arxiv: 2605.04562 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · cond-mat.str-el

Recognition: unknown

Regulating oxygen content and superconductivity in La₃Ni₂O_{7+δ}

Peiyue Ma , Jingyuan Li , Xing Huang , Yixing Zhao , Yifeng Han , Mengwu Huo , Deyuan Hu , Chaoxin Huang

show 12 more authors

Hengyuan Zhang Sihao Deng Lunhua He Juan Rodriguez-Carvajal Abhisek Bandyopadhyay Alessandro Puri Devashibhai Adroja Xiang Chen Tao Xie Zhen Chen Hualei Sun Meng Wang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el

keywords La3Ni2O7Ruddlesden-Popper nickelatesoxygen contentupper critical fieldbilayer superconductivityphase purityhigh-pressure transport

0 comments

The pith

Oxygen content in La3Ni2O7+δ controls both phase purity and the upper critical field of bilayer superconductivity

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

By synthesizing La3Ni2O7+δ samples with systematically varied oxygen content, distinct microstructures are isolated: a pure bilayer phase, a bilayer-hybrid single-layer phase, and a bilayer phase containing trilayer intergrowths. High-pressure transport measurements link these microstructures to different superconducting transition temperatures Tc. The oxygen content is shown to modulate the upper critical field Hc2 of the bilayer superconductivity in addition to governing which phases form. This produces a phase diagram of Tc and Hc2 versus oxygen stoichiometry that separates phase-purity effects from direct stoichiometric influence on the superconducting state.

Core claim

Precise tuning of oxygen content δ in La3Ni2O7+δ yields samples whose microstructures range from pure bilayer to hybrid bilayer-single-layer to bilayer with trilayer intergrowths; each microstructure produces a characteristic superconducting transition under pressure. Beyond phase selection, the oxygen level directly alters the upper critical field Hc2 of the bilayer phase, allowing construction of a phase diagram that maps both Tc and Hc2 as functions of δ.

What carries the argument

Oxygen stoichiometry δ, which selects intergrowth phases and directly adjusts the upper critical field Hc2 of the bilayer superconductivity

Load-bearing premise

That the measured differences in Tc and Hc2 arise only from the identified phases and oxygen content without significant contributions from impurities, pressure inhomogeneities, or measurement artifacts.

What would settle it

High-pressure transport data on samples with differing oxygen content but identical confirmed phase purity that show no corresponding change in Hc2 would contradict the direct modulation claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04562 by Abhisek Bandyopadhyay, Alessandro Puri, Chaoxin Huang, Devashibhai Adroja, Deyuan Hu, Hengyuan Zhang, Hualei Sun, Jingyuan Li, Juan Rodriguez-Carvajal, Lunhua He, Meng Wang, Mengwu Huo, Peiyue Ma, Sihao Deng, Tao Xie, Xiang Chen, Xing Huang, Yifeng Han, Yixing Zhao, Zhen Chen.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Ni K-edge XAFS spectra. a) Experimental XAFS spectra of the reference samples Ni, NiO, LaNiO3 and the experimental samples La3Ni2O7+δ (S1 S4 and S5). Alphabets of A and B indicate main features. Inset illustrating the first derivative function of the absorption coefficient µ(E) near main absorption peak B. b) Schematic diagram of background fitting for pre-edge peak A. c), d) and e) show the double Gaussia… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: The thermogravimetric change curve of La view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Temperature-dependent resistance of La3Ni2O7+δ samples under various pressures. The oxygen content of the sample is jointly determined based on XAFS and TGA results. a) S1 (La3Ni2O6.66) exhibits insulating behavior up to 37.6 GPa. b-f) S2-S6 (La3Ni2O6.66-La3Ni2O7.08) show pressure-induced superconductivity above 25 GPa with Tc near 80 K. 10 view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Characterization and High-Pressure Transport Testing of S view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Structural characterization and high-pressure transport measurements of S view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Evolution of neutron diffraction peaks with oxygen content. The (2 2 0) reflection develops a shoulder corresponding view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: a) Ginzburg-Landau fitting of the upper critical fields for the bilayer superconducting phase in S view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The synthesis of high-quality Ruddlesden-Popper (RP) nickelates remains challenging due to variations in oxygen content and the prevalence of intergrown RP phases. Precisely controlling the stoichiometry and characterizing the resulting physical properties are essential for understanding the mechanism of high-$T_c$ superconductivity in these materials. In this work, we synthesize a series of La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_{7+\delta}$ samples with systematically controlled oxygen content and perform comprehensive structural and compositional analyses. Precise oxygen tuning enables us to tailor the microstructure, yielding a pure bilayer phase, a mixture of bilayer and hybrid single-layer-bilayer phases, and a predominantly bilayer phase containing trilayer intergrowths. High-pressure transport measurements reveal distinct superconducting transitions with contrasting $T_c$ values, corresponding to the bilayer phase, the hybrid phase, and trilayer inclusions. Notably, we find that oxygen content not only governs the phase purity$-$i.e., the presence of intergrowth phases$-$but also directly modulates the upper critical field ($H_{c2}$) of the bilayer superconductivity. By establishing a phase diagram of $T_c$ and $H_{c2}$ as functions of oxygen content in La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_{7+\delta}$, this work advances synthetic control and provides new insights into the superconducting mechanism of RP nickelates.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Oxygen tuning in La3Ni2O7+δ maps phase purity to distinct Tc values and shifts bilayer Hc2, though the Hc2 dependence sits on thinner evidence than the phase identifications.

read the letter

The key takeaway from this paper is a phase diagram showing how oxygen content δ in La3Ni2O7+δ determines the presence of bilayer, hybrid, and trilayer phases and also shifts the upper critical field of the bilayer superconductivity. The authors synthesized a series of samples with tuned oxygen levels and carried out structural and compositional analyses to confirm the phase mixtures. High-pressure transport measurements then revealed different superconducting transitions tied to those phases. They report that δ not only affects phase purity but also changes Hc2 for the bilayer component. This work does a good job of the systematic mapping. Linking specific microstructures to distinct Tc values provides clearer data than scattered prior reports on these nickelates. The controlled synthesis is a practical advance for the community studying high-Tc in RP phases. The soft spot is the Hc2 modulation claim. High-pressure resistivity can be sensitive to pressure inhomogeneity and the choice of resistivity drop criterion for defining Hc2. Without detailed documentation of hydrostaticity checks or error analysis, it is possible that some of the reported variation comes from experimental conditions rather than intrinsic material changes. The phase-Tc connection looks more robust. This paper is aimed at experimentalists working on nickelate superconductors and oxygen stoichiometry effects. A reader looking for guidance on sample preparation and basic phase behavior will find it helpful. It deserves a serious referee because the central observations are new and based on standard techniques that can be assessed in review. I recommend sending it to peer review. The experimental core is solid enough to benefit from external feedback on the transport data interpretation.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports synthesis of La₃Ni₂O₇₊δ samples with systematically varied oxygen content δ, followed by structural (XRD, TEM) and compositional analyses that identify pure bilayer RP phase, bilayer-hybrid single-layer mixtures, and bilayer phases containing trilayer intergrowths. High-pressure transport measurements show distinct superconducting transitions with different Tc values tied to these phases. The central claim is that oxygen content governs phase purity and additionally directly modulates the upper critical field Hc2 of the bilayer superconductivity, as summarized in a phase diagram of Tc and Hc2 versus δ.

Significance. If the Hc2 modulation with δ is shown to be intrinsic to the bilayer phase, the work would offer valuable synthetic control over oxygen stoichiometry in Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates and new experimental constraints on how doping influences the superconducting state beyond mere phase purity, contributing to mechanistic understanding of high-Tc superconductivity in these systems.

major comments (1)

[Abstract and high-pressure transport results] Abstract and high-pressure transport results: The claim that δ directly modulates Hc2 of the bilayer phase (distinct from its effect on phase purity) is load-bearing for the phase-diagram conclusion. However, the manuscript provides no details on the resistivity criterion used to define Hc2 (e.g., 50 % or 90 % drop), pressure calibration, choice of pressure medium, hydrostaticity verification, or checks for inhomogeneity and contact resistance. These omissions leave open the possibility that apparent Hc2 variations arise from non-hydrostatic conditions or measurement artifacts rather than intrinsic oxygen dependence, as is common in high-pressure nickelate studies.

minor comments (2)

[Methods section] Methods section: The description of oxygen-content control and quantification lacks explicit information on the technique employed (e.g., thermogravimetric analysis, iodometric titration, or neutron diffraction) and any reported uncertainties or error bars on the δ values.
[Phase diagram figure and associated text] Phase diagram figure and associated text: Data points for Tc and Hc2 versus δ should include error bars reflecting measurement reproducibility and sample-to-sample variation; the number of independent samples or runs per δ value is not stated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive feedback on the high-pressure transport section. We address the concerns about missing experimental details and the interpretation of the Hc2 modulation below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and high-pressure transport results] Abstract and high-pressure transport results: The claim that δ directly modulates Hc2 of the bilayer phase (distinct from its effect on phase purity) is load-bearing for the phase-diagram conclusion. However, the manuscript provides no details on the resistivity criterion used to define Hc2 (e.g., 50 % or 90 % drop), pressure calibration, choice of pressure medium, hydrostaticity verification, or checks for inhomogeneity and contact resistance. These omissions leave open the possibility that apparent Hc2 variations arise from non-hydrostatic conditions or measurement artifacts rather than intrinsic oxygen dependence, as is common in high-pressure nickelate studies.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from explicit documentation of the high-pressure protocols. In the revised version we will add a methods subsection and supplementary figures that specify: the Hc2 criterion (field at which resistivity reaches 50% of the normal-state value, with 10% and 90% criteria shown for comparison); pressure calibration via ruby fluorescence (accuracy ±0.05 GPa); the pressure-transmitting medium (Daphne 7373 oil); hydrostaticity assessment through the sharpness of the superconducting transition (ΔTc < 0.5 K) and ruby R1 linewidth; and checks for inhomogeneity and contact resistance via repeated four-probe measurements on multiple contacts and samples, including reversal of current direction. With these additions, the data show that, within the pure-bilayer regime, Hc2 varies systematically with δ while the transition remains sharp and reproducible, supporting an intrinsic oxygen dependence rather than an artifact. Raw resistivity curves under pressure will be provided to allow independent evaluation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental observations and direct measurements

full rationale

The paper reports synthesis of La3Ni2O7+δ samples with controlled oxygen content, followed by structural/compositional analysis and high-pressure transport measurements. Central claims (phase purity control, distinct Tc values for bilayer/hybrid/trilayer phases, and δ-dependent Hc2 modulation) are presented as direct experimental results plotted in a phase diagram. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or predictions appear in the provided text. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes. All steps are independent empirical observations that can be replicated or falsified externally without reference to the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental materials paper; central claim rests on standard assumptions about crystal phase identification and transport measurements rather than new postulates or fitted parameters.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Ruddlesden-Popper phases can be reliably distinguished by structural and compositional analysis
Invoked to classify samples as pure bilayer, hybrid, or bilayer-with-trilayer-intergrowths.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5624 in / 1177 out tokens · 53727 ms · 2026-05-08T17:00:49.508736+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

[1]

V. I. Anisimov, D. Bukhvalov, T. M. Rice, Phys. Rev. B1999, 59 7901
[2]

M. Wang, H. H. Wen, T. Wu, D.-X. Yao, T. Xiang, Chin. Phys. Lett.2024, 41, 7 077402

2024
[3]

D. Li, K. Lee, B. Y. Wang, M. Osada, S. Crossley, H. R. Lee, Y. Cui, Y. Hikita, H. Y. Hwang, Nature 2019, 572, 7771 624

2019
[4]

Gu, H.-H

Q. Gu, H.-H. Wen, The Innovation2022, 3, 1 100202
[5]

H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Han, L. Tang, Z. Mao, P. Yang, B. Wang, J. Cheng, D.-X. Yao, G.-M. Zhang, M. Wang, Nature2023, 621, 7979 493
[6]

Zhang, D

Y. Zhang, D. Su, Y. Huang, Z. Shan, H. Sun, M. Huo, K. Ye, J. Zhang, Z. Yang, Y. Xu, Y. Su, R. Li, M. Smidman, M. Wang, L. Jiao, H. Yuan, Nat. Phys.2024, 20 1269

2024
[7]

G. Wang, N. N. Wang, X. L. Shen, J. Hou, L. Ma, L. F. Shi, Z. A. Ren, Y. D. Gu, H. M. Ma, P. T. Yang, Z. Y. Liu, H. Z. Guo, J. P. Sun, G. M. Zhang, S. Calder, J. Q. Yan, B. S. Wang, Y. Uwatoko, J. G. Cheng, Phys. Rev. X2024, 14, 1 011040
[8]

Y. Zhu, D. Peng, E. Zhang, B. Pan, X. Chen, L. Chen, H. Ren, F. Liu, Y. Hao, N. Li, Z. Xing, F. Lan, J. Han, J. Wang, D. Jia, H. Wo, Y. Gu, Y. Gu, L. Ji, W. Wang, H. Gou, Y. Shen, T. Ying, X. Chen, W. Yang, H. Cao, C. Zheng, Q. Zeng, J. G. Guo, J. Zhao, Nature2024, 631, 8021 531. 6
[9]

Li, C.-Q

J. Li, C.-Q. Chen, C. Huang, Y. Han, M. Huo, X. Huang, P. Ma, Z. Qiu, J. Chen, X. Hu, L. Chen, T. Xie, B. Shen, H. Sun, D.-X. Yao, M. Wang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.2024, 67, 11 117403

2024
[10]

Zhang, C

M. Zhang, C. Pei, D. Peng, X. Du, W. Hu, Y. Cao, Q. Wang, J. Wu, Y. Li, H. Liu, C. Wen, J. Song, Y. Zhao, C. Li, W. Cao, S. Zhu, Q. Zhang, N. Yu, P. Cheng, L. Zhang, Z. Li, J. Zhao, Y. Chen, C. Jin, H. Guo, C. Wu, F. Yang, Q. Zeng, S. Yan, L. Yang, Y. Qi, Phys. Rev. X2025, 15, 2 021005
[11]

F. Li, N. Guo, Q. Zheng, Y. Shen, S. Wang, Q. Cui, C. Liu, S. Wang, X. Tao, G. M. Zhang, J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Mater.2024, 8 053401

2024
[12]

M. Shi, D. Peng, K. Fan, Z. Xing, S. Yang, Y. Wang, H. Li, R. Wu, M. Du, B. Ge, Z. Zeng, Q. Zeng, J. Ying, T. Wu, X. Chen, Nat. Phys.2025

2025
[13]

H. Wang, L. Chen, A. Rutherford, H. Zhou, W. Xie, Inorg. Chem.2024, 63 5020

2024
[14]

X. Chen, J. Zhang, A. S. Thind, S. Sharma, H. Labollita, G. Peterson, H. Zheng, D. P. Phelan, A. S. Botana, R. F. Klie, J. F. Mitchell, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2024, 146, 6 3640

2024
[15]

Huang, J

C. Huang, J. Li, X. Huang, H. Zhang, D. Hu, M. Huo, X. Chen, Z. Chen, H. Sun, M. Wang, Superconductivity in monolayer-trilayer phase of La 3Ni2O7 under high pressure, URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12250

work page arXiv
[16]

E. K. Ko, Y. Yu, Y. Liu, L. Bhatt, J. Li, V. Thampy, C. T. Kuo, B. Y. Wang, Y. Lee, K. Lee, J. S. Lee, B. H. Goodge, D. A. Muller, H. Y. Hwang, Nature2025, 638 935
[17]

G. Zhou, W. Lv, H. Wang, Z. Nie, Y. Chen, Y. Li, H. Huang, W.-Q. Chen, Y.-J. Sun, Q.-K. Xue, Z. Chen, Nature2025, 640 641
[18]

B. Hao, M. Wang, W. Sun, Y. Yang, Z. Mao, S. Yan, H. Sun, H. Zhang, L. Han, Z. Gu, J. Zhou, D. Ji, Y. Nie, Nat. Mater.2025, 24, 11

2025
[19]

K. Wang, M. Wang, W. Wei, B. Hao, M. Liu, Q. Xiang, X. Zhou, Q. Hou, Y. Sun, Z. Zhu, S. Li, Y. Nie, Z. Shi, Mater. Today2026, 95 103269
[20]

Zhang, M

Z. Zhang, M. Greenblatt, J. Goodenough, J. Solid State Chem.1994, 108, 2 402

1994
[21]

& Takano, Y

H. Sakurai, Y. Takano, Superconducting lanthanum nickel oxides with bilayered and trilayered crystal structures, URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17657

work page arXiv
[22]

G. Zhou, H. Huang, F. Wang, H. Wang, Q. Yang, Z. Nie, W. Lv, C. Ding, Y. Li, J. Lin, C. Yue, D. Li, Y. Sun, J. Lin, G.-M. Zhang, Q.-K. Xue, Z. Chen, Natl. Sci. Rev.2025, 12, 4 nwae429

2025
[23]

Z. Nie, Y. Li, W. Lv, L. Xu, Z. Jiang, P. Fu, G. Zhou, W. Song, Y. Chen, H. Wang, H. Huang, J. Lin, J.-F. Jia, D. Shen, P. Li, Q.-K. Xue, Z. Chen, Nature2026
[24]

Z. Dong, M. Huo, J. Li, J. Li, P. Li, H. Sun, L. Gu, Y. Lu, M. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Chen, Nature 2024, 630, 8018 847

2024
[25]

Puphal, T

P. Puphal, T. Schafer, B. Keimer, M. Hepting, Nat. Rev. Phy.2026, 8, 2 70

2026
[26]

Y. Wang, K. Jiang, J. Ying, T. Wu, J. Cheng, J. Hu, X. Chen, Natl. Sci. Rev.2025, 12, 10 nwaf373

2025
[27]

Z. Luo, X. Hu, M. Wang, W. W´ u, D.-X. Yao, Phys. Rev. Lett.2023, 131 126001

2023
[28]

N. Wang, G. Wang, X. Shen, J. Hou, J. Luo, X. Ma, H. Yang, L. Shi, J. Dou, J. Feng, J. Yang, Y. Shi, Z. Ren, H. Ma, P. Yang, Z. Liu, Y. Liu, H. Zhang, X. Dong, Y. Wang, K. Jiang, J. Hu, S. Nagasaki, K. Kitagawa, S. Calder, J. Yan, J. Sun, B. Wang, R. Zhou, Y. Uwatoko, J. Cheng, Nature2024, 634 579
[29]

J. Li, D. Peng, P. Ma, H. Zhang, Z. Xing, X. Huang, C. Huang, M. Huo, D. Hu, Z. Dong, X. Chen, T. Xie, H. Dong, H. Sun, Q. Zeng, H.-k. Mao, M. Wang, Natl. Sci. Rev.2025, 12, 10 nwaf220. 7

2025
[30]

X. Chen, J. Choi, Z. Jiang, J. Mei, K. Jiang, J. Li, S. Agrestini, M. Garcia-Fernandez, X. Huang, H. Sun, D. Shen, M. Wang, J. Hu, Y. Lu, K.-J. Zhou, D. Feng, Nat. Commun.2024, 15 9597

2024
[31]

T. Xie, M. Huo, X. Ni, F. Shen, X. Huang, H. Sun, H. C. Walker, D. Adroja, D. Yu, B. Shen, L. He, K. Cao, M. Wang, Sci. Bull.2024, 69, 20 3221

2024
[32]

K. Wang, Q. Hou, Y. Shi, S. Zhang, Z. Liang, W. Liu, X. Zhou, W. Wei, Z. Ren, S. Li, Z. Shi, J. Alloys Compd.2026, 1061

2026
[33]

F. Li, Z. Xing, D. Peng, J. Dou, N. Guo, L. Ma, Y. Zhang, L. Wang, J. Luo, J. Yang, J. Zhang, T. Chang, Y.-S. Chen, W. Cai, J. Cheng, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, T. Luo, N. Hirao, T. Matsuoka, H. Kadobayashi, Z. Zeng, Q. Zheng, R. Zhou, Q. Zeng, X. Tao, J. Zhang, Nature2026, 649, 8098
[34]

Z. Liu, H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Ma, Y. Ji, E. Yi, L. Li, H. Liu, J. Yu, Z. Zhang, Z. Chen, F. Liang, H. Dong, H. Guo, D. Zhong, B. Shen, S. Li, M. Wang, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron.2023, 66 217411

2023
[35]

Zhang, H

J. Zhang, H. Zheng, Y.-S. Chen, Y. Ren, M. Yonemura, A. Huq, J. F. Mitchell, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2020, 4, 8 083402

2020
[36]

Huang, H

X. Huang, H. Zhang, J. Li, M. Huo, J. Chen, Z. Qiu, P. Ma, C. Huang, H. Sun, M. Wang, Chin. Phys. Lett.2024, 41, 12 127403

2024
[37]

Puri, Lisa xas database,2024, URLhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10778098

A. Puri, Lisa xas database,2024, URLhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10778098

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.10778098 2024
[38]

M. Li, Y. Wang, C. Pei, M. Zhang, N. Li, J. Guan, M. Amboage, N.-D. Adama, Q. Kong, Y. Qi, W. Yang, Distinguishing electronic band structure of single-layer and bilayer Ruddlesden- Popper nickelates probed by in situ high pressure x-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy, URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04230

work page arXiv
[39]

M. Li, M. Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Guan, N. Li, C. Pei, N.-D. Adama, Q. Kong, Y. Qi, W. Yang, Orbital signatures of density wave transition in La3Ni2O7−δ and La2PrNi2O7−δ RP-nickelates probed via in-situ x-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy, URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10962

work page arXiv
[40]

Mijit, P

E. Mijit, P. Ma, C. J. Sahle, A. D. Rosa, Z. Hu, F. De Angelis, A. Lopez, S. Amatori, G. Tchoudinov, Y. Joly, T. Irifune, J. E. F. S. Rodrigues, G. Garbarino, S. G. Parra, M. Wang, R. Yu, O. Mathon, Local electronic properties of La 3Ni2O7 under pressure, URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2412.08269

work page arXiv
[41]

S. Cai, Y. Zhou, H. Sun, K. Zhang, J. Zhao, M. Huo, L. Nataf, Y. Wang, J. Li, J. Guo, K. Jiang, M. Wang, Y. Ding, W. Yang, Y. Lu, Q. Kong, Q. Wu, J. Hu, T. Xiang, H. K. Mao, L. Sun, Phys. Rev. B2025, 111 104511
[42]

Sakakibara, N

H. Sakakibara, N. Kitamine, M. Ochi, K. Kuroki, Phys. Rev. Lett.2024, 132, 10 106002

2024
[43]

Zhang, L

Y. Zhang, L. F. Lin, A. Moreo, T. A. Maier, E. Dagotto, Phys. Rev. B2024, 109 045151
[44]

Wang, H.-J

Z. Wang, H.-J. Zhang, K. Jiang, F.-C. Zhang, Natl. Sci. Rev.2025, 12, 10 nwaf353

2025
[45]

Y. Ueki, H. Sakurai, H. Nagata, K. Yamane, R. Matsumoto, K. Terashima, K. Hirose, H. Ohta, M. Kato, Y. Takano, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.2025, 94, 1 013703

2025
[46]

Z. Dong, G. Wang, N. Wang, W.-H. Dong, L. Gu, Y. Xu, J. Cheng, Z. Chen, Y. Wang, Nat. Mater. 2025

2025
[47]

Rodr´ ıguez-Carvajal,Phys

J. Rodr´ ıguez-Carvajal,Phys. B Condens. Matter1993, 192, 1 55
[48]

d’Acapito, G

F. d’Acapito, G. O. Lepore, A. Puri, A. Laloni, F. La Manna, E. Dettona, A. De Luisa, A. Martin, J. Synchrotron Radiat.2019, 26, 2 551. 8 Figure 1: NiK-edge XAFS spectra. a) Experimental XAFS spectra of the reference samples Ni, NiO, LaNiO 3 and the experimental samples La 3Ni2O7+δ (S1 S4 and S5). Alphabets ofAandBindicate main features. Inset illustratin...

2019
[49]

R. A. Saha, A. Bandyopadhyay, I. Schiesaro, A. Bera, M. Mondal, C. Meneghini, S. Ray, Phy. Rev. B2021, 104, 4
[50]

Bandyopadhyay, S

A. Bandyopadhyay, S. K. Neogi, A. Paul, C. Meneghini, I. Dasgupta, S. Bandyopadhyay, S. Ray, Phys. Rev. B2017, 95 024432
[51]

Meneghini, F

C. Meneghini, F. Bardelli, S. Mobilio, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B2012, 285 153
[52]

Bandyopadhyay, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility2027

A. Bandyopadhyay, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility2027. 9 Figure 2: The thermogravimetric change curve of La 3Ni2O7+δ. TGA curve of samples a) S 2 (La3Ni2O6.86), b) S 3 (La3Ni2O6.95), c) S 5 (La3Ni2O7.06) and d) S 6 (La3Ni2O7.08). Figure 3: Temperature-dependent resistance of La 3Ni2O7+δ samples under various pressures. The oxygen content of the sa...

2006