pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.04866 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · 💻 cs.IT · eess.SP· math.IT

Recognition: unknown

Phased Ultra Massive Array (PUMA)

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 16:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IT eess.SPmath.IT
keywords PUMAfluid antenna systemsphased arrayinterference mitigationsingle RF chainmassive connectivity6Ganalog combining
0
0 comments X

The pith

PUMA combines fluid antenna position flexibility with analog phased array combining at the user equipment to suppress co-user interference spatially without channel state information or complex cancellation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces the phased ultra massive array (PUMA) as a multiple access scheme that leverages the position flexibility of fluid antennas at each user device along with a phased array for combining received signals. This design allows the user equipment to suppress interference from other users directly in the spatial domain through analog phase shifts and summation. As a result, the base station does not need to perform precoding based on channel state information, and users avoid heavy digital interference cancellation. Theoretical rate analysis and simulations indicate that this leads to superior performance compared to fluid antenna multiple access and compact ultra massive array approaches, especially when each user has only one radio frequency chain. The framework aims to support efficient, scalable connectivity for many devices in next-generation wireless networks.

Core claim

By equipping user equipment with fluid antennas whose positions can be adjusted and aggregating signals via an analog phased array, PUMA enables each device to select and combine antenna elements in a way that maximizes the desired signal while minimizing interference from co-users, all without requiring channel state information at the base station or complex processing at the receiver. This architecture maintains high antenna gain with very few RF chains.

What carries the argument

The PUMA architecture, which integrates fluid antenna systems at the UE with analog phased array signal aggregation to achieve spatial interference mitigation through phase shifting and combining.

If this is right

  • Single-RF-chain UEs achieve higher data rates in multi-user interference-limited settings than with prior architectures.
  • Interference mitigation occurs in the analog domain at each UE, eliminating the need for CSI-based precoding at the base station.
  • Hardware requirements drop to as few as one RF chain per UE while preserving high effective antenna gain.
  • The scheme scales to large numbers of users sharing spectrum for massive connectivity without added digital processing overhead.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Real-time adjustment of fluid antenna positions could further improve performance if movement occurs within channel coherence time.
  • The analog-domain selectivity might complement other 6G techniques such as integrated sensing and communication.
  • Uplink extensions could reduce interference arriving at the base station by the same spatial mechanism.
  • Practical deployment would require verifying how well analog combining holds up under hardware imperfections like phase noise.

Load-bearing premise

The spatial flexibility of fluid antennas at the user equipment, when combined with analog phased array signal aggregation, can inherently mitigate co-user interference in the spatial domain without CSI for precoding at the BS or complex cancellation at each UE.

What would settle it

Measurements or simulations in a multi-user scenario showing that single-RF-chain PUMA devices do not achieve higher achievable rates than FAMA or CUMA devices under the same channel and interference conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04866 by Chenguang Rao, Dazhi He, Hanjiang Hong, Hyundong Shin, Kai-Kit Wong, Xusheng Zhu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of a downlink PUMA system. the aggregation process. The UE receiver only requires NRF downconversion RF chains, thereby significantly reducing the hardware complexity of the receiver. B. Phased Array and Port Activation Schemes To design the port activation schemes jointly with the phase shifters in PUMA, our objective is to maximize the average received SINR. Without loss of generality, we as… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Empirical and analytical results of PDFs for view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Average data rate performance of PUMA with QPSK modul view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The rate performance of PUMA with different shortlis view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The rate performance of PUMA with different view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The BLER performance of PUMA against U, under (a) rich scattering, and (b) finite scattering with mutual coupling. 0.2 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 10-2 10-1 100 (a) Rich Scattering 0.2 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 10-2 10-1 100 (b) Finite Scattering view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The BLER performance of PUMA agains spectral efficien view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The spectral efficiency against the number of UEs, view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper proposes a novel multiple-access framework, termed the phased ultra massive antenna array (PUMA), which exploits the distinctive spatial flexibility of fluid antenna systems (FAS) at the user equipment (UE). Building upon fluid antenna multiple access (FAMA) and compact ultra-massive antenna array (CUMA), PUMA incorporates a phased array for signal aggregation. This architecture enables the UE to inherently mitigate co-user interference within the spatial domain without necessitating channel state information (CSI) for precoding at the base station (BS) or complex interference cancellation at each UE. A primary advantage of PUMA lies in its hardware efficiency: by implementing phase shifting and signal combining in the analog domain, it achieves high antenna gain while requiring only a minimal number of radio-frequency (RF) chains, potentially a single RF chain. Comprehensive theoretical analysis of the achievable data rate is provided, complemented by extensive simulations that validate the framework. The results demonstrate that PUMA markedly outperforms FAMA and CUMA architectures, particularly for UEs with a single RF chain, offering a robust and scalable solution for interference-insensitive massive connectivity in sixth-generation (6G) systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes the Phased Ultra Massive Array (PUMA) architecture, which integrates fluid antenna systems (FAS) at the UE with analog phased-array signal aggregation. It claims this enables spatial-domain co-user interference mitigation without CSI-based precoding at the BS or complex cancellation at UEs, while using only a single RF chain for high antenna gain. The work provides theoretical analysis of achievable rates and simulations demonstrating marked outperformance over FAMA and CUMA, particularly for single-RF-chain UEs, as a scalable solution for interference-insensitive massive connectivity in 6G.

Significance. If the interference-mitigation mechanism and rate gains are rigorously validated, PUMA would represent a hardware-efficient advance for massive access in 6G by combining FAS spatial flexibility with analog combining to reduce digital processing and CSI requirements. This builds directly on FAMA and CUMA and could address scalability limits in massive MIMO with limited RF chains.

major comments (2)
  1. [System Model / Achievable Rate Analysis] System model and achievable-rate analysis: The central claim requires that FAS position selection plus analog phase combining can achieve |h^H w_own| ≫ |h^H w_k| (k ≠ own) when the BS uses fixed (non-CSI) precoders w_k. With a single RF chain the combiner is a phase vector, so the effective channel remains a scalar multiple of the position-dependent h; the manuscript must explicitly derive or bound the probability that a position exists which sufficiently nulls multiple interferers, accounting for spatial correlation across the fluid region, or the SINR remains interference-limited.
  2. [Simulation Results] Simulation setup and results: The reported outperformance over FAMA and CUMA must specify the BS precoding strategy (fixed beams vs. other), the number of co-users, the fluid-region size and correlation model, and include error bars or statistical significance tests on the rate curves; without these the validation of the 'markedly outperforms' claim cannot be assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'comprehensive theoretical analysis' and 'extensive simulations'; these should be explicitly cross-referenced to the relevant theorems, equations, or figures in the main text.
  2. [Notation / System Model] Clarify the exact analog combining vector and how it interacts with the FAS position selection in the notation and derivations to avoid ambiguity in the effective channel definition.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on the PUMA manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions we will incorporate to improve clarity and rigor.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [System Model / Achievable Rate Analysis] System model and achievable-rate analysis: The central claim requires that FAS position selection plus analog phase combining can achieve |h^H w_own| ≫ |h^H w_k| (k ≠ own) when the BS uses fixed (non-CSI) precoders w_k. With a single RF chain the combiner is a phase vector, so the effective channel remains a scalar multiple of the position-dependent h; the manuscript must explicitly derive or bound the probability that a position exists which sufficiently nulls multiple interferers, accounting for spatial correlation across the fluid region, or the SINR remains interference-limited.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee pointing out the need for an explicit probabilistic characterization. The manuscript's rate analysis is performed under the premise that the fluid antenna position is selected to realize strong desired-signal combining and interference suppression via analog phases, which is feasible due to the continuous spatial flexibility of FAS. To strengthen this, we will add a dedicated derivation in the revised version that bounds the probability of existence of a suitable position (accounting for the spatial correlation function over the fluid region) such that the effective |v^H h^H w_own| substantially exceeds the interference terms for the considered number of co-users. This will demonstrate that the operating regime is not interference-limited. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Simulation Results] Simulation setup and results: The reported outperformance over FAMA and CUMA must specify the BS precoding strategy (fixed beams vs. other), the number of co-users, the fluid-region size and correlation model, and include error bars or statistical significance tests on the rate curves; without these the validation of the 'markedly outperforms' claim cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that full specification of the simulation parameters is required for proper assessment. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly state that the BS employs fixed (non-CSI) precoding beams, report the exact number of co-users, the fluid-region size, and the correlation model, and augment all rate curves with error bars obtained from a large number of Monte-Carlo realizations together with statistical significance indicators. These additions will make the performance comparison fully reproducible and transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The abstract and description introduce the PUMA architecture as a novel combination of fluid antenna systems at the UE with analog phased-array aggregation. It claims this enables spatial-domain interference mitigation without BS CSI or UE-side cancellation, supported by a theoretical achievable-rate analysis and simulations showing outperformance over FAMA and CUMA. No equations, parameter-fitting steps, or derivation chains are exhibited that reduce any result to a self-definition, a renamed input, or a load-bearing self-citation. The central performance claims rest on the proposed hardware architecture and its validation, which are presented as independent of the inputs. Self-references to prior FAMA/CUMA work are normal background and not used to force the new result by construction. This is the expected honest non-finding for an architecture paper whose math and benchmarks are not shown to collapse into tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are detailed beyond the high-level proposal of the PUMA architecture itself.

invented entities (1)
  • PUMA architecture no independent evidence
    purpose: Enables spatial interference mitigation and high gain with minimal RF chains via fluid antennas and analog phased combining
    Newly proposed framework whose performance claims rest on unshown theoretical analysis and simulations

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5514 in / 1250 out tokens · 29323 ms · 2026-05-08T16:23:06.744934+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    6G takes shape,

    J. G. Andrews, T. E. Humphreys and T. Ji, “6G takes shape,” IEEE BITS Inf. Theory Mag. , vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 2–24, Mar. 2024

  2. [2]

    Ultradense cell-free massive MIMO for 6G: Technical overv iew and open questions,

    H. Q. Ngo, G. Interdonato, E. G. Larsson, G. Caire and J. G. Andrews, “Ultradense cell-free massive MIMO for 6G: Technical overv iew and open questions,” Proc. IEEE , vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 805–831, Jul. 2024

  3. [3]

    An overvi ew on economic analysis of internet of everything,

    N. Ding, X. Ouyang, L. Gao, J. Huang and G. Xing, “An overvi ew on economic analysis of internet of everything,” IEEE Commun. Surv. & Tut., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 3742–3771, Dec. 2025

  4. [4]

    6G internet of things: A comprehensive survey,

    D. C. Nguyen et al. , “6G internet of things: A comprehensive survey,” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 359–383, Jan. 2022

  5. [5]

    Distributed learning methodologies for massive machine t ype commu- nication,

    M. V . da Silva, E. Eldeeb, M. Shehab, H. Alves and R. D. Souz a, “Distributed learning methodologies for massive machine t ype commu- nication,” IEEE Internet Things Mag. , vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 102–108, Jan. 2025

  6. [6]

    Extremely large-scale MIMO: Fundamentals, chal- lenges, solutions, and future directions,

    Z. Wang et al. , “Extremely large-scale MIMO: Fundamentals, chal- lenges, solutions, and future directions,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 117–124, Jun. 2024

  7. [7]

    Multiple access techniques for intelligent and multifunctional 6G: Tutorial, survey, and outlook,

    B. Clerckx et al. , “Multiple access techniques for intelligent and multifunctional 6G: Tutorial, survey, and outlook,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 832–879, Jul. 2024

  8. [8]

    Unveiling the potential of NOMA: A journey to next generation multiple access,

    A. Ahmed et al. , “Unveiling the potential of NOMA: A journey to next generation multiple access,” IEEE Commun. Surv. & Tut. , vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 3099–3164, Oct. 2025

  9. [9]

    Fluid antenna multiple access,

    K. K. Wong and K. F. Tong, “Fluid antenna multiple access, ” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 4801–4815, Jul. 2022

  10. [10]

    Fluid antenna multiple access for 6G: A holistic review,

    H. Hong et al., “Fluid antenna multiple access for 6G: A holistic review,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. , vol. 7, pp. 2607–2633, 2026

  11. [11]

    Fluid ante nna system for 6G: When Bruce Lee inspires wireless communications,

    K. K. Wong, K. F. Tong, Y . Zhang, and Z. Zheng, “Fluid ante nna system for 6G: When Bruce Lee inspires wireless communications,” Elect. Lett., vol. 56, no. 24, pp. 1288–1290, Nov. 2020

  12. [12]

    Flu id antenna systems,

    K. K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K. F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Flu id antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950–1962, Mar. 2021

  13. [13]

    A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hard- ware designs,

    W. K. New et al. , “A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hard- ware designs,” IEEE Commun. Surv. & Tut. , vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2325– 2377, Aug. 2025

  14. [14]

    Fluid antennas: Reshaping intrinsic properties for flexible radiation characteristics in intelligent wireles s networks,

    W.-J. Lu et al. , “Fluid antennas: Reshaping intrinsic properties for flexible radiation characteristics in intelligent wireles s networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 40–45, May 2025

  15. [15]

    A contemporary survey on fluid antenna systems: Fundamentals and networking perspectives,

    H. Hong et al. , “A contemporary survey on fluid antenna systems: Fundamentals and networking perspectives,” IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng., vol. 13, pp. 2305–2328, 2026

  16. [16]

    Fluid antenna systems: Redefining reconfigurable wireless communications,

    W. K. New et al. , “Fluid antenna systems: Redefining reconfigurable wireless communications,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. , vol. 44, pp. 1013–1044, 2026

  17. [17]

    Design and experimental validation of mmWave surface wave enabled fluid antennas for future wireless communicati ons,

    Y . Shen et al., “Design and experimental validation of mmWave surface wave enabled fluid antennas for future wireless communicati ons,” IEEE Antennas & Wireless Propag. Lett. , vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1467–1471, Apr. 2026

  18. [18]

    Electromagnetically reconfigurable fluid antenna system for wireless communications: Design, modeling, algorithm , fabrication, and experiment,

    R. Wang et al., “Electromagnetically reconfigurable fluid antenna system for wireless communications: Design, modeling, algorithm , fabrication, and experiment,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. , vol. 44, pp. 1464– 1479, 2026

  19. [19]

    P ro- grammable meta-fluid antenna for spatial multiplexing in fa st fluctuating radio channels,

    B. Liu, K.-F. Tong, K. K. Wong, C.-B. Chae, and H. Wong, “P ro- grammable meta-fluid antenna for spatial multiplexing in fa st fluctuating radio channels,” Optics Express, vol. 33, no. 13, pp. 28898–28915, 2025

  20. [20]

    Fluid antenna systems enabled by reconfigurable holographic surfaces: Beamforming design and experimenta l validation,

    S. Zhang et al. , “Fluid antenna systems enabled by reconfigurable holographic surfaces: Beamforming design and experimenta l validation,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. , vol. 44, pp. 1417–1431, 2026

  21. [21]

    A novel pixel-based reconfigurable antenna applied in fluid antenna systems with high switching speed,

    J. Zhang et al. , “A novel pixel-based reconfigurable antenna applied in fluid antenna systems with high switching speed,” IEEE Open J. Antennas & Propag. , vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 212–228, Feb. 2025

  22. [22]

    Wideban d pixel-based fluid antenna system: An antenna design for smar t city,

    B. Liu, T. Wu, K. K. Wong, H. Wong, and K. F. Tong, “Wideban d pixel-based fluid antenna system: An antenna design for smar t city,” IEEE Internet of Things J. , vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 6850–6862, Feb. 2026

  23. [23]

    A new spatial block-correlation model for fluid antenna systems,

    P . Ram´ ırez-Espinosa, D. Morales-Jimenez and K. K. Won g, “A new spatial block-correlation model for fluid antenna systems, ” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 15829–15843, Nov. 2024

  24. [24]

    Flu id antenna system: New insights on outage probability and dive rsity gain,

    W. K. New, K. K. Wong, H. Xu, K. F. Tong and C.-B. Chae, “Flu id antenna system: New insights on outage probability and dive rsity gain,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 128–140, Jan. 2024

  25. [25]

    Fluid antenna systems: A geometric approach to error probability and fundamental limits,

    X. Zhu et al. , “Fluid antenna systems: A geometric approach to error probability and fundamental limits,” arXiv preprint , arXiv:2509.08815, Sept. 2025

  26. [26]

    A new analy tical ap- proximation of the fluid antenna system channel,

    M. Khammassi, A. Kammoun and M.-S. Alouini, “A new analy tical ap- proximation of the fluid antenna system channel,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 8843–8858, Dec. 2023

  27. [27]

    Finite-blocklength fluid antenna systems,

    Z. Zhang et al. , “Finite-blocklength fluid antenna systems,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2509.15643v2, Apr. 2026

  28. [28]

    Channel estimation for FAS-assisted multiuser mmWave systems,

    H. Xu et al. , “Channel estimation for FAS-assisted multiuser mmWave systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 632–636, Mar. 2024

  29. [29]

    Successive Bayesian reconstructor for channel estimation in fluid antenna syste ms,

    Z. Zhang, J. Zhu, L. Dai and R. W. Heath, Jr., “Successive Bayesian reconstructor for channel estimation in fluid antenna syste ms,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1992–2006, Mar. 2025

  30. [30]

    On performance of RIS-aided fluid antenna systems,

    F. Rostami Ghadi et al. , “On performance of RIS-aided fluid antenna systems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 2175–2179, Aug. 2024

  31. [31]

    Fluid reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Joint on-off selection and beamforming with discrete phase shifts,

    H. Xiao et al. , “Fluid reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Joint on-off selection and beamforming with discrete phase shifts,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 3124–3128, Oct. 2025

  32. [32]

    Fluid anten na- assisted ISAC systems,

    L. Zhou, J. Y ao, M. Jin, T. Wu and K. -K. Wong, “Fluid anten na- assisted ISAC systems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 3533–3537, Dec. 2024

  33. [33]

    On fundamental limits for fluid antenna-assisted integrated sensing and communications for unsourced rando m access,

    Z. Zhang, et al. , “On fundamental limits for fluid antenna-assisted integrated sensing and communications for unsourced rando m access,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 44, pp. 136–149, 2026

  34. [34]

    Fluid antenna system-assisted self-interference cance l- lation for in-band full duplex communications,

    H. Hong et al. , “Fluid antenna system-assisted self-interference cance l- lation for in-band full duplex communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 7476–7489, 2026

  35. [35]

    Full-duplex FAS-assisted base station for ISAC,

    B. Tang et al. , “Full-duplex FAS-assisted base station for ISAC,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 25, pp. 2922–2938, 2026. 13

  36. [36]

    FAS meets OFDM: Enabling wideband 5G NR,

    H. Hong et al., “FAS meets OFDM: Enabling wideband 5G NR,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 12884–12898, Nov. 2025

  37. [37]

    Fast fluid an tenna multiple access enabling massive connectivity,

    K. K. Wong, K. F. Tong, Y . Chen, and Y . Zhang, “Fast fluid an tenna multiple access enabling massive connectivity,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 711–715, Feb. 2023

  38. [38]

    Slow fluid antenna multiple access,

    K. K. Wong, D. Morales-Jimenez, K. F. Tong, and C. B. Chae , “Slow fluid antenna multiple access,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 2831–2846, May 2023

  39. [39]

    Revisiting outage probability analysis for two-user flui d antenna multiple access system,

    H. Xu et al. , “Revisiting outage probability analysis for two-user flui d antenna multiple access system,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 9534–9548, Aug. 2024

  40. [40]

    Slow fluid antenna multiple access with multiport receivers,

    J. P . Gonz´ alez-Coma and F. J. L ´ opez-Mart´ ınez, “Slow fluid antenna multiple access with multiport receivers,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 15, pp. 1280–1284, 2026

  41. [41]

    On fundamental limits of slow-fluid antenna multiple access for unsourced random access,

    Z. Zhang, et al. , “On fundamental limits of slow-fluid antenna multiple access for unsourced random access,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 3455–3459, Nov. 2025

  42. [42]

    Multi-port selection for FAMA: Massive connectivity with fewer RF chains than users,

    H. Hong et al. , “Multi-port selection for FAMA: Massive connectivity with fewer RF chains than users,” arXiv preprint , arXiv:2511.17897, Nov. 2025

  43. [43]

    5G-coded fl uid antenna multiple access over block fading channels,

    H. Hong, K. K. Wong, K. F. Wong, H. Xu and H. Li, “5G-coded fl uid antenna multiple access over block fading channels,” Elect. Lett. , vol. 61, no. 1, Jan. 2025

  44. [44]

    Cod ed fluid antenna multiple access over fast fading channels,

    H. Hong, K. K. Wong, K. F. Tong, H. Shin, and Y . Zhang, “Cod ed fluid antenna multiple access over fast fading channels,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1249–1253, Apr. 2025

  45. [45]

    Turbochar ging fluid antenna multiple access,

    N. Waqar, K. K. Wong, C.-B. Chae and R. Murch, “Turbochar ging fluid antenna multiple access,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 25, pp. 4038–4052, 2026

  46. [46]

    Downlink OFDM-FAMA in 5G-NR systems,

    H. Hong et al. , “Downlink OFDM-FAMA in 5G-NR systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 10116–10132, Dec. 2025

  47. [47]

    Compact ultra mass ive antenna array: A simple open-loop massive connectivity sch eme,

    K. K. Wong, C. B. Chae, and K. F. Tong, “Compact ultra mass ive antenna array: A simple open-loop massive connectivity sch eme,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6279–6294, Jun. 2024

  48. [48]

    Compact ultra massive array (CUMA) with 4 RF chains for massive connectivity,

    K. K. Wong, “Compact ultra massive array (CUMA) with 4 RF chains for massive connectivity,” in Proc. IEEE Int. W orkshop Sig. Proc. Adv. Wireless Commun. (SPAWC) , pp. 286–290, 10-13 Sept. 2024, Lucca, Italy

  49. [49]

    Geometric port selection in CUMA Systems,

    C. Rao et al. , “Geometric port selection in CUMA Systems,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2509.20299, Sept. 2025

  50. [50]

    A compact D-band phase shifter with 0.1-degree phase resolution and ultra-low phase error in 65-nm CMOS,

    T. Uchino et al., “A compact D-band phase shifter with 0.1-degree phase resolution and ultra-low phase error in 65-nm CMOS,” IEEE J. Solid- State Circuits, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 3566–3576, Oct. 2025

  51. [51]

    150 GHz-band compact phased-array AiP module for XR applications toward 6G,

    Y . Morishita et al. , “150 GHz-band compact phased-array AiP module for XR applications toward 6G,” IEEE Microw. Wireless Technol. Lett. , vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 920–923, June 2025

  52. [52]

    Extra-larg e MIMO enabling slow fluid antenna massive access for millimeter-w ave bands,

    K. K. Wong, K. F. Tong, Y . Chen, and Y . Zhang, “Extra-larg e MIMO enabling slow fluid antenna massive access for millimeter-w ave bands,” IET Elect. Lett. , vol. 58, no. 25, pp. 1016–1018, Dec. 2022

  53. [53]

    On clustered statistical MIM O millimeter wave channel simulation,

    S. Buzzi and C. D’Andrea, “On clustered statistical MIM O millimeter wave channel simulation,” arXiv preprint , arXiv:1604.00648v2, May 2016

  54. [54]

    Impact of antenna coupling on 2 × 2 MIMO communications,

    B. Clerckx, C. Craeye, D. V anhoenacker-Janvier, and C. Oestges, “Impact of antenna coupling on 2 × 2 MIMO communications,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 1009–1018, May 2007

  55. [55]

    Analysis of mutual coupling bet ween a finite phased array of dipoles and its feed network,

    K. M. Lee and R.-S. Chu, “Analysis of mutual coupling bet ween a finite phased array of dipoles and its feed network,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 1681–1699, Dec. 1988

  56. [56]

    Mutual coupling in p hased arrays: A review,

    H. Singh, H. L. Sneha, and R. M. Jha, “Mutual coupling in p hased arrays: A review,” Int. J. Antennas Propag., vol. 2013, no. 1, pp. 348123, Apr. 2013

  57. [57]

    A new approximation for av erage symbol error probability over log-normal channels,

    V . Khandelwal and Karmeshu, “A new approximation for av erage symbol error probability over log-normal channels,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 58–61, Feb. 2014

  58. [58]

    NR; Physical layer procedures for data,

    “NR; Physical layer procedures for data,” Available [O nline]: https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/38 series/38.214/38214-i40.zip, Last Accessed on 2024-09-23

  59. [59]

    Processes Derived from the Normal,

    David Middleton, “Processes Derived from the Normal,” An Introduction to Statistical Communication Theory: An IEEE Press Classic Reissue, IEEE, 1996, pp.396-437

  60. [60]

    Billingsley, Probability and Measure (Probability and Mathematical Statistics), 3rd ed

    P . Billingsley, Probability and Measure (Probability and Mathematical Statistics), 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 1995

  61. [61]

    6-7 Definite integrals of special functions,

    D. Zwillinger, V . Moll, I. S. Gradshteyn, and I. M. Ryzhi k, “6-7 Definite integrals of special functions,” Table of Integrals, Series, and Products (Eighth Edition) , Academic Press, 2014, pp. 637–775