arxiv: 2605.05109 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Dimeric Perylene-Bisimide Organic Molecules: Fractional-Time Control of Quantum Resources

Abdessamie Chhieb , Chaimae Banouni , Sliha Abdessamie

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 16:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords fractional quantum dynamicsperylene-bisimide dimersquantum correlationstime-fractional Schrödinger equationentanglement dynamicsCaputo derivativemolecular quantum resourcesnonlocality

0 comments

The pith

A fractional order in the time-fractional Schrödinger equation controls memory effects and relaxation of quantum correlations in dimeric perylene-bisimide molecules.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models a pair of perylene-bisimide molecules linked by dipole-dipole interactions under a time-fractional Schrödinger equation that uses the Caputo derivative. It tracks how coherence, entanglement, and nonlocality change when the fractional order τ is varied, together with transition energies, interaction strength, and initial-state purity. The calculations employ relative entropy of coherence, concurrence, logarithmic entanglement entropy, and the CHSH inequality. A sympathetic reader would see this as a way to introduce tunable memory and non-Markovian behavior into molecular quantum resources simply by adjusting one fractional parameter instead of adding explicit environmental terms.

Core claim

Within the framework of the time-fractional Schrödinger equation with Caputo derivatives, the fractional order τ governs the time evolution of coherence, entanglement, and nonlocality for the Bell state in the dimeric PBI system. Different values of τ produce distinct memory effects and relaxation profiles that also depend on transition energies, interaction strength, and purity p; the study therefore presents fractional time as a control knob for these quantum correlations.

What carries the argument

The time-fractional Schrödinger equation with Caputo fractional derivatives, which replaces ordinary time differentiation to embed non-local memory into the quantum evolution of the molecular dimer.

If this is right

Varying τ slows or speeds the loss and revival of entanglement and coherence under dipole-dipole coupling.
Certain ranges of τ and interaction strength produce stronger or longer-lived CHSH violations.
Initial purity p interacts with τ to set how long coherence survives before relaxation.
The approach supplies explicit methods to tune and utilize molecular quantum correlations through the fractional parameter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same fractional-time framework could be applied to other organic dimers to engineer effective non-Markovian channels without explicit bath modeling.
Time-resolved spectroscopy on PBI aggregates might reveal signatures of fractional-order relaxation that standard Markovian models miss.
If confirmed, the method offers a parameter-light way to simulate memory effects in small molecular quantum registers.

Load-bearing premise

The real-time dynamics of the dimeric PBI system are accurately captured by the time-fractional Schrödinger equation with the Caputo derivative alone, without extra decoherence or environmental terms.

What would settle it

Time-resolved measurements of concurrence or CHSH violation on prepared PBI dimer states that deviate from the model's predicted dependence on τ for several tested values of the fractional order.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05109 by Abdessamie Chhieb, Chaimae Banouni, Sliha Abdessamie.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Schematic representation of the molecular dimer system. Two organic molecules are modeled as effective two-level quantum emitters with transition dipole moments P1 and P2. The molecules are separated by a distance characterized by the dipole–dipole coupling strength g12, which mediates coherent excitation exchange between them. The chemical structure of the covalently linked molecular dimer is shown on the… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Comparative plots showing the time evolution of Cr(ρ) (a–d), LN (b–e), and B(ρ) (c–f) as functions of time t, for two values of the fractional parameter: τ = 0.1 (fractional dynamics) and τ = 1 (standard Schrödinger evolution). The results are obtained by fixing ν1 = 1, ν2 = 2, and V12 = 1, for p = √1 2 (top panels) and p = √1 6 (bottom panels). τ=0.3 τ=0.5 τ=0.7 τ=0.9 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0.85 0.90 0.9… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Plots illustrating Cr(ρ) (a–d), LN (b–e), and B(ρ) (c–f) as functions of time t for various values of the fractional parameter τ , ν1 = 1, ν2 = 2, and V12 = 1, for p = √1 2 (top panels) and p = √1 6 (bottom panels) view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Plots illustrating Concurrence Cr(ρ) (a–d), LN (b–e), and B(ρ) (c–f) transition frequency of site 1 ν1, withe τ = 0.8, ν2 = 2, and V12 = 1, for p = √1 2 (top panels) and p = √1 6 (bottom panels) view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Plots illustrating Cr(ρ) (a–d), LN (b–e), and B(ρ) (c–f) as functions of time t for various values of the transition frequency of site 2 ν2. withe τ = 0.8, ν1 = 2, and V12 = 1, for p = √1 2 (top panels) and p = √1 6 (bottom panels) view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Plots illustrating Cr(ρ) (a–d), LN (b–e), and B(ρ) (c–f) as functions of time t for various values of the interaction strength V12. withe ν1 = 1, ν2 = 2, and τ = 0.8, for p = √1 2 (top panels) and p = √1 6 (bottom panels) view at source ↗

read the original abstract

In this work, we explore the dynamics of quantum correlations, namely coherence, entanglement, and nonlocality associated with a Bell state, in a dimeric arrangement of organic PBI molecules, mediated by dipole-dipole interactions, under time-fractional dynamics. Within the framework of the time-fractional Schr\"odinger equation (TFSE) with Caputo fractional derivatives, we explore system dynamics for different values of the fractional order $\tau$, transition energies, interaction strength, and purity $p$. We employ the relative entropy of coherence, logarithmic entanglement entropy and concurrence, and CHSH inequality to estimate system dynamics associated with coherence, entanglement, and nonlocality, respectively. These findings highlight the role of the fractional order $\tau$ in system dynamics, including memory effects and relaxation, and thereby bring together ideas from fractional calculus and quantum information theory perspectives and discuss methodologies to control and utilize these molecular quantum correlations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper runs parameter scans of the time-fractional Schrödinger equation on a PBI dimer and shows τ-dependent changes in coherence and entanglement, but supplies no derivation or environmental justification for the fractional model.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this work numerically evolves a dipole-dipole Hamiltonian for a PBI molecular dimer under the time-fractional Schrödinger equation with Caputo derivative and tracks the resulting time dependence of relative entropy of coherence, concurrence, and CHSH violation for different fractional orders τ, transition energies, interaction strengths, and initial purities. The plots indicate that smaller τ can slow relaxation or preserve correlations longer, which the authors link to memory effects. This specific combination of system and measures has not appeared in the prior literature on either fractional quantum mechanics or PBI photophysics, so the numerical exploration itself is new. The calculations appear straightforward and the parameter scans are presented clearly enough to be reproducible from the equations given. The central limitation is that the model choice is not motivated. Fractional time derivatives are conventionally introduced to encode non-Markovian memory arising from coupling to an environment, yet the Hamiltonian here is closed and contains no bath or decoherence terms. No microscopic derivation from a larger open-system master equation is provided, the τ = 1 limit is not compared against ordinary unitary evolution, and there is no contact with measured PBI spectra or relaxation times. As a result the reported control via τ remains a mathematical feature of the chosen equation rather than a demonstrated physical resource. This paper is aimed at researchers already working at the overlap of fractional calculus and molecular quantum information who are interested in exploratory numerics. A reader seeking experimentally anchored predictions or a first-principles justification will find the claims under-supported. I would send it to peer review so that referees can verify the integration details and ask for either a derivation of the fractional dynamics or explicit comparisons to the standard Schrödinger case.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper explores the dynamics of quantum coherence, entanglement, and nonlocality in a dimeric perylene-bisimide (PBI) organic molecule under dipole-dipole interactions using the time-fractional Schrödinger equation (TFSE) with Caputo fractional derivative. It varies the fractional order τ, transition energies, interaction strength, and purity p, employing measures like relative entropy of coherence, logarithmic entanglement entropy, concurrence, and CHSH inequality to show how τ influences memory effects and relaxation, proposing it as a control parameter for these quantum resources.

Significance. If the TFSE model is physically justified for the PBI dimer, the work would be significant in bridging fractional calculus with quantum information theory for molecular systems. It provides a tunable parameter τ to modulate non-Markovian memory and relaxation in quantum correlations, potentially inspiring control strategies for coherence, entanglement, and nonlocality in organic molecules.

major comments (2)

[Model and Methods] Model section: The TFSE with Caputo derivative is applied directly to the dipole-dipole Hamiltonian of the PBI dimer without a microscopic derivation from a larger open-system Hamiltonian or environmental bath. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as fractional derivatives are typically introduced to encode non-Markovian memory from an environment, yet no such justification, comparison to the τ=1 unitary limit, or validation against PBI spectroscopy is supplied.
[Results] Results section: The reported dependence of coherence, entanglement, and nonlocality on τ is presented as enabling control of quantum resources, but without benchmarks to standard dynamics or experimental data, the findings demonstrate mathematical features of the chosen equation rather than physically meaningful control in the molecular system.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that dynamics are explored for different values of τ but does not specify the numerical range or key quantitative outcomes, which would clarify the scope of the parameter scan.
[Introduction] Notation for the fractional order τ and the specific form of the Caputo derivative should be defined explicitly at first use, and additional references to prior applications of fractional quantum mechanics to molecular or open systems would provide better context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 2 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. The comments highlight important aspects of model justification and interpretation that we will address to strengthen the manuscript. Below we respond point by point to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Model and Methods] Model section: The TFSE with Caputo derivative is applied directly to the dipole-dipole Hamiltonian of the PBI dimer without a microscopic derivation from a larger open-system Hamiltonian or environmental bath. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as fractional derivatives are typically introduced to encode non-Markovian memory from an environment, yet no such justification, comparison to the τ=1 unitary limit, or validation against PBI spectroscopy is supplied.

Authors: We acknowledge that the TFSE is employed here as a phenomenological model to capture the influence of fractional time order on the quantum dynamics of the PBI dimer. This is in line with established uses of fractional calculus in quantum mechanics to encode memory effects without deriving from a specific bath Hamiltonian. The integer-order limit τ=1 recovers the standard Schrödinger equation, and we will add explicit comparisons of all measures (coherence, entanglement, nonlocality) between fractional and unitary cases in the revised Results section to serve as an internal benchmark. A full microscopic derivation from an open-system Hamiltonian would require specifying the environmental spectral density and coupling, which lies outside the scope of this work centered on the isolated dimer under dipole-dipole interaction. We will insert a clarifying paragraph in the Model section discussing the phenomenological motivation and its connection to non-Markovianity. Validation against PBI spectroscopy data is not possible within a purely theoretical study; we will note this limitation and suggest it as future experimental work. revision: partial
Referee: [Results] Results section: The reported dependence of coherence, entanglement, and nonlocality on τ is presented as enabling control of quantum resources, but without benchmarks to standard dynamics or experimental data, the findings demonstrate mathematical features of the chosen equation rather than physically meaningful control in the molecular system.

Authors: We agree that the control interpretation benefits from explicit benchmarks. In the revised manuscript we will include side-by-side plots and quantitative comparisons of the time evolution for representative values of τ against the standard unitary dynamics at τ=1, thereby demonstrating how fractional order modulates memory effects and relaxation rates in the chosen measures. This will clarify the physical content beyond pure mathematics. While direct experimental data on fractional-time dynamics in PBI systems is not yet available, the results indicate τ as a tunable parameter that could be realized through engineered environments or effective descriptions; we will temper the language in the abstract, results, and conclusions to emphasize the theoretical demonstration while outlining potential experimental implications. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved

Microscopic derivation of the TFSE from a larger open-system Hamiltonian specific to the PBI dimer
Experimental validation of the model against PBI spectroscopy data

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; fractional order τ is an independent input parameter

full rationale

The paper applies the time-fractional Schrödinger equation (Caputo) directly to the dipole-dipole Hamiltonian of the PBI dimer and varies the fractional order τ by hand to explore coherence, entanglement, and nonlocality. No quantity is defined in terms of a fitted parameter that is then presented as a prediction, and the derivation chain contains no self-definitional reductions, load-bearing self-citations, or imported uniqueness theorems. The central results follow from explicit numerical evaluation of the chosen fractional dynamics for different τ values, transition energies, interaction strengths, and purity p, making the model self-contained against its stated inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the Caputo time-fractional Schrödinger equation for this molecular system and on the standard definitions of the chosen quantum-information measures; no new entities are introduced and no parameters are fitted to data.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The time-fractional Schrödinger equation with Caputo derivative governs the unitary evolution of the two-molecule system under dipole-dipole coupling.
Invoked in the abstract as the framework for all dynamics; no derivation or justification from microscopic Hamiltonian is supplied.
standard math The relative entropy of coherence, logarithmic entanglement entropy, concurrence, and CHSH inequality remain valid quantifiers under fractional time evolution.
Standard definitions from quantum information theory are applied directly to the fractional dynamics without additional proof.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5467 in / 1338 out tokens · 28412 ms · 2026-05-08T16:15:05.380584+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

[1]

Quantum Coherent Energy Transfer over Varying Pathways in Sin- gle Light-Harvesting Complexes

Richard Hildner et al. “Quantum Coherent Energy Transfer over Varying Pathways in Sin- gle Light-Harvesting Complexes”. In:Science340.6139 (2013), pp. 1448–1451.doi:10.1126/ science.1235829

2013
[2]

Engineeringvibrationallyassistedenergytransferinmolec- ular dimers

AndrewGormanandTomášMančal.“Engineeringvibrationallyassistedenergytransferinmolec- ular dimers”. In:Journal of Chemical Physics143.12 (2015), p. 124106.doi:10.1063/1.4931619

work page doi:10.1063/1.4931619 2015
[3]

Coherent exciton dynamics in single molecules at room temperature

Florian Steiner et al. “Coherent exciton dynamics in single molecules at room temperature”. In: Nature Physics14 (2018), pp. 870–875.doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0188-6

work page doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0188-6 2018
[4]

Two-dimensional spectroscopy of electronic couplings in molecular aggre- gates

Tobias Brixner et al. “Two-dimensional spectroscopy of electronic couplings in molecular aggre- gates”. In:Journal of Chemical Physics121.9 (2004), pp. 4221–4236.doi:10.1063/1.1782306

work page doi:10.1063/1.1782306 2004
[5]

Single-molecule coherent control and single-qubit gate generation

Christian Pflumm and Vahid Sandoghdar. “Single-molecule coherent control and single-qubit gate generation”. In:Nature Physics11 (2015), pp. 54–58.doi:10.1038/nphys3179

work page doi:10.1038/nphys3179 2015
[6]

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

Michael A Nielsen and Isaac L Chuang.Quantum computation and quantum information. Cam- bridge university press, 2010.doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976667

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976667 2010
[8]

Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond.Quantum, 2:79, August 2018

John Preskill. “Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond”. In:Quantum2 (2018), p. 79. doi:https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79

work page Pith review doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 2018
[9]

Fractional Schrödinger equation

Nick Laskin. “Fractional Schrödinger equation”. In:Physical Review E66.5 (2002), p. 056108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.66.056108

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.66.056108 2002
[10]

Gonzalo Muga, Rafael Sala Mayato, and Íñigo L Egusquiza.Time in Quantum Mechanics-Vol
[11]

Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73473-4

Vol.734. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73473-4

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73473-4 2007
[12]

In: El Moataz, A., Mammass, D., Man- souri, A., Nouboud, F

Vasily E. Tarasov.Fractional Dynamics: Applications of Fractional Calculus to Dynamics of Particles, Fields, and Media. Vol.133. Springer, 2011.doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 642-14003-7

work page doi:10.1007/978-3- 2011
[13]

Hilfer, ed.Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics

R. Hilfer, ed.Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics. World Scientific, 2000.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1142/3779|March2000

work page doi:10.1142/3779 2000
[14]

Experimental realisations of the fractional Schrödinger equation in the tem- poral domain

Shilong Liu et al. “Experimental realisations of the fractional Schrödinger equation in the tem- poral domain”. In:Nature Communications14.1 (2023), p. 222.doi:https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41467-023-35892-8

2023
[15]

Spatio-temporal dynamics in the mixed fractional non- linear Schrödinger equation

Alejandro Aceves and Austin Copeland. “Spatio-temporal dynamics in the mixed fractional non- linear Schrödinger equation”. In:Frontiers in Photonics3(2), p. 977343.doi:10.3389/fphot. 2022.977343

work page doi:10.3389/fphot 2022
[16]

Laing and G

Heinz-Peter Breuer and Francesco Petruccione.The theory of open quantum systems. OUP Ox- ford, 2002.doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213900.001.0001

work page doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213900.001.0001 2002
[17]

Igor Podlubny.Fractional differential equations: an introduction to fractional derivatives, frac- tional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications. Vol. 198. elsevier, 1998.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.865 1998
[18]

Metrological non-classical correlations and quantum coherence in hybrid(1/2,1)system under decoherence channels

Abdessamie Chhieb et al. “Metrological non-classical correlations and quantum coherence in hybrid(1/2,1)system under decoherence channels”. In:Laser Physics34.10 (2024), p. 105202. doi:10.1088/1555-6611/ad71b0

work page doi:10.1088/1555-6611/ad71b0 2024
[19]

Fractional time dynamics of quantum correlations and coherence in an interacting qubit-qutrit system

Abdessamie Chhieb et al. “Fractional time dynamics of quantum correlations and coherence in an interacting qubit-qutrit system”. In:Physica Scripta(2025).doi:10.1088/1402-4896/addc50. 15

work page doi:10.1088/1402-4896/addc50 2025
[20]

Time fractional evolution of two superconducting charge qubits

Abdessamie Chhieb, Mansoura Oumennana, and Mostafa Mansour. “Time fractional evolution of two superconducting charge qubits”. In:Chaos, Solitons & Fractals201(2025), p. 117331. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117331

work page doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117331 2025
[21]

Non-Locality and Quantum Coherence in Superconducting Qubits

Chhieb Abdessamie et al. “Non-Locality and Quantum Coherence in Superconducting Qubits”. In:2025 International Conference on Circuit, Systems and Communication (ICCSC). IEEE. 2025, pp. 1–6.doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSC66714.2025.11135381

work page doi:10.1109/iccsc66714.2025.11135381 2025
[22]

Non-Locality and Quantum Coherence in Superconducting Qubits

Chaimae Banouni et al. “Thermal Entanglement and Coherence in a Two-Superconducting Charge Qubits”. In:2025 International Conference on Circuit, Systems and Communication (ICCSC). IEEE. 2025, pp. 1–5.doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSC66714.2025.11135220

work page doi:10.1109/iccsc66714.2025.11135220 2025
[23]

Computable measure of entanglement,

Guifré Vidal and Reinhard F Werner. “Computable measure of entanglement”. In:Physical Re- view A65.3 (2002), p. 032314.doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032314

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.65.032314 2002
[24]

Bl´ azquez-Salcedo, C

Martin B Plenio. “Logarithmic negativity: a full entanglement monotone that is not convex”. In: Physical Review Letters95.9 (2005), p. 090503.doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 95.090503

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2005
[25]

On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox,

John S Bell. “On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox”. In:Physics Physique Fizika1.3 (1964), pp. 195–200.doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195

work page doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 1964
[26]

Baumgratz, M

BaumgratzTCramerMPlenio.“Quantifyingcoherence”.In:Phys. Rev. Lett113(2014),p.140401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.140401

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.140401 2014
[27]

From fluorescence intermittency to coherent emission in single organic molecules

Max Otten and Taras Plakhotnik. “From fluorescence intermittency to coherent emission in single organic molecules”. In:Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics16 (2014), pp. 13058–13064.doi: 10.1039/C4CP01250H

work page doi:10.1039/c4cp01250h 2014
[28]

All-optical coherent population transfer in single molecules

Johannes Vogelsang and John M. Lupton. “All-optical coherent population transfer in single molecules”. In:Chemical Society Reviews47 (2018), pp. 691–713.doi:10.1039/C7CS00535B

work page doi:10.1039/c7cs00535b 2018
[29]

Quantumcoherenceinphotosyntheticcomplexes

GarrettA.D.Briggsetal.“Quantumcoherenceinphotosyntheticcomplexes”.In:Physical Review E83 (2011), p. 051911.doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.83.051911

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.83.051911 2011
[30]

Vibrations, quanta and biology

Susana F. Huelga and Martin B. Plenio. “Vibrations, quanta and biology”. In:Contemporary Physics54.4 (2013), pp. 181–207.doi:10.1080/00107514.2013.844668

work page doi:10.1080/00107514.2013.844668 2013
[31]

Optical detection of a single rare-earth ion in a crystal

Roman Kolesov et al. “Optical detection of a single rare-earth ion in a crystal”. In:Nature Communications3 (2012), p. 1029.doi:10.1038/ncomms2032

work page doi:10.1038/ncomms2032 2012
[32]

Radiation from an N-Atom System. I. General Formalism

Robert H. Lehmberg. “Radiation from an N-Atom System. I. General Formalism”. In:Physical Review A2.3 (1970), pp. 883–888.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.2.883

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.2.883 1970
[33]

Entangled states and collective nonclassical effects in two- atom systems

Zbigniew Ficek and Ryszard Tanaś. “Entangled states and collective nonclassical effects in two- atom systems”. In:Physics Reports372 (2005), pp. 369–443.doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2002. 10.004

work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2002 2005
[34]

Time fractional Schrödinger equation

M. Naber. “Time fractional Schrödinger equation”. In:Journal of Mathematical Physics45.8 (2004), pp. 3339–3352.doi:10.1063/1.1769481

work page doi:10.1063/1.1769481 2004
[35]

Time fractional evolution of two dipolar-coupled spins under DM and KSEA interactions

Abdessamie Chhieb et al. “Time fractional evolution of two dipolar-coupled spins under DM and KSEA interactions”. In:Optical and Quantum Electronics56.9 (2024), p. 1421.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11082-024-07320-8

work page doi:10.1007/s11082-024-07320-8 2024
[36]

Dynamics of quantum Fisher information and quantum coherence of two interacting atoms under time–fractional analysis

K El Anouz et al. “Dynamics of quantum Fisher information and quantum coherence of two interacting atoms under time–fractional analysis”. In:JOSA B39.4 (2022), pp. 979–989.doi: https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.444823

work page doi:10.1364/josab.444823 2022
[37]

Entanglement versus Bell non-locality via solving the fractional Schrödinger equation using the twisting model

A El Allati et al. “Entanglement versus Bell non-locality via solving the fractional Schrödinger equation using the twisting model”. In:Chaos, Solitons & Fractals179(2024), p. 114446.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114446. 16

work page doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114446 2024
[38]

Quantum Coherence in Light-Harvesting Complexes

F. Fassioli, A. Nazir, and G. D. Scholes. “Quantum Coherence in Light-Harvesting Complexes”. In:Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters5.19 (2014), pp. 3436–3442.doi:10.1021/jz5017816

work page doi:10.1021/jz5017816 2014
[39]

Measure for the Degree of Non-Markovian Behav- ior of Quantum Processes

H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, and J. Piilo. “Measure for the Degree of Non-Markovian Behav- ior of Quantum Processes”. In:Physical Review Letters103 (2009), p. 210401.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.103.210401. 17

2009