulate effective bond strength.
  • The static regime may offer a route to glassy or amorphous colloidal solids whose disorder is set by early kinetic arrest rather than by cooling rate.

Load-bearing premise

That the behavior of the tracked small clusters directly captures the dominant early-stage pathways of the entire system and that attraction strength can be varied without other variables such as concentration or temperature altering the outcomes.

What would settle it

An experiment that varies attraction strength across a wide range while holding particle concentration fixed and finds either no distinct regimes or non-reversible transitions between ordered and arrested structures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.01859 by Dillip Kumar Mohapatra, Janne-Mieke Meijer, Teun W.J. Verouden.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a shows six different temperature pathways that were applied to cube dispersion at ϕA = 0.15, together with CLSM images of single clusters with structural as￾signment. All pathways start from ∆T = 0.6 ◦C, where no aggregation is expected, and can be classified into three types: a temperature jump (A1, B1, C1) at t = 0 minutes, a slow temperature ramp (C2, C3) and a mod￾ulated pathway (AM), where the latter… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The self-assembly of anisotropic building blocks into complex spatial architectures is an important design strategy in material science but the mechanisms by which the anisotropic interactions influence the early-stage growth and formation of disordered (non-)equilibrium structures remain poorly understood. Here, we experimentally demonstrate that tuning the strength of shape-induced directional bonds changes the self-assembly pathways of cubic colloids. By tracking the growth kinetics and internal reorganizations of small clusters at increasing attraction strength, we identify three self-assembly regimes: (i) nucleation and growth regime: slow reorganization-dominated growth of crystalline clusters, (ii) dynamic regime: diffusion-limited growth with dynamic cube reorganizations leading to disordered crystalline clusters and (iii) static regime: diffusion-limited growth of kinetically arrested clusters unable to reorganize due to directional bonding constraints. We further show that transitions between these regimes are reversible and allow pathway engineering to control the structure and disorder. Our results reveal how directional bonding governs pathway selection, providing important insights for the rational design of reconfigurable colloidal, nano-, and biomaterials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript experimentally demonstrates that tuning the strength of shape-induced directional bonds in cubic colloids alters their self-assembly pathways. By tracking the growth kinetics and internal reorganizations of small clusters as attraction strength increases, the authors identify three regimes: (i) nucleation and growth with slow reorganization-dominated crystalline clusters, (ii) dynamic regime featuring diffusion-limited growth with dynamic reorganizations yielding disordered crystalline clusters, and (iii) static regime with diffusion-limited growth of kinetically arrested clusters. Transitions between regimes are shown to be reversible, enabling pathway engineering to control structure and disorder.

Significance. If the regime distinctions hold under rigorous controls, the work would advance understanding of how anisotropic directional bonding selects among nucleation, dynamic, and arrested pathways in colloidal systems. The experimental observation of reversible transitions between regimes is a notable strength, offering a practical route to reconfigurable assembly. Direct tracking of small-cluster dynamics provides a valuable window into early-stage non-equilibrium processes relevant to colloidal, nano-, and biomaterials design.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The three-regime classification rests on qualitative descriptions of cluster growth kinetics and reorganizations, with no reported quantitative data such as growth rates, reorganization frequencies, error bars, or sample sizes. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as it leaves the robustness of the regime boundaries and their distinction from one another under-supported.
  2. [Experimental section] Experimental section: The manuscript does not state whether particle concentration (volume fraction) was held fixed while varying attraction strength. Since volume fraction independently governs the crossover between diffusion-limited and reaction-limited aggregation, any confounding from depletant concentration or temperature changes would undermine the attribution of pathway selection solely to directional bonding constraints.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for recognizing the potential significance of our work on pathway selection in cubic colloid self-assembly. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The three-regime classification rests on qualitative descriptions of cluster growth kinetics and reorganizations, with no reported quantitative data such as growth rates, reorganization frequencies, error bars, or sample sizes. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as it leaves the robustness of the regime boundaries and their distinction from one another under-supported.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on quantitative support for the regime distinctions. The main text and figures already contain quantitative elements, including time-dependent cluster size data used to extract growth kinetics, counts of reorganization events per unit time from particle tracking, and statistical measures across repeated experiments. However, we agree that these are not sufficiently highlighted in the abstract or summarized with explicit values, error bars, and sample sizes. In the revision we will expand the abstract to reference the key quantitative metrics distinguishing the regimes and add a concise summary table or supplementary figure compiling growth rates, reorganization frequencies, and associated statistics with error bars and sample sizes (n ≥ 8 per condition). revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experimental section] Experimental section: The manuscript does not state whether particle concentration (volume fraction) was held fixed while varying attraction strength. Since volume fraction independently governs the crossover between diffusion-limited and reaction-limited aggregation, any confounding from depletant concentration or temperature changes would undermine the attribution of pathway selection solely to directional bonding constraints.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies a point that requires clarification. The particle volume fraction was held fixed at φ = 0.05 in all experiments while attraction strength was tuned solely through depletant concentration at constant temperature. This protocol is described in the Experimental Methods but is not stated with sufficient prominence. We will revise the Experimental section to include an explicit statement: 'All measurements were performed at a fixed particle volume fraction of φ = 0.05; attraction strength was varied independently by adjusting depletant concentration while holding temperature constant.' We will also note that control measurements confirmed the effective volume fraction remains unchanged across the depletant range used. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims rest on direct experimental observations of cluster kinetics.

full rationale

The paper presents an experimental study identifying three self-assembly regimes for cubic colloids by varying attraction strength and tracking small-cluster growth kinetics and reorganizations. No mathematical derivations, equations, parameter fittings, or predictions are described that could reduce to inputs by construction. Regime identification follows from observed behaviors (slow reorganization, dynamic reorganizations, kinetic arrest) without self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks as empirical mapping from controlled experiments, with no evidence of circular reduction in the provided abstract or described methodology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work is experimental and relies on standard assumptions of colloidal physics without introducing new free parameters or entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Shape-induced directional bonds dominate interactions between anisotropic colloids
    This is a standard premise in studies of non-spherical particle assembly.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5485 in / 1072 out tokens · 58132 ms · 2026-05-09T16:26:40.167429+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G. M. Whitesides and B. Grzybowski, Self-Assembly at All Scales, Science295, 2418 (2002)

    2002

  2. [2]

    V. N. Manoharan, Colloidal matter: Packing, geometry, and entropy, Science349, 1253751 (2015)

    2015

  3. [3]

    M. A. Boles, M. Engel, and D. V. Talapin, Self-Assembly of Colloidal Nanocrystals: From Intricate Structures to Functional Materials, Chemical Reviews116, 11220 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    Z. Li, Q. Fan, and Y. Yin, Colloidal Self-Assembly Ap- proaches to Smart Nanostructured Materials, Chemical Reviews122, 4976 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    K. Zhou, S. Hoshika, J. Cheng, C. Lin, S. Ben- ner, and Y. Ke, Expanding dna alphabet adds a previously unknown dimension to nanostruc- tures, Science Advances12, eaeb6713 (2026), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.aeb6713

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aeb6713 2026

  6. [6]

    W. Zhou, Y. Li, K. Je, T. Vo, H. Lin, B. E. Partridge, Z. Huang, S. C. Glotzer, and C. A. Mirkin, Space-tiled colloidal crystals from dna-forced shape-complementary polyhedra pairing, Science383, 312 (2024), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.adj1021

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adj1021 2024

  7. [7]

    J. J. McManus, P. Charbonneau, E. Zaccarelli, and N. Asherie, The physics of protein self-assembly, Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science22, 73 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Hueckel, G

    T. Hueckel, G. M. Hocky, and S. Sacanna, Total synthesis of colloidal matter, Nature Reviews Materials6, 1053 (2021)

    2021

  9. [9]

    Kim, J.-B

    Y.-J. Kim, J.-B. Moon, H. Hwang, Y. S. Kim, and G.-R. Yi, Advances in colloidal building blocks: To- ward patchy colloidal clusters, Advanced Materials35, 2203045 (2023)

    2023

  10. [10]

    P. F. Damasceno, M. Engel, and S. C. Glotzer, Predic- tive Self-Assembly of Polyhedra into Complex Structures, Science337, 453 (2012)

    2012

  11. [11]

    B. Li, D. Zhou, and Y. Han, Assembly and phase tran- sitions of colloidal crystals, Nature Reviews Materials1, 15011 (2016)

    2016

  12. [12]

    Torquato, Perspective: Basic understanding of con- 10 densed phases of matter via packing models, The Journal of Chemical Physics149, 020901 (2018)

    S. Torquato, Perspective: Basic understanding of con- 10 densed phases of matter via packing models, The Journal of Chemical Physics149, 020901 (2018)

    2018

  13. [13]

    Dijkstra and E

    M. Dijkstra and E. Luijten, From predictive modelling to machine learning and reverse engineering of colloidal self-assembly, Nature Materials20, 762 (2021)

    2021

  14. [14]

    Haji-Akbari, M

    A. Haji-Akbari, M. Engel, A. S. Keys, X. Zheng, R. G. Petschek, P. Palffy-Muhoray, and S. C. Glotzer, Disor- dered, quasicrystalline and crystalline phases of densely packed tetrahedra, Nature462, 773 (2009)

    2009

  15. [15]

    E. G. Noya, C. K. Wong, P. Llombart, and J. P. K. Doye, How to design an icosahedral quasicrystal through direc- tional bonding, Nature596, 367371 (2021)

    2021

  16. [16]

    M. He, J. P. Gales, . Ducrot, Z. Gong, G.-R. Yi, S. Sacanna, and D. J. Pine, Colloidal diamond, Nature 585, 524 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    Neophytou, V

    A. Neophytou, V. N. Manoharan, and D. Chakrabarti, Self-assembly of patchy colloidal rods into photonic crys- tals robust to stacking faults, ACS Nano15, 2668 (2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    F. Li, D. P. Josephson, and A. Stein, Colloidal Assem- bly: The Road from Particles to Colloidal Molecules and Crystals, Angewandte Chemie International Edition50, 360 (2011)

    2011

  19. [19]

    M. I. Bodnarchuk, E. V. Shevchenko, and D. V. Talapin, Structural Defects in Periodic and Quasicrystalline Bi- nary Nanocrystal Superlattices, Journal of the American Chemical Society133, 20837 (2011)

    2011

  20. [20]

    Von Freymann, V

    G. Von Freymann, V. Kitaev, B. V. Lotsch, and G. A. Ozin, Bottom-up assembly of photonic crystals, Chem. Soc. Rev.42, 2528 (2013)

    2013

  21. [21]

    Serafin, J

    F. Serafin, J. Lu, N. Kotov, K. Sun, and X. Mao, Frustrated self-assembly of non-Euclidean crystals of nanoparticles, Nature Communications12, 4925 (2021)

    2021

  22. [22]

    Cardinaux, T

    F. Cardinaux, T. Gibaud, A. Stradner, and P. Schurten- berger, Interplay between Spinodal Decomposition and Glass Formation in Proteins Exhibiting Short-Range At- tractions, Physical Review Letters99, 118301 (2007)

    2007

  23. [23]

    Fusco and P

    D. Fusco and P. Charbonneau, Soft matter perspective on protein crystal assembly, Colloids and Surfaces B: Bioin- terfaces137, 22 (2016)

    2016

  24. [24]

    C. P. Royall, M. A. Faers, S. L. Fussell, and J. E. Hal- lett, Real space analysis of colloidal gels: triumphs, chal- lenges and future directions, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter33, 453002 (2021)

    2021

  25. [25]

    Henzie, M

    J. Henzie, M. Grnwald, A. Widmer-Cooper, P. L. Geissler, and P. Yang, Self-assembly of uniform polyhe- dral silver nanocrystals into densest packings and exotic superlattices, Nature Materials11, 131 (2012)

    2012

  26. [26]

    K. Zhao, R. Bruinsma, and T. G. Mason, Entropic crys- talcrystal transitions of Brownian squares, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences108, 2684 (2011)

    2011

  27. [27]

    Rossi, V

    L. Rossi, V. Soni, D. J. Ashton, D. J. Pine, A. P. Philipse, P. M. Chaikin, M. Dijkstra, S. Sacanna, and W. T. M. Irvine, Shape-sensitive crystallization in colloidal super- ball fluids, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences112, 5286 (2015)

    2015

  28. [28]

    Meijer, A

    J.-M. Meijer, A. Pal, S. Ouhajji, H. N. W. Lekkerkerker, A. P. Philipse, and A. V. Petukhov, Observation of solid- solid transitions in 3D crystals of colloidal superballs, Nature Communications8, 14352 (2017)

    2017

  29. [29]

    J. J. Geuchies, C. Van Overbeek, W. H. Evers, B. Goris, A. De Backer, A. P. Gantapara, F. T. Rabouw, J. Hil- horst, J. L. Peters, O. Konovalov, A. V. Petukhov, M. Dijkstra, L. D. A. Siebbeles, S. Van Aert, S. Bals, and D. Vanmaekelbergh, In situ study of the formation mechanism of two-dimensional superlattices from PbSe nanocrystals, Nature Materials15, 1...

    2016

  30. [30]

    F. Lu, T. Vo, Y. Zhang, A. Frenkel, K. G. Yager, S. Kumar, and O. Gang, Unusual packing of soft-shelled nanocubes, Science Advances5, eaaw2399 (2019), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.aaw2399

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw2399 2019

  31. [31]

    R. D. Batten, F. H. Stillinger, and S. Torquato, Phase behavior of colloidal superballs: Shape interpolation from spheres to cubes, Physical Review E81, 061105 (2010)

    2010

  32. [32]

    R. Ni, A. P. Gantapara, J. De Graaf, R. Van Roij, and M. Dijkstra, Phase diagram of colloidal hard superballs: from cubes via spheres to octahedra, Soft Matter8, 8826 (2012)

    2012

  33. [33]

    Avendao and F

    C. Avendao and F. A. Escobedo, Phase behavior of rounded hard-squares, Soft Matter8, 4675 (2012)

    2012

  34. [34]

    Lffler, L

    R. Lffler, L. Siedentop, and P. Keim, Tetratic phase in 2D crystals of squares, Soft Matter21, 2026 (2025)

    2026

  35. [35]

    Rossi, S

    L. Rossi, S. Sacanna, W. T. M. Irvine, P. M. Chaikin, D. J. Pine, and A. P. Philipse, Cubic crystals from cubic colloids, Soft Matter7, 4139 (2011)

    2011

  36. [36]

    Y. Wang, Y. Zhou, Q. Yang, R. Basak, Y. Xie, D. Le, A. D. Fuqua, W. Shipley, Z. Yam, A. Frano, G. Arya, and A. R. Tao, Self-assembly of nanocrystal checkerboard patterns via non-specific interactions, Nature Communi- cations15, 3913 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Z. Quan, H. Xu, C. Wang, X. Wen, Y. Wang, J. Zhu, R. Li, C. J. Sheehan, Z. Wang, D.-M. Smilgies, Z. Luo, and J. Fang, Solvent-Mediated Self-Assembly of Nanocube Superlattices, Journal of the American Chem- ical Society136, 1352 (2014)

    2014

  38. [38]

    Brunner, I

    J. Brunner, I. A. Baburin, S. Sturm, K. Kvashn- ina, A. Rossberg, T. Pietsch, S. Andreev, E. Sturm (Ne Rosseeva), and H. Clfen, SelfAssembled Magnetite Mesocrystalline Films: Toward Structural Evolution from 2D to 3D Superlattices, Advanced Materials Inter- faces4, 1600431 (2017)

    2017

  39. [39]

    Meijer, V

    J.-M. Meijer, V. Meester, F. Hagemans, H. Lekkerkerker, A. P. Philipse, and A. V. Petukhov, Convectively Assem- bled Monolayers of Colloidal Cubes: Evidence of Optimal Packings, Langmuir35, 4946 (2019)

    2019

  40. [40]

    Cimada daSilva, D

    J. Cimada daSilva, D. M. Balazs, T. A. Dunbar, and T. Hanrath, Fundamental Processes and Practical Con- siderations of Lead Chalcogenide Mesocrystals Formed via Self-Assembly and Directed Attachment of Nanocrys- tals at a Fluid Interface, Chemistry of Materials33, 9457 (2021)

    2021

  41. [41]

    J. S. Van Der Burgt, J. J. Geuchies, B. Van Der Meer, H. Vanrompay, D. Zanaga, Y. Zhang, W. Albrecht, A. V. Petukhov, L. Filion, S. Bals, I. Swart, and D. Vanmaekel- bergh, Cuboidal Supraparticles Self-Assembled from Cu- bic CsPbBr 3 Perovskite Nanocrystals, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C122, 15706 (2018)

    2018

  42. [42]

    Smallenburg, L

    F. Smallenburg, L. Filion, M. Marechal, and M. Dijkstra, Vacancy-stabilized crystalline order in hard cubes, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109, 17886 (2012)

    2012

  43. [43]

    Baldauf, E

    L. Baldauf, E. G. Teich, P. Schall, G. van Anders, and L. Rossi, Shape and interaction decoupling for colloidal preassembly, Science Advances8, eabm0548 (2022), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.abm0548

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm0548 2022

  44. [44]

    Zhong, T

    Y. Zhong, T. C. Moore, T. Dwyer, A. Butrum-Griffith, V. R. Allen, J. Chen, Y. Wang, F. Cheng, S. C. Glotzer, and X. Ye, Engineering and direct imaging of nanocube self-assembly pathways, Nature Chemical Engineering1, 11 532 (2024)

    2024

  45. [45]

    B. Luo, Z. Wang, T. Curk, G. Watson, C. Liu, A. Kim, Z. Ou, E. Luijten, and Q. Chen, Unravelling crystal growth of nanoparticles, Nature Nanotechnology18, 589 (2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    Hertlein, L

    C. Hertlein, L. Helden, A. Gambassi, S. Dietrich, and C. Bechinger, Direct measurement of critical Casimir forces, Nature451, 172 (2008)

    2008

  47. [47]

    Gambassi and S

    A. Gambassi and S. Dietrich, Critical Casimir forces in soft matter, Soft Matter20, 3212 (2024)

    2024

  48. [48]

    V. D. Nguyen, M. T. Dang, T. A. Nguyen, and P. Schall, Critical Casimir forces for colloidal assembly, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter28, 043001 (2016)

    2016

  49. [49]

    Rouwhorst, C

    J. Rouwhorst, C. Ness, S. Stoyanov, A. Zaccone, and P. Schall, Nonequilibrium continuous phase transition in colloidal gelation with short-range attraction, Nature Communications11, 3558 (2020)

    2020

  50. [50]

    P. J. M. Swinkels, Z. Gong, S. Sacanna, E. G. Noya, and P. Schall, Visualizing defect dynamics by assembling the colloidal graphene lattice, Nature Communications14, 1524 (2023)

    2023

  51. [51]

    Swinkels, R

    P. Swinkels, R. Sinaasappel, Z. Gong, S. Sacanna, W. Meyer, F. Sciortino, and P. Schall, Networks of Limited-Valency Patchy Particles, Physical Review Let- ters132, 078203 (2024)

    2024

  52. [52]

    C. L. Kennedy, D. Sayasilpi, P. Schall, and J.-M. Meijer, Self-assembly of colloidal cube superstructures with crit- ical Casimir attractions, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter34, 214005 (2022)

    2022

  53. [53]

    Y. Jiao, F. H. Stillinger, and S. Torquato, Optimal Pack- ings of Superdisks and the Role of Symmetry, Physical Review Letters100, 245504 (2008)

    2008

  54. [54]

    M. Y. Lin, H. M. Lindsay, D. A. Weitz, R. C. Ball, R. Klein, and P. Meakin, Universality in colloid aggre- gation, Nature339, 360 (1989)

    1989

  55. [55]

    P. J. Lu, E. Zaccarelli, F. Ciulla, A. B. Schofield, F. Sciortino, and D. A. Weitz, Gelation of particles with short-range attraction, Nature453, 499 (2008)

    2008

  56. [56]

    D. J. Robinson and J. C. Earnshaw, Experimental study of colloidal aggregation in two dimensions. I. Structural aspects, Physical Review A46, 2045 (1992)

    2045

  57. [57]

    Moncho-Jord´ a, G

    A. Moncho-Jord´ a, G. Odriozola, F. Martınez-L´ opez, A. Schmitt, and R. Hidalgo- ´Alvarez, The dlca-rlca tran- sition arising in 2d-aggregation: simulations and mean field theory, The European Physical Journal E5, 471 (2001)

    2001

  58. [58]

    Friedlander and C

    S. Friedlander and C. Wang, The self-preserving parti- cle size distribution for coagulation by brownian motion, Journal of Colloid and interface Science22, 126 (1966)

    1966

  59. [59]

    B. R. Argun and A. Statt, Influence of shape on heteroag- gregation of model microplastics: a simulation study, Soft Matter19, 8081 (2023)

    2023

  60. [60]

    Ginot, I

    F. Ginot, I. Theurkauff, F. Detcheverry, C. Ybert, and C. Cottin-Bizonne, Aggregation-fragmentation and indi- vidual dynamics of active clusters, Nature Communica- tions9, 696 (2018)

    2018

  61. [61]

    Cheng, Colloidal crystallization, inFluids, Colloids and Soft Materials(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2016) Chap

    Z. Cheng, Colloidal crystallization, inFluids, Colloids and Soft Materials(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2016) Chap. 12, pp. 203–248

    2016

  62. [62]

    P. J. M. Swinkels, Z. Gong, S. Sacanna, E. G. Noya, and P. Schall, Phases of surface-confined trivalent colloidal particles, Soft Matter19, 3414 (2023)

    2023

  63. [63]

    Chakraborty, V

    I. Chakraborty, V. Meester, C. Van Der Wel, and D. J. Kraft, Colloidal joints with designed motion range and tunable joint flexibility, Nanoscale9, 7814 (2017)

    2017

  64. [64]

    Shelke, F

    Y. Shelke, F. Camerin, S. Marn-Aguilar, R. W. Verweij, M. Dijkstra, and D. J. Kraft, Flexible Colloidal Molecules with Directional Bonds and Controlled Flexibility, ACS Nano17, 12234 (2023)

    2023

  65. [65]

    F. M. Gartner and E. Frey, Design Principles for Fast and Efficient Self-Assembly Processes, Physical Review X14, 021004 (2024)

    2024

  66. [66]

    Sugimoto and K

    T. Sugimoto and K. Sakata, Preparation of monodisperse pseudocubic -Fe2O3 particles from condensed ferric hy- droxide gel, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science152, 587 (1992)

    1992

  67. [67]

    C. Graf, D. L. J. Vossen, A. Imhof, and A. Van Blaaderen, A General Method To Coat Colloidal Particles with Sil- ica, Langmuir19, 6693 (2003)

    2003

  68. [68]

    Meijer,Colloidal Crystals of Spheres and Cubes in Real and Reciprocal Space, Springer Theses (Springer In- ternational Publishing, Cham, 2015)

    J.-M. Meijer,Colloidal Crystals of Spheres and Cubes in Real and Reciprocal Space, Springer Theses (Springer In- ternational Publishing, Cham, 2015)

    2015

  69. [69]

    D. B. Allan, T. Caswell, N. C. Keim, C. M. van der Wel, and R. W. Verweij, soft-matter/trackpy: Trackpy v0.5.0, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4682814(2021)

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.4682814(2021 2021

  70. [70]

    Ramasubramani, B

    V. Ramasubramani, B. D. Dice, E. S. Harper, M. P. Spellings, J. A. Anderson, and S. C. Glotzer, freud: A software suite for high throughput analysis of parti- cle simulation data, Computer Physics Communications 254, 107275 (2020). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors thank Paul P.A.M. van der Schoot and Liesbeth M. C. Janssen for insightful discussions and crit-...

    2020