arxiv: 2605.03746 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Tomogram-based quantifiers of nonclassicality dynamics in Kerr and cubic media

K. M. Athira , M. J. Neethu , M. Rohith

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords nonclassicalityoptical tomogramsKerr nonlinearityhomodyne detectiondecoherencefractional revivalsquantum optics

0 comments

The pith

Homodyne tomogram measures quantify nonclassicality dynamics in Kerr and cubic media without needing density matrix reconstruction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that two tomogram-derived quantities, the homodyne nonclassical area and the sum tomographic entropy, can track the rise, persistence, and decay of nonclassical features in quantum optical states. These quantities are obtained straight from balanced homodyne detection of quadrature distributions, sidestepping the need to reconstruct full density operators. The authors apply them to coherent, photon-added coherent, and even coherent states propagating in Kerr and cubic nonlinear media while subject to amplitude and phase damping. If the measures work as claimed, experimenters gain a real-time, laboratory-friendly way to monitor fractional revivals, wave-packet splitting, and macroscopic superpositions under realistic loss. The work therefore reframes nonclassicality quantification as a direct imaging problem rather than an indirect reconstruction task.

Core claim

The homodyne nonclassical area, defined as the excess quadrature variance beyond that of a coherent state, and the sum tomographic entropy extracted from conjugate-quadrature tomograms together capture the onset and decay of nonclassicality in states evolving under Kerr and cubic nonlinearities. When the dynamics are modelled by the Lindblad master equation with amplitude and phase damping, amplitude damping produces rapid monotonic decay toward the vacuum while phase damping permits longer-lived revival signatures. The entropy measure additionally registers higher-order fractional revivals and phase-space interference through persistent entropy minima under weak damping.

What carries the argument

Homodyne nonclassical area (excess quadrature variance) and sum tomographic entropy computed directly from optical tomograms obtained via balanced homodyne detection.

If this is right

Amplitude damping drives monotonic decay to vacuum while phase damping preserves partial revival features for longer times.
The measures identify fractional revivals, wave-packet splitting, and macroscopic superpositions in real time.
They function as experimentally viable tools for monitoring nonclassical dynamics in nonlinear optical media.
Conjugate-quadrature tomograms suffice to extract both area and entropy, enabling simultaneous quadrature measurements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same tomogram pipeline could be tested on other nonlinear Hamiltonians or multi-mode systems where density-matrix reconstruction remains prohibitive.
If the measures prove robust, they could be integrated into feedback loops for real-time quantum-state control in photonic devices.
A direct side-by-side comparison with Wigner negativity across a wider range of initial states would clarify the precise regimes where the tomogram quantities remain faithful.

Load-bearing premise

The two tomogram measures register every relevant nonclassical signature without false negatives or positives relative to Wigner negativity and similar established quantifiers.

What would settle it

An experimental run in which a Kerr-evolved state exhibits clear Wigner negativity yet yields zero homodyne nonclassical area, or conversely shows non-zero area with fully classical Wigner function, would falsify the claim of reliable quantification.

read the original abstract

The reliable quantification of nonclassicality in quantum states under realistic decoherence remains a central challenge in advancing quantum technologies. Conventional quantifiers such as Wigner negativity, Mandel's $Q$-parameter, nonclassical depth, etc., are often experimentally intractable, non-unique, or insensitive to key quantum signatures. We demonstrate that tomogram-based measures, the homodyne nonclassical area and sum tomographic entropy, offer a robust, experimentally accessible alternative for quantifying nonclassicality dynamics, as they can be directly obtained from optical tomograms via balanced homodyne detection, avoiding density matrix reconstruction and ensuring feasibility. We study coherent, photon-added coherent, and even coherent states evolving in Kerr and cubic nonlinear systems, with environmental effects modelled using the Lindblad master equation under amplitude and phase damping. The homodyne nonclassical area, which quantifies the excess quadrature variance beyond that of a coherent state, tracks both the onset and decay of nonclassicality, clearly identifying fractional revivals, wave packet splitting, and macroscopic superpositions. We find that amplitude damping drives a rapid monotonic decay toward the vacuum, while phase damping allows partial revival features to survive longer. Complementing this, the sum tomographic entropy derived from conjugate-quadrature tomograms captures higher-order fractional revivals and phase-space interference through persistent entropy minima under weak damping. Our results establish homodyne-based quantifiers as powerful, real-time, and experimentally viable tools for tracking nonclassical dynamics in nonlinear optical media, offering a compelling alternative to conventional, experimentally challenging measures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Tomogram quantifiers track revivals and damping in Kerr media for three state families but skip direct checks against Wigner negativity.

read the letter

The paper defines the homodyne nonclassical area from excess quadrature variance and the sum tomographic entropy from conjugate tomograms, then applies both to the Lindblad evolution of coherent, photon-added coherent, and even coherent states in Kerr and cubic media under amplitude and phase damping. The main concrete result is that these measures pick up fractional revivals and wave-packet splitting while showing amplitude damping erases features faster than phase damping. That part is straightforward and matches what one expects from the master equation for those states. The practical angle is also clear: both quantities come from balanced homodyne data without reconstructing the density matrix, which could matter for experiments that cannot afford full tomography. The calculations appear standard and reproducible from the Lindblad form given in the text. The soft spot is the missing comparison. The abstract and results claim the measures are robust alternatives, yet the paper does not plot them against Wigner negativity or nonclassical depth on the same trajectories to check for false negatives or positives outside the three example states. The damping model is also limited to amplitude and phase channels; real Kerr media often include additional loss or dephasing terms that are not tested. Without those checks, the advantage over conventional quantifiers stays plausible rather than demonstrated. This work is aimed at quantum optics groups running nonlinear media experiments who already use homodyne detection and want a lighter way to monitor nonclassicality over time. A reader focused on tomogram applications or decoherence in Kerr systems will find the definitions and the revival-tracking plots useful. It is solid enough on its own terms to deserve referee time, mainly to request the direct benchmark plots and perhaps one extra damping channel. I would send it for review with those specific requests rather than desk-reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims that two tomogram-derived quantifiers—the homodyne nonclassical area (excess quadrature variance beyond a coherent state) and sum tomographic entropy (from conjugate-quadrature tomograms)—provide experimentally accessible, robust measures of nonclassicality dynamics for coherent, photon-added coherent, and even coherent states evolving in Kerr and cubic nonlinear media. These are obtained directly via balanced homodyne detection without density-matrix reconstruction. The measures are shown numerically to track fractional revivals, wave-packet splitting, and decoherence under a Lindblad master equation with only amplitude and phase damping, with amplitude damping causing rapid decay and phase damping preserving some revival features longer.

Significance. If the numerical results hold and the measures prove free of false negatives relative to established quantifiers, the work would offer a practical experimental advantage for real-time monitoring of nonclassicality in nonlinear optical systems, avoiding the overhead of full state tomography and potentially aiding quantum technology applications in Kerr media.

major comments (2)

[Numerical results / dynamics section] The central claim that the tomogram-based measures serve as faithful proxies without false negatives or positives relative to Wigner negativity (or other established measures) is load-bearing for the robustness assertion, yet the manuscript only demonstrates agreement on three specific initial states and two damping channels. No systematic scan for counterexamples or additional decoherence channels relevant to real Kerr/cubic media is provided, leaving open the possibility that the measures miss nonclassical signatures in broader regimes.
[Results on homodyne nonclassical area and sum tomographic entropy] The abstract and results assert that the measures 'clearly identify' fractional revivals and interference effects, but without reported error bars, baseline comparisons to Wigner negativity across all time steps, or quantitative metrics (e.g., correlation coefficients between the new measures and negativity), it is difficult to assess whether the tracking is robust or merely qualitative for the chosen parameters.

minor comments (3)

[Methods / definition of measures] Clarify the precise definition of the homodyne nonclassical area (e.g., the integration limits or normalization relative to the coherent-state variance) with an explicit equation, as the current description leaves ambiguity in how 'excess variance' is computed from the tomogram.
[Discussion] The manuscript would benefit from a short table comparing the computational or experimental cost of the proposed measures versus Wigner negativity and Mandel's Q-parameter to substantiate the 'experimentally accessible' claim.
[Definition of sum tomographic entropy] Ensure consistent notation for the sum tomographic entropy (e.g., whether it is a sum over discrete bins or an integral) and add a reference to the underlying tomogram formalism if not already present.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review of our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, indicating the revisions we intend to make in the updated version.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Numerical results / dynamics section] The central claim that the tomogram-based measures serve as faithful proxies without false negatives or positives relative to Wigner negativity (or other established measures) is load-bearing for the robustness assertion, yet the manuscript only demonstrates agreement on three specific initial states and two damping channels. No systematic scan for counterexamples or additional decoherence channels relevant to real Kerr/cubic media is provided, leaving open the possibility that the measures miss nonclassical signatures in broader regimes.

Authors: We appreciate the referee's concern regarding the scope of our numerical demonstrations. Our manuscript focuses on representative cases—coherent states, photon-added coherent states, and even coherent states—under amplitude and phase damping in Kerr and cubic media to illustrate the utility of the tomogram-based quantifiers. While we agree that a comprehensive scan for counterexamples across all possible initial states and additional decoherence mechanisms (e.g., two-photon absorption or thermal noise) would further bolster the claims, such an exhaustive analysis is computationally demanding and lies beyond the primary scope of this work, which aims to introduce and validate the measures for key dynamics. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection discussing the limitations of the current study and include results for an additional combined damping channel to provide further evidence of consistency. We maintain that the chosen examples capture the essential features of nonclassicality onset, revivals, and decay relevant to these systems. revision: partial
Referee: [Results on homodyne nonclassical area and sum tomographic entropy] The abstract and results assert that the measures 'clearly identify' fractional revivals and interference effects, but without reported error bars, baseline comparisons to Wigner negativity across all time steps, or quantitative metrics (e.g., correlation coefficients between the new measures and negativity), it is difficult to assess whether the tracking is robust or merely qualitative for the chosen parameters.

Authors: We agree that incorporating quantitative metrics would strengthen the presentation of our results. In the revised manuscript, we will include Pearson correlation coefficients between the homodyne nonclassical area, the sum tomographic entropy, and the Wigner negativity for each of the studied cases across the time evolution. This will provide a clear quantitative measure of how well the new quantifiers track the established negativity measure. Regarding error bars, as our results are obtained from deterministic numerical solutions of the Lindblad master equation, there are no statistical uncertainties; however, we will report the sensitivity of the measures to variations in numerical integration parameters to address robustness. We will also add baseline comparisons by plotting the measures alongside Wigner negativity in the figures or supplementary material. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: measures defined from standard tomogram statistics and applied to independent Lindblad evolution

full rationale

The paper defines homodyne nonclassical area via excess quadrature variance relative to coherent states and sum tomographic entropy from minima in conjugate tomograms. These are computed directly on states evolved under the standard Lindblad master equation (amplitude and phase damping) for coherent, photon-added coherent, and even coherent states in Kerr/cubic media. No equation reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz, and no renaming of known results occurs. The numerical tracking of revivals and decay is independent of the quantifier definitions themselves.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; full paper may contain additional fitted scales or assumptions not visible here.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Lindblad master equation with amplitude and phase damping channels accurately models the dominant decoherence processes in Kerr and cubic nonlinear media
Standard modeling choice in quantum optics; invoked to generate the dynamics whose nonclassicality is then quantified.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5580 in / 1357 out tokens · 43262 ms · 2026-05-08T18:48:05.898358+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith.Cost (Jcost = ½(x+x⁻¹)−1) washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the homodyne nonclassical area, which quantifies the excess quadrature variance beyond that of a coherent state ... σ(|ψ⟩)−√(2π)=∫₀^{2π} ΔX_θ dθ−√(2π)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

[1]

Professor D. F. Walls, D.G.J.M.a..: Quantum Optics, 1st edn. Springer Study Edition. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79504-6

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-79504-6 1994
[2]

Vogel, W., Sperling, J.: Uniﬁed quantiﬁcation of nonclassicality and e ntanglement. Phys. Rev. A 89, 052302 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.052302

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.89.052302 2014
[3]

Squeezed states of light.nature, 306(5939):141–146, 1983

Walls, D.F.: Squeezed states of light. nature 306(5939), 141–146 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1038/306141a0

work page doi:10.1038/306141a0 1983
[4]

Mandel, L.: Sub-poissonian photon statistics in resonance ﬂuore scence. Opt. Lett. 4(7), 205–207 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.4.000205

work page doi:10.1364/ol.4.000205 1979
[5]

Kimble, H.J., Dagenais, M., Mandel, L.: Photon antibunching in resonance ﬂuorescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 691–695 (1977) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.691

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.39.691 1977
[6]

L¨ utkenhaus, N., Barnett, S.M.: Nonclassical eﬀects in phase sp ace. Phys. Rev. A 51, 3340–3342 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.51.3340

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.51.3340 1995
[7]

Albarelli, F., Ferraro, A., Paternostro, M., Paris, M.G.A.: Nonlinearit y as a resource for nonclassicality in anharmonic systems. Phys. Rev. A 93, 032112 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.032112

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.93.032112 2016
[8]

Pezz` e, L., Smerzi, A., Oberthaler, M.K., Schmied, R., Treutlein, P.: Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035005 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.035005 29

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.035005 2018
[9]

Agarwal, G.S., Puri, R.R.: Collapse and revival phenomenon in the evo lution of a resonant ﬁeld in a kerr-like medium. Phys. Rev. A 39, 2969–2977 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.39.2969

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.39.2969 1989
[10]

Rohith, M., Sudheesh, C.: Fractional revivals of superposed co her- ent states. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 47(4), 045504 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/47/4/045504

work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/47/4/045504 2014
[11]

Cerf, N.J., Ipe, A., Rottenberg, X.: Cloning of continuous quantum variables. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1754–1757 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1754

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.1754 2000
[12]

Xie, W., Kay, A., Tamon, C.: Breaking the speed limit for per- fect quantum state transfer. Phys. Rev. A 108, 012408 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.012408

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.108.012408 2023
[13]

Chen, B., Song, Z., Sun, C.P.: Fractional revivals of the quan- tum state in a tight-binding chain. Phys. Rev. A 75, 012113 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.75.012113

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.75.012113 2007
[14]

Matos Filho, R.L., Vogel, W.: Even and odd coherent states of the motion of a trapped ion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 608–611 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.608

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.608 1996
[15]

Rohith, M., Sudheesh, C.: Visualizing revivals and fractional reviv als in a kerr medium using an optical tomogram. Phys. Rev. A 92, 053828 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.053828

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.92.053828 2015
[16]

Miao, Q., Agarwal, G.S.: Kerr nonlinearity induced nonreciprocity in dissipatively coupled resonators. Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033020 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.033020

work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.033020 2024
[17]

Cui, L., Su, J., Li, J., Liu, Y., Li, X., Ou, Z.Y.: Quantum state engineer - ing by nonlinear quantum interference. Phys. Rev. A 102, 033718 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.102.033718

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.102.033718 2020
[18]

Guo, J., He, Q., Fadel, M.: Quantum metrology with a squeezed ker r oscillator. Phys. Rev. A 109, 052604 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.109.052604

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.109.052604 2024
[19]

Kyriienko, O., Krizhanovskii, D.N., Shelykh, I.A.: Nonlinear quan- tum optics with trion polaritons in 2d monolayers: Conventional and unconventional photon blockade. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 197402 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.197402

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.197402 2020
[20]

Yanagimoto, R., Onodera, T., Ng, E., Wright, L.G., McMahon, P.L., Mabuchi, H.: Engineering a kerr-based deterministic cubic phase gate via gaussian operations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 240503 (2020) 30 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.240503

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.240503 2020
[21]

Lamprou, T., Rivera-Dean, J., Stammer, P., Lewenstein, M., Tza llas, P.: Nonlin- ear optics using intense optical coherent state superpositions. P hys. Rev. Lett. 134, 013601 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.013601

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.013601 2025
[22]

Wigner, E.: On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilib rium. Phys. Rev. 40, 749–759 (1932) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.40.749

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.40.749 1932
[23]

Glauber, R.J.: Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation ﬁeld. Phys. Rev. 131, 2766–2788 (1963) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.131.2766

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.131.2766 1963
[24]

Sudarshan, E.C.G.: Equivalence of semiclassical and quantum mec hanical descriptions of statistical light beams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 277–279 (1963) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.277

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.10.277 1963
[25]

Pro ceedings of the Physico-Mathematical Society of Japan

HUSIMI, K.: Some formal properties of the density matrix. Pro ceedings of the Physico-Mathematical Society of Japan. 3rd Series 22(4), 264–314 (1940) https://doi.org/10.11429/ppmsj1919.22.4 264

work page doi:10.11429/ppmsj1919.22.4 1940
[26]

Hillery, M.: Nonclassical distance in quantum optics. Phys. Rev. A 35, 725–732 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.35.725

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.35.725 1987
[27]

Lee, C.T.: Measure of the nonclassicality of nonclassical states . Phys. Rev. A 44, 2775–2778 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.44.R2775

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.44.r2775 1991
[28]

Asb´ oth, J.K., Calsamiglia, J., Ritsch, H.: Computable measure of nonclassicality for light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 173602 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.173602

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.173602 2005
[29]

Negativity of the wigner function as an indicator of non-classicality

Kenfack, A., ˙Zyczkowski, K.: Negativity of the wigner function as an indicator of non-classicality. Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Op tics 6(10), 396 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1088/1464-4266/6/10/003

work page doi:10.1088/1464-4266/6/10/003 2004
[30]

Gehrke, C., Sperling, J., Vogel, W.: Quantiﬁcation of nonclassicalit y. Phys. Rev. A 86, 052118 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.052118

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.86.052118 2012
[31]

Mraz, M., Sperling, J., Vogel, W., Hage, B.: Witnessing the degree of nonclassicality of light. Phys. Rev. A 90, 033812 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.033812

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.90.033812 2014
[32]

Bohmann, M., Qi, L., Vogel, W., Chekhova, M.: Detection-device-in dependent veriﬁcation of nonclassical light. Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033178 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033178

work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.1.033178 2019
[33]

Gebhart, V., Bohmann, M., Weiher, K., Biagi, N., Zavatta, A., Bellini, M., Agudelo, E.: Identifying nonclassicality from experimental data using artiﬁcial neural networks. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023229 (2021) 31 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.023229

work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.023229 2021
[34]

Roh, C., Yoon, Y.-D., Park, J., Ra, Y.-S.: Continuous-variable non classicality certiﬁcation under coarse-grained measurement. Phys. Rev. Re s. 5, 043057 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.043057

work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.043057 2023
[35]

Rohith, M., Kannan, S., Sudheesh, C.: Homodyne nonclassical ar ea as a non- classicality indicator. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 56(5), 055501 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6455/acb678

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6455/acb678 2023
[36]

Vogel, K., Risken, H.: Determination of quasiprobability distributio ns in terms of probability distributions for the rotated quadrature phase. Ph ys. Rev. A 40, 2847–2849 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.40.2847

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.40.2847 1989
[37]

Lvovsky, A.I., Raymer, M.G.: Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 299–332 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.299

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.299 2009
[38]

Springer series in synergetics

Crispin Gardiner, P.Z.: Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian a nd Non- Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantu m Optics, 3rd edn. Springer series in synergetics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelber g (2004)

2004
[39]

(ed.) Information C on- tents of Distributions, pp

Wigner, E.P., Yanase, M.M.: In: Wightman, A.S. (ed.) Information C on- tents of Distributions, pp. 452–460. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg ( 1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09203-3 48

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-662-09203-3 1997
[40]

Marek, P., Filip, R., Furusawa, A.: Deterministic implementation of weak quantum cubic nonlinearity. Phys. Rev. A 84, 053802 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.053802

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.84.053802 2011
[41]

Meyer, D.A., Wong, T.G.: Quantum search with general nonlinearit ies. Phys. Rev. A 89, 012312 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.012312

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.89.012312 2014
[42]

Yukawa, M., Miyata, K., Yonezawa, H., Marek, P., Filip, R., Furusaw a, A.: Emulating quantum cubic nonlinearity. Phys. Rev. A 88, 053816 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.053816

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.88.053816 2013
[43]

Park, K., Marek, P., Filip, R.: Nonlinear potential of a quantum osc il- lator induced by single photons. Phys. Rev. A 90, 013804 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.013804 32

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.90.013804 2014