pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.04270 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-05 · 💻 cs.HC · cs.RO· cs.SY· eess.SY

OPENJ: A Conceptual Framework for Open-Source Digital Human Modeling and Ergonomic Assessment in a CAD Environment

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 16:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC cs.ROcs.SYeess.SY
keywords digital human modelingergonomicsopen-sourceCAD integrationposture predictionworkstation designRULAmusculoskeletal risk
0
0 comments X

The pith

A conceptual framework can bring integrated digital human modeling for ergonomics into open-source CAD environments.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes OpenJ as a design blueprint that combines adjustable virtual human mannequins, inverse kinematics for predicting task postures, standardized ergonomic evaluations such as RULA and REBA, and direct operation inside CAD software. Commercial systems currently hold exclusive access to this full integrated capability set, which leaves many researchers, small enterprises, and schools reliant on manual observation methods that lack the same predictive consistency. By specifying the architecture for an open-source version, the work aims to remove cost and licensing barriers so that computational ergonomics analysis becomes available for workstation design, injury prevention, and task optimization.

Core claim

The paper states that the complete digital human modeling capability set of anthropometric mannequin generation, posture prediction, ergonomic risk assessment through established protocols, and CAD integration has remained available only in proprietary platforms since the 1980s, and that a conceptual framework can serve as the blueprint for creating an equivalent open-source implementation named OpenJ or OpenJane/OpenJoe.

What carries the argument

The OpenJ conceptual framework, which specifies how to combine anthropometric scaling, inverse kinematics posture prediction, ergonomic scoring methods, and CAD embedding into one accessible system.

If this is right

  • Engineers can run computational ergonomic assessments on workstation designs before physical construction.
  • Small and medium organizations gain access to reproducible posture prediction and risk scoring without vendor licensing fees.
  • Educational programs can incorporate virtual human modeling exercises using free, modifiable software.
  • Task sequences and equipment layouts can be iterated in simulation to improve reach, visibility, and fit.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A working version could enable user communities to extend the mannequin library or add new assessment protocols through shared code contributions.
  • The approach might encourage parallel open frameworks for other closed engineering analysis domains such as finite element human simulation.
  • Comparative studies against motion-capture data from real workers would provide an external check on the framework's predictive value.

Load-bearing premise

That a high-level conceptual outline can be turned into working software that delivers predictive accuracy and reproducibility comparable to commercial digital human modeling tools while securing enough community adoption and maintenance.

What would settle it

Release and testing of a functional OpenJ prototype that imports a CAD model, generates a scaled mannequin, predicts postures for a task, and computes RULA or REBA scores with outputs that align closely with results from an existing commercial DHM system on the same inputs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04270 by Casey E. Eaton, Sinan Bank.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIGURE 1: Proposed two-layer architecture of view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIGURE 2: Cross-tool scene: a tutorial scene from Tecnomatix Jack Student Tutorial [ view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Industrial workplace challenges range from musculoskeletal disorders -- a leading cause of occupational injury -- to suboptimal workstation layouts, inefficient task sequences, and poor human-equipment fit. Digital human modeling (DHM) tools address several of these challenges by placing a scalable virtual mannequin in a computer-aided design (CAD) environment, enabling engineers to evaluate ergonomic risk through standardized assessment methods (RULA, REBA, NIOSH Lifting Equation, OWAS), optimize workstation layouts for reach and visibility, predict task postures through inverse kinematics, and simulate operations before physical implementation. Despite four decades of development since the Jack system originated at the University of Pennsylvania in the 1980s, the integrated DHM capability set -- anthropometric mannequin, posture prediction, ergonomic assessment, and CAD integration -- remains exclusive to commercial platforms such as Siemens Tecnomatix Jack (Process Simulate), Dassault DELMIA, Humanetics RAMSIS, and the University of Iowa's Santos system. These platforms operate under proprietary, vendor-quoted pricing models, and their acquisition and operating costs, together with closed-source implementations, have been repeatedly identified as practical adoption barriers for individual researchers, small-to-medium enterprises, and educational institutions. Organizations without access resort to manual observational methods -- paper-based worksheets applied to photographs or video -- sacrificing the predictive power and reproducibility that computational analysis provides. The paper serves as a design blueprint for (OpenJane/Joe), positioning the project for subsequent open-source implementation and community adoption.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents OPENJ as a conceptual framework and design blueprint for an open-source digital human modeling (DHM) system integrated with CAD environments. It identifies cost, licensing, and closed-source barriers in existing commercial tools (e.g., Siemens Tecnomatix Jack, Dassault DELMIA, Humanetics RAMSIS) that have limited adoption since the 1980s Jack system, and outlines high-level components including scalable anthropometric mannequins, inverse-kinematics posture prediction, standardized ergonomic assessments (RULA, REBA, NIOSH, OWAS), reach/visibility optimization, and CAD interoperability to enable community-driven implementation and broader use by researchers, SMEs, and educators.

Significance. If realized as a maintained open-source project with reproducible implementations, the framework could meaningfully expand access to computational ergonomic analysis beyond manual observational methods, supporting better workstation design and injury prevention in industrial settings. The paper explicitly credits the historical development of DHM capabilities and correctly frames the proposal as a starting point rather than a completed system.

major comments (1)
  1. [Framework description (core sections outlining components)] The central claim that the proposed framework can serve as an actionable blueprint for an open-source system delivering the full integrated capability set rests on high-level component descriptions without concrete specifications (e.g., data models for anthropometric scaling, choice of IK solver and its convergence criteria, or API definitions for CAD interoperability). This makes it difficult to evaluate technical feasibility or reproducibility relative to commercial platforms.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract introduces both 'OPENJ' and the parenthetical '(OpenJane/Joe)' without clarifying the relationship or intended naming convention.
  2. [Introduction / related work] Citations to commercial platforms and prior adoption-barrier studies would benefit from explicit dates or DOIs to strengthen the historical context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on the framework description. We address the major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central claim that the proposed framework can serve as an actionable blueprint for an open-source system delivering the full integrated capability set rests on high-level component descriptions without concrete specifications (e.g., data models for anthropometric scaling, choice of IK solver and its convergence criteria, or API definitions for CAD interoperability). This makes it difficult to evaluate technical feasibility or reproducibility relative to commercial platforms.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript presents the OPENJ framework at a high level of abstraction, which limits direct assessment of technical feasibility and reproducibility. This approach is intentional, as the paper is positioned as a conceptual design blueprint (see abstract and Section 1) to guide subsequent community implementation rather than to deliver a complete technical specification or working prototype. To address the concern, we will revise the core framework sections (particularly those describing the mannequin, posture prediction, assessment modules, and CAD integration) to incorporate illustrative concrete specifications. These will include: (1) a sample parametric data model for anthropometric scaling based on standard databases such as ANSUR II or NHANES with explicit regression equations; (2) selection of an open-source IK solver (e.g., referencing IKPy or OpenSim) together with example convergence criteria such as positional error thresholds; and (3) high-level API outlines for CAD interoperability using open standards like STEP/IGES exchange or Python bindings for tools such as FreeCAD. These additions will be clearly labeled as starting points for implementation to improve actionability and allow better evaluation against commercial platforms, while noting that full validated implementations and exhaustive API documentation will be developed in the open-source project phase. This constitutes a partial revision that strengthens the blueprint without altering the paper's conceptual scope. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The document is a forward-looking conceptual design blueprint and position paper proposing an open-source DHM framework (OpenJane/Joe). It identifies adoption barriers for commercial tools and outlines high-level requirements without any mathematical derivations, equations, fitted parameters, posture predictions, or empirical performance claims. No load-bearing steps reduce to self-definition, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains; the central argument for community-driven development is self-contained and does not rely on unverified internal results or imported uniqueness theorems. This is the expected non-finding for a design-sketch paper lacking quantitative modeling.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain assumptions about the feasibility of open-source CAD integration and the sufficiency of existing ergonomic methods, without new technical contributions or evidence.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Proprietary costs and closed-source nature of current DHM platforms constitute the primary adoption barrier for SMEs and researchers.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the motivation for the open-source alternative.
  • ad hoc to paper An open-source implementation can deliver the full integrated capability set of anthropometric modeling, inverse kinematics posture prediction, standardized assessments, and CAD interoperability.
    This is the load-bearing premise of the blueprint that is not demonstrated or evidenced in the document.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5575 in / 1282 out tokens · 28877 ms · 2026-05-08T16:59:32.551688+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nonfatal Occupational Injuries and Illnesses Requiring Days Away From Work, 2015

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Nonfatal Occupational Injuries and Illnesses Requiring Days Away From Work, 2015.” (2016). URL https://www.bls.gov/news.release/osh2.nr0. htm. USDL-16-2130. Released November 10, 2016. Ac- cessed: 2026-03-30

  2. [2]

    Occupational Injuries and Illnesses Resulting in Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs)

    Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Occupational Injuries and Illnesses Resulting in Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs).” (2024). Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) Program fact sheet, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2021–2022 reference period. Accessed: 2026-04-28

  3. [3]

    and Webber, Bonnie L

    Badler, Norman I., Phillips, Cary B. and Webber, Bonnie L. Simulating Humans: Computer Graphics Animation and Control. Oxford University Press, New York (1993)

  4. [4]

    Jack Human Modelling Tool: A Review

    Blanchonette, Peter. “Jack Human Modelling Tool: A Review.” Technical Report No. DSTO-TR-2364. Defence Science and Technology Organisation (DSTO), Victoria, Australia. 2010

  5. [5]

    SAE International (2001)

    Chaffin, Don B.Digital Human Modeling for Vehicle and Workplace Design. SAE International (2001). DOI 10.4271/R-274

  6. [6]

    Improving Digital Human Modelling for ProactiveErgonomicsinDesign

    Chaffin, Don B. “Improving Digital Human Modelling for ProactiveErgonomicsinDesign.”ErgonomicsVol.48No.5 (2005): pp. 478–491. DOI 10.1080/00140130400029191

  7. [7]

    Towards a New Generation of Virtual Humans

    Abdel-Malek, Karim, Yang, Jingzhou, Marler, Timothy, Beck, Steven, Mathai, Anith, Zhou, Xianlian, Patrick, Amos and Arora, Jasbir. “Towards a New Generation of Virtual Humans.”International Journal of Human Factors Mod- elling and SimulationVol. 1 No. 1 (2006): pp. 2–39. DOI 10.1504/IJHFMS.2006.011680

  8. [8]

    RAMSIS—The Leading CAD Tool for Ergonomic Analysis of Vehicles

    van der Meulen, Peter and Seidl, Andreas. “RAMSIS—The Leading CAD Tool for Ergonomic Analysis of Vehicles.” Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceVol. 4561 (2007): pp. 1008–1017. DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-73321-8_113

  9. [9]

    Digital Human Modeling in the Occupational Safety and Health Process: An Application in Manufac- turing

    Schall Jr, Mark C., Fethke, Nathan B. and Roemig, Vic- toria. “Digital Human Modeling in the Occupational Safety and Health Process: An Application in Manufac- turing.”IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human FactorsVol. 6 No. 2 (2018): pp. 64–75. DOI 10.1080/24725838.2018.1491430

  10. [10]

    Development ofanEnd-to-EndHardwareandSoftwarePipelineforAfford- ableandFeasibleErgonomicsAssessmentintheAutomotive Industry

    González-Alonso, Javier, Simón-Martínez, Cristina, Antón- Rodríguez, María, González-Ortega, David, Díaz-Pernas, Francisco J. and Martínez-Zarzuela, Mario. “Development ofanEnd-to-EndHardwareandSoftwarePipelineforAfford- ableandFeasibleErgonomicsAssessmentintheAutomotive Industry.”Safety ScienceVol. 173 (2024): p. 106431. DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106431

  11. [11]

    Com- parison of Digital Tools for Ergonomics in Practice

    Polášek, Patrik, Bureš, Marek and Šimon, Michal. “Com- parison of Digital Tools for Ergonomics in Practice.”Pro- cedia EngineeringVol. 100 (2015): pp. 1277–1285. DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.494

  12. [12]

    OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement

    Delp,ScottL.,Anderson,FrankC.,Arnold,AllisonS.,Loan, Peter, Habib, Ayman, John, Chand T., Guendelman, Eran and Thelen, Darryl G. “OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement.” IEEETransactionsonBiomedicalEngineeringVol.54No.11 (2007): pp. 1940–1950. DOI 10.1109/TBME.2007.901024

  13. [13]

    Facco, A

    Seth, Ajay, Hicks, Jennifer L., Uchida, Thomas K., Habib, Ayman, Dembia, Christopher L., Dunne, James J., Ong, Carmichael F., DeMers, Matthew S., Rajagopal, Apoorva, Millard, Matthew et al. “OpenSim: Simulating Muscu- loskeletal Dynamics and Neuromuscular Control to Study Human and Animal Movement.”PLoS Computational Biol- ogyVol. 14 No. 7 (2018): p. e100...

  14. [14]

    biorbd: A C++, Python and MATLAB Library to Analyze and Sim- ulate the Human Body Biomechanics

    Michaud, Benjamin and Begon, Mickaël. “biorbd: A C++, Python and MATLAB Library to Analyze and Sim- ulate the Human Body Biomechanics.”Journal of Open Source SoftwareVol. 6 No. 57 (2021): p. 2562. DOI 10.21105/joss.02562

  15. [15]

    Academic Press (2019)

    Scataglini, Sofia and Paul, Gunther.DHM and Posturogra- phy. Academic Press (2019). DOI 10.1016/C2018-0-00519- 1

  16. [16]

    Mu- joco: A physics engine for model-based control

    Todorov, Emanuel, Erez, Tom and Tassa, Yuval. “MuJoCo: A Physics Engine for Model-Based Control.”IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems: pp. 5026–5033. 2012. DOI 10.1109/IROS.2012.6386109

  17. [17]

    Pose2Sim: An End-to-End Workflow for 3D Markerless Sports Kinematics—Part 1: Robustness

    Pagnon, David, Domalain, Mathieu and Reveret, Lionel. “Pose2Sim: An End-to-End Workflow for 3D Markerless Sports Kinematics—Part 1: Robustness.”SensorsVol. 21 No. 19 (2021): p. 6530. DOI 10.3390/s21196530

  18. [18]

    py- capacity: A Real-Time Task-Space Capacity Calculation Package for Robotics and Biomechanics

    Skuric, Antun, Padois, Vincent and Daney, David. “py- capacity: A Real-Time Task-Space Capacity Calculation Package for Robotics and Biomechanics.”Journal of Open Source SoftwareVol. 8 No. 89 (2023): p. 5670. DOI 10.21105/joss.05670

  19. [19]

    Document MT60010-S- 084

    Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc.Jack User Manual, Version 9.0(2017). Document MT60010-S- 084

  20. [20]

    Use of Multi- Objective Optimization for Digital Human Posture Predic- tion

    Marler, R. Timothy, Arora, Jasbir S., Yang, Jingzhou, Kim, Hyung-Joo and Abdel-Malek, Karim. “Use of Multi- Objective Optimization for Digital Human Posture Predic- tion.”Engineering OptimizationVol. 41 No. 10 (2009): pp. 925–943. DOI 10.1080/03052150902853013

  21. [21]

    AnyPyTools: A Python Package for ReproducibleResearchwiththeAnyBodyModelingSystem

    Lund, Morten Enemark, Rasmussen, John and Andersen, Michael Skipper. “AnyPyTools: A Python Package for ReproducibleResearchwiththeAnyBodyModelingSystem.” Journal of Open Source SoftwareVol. 4 No. 33 (2019): p

  22. [22]

    DOI 10.21105/joss.01108. 9

  23. [23]

    Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc.Jack Occupant Packaging Toolkit (OPT) Training Manual, Ver- sion 9.0(2017)

  24. [24]

    PyBullet, a Python Module for Physics Simulation for Games, Robotics and Machine Learning

    Coumans, Erwin and Bai, Yunfei. “PyBullet, a Python Module for Physics Simulation for Games, Robotics and Machine Learning.” (2016–2021). URL https://pybullet.org

  25. [25]

    ROS: An Open-Source Robot Operating System

    Quigley, Morgan, Conley, Ken, Gerkey, Brian, Faust, Josh, Foote, Tully, Leibs, Jeremy, Wheeler, Rob, Ng, Andrew Y et al. “ROS: An Open-Source Robot Operating System.” ICRA workshop on open source software, Vol. 3. 3.2: p. 5

  26. [26]

    Pytorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library

    Paszke, Adam, Gross, Sam, Massa, Francisco, Lerer, Adam, Bradbury, James, Chanan, Gregory, Killeen, Trevor, Lin, Zeming, Gimelshein, Natalia, Antiga, Luca et al. “Pytorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library.”Advancesinneuralinformationprocessingsystems Vol. 32 (2019)

  27. [27]

    FreeCAD Documentation: Work- bench Creation

    FreeCAD Community. “FreeCAD Documentation: Work- bench Creation.” (2024). URL https://wiki.freecad.org/ Workbench_creation

  28. [28]

    FreeCAD_Assembly4: Assembly Workbench for FreeCAD

    FreeCAD. “FreeCAD_Assembly4: Assembly Workbench for FreeCAD.” (2024). URL https://wiki.freecad.org/ Assembly4_Workbench

  29. [29]

    pivy_trackers: Interactive Coin3D Scenegraph Node Trackers for FreeCAD

    Graff, Joel. “pivy_trackers: Interactive Coin3D Scenegraph Node Trackers for FreeCAD.” (2019). URL https://github. com/joelgraff/pivy_trackers

  30. [30]

    The Pinocchio C++ Library: A Fast andFlexibleImplementationofRigidBodyDynamicsAlgo- rithms and Their Analytical Derivatives

    Carpentier, Justin, Saurel, Guilhem, Buondonno, Gabriele, Mirabel, Joseph, Lamiraux, Florent, Stasse, Olivier and Mansard, Nicolas. “The Pinocchio C++ Library: A Fast andFlexibleImplementationofRigidBodyDynamicsAlgo- rithms and Their Analytical Derivatives.”2019 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII): pp. 614–619. 2019. DOI 10.1109/...

  31. [31]

    2012AnthropometricSurveyofU.S.ArmyPersonnel: Meth- ods and Summary Statistics

    Gordon,ClaireC.,Blackwell,CynthiaL.,Bradtmiller,Bruce, Parham, Joseph L., Barrientos, Patricia, Paquette, Steven P., Corner, Brian D., Carson, Jeremy M., Venezia, Joseph C., Rockwell,BelvaM.,Mucher,MichaelandKristensen,Stacy. “2012AnthropometricSurveyofU.S.ArmyPersonnel: Meth- ods and Summary Statistics.” Technical Report No. TR-15-

  32. [32]

    Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center

    U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center. 2014

  33. [33]

    John Wiley & Sons (2009)

    Winter, David A.Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons (2009)

  34. [34]

    BodySegmentParam- eters

    Drillis,RudolfsandContini,Renato. “BodySegmentParam- eters.”TechnicalReportNo.1166-03.SchoolofEngineering and Science, New York University. 1966

  35. [35]

    An explicit finite-difference scheme with exact conservation properties

    de Leva, Paolo. “Adjustments to Zatsiorsky–Seluyanov’s Segment Inertia Parameters.”Journal of Biomechanics Vol. 29 No. 9 (1996): pp. 1223–1230. DOI 10.1016/0021- 9290(95)00178-6

  36. [36]

    The Mass and Inertia Characteristics of the Main Segments of the Human Body

    Zatsiorsky, Vladimir and Seluyanov, V. “The Mass and Inertia Characteristics of the Main Segments of the Human Body.”Biomechanics VIII-B. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL (1983): pp. 1152–1159

  37. [37]

    SMPL: A Skinned Multi-Person Linear Model

    Loper, Matthew, Mahmood, Naureen, Romero, Javier, Pons-Moll, Gerard and Black, Michael J. “SMPL: A Skinned Multi-Person Linear Model.”ACM Transactions on GraphicsVol. 34 No. 6 (2015): pp. 248:1–248:16. DOI 10.1145/2816795.2818013

  38. [38]

    Inverse Kinematics Positioning Using Nonlinear Programming for Highly Ar- ticulated Figures

    Zhao, Jianmin and Badler, Norman I. “Inverse Kinematics Positioning Using Nonlinear Programming for Highly Ar- ticulated Figures.”ACM Transactions on GraphicsVol. 13 No. 4 (1994): pp. 313–336. DOI 10.1145/195826.195827

  39. [39]

    A New Discomfort Function for Optimization-Based Posture Prediction

    Marler, R. Timothy, Rahmatalla, Salam, Shanahan, Meagan and Abdel-Malek, Karim. “A New Discomfort Function for Optimization-Based Posture Prediction.”SAE Technical PaperNo. 2005-01-2680 (2005). DOI 10.4271/2005-01- 2680

  40. [40]

    Physics-BasedModelingandSimulationofHumanWalking: A Review of Optimization-Based and Other Approaches

    Xiang, Yujiang, Arora, Jasbir S. and Abdel-Malek, Karim. “Physics-BasedModelingandSimulationofHumanWalking: A Review of Optimization-Based and Other Approaches.” Structural and Multidisciplinary OptimizationVol. 42 No. 1 (2010): pp. 1–23. DOI 10.1007/s00158-010-0496-8

  41. [41]

    Posture Prediction Models in Digital Human Modeling for Ergonomic Design: A Systematic Review

    Zhang, Mengjie, Nieuwenhuys, Arne and Zhang, Yanxin. “Posture Prediction Models in Digital Human Modeling for Ergonomic Design: A Systematic Review.”Medical Engineering & PhysicsVol. 143 No. 1 (2025): p. 104391. DOI 10.1016/j.medengphy.2025.104391

  42. [42]

    Oliphant, Matt Haberland, Tyler Reddy, David Cournapeau, Evgeni Burovski, Pearu Peterson, Warren Weckesser, Jonathan Bright, St´ efan J

    Virtanen, Pauli, Gommers, Ralf, Oliphant, Travis E., Haber- land, Matt, Reddy, Tyler, Cournapeau, David, Burovski, Ev- geni, Peterson, Pearu, Weckesser, Warren, Bright, Jonathan et al. “SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific ComputinginPython.”NatureMethodsVol.17No.3(2020): pp. 261–272. DOI 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

  43. [43]

    Pink: Python Inverse Kinematics Based on Pinocchio

    Caron, Stéphane. “Pink: Python Inverse Kinematics Based on Pinocchio.” (2022). URL https://github.com/ stephane-caron/pink

  44. [44]

    A Novel Platform to Enable the Future Human-Centered Factory

    Generosi,Andrea,Agostinelli,Thomas,Ceccacci,Silviaand Mengoni, Maura. “A Novel Platform to Enable the Future Human-Centered Factory.”The International Journal of AdvancedManufacturingTechnologyVol.122No.11(2022): pp. 4221–4233. DOI 10.1007/s00170-022-09880-z

  45. [45]

    RULA: A Survey Method for the Investigation of Work-Related Upper Limb Disorders

    McAtamney, Lynn and Corlett, E. Nigel. “RULA: A Survey Method for the Investigation of Work-Related Upper Limb Disorders.”Applied ErgonomicsVol. 24 No. 2 (1993): pp. 91–99. DOI 10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-S

  46. [46]

    Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA)

    Hignett, Sue and McAtamney, Lynn. “Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA).”Applied ErgonomicsVol. 31 No. 2 (2000): pp. 201–205. DOI 10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00039- 3

  47. [47]

    Correct- ing Working Postures in Industry: A Practical Method for Analysis

    Karhu, Osmo, Kansi, Pekka and Kuorinka, Iikka. “Correct- ing Working Postures in Industry: A Practical Method for Analysis.”Applied ErgonomicsVol. 8 No. 4 (1977): pp. 199–201. DOI 10.1016/0003-6870(77)90164-8

  48. [48]

    Revised NIOSH Equation for the Design and Evaluation of Manual Lifting Tasks

    Waters, Thomas R., Putz-Anderson, Vern, Garg, Arun and Fine, Lawrence J. “Revised NIOSH Equation for the Design and Evaluation of Manual Lifting Tasks.”Er- gonomicsVol. 36 No. 7 (1993): pp. 749–776. DOI 10.1080/00140139308967940

  49. [49]

    The Design of Manual Handling Tasks: Revised Tables of Maximum Acceptable Weights and Forces

    Snook, Stover H. and Ciriello, Vincent M. “The Design of Manual Handling Tasks: Revised Tables of Maximum Acceptable Weights and Forces.”ErgonomicsVol. 34 No. 9 (1991): pp. 1197–1213. DOI 10.1080/00140139108964855. 10

  50. [50]

    A Vision Modeling Framework for DHM Using Geometrically Estimated FoV

    Vinayak and Sen, Dibakar. “A Vision Modeling Framework for DHM Using Geometrically Estimated FoV.”Computer- Aided DesignVol. 44 No. 1 (2012): pp. 15–28. DOI 10.1016/j.cad.2011.01.003

  51. [51]

    Applications Manual for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equa- tion

    Waters, ThomasR., Putz-Anderson, VernonandGarg, Arun. “Applications Manual for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equa- tion.” Technical Report No. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94-110 (Revised 9/2021). Cincinnati, OH. 1994

  52. [52]

    Musculoskeletal Dis- orders as a Fatigue Failure Process: Evidence, Implications and ResearchNeeds

    Gallagher, Sean and Schall, Mark C. “Musculoskeletal Dis- orders as a Fatigue Failure Process: Evidence, Implications and ResearchNeeds.”ErgonomicsVol.60 No. 2(2017): pp. 255–269. DOI 10.1080/00140139.2016.1208848

  53. [53]

    Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc.Jack 8.0.1 Student Edition Tutorial(2013)

  54. [54]

    Neural Network for Dynamic Hu- man Motion Prediction

    Bataineh, Mohammad, Marler, Timothy, Abdel-Malek, Karim and Arora, Jasbir. “Neural Network for Dynamic Hu- man Motion Prediction.”Expert Systems with Applications Vol.48(2016): pp.26–34. DOI10.1016/j.eswa.2015.11.020. 11