arxiv: 2605.02383 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Engineering THz-frequency light generation, detection and manipulation through graphene

Miriam S. Vitiello , Leonardo Viti

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

keywords grapheneterahertzTHzphotodetectorsmodulatorsTHz sourcesoptoelectronics2D materials

0 comments

The pith

Graphene's unique properties enable the design of custom THz devices for generating, detecting, and manipulating light.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review establishes that graphene can serve as the foundation for entirely new THz-frequency technologies because of its high tensile strength, electrical conductivity, transparency, ultrafast carrier dynamics, nonlinear optical response, electrical tunability, and compatibility with other materials. It first outlines the relevant physics of graphene's transport, electronic behavior, and light interactions, then surveys concrete advances in photodetectors, modulators, and sources operating in the 1-10 THz band. A sympathetic reader would care because these devices address pressing needs in wireless communications, quantum science, plasmonics, and ultrafast measurements, where conventional approaches often lack the required speed, tunability, or ease of integration.

Core claim

The authors claim that graphene disrupts THz engineering by allowing devices with tailored properties to be conceived and built from scratch. Its combination of mechanical robustness, high conductivity, transparency, fast carrier response, nonlinear optics under strong fields, and electrical control supports the creation of photodetectors, modulators, and sources when integrated with semiconductor platforms. The review traces this potential from basic electronic and ultrafast properties through to demonstrated micro- and nano-scale components in the far infrared.

What carries the argument

Graphene's optoelectronic properties, especially its ultrafast carrier dynamics and electrical tunability, which allow ad-hoc THz device architectures.

If this is right

THz photodetectors can be built with graphene to exploit its fast response and tunability for sensitive far-infrared detection.
Electrically tunable modulators become feasible by leveraging graphene's conductivity changes under gate control.
Nonlinear optical effects in graphene can be harnessed to generate THz radiation in compact sources.
Hybrid integration with semiconductors enables complete THz systems for applications in wireless links and quantum sensing.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Graphene THz components could simplify plasmonic and nanophotonic circuits by providing a single material base for both active and passive elements.
The same integration advantages might extend the approach to related frequency bands or hybrid quantum-classical devices.
If integration challenges prove manageable, graphene could reduce reliance on bulky cryogenic or vacuum-based THz equipment.

Load-bearing premise

The fundamental properties of graphene will translate into practical, scalable micro- and nano-scale THz devices without major unforeseen limitations in real-world integration or performance.

What would settle it

Fabrication and testing of multiple graphene THz prototypes that show consistent shortfalls in speed, efficiency, or integration compared with existing technologies, traceable to overlooked material or interface constraints.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.02383 by Leonardo Viti, Miriam S. Vitiello.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Electronic band structure of graphene. (a) The conduction and valence bandd intersect at six vertices of the hexagonal Brillouin zone, known as K points. The zoom shows that the dispersion relation near the K points is linear, resembling the energy spectrum of massless Dirac particles. Adapted from ref. [87]: reproduced with permission from Reviews of Modern Physics, 81, 109 (2009), Copyright 2009, America… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: THz-induced thermal photoresponse mechanisms in graphene. (a) Photo-thermoelectric (PTE) effect: when the temperature gradient in the electronic distribution (red shaded area) overlaps with a gradient in Sb (the dashed line indicates the junction between two regions with different Seebeck coefficient), a PTE electrical signal is generated. (b) The photo-bolometric (PB) effect doesn’t need an asymmetry in t… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Graphene-based amplitude modulators: architecture evolution towards high cut-off frequency devices. (a) Schematics of a broadband tunable modulator based on large-area graphene operating in transmission. Adapted from ref. [175]: reprinted with permission from Nano Lett. 12, 4518–4522. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society. (b) A grating-gated reflection modulator based on a single-layer graphene (SLG) i… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Polarization and phase modulators based on graphene view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Terahertz saturable absorbers. (a-c) Open aperture z-scan traces measured on a turbostratic multilayer graphene sample grown on a substrate of silicon carbide, with n = 25 (a), n= 80 (b) and n = 85 (c) layers (solid dots), and of the substrate (empty dots). The fit curves assuming the simple two-level saturable absorber model are shown as red lines. (d) Plot of saturation intensity as a function of the num… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Graphene has been one of the most investigated materials in the last decade. Its unique optoelectronic properties have indeed raised it to an ideal and revolutionary candidate for the development of entirely novel technologies across the whole electromagnetic spectrum, from the microwaves to the x-rays, even crossing domain of intense application relevance, as terahertz (THz) frequencies. Owing to its exceptionally high tensile strength, electrical conductivity, transparency, ultra-fast carrier dynamics, non-linear optical response to intense fields, electrical tunability and ease of integration with semiconductor materials, graphene is a key disruptor for the engineering of generation, manipulation, and detection technologies with ad-hoc properties, conceived from scratch. In this review, we elucidate the fundamental properties of graphene, with an emphasis on its transport, electronic, ultrafast and non-linear interactions, and explore its enormous technological potential of integration with a diverse array of material platforms. We start with a concise introduction to graphene physics, followed by the most remarkable technological developments of graphene-based photodetectors, modulators, and sources in the 1-10 THz frequency range. As such, this review aims to serve as a valuable resource for a broad audience, ranging from novices to experts, who are keen to explore graphene physics for conceiving and realizing micro- and nano-scale devices and systems in the far infrared. This would allow addressing the present challenging application needs in quantum science, wireless communications, ultrafast science, plasmonics and nanophotonics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a review that organizes graphene THz work without new results or deep fixes for integration limits.

read the letter

This paper is a review that gathers existing literature on graphene for THz generation, detection, and manipulation. It adds no new experiments, derivations, or data of its own. The authors open with a short account of graphene physics, covering transport, electronic properties, ultrafast carrier dynamics, and nonlinear response to intense fields. They then survey photodetectors, modulators, and sources in the 1-10 THz range and note possibilities for integration with semiconductor materials. That structure gives a single place to see the main device concepts and why people expect graphene to matter here, which can be useful for readers who do not want to track every original paper separately. The focus on electrical tunability and material compatibility stands out as directly relevant to device thinking. The central claim that graphene's strength, conductivity, transparency, and fast dynamics make it a key disruptor rests on the idea that these properties will carry through to working micro- and nano-scale systems. The review does not appear to quantify how integration changes mobility, what fabrication yields look like at scale, or how the cited devices compare head-to-head with established THz platforms on metrics that matter for applications. Without those details the optimistic framing stays at the level of potential rather than demonstrated advantage. This is aimed at novices and researchers outside the immediate area who want an entry point into graphene THz ideas for wireless communications, quantum sensing, or nanophotonics. Experts will still need the cited sources for specifics. It deserves a serious referee because a balanced review can save community time if the coverage is accurate and the practical caveats are stated plainly. I would send it out for review rather than desk reject it.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review that introduces graphene's fundamental optoelectronic properties (transport, electronic structure, ultrafast carrier dynamics, and nonlinear response) and surveys its applications for THz (1-10 THz) photodetectors, modulators, and sources. It argues that graphene's tensile strength, conductivity, transparency, tunability, and integration ease make it a disruptive platform for engineering custom THz generation, detection, and manipulation technologies from the ground up.

Significance. If the literature summaries are balanced and accurate, the review could serve as a useful consolidated resource for researchers in nanophotonics and THz engineering by linking graphene physics to device concepts. Its value would be enhanced by explicit discussion of how the listed properties overcome or fail to overcome integration barriers, but the current framing risks overstating immediate practicality without head-to-head metrics.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract and opening paragraphs: the central claim that graphene's properties enable 'technologies with ad-hoc properties, conceived from scratch' and position it as a 'key disruptor' is load-bearing for the entire review, yet the text does not quantify how these properties overcome real-world barriers such as mobility degradation upon integration, fabrication yield, or direct performance comparisons versus competing platforms (e.g., III-V semiconductors or other 2D materials) in the 1-10 THz window.
[Technological developments sections] Sections surveying photodetectors, modulators, and sources: while remarkable developments are highlighted, the review does not systematically address scalability limits or unforeseen integration constraints (e.g., contact resistance, dielectric losses, or thermal management in micro/nano-scale devices), which directly affects whether the fundamental properties translate to practical, superior devices as asserted.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract and introduction could more explicitly state the review's scope (e.g., time period covered or selection criteria for cited works) to help readers assess completeness.
[Figures and tables] Figure captions and any summary tables would benefit from clearer indication of whether performance metrics are experimental or simulated, and at what specific frequencies within 1-10 THz.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and the recommendation for minor revision. The feedback identifies opportunities to strengthen the balance between highlighting graphene's potential and acknowledging practical integration challenges. We have revised the manuscript accordingly, as detailed in the point-by-point responses below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and opening paragraphs: the central claim that graphene's properties enable 'technologies with ad-hoc properties, conceived from scratch' and position it as a 'key disruptor' is load-bearing for the entire review, yet the text does not quantify how these properties overcome real-world barriers such as mobility degradation upon integration, fabrication yield, or direct performance comparisons versus competing platforms (e.g., III-V semiconductors or other 2D materials) in the 1-10 THz window.

Authors: We appreciate the referee's identification of this point. The review is structured around graphene's distinctive properties and their enabling role for THz technologies, but we agree that the absence of explicit quantification of barriers and comparative metrics leaves the 'key disruptor' framing somewhat unqualified. In the revised manuscript, we will add concise language in the abstract and opening paragraphs that acknowledges mobility degradation upon integration, fabrication yield considerations, and references to head-to-head performance data versus III-V platforms and other 2D materials in the 1-10 THz range. These additions will be supported by appropriate citations without changing the overall emphasis on graphene's unique advantages. revision: yes
Referee: [Technological developments sections] Sections surveying photodetectors, modulators, and sources: while remarkable developments are highlighted, the review does not systematically address scalability limits or unforeseen integration constraints (e.g., contact resistance, dielectric losses, or thermal management in micro/nano-scale devices), which directly affects whether the fundamental properties translate to practical, superior devices as asserted.

Authors: The referee is correct that the device sections emphasize notable experimental results but do not systematically treat scalability limits or integration constraints. This omission can make it difficult for readers to assess the translation from fundamental properties to deployable devices. We will revise the photodetector, modulator, and source sections to incorporate brief, literature-supported discussions of contact resistance, dielectric losses, and thermal management issues at micro- and nano-scales. These additions will provide a more complete context for the practical implications of the highlighted developments. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper with no derivation chain or self-referential predictions

full rationale

This is a review article that summarizes graphene's established optoelectronic properties from external literature and surveys existing THz device developments. No new equations, first-principles derivations, fitted parameters, or predictions are introduced that could reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction. Central statements about graphene as a 'key disruptor' rest on cited prior work rather than self-citation chains or ansatzes. The absence of any load-bearing self-referential steps makes the paper self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review rests on established domain knowledge about graphene rather than introducing new free parameters, axioms, or entities.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Graphene possesses high tensile strength, electrical conductivity, transparency, ultra-fast carrier dynamics, non-linear optical response, and electrical tunability.
This is the core premise drawn from prior graphene literature and invoked throughout the abstract to support technological potential.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5562 in / 1098 out tokens · 88468 ms · 2026-05-08T18:57:55.298479+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Foundation/AlphaDerivationExplicit.lean alphaProvenanceCert (RS derives α⁻¹ from 44π·exp(...) on the φ-ladder; paper merely uses α as an empirical input, no contact with RS derivation) unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

graphene ... displays ... a frequency independent absorption/layer of απ ≈ 2.3 %, being α the fine constant

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

288 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

[1]

Mourou, C

G. Mourou, C. V. Stancampiano, and D. Blumenthal, Appl. Phys. Lett. 38, 470–472 (1981)

1981
[2]

D. H. Auston, K. P. Cheung, and P. R. Smith, Appl. Phys. Lett., 45,284–286 (1984)

1984
[3]

E. R. Brown, F. W. Smith, and K. A. McIntosh, J. Appl. Phys. 73, 1480–1484 (1993)

1993
[4]

B. B. Hu, X.-C. Zhang, D. H. Auston, and P. R. Smith, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 506–508 (1990)

1990
[5]

Wu and X.-C

Q. Wu and X.-C. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett., 67, 3523–3525 (1995)

1995
[6]

D. H. Auston and K. P. Cheung, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2, 606–612 (1985)

1985
[7]

Koenig, D

S. Koenig, D. Lopez -Diaz, J. Antes, F. Boes, R. Henneberger, A. Leuther, A. Tessmann, R. Schmogrow, D. Hillerkuss, R. Palmer, T. Zwick, C. Koos, W. Freude, O. Ambacher, J. Leuthold, and I. Kallfass, Nat. Photonics, 7, 977-981 (2013)

2013
[9]

J. F. Federici, B. Schulkin, F. Huang, D. Gary, R. Barat, F. Oliveira, D. Zimdars, Semicond. Sci. Technol., 20, S266-S280 (2005)

2005
[10]

Azizi, S

S. Azizi, S. Nouri-Novin, M.M. Seyedsharbaty, and F.B. Zarrabi, Opt. Quant. Electron., 50, 230 (2018)

2018
[11]

W. Yeo, O. Gurel, N. Srinivasan, P.D. King, N.K. Nahar, S. Park, N.L. Lehman, and K. Sertel, IEEE Trans. Thz. Sci. Techn., 7, 711-721 (2017)

2017
[12]

Zhang, K

R. Zhang, K. Yang, Q.H. Abbasi, N.A. AbuAli, and A. Alomainy, IEEE Trans. Thz. Sci. Techn. 8, 381-389 (2018)

2018
[13]

Wallace, P.F

V.P. Wallace, P.F. Taday, A.J. Fitzgerald, R.M. Woodward, J. Cluff, R.J. Pye, and D.D. Arnone, Faraday Discuss. 126, 255-263 (2004)

2004
[14]

Afsah-Hejri, P

L. Afsah-Hejri, P. Hajeb, P. Ara, and R. J. Ehsani, Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 18, 1563 -1621 (2019). https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1541 - 4337.12490

work page doi:10.1111/1541 2019
[15]

A. Ren, A. Zahid, D. Fan, X. Yang , M. A. Imran, A. Alomainy, and Q. H. Abbasi, Trends in Food Science & Technology 85, 241-251 (2019). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924224418308768

2019
[16]

Taslakov, V

M. Taslakov, V. Simeonov and H. van den Bergh, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 113, 012055 ( 2008). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/113/1/012055

work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/113/1/012055 2008
[17]

Consolino, S

L. Consolino, S. Bartalini, H. E. Beere, D. A. Ritchie, M. S. Vitiello, and P. De Natale, Sensors 13, 3331-3340 (2013). https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/13/3/3331

2013
[18]

Borri, P

S. Borri, P. Patimisco, A. Sampaolo, H. E. Beere, D. A. Ritchie, M. S. Vitiello, G. Scamarcio, and V. Spagnolo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 021105 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812438

work page doi:10.1063/1.4812438 2013
[19]

Naftaly, N

M. Naftaly, N. Vieweg, A. Deninger, A. Sensors 19, 4203 (2019 ). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19194203

work page doi:10.3390/s19194203 2019
[20]

Cooper, R.J

K.B. Cooper, R.J. Dengler, N. Llombart, B. Thomas, G. Chattopadhyay, and P.H. Siegel, IEEE Trans. Thz. Sci. Techn., 1, 169-182 (2011)

2011
[21]

Iwaszczuk, A.C

K. Iwaszczuk, A.C. Strikwerda, K. Fan, X. Zhang, R.D. Averitt, and P.U. Jepsen, Opt. Express 20, 635-643 (2012)

2012
[22]

A. Geim, K. Novoselov, Nature Mater. 6, 183–191 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1849

work page doi:10.1038/nmat1849 2007
[23]

F. Xia, T. Mueller, Y. M. Lin, A. Valdes-Garcia, and P. Avouris, Nature Nanotech. 4, 839–843, (2009)

2009
[24]

Vicarelli, M

L. Vicarelli, M. S. Vitiello, D. Coquillat, A. Lombardo, A. C. Ferrari, W. Knap, M. Polini, V. Pellegrini, and A. Tredicucci, Nature Mater. 11, 865–871 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3417 This is the authors' version of the submitted article, published in its final form at https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0199461 29

work page doi:10.1038/nmat3417 2012
[25]

F. H. L. Koppens, T. Mueller, P. Avouris, A. C. Ferrari, M. S. Vitiello and M. Polini, Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 780–793 (2014)

2014
[26]

L. Viti, D. G. Purdie, A. Lombardo, A. C. Ferrari, and M. S. Vitiello, Nano Lett. 20, 3169 (2020)

2020
[27]

Asgari, E

M. Asgari, E. Riccardi, O. Balci, D. De Fazio, S. M. Shinde, J. Zhang, S. Mignuzzi, F. H. L. Koppens, A. C. Ferrari, L. Viti, and M. S. Vitiello, ACS Nano 15, 17966–17976 (2021)

2021
[28]

M. Liu, X. Yin, E. Ulin-Avila, B. Geng, T. Zentgraf, L. Ju, F. Wang, and X. Zhang, Nature 474, 64–67 (2011)

2011
[29]

Tunable, Grating-Gated, Graphene-On- Polyimide Terahertz Modulators

A. Di Gaspare, E. A. A. Pogna, L. Salem i, O. Balci, A. R. Cadore, S. M. Shinde, L. Li, C. di Franco, A. G. Davies, E. H. Linfield, A. C. Ferrari, G. Scamarcio, and M. S. Vitiello, Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2008039 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202008039

work page doi:10.1002/adfm.202008039 2021
[30]

Di Gaspare, E

A. Di Gaspare, E. A. A. Pogna, E. Riccardi, S. M. A. Sarfraz, G. Scamarcio, and M. S. Vitiello, Adv. Optical Mater. 10, 2200819 (2022)

2022
[31]

A. N. Grigorenko, M. Polini, and K. S. Novoselov, Nature Photon. 6, 749–758 (2012)

2012
[32]

Z. Sun, T. Hasan, F. Torrisi, D. Popa, G. Privitera, F. Wang, F. Bonaccorso, D. M. Basko, and A. C. Ferrari, ACS Nano 4, 803–810 (2010)

2010
[33]

Riccardi, V

E. Riccardi, V. Pistore, S. Kang, L. Seitner, A. De Vetter, C. Jirauschek, J. Mangeney, L. Li, A. G. Davies, E. H. Linfield, A. C. F errari, S. S. Dhillon, and M. S. Vitiello, Nat. Photon. 17, 607 –614 (2023)

2023
[34]

Stankovich, D.A

S. Stankovich, D.A. Dikin, R.D. Piner, K.A. Kohlhaas, A. Kleinhammes, Y. Jia, Y. Wu, S.T. Nguyen, and R.S. Ruoff, Carbon 45, 1558-1565 (2007)

2007
[35]

S. Lee, K. Lee, and Z. Zhong, Nano Lett., 10, 4702-4707 (2010)

2010
[36]

P. R. Somani, S. P. Somani, and M. Umeno, Chem. Phys. Lett., 430, 56-59 (2006)

2006
[37]

H. Cao, Q. Yu, R. Colby, D. Pandey, C. S. Park, J. Lian, D. Zemlyanov, I. Childres, V. Drachev, E. A. Stach, M. Hussain, H. Li, S. S. Pei, and Y. P. Chen, J. Appl. Phys. 107, 044310 (2010)

2010
[38]

Bhaviripudi, X

S. Bhaviripudi, X. Jia, M.S. Dresselhaus, and J. Kong, Nano Lett. 10, 4128-4133 (2010)

2010
[39]

K.S. Kim, Y. Zhao, H. Jang, S.Y. Lee, J.M. Kim, K.S. Kim, J.-H. Ahn, P. Kim, J.-Y. Choi, and B.H. Hong, Nature, 457, 706-710 (2009)

2009
[40]

X. Li, W. Cai, J. An, S. Kim, J. Nah, D. Yang, R. Piner, A. Velamakanni, I. Jung, E. Tutuc, S.K. Banerjee, L. Colombo, and R.S. Ruoff, Science 324, 1312 (2009)

2009
[41]

S. J. Chae, F. Güneş, K. K. Kim, E. S. Ki m, G. H. Han, S. M. Kim, H.-J. Shin, S.-M. Yoon, J.- Y. Choi, M. H. Park, C. W. Yang, D. Pribat, and Y. H. Lee, Adv. Mater. 21, 2328-2333 (2009)

2009
[43]

Goossens, G

S. Goossens, G. Navickaite, C. Monasterio, S. Gupta, J. J. Piqueras, R. Pérez, G. Burwell, I. Nikitskiy, T. Lasanta, T. Galán T., E. Puma, A. Centeno, A. Pesquera, A. Zurutuza, G. Konstantatos, and F. H. L. Koppens, Nat. Photonics 11, 366–371 (2017). 10.1038/nphoton.2017.75

work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2017.75 2017
[44]

Sassi, R

U. Sassi, R. Parret, S. Nanot, M. Bruna, S. Borini, D. De Fazio, Z. Zhao, E. Lidorikis, F. H. L. Koppens, A. C. Ferrari, and A. Colli, Nat. Commun. 8, 14311 (2017). 10.1038/ncomms14311

work page doi:10.1038/ncomms14311 2017
[45]

Miseikis, S

V. Miseikis, S. Marconi, M. A. G iambra, A. Montanaro, L. Martini, F. Fabbri, S. Pezzini, G. Piccinini, S. Forti, B. Terrés, I. Goykhman, L. Hamidouche, P. Legagneux, V. Sorianello, A. C. Ferrari, F. H. L. Koppens, M. Romagnoli, and C. Coletti, ACS Nano 14, 11190 –11204 (2020). 10.1021/acsnano.0c02738

work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c02738 2020
[46]

M. A. Giambra, V. Mišeikis, S. Pezzini, S. Marconi, A. Montanaro, F. Fabbri, V. Sorianello, A. C. Ferrari, C. Coletti, and M. Romagnoli, ACS Nano 15, 3171 –3187 (2021).. 10.1021/acsnano.0c09758

work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c09758 2021
[47]

K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. M orozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov, Science, 306, 666-669 (2004)

2004
[48]

K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, M. I. Katsnelson, I. V. Grigorieva, S. V. Dubonos, and A. A. Firsov, Nature 438, 197-200 (2005)

2005
[49]

R. R. Nair, P. Blake, A. N. Grigorenko, K. S. Novoselov, T. J. Booth, T. Stauber, N. M. R. Peres, and A. K. Geim, Science 320, 1308 (2008)

2008
[50]

Massicotte, G

M. Massicotte, G. Soavi, A. Principi, and K.-J. Tielrooij, Nanoscale 13, 8376–8411 (2021)

2021
[51]

Schwierz, Proceedings of the IEEE 101, 1567-1584 (2013)

F. Schwierz, Proceedings of the IEEE 101, 1567-1584 (2013)

2013
[52]

J. Basu, J. K. Basu, and T. K. Bhattacharyya, Int. J. Smart Nano Mater. 1, 201 (2010)

2010
[53]

A. S. Mayorov, R. V. Gorbachev, S. V. Morozov, L. Britnell, R. Jalil, L. A. Ponomarenko, P. Blake, K. S. Novoselov, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and A. K. Geim, Nano Lett. 11, 2396 (2011)

2011
[54]

Zhang, Y.-W

Y. Zhang, Y.-W. Tan, H. L. Stormer, and P. Kim, Nature 438, 201-204 (2005)

2005
[55]

R. Du, M. -H. Liu, J. Mohrmann, F. Wu, R. Krupke, H. von Löhneysen, K. Ri chter, and R. Danneau, Phys. Rev. Lett., 121, 127706 (2018)

2018
[56]

Sañudo, and R

J. Sañudo, and R. López-Ruiz, Phys. Lett. A 378, 1005-1009 (2014)

2014
[57]

T. R. Robinson, Am. J. Phys. 80, 141-147 (2012)

2012
[58]

H. Chen, L. Gao, Z. Qin, Y. Ge, K. Khan, Y. Song, G. Xie, S. Xu, and H. Zhang, Appl. Mater. Today 21, 100800 (2020)

2020
[59]

Huang, L

Y. Huang, L. Liu, M. Pu, X. Li, X. Ma, and X. Luo, Nanoscale 10, 8298-8303 (2018)

2018
[61]

B. Zhu, Y. Feng, J. Zhao, C. Huang, Z. Wang, and T. Jiang, Opt. Express 18, 23196 -23203 (2010)

2010
[62]

D. A. Smirnova, A. E. Miroshnichenko, Y. S. Kivshar, and A. B. Khanikaev, Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 92, 161406 (2015)

2015
[63]

Soavi, G

G. Soavi, G. Wang, H. Rostami, D. G. Purdie, D. De Fazio, T. Ma, B. Luo, J. Wang, A. K. Ott, D. Yoon, S. A. Bourelle, J. E. Muench, I. Goykhman, S. Dal Conte, M. Celebrano, A. Tomadin, M. Polini, G. Cerullo, and A. C. Ferrari, Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 583–588 (2018)

2018
[64]

Soavi, G

G. Soavi, G. Wang, H. Rostami, A. Tomadin, O. Balci, I. Paradisanos, E. A. A. Pogna, G. Cerullo, E. Lidorikis, M. Polini, and A. C. Ferrari, ACS Photonics 6, 2841–2849 (2019)

2019
[65]

J. M. Dawlaty, S. Shivaraman, J. Strait, P. George, M. Chandrashekhar, F. Rana, M. G. Spencer, D. Veksler, and Y. Chen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 131905 (2008)

2008
[66]

F. Wang, Y. Zhang, C. Tian, C. Girit, A. Zettl, M. Crommie, and Y. R. Shen, Science 320, 206– 209 (2008)

2008
[67]

Bianchi, T

V. Bianchi, T. Carey, L. Viti, L. Li, E. H. Linfield, A. G. Davies, A. Tredicucci, D. Yoon, P. G. Karagiannidis, L. Lombardi, F. Tomarchio, A. C. Ferrari, F. Torrisi, and M. S. Vitiello, Nat. Commun. 8, 15763 (2017)

2017
[68]

H. Y. Hwang, N. C. Brandt, H. Farhat, A. L. Hsu, J. Kong, and K. A. Nelson, J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 15819–15824 (2013)

2013
[69]

Brida, A

D. Brida, A. Tomadin, C. Manzoni, Y. J. Kim, A. Lombardo, S. Milana, R. R. Nair, K. S. Novoselov, A.C. Ferrari, G. Cerullo, and M. Polini. Nat. Commun. 4, 1987 (2013)

1987
[70]

A. C. Ferrari et al., Nanoscale 7, 4598–4810 (2015)

2015
[71]

M. J. Paul, Y. C. Chang, Z. J. Thompson, A. Stickel, J. Wardini, H. Choi, E. D. Minot, B. Hou, J. A. Nees, and T. B. Norris, New J. Phys. 15, 85019 (2013)

2013
[72]

Z. Mics, K. -J. Tielrooij, K. Parvez, S. A. Jensen, I. Ivanov, X. Feng, K. Müllen, M. Bonn, D. Turchinovich, Nat. Commun. 6, 7655 (2015)

2015
[73]

H. A. Hafez, S. Kovalev, K. -J. Tielrooij, M. Bonn, M. Gensch, and D. Turchinovich, Adv. Optical Mater. 8, 1900771 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201900771

work page doi:10.1002/adom.201900771 2020
[74]

Romagnoli, V

M. Romagnoli, V. Sorianello, M. Midrio, F. H. L. Koppens, C. Huyghebaert, D. Neumaier, P. Galli, W. Templ, A. D’Errico and A. C. Ferrari, Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 392–414 (2018)

2018
[75]

D. G. Papageorgiou, I. A. Kinloch, and R. J. Yo ung, Progress in Materials Science 90, 75 -127 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.004

work page doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.004 2017
[76]

F. Liu, M. Wang, Y. Chen, and J. Gao, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 276, 100 -103 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2019.04.008

work page doi:10.1016/j.jssc.2019.04.008 2019
[78]

H. A. Hafez, S. Kovalev, J.-C. Deinert, Z. Mics, B. Green, N. Awari, M. Chen, S. Germanskiy, U. Lehnert, J. Teichert, Z. Wang, K.-J. Tielrooij, Z. Liu, Z. Chen, A. Narita, K. Müllen, M. Bonn, M. Gensch, and D. Turchinovich, Nature 561, 507–511 (2018)

2018
[79]

Kovalev, H

S. Kovalev, H. A. Hafez, K. -J. Tielrooij, J. -C. Deinert, I. Ilyakov, N. Awari, D. Alcaraz, K. Soundarapandian, D. Saleta, S. Germanskiy, M. Chen, M. Bawatna, B. Green, F. H. L. Koppens, M. Mittendorff, M. Bonn, M. Gensch, D. Turchinovich, Sci. Adv. 7, eabf9809 (2021)

2021
[80]

Schwierz, Graphene transistors

F. Schwierz, Graphene transistors. Nature Nanotech 5, 487 –496 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.89

work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2010.89 2010
[81]

Cheng, J

R. Cheng, J. Bai, L. Liao, H. Zhou, Y. Chen, L. Liu, Y.-C. Lin, S. Jiang, Y. Huang, and X. Duan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11588 (2012)

2012
[82]

Bøggild, D

P. Bøggild, D. M. A. Mackenzie, P. R. Whelan, D. H. Petersen, J. D. Buron, A. Zurutuza, J. Gallop, L. Hao, and P. U. Jepsen, 2D Mater. 4, 042003 (2017). https://doi.org/10.10 88/2053- 1583/aa8683

2017
[83]

A. J. Frenzel, C. H. Lui, Y. C. Shin, J. Kong, and N. Gedik, N. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 56602 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.056602

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.056602 2014
[84]

J. W. Han, M. L. Chin, S. Matschy, J. Poojali, A. Seidl, S. Winnerl, H. A. Hafez, D. Turchinovich, G. Kumar, R. L. Myers -Ward, M. T. Dejarld, K. M. Daniels, H. D. Drew, T. E. Murphy, and M. Mittendorff, Adv. Photonics Res. 3, 2100218 (2022)

2022

Showing first 80 references.