pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05825 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 💻 cs.RO

A Comparative Study of INDI and NDI with Nonlinear Disturbance Observer for Aerial Robotics

Benedetta Rota , Mirko Mizzoni , Amr Afifi , Pieter van Goor , Antonio Franchi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 09:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords INDINDInonlinear disturbance observeraerial roboticsrobustness analysissimulation studycontrol comparisonfully actuated robots
0
0 comments X

The pith

INDI exhibits stronger robustness than NDI with nonlinear disturbance observer under model mismatches and stresses in aerial robot simulations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper conducts a simulation-based comparison of two inversion-based control approaches for fully actuated aerial robots. It evaluates Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion (INDI) against Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion augmented with a nonlinear disturbance observer (NDI+NDO) by measuring tracking performance, robustness, and control effort across scenarios with parametric variations, external disturbances, and measurement noise. The analysis finds that INDI maintains superior performance in cases of model mismatch and combined stresses, while NDI+NDO performs adequately under nominal conditions but shows greater degradation when conditions deviate from the ideal model. These results offer practical guidance for selecting control strategies in aerial robotics where exact models are difficult to obtain.

Core claim

Through a systematic simulation campaign across representative operating scenarios, the study shows that INDI demonstrates stronger robustness in several model-mismatch and combined-stress cases, while NDI+NDO primarily matches nominal performance but exhibits greater sensitivity under several non-ideal conditions.

What carries the argument

The side-by-side simulation evaluation of Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion (INDI) versus Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion with nonlinear disturbance observer (NDI+NDO) on tracking, robustness, and effort metrics under controlled parametric and disturbance variations.

If this is right

  • INDI becomes the preferred choice for aerial robot tasks involving significant model uncertainty or simultaneous disturbances.
  • NDI+NDO remains viable for systems with accurate models and low variation but requires extra safeguards under non-ideal conditions.
  • Control engineers should weigh incremental versus observer-based inversion when designing for reliability in uncertain environments.
  • Simulation campaigns of this type can narrow design options before hardware implementation.
  • The relative sensitivity of NDI+NDO highlights the value of testing inversion methods under combined stresses rather than isolated variations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These robustness differences imply that INDI may lower the calibration effort needed for aerial robots operating in variable conditions.
  • Similar comparative studies could be extended to hybrid controllers that combine incremental and observer elements.
  • Real-world validation on physical platforms under actual wind and payload changes would strengthen or qualify the simulation trends.
  • The findings connect to broader questions of how inversion methods scale when model knowledge is partial or time-varying.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen simulation scenarios and parametric variations are representative of the disturbances and uncertainties encountered by real fully actuated aerial robots.

What would settle it

A hardware flight test on a physical fully actuated aerial robot under comparable model mismatches, combined disturbances, and noise that shows NDI+NDO matching or exceeding INDI in robustness metrics would falsify the comparative claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05825 by Amr Afifi, Antonio Franchi, Benedetta Rota, Mirko Mizzoni, Pieter van Goor.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Block-diagram comparison between the INDI and view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Three-dimensional tracking performance of INDI (blue) and view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Full-horizon RMS tracking errors for INDI (blue) and view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: RMS tracking error for INDI (blue) and NDI+NDO (red) view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Energy of the commanded wrench, computed as T view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This work presents a simulation-based comparative robustness analysis of Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion (INDI) and Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion augmented with a nonlinear disturbance observer (NDI+NDO) for fully actuated aerial robots. A systematic simulation campaign across representative operating scenarios is conducted, where we compare tracking performance, robustness, control effort, under parametric variations, external disturbances, and measurement noise. Results show that INDI demonstrates stronger robustness in several model-mismatch and combined-stress cases, while NDI+NDO primarily matches nominal performance but exhibits greater sensitivity under several non-ideal conditions. These findings provide practical guidance on the relative strengths and limitations of incremental and observer-based inversion strategies for aerial robotic applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a simulation-based comparative robustness analysis of Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion (INDI) versus Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion augmented with a nonlinear disturbance observer (NDI+NDO) for fully actuated aerial robots. It evaluates tracking performance, robustness, and control effort across operating scenarios involving parametric variations, external disturbances, and measurement noise, concluding that INDI exhibits stronger robustness under model-mismatch and combined-stress conditions while NDI+NDO matches nominal performance but shows greater sensitivity to non-ideal conditions, thereby offering practical guidance for controller selection in aerial robotics.

Significance. If the simulation results are representative, the work provides empirical evidence on the relative robustness trade-offs between incremental and observer-based inversion strategies, which could inform practical controller design choices for aerial robots. The study is purely comparative and empirical with no new theoretical derivations, proofs, or parameter-free results; its value is limited by the absence of hardware validation or cross-checks against real flight data.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that INDI 'demonstrates stronger robustness in several model-mismatch and combined-stress cases' is not supported by any quantitative metrics, error norms, statistical tests, or tabulated performance values, making it impossible to assess the practical magnitude of the reported gaps.
  2. [Simulation Results] Simulation campaign (assumed §4–5): the extension to 'practical guidance for aerial robotic applications' rests on the unverified assumption that the chosen parametric variations, disturbance models, and noise levels adequately proxy real-world conditions such as unmodeled actuator lags, aerodynamic effects, or sensor biases; no hardware experiments or flight-data cross-validation are reported to support this.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Results] Clarify the exact performance indices (e.g., RMSE, control effort integrals) and statistical methods used to declare 'stronger robustness' or 'greater sensitivity' in the results section.
  2. Ensure consistent notation for controller parameters and disturbance models across figures and text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our simulation-based comparative study. We address each major comment below and outline revisions to improve clarity and qualification of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that INDI 'demonstrates stronger robustness in several model-mismatch and combined-stress cases' is not supported by any quantitative metrics, error norms, statistical tests, or tabulated performance values, making it impossible to assess the practical magnitude of the reported gaps.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from quantitative backing. In the revised manuscript, we will incorporate specific metrics from our simulation results, including RMS tracking errors, peak control efforts, and relative robustness margins under the model-mismatch and combined-stress scenarios, to substantiate the claims and allow assessment of the observed differences. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Simulation Results] Simulation campaign (assumed §4–5): the extension to 'practical guidance for aerial robotic applications' rests on the unverified assumption that the chosen parametric variations, disturbance models, and noise levels adequately proxy real-world conditions such as unmodeled actuator lags, aerodynamic effects, or sensor biases; no hardware experiments or flight-data cross-validation are reported to support this.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the study is purely simulation-based and does not include hardware validation or flight-data cross-checks, which limits direct extrapolation to physical systems. The chosen variations and noise models were selected as representative of typical aerial robot challenges drawn from prior literature. We will revise the manuscript to explicitly state these limitations, qualify the simulation assumptions (e.g., ideal actuators and absence of unmodeled aerodynamics), and rephrase the 'practical guidance' as simulation-informed insights for controller selection rather than validated real-world recommendations. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Absence of hardware experiments or real flight-data validation, as the manuscript is limited to simulation studies.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely empirical controller comparison

full rationale

The paper performs a simulation-based robustness comparison of two established controllers (INDI and NDI+NDO) across parametric variations, disturbances, and noise. No derivations, first-principles predictions, fitted parameters renamed as outputs, or uniqueness theorems appear. Claims rest on direct simulation outcomes rather than any self-referential reduction, self-citation chain, or ansatz smuggling. The work is self-contained as an empirical study with no load-bearing steps that collapse to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No theoretical derivation is present; the work consists of simulation experiments only.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5422 in / 1013 out tokens · 63753 ms · 2026-05-08T09:20:12.458350+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 299 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sun and X

    S. Sun and X. Wang and D. Sanalitro and A. Franchi and M. Tognon and J. Alonso-Mora , title =. 2025 , volume =

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Alharbat and C

    A. Alharbat and C. Gabellieri and A. Mersha and A. Franchi , title =. 2025 , volume =

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Mizzoni and A

    M. Mizzoni and A. Afifi and A. Franchi , title =. 2025 , volume =. doi:10.1109/LCSYS.2025.3601657 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/lcsys.2025.3601657 2025

  4. [4]

    Ollero and A

    A. Ollero and A. Suarez and C. Papaioannidis and I. Pitas and J. M. Marredo and V. Duong and E. Ebeid and V. Kr\'atk\'y and M. Saska and C. Hanoune and A. Afifi and A. Franchi and C. Vourtsis and D. Floreano and G. Vasiljevic and S. Bogdan and A. Caballero and F. Ruggiero and V. Lippiello and C. Matilla and G. Cioffi and D. Scaramuzza and J. R. Martinez-d...

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Gabellieri and L

    C. Gabellieri and L. Teeuwen and Y. Shen and A. Franchi , title =. 2025. 2025 , month =

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Shen and A

    Y. Shen and A. Franchi and C. Gabellieri , title =. 2025 , volume =

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Gerges and B

    B. Gerges and B. Bazzana and N. Botteghi and Y. Aboudorra and A. Franchi , title =. 2025. 2025 , month =

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Indukumar and A

    G. Indukumar and A. Saccon and A. Franchi and C. Gabellieri , title =. 2025. 2025 , month =

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Mizzoni and P

    M. Mizzoni and P. Unified Feedback Linearization for Nonlinear Systems with Dexterous and Energy-Saving Modes , journal = lcss, year =

    work page

  10. [10]

    F. F. Nyboe and A. Afifi and P. Embedded Robust Model Predictive Path Integral Control using Sensitivity Tubes and. 2025. 2025 , address =

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Srour and A

    A. Srour and A. Franchi and P. Experimental Validation of Sensitivity-Aware Trajectory Planning for a Redundant Robotic Manipulator Under Payload Uncertainty , journal = ral, year =. doi:10.1109/LRA.2024.3519857 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2024.3519857 2024

  12. [12]

    Ali and C

    A. Ali and C. Gabellieri and A. Franchi , title =. 63rd. 2024 , address =

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Afifi and T

    A. Afifi and T. Belvedere and A. Pupa and P. Safe and Robust Planning for Uncertain Robots: A Closed-Loop State Sensitivity Approach , journal = ral, year =. doi:10.1109/LRA.2024.3468088 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2024.3468088 2024

  14. [14]

    Lai and C

    G. Lai and C. Shi and K. Wang and Y. Yu and Y. Dong and A. Franchi , title =. 2024 , volume =. doi:10.1109/LRA.2024.3407579 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2024.3407579 2024

  15. [15]

    Gabellieri and A

    C. Gabellieri and A. Franchi , title =. 2024. 2024 , address =. doi:10.1109/ICUAS60882.2024.10556930 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/icuas60882.2024.10556930 2024

  16. [16]

    Bazzana and R

    B. Bazzana and R. Brantjes and C. Gabellieri and A. Franchi , title =. 2024. 2024 , address =. doi:, keywords =

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Srour and S

    A. Srour and S. Marcellini and T. Belvedere, M. Cognetti and A. Franchi and P. Experimental Validation of Sensitivity-Aware Trajectory Planning for a Quadrotor. 2024. 2024 , address =. doi:, keywords =

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Zoric and A

    F. Zoric and A. Franchi and M. Orsag and Z. Kovacic and C. Gabellieri , title =. 2024. 2024 , address =. doi:, keywords =

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Aboudorra and A

    Y. Aboudorra and A. Saini and A. Franchi , title =. 2024. 2024 , address =. doi:, keywords =

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Aboudorra and C

    Y. Aboudorra and C. Gabellieri and R. Brantjes and Q. Sabl\'e and A. Franchi , title =. 2024 , volume =. doi:10.1007/s10846-024-02054-x , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1007/s10846-024-02054-x 2024

  21. [21]

    Ferrentino and H

    E. Ferrentino and H. Savino and A. Franchi and P. Chiacchio , title =. 2023 , volume =. doi:10.1109/TASE.2023.3330371 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/tase.2023.3330371 2023

  22. [22]

    Hamandi and I

    M. Hamandi and I. Al-Ali and L. Seneviratne and A. Franchi and Y. Zweiri , title =. 2023 , volume =. doi:10.1109/LRA.2023.3290422 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2023.3290422 2023

  23. [23]

    Srour and A

    A. Srour and A. Franchi and P. Controller and Trajectory Optimization for a Quadrotor. 2023. 2023 , address =

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Gabellieri and M

    C. Gabellieri and M. Tognon and D. Sanalitro and A. Franchi , title =. 2023. 2023 , address =

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Gabellieri and M

    C. Gabellieri and M. Tognon and D. Sanalitro and A. Franchi , title =. 2023 , volume =. doi:10.1109/TRO.2023.3279033 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/tro.2023.3279033 2023

  26. [26]

    Afifi and G

    A. Afifi and G. Corsini and Q. Sabl\'e and Y. Aboudorra and D. Sidobre and A. Franchi , title =. 2023. 2023 , address =

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Sun and A

    S. Sun and A. Franchi , title =. 2023. 2023 , address =

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Silano and A

    G. Silano and A. Afifi and M. Saska and A. Franchi , title =. 2023. 2023 , address =

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Gabellieri and A

    C. Gabellieri and A. Franchi , title =. 2023. 2023 , address =

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Rossi and M

    E. Rossi and M. Tognon and L. Ballotta and R. Carli and J. Cort\'es and A. Franchi and L. Schenato , title =. 2023 , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2023.110941 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2023.110941 2023

  31. [31]

    Coelho and A

    A. Coelho and A. Albu-Schaeffer and A. Sachtler and H. Mishra and D. Bicego and C. Ott and A. Franchi , title =. 61th. 2022 , address =

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Jacquet and A

    M. Jacquet and A. Franchi , title =. 2022. 2022 , address =

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Corsini and M

    G. Corsini and M. Jacquet and H. Das and A Afifi and D. Sidobre and A. Franchi , title =. 2022. 2022 , address =

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    Rothammer and A

    M. Rothammer and A. Coelho and H. Mishra and C. Ott and A. Franchi and A. Albu-Schaeffer , title =. 2022 , volume =. doi:10.1109/LCSYS.2022.3187349 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/lcsys.2022.3187349 2022

  35. [35]

    Rashad and D

    R. Rashad and D. Bicego and J. Zult and S. Energy Aware Impedance Control of a Flying End-effector in the Port-. 2022 , volume =. doi:10.1109/TRO.2022.3183532 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/tro.2022.3183532 2022

  36. [36]

    Jimenez-Cano and D

    A. Jimenez-Cano and D. Sanalitro and M. Tognon and A. Franchi and J. Cort\'es , title =. 2022 , volume =. doi:10.1007/s10846-022-01668-3 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1007/s10846-022-01668-3 2022

  37. [37]

    Sanalitro and M

    D. Sanalitro and M. Tognon and A. Jimenez-Cano and J. Cort\'es and A. Franchi , title =. 2022 , volume =. doi:10.1109/LRA.2022.3176457 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2022.3176457 2022

  38. [38]

    Alharbat and H

    A. Alharbat and H. Esmaeeli and D. Bicego and A. Mersha and A. Franchi , title =. 2022. 2022 , address =

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Afifi and M

    A. Afifi and M. Toward Physical Human-Robot Interaction Control with Aerial Manipulators: Compliance, Redundancy Resolution, and Input Limits , booktitle = "2022 "#icra, year =

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Jacquet and M

    M. Jacquet and M. Kivits and H. Das and A. Franchi , title =. 2022 , volume =. doi:10.1109/LRA.2022.3143218 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2022.3143218 2022

  41. [41]

    Pierri and A

    F. Pierri and A. Franchi , title =. Encyclopedia of Robotics , year =. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41610-1_177-1 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41610-1_177-1

  42. [42]

    Mohammadi and D

    M. Mohammadi and D. Bicego and A. Franchi and D. Barcelli and D. Prattichizzo , title =. Applied Sciences, Special issue on Aerial Robotics for Inspection and Maintenance. 2021 , volume =. doi:10.3390/app11198955 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.3390/app11198955 2021

  43. [43]

    Hamandi and Q

    M. Hamandi and Q. Sable and M. Tognon and A. Franchi , title =. 1st. 2021 , address =

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Corsini and M

    G. Corsini and M. Jacquet and A. E. A General Control Architecture for Visual Servoing and Physical Interaction Tasks for Fully-actuated Aerial Vehicles , booktitle = "1st "#airpharo, year =

    work page

  45. [45]

    Towards Safe Human-Quadrotor Interaction: Mixed-Initiative Control via Real-Time

    B. Towards Safe Human-Quadrotor Interaction: Mixed-Initiative Control via Real-Time. 2021 , volume =. doi:10.1109/LRA.2021.3096502 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2021.3096502 2021

  46. [46]

    Coelho and Y

    A. Coelho and Y. Sarkisov and J. Lee and R. Balachandran and A. Franchi and K. Kondak and C. Ott , title =. 2021. 2021 , address =

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Ollero and M

    A. Ollero and M. Tognon and A. Suarez and D. J. Lee and A. Franchi , title =. 2021 , volume =. doi:10.1109/TRO.2021.3084395 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/tro.2021.3084395 2021

  48. [48]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research40(8-9), 1015–1044 (2021)

    M. Hamandi and F. Usai and Q. Sable and N. Staub and M. Tognon and A. Franchi , title =. 2021 , volume =. doi:10.1177/02783649211025998 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1177/02783649211025998 2021

  49. [49]

    Ryll and D

    M. Ryll and D. Bicego and M. Giurato and M. Lovera and A. Franchi , title =. 2021 , volume =. doi:10.1109/TMECH.2021.3099197 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/tmech.2021.3099197 2021

  50. [50]

    Horla and M

    D. Horla and M. Hamandi and W. Giernacki and A. Franchi , title =. 2021 , volume =. doi:10.1109/LRA.2021.3067229 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2021.3067229 2021

  51. [51]

    Baskaya and M

    E. Baskaya and M. Hamandi and M. Bronz and A. Franchi , title =. 2021 , volume =. doi:10.1109/LRA.2021.3067182 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2021.3067182 2021

  52. [52]

    Coelho and Y

    A. Coelho and Y. Sarkisov and X. Wu and H. Mishra and H. Singh and A. Dietrich and A. Franchi and K. Kondak and C. Ott , title =. 2021 , volume =. doi:10.1007/s10846-021-01365-7 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1007/s10846-021-01365-7 2021

  53. [53]

    Jacquet and A

    M. Jacquet and A. Franchi , title =. 2021 , volume =. doi:10.1109/LRA.2020.3045654 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2020.3045654 2021

  54. [55]

    Umili and M

    E. Umili and M. Tognon and D. Sanalitro and G. Oriolo and A. Franchi , title =. 2020. 2020 , address =

    work page 2020

  55. [56]

    Hamandi and K

    M. Hamandi and K. Sawant and M. Tognon and A. Franchi , title =. 2020. 2020 , address =

    work page 2020

  56. [57]

    Petitti and D

    A. Petitti and D. Sanalitro and M. Tognon and A. Milella and J. Cort\'es and A. Franchi , title =. 2020. 2020 , address =

    work page 2020

  57. [58]

    Tognon and A

    M. Tognon and A. Franchi , isbn =. Theory and Applications for Control of Aerial Robots in Physical Interaction Through Tethers , publisher = sv, year =. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48659-4 , series = star, keywords =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48659-4

  58. [59]

    Franchi , title =

    A. Franchi , title =. Encyclopedia of Robotics , year =

    work page

  59. [60]

    Michieletto and A

    G. Michieletto and A. Cenedese and L. Zaccarian and A. Franchi , title =. 2020 , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2020.108991 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2020.108991 2020

  60. [61]

    Hamandi and M.Tognon and A

    M. Hamandi and M.Tognon and A. Franchi , title =. 2020. 2020 , address =

    work page 2020

  61. [62]

    Jacquet and G

    M. Jacquet and G. Corsini and D. Bicego and A. Franchi , title =. 2020. 2020 , address =

    work page 2020

  62. [63]

    Sanalitro and H

    D. Sanalitro and H. J. Savino and M. Tognon and J. Cort\'es and A. Franchi , title =. 2020 , volume =. doi:10.1109/LRA.2020.2969930 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2020.2969930 2020

  63. [64]

    Nava and Q

    G. Nava and Q. Sabl\'e and M. Tognon and D. Pucci and A. Franchi , title =. 2020 , volume =. doi:10.1109/LRA.2019.2958473 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2019.2958473 2020

  64. [65]

    Gabellieri and M

    C. Gabellieri and M. Tognon and D. Sanalitro and L. Palottino and A. Franchi , title =. 2020 , volume =. doi:10.1007/s11721-019-00178-7 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11721-019-00178-7 2020

  65. [66]

    Furci and C

    M. Furci and C. Nainer and L. Zaccarian and A. Franchi , title =. 2019 , volume =. doi:10.1109/TCST.2019.2944341 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/tcst.2019.2944341 2019

  66. [67]

    Michieletto and A

    G. Michieletto and A. Cenedese and A. Franchi , title =. 58th. 2019 , address =

    work page 2019

  67. [68]

    Rossi and M

    E. Rossi and M. Tognon and R. Carli and L. Schenato and J. Cort\'. Cooperative Aerial Load Transportation via Sampled Communication , journal = lcss, year =. doi:10.1109/LCSYS.2019.2924413 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/lcsys.2019.2924413 2019

  68. [69]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research 38(9): 1045--1062

    M. Ryll and G. Muscio and F. Pierri and E. Cataldi and G. Antonelli and F. Caccavale and D. Bicego and A. Franchi , title =. 2019 , volume =. doi:10.1177/0278364919856694 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1177/0278364919856694 2019

  69. [70]

    Walter and N

    V. Walter and N. Staub and A. Franchi and M. Saska , title =. 2019 , volume =. doi:10.1109/LRA.2019.2901683 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2019.2901683 2019

  70. [71]

    Sarkisov and M

    Y. Sarkisov and M. J. Kim and D. Bicego and D. Tsetserukou and C. Ott and A. Franchi and K. Kondak , title =. 2019. 2019 , address =

    work page 2019

  71. [72]

    Tognon and H

    M. Tognon and H. A. A Truly Redundant Aerial Manipulator System with Application to Push-and-Slide Inspection in Industrial Plants , journal = ral, year =. doi:10.1109/LRA.2019.2895880 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2019.2895880 2019

  72. [73]

    Franchi , title =

    A. Franchi , title =. Aerial Robotic Manipulation , year =. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-12945-3 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-12945-3

  73. [74]

    uksel and C. Secchi and H. H. B\

    B. Y\"uksel and C. Secchi and H. H. B\"ulthoff and A. Franchi , title =. 2019 , volume =

    work page 2019

  74. [75]

    Franchi and P

    A. Franchi and P. Online Leader Selection for Improved Collective Tracking and Formation Control: the Second Order Case , journal = tcns, year =. doi:10.1109/TCNS.2019.2891011 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/tcns.2019.2891011 2019

  75. [76]

    Arellano-Quintana and E

    V. Arellano-Quintana and E. Merchan-Cruz and A. Franchi , title =. 2018 , volume =. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2879636 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2018.2879636 2018

  76. [77]

    Staub and M

    N. Staub and M. Mohammadi and D. Bicego and Q. Delamare and H. Yang and D. Prattichizzo and P. 2018 , volume =. doi:10.1109/MRA.2018.2871344 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/mra.2018.2871344 2018

  77. [78]

    Masone and M

    C. Masone and M. Mohammadi and P. Shared Planning and Control for Mobile Robots with Integral Haptic Feedback , journal = ijrr, year =

    work page

  78. [79]

    Yang and N

    H. Yang and N. Staub and A. Franchi and D. Lee , title =. 2018. 2018 , address =. doi:10.1109/IROS.2018.8593834 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/iros.2018.8593834 2018

  79. [80]

    Morbidi and D

    F. Morbidi and D. Bicego and M. Ryll and A. Franchi , title =. 2018. 2018 , address =

    work page 2018

  80. [81]

    Franchi and A

    A. Franchi and A. Petitti and A. Rizzo , title =. 2019 , volume =. doi:10.1109/TCNS.2018.2873153 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/tcns.2018.2873153 2019

Showing first 80 references.