arxiv: 2605.03989 · v2 · submitted 2026-05-05 · 💻 cs.AI

Recognition: 2 theorem links

An Agent-Oriented Pluggable Experience-RAG Skill for Experience-Driven Retrieval Strategy Orchestration

Dutao Zhang , Tian Liao

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI

keywords Experience-RAG Skillretrieval-augmented generationagent skillsexperience memoryretrieval strategy orchestrationBeIR benchmarknDCG evaluation

0 comments

The pith

Retrieval strategy selection can be encapsulated as a pluggable agent skill that consults experience memory to adapt across tasks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces Experience-RAG Skill as a modular layer placed between an agent and a pool of retrievers. It examines the current task or scene, draws on stored past experiences to choose a suitable retrieval approach from the pool, and returns structured evidence for the agent to use. Tests on factoid question answering, multi-hop reasoning, and scientific verification datasets show the skill reaching an overall nDCG@10 of 0.8924. This score exceeds what any single fixed retriever achieves across the same mix of tasks and stays competitive with more elaborate routing methods. The central point is that orchestration of retrieval choices can be handled as a reusable skill instead of being fixed inside the main agent workflow.

Core claim

Experience-RAG Skill, an agent-oriented pluggable retrieval orchestration layer positioned between the agent and the retriever pool, analyzes the current scene, consults an experience memory, selects an appropriate retrieval strategy, and returns structured evidence to the agent. Under a fixed candidate pool, it achieves an overall nDCG@10 of 0.8924 on BeIR/nq, BeIR/hotpotqa, and BeIR/scifact, outperforming fixed single-retriever baselines and remaining competitive with Adaptive-RAG-style routing. The results suggest that retrieval strategy selection can be productively encapsulated as a reusable agent skill rather than being hard-coded in the upper workflow.

What carries the argument

Experience-RAG Skill: a pluggable layer that analyzes the current scene, consults experience memory to select a retrieval strategy from a fixed pool, and supplies structured evidence back to the agent.

If this is right

Different tasks such as factoid QA, multi-hop reasoning, and scientific verification can each receive a tailored retrieval strategy without any change to the agent's core logic.
The modular skill design keeps performance competitive with specialized routing systems while remaining reusable across agents.
New retrieval strategies can be added to the candidate pool and become available through the same experience-driven selection process.
Experience memory accumulates selections over time, allowing the skill to improve its choices on repeated or similar scenes without retraining the agent.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same experience-driven selection pattern could apply to other agent decisions such as tool choice or prompting style.
If the memory remains small and task-agnostic, the approach may scale to agents that encounter a wider range of retrieval needs without custom engineering per domain.
One could test whether the skill still works when the retriever pool itself changes dynamically during operation.

Load-bearing premise

An experience memory can reliably guide selection of retrieval strategies across heterogeneous tasks without introducing overhead or performance loss that offsets the gains.

What would settle it

A controlled test on a new task or retriever pool where the skill's choices produce lower nDCG than the single best fixed retriever or add measurable extra latency that reduces end-to-end performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03989 by Dutao Zhang, Tian Liao.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Conceptual positioning of Experience-RAG Skill. A fixed retriever applies one strategy view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Retrieval-augmented generation systems often assume that one fixed retrieval pipeline is sufficient across heterogeneous tasks, yet factoid question answering, multi-hop reasoning, and scientific verification exhibit different retrieval preferences. We present Experience-RAG Skill, an agent-oriented pluggable retrieval orchestration layer positioned between the agent and the retriever pool. The proposed skill analyzes the current scene, consults an experience memory, selects an appropriate retrieval strategy, and returns structured evidence to the agent. Under a fixed candidate pool, Experience-RAG Skill achieves an overall nDCG@10 of 0.8924 on BeIR/nq, BeIR/hotpotqa, and BeIR/scifact, outperforming fixed single-retriever baselines and remaining competitive with Adaptive-RAG-style routing. The results suggest that retrieval strategy selection can be productively encapsulated as a reusable agent skill rather than being hard-coded in the upper workflow.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper packages retrieval strategy selection as a pluggable agent skill with an experience memory, but the nDCG@10 numbers on BeIR sets cannot be checked without any description of the memory structure, selection logic, or baselines.

read the letter

The core move is to treat retrieval orchestration as a reusable agent skill that sits between the agent and a fixed pool of retrievers. It looks at the current query, pulls from an experience memory, picks a strategy, and hands back evidence. That framing is a modest but clean way to avoid hard-coding the choice in the main workflow, and it directly targets the mismatch between one-size-fits-all retrievers and tasks like factoid QA versus multi-hop reasoning or scientific fact checking. They report an aggregate nDCG@10 of 0.8924 across BeIR/nq, hotpotqa, and scifact, which beats the single-retriever baselines and stays competitive with Adaptive-RAG routing. That is the part worth noting if the details hold up. The problem is that nothing in the abstract or the available text explains how the experience memory is built, what features it stores, how the selection decision is made, or exactly which Adaptive-RAG variant and single retrievers were used. Without those pieces the performance claim sits on unverified ground. No implementation, no pseudocode, no ablation on memory size or update rules, and no mention of overhead. The idea itself is incremental rather than a new paradigm; it builds on existing routing work but repackages it in agent-skill terms. For readers already working on modular agent architectures or retrieval tuning, the paper offers a concrete label and a reported number to compare against. For anyone who needs reproducible methods or wants to build on the result, the current version is too thin. I would bring it to a reading group only if the authors add the missing sections on memory and decision procedure. Otherwise it is not ready for citation or serious refereeing.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an 'Experience-RAG Skill' as a pluggable, agent-oriented layer for orchestrating retrieval strategies in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. Positioned between the agent and a pool of retrievers, the skill analyzes the current query scene, consults an experience memory to select an appropriate retrieval strategy, and returns structured evidence. The central empirical claim is that, under a fixed candidate pool, this skill achieves an overall nDCG@10 of 0.8924 across BeIR/nq, BeIR/hotpotqa, and BeIR/scifact, outperforming fixed single-retriever baselines while remaining competitive with Adaptive-RAG-style routing. The authors suggest that retrieval strategy selection can be usefully encapsulated as a reusable agent skill.

Significance. If the reported performance gains are reproducible and attributable to the proposed experience-driven orchestration rather than implementation specifics, this work could meaningfully advance agentic RAG systems by providing a modular, pluggable mechanism for handling task-specific retrieval preferences. This addresses a practical limitation in current RAG deployments where a single fixed pipeline is often assumed sufficient across diverse tasks like factoid QA, multi-hop reasoning, and scientific fact verification. The pluggable skill design offers potential for reusability and easier integration into larger agent workflows.

major comments (1)

[Abstract and Experimental Results] Abstract and Experimental Results: The manuscript reports a specific aggregate nDCG@10 of 0.8924 and claims of outperformance over fixed single-retriever baselines and competitiveness with Adaptive-RAG-style routing, yet supplies no description of the experience memory structure, the process for populating or updating it, the decision procedure or algorithm for selecting a retrieval strategy from the pool, the exact composition of the fixed candidate pool, or the precise implementations and hyper-parameters of the compared baselines. These omissions are load-bearing for the central claim, as the empirical results are the primary evidence offered for the utility of the Experience-RAG Skill.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and for identifying the need for greater implementation detail to support the central empirical claims. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to improve reproducibility and clarity.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The manuscript reports a specific aggregate nDCG@10 of 0.8924 and claims of outperformance over fixed single-retriever baselines and competitiveness with Adaptive-RAG-style routing, yet supplies no description of the experience memory structure, the process for populating or updating it, the decision procedure or algorithm for selecting a retrieval strategy from the pool, the exact composition of the fixed candidate pool, or the precise implementations and hyper-parameters of the compared baselines. These omissions are load-bearing for the central claim, as the empirical results are the primary evidence offered for the utility of the Experience-RAG Skill.

Authors: We agree that the current manuscript does not supply these implementation details, which are necessary for reproducibility and for readers to assess the source of the reported performance. In the revised version we will expand the methodology and experimental sections to describe the experience memory structure, the process for populating and updating it, the decision procedure for selecting a retrieval strategy, the exact composition of the fixed candidate pool, and the precise implementations together with hyper-parameters of the baselines. These additions will be supported by pseudocode and tables drawn from our experimental setup and will be placed in the main text or an appendix. The reported nDCG@10 figure and comparative claims will remain unchanged. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; empirical benchmark claim stands independently

full rationale

The paper introduces Experience-RAG Skill as a pluggable orchestration layer that analyzes scenes and consults experience memory for retrieval strategy selection. Its central performance claim (overall nDCG@10 of 0.8924 on three BeIR datasets, outperforming fixed single-retriever baselines) is presented as the direct outcome of experimental evaluation under a fixed candidate pool. No equations, self-definitional constructs, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The result does not reduce to its own inputs by construction and remains externally falsifiable via the reported benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on the unelaborated effectiveness of experience memory for strategy selection; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are explicitly defined in the abstract.

invented entities (1)

Experience memory no independent evidence
purpose: Stores past task experiences to inform retrieval strategy selection
Introduced as core component of the skill but lacks independent evidence or detailed specification in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5448 in / 1164 out tokens · 39761 ms · 2026-05-08T18:07:20.728943+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

[1]

Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks

Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, et al. Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.11401, 2020

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2005
[2]

REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Training

Kelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat, and Ming-Wei Chang. REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Training. In Proceedings of ICML, 2020

2020
[3]

2007.01282 , archivePrefix=

Gautier Izacard and Edouard Grave. Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.01282, 2021

work page arXiv 2007
[4]

Improving Language Models by Retrieving from Trillions of Tokens

Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Jordan Hoffmann, et al. Improving Language Models by Retrieving from Trillions of Tokens. In Proceedings of ICML, 2022

2022
[5]

Query Rewriting in Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models

Xueguang Ma, Yeyun Gong, Pengcheng He, et al. Query Rewriting in Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 2023

2023
[6]

RAPTOR: Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized Retrieval

Parth Sarthi, Salman Abdullah, Aman Tuli, et al. RAPTOR: Recursive Abstractive Pro- cessing for Tree-Organized Retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.18059, 2024

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024
[7]

Active retrieval augmented genera- tion,

Zhengbao Jiang, Frank F. Xu, Luyu Gao, et al. Active Retrieval Augmented Generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.06983, 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[8]

Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation

Shengnan Yan et al. CRAG: Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.15884, 2024

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024
[9]

Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection

Akari Asai et al. Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self- Reflection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11511, 2023

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[10]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.15319

Jinhao Jiang, Yuhui Xu, Ming Feng, et al. LongRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Long-context LLMs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.15319, 2024. 4

work page arXiv 2024
[11]

ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models

Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, et al. ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models. In Proceedings of ICLR, 2023

2023
[12]

Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools

Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessi, et al. Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04761, 2023

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[13]

HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with Chat- GPT and its Friends in Hugging Face

Yongliang Shen, Kaitao Song, Xu Tan, et al. HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with Chat- GPT and its Friends in Hugging Face. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023

2023
[14]

Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs

Shishir G. Patil, Tianjun Zhang, Xin Wang, and Joseph E. Gonzalez. Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15334, 2023

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[15]

Sumers, Shunyu Yao, Karthik Narasimhan, and Thomas L

Theodore R. Sumers, Shunyu Yao, Karthik Narasimhan, and Thomas L. Griffiths. Cog- nitive Architectures for Language Agents. Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2023

2023
[16]

Precise zero-shot dense retrieval without relevance labels,

Luyu Gao, Xueguang Ma, Jimmy Lin, and Jamie Callan. Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labels. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10496, 2022

work page arXiv 2022
[17]

Soyeong Jeong, Jinheon Baek, Sukmin Cho, Sung Ju Hwang, and Jong C. Park. Adaptive- RAG: Learning to Adapt Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models through Question Complexity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14403, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[18]

BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models

Nandan Thakur, Nils Reimers, Andreas Rueckle, et al. BEIR: A Heterogeneous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08663, 2021. A Supplementary Experiments A.1 Ablation Study To better understand where the gains of Experience-RAG Skill come from, we also evaluated several ablated variants. The full Exp...

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021