pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.02004 · v2 · submitted 2026-05-03 · 💻 cs.AI

Personalized Digital Health Modeling with Adaptive Support Users

Zhongqi Yang , Mahkameh Rasouli , Neda Mohseni , Yong Huang , Iman Azimi , Amir M. Rahmani This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 06:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI
keywords personalized modelingdigital healthadaptive support userscontrastive regularizationsimilarity weightinghealth predictionuser heterogeneitylow-data personalization
0
0 comments X

The pith

A unified framework trains personal digital health models by adaptively weighting support users that include both similar and dissimilar individuals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper addresses the challenge of scarce and noisy individual data in digital health by proposing a personalization method that draws from a broader pool of users rather than restricting transfer to similar ones only. It combines a user's own loss with weighted contributions from similar users and contrastive regularization from dissimilar users to reduce misleading correlations. An iterative algorithm updates both the model and the similarity weights jointly. Experiments across six tasks and four real-world datasets demonstrate lower prediction errors than population-level and standard personalized baselines, with gains reaching 10 percent RMSE reduction on large datasets and 25 percent in low-data regimes. The learned weights also improve data efficiency and yield interpretable signals for selecting relevant data sources.

Core claim

Training a personal model with an objective that integrates personal loss, similarity-weighted transfer from similar users, and contrastive regularization from dissimilar users, optimized through iterative joint updates of parameters and weights, produces more accurate and data-efficient personalized predictions on digital health tasks than methods relying solely on population pretraining or similar-user transfer.

What carries the argument

Adaptive weighting of support users that incorporates contrastive regularization from dissimilar individuals to suppress misleading correlations while preserving useful transfer signals.

If this is right

  • The method yields consistent accuracy gains over both population and standard personalized baselines across multiple health prediction tasks.
  • Error reductions reach approximately 10 percent RMSE on large-scale datasets and 25 percent in low-data regimes.
  • The learned adaptive weights increase data efficiency by highlighting which external records are most useful for a given user.
  • The weights provide interpretable guidance that can direct targeted collection of additional user data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same adaptive-plus-contrastive structure could be tested in other heterogeneous data settings such as personalized recommendation or clinical trial matching.
  • If the weights prove stable across time, they might support ongoing model updates without full retraining when new users join a platform.
  • The approach implies that deliberately including negative examples during personalization can be beneficial rather than purely harmful, provided the regularization is tuned jointly with the model.

Load-bearing premise

Contrastive regularization drawn from dissimilar users will suppress misleading correlations without introducing new biases that harm performance on the target user's own data.

What would settle it

A test set where performance on a held-out user's data degrades below the similar-user-only baseline after adding the contrastive term from dissimilar users, indicating the regularization failed to avoid harmful negative transfer.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.02004 by Amir M. Rahmani, Iman Azimi, Mahkameh Rasouli, Neda Mohseni, Yong Huang, Zhongqi Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The personal model is built for each user through three stages: (1) user similarity initialization, (2) personalized loss construction view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Relative model performance across tasks when varying the percentage of users used for training. view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison between learned weights and initial similarity view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Personalized models are essential in digital health because individuals exhibit substantial physiological and behavioral heterogeneity. Yet personalization is limited by scarce and noisy user-specific data. Most existing methods rely on population pretraining or data from similar users only, which can lead to biased transfer and weak generalization. We propose a unified personalization framework that trains a personal model using adaptively weighted support users, including both similar and dissimilar individuals. The objective integrates personal loss, similarity-weighted transfer from similar users, and contrastive regularization from dissimilar users to suppress misleading correlations. An iterative optimization algorithm jointly updates model parameters and user similarity weights. Experiments on six tasks across four real-world digital health datasets show consistent improvements over population and personalized baselines. The method achieves up to 10% lower RMSE on large-scale datasets and approximately 25% lower RMSE in low-data settings. The learned adaptive weights improve data efficiency and provide interpretable guidance for targeted data selection.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a unified personalization framework for digital health that trains personal models using adaptively weighted support users (both similar and dissimilar). The objective combines personal loss, similarity-weighted transfer, and contrastive regularization from dissimilar users to suppress misleading correlations; an iterative algorithm jointly optimizes model parameters and user similarity weights. Experiments on six tasks across four real-world datasets report consistent gains over population and personalized baselines, with up to 10% lower RMSE on large-scale data and ~25% lower RMSE in low-data regimes, plus improved data efficiency via interpretable weights.

Significance. If the reported gains are confirmed with full experimental controls, the method would offer a practical advance in handling data scarcity and heterogeneity in digital health, by leveraging both positive and negative transfer while yielding interpretable user weights for targeted data selection.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Experiments] Abstract and Experiments section: the central empirical claims (10% and 25% RMSE reductions) are presented without reported statistical significance tests, exact baseline definitions, data-split protocols, or ablation results isolating the contrastive term; these omissions prevent verification of the low-data-regime gains.
  2. [Method] Method section (iterative optimization): no convergence analysis, fixed-point guarantees, or bias bounds are supplied for the joint update of parameters and similarity weights; this leaves the key assumption—that contrastive regularization from dissimilar users reliably suppresses misleading correlations without harming target-user generalization—unverified, especially in high-dimensional noisy digital-health data.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Method] Notation for the contrastive regularization term and the adaptive weight update rule could be made more explicit to aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below, indicating where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Experiments] Abstract and Experiments section: the central empirical claims (10% and 25% RMSE reductions) are presented without reported statistical significance tests, exact baseline definitions, data-split protocols, or ablation results isolating the contrastive term; these omissions prevent verification of the low-data-regime gains.

    Authors: We agree that these details are essential for verifying the empirical claims. In the revised manuscript, we will report statistical significance tests (such as paired t-tests with p-values) for the RMSE reductions, provide exact definitions of all baselines and data-split protocols in the Experiments section, and include an ablation study isolating the contrastive regularization term. These additions will strengthen the presentation of the low-data-regime results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Method] Method section (iterative optimization): no convergence analysis, fixed-point guarantees, or bias bounds are supplied for the joint update of parameters and similarity weights; this leaves the key assumption—that contrastive regularization from dissimilar users reliably suppresses misleading correlations without harming target-user generalization—unverified, especially in high-dimensional noisy digital-health data.

    Authors: We acknowledge the lack of formal analysis. We will add empirical convergence plots showing objective values over iterations and a discussion of observed stability across datasets in the revised Method section. However, deriving fixed-point guarantees or bias bounds for the joint optimization in high-dimensional settings requires substantial new theoretical work beyond the current scope. We will clarify the modeling assumptions and note this as a limitation. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Formal convergence analysis, fixed-point guarantees, or bias bounds for the iterative joint optimization of parameters and similarity weights

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; empirical method with iterative fitting validated on external datasets.

full rationale

The paper presents an empirical personalization framework whose core is an iterative joint optimization of model parameters and adaptive user similarity weights, trained on real-world digital health datasets. Performance claims (RMSE reductions) are measured against held-out test data and baselines, not derived by construction from the inputs. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-definition, a fitted quantity renamed as prediction, or a self-citation chain; the contrastive regularization term is an explicit modeling choice whose effect is assessed experimentally rather than assumed tautologically. The derivation chain remains self-contained because the learned weights and final metrics are falsifiable on independent data splits.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond standard supervised learning assumptions; the adaptive weights are learned rather than postulated as new entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5466 in / 1056 out tokens · 24019 ms · 2026-05-15T06:49:06.610630+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Federated meta-learning with fast convergence and efficient communication.arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07876,

    [Chenet al., 2018 ] Fei Chen, Mi Luo, Zhenhua Dong, Zhen- guo Li, and Xiuqiang He. Federated meta-learning with fast convergence and efficient communication.arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07876,

    work page arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Personalized federated learning with attention-based client selection

    [Chenet al., 2024 ] Zihan Chen, Jundong Li, and Cong Shen. Personalized federated learning with attention-based client selection. InICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 6930–6934. IEEE,

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Adaptive personalized federated learning,

    [Denget al., 2020 ] Yuyang Deng, Mohammad Mahdi Ka- mani, and Mehrdad Mahdavi. Adaptive personalized fed- erated learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.13461,

    work page arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    Personalized federated learning: A meta-learning approach,

    [Fallahet al., 2020 ] Alireza Fallah, Aryan Mokhtari, and Asuman Ozdaglar. Personalized federated learn- ing: A meta-learning approach.arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.07948,

    work page arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Cg- macros: a scientific dataset for personalized nutrition and diet monitoring.Scientific Data (under review),

    [Gutierrez-Osunaet al., 2025 ] Ricardo Gutierrez-Osuna, David Kerr, Bobak Mortazavi, and Anurag Das. Cg- macros: a scientific dataset for personalized nutrition and diet monitoring.Scientific Data (under review),

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Connecting low-loss subspace for person- alized federated learning

    [Hahnet al., 2022 ] Seok-Ju Hahn, Minwoo Jeong, and Junghye Lee. Connecting low-loss subspace for person- alized federated learning. InProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 505–515,

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Multitask learning and benchmarking with clinical time series data.Scientific data, 6(1):96,

    [Harutyunyanet al., 2019 ] Hrayr Harutyunyan, Hrant Khachatrian, David C Kale, Greg Ver Steeg, and Aram Galstyan. Multitask learning and benchmarking with clinical time series data.Scientific data, 6(1):96,

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Personalized cross-silo federated learning on non- iid data

    [Huanget al., 2021 ] Yutao Huang, Lingyang Chu, Zirui Zhou, Lanjun Wang, Jiangchuan Liu, Jian Pei, and Yong Zhang. Personalized cross-silo federated learning on non- iid data. InProceedings of the AAAI conference on artifi- cial intelligence, volume 35, pages 7865–7873,

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    [Jafarlouet al., 2022 ] Salar Jafarlou, Jocelyn Lai, Zahra Mousavi, Sina Labbaf, Ramesh Jain, Nikil Dutt, Jessica Borelli, and Amir Rahmani. Objective prediction of to- morrow’s affect using multi-modal physiological data and personal chronicles: A study of monitoring college stu- dent well-being in 2020.arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.11230,

    work page arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Objective monitoring of loneliness lev- els using smart devices: A multi-device approach for men- tal health applications.Plos one, 19(6):e0298949,

    [Jafarlouet al., 2024 ] Salar Jafarlou, Iman Azimi, Joce- lyn Lai, Yuning Wang, Sina Labbaf, Brenda Nguyen, Hana Qureshi, Christopher Marcotullio, Jessica L Borelli, Nikil D Dutt, et al. Objective monitoring of loneliness lev- els using smart devices: A multi-device approach for men- tal health applications.Plos one, 19(6):e0298949,

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Differen- tially private model personalization.Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:29723–29735,

    [Jainet al., 2021 ] Prateek Jain, John Rush, Adam Smith, Shuang Song, and Abhradeep Guha Thakurta. Differen- tially private model personalization.Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:29723–29735,

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Precision medicine, ai, and the future of personalized health care.Clinical and trans- lational science, 14(1):86–93,

    [Johnsonet al., 2021 ] Kevin B Johnson, Wei-Qi Wei, Dilhan Weeraratne, Mark E Frisse, Karl Misulis, Kyu Rhee, Juan Zhao, and Jane L Snowdon. Precision medicine, ai, and the future of personalized health care.Clinical and trans- lational science, 14(1):86–93,

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Supervised con- trastive learning.Advances in neural information process- ing systems, 33:18661–18673,

    [Khoslaet al., 2020 ] Prannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang, Aaron Sarna, Yonglong Tian, Phillip Isola, Aaron Maschinot, Ce Liu, and Dilip Krishnan. Supervised con- trastive learning.Advances in neural information process- ing systems, 33:18661–18673,

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Rev- olutionizing healthcare with ai: Personalized medicine: Predictive.JETIR-Int

    [Kolluri, 2016] VENKATESW ARANAIDU Kolluri. Rev- olutionizing healthcare with ai: Personalized medicine: Predictive.JETIR-Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Innov. Res, 3(11):2349–5162,

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    [Labbafet al., 2024 ] Sina Labbaf, Mahyar Abbasian, Brenda Nguyen, Matthew Lucero, Maryam Sabah Ahmed, Asal Yunusova, Alexander Rivera, Ramesh Jain, Jessica L Borelli, Nikil Dutt, et al. Physiological and emo- tional assessment of college students using wearable and mobile devices during the 2020 covid-19 lockdown: an intensive, longitudinal dataset.Data ...

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Fedl2p: Federated learning to personal- ize.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:14818–14836,

    [Leeet al., 2023 ] Royson Lee, Minyoung Kim, Da Li, Xinchi Qiu, Timothy Hospedales, Ferenc Husz ´ar, and Nicholas Lane. Fedl2p: Federated learning to personal- ize.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:14818–14836,

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Fedbn: Federated learning on non-iid features via local batch normal- ization

    [Liet al., 2021b ] Xiaoxiao Li, Meirui Jiang, Xiaofei Zhang, Michael Kamp, and Qi Dou. Fedbn: Federated learning on non-iid features via local batch normalization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.07623,

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    Auxo: Efficient federated learning via scalable client clus- tering

    [Liuet al., 2023 ] Jiachen Liu, Fan Lai, Yinwei Dai, Aditya Akella, Harsha V Madhyastha, and Mosharaf Chowdhury. Auxo: Efficient federated learning via scalable client clus- tering. InProceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, pages 125–141,

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data

    [McMahanet al., 2017 ] Brendan McMahan, Eider Moore, Daniel Ramage, Seth Hampson, and Blaise Aguera y Ar- cas. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. InArtificial intelligence and statistics, pages 1273–1282. PMLR,

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Personalized machine learning-based pre- diction of wellbeing and empathy in healthcare profession- als.Sensors, 24(8):2640,

    [Nanet al., 2024 ] Jason Nan, Matthew S Herbert, Suzanna Purpura, Andrea N Henneken, Dhakshin Ramanathan, and Jyoti Mishra. Personalized machine learning-based pre- diction of wellbeing and empathy in healthcare profession- als.Sensors, 24(8):2640,

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.06042 , year=

    [Ohet al., 2021 ] Jaehoon Oh, Sangmook Kim, and Se- Young Yun. Fedbabu: Towards enhanced representa- tion for federated image classification.arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.06042,

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Incremental learning to personalize human activity recog- nition models: the importance of human ai collaboration

    [Siirtola and R¨oning, 2019] Pekka Siirtola and Juha R¨oning. Incremental learning to personalize human activity recog- nition models: the importance of human ai collaboration. Sensors, 19(23):5151,

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Personalized federated learning with moreau en- velopes.Advances in neural information processing sys- tems, 33:21394–21405,

    [T Dinhet al., 2020 ] Canh T Dinh, Nguyen Tran, and Josh Nguyen. Personalized federated learning with moreau en- velopes.Advances in neural information processing sys- tems, 33:21394–21405,

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Mining health knowledge graph for health risk prediction

    [Taoet al., 2020 ] Xiaohui Tao, Thuan Pham, Ji Zhang, Jian- ming Yong, Wee Pheng Goh, Wenping Zhang, and Yi Cai. Mining health knowledge graph for health risk prediction. World Wide Web, 23(4):2341–2362,

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Personalized stress monitoring using wearable sensors in everyday settings

    [Tazarvet al., 2021 ] Ali Tazarv, Sina Labbaf, Stephanie M Reich, Nikil Dutt, Amir M Rahmani, and Marco Levorato. Personalized stress monitoring using wearable sensors in everyday settings. In2021 43rd Annual International Con- ference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), pages 7332–7335. IEEE,

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Leveraging similar users for personalized language mod- eling with limited data

    [Welchet al., 2022 ] Charles Welch, Chenxi Gu, Jonathan K Kummerfeld, Veronica Perez-Rosas, and Rada Mihalcea. Leveraging similar users for personalized language mod- eling with limited data. InProceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1742–1752,

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Personalized federated learn- ing with parameter propagation

    [Wuet al., 2023 ] Jun Wu, Wenxuan Bao, Elizabeth Ainsworth, and Jingrui He. Personalized federated learn- ing with parameter propagation. InProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 2594–2605,

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    The diversity bonus: Learning from dissimilar dis- tributed clients in personalized federated learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.15464,

    [Wuet al., 2024 ] Xinghao Wu, Xuefeng Liu, Jianwei Niu, Guogang Zhu, Shaojie Tang, Xiaotian Li, and Jiannong Cao. The diversity bonus: Learning from dissimilar dis- tributed clients in personalized federated learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.15464,

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Globem dataset: multi-year datasets for longitudinal human behavior mod- eling generalization.Advances in neural information pro- cessing systems, 35:24655–24692,

    [Xuet al., 2022 ] Xuhai Xu, Han Zhang, Yasaman Sefidgar, Yiyi Ren, Xin Liu, Woosuk Seo, Jennifer Brown, Kevin Kuehn, Mike Merrill, Paula Nurius, et al. Globem dataset: multi-year datasets for longitudinal human behavior mod- eling generalization.Advances in neural information pro- cessing systems, 35:24655–24692,

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Personalized causal graph reasoning for llms: A case study on dietary recommendations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.00134,

    [Yang and Rahmani, 2025] Zhongqi Yang and Amir Rah- mani. Personalized causal graph reasoning for llms: A case study on dietary recommendations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.00134,

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Loneliness forecasting using multi-modal wear- able and mobile sensing in everyday settings

    [Yanget al., 2023 ] Zhongqi Yang, Iman Azimi, Salar Jafar- lou, Sina Labbaf, Jessica Borelli, Nikil Dutt, and Amir M Rahmani. Loneliness forecasting using multi-modal wear- able and mobile sensing in everyday settings. In2023 IEEE 19th International Conference on Body Sensor Net- works (BSN), pages 1–4. IEEE,

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Pfedmoe: Data-level personalization with mixture of experts for model-heterogeneous personalized federated learning,

    [Yiet al., 2024 ] Liping Yi, Han Yu, Chao Ren, Heng Zhang, Gang Wang, Xiaoguang Liu, and Xiaoxiao Li. pfed- moe: Data-level personalization with mixture of experts for model-heterogeneous personalized federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01350,

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Personalized collaborative clustering

    [Yueet al., 2014 ] Yisong Yue, Chong Wang, Khalid El- Arini, and Carlos Guestrin. Personalized collaborative clustering. InProceedings of the 23rd international con- ference on World wide web, pages 75–84,

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    Per- sonalized federated learning with first order model optimization,

    [Zhanget al., 2020 ] Michael Zhang, Karan Sapra, Sanja Fi- dler, Serena Yeung, and Jose M Alvarez. Personalized fed- erated learning with first order model optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.08565,

    work page arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Gpfedrec: Graph-guided personalization for federated recommenda- tion

    [Zhanget al., 2024 ] Chunxu Zhang, Guodong Long, Tianyi Zhou, Zijian Zhang, Peng Yan, and Bo Yang. Gpfedrec: Graph-guided personalization for federated recommenda- tion. InProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Confer- ence on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 4131–4142, 2024

    work page 2024