pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05663 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Scalar-Field Reconstruction of Ricci--Gauss--Bonnet Dark Energy in Hov{r}ava--Lifshitz Cosmology

Surajit Chattopadhyay
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 07:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords Ricci-Gauss-Bonnet dark energyHořava-Lifshitz cosmologyscalar field reconstructionequation of statesound speedgeneralized second lawlate-time acceleration
0
0 comments X

The pith

A scalar-field reconstruction of Ricci-Gauss-Bonnet dark energy in Hořava-Lifshitz cosmology produces analytic expressions that describe late-time acceleration while satisfying stability and thermodynamic conditions for suitable parameters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a scalar-field description of an effective dark energy sector that combines Ricci and Gauss-Bonnet curvature terms inside Hořava-Lifshitz gravity. It adopts a flat FRW metric with power-law scale factor to obtain closed expressions for the scalar kinetic term, potential, equation of state, and sound speed. These expressions show the equation of state approaching negative one at late times, positive sound-speed squared over identified parameter intervals, and non-negative total entropy change at the apparent horizon. A sympathetic reader would care because the construction supplies an explicit, thermodynamically consistent route to accelerated expansion within a modified-gravity framework that originates from quantum-gravity considerations.

Core claim

In a spatially flat FRW background with power-law scale factor, the Ricci-Gauss-Bonnet dark energy component of Hořava-Lifshitz cosmology admits a scalar-field reconstruction in which the effective equation-of-state parameter evolves toward a cosmological-constant value, the squared sound speed remains positive inside a stable region of parameter space, and the total entropy variation at the apparent horizon stays non-negative, thereby furnishing a viable model for late-time acceleration.

What carries the argument

The scalar-field reconstruction that equates the effective dark energy density and pressure arising from the Ricci-Gauss-Bonnet combination to the energy density and pressure of a canonical scalar field, performed under the power-law scale-factor ansatz in the Hořava-Lifshitz action.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption of a spatially flat FRW background together with a power-law scale factor, which is required to obtain closed-form expressions for the scalar-field quantities and the equation-of-state evolution.

What would settle it

A calculation that evaluates the squared sound speed for the specific parameter values producing late-time acceleration and finds it negative at some redshift, or a direct check that the total entropy at the apparent horizon decreases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05663 by Surajit Chattopadhyay.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Reconstructed scalar-field dynamics in the Ricci–Gauss–Bo view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Three-dimensional evolution of the squared speed of soun view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Three-dimensional evolution of the total entropy produc view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper reports a Ricci-Gauss-Bonnet (RGB) dark energy model within the framework of Ho\v{r}ava-Lifshitz cosmology and presents a scalar-field reconstruction of the effective dark energy sector. In a spatially flat FRW background with a power-law scale factor, we derive analytical expressions for cosmological parameters, scalar field kinetic term, and the reconstructed potential. The reconstructed EoS parameter exhibits smooth transition toward a cosmological-constant-like regime at late times for suitable choices of the model parameters. The classical stability of the model is analyzed through the squared sound speed, and stable regions of the parameter space are identified. Finally, the generalized second law of thermodynamics is investigated at the apparent horizon, and it is shown that the total entropy variation remains non-negative in this model. From these results it can be concluded that the model provides a theoretically consistent description of late-time acceleration, with physical viability maintained within a specific range of the model parameters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a scalar-field reconstruction of a Ricci-Gauss-Bonnet dark energy model embedded in Hořava-Lifshitz cosmology. Assuming a spatially flat FRW metric with power-law scale factor a(t)=t^n, it derives closed-form expressions for the scalar kinetic term, potential, and equation-of-state parameter w. The reconstructed w exhibits a smooth late-time approach to -1 for suitable parameter choices. Classical stability is assessed via the squared sound speed, stable parameter regions are identified, and the generalized second law is verified at the apparent horizon with non-negative total entropy production. The conclusion is that the model furnishes a theoretically consistent description of late-time acceleration within a restricted range of the model parameters.

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies an explicit analytic reconstruction of dark energy in Hořava-Lifshitz gravity that incorporates both Ricci and Gauss-Bonnet curvature terms, together with concrete checks of classical stability and thermodynamic consistency. The identification of viable parameter intervals via the sound-speed criterion is a concrete, falsifiable output that can guide further model-building.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 3 (reconstruction) and Sec. 4 (stability)] The power-law ansatz a(t)=t^n is imposed at the outset of the reconstruction (see the setup preceding Eq. (12) and the derivations in Sec. 3) rather than obtained as a dynamical solution of the modified Friedmann and scalar-field equations. Consequently, the reported w→−1 transition, the regions of positive c_s², and the non-negative entropy production are demonstrated only inside this fixed background; no attractor analysis or linear stability check around the power-law solution is supplied.
  2. [Conclusion and parameter-range statements in Sec. 4] The claim that the model remains physically viable “within a specific range of the model parameters” (abstract and conclusion) is therefore conditional on the ansatz. Without a demonstration that the same intervals remain stable when the scale factor is allowed to evolve freely, the load-bearing viability statement cannot be regarded as general.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that “analytical expressions are derived” but does not quote the explicit ranges of the power-law index n or the Gauss-Bonnet coupling strength that were actually scanned; adding these intervals would improve reproducibility.
  2. [Sec. 2 and Sec. 3] Notation for the Hořava-Lifshitz coupling constants (λ, μ, etc.) and the RGB coupling functions should be cross-checked for consistency between the Lagrangian in Sec. 2 and the reconstructed quantities in Sec. 3.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The points raised concern the scope of the power-law ansatz and the generality of the viability claims. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Sec. 3 (reconstruction) and Sec. 4 (stability)] The power-law ansatz a(t)=t^n is imposed at the outset of the reconstruction (see the setup preceding Eq. (12) and the derivations in Sec. 3) rather than obtained as a dynamical solution of the modified Friedmann and scalar-field equations. Consequently, the reported w→−1 transition, the regions of positive c_s², and the non-negative entropy production are demonstrated only inside this fixed background; no attractor analysis or linear stability check around the power-law solution is supplied.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the power-law form a(t)=t^n is introduced as an ansatz to enable closed-form reconstruction of the scalar-field quantities, which is a standard approach in the literature for obtaining analytic expressions in modified gravity cosmologies. All results in Sections 3 and 4, including the late-time w→−1 behavior, positive c_s² regions, and non-negative entropy production, are derived and verified explicitly for this background. We do not perform an attractor or linear stability analysis of the power-law solution within the full autonomous system. We will add a clarifying paragraph in the conclusion stating that the reported features hold under the adopted power-law ansatz and noting that a complete dynamical stability study would constitute a valuable follow-up investigation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Conclusion and parameter-range statements in Sec. 4] The claim that the model remains physically viable “within a specific range of the model parameters” (abstract and conclusion) is therefore conditional on the ansatz. Without a demonstration that the same intervals remain stable when the scale factor is allowed to evolve freely, the load-bearing viability statement cannot be regarded as general.

    Authors: We agree that the viability statements, including the identification of stable parameter intervals, are demonstrated specifically for the power-law background. To correct any potential overstatement of generality, we will revise the abstract and the final paragraph of the conclusion to explicitly qualify that the model furnishes a consistent description of late-time acceleration, with stable parameter ranges, under the assumed power-law expansion a(t)=t^n. This adjustment ensures the claims accurately reflect the scope of the analysis. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper explicitly states its use of a spatially flat FRW background with power-law scale factor a(t) = t^n to obtain closed-form expressions for the scalar kinetic term, potential, and EoS parameter. This is an upfront modeling choice that restricts the analysis to analytic tractability rather than a hidden reduction of the target results to the inputs by construction. The late-time w → −1 behavior is reported only for suitable parameter choices within the assumed background, which constitutes standard parameter-space exploration rather than a fitted-input-called-prediction or self-definitional loop. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work, or ansatzes smuggled via citation appear in the abstract or described derivation chain. The viability claims are therefore conditional on the stated assumptions and remain self-contained without circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard cosmological assumptions of a flat FRW metric and a power-law scale factor, plus the existence of a scalar field whose potential is reconstructed to match the RGB dark-energy density; no independent evidence for the specific functional form of the potential is supplied beyond the reconstruction itself.

free parameters (1)
  • model parameters controlling Gauss-Bonnet coupling and power-law index
    Chosen so that the equation-of-state parameter exhibits a smooth transition to minus one at late times.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spatially flat FRW background with power-law scale factor
    Invoked to obtain closed analytical expressions for the scalar-field kinetic term and potential.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5468 in / 1376 out tokens · 59442 ms · 2026-05-08T07:35:27.743791+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cosmological parameters fr om supernovae: Two groups’ results agree,

    S. Perlmutter and A. Riess, “Cosmological parameters fr om supernovae: Two groups’ results agree,” AIP Conf. Proc. 478, no.1, 129–142 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.59382

    work page doi:10.1063/1.59382 1999

  2. [2]

    Snapshot distances to Type Ia supernovae: All in ‘One’ night’s work,

    A. G. Riess, P. Nugent, A. V. Filippenko, R. P. Kirshner an d S. Perlmutter, “Snapshot distances to Type Ia supernovae: All in ‘One’ night’s work,” Astrophys. J. 504, 935 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1086/306106

    work page doi:10.1086/306106 1998

  3. [3]

    A definitive measurement of time dilation in the spectral evolution of the moderate-red shift Type Ia supernova 1997ex,

    R. J. Foley, A. V. Filippenko, D. C. Leonard, A. G. Riess, P . Nugent and S. Perlmutter, “A definitive measurement of time dilation in the spectral evolution of the moderate-red shift Type Ia supernova 1997ex,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 626, L11 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1086/431241

    work page doi:10.1086/431241 2005

  4. [4]

    Evidence for Type Ia supernova diversity from ultraviole t observations with the Hubble Space Telescope,

    X. Wang et al. , “Evidence for Type Ia supernova diversity from ultraviole t observations with the Hubble Space Telescope,” Astrophys. J. 749, 126 (2012). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/749/2/126/meta

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/749/2/126/meta 2012

  5. [5]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw641 , adsurl =

    Dark Energy Survey Collaboration, Abbott, T., Abdalla, F. B., Aleksi´ c, J., Allam, S., Amara, A., Bacon, D., Balbino t, E., Banerji, M., Bechtol, K., Benoit-L´ evy, A. et al., “The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy—an overview,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 460(2), 1270–1299 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw641

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw641 2016

  6. [6]

    J., Sami, M., & Tsujikawa, S

    E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa, “Dynamics of dar k energy,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15(11), 1753–1935 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1142/S021827180600942X

    work page doi:10.1142/s021827180600942x 1935

  7. [7]

    Dark energy an d the accelerating universe,

    J. A. Frieman, M. S. Turner and D. Huterer, “Dark energy an d the accelerating universe,” Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 46(1), 385–432 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145243

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145243 2008

  8. [8]

    J., & Ratra, B

    P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, “The cosmological constant and dark energy,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 75(2), 559–606 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.559

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.559 2003

  9. [9]

    2013, Frontiers of Physics, 8, 828, doi: 10.1007/s11467-013-0300-5

    M. Li, X.-D. Li, S. Wang and Y. Wang, “Dark energy: A brief r eview,” Front. Phys. 8(6), 828–846 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-013-0300-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s11467-013-0300-5 2013

  10. [10]

    Theoretical models of dark ener gy,

    J. Yoo and Y. Watanabe, “Theoretical models of dark ener gy,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 21(12), 1230002 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271812300029

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271812300029 2012

  11. [11]

    Reconstructing dark en ergy,

    V. Sahni and A. A. Starobinsky, “Reconstructing dark en ergy,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15(12), 2105–2132 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271806009704 17

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271806009704 2006

  12. [12]

    Brief review of recent advances in understandi ng dark matter and dark energy,

    E. Oks, “Brief review of recent advances in understandi ng dark matter and dark energy,” New Astron. Rev. 93, 101632 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newar.2021.101632

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newar.2021.101632 2021

  13. [13]

    Dark energy cons traints using gamma-ray burst correla- tions with DESI 2024 data,

    A. C. Alfano, O. Luongo and M. Muccino, “Dark energy cons traints using gamma-ray burst correla- tions with DESI 2024 data,” J. High Energy Astrophys. 46, 100348 (2025) (arXiv:2411.04878 [astro-ph.CO]) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100348

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100348 2024

  14. [14]

    Dark energy and dark matter from an additional adiabatic fluid,

    P. K. S. Dunsby, O. Luongo and L. Reverberi, “Dark energy and dark matter from an additional adiabatic fluid,” Phys. Rev. D 94, 083525 (2016) (arXiv:1604.06908 [gr-qc]) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.083525

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.083525 2016

  15. [15]

    Kinematic and sta tistical inconsistencies of Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz cosmology,

    O. Luongo, M. Muccino and H. Quevedo, “Kinematic and sta tistical inconsistencies of Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz cosmology, ” https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1811.05227

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.05227

  16. [16]

    P. K. Dunsby, O. Luongo and M. Muccino (2024). Unifying t he dark sector through a single matter fluid with nonzero pressure. Physical Review D , 109(2), 023510. (arXiv:2308.15776 [gr-qc]) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.023510

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.023510 2024

  17. [17]

    Cosmological tests of modified gravity,

    K. Koyama, “Cosmological tests of modified gravity,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 79(4), 046902 (2016). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0034-4885/79/4/046902/meta

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/4/046902/meta 2016

  18. [18]

    Dark energy vers us modified gravity,

    A. Joyce, L. Lombriser and F. Schmidt, “Dark energy vers us modified gravity,” Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 66(1), 95–122 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102115-044553

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102115-044553 2016

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla and C. Skordis, “M odified gravity and cosmology,” Phys. Rep. 513(1–3), 1–189 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.001 2012

  20. [21]

    Petrov, J

    A. Petrov, J. R. Nascimento and P. Porf ´ ırio, Introduction to Modified Gravity , Springer Nature, Cham (2023)

    2023

  21. [22]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou, “Modified g ravity theories on a nutshell: Inflation, bounce and late-ti me evolution,” Phys. Rep. 692, 1–104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.06.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.06.001 2017

  22. [23]

    Inflationary cosmology in m odified gravity theories,

    K. Bamba and S. D. Odintsov, “Inflationary cosmology in m odified gravity theories,” Symmetry 7(1), 220–240 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym7010220

    work page doi:10.3390/sym7010220 2015

  23. [24]

    S. Rani, N. Azhar, A. Majeed, and A. Jawad, Probing Aethe r scalar tensor theory through bouncing cosmologies, Interna- tional Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 23 (2026), 2550171. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887825501713

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219887825501713 2026

  24. [25]

    A. D. Alruwaili, A. Jawad, and R. Arif, Testing cosmic st ability phenomenon of Tsallis entropy corrected universe, Physics of the Dark Universe 51 (2026), 102183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2025.102183

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.102183 2026

  25. [26]

    Azhar, S

    N. Azhar, S. Karim, A. Jawad, M. M. Alam, M. S. Farid, and S . Shaymat, Observationally favorable consequences of cosmographic parameters and thermodynamics of dark energy model in non-zero torsion gravity, Physics of the Dark Universe 49 (2025), 102056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2025.102056

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.102056 2025

  26. [27]

    Azhar, A

    N. Azhar, A. Jawad, I. Ahmed, M. M. Alam, and S. Shaymatov , Cosmographic and thermodynamics analysis of five dimen- sional EChS gravity, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics 47 (2025), 100369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100369

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100369 2025

  27. [28]

    Usman, A

    M. Usman, A. Jawad, M. M. Alam, and S. Shaymatov, Effects o f nonlinear interactions on phase por- traits and dynamical stability in specific modified gravity, Physics of the Dark Universe 47 (2025), 101781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2024.101781

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101781 2025

  28. [29]

    Comparing the holographic principle inspired dark energy models,

    V. C. Dubey and U. K. Sharma, “Comparing the holographic principle inspired dark energy models,” New Astron. 86, 101586 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newast.2021.101586

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newast.2021.101586 2021

  29. [30]

    Theoretical aspects of holographic d ark energy,

    S. Wang and M. Li, “Theoretical aspects of holographic d ark energy,” Commun. Theor. Phys. 75(11), 117401 (2023). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1572-9494/acf27c/meta

    work page doi:10.1088/1572-9494/acf27c/meta 2023

  30. [31]

    Ho lographic dark-energy models,

    S. Del Campo, J. C. Fabris, R. Herrera and W. Zimdahl, “Ho lographic dark-energy models,” Phys. Rev. D 83(12), 123006 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.123006

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.123006 2011

  31. [32]

    Constraints on dark ene rgy from holography,

    B. Wang, E. Abdalla and R. K. Su, “Constraints on dark ene rgy from holography,” Phys. Lett. B 611(1–2), 21–26 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2005.02.026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.02.026 2005

  32. [33]

    Features of holographic d ark energy under combined cosmological constraints,

    Y.-Z. Ma, Y. Gong and X. Chen, “Features of holographic d ark energy under combined cosmological constraints,” Eur. Phys. J. C 60(2), 303–315 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-0876-7

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-0876-7 2009

  33. [34]

    Holographic dark energy, matt er creation, and cosmic acceleration,

    C. P. Singh and A. Kumar, “Holographic dark energy, matt er creation, and cosmic acceleration,” Phys. Rev. D 102(12), 123537 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.123537

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.123537 2020

  34. [35]

    Gauss–Bonnet effect s in f (R, Σ , T ) gravity,

    T. F. Dabash, A. Eid and M. A. Bakry, “Gauss–Bonnet effect s in f (R, Σ , T ) gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C 85(11), 1293 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15030-y

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15030-y 2025

  35. [36]

    Nojiri and S

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “Covariant generalized ho lographic dark energy and accelerating universe,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77(8), 528 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5097-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5097-x 2017

  36. [37]

    Dark energy: Vacuum fluctuations, the effective phantom phase, an d holography,

    E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and P. Wang, “Dark energy: Vacuum fluctuations, the effective phantom phase, an d holography,” Phys. Rev. D 71(10), 103504 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.103504

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.103504 2005

  37. [38]

    Nojiri and S

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “Unifying phantom inflatio n with late-time acceleration: Scalar phantom–non- phantom transition model and generalized holographic dark energy,” Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 38(8), 1285–1304 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-006-0301-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714-006-0301-6 2006

  38. [39]

    Early and late uni verse holographic cosmology from a new generalized entropy ,

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and T. Paul, “Early and late uni verse holographic cosmology from a new generalized entropy ,” Phys. Lett. B 831, 137189 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137189

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137189 2022

  39. [40]

    Bueno, P

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, J. Moreno and ´A. Murcia, “All higher-curvature gravities as generalized quasi-topological gravities,” J. High Energy Phys. 2019(11), 040 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2019)062

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2019)062 2019

  40. [41]

    Aspects of higher-curvature graviti es with covariant derivatives,

    S. E. Aguilar-Guti´ errez, P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hen nigar and Q. Llorens, “Aspects of higher-curvature graviti es with covariant derivatives,” Phys. Rev. D 108(12), 124075 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.124075 18

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.124075 2023

  41. [44]

    Renormaliz ability of alternative theories of gravity: Differences bet ween power counting and entropy argument,

    F. Bajardi, F. Bascone and S. Capozziello, “Renormaliz ability of alternative theories of gravity: Differences bet ween power counting and entropy argument,” Universe 7(5), 148 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/universe7050148

    work page doi:10.3390/universe7050148 2021

  42. [45]

    Cosmology of the Lifshitz universe,

    G. Calcagni, “Cosmology of the Lifshitz universe,” J. High Energy Phys. 2009(09), 112 (2009). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/112/meta

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/112/meta 2009

  43. [46]

    Quantization of (1 + 1)-dimensional Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz theory of gravity,

    B.-F. Li, A. Wang, Y. Wu and Z.-C. Wu, “Quantization of (1 + 1)-dimensional Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz theory of gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 90(12), 124076 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.124076

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.124076 2014

  44. [47]

    Resolution of cosmological singularity i n Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz cosmology,

    E. Czuchry, “Resolution of cosmological singularity i n Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz cosmology,” Universe 9(4), 160 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9040160

    work page doi:10.3390/universe9040160 2023

  45. [48]

    Cosmic and growth matter analysis of deformed Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz gravity,

    A. Jawad, M. Shad and K. Bamba, “Cosmic and growth matter analysis of deformed Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz gravity,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 31(08), 2250063 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271822500638

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271822500638 2022

  46. [49]

    Viability of baryon t o entropy ratio in modified Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz gravity,

    A. Jawad, A. M. Sultan and S. Rani, “Viability of baryon t o entropy ratio in modified Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz gravity,”Symmetry 15(4), 824 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15040824

    work page doi:10.3390/sym15040824 2023

  47. [50]

    Barrow hologr aphic dark energy in deformed Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz gravity,

    A. Jawad, S. Rani, S. Ashraf and N. Azhar, “Barrow hologr aphic dark energy in deformed Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz gravity,” Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 19(08), 2250112 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887822501122

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219887822501122 2022

  48. [51]

    Obser- vational constraints on the parameters of Hoˇ rava–Lifshit z gravity,

    H. Chaudhary, U. Debnath, S. K. J. Pacif, N. U. Molla, G. M ustafa and S. K. Maurya, “Obser- vational constraints on the parameters of Hoˇ rava–Lifshit z gravity,” Ann. Phys. 536(10), 2400181 (2024). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/andp.202400181

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.202400181 2024

  49. [52]

    Ricci–Gauss–Bonnet holographic dar k energy,

    E. N. Saridakis, “Ricci–Gauss–Bonnet holographic dar k energy,” Phys. Rev. D 97(6), 064035 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.064035

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.064035 2018

  50. [53]

    Holographic Ricci–Gauss–B onnet dark energy with observational constraints,

    V. C. Dubey and A. Pradhan, “Holographic Ricci–Gauss–B onnet dark energy with observational constraints,” Gravitation and Cosmology 31(4), 532–543 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289325700410

    work page doi:10.1134/s0202289325700410 2025

  51. [54]

    Thermodynamics of Ricci–Gauss– Bonnet dark energy,

    A. Iqbal and A. Jawad, “Thermodynamics of Ricci–Gauss– Bonnet dark energy,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2018, 6139430 (2018). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1155/2018/6139430

    work page doi:10.1155/2018/6139430 2018

  52. [55]

    Ricci–Gauss–Bonnet holographic dark energ y in Chern–Simons modified gravity: A flat FLR W quintessence- dominated universe,

    N. Ahmed, “Ricci–Gauss–Bonnet holographic dark energ y in Chern–Simons modified gravity: A flat FLR W quintessence- dominated universe,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35(05), 2050007 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732320500078

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732320500078 2020

  53. [56]

    Se cond-order approximation of Nojiri–Odintsov infrared cut off through heuristic expansion: A refined framework for hologr aphic dark energy dynamics with Ricci–Gauss–Bonnet form,

    A. Altaibayeva, A. Assetkhan and S. Chattopadhyay, “Se cond-order approximation of Nojiri–Odintsov infrared cut off through heuristic expansion: A refined framework for hologr aphic dark energy dynamics with Ricci–Gauss–Bonnet form,” Annals of Physics 470, 170220 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2025.170220

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2025.170220 2025

  54. [57]

    Ricci-cubic holographic dark energy,

    P. Rudra, “Ricci-cubic holographic dark energy,” Phys. Dark Univ. 42, 101307 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2023.101307

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2023.101307 2023

  55. [58]

    A cyclic Ricci–Gauss –Bonnet universe,

    A. Pradhan, N. Ahmed and A. Dixit, “A cyclic Ricci–Gauss –Bonnet universe,” Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 22(06), 2550017 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887825500173

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219887825500173 2025

  56. [59]

    Modified gravity in Arnowitt–Deser–Misner for malism,

    C. Gao, “Modified gravity in Arnowitt–Deser–Misner for malism,” Phys. Lett. B 684(2–3), 85–91 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2009.12.063

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.12.063 2010

  57. [60]

    Arnowitt–Des er–Misner representation and Hamiltonian analysis of cova riant renormalizable gravity,

    M. Chaichian, M. Oksanen and A. Tureanu, “Arnowitt–Des er–Misner representation and Hamiltonian analysis of cova riant renormalizable gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C 71(6), 1657 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1657-7

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1657-7 2011

  58. [61]

    Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point

    P. Hoˇ rava, “Quantum gravity at a Lifshitz point,” Phys. Rev. D 79(8), 084008 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.084008

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.084008 2009

  59. [62]

    Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz gravity: A status re port,

    T. P. Sotiriou, “Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz gravity: A status re port,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 283(1), 012034 (2011). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/283/1/012034/meta

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/283/1/012034/meta 2011

  60. [63]

    Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz Cosmolog y,

    E. Kiritsis and G. Kofinas, “Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz Cosmolog y,” Nucl. Phys. B 821, 467–480 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2009.05.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2009.05.005 2009

  61. [64]

    Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz Cosmology: A Review,

    S. Mukohyama, “Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz Cosmology: A Review, ” Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 223101 (2010). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0264-9381/27/22/223101/meta

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/22/223101/meta 2010

  62. [65]

    Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz dark energy,

    E. N. Saridakis, “Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz dark energy,” Eur. Phys. J. C 67, 229–235 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1294-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1294-6 2010

  63. [66]

    Gauss–Bonnet dark energy on Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz cosmology,

    S. Lepe and G. Otalora, “Gauss–Bonnet dark energy on Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz cosmology,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 331 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5822-0

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5822-0 2018

  64. [67]

    Cosmological asp ects of sound speed parameterizations in fractal universe,

    A. Jawad, S. Butt, S. Rani and K. Asif, “Cosmological asp ects of sound speed parameterizations in fractal universe, ” Eur. Phys. J. C 79(11), 926 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7445-5

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7445-5 2019

  65. [68]

    Cosmic analysis for som e parametrized squared speed of sound models in nonzero tors ion cosmology,

    S. Rani, I. Ashraf and A. Jawad, “Cosmic analysis for som e parametrized squared speed of sound models in nonzero tors ion cosmology,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 31(13), 2250094 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271822500948

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271822500948 2022

  66. [69]

    Sound speed of scala r field dark energy: weak effects and large uncertainties,

    O. Sergijenko and B. Novosyadlyj, “Sound speed of scala r field dark energy: weak effects and large uncertainties,” Phys. Rev. D 91(8), 083007 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.083007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.083007 2015

  67. [70]

    Novosyadlyj, V

    B. Novosyadlyj, V. Pelykh, Yu. Shtanov and A. Zhuk, Dark Energy and Dark Matter in the Universe: in Three Volumes , Vol. 1: Dark Energy: Observational Evidence and Theoretica l Models, edited by V. Shulga, Akademperiodyka, Kyiv (2013), 380 pp., ISBN 978-966-360-239-4

    2013

  68. [71]

    Amendola and S

    L. Amendola and S. Tsujikawa, Dark Energy: Theory and Observations , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    2010

  69. [72]

    Final state and thermod ynamics of a dark energy universe,

    S. I. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “Final state and thermod ynamics of a dark energy universe,” Phys. Rev. D 70(10), 103522 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.103522 19

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.103522 2004

  70. [73]

    Correspondence of cosmology from non- extensive thermodynamics with fluids of generalized equati on of state,

    S. I. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, E. N. Saridakis and R. Myrza kulov, “Correspondence of cosmology from non- extensive thermodynamics with fluids of generalized equati on of state,” Nucl. Phys. B 950, 114850 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.114850

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.114850 2020

  71. [74]

    Second law of ho rizon thermodynamics during cosmic evolution,

    S. D. Odintsov, T. Paul and S. SenGupta, “Second law of ho rizon thermodynamics during cosmic evolution,” Phys. Rev. D 109(10), 103515 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.103515

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.103515 2024

  72. [75]

    Natural valida tion of the second law of thermodynamics in cosmology,

    S. D. Odintsov, T. Paul and S. SenGupta, “Natural valida tion of the second law of thermodynamics in cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D 111(4), 043544 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.043544

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.043544 2025

  73. [76]

    Therm odynamical aspects of relativistic hydrodynamics in f (R, G ) gravity,

    S. H. Shekh, S. Arora, V. R. Chirde and P. K. Sahoo, “Therm odynamical aspects of relativistic hydrodynamics in f (R, G ) gravity,” Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 17(03), 2050048 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887820500486

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219887820500486 2020

  74. [77]

    A holographic model of dark e nergy and the thermodynamics of a non-flat accelerated expanding universe,

    M. R. Setare and S. Shafei, “A holographic model of dark e nergy and the thermodynamics of a non-flat accelerated expanding universe,” J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2006(09), 011 (2006). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1475-7516/2006/09/011/meta

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2006/09/011/meta 2006

  75. [78]

    Thermodynamics i n modified gravity theories,

    K. Bamba, C. Q. Geng and S. Tsujikawa, “Thermodynamics i n modified gravity theories,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 20(08), 1363–1371 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271811019542

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271811019542 2011

  76. [79]

    Thermodynamics in f (R, T ) theory of gravity,

    M. Sharif and M. Zubair, “Thermodynamics in f (R, T ) theory of gravity,” J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2012(03), 028 (2012). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1475-7516/2012/03/028/meta

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/03/028/meta 2012

  77. [80]

    Thermodynamics in modified gra vity with curvature–matter coupling,

    M. Sharif and M. Zubair, “Thermodynamics in modified gra vity with curvature–matter coupling,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2013, 947898 (2013). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1155/2013/947898

    work page doi:10.1155/2013/947898 2013

  78. [81]

    Apparent horizon and gravitati onal thermodynamics of the universe: solutions to the temperature and entropy confusions and extensions to mo dified gravity,

    D. W. Tian and I. Booth, “Apparent horizon and gravitati onal thermodynamics of the universe: solutions to the temperature and entropy confusions and extensions to mo dified gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 92(2), 024001 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.024001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.024001 2015

  79. [82]

    Thermodynamic properties of modified gravit y theories,

    K. Bamba, “Thermodynamic properties of modified gravit y theories,” Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 13(06), 1630007 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887816300075

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219887816300075 2016

  80. [83]

    Some aspe cts of generalized modified gravity models,

    R. Myrzakulov, L. Sebastiani and S. Zerbini, “Some aspe cts of generalized modified gravity models,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 22(08), 1330017 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271813300176

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271813300176 2013

Showing first 80 references.