arxiv: 2605.05799 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

T^a_{cbar{s}0}(2900), T_{cs0}^*(2870)⁰, and other singly-heavy tetraquark states

Yan-Rui Liu, Yu-Nan Liu, Zi-Long Man

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 08:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords tetraquarkssingly-heavymass spectrumLHCbX(4140)rearrangement decaysexotic hadronsheavy quark

0 comments

The pith

The LHCb states T^a_{c s0}(2900) and T_cs0^*(2870) are the second highest I(J^P)=1(0^+) cn s nbar and higher I(J^P)=0(0^+) cs n nbar tetraquarks in a mass splitting model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates the mass spectra of S-wave singly-heavy tetraquarks with one heavy quark and three light quarks using a model that determines all mass splittings from a single reference state. It assigns the two recently observed LHCb resonances to particular positions in this spectrum and estimates their decay widths through a rearrangement process. A reader would care because the assignments offer a unified description of these exotic particles and point to additional narrow states worth searching for in both charm and bottom sectors.

Core claim

We systematically study the mass spectra of S-wave singly-heavy tetraquark states Qq qbar qbar (Q=c,b; q=u,d,s) in a mass splitting model. We adopt the assumption that the X(4140) is the lowest J^{PC}=1^{++} cs cbar sbar tetraquark and use this state as a reference to determine the mass splittings. According to the obtained results, we find that the recently observed states T^a_{c s0}(2900)^{++/0} and T_cs0^*(2870)^0 by the LHCb Collaboration can be consistently interpreted as the second highest I(J^P)=1(0^+) cn sbar nbar (n=u,d) and the higher I(J^P)=0(0^+) cs nbar nbar tetraquark states, respectively.

What carries the argument

A mass splitting model anchored by the assumed lowest 1++ cs cbar sbar tetraquark X(4140) that fixes relative masses for all other singly-heavy tetraquarks.

If this is right

The lowest I(J^P)=0(0^+) and 0(1^+) cn sbar nbar and cs nbar nbar states are predicted to be narrow.
The corresponding bottom-sector states are also expected to be narrow tetraquark candidates.
Rearrangement decay widths are estimated for the assigned and predicted states in a simple scheme.
The mass and decay information guides experimental searches for additional singly-heavy tetraquarks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the assignments hold, the same mass-splitting pattern should appear among bottom tetraquarks and can be tested at higher-energy colliders.
The model implies that compact tetraquark structures are favored over loosely bound molecular pictures for these particular states.
Extending the calculation to include orbital excitations would produce a more complete spectrum testable by future data.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the X(4140) is the lowest J^{PC}=1^{++} cs cbar sbar tetraquark used to fix the reference mass splittings.

What would settle it

A measurement of the quantum numbers or precise mass of T^a_{c s0}(2900) that places it outside the predicted position for the second I=1 0+ cn sbar nbar state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05799 by Yan-Rui Liu, Yu-Nan Liu, Zi-Long Man.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1: Relative positions for the singly-heavy tetraquark states. The red solid and green dashed lines in the panels view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We systematically study the mass spectra of $S$-wave singly-heavy tetraquark states $Qq\bar{q}\bar{q}$ ($Q=c,b$; $q=u,d,s$) in a mass splitting model. We adopt the assumption that the $X(4140)$ is the lowest $J^{PC}=1^{++}$ $cs\bar{c}\bar{s}$ tetraquark and use this state as a reference to determine the mass splittings. According to the obtained results, we also estimate the rearrangement decay widths of the tetraquarks within a simple scheme. We find that the recently observed states $T^a_{c\bar{s}0}(2900)^{++/0}$ and $T_{cs0}^*(2870)^0$ by the LHCb Collaboration can be consistently interpreted as the second highest $I(J^P)=1(0^+)$ $cn\bar{s}\bar{n}$ ($n=u,d$) and the higher $I(J^P)=0(0^+)$ $cs\bar{n}\bar{n}$ tetraquark states, respectively. We predict several narrow tetraquark candidates: the lowest $cn\bar{s}\bar{n}$ and $cs\bar{n}\bar{n}$ with $I(J^P)=0(0^+)$ and $0(1^+)$, and their bottom counterparts. The obtained information from mass spectrum and rearrangement decay properties will help search for the new singly-heavy tetraquark states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper assigns two LHCb states to specific singly-heavy tetraquark configurations via mass splittings fixed by X(4140), but the scheme is only as good as that single reference choice.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that the authors interpret T^a_{c s0}(2900) as the second-highest I=1 0+ cn s bar n bar state and T_cs0^*(2870) as the higher I=0 0+ cs n bar n bar state, using a mass-splitting model anchored to X(4140) as the lowest 1++ cs c bar s bar tetraquark. They also predict several narrow candidates in both charm and bottom sectors and give rough rearrangement decay widths. This is a straightforward extension of an existing phenomenological approach to the full set of S-wave Qq q bar q bar states. It produces a consistent organizing scheme and concrete search targets, which is useful within the subfield of heavy exotic hadrons. The systematic treatment across flavors and the bottom-sector predictions stand out as the parts that could guide future work. The central limitation is the reference-state choice. All mass differences are determined relative to X(4140), so the numerical agreement with the LHCb masses is not an independent test but follows directly from the input. The paper does not test alternative anchors or show sensitivity to that assumption. The decay-width estimates remain at the level of a simple scheme without detailed comparisons or uncertainties. This work is for readers already following tetraquark phenomenology and LHCb exotics results. A specialist looking for model predictions or candidate lists will get value from the assignments and the narrow-state forecasts. It is not aimed at those seeking lattice QCD or model-independent statements. I would send it to peer review. The claims are clear, the predictions are falsifiable, and the approach is standard enough that referees can judge the robustness of the X(4140) assumption and the decay estimates without needing major new machinery.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript systematically studies the mass spectra of S-wave singly-heavy tetraquark states Qq qbar qbar (Q=c,b; q=u,d,s) in a mass splitting model. It adopts the assumption that X(4140) is the lowest J^{PC}=1^{++} cs cbar s bar tetraquark to fix the mass splittings, interprets the LHCb states T^a_{c bar s0}(2900)^{++/0} as the second highest I(J^P)=1(0^+) cn bar s bar n tetraquark and T_{cs0}^*(2870)^0 as the higher I(J^P)=0(0^+) cs bar n bar n state, estimates rearrangement decay widths in a simple scheme, and predicts several narrow tetraquark candidates including bottom counterparts.

Significance. If the X(4140) assumption holds, the work supplies a consistent phenomenological assignment for the recent LHCb tetraquark candidates together with concrete predictions for additional narrow states and their decay properties, which could guide experimental searches. The systematic coverage of mass spectra across flavor combinations and the inclusion of width estimates are strengths that add value to the tetraquark phenomenology literature.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and §2] Abstract and model description: The mass predictions for the cn bar s bar n and cs bar n bar n configurations (including the specific assignments to the 2900 MeV and 2870 MeV resonances) are obtained by adding flavor-dependent splittings whose zero point and offsets are fixed exclusively by treating the X(4140) mass as the ground-state cs cbar s bar 1^{++} tetraquark; no alternative calibration, sensitivity study, or independent cross-check is provided, so the numerical agreement is a direct consequence of this single input choice.
[Abstract] Abstract: The rearrangement decay widths are estimated only within a simple scheme with no quantitative error analysis, uncertainty propagation, or comparison to alternative decay models, which weakens the support for the claimed consistency of the state interpretations.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The notation T^a_{c bar s0}(2900)^{++/0} and similar state labels could be defined more explicitly on first use to aid readers outside the immediate LHCb tetraquark community.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major comments point by point below, providing the strongest honest defense of our approach while clarifying limitations and indicating revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and §2] Abstract and model description: The mass predictions for the cn bar s bar n and cs bar n bar n configurations (including the specific assignments to the 2900 MeV and 2870 MeV resonances) are obtained by adding flavor-dependent splittings whose zero point and offsets are fixed exclusively by treating the X(4140) mass as the ground-state cs cbar s bar 1^{++} tetraquark; no alternative calibration, sensitivity study, or independent cross-check is provided, so the numerical agreement is a direct consequence of this single input choice.

Authors: We agree that the numerical results follow directly from anchoring the mass splittings to the X(4140) as the lowest 1^{++} cs cbar s bar state, as explicitly stated in the abstract and Section 2. This is the defining feature of the mass-splitting model, which is a phenomenological framework designed to test consistency of assignments rather than to deliver parameter-independent predictions. The agreement with the LHCb states T^a_{c bar s0}(2900) and T_{cs0}^*(2870)^0 therefore illustrates that these resonances fit naturally within the same pattern once the reference mass is fixed. We have added a short paragraph in Section 2 that explicitly discusses the dependence on this assumption, notes that alternative interpretations of X(4140) would shift the entire spectrum, and states that the current calibration is chosen because it is the most commonly adopted one in the literature. A full sensitivity scan over multiple reference states would require recomputing all flavor combinations and is left for future work, but the transparency of the single-input procedure is now emphasized. revision: partial
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The rearrangement decay widths are estimated only within a simple scheme with no quantitative error analysis, uncertainty propagation, or comparison to alternative decay models, which weakens the support for the claimed consistency of the state interpretations.

Authors: The widths are obtained from a minimal quark-rearrangement model that yields only order-of-magnitude estimates of the dominant two-body channels; this is standard for exploratory tetraquark studies and is sufficient to identify which states are expected to be narrow. We accept that the absence of propagated uncertainties or comparisons with other approaches (e.g., QCD sum rules or effective Lagrangians) limits the quantitative strength of the decay discussion. In the revised version we have updated the abstract to describe the widths as “rough estimates” and inserted a brief paragraph in the decay section that lists the main sources of uncertainty (phase-space approximations, wave-function overlap assumptions) and notes that more refined calculations lie beyond the present scope. The qualitative conclusion that the predicted narrow states remain narrow under reasonable variations is retained, but the language is now more cautious. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model uses external reference state to set scale

full rationale

The paper explicitly adopts the assumption that the observed X(4140) is the lowest 1++ cs cbar sbar tetraquark and uses its mass to fix the zero point and flavor-dependent splittings in a phenomenological mass formula. It then computes masses for cn sbar nbar and cs nbar nbar configurations and compares them to the new LHCb resonances T^a_c sbar s0(2900) and T_cs0^*(2870). This is a standard calibration-plus-prediction procedure with an independent external input; the new states are not used to determine the splittings, and the paper makes no claim that the splittings are derived from first principles or that the assignment is forced by internal consistency alone. No self-referential definitions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions of the same quantities, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on one ad-hoc assumption about the identity of X(4140) together with the mass-splitting parameters derived from it; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)

mass splittings
The splittings are determined by adopting X(4140) as the reference state to set the overall scale for all other tetraquark masses.

axioms (1)

ad hoc to paper X(4140) is the lowest J^{PC}=1^{++} cs bar c bar s tetraquark
This assumption is explicitly adopted in the abstract to fix the mass splittings used throughout the spectrum calculation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5580 in / 1431 out tokens · 43035 ms · 2026-05-08T08:34:43.303666+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

First Observation of a Doubly Charged Tetraquark and Its Neutral Partner,

R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “First Observation of a Doubly Charged Tetraquark and Its Neutral Partner,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, no.4, 041902 (2023) [arXiv:2212.02716 [hep-ex]]

work page arXiv 2023
[2]

Amplitude analysis ofB 0 →D 0D+ s π− andB + →D −D+ s π+ decays,

R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Amplitude analysis ofB 0 →D 0D+ s π− andB + →D −D+ s π+ decays,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.1, 012017 (2023) [arXiv:2212.02717 [hep-ex]]

work page arXiv 2023
[3]

A model-independent study of resonant structure inB + →D +D−K+ decays,

R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “A model-independent study of resonant structure inB + →D +D−K+ decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 242001 (2020) [arXiv:2009.00025 [hep-ex]]

work page arXiv 2020
[4]

Amplitude analysis of theB + →D +D−K+ decay,

R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Amplitude analysis of theB + →D +D−K+ decay,” Phys. Rev. D102, 112003 (2020) [arXiv:2009.00026 [hep-ex]]

work page arXiv 2020
[5]

Exotic hadron naming convention,

T. Gershon [LHCb], “Exotic hadron naming convention,” [arXiv:2206.15233 [hep-ex]]

work page arXiv
[6]

Observation of New Charmonium or Charmoniumlike States inB + →D ∗±D∓K+ Decays,

R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Observation of New Charmonium or Charmoniumlike States inB + →D ∗±D∓K+ Decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, no.13, 131902 (2024) [arXiv:2406.03156 [hep-ex]]

work page arXiv 2024
[7]

Observation of the Open-Charm Tetraquark CandidateT ∗ cs0(2870)0 in theB − →D −D0K0 S Decay,

R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Observation of the Open-Charm Tetraquark CandidateT ∗ cs0(2870)0 in theB − →D −D0K0 S Decay,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134, no.10, 101901 (2025) [arXiv:2411.19781 [hep-ex]]

work page arXiv 2025
[8]

Evidence for aB 0 s π± state,

V. M. Abazovet al.[D0], “Evidence for aB 0 s π± state,” Phys. Rev. Lett.117, no.2, 022003 (2016) [arXiv:1602.07588 [hep-ex]]

work page arXiv 2016
[9]

Search for Structure in theB 0 s π± Invariant Mass Spectrum,

R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Search for Structure in theB 0 s π± Invariant Mass Spectrum,” Phys. Rev. Lett.117, no.15, 152003 (2016) [arXiv:1608.00435 [hep-ex]]

work page arXiv 2016
[10]

Search for the X(5568) state decaying into B 0 s π± in proton-proton collisions at √s= 8 TeV,

A. M. Sirunyanet al.[CMS], “Search for the X(5568) state decaying into B 0 s π± in proton-proton collisions at √s= 8 TeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120, no.20, 202005 (2018) [arXiv:1712.06144 [hep-ex]]

work page arXiv 2018
[11]

A search for the exotic mesonX(5568) with the Collider Detector at Fermilab,

T. Aaltonenet al.[CDF], “A search for the exotic mesonX(5568) with the Collider Detector at Fermilab,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120, no.20, 202006 (2018) [arXiv:1712.09620 [hep-ex]]

work page arXiv 2018
[12]

Search for a Structure in theB 0 s π± Invariant Mass Spectrum with the ATLAS Experiment,

M. Aaboudet al.[ATLAS], “Search for a Structure in theB 0 s π± Invariant Mass Spectrum with the ATLAS Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120, no.20, 202007 (2018) [arXiv:1802.01840 [hep-ex]]

work page arXiv 2018
[13]

X(5568) and and its partner states,

Y. R. Liu, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, “X(5568) and and its partner states,” Phys. Rev. D93, no.7, 074023 (2016) [arXiv:1603.01131 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[14]

Mass and decay constant of the newly observed exoticX(5568) state,

S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, “Mass and decay constant of the newly observed exoticX(5568) state,” Phys. Rev. D93, no.7, 074024 (2016) [arXiv:1602.08642 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[15]

CanX(5568) be a tetraquark state?,

W. Wang and R. Zhu, “CanX(5568) be a tetraquark state?,” Chin. Phys. C40, no.9, 093101 (2016) [arXiv:1602.08806 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[16]

Analysis of theX(5568) as scalar tetraquark state in the diquark-antidiquark model with QCD sum rules,

Z. G. Wang, “Analysis of theX(5568) as scalar tetraquark state in the diquark-antidiquark model with QCD sum rules,” Commun. Theor. Phys.66, no.3, 335-339 (2016) [arXiv:1602.08711 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[17]

QCD sum rule study of a charged bottom-strange scalar meson,

C. M. Zanetti, M. Nielsen and K. P. Khemchandani, “QCD sum rule study of a charged bottom-strange scalar meson,” Phys. Rev. D93, no.9, 096011 (2016) [arXiv:1602.09041 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[18]

Decoding theX(5568) as a fully open-flavorsu ¯b ¯dtetraquark state,

W. Chen, H. X. Chen, X. Liu, T. G. Steele and S. L. Zhu, “Decoding theX(5568) as a fully open-flavorsu ¯b ¯dtetraquark state,” Phys. Rev. Lett.117, no.2, 022002 (2016) [arXiv:1602.08916 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[19]

Width of the exoticX b(5568) state through its strong decay toB 0 s π+,

S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, “Width of the exoticX b(5568) state through its strong decay toB 0 s π+,” Phys. Rev. D93, no.11, 114007 (2016) [arXiv:1603.00290 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[20]

A QCD sum rule calculation of the X ±(5568)→B 0 s π± decay width,

J. M. Dias, K. P. Khemchandani, A. Mart´ ınez Torres, M. Nielsen and C. M. Zanetti, “A QCD sum rule calculation of the X ±(5568)→B 0 s π± decay width,” Phys. Lett. B758, 235-238 (2016) [arXiv:1603.02249 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[21]

Analysis of the strong decayX(5568)→B 0 s π+ with QCD sum rules,

Z. G. Wang, “Analysis of the strong decayX(5568)→B 0 s π+ with QCD sum rules,” Eur. Phys. J. C76, no.5, 279 (2016) [arXiv:1603.02498 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[22]

Tetraquark States with Open Flavors,

L. Tang and C. F. Qiao, “Tetraquark States with Open Flavors,” Eur. Phys. J. C76, no.10, 558 (2016) [arXiv:1603.04761 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[23]

Masses of open charm and bottom tetraquark states in a relativized quark model,

Q. F. L¨ u and Y. B. Dong, “Masses of open charm and bottom tetraquark states in a relativized quark model,” Phys. Rev. D94, no.9, 094041 (2016) [arXiv:1603.06417 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[24]

Open-flavor charm and bottomsq¯q ¯Qandqq¯q ¯Qtetraquark states,

W. Chen, H. X. Chen, X. Liu, T. G. Steele and S. L. Zhu, “Open-flavor charm and bottomsq¯q ¯Qandqq¯q ¯Qtetraquark states,” Phys. Rev. D95, no.11, 114005 (2017) [arXiv:1705.10088 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2017
[25]

0 + tetraquark states from improved QCD sum rules: delving intoX(5568),

J. R. Zhang, J. L. Zou and J. Y. Wu, “0 + tetraquark states from improved QCD sum rules: delving intoX(5568),” Chin. Phys. C42, no.4, 043101 (2018) [arXiv:1705.03741 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2018
[26]

Mass spectra and decays of open-heavy tetraquark states,

T. Guo, J. Li, J. Zhao and L. He, “Mass spectra and decays of open-heavy tetraquark states,” Phys. Rev. D105, no.5, 054018 (2022) [arXiv:2108.06222 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[27]

Open-charm tetraquark candidate: Note onX 0(2900),

J. R. Zhang, “Open-charm tetraquark candidate: Note onX 0(2900),” Phys. Rev. D103, no.5, 054019 (2021) [arXiv:2008.07295 [hep-ph]]. 20

work page arXiv 2021
[28]

Analysis of theX 0(2900) as the scalar tetraquark state via the QCD sum rules,

Z. G. Wang, “Analysis of theX 0(2900) as the scalar tetraquark state via the QCD sum rules,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35, no.30, 2050187 (2020) [arXiv:2008.07833 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2020
[29]

Magnetic moment of theX 1(2900) state in the diquark–antidiquark picture,

U. ¨Ozdem and K. Azizi, “Magnetic moment of theX 1(2900) state in the diquark–antidiquark picture,” Eur. Phys. J. A 58, no.9, 171 (2022) [arXiv:2202.11466 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[30]

Open charm and bottom tetraquarks in an extended relativized quark model,

Q. F. L¨ u, D. Y. Chen and Y. B. Dong, “Open charm and bottom tetraquarks in an extended relativized quark model,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.7, 074021 (2020) [arXiv:2008.07340 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2020
[31]

Mass spectrum and strong decays of tetraquark ¯c¯sqqstates,

G. J. Wang, L. Meng, L. Y. Xiao, M. Oka and S. L. Zhu, “Mass spectrum and strong decays of tetraquark ¯c¯sqqstates,” Eur. Phys. J. C81, no.2, 188 (2021) [arXiv:2010.09395 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2021
[32]

sQ¯ q¯ q(q=u,d;Q=c,b) tetraquarks in the chiral quark model,

G. Yang, J. Ping and J. Segovia, “sQ¯ q¯ q(q=u,d;Q=c,b) tetraquarks in the chiral quark model,” Phys. Rev. D103, no.7, 074011 (2021) [arXiv:2101.04933 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2021
[33]

X(2900) in a chiral quark model,

Y. Tan and J. Ping, “X(2900) in a chiral quark model,” Chin. Phys. C45, no.9, 093104 (2021) [arXiv:2010.04045 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2021
[34]

DK and BK-like spectra from Laplace sum rule at NLO,

S. Narison, A. Rabemananajara and D. Rabetiarivony, “DK and BK-like spectra from Laplace sum rule at NLO,” Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc.318-323, 90-95 (2022) [arXiv:2111.06481 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[35]

Tetraquarks with open charm flavor,

Y. Xue, X. Jin, H. Huang and J. Ping, “Tetraquarks with open charm flavor,” Phys. Rev. D103, no.5, 054010 (2021) [arXiv:2008.09516 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2021
[36]

Discovery ofT a c¯s(2900)0,++ implies new charmed-strange pentaquark system,

H. T. An, Z. W. Liu, F. S. Yu and X. Liu, “Discovery ofT a c¯s(2900)0,++ implies new charmed-strange pentaquark system,” Phys. Rev. D106, no.11, L111501 (2022) [arXiv:2207.02813 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[37]

Modeling the resonanceT a cs(2900)++ as a hadronic molecule D*+K*+,

S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, “Modeling the resonanceT a cs(2900)++ as a hadronic molecule D*+K*+,” Phys. Rev. D107, no.9, 094019 (2023) [arXiv:2212.12001 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2023
[38]

Analysis of theT c¯s(2900)and related tetraquark states with the QCD sum rules,

X. S. Yang, Q. Xin and Z. G. Wang, “Analysis of theT c¯s(2900)and related tetraquark states with the QCD sum rules,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A38, no.11, 2350056 (2023) [arXiv:2302.01718 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2023
[39]

Novel Tcs and Tcs¯candidates in a constituent-quark-model- based meson-meson coupled-channels calculation,

P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, F. Fernandez and J. Segovia, “Novel Tcs and Tcs¯candidates in a constituent-quark-model- based meson-meson coupled-channels calculation,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.9, 094035 (2023) [arXiv:2305.14430 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2023
[40]

Light-QuarkSU(3) Flavour Splitting of Heavy-Light Constituent Diquark Masses and Doubly-Strange Diquarks from QCD Sum-Rules,

T. de Oliveira, D. Harnett, R. Kleiv, A. Palameta and T. G. Steele, “Light-QuarkSU(3) Flavour Splitting of Heavy-Light Constituent Diquark Masses and Doubly-Strange Diquarks from QCD Sum-Rules,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.5, 054036 (2023) [arXiv:2307.15815 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2023
[41]

Strong decays ofT a c¯s0(2900)++/0 as a fully open-flavor tetraquark state,

D. K. Lian, W. Chen, H. X. Chen, L. Y. Dai and T. G. Steele, “Strong decays ofT a c¯s0(2900)++/0 as a fully open-flavor tetraquark state,” Eur. Phys. J. C84, no.1, 1 (2024) [arXiv:2302.01167 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2024
[42]

Charmed-strange tetraquarks and their decays in the potential quark model,

F. X. Liu, R. H. Ni, X. H. Zhong and Q. Zhao, “Charmed-strange tetraquarks and their decays in the potential quark model,” Phys. Rev. D107, no.9, 096020 (2023) [arXiv:2211.01711 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2023
[43]

P-wave coupled-channel scattering ofB sπ, B ∗ s π, B K, B ∗Kand the puzzlingX(5568),

X. W. Kang and J. A. Oller, “P-wave coupled-channel scattering ofB sπ, B ∗ s π, B K, B ∗Kand the puzzlingX(5568),” Phys. Rev. D94, no.5, 054010 (2016) [arXiv:1606.06665 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[44]

Is the newly reportedX(5568) aB ¯Kmolecular state?,

R. Chen and X. Liu, “Is the newly reportedX(5568) aB ¯Kmolecular state?,” Phys. Rev. D94, no.3, 034006 (2016) [arXiv:1607.05566 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[45]

B sπ–B ¯Kinteractions in finite volume andX(5568),

J. X. Lu, X. L. Ren and L. S. Geng, “B sπ–B ¯Kinteractions in finite volume andX(5568),” Eur. Phys. J. C77, no.2, 94 (2017) [arXiv:1607.06327 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2017
[46]

Study of X(5568) in a unitary coupled-channel approximation ofB ¯KandB sπ,

B. X. Sun, F. Y. Dong and J. L. Pang, “Study of X(5568) in a unitary coupled-channel approximation ofB ¯KandB sπ,” Chin. Phys. C41, no.7, 074104 (2017) [arXiv:1609.04068 [nucl-th]]

work page arXiv 2017
[47]

The possibleBπmolecular state and its radiative decay,

H. W. Ke, L. Gao and X. Q. Li, “The possibleBπmolecular state and its radiative decay,” Eur. Phys. J. C77, no.5, 285 (2017) [arXiv:1612.08390 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2017
[48]

Molecular picture for theX 0(2866) as aD ∗ ¯K ∗ J P = 0+ state and related 1 +,2 + states,

R. Molina and E. Oset, “Molecular picture for theX 0(2866) as aD ∗ ¯K ∗ J P = 0+ state and related 1 +,2 + states,” Phys. Lett. B811, 135870 (2020) [erratum: Phys. Lett. B837, 137645 (2023)] [arXiv:2008.11171 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2020
[49]

X 0(2900) and its heavy quark spin partners in molecular picture,

M. W. Hu, X. Y. Lao, P. Ling and Q. Wang, “X 0(2900) and its heavy quark spin partners in molecular picture,” Chin. Phys. C45, no.2, 021003 (2021) [arXiv:2008.06894 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2021
[50]

X1(2900) as a ¯D1Kmolecule,

H. Chen, H. R. Qi and H. Q. Zheng, “X1(2900) as a ¯D1Kmolecule,” Eur. Phys. J. C81, no.9, 812 (2021) [arXiv:2108.02387 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2021
[51]

Prediction of possibleDK 1 bound states,

X. K. Dong and B. S. Zou, “Prediction of possibleDK 1 bound states,” Eur. Phys. J. A57, no.4, 139 (2021) [arXiv:2009.11619 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2021
[52]

Looking for the exoticX 0(2866) and itsJ P = 1+ partner in the ¯B0 →D (∗)+K −K(∗)0 reactions,

L. R. Dai, R. Molina and E. Oset, “Looking for the exoticX 0(2866) and itsJ P = 1+ partner in the ¯B0 →D (∗)+K −K(∗)0 reactions,” Phys. Rev. D105, no.9, 096022 (2022) [arXiv:2202.11973 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[53]

Molecular picture forX 0(2900) andX 1(2900),

J. He and D. Y. Chen, “Molecular picture forX 0(2900) andX 1(2900),” Chin. Phys. C45, no.6, 063102 (2021) [arXiv:2008.07782 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2021
[54]

X 0(2866) as aD ∗ ¯K ∗ molecular state,

M. Z. Liu, J. J. Xie and L. S. Geng, “X 0(2866) as aD ∗ ¯K ∗ molecular state,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.9, 091502 (2020) [arXiv:2008.07389 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2020
[55]

Strong decays of ¯D∗K ∗ molecules and the newly observedX 0,1 states,

Y. Huang, J. X. Lu, J. J. Xie and L. S. Geng, “Strong decays of ¯D∗K ∗ molecules and the newly observedX 0,1 states,” Eur. Phys. J. C80, no.10, 973 (2020) [arXiv:2008.07959 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2020
[56]

How to understand the X(2900)?,

B. Wang and S. L. Zhu, “How to understand the X(2900)?,” Eur. Phys. J. C82, no.5, 419 (2022) [arXiv:2107.09275 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[57]

Study of the decays ofS−wave ¯D∗K ∗ hadronic molecules: The scalarX 0(2900) and its spin partnersX J(J=1,2) ,

C. J. Xiao, D. Y. Chen, Y. B. Dong and G. W. Meng, “Study of the decays ofS−wave ¯D∗K ∗ hadronic molecules: The scalarX 0(2900) and its spin partnersX J(J=1,2) ,” Phys. Rev. D103, no.3, 034004 (2021) [arXiv:2009.14538 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2021
[58]

On the structures of new scalar resonancesT a cs0(2900)++ andT a cs0(2900)0,

S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, “On the structures of new scalar resonancesT a cs0(2900)++ andT a cs0(2900)0,” J. Phys. G50, no.5, 055002 (2023) [arXiv:2207.02648 [hep-ph]]. 21

work page arXiv 2023
[59]

Possible molecular states of ¯D∗K ∗ (D∗K ∗) and new exotic statesX 0(2900), X1(2900),T 0 cs0(2900)0 andT a cs0(2900)++,

H. W. Ke, Y. F. Shi, X. H. Liu and X. Q. Li, “Possible molecular states of ¯D∗K ∗ (D∗K ∗) and new exotic statesX 0(2900), X1(2900),T 0 cs0(2900)0 andT a cs0(2900)++,” Phys. Rev. D106, no.11, 114032 (2022) [arXiv:2210.06215 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[60]

Searching for the open flavor tetraquarkT c¯s0(2900)++ in the processB + → K+D+D−,

M. Y. Duan, E. Wang and D. Y. Chen, “Searching for the open flavor tetraquarkT c¯s0(2900)++ in the processB + → K+D+D−,” Eur. Phys. J. C84, no.7, 681 (2024) [arXiv:2305.09436 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2024
[61]

Roles of ¯D∗K ∗ andD ∗ ¯Dmolecular states in decayB + →D ∗+D−K+,

Z. M. Ding, Q. Huang and J. He, “Roles of ¯D∗K ∗ andD ∗ ¯Dmolecular states in decayB + →D ∗+D−K+,” Eur. Phys. J. C85, no.10, 1133 (2025) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14882-8 [arXiv:2508.12686 [hep-ph]]

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14882-8 2025
[62]

Coupled-channelD ∗K ∗ −D ∗ s ρinteractions and the origin ofT c¯s0(2900),

M. Y. Duan, M. L. Du, Z. H. Guo, E. Wang and D. Y. Chen, “Coupled-channelD ∗K ∗ −D ∗ s ρinteractions and the origin ofT c¯s0(2900),” Phys. Rev. D108, no.7, 074006 (2023) [arXiv:2307.04092 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2023
[63]

Five-flavor molecular pentaquarks in the Ξ (′,∗) b ¯D(∗) and Ξ(′,∗) c B(∗) systems,

F. L. Wang and X. Liu, “Five-flavor molecular pentaquarks in the Ξ (′,∗) b ¯D(∗) and Ξ(′,∗) c B(∗) systems,” [arXiv:2603.23287 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[64]

Searching for the 2 + partner of theT cs0(2870) in theB − →D −D0K0 S reaction,

J. Song, Z. Y. Yang and E. Oset, “Searching for the 2 + partner of theT cs0(2870) in theB − →D −D0K0 S reaction,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.9, 094004 (2025) [arXiv:2502.10342 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2025
[65]

T 0 ¯c¯s1production in theB + decays processes,

Z. Yu, Q. Wu, Z. L. Yue and D. Y. Chen, “T 0 ¯c¯s1production in theB + decays processes,” [arXiv:2511.18072 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv
[66]

Exotic $T^*_{csJ}$ and $T^*_{c\bar{s}J}$ states and coupled-channel scattering at the $SU(3)$ flavour symmetric point from lattice QCD

J. D. E. Yeo, C. E. Thomas and D. J. Wilson, “ExoticT ∗ csJ andT ∗ c¯sJstates and coupled-channel scattering at theSU(3) flavour symmetric point from lattice QCD,” [arXiv:2604.19553 [hep-lat]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[67]

Triangle singularity as the origin ofX 0(2900) andX 1(2900) observed inB + →D +D−K+,

X. H. Liu, M. J. Yan, H. W. Ke, G. Li and J. J. Xie, “Triangle singularity as the origin ofX 0(2900) andX 1(2900) observed inB + →D +D−K+,” Eur. Phys. J. C80, no.12, 1178 (2020) [arXiv:2008.07190 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2020
[68]

Possibility ofT c¯s(2900) as the resonance-like structure induced by threshold effects,

Y. H. Ge, X. H. Liu and H. W. Ke, “Possibility ofT c¯s(2900) as the resonance-like structure induced by threshold effects,” Eur. Phys. J. C82, no.10, 955 (2022) [arXiv:2207.09900 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[69]

Kinematical cusp and resonance interpretations of theX(2900),

T. J. Burns and E. S. Swanson, “Kinematical cusp and resonance interpretations of theX(2900),” Phys. Lett. B813, 136057 (2021) [arXiv:2008.12838 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2021
[70]

Spectrum and rearrangement decays of tetraquark states with four different flavors,

J. B. Cheng, S. Y. Li, Y. R. Liu, Y. N. Liu, Z. G. Si and T. Yao, “Spectrum and rearrangement decays of tetraquark states with four different flavors,” Phys. Rev. D101, no.11, 114017 (2020) [arXiv:2001.05287 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2020
[71]

X(4140),X(4270),X(4500) andX(4700) and theircs¯c¯stetraquark partners,

J. Wu, Y. R. Liu, K. Chen, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, “X(4140),X(4270),X(4500) andX(4700) and theircs¯c¯stetraquark partners,” Phys. Rev. D94, no.9, 094031 (2016) [arXiv:1608.07900 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[72]

Pentaquark states with theQQQq¯qconfiguration in a simple model,

S. Y. Li, Y. R. Liu, Y. N. Liu, Z. G. Si and J. Wu, “Pentaquark states with theQQQq¯qconfiguration in a simple model,” Eur. Phys. J. C79, no.1, 87 (2019) [arXiv:1809.08072 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2019
[73]

Systematic studies of charmonium-, bottomonium-, andB c-like tetraquark states,

J. Wu, X. Liu, Y. R. Liu and S. L. Zhu, “Systematic studies of charmonium-, bottomonium-, andB c-like tetraquark states,” Phys. Rev. D99, no.1, 014037 (2019) [arXiv:1810.06886 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2019
[74]

Liu, H.-X

Y. R. Liu, H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, “Pentaquark and Tetraquark states,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.107, 237-320 (2019) [arXiv:1903.11976 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2019
[75]

Hidden-charm pentaquarks and their hidden-bottom andB c-like partner states,

J. Wu, Y. R. Liu, K. Chen, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, “Hidden-charm pentaquarks and their hidden-bottom andB c-like partner states,” Phys. Rev. D95, no.3, 034002 (2017) [arXiv:1701.03873 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2017
[76]

Heavy-flavored tetraquark states with theQQ ¯Q ¯Qconfiguration,

J. Wu, Y. R. Liu, K. Chen, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, “Heavy-flavored tetraquark states with theQQ ¯Q ¯Qconfiguration,” Phys. Rev. D97, no.9, 094015 (2018) [arXiv:1605.01134 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2018
[77]

X(3960), X 0(4140), and other compact states*,

S. Y. Li, Y. R. Liu, Z. L. Man, Z. G. Si and J. Wu, “X(3960), X 0(4140), and other compact states*,” Chin. Phys. C48, no.6, 063109 (2024) [arXiv:2308.06768 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2024
[78]

Hidden-charm pentaquark states in a mass splitting model,

S. Y. Li, Y. R. Liu, Z. L. Man, Z. G. Si and J. Wu, “Hidden-charm pentaquark states in a mass splitting model,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.5, 056015 (2023) [arXiv:2307.00539 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2023
[79]

Triply Heavy Tetraquark States in a Mass-Splitting Model,

S. Y. Li, Y. R. Liu, Z. L. Man, C. R. Shu, Z. G. Si and J. Wu, “Triply Heavy Tetraquark States in a Mass-Splitting Model,” Symmetry17, no.2, 170 (2025) [arXiv:2501.16105 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2025
[80]

Doubly heavy tetraquark states in a mass splitting model,

S. Y. Li, Y. R. Liu, Z. L. Man, Z. G. Si and J. Wu, “Doubly heavy tetraquark states in a mass splitting model,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.9, 094044 (2024) [arXiv:2401.00115 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.