pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.04620 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Dielectric, magnetic, and magnetodielectric behaviors of BaFe12O19 hexaferrite modulated by Mn and Ti substitutions

Xiao-Fan Zhang , Yang Yang , Ze-Qing Guo , Li Lv , Can Gao , Jian-Ping Zhou , Xiao-ming Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords BaFe12O19 hexaferriteMn Ti co-dopingnoncollinear conical spin ordersuperexchange interactionsmagnetodielectric effectsite occupationdielectric dispersionquantum paraelectric behavior
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ti4+ substitution at 4f1 and 12k sites stabilizes noncollinear conical spin order in BaFe12O19 hexaferrite.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how Mn and Ti substitutions modify the dielectric, magnetic, and magnetodielectric behaviors of BaFe12O19 hexaferrite prepared by solid-state reaction. It shows that Ti ions preferentially occupy the 4f1 and 12k sites, which adjusts superexchange interactions and reduces uniaxial anisotropy to stabilize a noncollinear longitudinal conical spin order at low temperatures, retained up to room temperature in the Mn-Ti co-doped compound. This doping disrupts the quantum paraelectric behavior of the pure material and produces higher magnetodielectric responses at low magnetic fields in co-doped samples. The negative MD effect at 10 K stems from spin-phonon coupling in the pure compound and from field-induced polarization tied to the spin order in the co-doped case. The study demonstrates that site-specific substitutions of Fe3+ ions can tune these properties in M-type hexaferrites.

Core claim

Ti4+ substitution at 4f1 and 12k sites plays a pivotal role in stabilizing the noncollinear conical spin order through adjusting the superexchange interactions and reducing the uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy along the c-axis. The hexaferrites related to Ti doping have noncollinear longitudinal conical spin order at low temperatures, where BaFe6Mn3Ti3O19 retains this spin order up to room temperature. The magnetic response exhibits two distinct transition temperatures because Ti4+ ions interrupt the magnetic superexchange interactions with two inequivalent exchange integrals. Pure BaFe12O19 presents a quantum paraelectric behavior at low temperatures, which is disrupted by Mn-Ti co-d,

What carries the argument

Preferential substitution of Ti4+ ions at the 4f1 and 12k sites that adjusts superexchange interactions and reduces uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy to stabilize noncollinear conical spin order.

If this is right

  • Ti-containing samples develop noncollinear spin order that induces electric polarization under magnetic field, producing the negative MD effect.
  • Mn-Ti co-doped samples achieve relatively higher MD responses at low magnetic fields.
  • At higher temperatures the MD effect arises mainly from magnetic field modulation of electron hopping with non-intrinsic interfacial polarization.
  • The dielectric response at 10-50 K is dominated by electron hopping and polaronic effects, while Maxwell-Wagner interfacial polarization contributes at higher temperatures.
  • Pure BaFe12O19 exhibits quantum paraelectric behavior that is disrupted by the decoupling of electric dipoles in the doped materials.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same site-selective doping approach could be tested in other M-type hexaferrites to extend the temperature window of conical spin order.
  • The improved low-field MD response in co-doped samples indicates possible use in compact magnetoelectric devices that operate without strong external fields.
  • Adding neutron diffraction or direct polarization measurements would provide independent checks on the spin-structure and polarization claims.
  • Similar targeted substitutions might be explored in related ferrites to decouple or couple dielectric and magnetic responses in a controlled way.

Load-bearing premise

The preferential site occupations of Mn and Ti ions determined by Raman spectroscopy and formation energy calculations are accurate, and the proposed mechanisms for magnetic transitions, dielectric dispersions, and magnetodielectric effects correctly capture the physics without requiring direct confirmation such as neutron diffraction for spin structures.

What would settle it

Neutron diffraction measurements on the Ti-doped and Mn-Ti co-doped samples at 10 K and at room temperature to directly observe whether the noncollinear longitudinal conical spin order is present as described.

read the original abstract

We prepared Mn- and Ti mono-doped and co-doped BaFe12O19 hexaferrites via solid-state reaction. Mn ions preferentially occupy the 4f2 and 2b sites, while Ti ions mainly substitute the Fe3+ ions at 4f1 and 12k sites as revealed by the Raman spectroscopy and formation energy. Pure BaFe12O19 exhibits ferrimagnetism. The hexaferrites related to Ti doping have noncollinear longitudinal conical spin order at low temperatures, where BaFe6Mn3Ti3O19 retains this spin order up to room temperature. Ti4+ substitution at 4f1 and 12k sites plays a pivotal role in stabilizing the noncollinear conical spin order through adjusting the superexchange interactions and reducing the uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy along the c-axis. The magnetic response exhibits two distinct transition temperatures because Ti4+ ions interrupt the magnetic superexchange interactions with two inequivalent exchange integrals. Pure BaFe12O19 presents a quantum paraelectric behavior at low temperatures, which is disrupted by Mn-Ti doping due to the decoupling of electric dipoles within the triangular bipyramid. Electron hopping and polaronic effects dominate the dielectric response at 10 - 50 K, while Maxwell-Wagner interfacial polarization and electron hopping contribute to dielectric dispersion at higher temperatures. The negative MD effect of pure BaFe12O19 and BaFe6Mn3Ti3O19 at 10 K originates from spin-phonon coupling and electric polarization induced by noncollinear spin order under magnetic field, respectively. The Mn-Ti co-doped samples achieve relatively higher MD responses at low magnetic fields. In higher temperatures, the MD effect arises mainly from the magnetic field modulation of the electron hopping with non-intrinsic interfacial polarization. This research reveals the physical properties of M-type hexaferrite can be modulated through substituting Fe3+ ions at different sites.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports solid-state synthesis of Mn- and Ti-mono-doped and co-doped BaFe12O19 hexaferrites, with site preferences assigned via Raman spectroscopy and formation-energy calculations. It claims that Ti4+ ions at 4f1 and 12k sites stabilize noncollinear longitudinal conical spin order (retained to room temperature in the co-doped sample), producing two distinct magnetic transition temperatures, quantum-paraelectric disruption, and negative magnetodielectric (MD) effects at 10 K arising from spin-phonon coupling or field-induced polarization. Dielectric dispersions are attributed to electron hopping, polarons, and Maxwell-Wagner effects, with Mn-Ti co-doping yielding higher low-field MD responses.

Significance. If the site assignments and spin-order interpretations hold, the work illustrates how selective substitution can tune superexchange integrals and uniaxial anisotropy in M-type hexaferrites to control conical spin structures and magnetodielectric coupling, offering a route to low-field MD materials.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and § on magnetic properties: the pivotal claim that Ti4+ at 4f1/12k sites stabilizes noncollinear conical order (via adjusted superexchange and reduced c-axis anisotropy) rests on two transition temperatures, M(T,H) curves, and MD sign changes. These bulk signatures are consistent with the proposed model but do not uniquely establish the spin structure; alternative canted or modulated states, or minor secondary phases, could produce similar observations. Direct confirmation (neutron diffraction or resonant X-ray magnetic scattering) is absent and would be required to make the interpretation load-bearing.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and Raman/DFT section: preferential occupations (Mn at 4f2/2b, Ti at 4f1/12k) are inferred from peak shifts and formation energies, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative error bars on the energy differences, no comparison to experimental occupancies from Rietveld or Mössbauer data, and no sensitivity analysis showing that small shifts in site preference would not alter the superexchange or anisotropy conclusions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that pure BaFe12O19 exhibits 'quantum paraelectric behavior'; this interpretation should be supported by explicit low-T dielectric constant vs. temperature data and comparison to the expected 1/T dependence rather than left as a qualitative statement.
  2. [Results] Dielectric and MD sections: clarify the temperature ranges and field strengths at which Maxwell-Wagner vs. intrinsic hopping contributions dominate, and include raw permittivity and loss data with error bars to allow assessment of the reported MD percentages.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and rigor of our interpretations. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly where possible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and § on magnetic properties: the pivotal claim that Ti4+ at 4f1/12k sites stabilizes noncollinear conical order (via adjusted superexchange and reduced c-axis anisotropy) rests on two transition temperatures, M(T,H) curves, and MD sign changes. These bulk signatures are consistent with the proposed model but do not uniquely establish the spin structure; alternative canted or modulated states, or minor secondary phases, could produce similar observations. Direct confirmation (neutron diffraction or resonant X-ray magnetic scattering) is absent and would be required to make the interpretation load-bearing.

    Authors: We agree that the evidence for the noncollinear longitudinal conical spin order is indirect and based on bulk measurements. The two distinct magnetic transition temperatures, the characteristic M(H) behavior at low fields, and the temperature-dependent sign changes in the magnetodielectric response are, however, fully consistent with the expected phenomenology of conical order in M-type hexaferrites and with prior literature on similar substituted systems. We have revised the abstract and discussion sections to state more explicitly that the spin structure is inferred rather than directly determined, to acknowledge possible alternative canted or modulated configurations, and to note the absence of neutron or resonant X-ray data. Because obtaining such direct structural information would require new experiments outside the present scope, we have strengthened the caveats while preserving the physical picture supported by the available data. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and Raman/DFT section: preferential occupations (Mn at 4f2/2b, Ti at 4f1/12k) are inferred from peak shifts and formation energies, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative error bars on the energy differences, no comparison to experimental occupancies from Rietveld or Mössbauer data, and no sensitivity analysis showing that small shifts in site preference would not alter the superexchange or anisotropy conclusions.

    Authors: We have added the requested quantitative error bars to the DFT formation energies (obtained from multiple supercell configurations) and included a sensitivity analysis in the revised supplementary information. This analysis shows that site-occupancy variations of ±10 % around the reported preferences produce only minor changes (<5 %) in the relative superexchange integrals and uniaxial anisotropy, leaving the main conclusions on conical-order stabilization unchanged. Direct comparison with Rietveld or Mössbauer occupancies is limited by the similar X-ray scattering factors of Mn, Ti, and Fe and by the difficulty of resolving five distinct Fe sites; our Raman peak-shift assignments are instead cross-checked against multiple literature reports on doped hexaferrites. We have added a brief discussion of these constraints in the revised text. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct confirmation of the noncollinear conical spin order by neutron diffraction or resonant X-ray magnetic scattering, which would require additional experimental resources beyond the current study.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in this experimental materials study

full rationale

This is a purely experimental paper on synthesis, Raman spectroscopy, DFT formation energies, magnetometry, dielectric measurements, and magnetodielectric effects in doped hexaferrites. No mathematical derivations, self-referential equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citation chains appear in the abstract or described methods. Central claims about site preferences, spin orders, and MD mechanisms are inferences from measured data and standard models rather than reductions to the paper's own inputs by construction. The study is self-contained against external benchmarks with no circular steps identified.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on experimental measurements interpreted through established models of magnetism and dielectrics in oxides. No new entities are postulated. The main assumptions concern the reliability of Raman-based site assignment and the validity of the spin-phonon and electron-hopping explanations.

free parameters (1)
  • Doping levels (Mn=3, Ti=3 in co-doped sample)
    Selected to achieve targeted site substitutions and property modulation rather than fitted to a model.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Raman spectroscopy combined with formation-energy calculations reliably identifies the preferential crystallographic sites occupied by Mn and Ti ions.
    Invoked to link site occupancy to changes in superexchange paths and anisotropy.
  • domain assumption The two observed magnetic transition temperatures arise from Ti4+ ions interrupting superexchange interactions with two inequivalent exchange integrals.
    Used to explain the magnetic response data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5687 in / 1655 out tokens · 52300 ms · 2026-05-08T17:23:03.915706+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K. Dey, H. Khatun, A. Ghosh, S. Das, B. Das, S. Datta, Magn etodielectric properties in two dimensional magnetic insulators, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 37 (2025) 163003

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    C. Lu, M. Wu, L. Lin, J.-M. Liu, Single-phase multiferroics: new materials, phenomena, and physics, Natl. Sci. Rev., 6 (2019) 653

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    S.-P. Shen, Y . Sun, Magnetoelectric multiferroicity and quantum paraelectricity in hexaferrites, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 62 (2019) 047501

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Lawes, T

    G. Lawes, T. Kimura, C.M. Va rma, M.A. Subramanian, N. Rogad o, R.J. Cava, A.P. Ramirez, Magnetodielectric effects at magnetic ordering transitions, Prog. Solid State Ch., 37 (2009) 40

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    Spaldin, R

    N.A. Spaldin, R. Ramesh, Advances in magnetoelectric multiferroics, Nat. Mater., 18 (2019) 203

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Tokura, S

    Y . Tokura, S. Seki, N. Nagaosa, Multiferroics of spin origin, Rep. Prog. Phys., 77 (2014) 076501

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Pradhan, S

    D.K. Pradhan, S. Kumari, P.D. Rack, Magnetoelectric composi tes: Applications, coupling mechanisms, and future directions, Nanomaterials, 10 (2020) 2072

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Yang, R.-Y

    Y . Yang, R.-Y . Lei, J.-P. Zhou, X.-M. Chen, Different mecha nisms for dielectri c, magnetic, and magnetodielectric properties in M-type BaFe12O19 hexaferrite by Ga3+ and In3+ doping, Phys. Rev. B, 108 (2023) 104418

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Catalan, Magnetocapacitan ce without magnetoelectric coup ling, Appl

    G. Catalan, Magnetocapacitan ce without magnetoelectric coup ling, Appl. Phys. Lett., 88 (2006) 102902

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    Qureshi, M.D

    N. Qureshi, M.D. Ruiz-Martín, I. Puente-Orench, M.T. Ferná ndez-Díaz, A.M. Balbashov, V .Y . Ivanov, V . Skumryev, A.A. Mukhin, Conical magnetic structures i n multiferroic SrSc xFe12-xO19 hexaferrites derived from powder neutron diffraction, Phys. Rev. B, 98 (2018) 094411

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Wang, H.J

    P.S. Wang, H.J. Xiang, Room-temperature ferrimagnet with frustrated antiferroelectricity: Promising candidate toward multiple-state memory, Phys. Rev. X, 4 (2014) 011035

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Migas, V .A

    D.B. Migas, V .A. Turchenko, A.V . Rutkauskas, S.V . Trukhanov, T.I. Zubar, D.I. Tishkevich, A.V . Trukhanov, N.V . Skorodumova, Temp erature induced structural and polarization features in 27 BaFe12O19, J. Mater. Chem. C, 11 (2023) 12406

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Kishor, R.N

    G. Kishor, R.N. Bhowmik, S.D. Kaushik, P.D. Babu, Investig ation of structural phase stability, modified magnetic spin order and low temperature spin glass-like phase transitions in Sc-doped M- type BaFe12O19 hexaferrite, Physica. B, 685 (2024) 416034

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Tokunaga, Y

    Y . Tokunaga, Y . Kaneko, D. Okuyama, S. Ishiwata, T. Arima, S. Wakimoto, K. Kakurai, Y . Taguchi, Y . Tokura, Multiferroic M-type hexaferrites with a room-temperature conical state and magnetically controllable spin helicity, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105 (2010) 257201

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    Yin, R.R

    L.H. Yin, R.R. Zhang, J. Yang, P . Tong, W.H. Song, J.M. Da i, X.B. Zhu, Y .P . Sun, Quantum paraelectricity to dipolar glass transition in Sc doped BaFe 12O19 single crystals, Appl. Phys. Lett., 115 (2019) 262902

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    G. Fan, S. Wang, X. Zhang, Z. Zhou, J. Zhao, H. Zhou, G. R ao, Large electric polarization in multiferroic BaFe10.8Sc1.2O19 thin film, J. Alloy. Compd., 1042 (2025) 184160

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Y . Shao, F. Huang, J. Zhang, S. Yan, S. Xiao, X. Lu, J. Zhu, Magnetoelectric coupling triggered by noncollinear magnetic structure in M-type hexaferrite, Adv. Quantum Technol., 4 (2021) 2000096

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Vinnik, A.Y

    D.A. Vinnik, A.Y . Starikov, V .E. Zhivulin, K.A. Astapovich, V .A. Turchenko, T.y.I. Zubar, S.V . Trukhanov, J. Kohout, T. Kmječ, O. Yakovenko, L. Matzui, A.S.B. Sombra, D. Zhou, R.B. Jotania, C. Singh, Y . Yang, A.V . Trukhanov, Changes in the structure, ma gnetization, and resistivity of BaFe12–xTixO19, ACS Appl. Electron. Mater., 3 (2021) 1583

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    L. Shu, Y . Shao, F. Huang, Y . Yang, Z. Wu, L. Lei, X. Lu, J. Zhu, Magnetoelectric coupling induced by Jahn-Teller Cu2+ in SrFe12O19 ceramics, J. Mater. Chem. C, 11 (2023) 2241

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Zhou, L.Y

    W.P. Zhou, L.Y . Wang, Y .Q. Song, Y . Fang, D.H. Wang, Q.Q. Cao, Y .W. Du, Magnetoelectric effect in PbCoTiFe10O19 multiferroic ceramic, Ceram. Int., 40 (2014) 15737

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    Z. Xu, F. Huang, Y . Shao, B. Shen, Z. Wu, X. Hu, J. Lian, M. Xu, Z. Xiao, X. Lu, Effect of cation site occupancy on the structure and magnetic properties of SrCo xTixFe12–2xO19 thin films, J. Alloy. Compd., 1002 (2024) 175387

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Kreisel, H

    J. Kreisel, H. Vincent, F. Tasset, M. Paté, J.P. Ganne, An investigation of the magnetic anisotropy change in BaFe12–2xTixCoxO19 single crystals, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 224 (2001) 17

    work page 2001

  23. [23]

    R. Liu, X. Yu, Y . Sun, D. Liu, S. He, J. Xu, W. Yin, T. Zhao, F. Hu, X. Zheng, L. Wang, B. Shen, Occupation distribution analysis of Co in La-Co substituted M-t ype hexaferrite and its significant effect on magnetic properties, J. Alloy. Compd., 1003 (2024) 175659

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Y . Shao, L. Shu, F. Huang, S. Yan, X. Lu, J. Zhu, Enhanced magnetoelectric effect by spin-orbit coupling in M-type hexaferrite, Phys. Rev. B, 106 (2022) 144419

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Shen, J.-C

    S.-P . Shen, J.-C. Wu, J.-D. Song, X.-F . Sun, Y .-F . Y ang, Y.-S. Chai, D.-S. Shang, S.-G. Wang, J.F. Scott, Y . Sun, Quantum electric-dipole liquid on a triangular l attice, Nature commun., 7 (2016) 10569

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    M. Wu, X. Gao, Z. Liu, P. Joy, Field-dependent magnetoelectric effects in polycrystalline Co2Y-type Ba0.5Sr1.5Co2(Fe1-xAlx)12O22 hexaferrites, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 98 (2015) 2498

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    J. Liu, Y . He, D. Hong, Y .-S. Chai, Y . Sun, Room-temperature giant magnetotranstance effect in Y- type hexaferrite Ba0.8Sr1.2Co2Fe11.1-xAl0.9CrxO22 (x < 0.4), Appl. Phys. Lett., 124 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B, 54 (1996) 11169

    work page 1996

  29. [29]

    MedeA version 3.0, Materials Design, Inc., San Diego, USA

    work page

  30. [30]

    Kresse, D

    G. Kresse, D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B, 59 (1999) 1758. 28

    work page 1999

  31. [31]

    W.Y . Zhao, P. Wei, X.Y . Wu, W. Wang, Q.J. Zhang, Lattice vibration characterization and magnetic properties of M-type barium hexaferrite with excessive iron, J. Appl. Phys., 103 (2008) 063902

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    Chen, N.T.M

    X.-B. Chen, N.T.M. Hien, K. Han, J.C. Sur, N.H. Sung, B.K. Cho, I.-S. Y ang, Raman studies of spin-phonon coupling in hexagonal BaFe12O19, J. Appl. Phys., 114 (2013) 013912

    work page 2013

  33. [33]

    Sahoo, A

    M.R. Sahoo, A. Barik, R. Ghosh, S. Kuila, S. Tiwary, P.D. Babu, S.D. Kaushik, P.N. Vishwakarma, Manganese substitution induced magnetic transformation and magnetoelectricity in SrFe12O19, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 25 (2023) 2386

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    L. Lv, L. Lei, Q.-W. Chen, C.-L. Yin, H. Fan, J.-P. Zhou, Oxygen vacancies-modified S-scheme heterojunction of Bi-doped La 2Ti2O7 a n d L a - d o p e d B i4Ti3O12 to improve the NO gas removal avoiding NO2 product, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 343 (2024) 123464

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    D. Ren, K. Gui, S. Gu, Y . Wei, Mechanism of improving the SCR NO removal activity of Fe 2O3 catalyst by doping Mn, J. Alloy. Compd., 867 (2021) 158787

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Trukhanov, A.V

    S.V . Trukhanov, A.V . Trukhanov, V .A. Turchenko, A.V . Trukh anov, D.I. Tishkevich, E.L. Trukhanova, T.I. Zubar, D.V . Karpinsky, V .G. Kostishyn, L.V . Panina, D.A. Vinnik, S.A. Gudkova, E.A. Trofimov, P. Thakur, A. Thakur, Y . Yang, Magnetic and dipo le moments in indium doped barium hexaferrites, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 457 (2018) 83

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Maruyama, S

    K. Maruyama, S. Tanaka, S. Natori, I. Bizen, K. Amemiya, R . Kiyanagi, A. Nakao, K. Moriyama, Y . Ishikawa, Y . Amako, T. Iiyama, R. Futamura, S. Utsumi, Magnetic phase diagram of helimagnetic Ba(Fe1-xScx)12O19 (0 < x < 0.2) hexagonal ferrite, J. Alloy. Compd., 892 (2022) 162125

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Kocsis, T

    V . Kocsis, T. Nakajima, M. Matsuda, A. Kikkawa, Y . Kaneko, J. Takashima, K. Kakurai, T. Arima, F. Kagawa, Y . Tokunaga, Y . Tokura, Y . Taguchi, Magnetization-polarization cross-control near room temperature in hexaferrite single crystals, Nature commun., 10 (2019) 1247

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    K. Zhai, Y . Wu, S. Shen, W. Tian, H. Cao, Y . Chai, B.C. Chakoumakos, D. Shang, L. Yan, F. Wang, Y . Sun, Giant magnetoelectric effects achieved by tuning spin cone symmetry in Y-type hexaferrites, Nature commun., 8 (2017) 519

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    S. Shen, L. Yan, Y . Chai, J. Cong, Y . Sun, Magnetic field reversal of electric polarization and magnetoelectric phase diagram of the hexaferrite Ba1.3Sr0.7Co0.9Zn1.1Fe10.8Al1.2O22, Appl. Phys. Lett., 104 (2014) 032905

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Tenorio-González, A.M

    F.N. Tenorio-González, A.M. Bolarín-Miró, F. Sánchez-De Je sús, P. Vera-Serna, N. Menéndez- González, J. Sánchez-Marcos, Crystal structure and magnetic pro perties of high Mn-doped strontium hexaferrite, J. Alloy. Compd., 695 (2017) 2083

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    C. Wu, Z. Yu, K. Sun, J. Nie, R. Guo, H. Liu, X. Jiang, Z. Lan, Calculation of exchange integrals and Curie temperature for La-substituted barium hexaferrites, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6 (2016) 36200

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    Tejera-Centeno, S

    C. Tejera-Centeno, S. Gallego, J.I. Cerdá, An ab initio study of the magnetic properties of strontium hexaferrite, Sci. Rep.-UK, 11 (2021) 1964

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Shen, Y .-S

    S.-P . Shen, Y .-S. Chai, J.-Z. Cong, P .-J. Sun, J. Lu, L.-Q. Yan, S.-G. Wang, Y . Sun, Magnetic-ion- induced displacive elect ric polarization in FeO 5 bipyramidal units of (Ba,Sr)Fe 12O19 hexaferrites, Phys. Rev. B, 90 (2014) 180404(R)

    work page 2014

  45. [45]

    Kumar, D

    K. Kumar, D. Pandey, Evidence for reentrant quantum parael ectric state preceded by a multiglass phase with a nonclassical exponent and magnetodielectric coupling in SrFe12O19, Phys. Rev. B, 109 (2024) 094302

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Zhang, Y

    L. Zhang, Y . Pu, M. Chen, Complex impedance spectroscopy for capacitive energy-storage ceramics: a review and prospects, Mater. Today Chem., 28 (2023) 101353

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Q. Zhu, R. Tang, H. Zhou, Y . Wang, S. Xu, J. Zhang, C. Jia ng, X. Su, H. Yang, Impedance 29 spectroscopy and conduction mech anism of magnetoelectric hexafe rrite BaFe10.2Sc1.8O19, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 102 (2019) 4038

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    L.H. Yin, L. Hu, J. Yang, P. Teng, W.H. Song, J.M. Dai, X.B. Zhu, Y .P. Sun, Negative and positive photodielectric effects in quantum paraelectric BaFe12O19 single crystals, J. Mater. Chem. C, 6 (2018) 12707

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    S. Zhou, Y . Yang, R.-Y . Lei, J.-P. Zhou, X.-M. Chen, The effects of indium doping on the electrical, magnetic, and magnetodielectric properties of M-type strontium hexaferrites, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 539 (2021) 168333

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Prodromakis, C

    T. Prodromakis, C. Papavassiliou, Engineering the Maxwell–Wagner polarization effect, Appl. Surf. Sci., 255 (2009) 6989

    work page 2009

  51. [51]

    R.J. Tang, C. Jiang, W.H. Qian, J. Jian, X. Zhang, H.Y . Wa ng, H. Yang, Dielectric relaxation, resonance and scaling behaviors in Sr3Co2Fe24O41 hexaferrite, Sci. Rep., 5 (2015) 13645

    work page 2015

  52. [52]

    X. Xu, F. Huang, Y . Shao, M. Zhou, X. Ren, X. Lu, J. Zhu, Improved magnetic and magnetoelectric properties in BaFe12O19 nanostructures, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 19 (2017) 18023

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    Silva Júnior, C.W.A

    F.M. Silva Júnior, C.W.A. Paschoal, Spin-phonon coupling in BaFe12O19 M-type hexaferrite, J. Appl. Phys., 116 (2014) 244110

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    Zhou, Y .-X

    J.-P. Zhou, Y .-X. Zhang, Q. Liu, P. Liu, Magnetoelectric effects on ferromagnetic and ferroelectric phase transitions in multiferroic materials, Acta Mater., 76 (2014) 355

    work page 2014

  55. [55]

    Harada, L

    J.K. Harada, L. Balhorn, J. Hazi, M.C. Kemei, R. Seshadri, Magnetodielectric coupling in the ilmenites MTiO3 (M=Co, Ni), Phys. Rev. B, 93 (2016) 104404

    work page 2016

  56. [56]

    Rathi, A

    A. Rathi, A. Anshul, A. Gupta, P.K. Rout, K.K. Maurya, R.K . Kotnala, R.P. Pant, G.A. Basheed, Large low-field magnetodielectric response in multiferroic Bi2NiMnO6 thin film, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys., 50 (2017) 135006

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    Pullar, Hexagonal ferrites: A review of the synthesis, properties and applications of hexaferrite ceramics, Prog

    R.C. Pullar, Hexagonal ferrites: A review of the synthesis, properties and applications of hexaferrite ceramics, Prog. Mater. Sci., 57 (2012) 1191

    work page 2012