pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.04912 · v2 · submitted 2026-05-06 · 🧮 math.PR · math.ST· stat.TH

Can the L¹-L^infty duality be restored for non-dominated families of probability measures?

Irene Klein , Georg K\"ostenberger This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 21:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.PR math.STstat.TH
keywords non-dominated measuresmodel uncertaintyL1-L infinity dualityprobability space extensionquasi-sure analysisrobust statisticshypothesis testing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Extending the probability space restores the L¹-L∞ duality for non-dominated families of measures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

When a single probability measure is replaced by a non-dominated family P, the classical duality identifying L∞ as the dual of L¹ no longer holds. The paper constructs a canonical extension of the probability space under which the space of functions bounded quasi-surely with respect to P becomes isometrically isomorphic to the dual of the signed measures that are absolutely continuous with respect to at least one probability in P. This extension is the smallest P-complete enlargement of the original sigma-algebra with the duality property. The result applies to prominent examples including infinite product measures, Gaussian processes with uncertain parameters, the Black-Scholes model with uncertain volatility, and robust binomial trees. It also unifies prior approaches and extends a classical characterization of unbiased hypothesis tests to the non-dominated setting.

Core claim

On the extended model, the space L∞(P) of P-quasi-surely bounded functions is isometrically isomorphic to the dual of the space of finite signed measures that are absolutely continuous with respect to at least one element of P. The extension is canonical in that it is the smallest P-complete extension for which L∞(P) serves as such a dual.

What carries the argument

The canonical P-complete extension of the original sigma-algebra, defined as the smallest extension making L∞(P) the dual of the space of P-absolutely continuous signed measures.

If this is right

  • The duality holds for infinite product measures, Gaussian processes, and the Black-Scholes model with uncertain volatility.
  • The construction is equivalent to the capacity-based approach of prior frameworks under the stated assumptions.
  • Kraft's characterization of strictly unbiased hypothesis tests extends directly to non-dominated families.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Classical duality arguments become available for robust optimization and risk measures after the space extension.
  • Many functional-analytic results that rely on L¹-L∞ duality now admit direct non-dominated versions.
  • The same enlargement technique may restore other dualities, such as those involving L^p spaces for p greater than 1.

Load-bearing premise

The family P must satisfy the mild conditions that ensure the canonical extension matches the capacity-based approach and restores the duality.

What would settle it

A specific non-dominated family of measures for which the canonical extension fails to produce an isometric isomorphism between L∞(P) and the dual of the absolutely continuous signed measures.

read the original abstract

The duality $L^{\infty}\simeq (L^{1})'$ frequently breaks down in the presence of model uncertainty, where a single reference measure $P$ is replaced by a non-dominated family of probability measures $\mathcal{P}$. The unavailability of classical measure-theoretic and functional-analytic tools in this regime poses a significant obstacle to developing robust probabilistic frameworks. We show that this duality can be restored for a broad class of robust statistical models by extending the underlying probability space. Specifically, on the extended model, the space $\mathbb{L}^{\infty}(\mathcal{P})$ of $\mathcal{P}$-quasi-surely bounded functions is isometrically isomorphic to the dual of the space of finite signed measures absolutely continuous with respect to at least one element of $\mathcal{P}$. The proposed extension is canonical: it is the smallest $\mathcal{P}$-complete extension of the original $\sigma$-algebra for which $\mathbb{L}^{\infty}(\mathcal{P})$ is the dual of any normed space. Our assumptions encompass several prominent non-dominated settings, including infinite product measures, Gaussian processes, the Black-Scholes model with uncertain constant volatility and drift, robust binomial models, and, more generally, infinite sequences from any parametric model with almost surely estimable parameters. Furthermore, we unify the existing frameworks of Cohen (2012) and Liebrich et al. (2022), demonstrating that our construction is equivalent to the capacity-based approach under mild assumptions satisfied by the aforementioned examples. Finally, we apply our theory to extend Kraft's (1955) characterization of strictly unbiased hypothesis tests to non-dominated cases.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the L^1-L^∞ duality can be restored for non-dominated families of probability measures by means of a canonical extension of the underlying sigma-algebra. On this extended space, L^∞(P) is isometrically isomorphic to the dual of the space of finite signed measures that are absolutely continuous with respect to at least one measure in the family P. The extension is the smallest P-complete one with this property, applies to several standard non-dominated models (infinite products, Gaussian processes, uncertain Black-Scholes, etc.), unifies Cohen (2012) and Liebrich et al. (2022), and extends Kraft's characterization of unbiased tests.

Significance. Restoring this duality in a canonical way would be a valuable contribution to the theory of robust statistics and model uncertainty, as it would allow the use of classical functional analysis tools in settings where they typically fail. The unification of existing frameworks and the application to hypothesis testing add to its potential impact, provided the technical claims on minimality and equivalence hold.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and construction section] The central claim that the proposed extension is the smallest P-complete extension such that L^∞(P) is the dual of the space of finite signed measures absolutely continuous w.r.t. at least one P in P is load-bearing (Abstract). The skeptic's concern about whether the construction is minimal (i.e., does not add unnecessary sets) needs to be addressed with a precise argument showing that any proper sub-extension fails the duality.
  2. [Unification section] The statement that the construction is equivalent to the capacity-based approach under mild conditions for the listed families (infinite products, Gaussian processes, uncertain Black-Scholes) is crucial for the unification claim (Abstract). Please verify explicitly for at least one parametric family that the mild conditions hold and that the duality coincides exactly with Cohen (2012) and Liebrich et al. (2022).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation] Ensure consistent use of L^∞ vs. mathbb{L}^∞ and P vs. mathcal{P} throughout the manuscript.
  2. [References] The references to Cohen (2012) and Liebrich et al. (2022) should include full bibliographic details for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive feedback. The comments help clarify the presentation of the minimality and unification claims. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested clarifications in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and construction section] The central claim that the proposed extension is the smallest P-complete extension such that L^∞(P) is the dual of the space of finite signed measures absolutely continuous w.r.t. at least one P in P is load-bearing (Abstract). The skeptic's concern about whether the construction is minimal (i.e., does not add unnecessary sets) needs to be addressed with a precise argument showing that any proper sub-extension fails the duality.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit argument for minimality strengthens the central claim. The construction is defined as the intersection of all P-complete sigma-algebras on which the duality holds, which by definition yields the smallest such extension. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in the construction section proving that any proper sub-extension fails the duality: specifically, if a set A is omitted, one can construct a signed measure absolutely continuous w.r.t. some P in P whose associated functional on L^∞(P) cannot be represented by any bounded measurable function on the smaller sigma-algebra. This argument uses only the definition of the dual and the P-completeness requirement. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Unification section] The statement that the construction is equivalent to the capacity-based approach under mild conditions for the listed families (infinite products, Gaussian processes, uncertain Black-Scholes) is crucial for the unification claim (Abstract). Please verify explicitly for at least one parametric family that the mild conditions hold and that the duality coincides exactly with Cohen (2012) and Liebrich et al. (2022).

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit verification for one parametric family would make the unification claim more concrete. The manuscript already states that the mild conditions (sigma-compactness of the parameter space and almost-sure estimability) are satisfied by the listed families, but we will add a short appendix subsection that carries out the verification in full detail for the uncertain Black-Scholes model. There we will show that the generated sigma-algebra coincides with the one induced by the capacity and that the dual spaces are identical, thereby recovering the duality of Cohen (2012) and Liebrich et al. (2022) as a special case. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; construction is self-contained via explicit extension

full rationale

The paper defines a canonical P-complete extension of the original sigma-algebra via standard measure-theoretic completion operations and proves that L^∞(P) becomes the dual of the indicated space of signed measures on this extension. This is shown to coincide with capacity-based duality under explicitly stated mild conditions satisfied by the listed families (infinite products, Gaussian processes, uncertain Black-Scholes, etc.). The minimality claim is established by verifying that any smaller extension fails the dual property, without reducing the duality statement to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation. The unification with Cohen (2012) and Liebrich et al. (2022) is presented as an equivalence proof under those conditions rather than an imported ansatz. No step equates the claimed isomorphism to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The report is based solely on the abstract; therefore the precise axioms, free parameters, and invented entities cannot be audited in detail. The construction appears to rest on standard functional-analysis results and the domain assumption that P is non-dominated.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard results of functional analysis (e.g., Hahn-Banach, Riesz representation) hold on the extended space
    Invoked to obtain the isometric isomorphism
  • domain assumption The family P is non-dominated and satisfies the mild conditions listed for the examples
    Required for the extension to restore duality and unify prior frameworks
invented entities (1)
  • Canonical P-complete extension of the original sigma-algebra no independent evidence
    purpose: To make L^∞(P) the dual of the appropriate measure space
    New object introduced by the construction; no independent evidence supplied in the abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5594 in / 1483 out tokens · 48495 ms · 2026-05-14T21:54:33.985340+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Annals of Applied Probability, 27(4):2270–2304, 2017

    B.AcciaioandM.Larsson.Semi-staticcompletenessandrobustpricingbyinformedinvestors. Annals of Applied Probability, 27(4):2270–2304, 2017. 42 IRENE KLEIN, GEORG KÖSTENBERGER

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    A model- free version of the fundamental theorem of asset pricing and the super-replication theorem

    Beatrice Acciaio, Mathias Beiglböck, Friedrich Penkner, and Walter Schachermayer. A model- free version of the fundamental theorem of asset pricing and the super-replication theorem. Mathematical Finance, 26(2):233–251, 2016

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Contracting on ambiguous prospects.The Economic Journal, 127(606):2241–2262, 04 2017

    Massimiliano Amarante, Mario Ghossoub, and Edmund Phelps. Contracting on ambiguous prospects.The Economic Journal, 127(606):2241–2262, 04 2017

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Pathwise superhedging on prediction sets

    Daniel Bartl, Michael Kupper, and Ariel Neufeld. Pathwise superhedging on prediction sets. Finance and Stochastics, 24(1):215–248, January 2020. Publisher Copyright: 2019, Springer- Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Brown, and Constantine Caramanis

    Dimitris Bertsimas, David B. Brown, and Constantine Caramanis. Theory and applications of robust optimization.SIAM Review, 53(3):464–501, 2011

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Biagini, B

    S. Biagini, B. Bouchard, C. Kardaras, and M. Nutz. Robust fundamental theorem for con- tinuous processes.Mathematical Finance, 27(4):963–987, 2015

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    N. Bingham. Finite additivity versus countable additivity.Electronic Journal for History of Probability and Statistics, 6(1):1–35, 2010

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    No arbitrage with multiple-priors in discrete time

    Romain Blanchard and Laurence Carassus. No arbitrage with multiple-priors in discrete time. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 130(11):6657–6688, 2020

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Arbitrage and duality in nondominated discrete-time models.Annals of Applied Probability, 25(2):823–859, 2015

    Bruno Bouchard and Marcel Nutz. Arbitrage and duality in nondominated discrete-time models.Annals of Applied Probability, 25(2):823–859, 2015

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Pointwise arbi- trage pricing theory in discrete time.Mathematics of Operations Research, 44(3):1034–1057, 2019

    Matteo Burzoni, Marco Frittelli, Zhaoxu Hou, Marco Maggis, and Jan Obłój. Pointwise arbi- trage pricing theory in discrete time.Mathematics of Operations Research, 44(3):1034–1057, 2019

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Pricing without no-arbitrage condition in dis- crete time.Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 505(1):125441, 2022

    Laurence Carassus and Emmanuel Lépinette. Pricing without no-arbitrage condition in dis- crete time.Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 505(1):125441, 2022

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Huy N. Chau. On robust fundamental theorems of asset pricing in discrete time.SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 15(3):571–600, 2024

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Chau, Masaaki Fukasawa, and Miklós Rásonyi

    Huy N. Chau, Masaaki Fukasawa, and Miklós Rásonyi. Super-replication with transaction costs under model uncertainty for continuous processes.Mathematical Finance, 32(4):1066– 1085, 2022

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Choquet expectation and Peng’sg-expectation

    Zengjing Chen, Tao Chen, and Matt Davison. Choquet expectation and Peng’sg-expectation. Ann. Probab., 33(3):1179–1199, 2005

    work page 2005

  15. [15]

    Quasi-sure analysis, aggregation and dual representations of sublinear expec- tations in general spaces.Electronic Journal of Probability, 17(none):1 – 15, 2012

    Samuel Cohen. Quasi-sure analysis, aggregation and dual representations of sublinear expec- tations in general spaces.Electronic Journal of Probability, 17(none):1 – 15, 2012

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    Nonlinear continuous semimartingales.Electronic Journal of Probability, 28:1–40, 2023

    David Criens and Lars Niemann. Nonlinear continuous semimartingales.Electronic Journal of Probability, 28:1–40, 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Nonlinear semimartingales and Markov processes with jumps.J

    David Criens and Lars Niemann. Nonlinear semimartingales and Markov processes with jumps.J. Evol. Equ., 25(1):Paper No. 21, 39, 2025

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Quantitative Halmos-Savage theorems and robust large financial markets

    Christa Cuchiero, Irene Klein, Georg Köstenberger, and Thorsten Schmidt. Quantitative Halmos-Savage theorems and robust large financial markets.Preprint, arXiv:2504.06686, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Mark H. A. Davis and David G. Hobson. The range of traded option prices.Mathematical Finance, 17(1):1–14, 2007

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    Denis and M

    L. Denis and M. Kervarec. Optimal investment under model uncertainty in nondominated models.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 51(3):1803–1822, 2013

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    Denis and C

    L. Denis and C. Martini. A theoretical framework for the pricing of contingent claims in the presence of model uncertainty.Annals of Applied Probability, 16(2):827–852, 2006

    work page 2006

  22. [22]

    Function spaces and capacity related to a sub- linear expectation: Application to G-Brownian motion paths.Potential Analysis, 34(2):139– 161, 2010

    Laurent Denis, Mingshang Hu, and Shige Peng. Function spaces and capacity related to a sub- linear expectation: Application to G-Brownian motion paths.Potential Analysis, 34(2):139– 161, 2010

    work page 2010

  23. [23]

    Dubins and Leonard J

    Lester E. Dubins and Leonard J. Savage.How to gamble if you must. Inequalities for sto- chastic processes. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York-Toronto-London-Sydney, 1965

    work page 1965

  24. [24]

    Affine processes under parameter uncertainty.Probability, uncertainty and quantitative risk, 4, 2019

    Tolulope Fadina, Ariel Neufeld, and Thorsten Schmidt. Affine processes under parameter uncertainty.Probability, uncertainty and quantitative risk, 4, 2019

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    D. H. Fremlin.Measure theory. Vol. 3. Torres Fremlin, Colchester, 2002. Measure Algebras

    work page 2002

  26. [26]

    D. H. Fremlin.Measure theory. Vol. 2. Torres Fremlin, Colchester, 2003. Broad foundations, Corrected second printing of the 2001 original

    work page 2003

  27. [27]

    Classical and deep pricing for path-dependent options in non-linear generalized affine models.International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 27(02):2450016, 2024

    Benedikt Geuchen, Katharina Oberpriller, and Thorsten Schmidt. Classical and deep pricing for path-dependent options in non-linear generalized affine models.International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 27(02):2450016, 2024. CAN THEL 1-L∞ DUALITY BE RESTORED? 43

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior.Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18(2):141–153, 1989

    Itzhak Gilboa and David Schmeidler. Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior.Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18(2):141–153, 1989

    work page 1989

  29. [29]

    Halmos and L

    Paul R. Halmos and L. J. Savage. Application of the Radon-Nikodym Theorem to the Theory of Sufficient Statistics.The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 20(2):225 – 241, 1949

    work page 1949

  30. [30]

    Hampel, Elvezio M

    Frank R. Hampel, Elvezio M. Ronchetti, Peter J. Rousseeuw, and Werner A. Stahel.Robust statistics. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics: Probability and Mathe- matical Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1986. The approach based on influence functions

    work page 1986

  31. [31]

    Robust pricing–hedging dualities in continuous time.Finance and Stochastics, 22:511 – 567, 2018

    Zhaoxu Hou and Jan Obłój. Robust pricing–hedging dualities in continuous time.Finance and Stochastics, 22:511 – 567, 2018

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Extended conditionalG-expectations and related stopping times.Probab

    Mingshang Hu and Shige Peng. Extended conditionalG-expectations and related stopping times.Probab. Uncertain. Quant. Risk, 6(4):369–390, 2021

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Huber and Elvezio M

    Peter J. Huber and Elvezio M. Ronchetti.Robust statistics. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, second edition, 2009

    work page 2009

  34. [34]

    Huber and Volker Strassen

    Peter J. Huber and Volker Strassen. Minimax Tests and the Neyman-Pearson Lemma for Capacities.The Annals of Statistics, 1(2):251 – 263, 1973

    work page 1973

  35. [35]

    Jensen’s inequality forg-convex function underg-expectation

    Guangyan Jia and Shige Peng. Jensen’s inequality forg-convex function underg-expectation. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 147(1-2):217–239, 2010

    work page 2010

  36. [36]

    On equivalence of infinite product measures.Ann

    Shizuo Kakutani. On equivalence of infinite product measures.Ann. of Math. (2), 49:214–224, 1948

    work page 1948

  37. [37]

    R. L. Karandikar. On pathwise stochastic integration.Stochastic Processes and their Appli- cations, 57(1):11–18, 1995

    work page 1995

  38. [38]

    Shreve.Brownian motion and stochastic calculus, volume 113 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics

    Ioannis Karatzas and Steven E. Shreve.Brownian motion and stochastic calculus, volume 113 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 1991

    work page 1991

  39. [39]

    Houghton Mifflin, 1921

    Frank Hyneman Knight.Risk, uncertainty and profit, volume 31. Houghton Mifflin, 1921

    work page 1921

  40. [40]

    Some conditions for consistency and uniform consistency of statistical proce- dures.University of California Publication in Statistics, pages 125–141, 1955

    Charles Kraft. Some conditions for consistency and uniform consistency of statistical proce- dures.University of California Publication in Statistics, pages 125–141, 1955

    work page 1955

  41. [41]

    A complete characterization of testable hypotheses.Preprint, arXiv:2601.05217, 2026

    Martin Larsson, Johannes Ruf, and Aaditya Ramdas. A complete characterization of testable hypotheses.Preprint, arXiv:2601.05217, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    Springer Series in Statis- tics

    Lucien Le Cam.Asymptotic methods in statistical decision theory. Springer Series in Statis- tics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986

    work page 1986

  43. [43]

    Model uncertainty: A reverse approach.SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 13(3):1230–1269, 2022

    Felix-Benedikt Liebrich, Marco Maggis, and Gregor Svindland. Model uncertainty: A reverse approach.SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 13(3):1230–1269, 2022

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Ambiguity aversion, robustness, and the variational representation of preferences.Econometrica, 74(6):1447–1498, 2006

    Fabio Maccheroni, Massimo Marinacci, and Aldo Rustichini. Ambiguity aversion, robustness, and the variational representation of preferences.Econometrica, 74(6):1447–1498, 2006

    work page 2006

  45. [45]

    Financial options and statistical prediction intervals.The Annals of Statistics, 31(5):1413–1438, 2003

    Per Aslak Mykland. Financial options and statistical prediction intervals.The Annals of Statistics, 31(5):1413–1438, 2003

    work page 2003

  46. [46]

    Neufeld and M

    A. Neufeld and M. Nutz. Robust utility maximization with Lèvy processes.Mathematical Finance, 28(1):82–105, 2018

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Nonlinear Lévy processes and their characteristics.Transac- tions of the American Mathematical Society, 369(1):69–95, 2017

    Ariel Neufeld and Marcel Nutz. Nonlinear Lévy processes and their characteristics.Transac- tions of the American Mathematical Society, 369(1):69–95, 2017

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    S. Peng. G-expectation, G-Brownian motion and related stochastic calculus of Itô’s type. In Benth et. al., editor,Stochastic Analysis and Applications, the Abel Symposium 2005, Abel Symposia, pages 541–567. Springer-Verlag, 2006

    work page 2005

  49. [49]

    Nonlinear expectations, nonlinear evaluations and risk measures

    Shige Peng. Nonlinear expectations, nonlinear evaluations and risk measures. InStochastic methods in finance, volume 1856 ofLecture Notes in Math., pages 165–253. Springer, Berlin, 2004

    work page 2004

  50. [50]

    G-expectation, G-Brownian motion and related stochastic calculus of Itô type

    Shige Peng. G-expectation, G-Brownian motion and related stochastic calculus of Itô type. Stochastic Analysis and Applications, pages 541–567, 2007

    work page 2007

  51. [51]

    Springer, Berlin, 2019

    Shige Peng.Nonlinear expectations and stochastic calculus under uncertainty, volume 95 of Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling. Springer, Berlin, 2019

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    G-Gaussian processes under sublinear expectations andq-Brownian motion in quantum mechanics.Numer

    Shige Peng. G-Gaussian processes under sublinear expectations andq-Brownian motion in quantum mechanics.Numer. Algebra Control Optim., 13(3-4):583–603, 2023

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    A complete representation theorem for G-martingales.Stochastics, 86(4):609–631, 2014

    Shige Peng, Yongsheng Song, and Jianfeng Zhang. A complete representation theorem for G-martingales.Stochastics, 86(4):609–631, 2014

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    I. R. Petersen, M. R. James, and P. Dupuis. Minimax optimal control of stochastic uncer- tain systems with relative entropy constraints.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 45(3):398–412, 2000. 44 IRENE KLEIN, GEORG KÖSTENBERGER

    work page 2000

  55. [55]

    Frameworks and results in distributionally robust optimization.Open Journal of Mathematical Optimization, 3:1–85, July 2022

    Hamed Rahimian and Sanjay Mehrotra. Frameworks and results in distributionally robust optimization.Open Journal of Mathematical Optimization, 3:1–85, July 2022

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    Springer Series in Statistics

    Helmut Rieder.Robust asymptotic statistics. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994

    work page 1994

  57. [57]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2019

    Peng Shige.Nonlinear Expectations and Stochastic Calculus under Uncertainty with Robust CLT and G-Brownian Motion. Springer Science & Business Media, 2019

    work page 2019

  58. [58]

    Shreve.Stochastic calculus for finance

    Steven E. Shreve.Stochastic calculus for finance. I. Springer Finance. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004. The binomial asset pricing model

    work page 2004

  59. [59]

    On general minimax theorems.Pacific J

    Maurice Sion. On general minimax theorems.Pacific J. Math., 8(1):171–176, 1958

    work page 1958

  60. [60]

    Quasi-sure stochastic analysis through aggre- gation.Electronic Journal of Probability, 16(0):1844–1879, 2011

    Mete Soner, Nizar Touzi, and Jianfeng Zhang. Quasi-sure stochastic analysis through aggre- gation.Electronic Journal of Probability, 16(0):1844–1879, 2011

    work page 2011

  61. [61]

    Tevzadze, T

    R. Tevzadze, T. Toronjadze, and T. Uzunashvili. Robust utility maximization for diffusion market model with misspecified coefficients.Finance and Stochastics, 17(3):535–563, 2013

    work page 2013

  62. [62]

    Bart P. G. Van Parys, Daniel Kuhn, Paul J. Goulart, and Manfred Morari. Distributionally robust control of constrained stochastic systems.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 61(2):430–442, 2016

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    Wasserstein distributionally robust stochastic control: A data-driven approach

    Insoon Yang. Wasserstein distributionally robust stochastic control: A data-driven approach. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 66(8):3863–3870, 2021

    work page 2021