pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05841 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Non-Abelian String-Breaking Dynamics on a Qudit Quantum Computer

Manuel John , Keshav Pareek , Peter Tirler , Tim Gollerthan , Michael Meth , Lukas Gerster , Peter Zoller , Daniel Gonz\'alez-Cuadra
show 2 more authors
Torsten V. Zache Martin Ringbauer
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 11:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords non-abelian gauge theorystring breakingquantum simulationqudittrapped ionsSU(2) lattice gauge theoryplaquette interactionsconfinement
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-Abelian string breaking occurs in a pure SU(2) gauge theory simulated on a qudit quantum computer driven by gauge-field self-interactions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes the first quantum simulation of genuine non-Abelian string-breaking dynamics in a pure SU(2) lattice gauge theory on a trapped-ion qudit processor. In these theories the gauge fields themselves carry charge, so their mutual interactions can break confining flux strings even when no dynamical matter is present. The experiment encodes a finite truncation of the gauge-field Hilbert space directly in the native multi-level states of trapped ions and evolves the system via digital Trotter steps on a ladder geometry. It distinguishes stable strings formed by fundamental charges from breakable strings formed by adjoint charges, resolving local oscillations and the coherent creation of gluonic excitations through non-Abelian plaquette terms.

Core claim

The central claim is that gauge-field self-interactions alone drive string breaking in a pure SU(2) lattice gauge theory. Strings connecting fundamental static charges remain unbroken while strings connecting adjoint static charges break coherently through the creation of gluonic excitations. These dynamics are observed in real time on a trapped-ion device that uses qudit levels to represent the truncated gauge fields and applies digital Trotter evolution under the non-Abelian plaquette interactions on a ladder geometry.

What carries the argument

Native qudit Hilbert-space encoding of truncated SU(2) gauge fields on a ladder geometry, evolved by digital Trotter steps under non-Abelian plaquette interactions.

If this is right

  • Strings between fundamental charges remain stable while strings between adjoint charges break due to non-Abelian plaquette interactions.
  • Local oscillations of the string and the coherent production of gluonic excitations can be resolved in real time.
  • Pure-gauge dynamics without dynamical matter suffice to produce string breaking in non-Abelian theories.
  • Qudit hardware enables direct encoding of gauge-group representations that are otherwise costly to simulate with qubits.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same qudit encoding could be applied to SU(3) gauge theories to simulate aspects of QCD confinement if higher-dimensional qudits become available.
  • The observed difference between fundamental and adjoint representations may help isolate which features of confinement arise purely from the gauge-field algebra.
  • Scaling the ladder to larger sizes or higher dimensions would test whether the breaking mechanism persists in the thermodynamic limit.

Load-bearing premise

The finite truncation of the infinite-dimensional SU(2) gauge-field Hilbert space together with the digital Trotter approximation on the ladder geometry faithfully reproduces the qualitative non-Abelian breaking dynamics without dominant cutoff or discretization artifacts.

What would settle it

Repeating the experiment at higher gauge-field truncation levels or with smaller Trotter step sizes and finding qualitatively different breaking times or the absence of breaking would indicate that the reported dynamics are controlled by the approximations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05841 by Daniel Gonz\'alez-Cuadra, Keshav Pareek, Lukas Gerster, Manuel John, Martin Ringbauer, Michael Meth, Peter Tirler, Peter Zoller, Tim Gollerthan, Torsten V. Zache.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (c), we now investigate the parameter depen￾dence of string breaking by varying the parallel coupling strength g 2 ∥ view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Example of time evolution showing all unique populations for view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Example of physicality and gate count as a function view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Gauge theories form the foundation of the Standard Model of particle physics. These theories can exhibit confinement, where charged particles only occur in bound states, connected by flux strings whose energy grows linearly with separation. Simulating the real-time dynamics of such strings, including their breaking, remains a major challenge for classical computations and a promising target for quantum simulations. While recent quantum simulation experiments explored string-breaking dynamics in abelian lattice gauge theories, non-abelian theories are qualitatively distinct because gauge fields themselves carry charge. Here, we report the first quantum simulation of genuine non-abelian string-breaking dynamics in a pure SU($2$) lattice gauge theory, where gauge-field self-interactions drive string breaking even in the absence of dynamical matter. Our results are obtained on a trapped-ion quantum computer, using native qudit Hilbert spaces to encode truncated gauge fields on a ladder geometry and implement digital Trotter dynamics. We experimentally study unbreakable and breakable strings generated by fundamental and adjoint static charges, respectively. We locally resolve string oscillations and coherent string breaking through the creation of gluonic excitations driven by non-abelian plaquette interactions. Our work establishes hardware-efficient, problem-tailored qudit simulations as a promising route for accessing non-perturbative dynamics relevant to high-energy physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first quantum simulation of genuine non-Abelian string-breaking dynamics in a pure SU(2) lattice gauge theory on a trapped-ion qudit quantum computer. Using native qudit encoding of truncated gauge fields on a ladder geometry and digital Trotter evolution, the authors observe string oscillations and coherent breaking for adjoint static charges (driven by gauge-field self-interactions via plaquette terms) but not for fundamental charges, in the absence of dynamical matter.

Significance. If the observed distinction between adjoint and fundamental sources faithfully reflects non-Abelian plaquette-driven dynamics without truncation or discretization artifacts, this constitutes a significant advance in quantum simulation of non-Abelian gauge theories. It demonstrates hardware-efficient qudit encodings for gauge fields and provides experimental access to real-time non-perturbative phenomena relevant to confinement in the Standard Model, where classical methods struggle. The experimental realization on trapped ions with problem-tailored qudits is a clear technical strength.

major comments (3)
  1. [qudit encoding and Hamiltonian implementation] The central claim that string breaking for adjoint (but not fundamental) sources arises specifically from non-Abelian gauge-field self-interactions requires that the finite truncation of the SU(2) link Hilbert space to qudits does not introduce cutoff-induced selection rules or artifacts. The manuscript should include explicit convergence checks with respect to the truncation level (e.g., comparing d=3 vs. d=5 or higher) in the section describing the qudit encoding and Hamiltonian implementation.
  2. [digital Trotter dynamics and results] The first-order Trotter decomposition of the plaquette and electric terms on the ladder geometry, combined with the restricted transverse fluctuations of the ladder, must be shown not to alter the qualitative gluon-pair creation processes or effective string tension that distinguish non-Abelian breaking. Bounds on Trotter error or comparisons to higher-order decompositions are needed to support the attribution to genuine non-Abelian dynamics.
  3. [results and abstract] The abstract and results sections state clear experimental observations of string breaking but provide no quantitative data, error bars, statistical significance, or controls in the provided summary. Full quantitative metrics (e.g., oscillation frequencies, breaking times with uncertainties) and comparison to Abelian benchmarks are required to verify the link between measured signals and the claimed mechanism.
minor comments (2)
  1. [methods] Notation for the truncated gauge-field basis states and the mapping to qudit levels should be clarified with an explicit table or equation to aid reproducibility.
  2. [figures] Figure captions for the time-evolution plots should include the specific truncation level and Trotter step size used in the experiment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the significance of our work and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment in turn and have revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [qudit encoding and Hamiltonian implementation] The central claim that string breaking for adjoint (but not fundamental) sources arises specifically from non-Abelian gauge-field self-interactions requires that the finite truncation of the SU(2) link Hilbert space to qudits does not introduce cutoff-induced selection rules or artifacts. The manuscript should include explicit convergence checks with respect to the truncation level (e.g., comparing d=3 vs. d=5 or higher) in the section describing the qudit encoding and Hamiltonian implementation.

    Authors: We agree that convergence with truncation level is essential to confirm the absence of cutoff artifacts. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection (with accompanying figure in the supplementary material) that compares key observables—string oscillation frequencies and breaking times—between the experimental d=3 truncation and d=5 simulations on small lattices. These checks show that the qualitative distinction between adjoint and fundamental sources, as well as the plaquette-driven breaking mechanism, remains unchanged, supporting that the reported dynamics are not truncation-induced. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [digital Trotter dynamics and results] The first-order Trotter decomposition of the plaquette and electric terms on the ladder geometry, combined with the restricted transverse fluctuations of the ladder, must be shown not to alter the qualitative gluon-pair creation processes or effective string tension that distinguish non-Abelian breaking. Bounds on Trotter error or comparisons to higher-order decompositions are needed to support the attribution to genuine non-Abelian dynamics.

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of quantifying Trotter errors. In the revised methods section we now provide explicit bounds on the first-order Trotter error derived from the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff expansion and from direct numerical comparisons against exact diagonalization on small systems (up to 4 plaquettes). These analyses demonstrate that, for the chosen time step and evolution times, the error does not qualitatively modify the gluon-pair creation processes or the effective string tension that differentiate adjoint from fundamental sources. A brief comparison to a second-order Trotter decomposition on benchmark instances is also included. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [results and abstract] The abstract and results sections state clear experimental observations of string breaking but provide no quantitative data, error bars, statistical significance, or controls in the provided summary. Full quantitative metrics (e.g., oscillation frequencies, breaking times with uncertainties) and comparison to Abelian benchmarks are required to verify the link between measured signals and the claimed mechanism.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need for explicit quantitative metrics. The full manuscript already contains time-series data with statistical error bars obtained from repeated experimental runs; we have now added explicit numerical values for the fitted oscillation frequencies and breaking timescales (with 1σ uncertainties) directly in the results section and abstract. In addition, we have included a side-by-side comparison of the SU(2) ladder dynamics against an Abelian U(1) benchmark simulation under identical truncation and Trotter parameters, further isolating the non-Abelian plaquette contribution. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: central result is experimental observation

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental quantum simulation of non-Abelian string-breaking dynamics in a truncated SU(2) lattice gauge theory on a trapped-ion qudit processor. No load-bearing theoretical derivation is presented whose outputs reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes defined within the same work. The distinction between unbreakable fundamental and breakable adjoint strings follows directly from the standard representation theory of SU(2) and is implemented via the chosen qudit encoding and Trotterized Hamiltonian; the observed dynamics are measured data, not predictions derived from the same dataset. Self-citations to prior gauge-theory or quantum-simulation literature are present but do not carry the central claim. The result is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The simulation rests on standard lattice gauge theory truncations and Trotterization; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • gauge-field truncation level
    Finite cutoff on the infinite-dimensional SU(2) representation space required to fit qudit hardware; value chosen to balance accuracy and qubit overhead.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Digital Trotter approximation accurately reproduces continuous-time gauge dynamics for the chosen step size
    Invoked to justify the implemented time evolution on the quantum processor.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5556 in / 1409 out tokens · 50151 ms · 2026-05-08T11:39:58.452768+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    real-world

    We solve this effective model analytically, with the resulting populations indicated as perturbativein (c). The level scheme also indicates nearby string configurations, with arrows highlighting plaquette-induced transitions connecting them. (c) We experimentally prepare superpositions of two such states: (i) a perpendicular displacement at the center and...

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033

  2. [2]

    Gross, E

    F. Gross, E. Klempt, S. J. Brodsky, A. J. Buras, V. D. Burkert, G. Heinrich, K. Jakobs, C. A. Meyer, K. Orginos, M. Strickland,et al., 50 years of quantum 7 chromodynamics: Introduction and review, The Euro- pean Physical Journal C83, 1125 (2023)

    2023

  3. [3]

    G. S. Bali, H. Neff, T. D¨ ussel, T. Lippert, and K. Schilling (SESAM Collaboration), Observation of string breaking in qcd, Phys. Rev. D71, 114513 (2005)

    2005

  4. [4]

    Hebenstreit, J

    F. Hebenstreit, J. Berges, and D. Gelfand, Real-time dy- namics of string breaking, Physical review letters111, 201601 (2013)

    2013

  5. [5]

    Pepe and U.-J

    M. Pepe and U.-J. Wiese, From decay to complete break- ing: Pulling the strings insu(2) yang-mills theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 191601 (2009)

    2009

  6. [6]

    Troyer and U.-J

    M. Troyer and U.-J. Wiese, Computational complexity and fundamental limitations to fermionic quantum monte carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 170201 (2005)

    2005

  7. [7]

    Altman, K

    E. Altman, K. R. Brown, G. Carleo, L. D. Carr, E. Dem- ler, C. Chin, B. DeMarco, S. E. Economou, M. A. Eriks- son, K.-M. C. Fu, M. Greiner, K. R. Hazzard, R. G. Hulet, A. J. Koll´ ar, B. L. Lev, M. D. Lukin, R. Ma, X. Mi, S. Misra, C. Monroe, K. Murch, Z. Nazario, K.-K. Ni, A. C. Potter, P. Roushan, M. Saffman, M. Schleier- Smith, I. Siddiqi, R. Simmonds,...

    2021

  8. [8]

    A. J. Daley, I. Bloch, C. Kokail, S. Flannigan, N. Pearson, M. Troyer, and P. Zoller, Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation, Nature607, 667 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    C. W. Bauer, Z. Davoudi, A. B. Balantekin, T. Bhat- tacharya, M. Carena, W. A. de Jong, P. Draper, A. El-Khadra, N. Gemelke, M. Hanada, D. Kharzeev, H. Lamm, Y.-Y. Li, J. Liu, M. Lukin, Y. Meurice, C. Monroe, B. Nachman, G. Pagano, J. Preskill, E. Ri- naldi, A. Roggero, D. I. Santiago, M. J. Savage, I. Sid- diqi, G. Siopsis, D. Van Zanten, N. Wiebe, Y. Ya...

    2023

  10. [10]

    A. D. Meglio, K. Jansen, I. Tavernelli, C. Alexandrou, S. Arunachalam, C. W. Bauer, K. Borras, S. Carrazza, A. Crippa, V. Croft, R. de Putter, A. Delgado, V. Dun- jko, D. J. Egger, E. Fernandez-Combarro, E. Fuchs, L. Funcke, D. Gonzalez-Cuadra, M. Grossi, J. C. Hal- imeh, Z. Holmes, S. Kuhn, D. Lacroix, R. Lewis, D. Luc- chesi, M. L. Martinez, F. Meloni, ...

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Montvay and G

    I. Montvay and G. M¨ unster,Quantum fields on a lattice (Cambridge University Press, 1997)

    1997

  12. [12]

    Monroe, W

    C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko, and N. Y. Yao, Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025001 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    Gross and I

    C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Science357, 995 (2017)

    2017

  14. [14]

    A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni, Quantum science with optical tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules, Nature Physics17, 1324 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    Kjaergaard, M

    M. Kjaergaard, M. E. Schwartz, J. Braum¨ uller, P. Krantz, J. I.-J. Wang, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Superconducting qubits: Current state of play, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics11, 369 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    T. A. Cochran, B. Jobst, E. Rosenberg, and et al., Vi- sualizing dynamics of charges and strings in (2 + 1)D lattice gauge theories, Nature642, 315 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    Gonzalez-Cuadra, M

    D. Gonzalez-Cuadra, M. Hamdan, T. V. Zache, B. Braverman, M. Kornjaˇ ca, A. Lukin, S. H. Cant´ u, F. Liu, S.-T. Wang, A. Keesling, M. D. Lukin, P. Zoller, and A. Bylinskii, Observation of string breaking on a (2 + 1)d rydberg quantum simulator, Nature642, 321 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    Liu, W.-Y

    Y. Liu, W.-Y. Zhang, Z.-H. Zhu, M.-G. He, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan, String-breaking mechanism in a lattice schwinger model simulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 101902 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    Alexandrou, A

    C. Alexandrou, A. Athenodorou, K. Blekos, G. Polykratis, and S. K¨ uhn, Realizing string breaking dynamics in a𭟋 2 lattice gauge theory on quantum hardware, Phys. Rev. D112, 114506 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    Crippa, K

    A. Crippa, K. Jansen, and E. Rinaldi, Analysis of the con- finement string in (2+ 1)-dimensional quantum electro- dynamics with a trapped-ion quantum computer, Com- munications Physics (2026)

    2026

  21. [21]

    A. De, A. Lerose, D. Luo, F. M. Surace, A. Schuckert, E. R. Bennewitz, B. Ware, W. Morong, K. S. Collins, Z. Davoudi, A. V. Gorshkov, O. Katz, and C. Monroe, Observation of string-breaking dynamics in a quantum simulator (2024), arXiv:2410.13815

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Cobos, J

    J. Cobos, J. Fraxanet, C. Benito, F. di Marcanto- nio, P. Rivero, K. Kap´ as, M. A. Werner, ¨Ors Legeza, A. Bermudez, and E. Rico, Real-time dynamics in a (2+1)-d gauge theory: The stringy nature on a supercon- ducting quantum simulator (2025), arXiv:2507.08088

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Observation of genuine $2+1$D string dynamics in a U$(1)$ lattice gauge theory with a tunable plaquette term on a trapped-ion quantum computer

    R. Joshi, Y. Tian, K. Hemery, N. S. Srivatsa, J. J. Os- borne, H. Dreyer, E. Rinaldi, and J. C. Halimeh, Ob- servation of genuine 2 + 1d string dynamics in a u(1) lattice gauge theory with a tunable plaquette term on a trapped-ion quantum computer (2026), arXiv:2604.07436 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    K. Xu, U. Borla, K. Hemery, R. Joshi, H. Dreyer, E. Ri- naldi, and J. C. Halimeh, Observation of glueball ex- citations and string breaking in a 2 + 1dZ 2 lattice gauge theory on a trapped-ion quantum computer (2026), arXiv:2604.07435 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Ringbauer, M

    M. Ringbauer, M. Meth, L. Postler, R. Stricker, R. Blatt, P. Schindler, and T. Monz, A universal qudit quantum processor with trapped ions, Nature Physics18, 1053 (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    Methet al., Simulating two-dimensional lattice gauge theories on a qudit quantum computer, Nature Physics 10.1038/s41567-025-02797-w (2025)

    M. Methet al., Simulating two-dimensional lattice gauge theories on a qudit quantum computer, Nature Physics 10.1038/s41567-025-02797-w (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-025-02797-w 2025

  27. [27]

    T. V. Zache, D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, and P. Zoller, Quan- tum and classical spin-network algorithms forq-deformed kogut-susskind gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 171902 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Hayata and Y

    T. Hayata and Y. Hidaka, String-net formulation of hamiltonian lattice yang-mills theories and quantum many-body scars in a nonabelian gauge theory, Journal of High Energy Physics2023, 126 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    Hayata and Y

    T. Hayata and Y. Hidaka, q deformed formulation of hamiltonian su (3) yang-mills theory, Journal of High En- ergy Physics2023, 123 (2023). 8

    2023

  30. [30]

    C. Gils, S. Trebst, A. Kitaev, A. W. W. Ludwig, M. Troyer, and Z. Wang, Topology-driven quantum phase transitions in time-reversal-invariant anyonic quantum liquids, Nature Physics5, 834 (2009)

    2009

  31. [31]

    Hayata and Y

    T. Hayata and Y. Hidaka, Floquet evolution of the q- deformed su (3) 1 yang-mills theory on a two-leg ladder, Physical Review D111, 034513 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, T

    D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, T. V. Zache, J. Carrasco, B. Kraus, and P. Zoller, Hardware efficient quantum simulation of non-abelian gauge theories with qudits on rydberg plat- forms, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 160501 (2022)

    2022

  33. [33]

    T. V. Zache, D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, and P. Zoller, Fermion-qudit quantum processors for simulating lattice gauge theories with matter, Quantum7, 1140 (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    P. P. Popov, M. Meth, M. Lewestein, P. Hauke, M. Ring- bauer, E. Zohar, and V. Kasper, Variational quantum simulation of u(1) lattice gauge theories with qudit sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013202 (2024)

    2024

  35. [35]

    Calaj´ o, G

    G. Calaj´ o, G. Magnifico, C. Edmunds, M. Ringbauer, S. Montangero, and P. Silvi, Digital quantum simulation of a (1+1)d su(2) lattice gauge theory with ion qudits, PRX Quantum5, 040309 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    D. M. K¨ urk¸ c¨ uoglu, H. Lamm, and A. Maestri, Qudit gate decomposition dependence for lattice gauge theories (2024), arXiv:2410.16414 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Ballini, J

    E. Ballini, J. Mildenberger, M. M. Wauters, and P. Hauke, Symmetry verification for noisy quantum sim- ulations of non-Abelian lattice gauge theories, Quantum 9, 1802 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    E. Gaz, P. P. Popov, G. Pardo, M. Lewenstein, P. Hauke, and E. Zohar, Quantum simulation of non-abelian lattice gauge theories: A variational approach to 8 with dynam- ical matter, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033012 (2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    Jiang, N

    J. Jiang, N. Klco, and O. D. Matteo, Non-abelian dynam- ics on a cube: improving quantum compilation through qudit-based simulations (2025), arXiv:2506.10945 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Joshi, M

    R. Joshi, M. Meth, J. C. Louw, J. J. Osborne, K. Mato, M. Ringbauer, and J. C. Halimeh, Efficient qudit circuit for quench dynamics of 2 + 1d quantum link electrody- namics (2025), arXiv:2507.12589 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Joshi, J

    R. Joshi, J. C. Louw, M. Meth, J. J. Osborne, K. Mato, G.-X. Su, M. Ringbauer, and J. C. Halimeh, Probing hadron scattering in lattice gauge theories on qudit quan- tum computers (2025), arXiv:2507.12614 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    P. P. Popov, E. Ballini, A. Bottarelli, M. Burrello, P. Silvi, M. M. Wauters, and P. Hauke, When the cen- ter matters: color screening and gluelumps in dihedral lattice gauge theories (2025), arXiv:2512.00152 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    N. Klco, M. J. Savage, and J. R. Stryker, Su(2) non- abelian gauge field theory in one dimension on digital quantum computers, Phys. Rev. D101, 074512 (2020)

    2020

  44. [44]

    A Rahman, R

    S. A Rahman, R. Lewis, E. Mendicelli, and S. Powell, Self-mitigating trotter circuits for su(2) lattice gauge the- ory on a quantum computer, Phys. Rev. D106, 074502 (2022)

    2022

  45. [45]

    Hayata, Y

    T. Hayata, Y. Hidaka, and Y. Kikuchi, Onset of ther- malization of q-deformed su(2) yang-mills theory on a trapped-ion quantum computer (2026), arXiv:2601.13530 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    Thermalization of SU(2) Lattice Gauge Fields on Quantum Computers

    J.-W. Chen, Y.-T. Chen, G. Meher, B. M¨ uller, A. Sch¨ afer, and X. Yao, Thermalization of su(2) lattice gauge fields on quantum computers (2026), arXiv:2603.23948 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    Schindler, D

    P. Schindler, D. Nigg, T. Monz, J. T. Barreiro, E. Mar- tinez, S. X. Wang, S. Quint, M. F. Brandl, V. Nebendahl, C. F. Roos, M. Chwalla, M. Hennrich, and R. Blatt, A quantum information processor with trapped ions, New Journal of Physics15, 123012 (2013)

    2013

  48. [48]

    P. A. Barton, C. J. S. Donald, D. M. Lucas, D. A. Stevens, A. M. Steane, and D. N. Stacey, Measurement of the lifetime of the 3d 2D5/2 state in 40ca+, Phys. Rev. A62, 032503 (2000)

    2000

  49. [49]

    Sørensen and K

    A. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Quantum computation with ions in thermal motion, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 1971 (1999)

    1971

  50. [50]

    S. S. Bullock and I. L. Markov, Smaller circuits for arbitrary n-qubit diagonal computations (2003), arXiv:quant-ph/0303039 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2003

  51. [51]

    point-splitting

    A. M. Krol and Z. Al-Ars, Beyond quantum shannon: Circuit construction for general n-qubit gates based on block zxz-decomposition (2024), arXiv:2403.13692 [quant-ph]. 9 APPENDICES Appendix A: Experimental setup Experiments were performed on linear chains of three 40Ca+ ions confined in a macroscopic linear Paul trap. The ions are prepared close to the mot...

    work page arXiv 2024