pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05837 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 💻 cs.IT · cs.DS· math.IT

An Additive Approximation Scheme for Generating Dyadic Codings for the Outputs of an LLM

Daniella Bar-Lev , Farzad Farnoud , Ryan Gabrys This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 05:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IT cs.DSmath.IT
keywords dyadic distributionapproximation algorithmrate constrainttotal variation distancetree partitioningLLM codingsteganography
0
0 comments X

The pith

A polynomial-time additive approximation scheme finds near-optimal dyadic distributions for any discrete probability distribution under a fixed rate constraint.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how to replace the next-token distribution of a large language model with a simpler dyadic distribution generated by a binary tree. The replacement must respect a prescribed encoding rate while keeping total variation distance to the original distribution as small as possible. The authors model the task as a tree-based partitioning problem and supply a polynomial-time algorithm that returns a solution whose distance is at most the optimal distance plus a small additive constant, provided the rate stays in the constant-rate regime. This guarantee holds for every discrete distribution, not just particular cases. If the claim is correct, it supplies an efficient, provably good way to produce codings that can later be used to embed hidden data inside LLM-generated text.

Core claim

The central claim is that the tree-based partitioning problem admits a polynomial-time additive approximation algorithm for the rate-constrained dyadic approximation task in the constant-rate regime. The algorithm produces a dyadic distribution whose total variation distance to the input distribution is at most the optimal distance plus an additive error term that does not depend on the support size, and the same guarantee applies uniformly to every discrete distribution.

What carries the argument

The tree-based partitioning problem: partitioning the support of a discrete distribution into groups, assigning dyadic probabilities to those groups, and selecting the partition so that a target rate is met while total variation distance is minimized.

If this is right

  • Near-optimal dyadic codings for LLM token distributions can be computed in polynomial time whenever the rate is held constant.
  • The total variation distance of the produced coding is bounded by the optimal distance plus a fixed additive constant independent of support size.
  • The scheme directly supplies a rate-controlled steganography method in which the chosen rate sets the number of hidden bits per token and the total variation bound limits statistical detectability.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same partitioning approach could be tested on other generative models whose output distributions are also discrete and high-entropy.
  • Extending the additive guarantee to variable-rate regimes or to other distances such as Kullback-Leibler would require only modest changes to the analysis.
  • The method offers a concrete way to trade a small, controlled increase in distance for a large reduction in the complexity of the resulting coding tree.

Load-bearing premise

The tree-based partitioning problem admits a polynomial-time additive approximation algorithm whose guarantee holds for any discrete distribution in the constant-rate regime.

What would settle it

A concrete discrete distribution together with a fixed rate value for which every polynomial-time algorithm produces a dyadic distribution whose total variation distance exceeds the optimal distance by more than the claimed additive term.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05837 by Daniella Bar-Lev, Farzad Farnoud, Ryan Gabrys.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Running example with n = 8 tokens, L = 5 leaves, and probabilities p = (0.30, 0.20, 0.15, 0.12, 0.10, 0.06, 0.05, 0.02). The partition function π : [8] ↠ [5] assigns 17→1, {2, 8}7→2, {3, 7}7→3, 47→4, and {5, 6}7→5, inducing the sets Sj shown at the leaves. The height vector H = (2, 2, 2, 3, 3) satisfies Kraft’s equality P j 2 −hj = 1. Summing the last column of the table gives D(S, H) = 0.17, and the rate … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: 2D DP state-space expansion for L = 3. Arrows denote state transitions via placing an item in Leaf 1 (horizontal), Leaf 2 (vertical), or Leaf 3 (stationary). The final optimum rests at an integer coordinate of (500, 300). Table I illustrates this exact calculation for the terminal nodes branching from F2(500, 300). Evaluating this formula strictly identifies (500, 300) as the optimal assignment. Propositio… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the problem of approximating a discrete probability distribution, such as the next-token distribution of a large language model, by a dyadic distribution induced by a binary tree under encoding rate constraints. The objective is to partition the support of the distribution and assign dyadic probabilities to minimize total variation distance while achieving a prescribed rate. We formulate this task as a tree-based partitioning problem and develop a polynomial-time additive approximation scheme for the rate-constrained setting in the constant-rate regime. Our results provide provable guarantees for near-optimal dyadic approximations and, as an application, yield a principled framework for LLM-based steganography, where the rate maps to bits of hidden information embedded per token and the total variation bound controls statistical detectability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper studies the problem of approximating a discrete probability distribution (e.g., next-token distributions from LLMs) by a dyadic distribution induced by a binary tree, subject to an encoding rate constraint. The objective is to partition the support to minimize total variation distance while meeting a prescribed rate. It formulates the task as a tree-based partitioning problem and claims to develop a polynomial-time additive approximation scheme for the rate-constrained setting in the constant-rate regime, with an application to LLM-based steganography where rate corresponds to hidden bits per token and total variation controls detectability.

Significance. If the claimed polynomial-time additive approximation scheme and its guarantees hold for arbitrary discrete distributions, the work would supply a useful algorithmic primitive for rate-constrained dyadic coding with explicit total-variation bounds. This could be valuable in information-theoretic applications such as steganography, where the constant-rate regime permits efficient computation while controlling statistical distance. The formulation aligns with standard techniques in approximation algorithms for partitioning and coding problems.

major comments (1)
  1. The manuscript asserts the existence of a polynomial-time additive approximation scheme for the tree-based partitioning problem but supplies no algorithm description, proof sketch, or verification details (abstract and visible text). This is load-bearing for the central claim, as the result cannot be assessed or reproduced without these elements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and for highlighting the need for clearer exposition of our central algorithmic result. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The manuscript asserts the existence of a polynomial-time additive approximation scheme for the tree-based partitioning problem but supplies no algorithm description, proof sketch, or verification details (abstract and visible text). This is load-bearing for the central claim, as the result cannot be assessed or reproduced without these elements.

    Authors: The full manuscript contains the requested elements in the main body. Section 3 presents the dynamic-programming algorithm for rate-constrained dyadic partitioning, including pseudocode, the recurrence relation, and an O(n^{2}R) runtime bound for constant rate R. Section 4 gives the proof sketch establishing the additive (1 + o(1)) approximation guarantee on total variation distance under the constant-rate regime. The abstract is intentionally concise, as is conventional, but we will revise the introduction to include an explicit high-level outline of the scheme and a forward reference to these sections so that the algorithmic contribution is immediately visible. We believe the details are already present and reproducible from the submitted text; the revision will only improve accessibility. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper formulates a tree-based partitioning problem to minimize total variation distance under rate constraints and claims to develop a polynomial-time additive approximation scheme that holds for any discrete distribution in the constant-rate regime. This is an independent algorithmic contribution whose guarantee is stated to apply broadly rather than being derived from or equivalent to fitted parameters, self-defined quantities, or prior self-citations within the present work. No equations or steps in the provided abstract reduce the claimed scheme to a tautology or renaming of inputs; the result is presented as a constructive approximation algorithm with provable bounds, making the derivation chain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are specified in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5427 in / 1011 out tokens · 42109 ms · 2026-05-08T05:02:46.128174+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

20 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Approximation schemes for scheduling on parallel machines,

    N. Alon, Y . Azar, G. J. Woeginger, and T. Yadid, “Approximation schemes for scheduling on parallel machines,”Journal of Scheduling, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 55–66, 1998

    work page 1998

  2. [2]

    Bloch and J

    M. Bloch and J. Barros,Physical-Layer Security: From Information Theory to Security Engineering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Additive approximation schemes for load balancing problems,

    M. Buchem and L. Rohwedder, “Additive approximation schemes for load balancing problems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.09333, 2020

    work page arXiv 2007

  4. [4]

    An information-theoretic model for steganography,

    C. Cachin, “An information-theoretic model for steganography,” inProc. 2nd Int. Workshop on Information Hiding (IH), Portland, OR, USA, 1998, pp. 306–318

    work page 1998

  5. [5]

    A PTAS for the multiple subset sum problem with different knapsack capacities,

    A. Caprara, H. Kellerer, and U. Pferschy, “A PTAS for the multiple subset sum problem with different knapsack capacities,”Information Processing Letters, vol. 73, no. 3–4, pp. 111–118, 2000

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    Approximation algorithms for min- imum norm and ordered optimization problems,

    D. Chakrabarty and C. Swamy, “Approximation algorithms for min- imum norm and ordered optimization problems,” inProc. 51st ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), Phoenix, AZ, USA, 2019, pp. 126–137

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    A polynomial time approximation scheme for the multiple knapsack problem,

    C. Chekuri and S. Khanna, “A polynomial time approximation scheme for the multiple knapsack problem,”SIAM Journal on Computing, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 713–728, 2005

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas,Elements of Information Theory, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley-Interscience, 2006

    work page 2006

  9. [9]

    Towards diverse and natural image descriptions via a conditional GAN,

    F. Dai, Y . Zhang, and D. Wang, “Towards diverse and natural image descriptions via a conditional GAN,” inProc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2019

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Fridrich,Steganography in Digital Media: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications

    J. Fridrich,Steganography in Digital Media: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009

    work page 2009

  11. [11]

    M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson,Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. New York, NY , USA: W. H. Free- man, 1979

    work page 1979

  12. [12]

    Tabu search—Part I,

    F. Glover, “Tabu search—Part I,”ORSA Journal on Computing, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 190–206, 1989

    work page 1989

  13. [13]

    OD-Stega: LLM- based near-imperceptible steganography via optimized distributions,

    Y .-S. Huang, P. Just, K. Narayanan, and C. Tian, “OD-Stega: LLM- based near-imperceptible steganography via optimized distributions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.04328, Oct. 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Fast approximation algorithms for the knapsack and sum of subset problems,

    O. H. Ibarra and C. E. Kim, “Fast approximation algorithms for the knapsack and sum of subset problems,”Journal of the ACM, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 463–468, 1975

    work page 1975

  15. [15]

    Kellerer, U

    H. Kellerer, U. Pferschy, and D. Pisinger,Knapsack Problems. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2004

    work page 2004

  16. [16]

    Multi-way number partitioning,

    R. E. Korf, “Multi-way number partitioning,” inProc. 21st Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Pasadena, CA, USA, 2009, pp. 538– 543

    work page 2009

  17. [17]

    Fast approximation algorithms for knapsack problems,

    E. L. Lawler, “Fast approximation algorithms for knapsack problems,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 339–356, 1979

    work page 1979

  18. [18]

    Martello and P

    S. Martello and P. Toth,Knapsack Problems: Algorithms and Computer Implementations. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley, 1990

    work page 1990

  19. [19]

    Approximate algorithms for the 0/1 knapsack problem,

    S. Sahni, “Approximate algorithms for the 0/1 knapsack problem,” Journal of the ACM, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 115–124, 1975

    work page 1975

  20. [20]

    Neural text degeneration with un- likelihood training,

    Z. M. Ziegler and A. M. Rush, “Neural text degeneration with un- likelihood training,” inProc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR), New Orleans, LA, USA, 2019

    work page 2019