arxiv: 2605.07030 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 💻 cs.CE · physics.app-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Scalable Active Metamaterials for Shape-Morphing

Jipeng Cui , Wei "Wayne" Chen

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 01:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CE physics.app-ph

keywords shape-morphing metamaterialsactive metamaterialshierarchical designaperiodic structuresprogrammable materialscomputational designsoft roboticsreconfigurable structures

0 comments

The pith

Hierarchical decoupling of scales enables scalable design of aperiodic shape-morphing metamaterials.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Shape-morphing metamaterials promise adaptive structures for soft robotics and medical devices, yet aperiodic versions that achieve rich deformations have resisted scalable design due to exploding computational cost. The paper establishes that stiff structural members can isolate local units so their deformations remain independent. This independence lets the design split into a macroscale problem of optimizing global shape via iterative constrained mesh solving and a microscale problem of filling local geometry through diffusion models or search. The split produces fast, accurate results for complex programmable materials that periodic designs cannot match.

Core claim

The SAM design framework decouples the design problem into two scales by exploiting the local deformation independence of units isolated by stiff structural members. At the macroscale, global shape deformation is determined by iteratively solving a constrained mesh optimization problem incorporating data-driven constraints. At the microscale, the local infill geometry is obtained through inverse design via either a conditional diffusion model or an adjustable search strategy. This hierarchical decomposition enables fast, accurate, and scalable design of aperiodic shape-morphing metamaterials.

What carries the argument

The hierarchical decomposition that exploits local deformation independence of units isolated by stiff structural members to separate global shape optimization from local infill design.

If this is right

Aperiodic metamaterial designs become computationally tractable at larger sizes and with richer deformation spaces.
Global shape targets can be met accurately through repeated constrained mesh optimization at the macro level.
Local infill patterns can be generated rapidly using learned models or direct search at the micro level.
Programmable material systems gain a practical route to complex, non-periodic behaviors for adaptive structures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same isolation principle could guide scalable design in other multi-scale engineering problems such as lattice structures or compliant mechanisms.
Combining the framework with real-time sensing might allow metamaterials that adjust their shape on the fly.
Physical fabrication experiments would directly test whether the independence holds under manufacturing variations and material nonlinearities.

Load-bearing premise

Local units isolated by stiff structural members deform independently without meaningful coupling to neighboring units.

What would settle it

A finite-element simulation or physical test of a multi-unit prototype in which neighboring units exhibit deformation coupling that exceeds the independence threshold assumed by the model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.07030 by Jipeng Cui, Wei "Wayne" Chen.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Computational efficiency and accuracy of the SAM framework evaluated on a curved-beam shape [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Gallery of shape-morphing design examples generated by the proposed framework. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Analysis of design error sources. Dissimilarity score is measured at the unit-cell level as the absolute error between a cell and its closest counterpart in the dataset after coordinate alignment. Edge length deviation denotes the departure of each mesh edge length from its initial value of 0.5 mm. Both quantities are computed from the deformed mesh solved by ConMLE. a,b. Dissimilarity score and edge lengt… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Volume change analysis of structures designed using the SAM framework. a–c [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Shape-morphing metamaterials enable adaptive structures capable of complex functional deformations, with applications ranging from reconfigurable structures and soft robotics to medical devices. However, their design remains challenging due to an inherent trade-off between deformation programmability and computational scalability. Periodic architectures offer computational tractability but are limited in their programmability, whereas aperiodic metamaterials provide richer deformation spaces at the cost of substantially increased design complexity. To bridge this gap, we propose a scalable active metamaterial (SAM) design framework that decouples the design problem into two scales by exploiting the local deformation independence of units isolated by stiff structural members. At the macroscale, global shape deformation is determined by iteratively solving a constrained mesh optimization problem incorporating data-driven constraints. At the microscale, the local infill geometry is obtained through inverse design via either a conditional diffusion model or an adjustable search strategy. This hierarchical decomposition enables fast, accurate, and scalable design of aperiodic shape-morphing metamaterials, offering a new computational paradigm for the design of programmable material systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper's main move is a two-scale split for aperiodic metamaterials that uses stiff members to isolate units, letting macro mesh optimization run separately from micro diffusion-based infill, but the independence claim is the part that needs real checking.

read the letter

The new piece is the explicit decoupling: constrained mesh optimization at the macro level to set global shape, then conditional diffusion or search at the micro level for unit infill, all justified by stiff structural members that supposedly keep local deformations independent. That synthesis looks fresh enough for the subfield and directly targets the periodic-versus-aperiodic scalability trade-off that has been a known limit. If the isolation holds, the approach could cut design time while keeping richer deformation spaces than periodic lattices allow. The abstract is clear on the workflow and the motivation, which is a plus for readability. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress test flags. The framework stands or falls on whether stiff members truly prevent non-negligible coupling between neighboring units under realistic loads; shared edges can transmit moments or global equilibrium can propagate effects, and nothing in the given description shows error metrics, finite-element checks, or load-case sweeps that would confirm the separation stays clean. Without those, the accuracy and scalability claims stay provisional. This is for researchers working on programmable materials, soft robotics, or inverse design tools who already know the periodic/aperiodic tension. It deserves a serious referee because the hierarchical idea is concrete and the problem is real, even if the current write-up leaves the central mechanical assumption untested. I would send it out for review with a note to the authors to add direct validation of the independence assumption.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a scalable active metamaterial (SAM) framework for designing aperiodic shape-morphing structures. It decouples the problem into macro-scale global deformation via iterative constrained mesh optimization incorporating data-driven constraints, and micro-scale local infill via conditional diffusion models or adjustable search, exploiting stiff structural members to isolate units and enable independent design at each scale.

Significance. If the decoupling holds with sufficient accuracy, the approach offers a practical computational paradigm bridging periodic tractability and aperiodic programmability, with potential for reconfigurable structures and soft robotics. The use of external solvers and pre-trained models supports scalability and reproducibility where code or models are shared.

major comments (2)

[Hierarchical decomposition / §3] The load-bearing assumption that stiff structural members enforce local deformation independence (justifying scale separation) requires quantitative validation; without bounds on residual coupling from boundary tractions or shared edges under representative load cases, the accuracy of macro-scale predictions and the overall scalability claim cannot be assessed.
[Abstract and Results] The abstract and framework claim 'fast, accurate' design but the provided description supplies no error metrics, convergence rates, or comparison baselines against fully coupled optimization; specific results (e.g., deformation error vs. ground truth or runtime scaling) are needed to support the central claims.

minor comments (2)

[Method] Notation for the constrained mesh optimization and diffusion conditioning should be defined explicitly with equations to clarify how data-driven constraints are incorporated.
[Figures] Figure captions and legends need to specify units, error bars, and exact parameter settings for any reported timings or accuracy values.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and describe the revisions we will make to strengthen the work.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Hierarchical decomposition / §3] The load-bearing assumption that stiff structural members enforce local deformation independence (justifying scale separation) requires quantitative validation; without bounds on residual coupling from boundary tractions or shared edges under representative load cases, the accuracy of macro-scale predictions and the overall scalability claim cannot be assessed.

Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative validation of the local deformation independence is required to fully support the hierarchical decomposition and scalability claims. Section 3 of the manuscript motivates the use of stiff structural members to isolate units and provides the design rationale, but we acknowledge that bounds on residual coupling are not quantified. In the revised manuscript we will add a new analysis subsection containing finite-element simulations of representative load cases (tension, bending, torsion, and shear) that measure deformation deviation at unit boundaries as a function of member stiffness ratio. These results will report explicit error bounds (e.g., maximum residual strain coupling) and demonstrate that coupling remains negligible within the operating regimes of our examples, thereby justifying the scale separation. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract and Results] The abstract and framework claim 'fast, accurate' design but the provided description supplies no error metrics, convergence rates, or comparison baselines against fully coupled optimization; specific results (e.g., deformation error vs. ground truth or runtime scaling) are needed to support the central claims.

Authors: We appreciate the referee’s observation that the abstract and framework description would be strengthened by concrete quantitative metrics. The current manuscript focuses on presenting the overall SAM framework and its conceptual advantages; however, we agree that direct evidence is needed. The revised manuscript will expand the Results section to include: (i) deformation error metrics (L2 nodal displacement error) relative to fully coupled ground-truth simulations across multiple test geometries, (ii) convergence rates of the iterative macro-scale constrained optimizer, and (iii) runtime scaling plots versus number of units, with direct comparison to a monolithic coupled optimization baseline. These additions will furnish the specific numbers and baselines required to substantiate the “fast, accurate” claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: hierarchical decoupling rests on physical assumption and external solvers/models

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a computational framework that decouples macro-scale mesh optimization from micro-scale infill design by invoking the physical premise that stiff structural members enforce local deformation independence. This premise is not derived from the paper's own outputs or equations but is presented as a design choice enabling the separation. Macro-scale solves a constrained optimization problem using data-driven constraints, while micro-scale employs either a pre-trained conditional diffusion model or an adjustable search strategy—both external to the current derivation. No equations reduce to fitted parameters renamed as predictions, no self-citation chains justify uniqueness theorems, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior author work. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and does not collapse to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption of local deformation independence; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Local deformation independence of units isolated by stiff structural members
Invoked to enable the two-scale decoupling of the design problem.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5478 in / 1158 out tokens · 48407 ms · 2026-05-11T01:38:18.836431+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Rogers, and Xiaoyue Ni

Yun Bai, Heling Wang, Yeguang Xue, Yuxin Pan, Jin-Tae Kim, Xinchen Ni, Tzu-Li Liu, Yiyuan Yang, Mengdi Han, Yonggang Huang, John A. Rogers, and Xiaoyue Ni. A dynamically reprogrammable surface with self-evolving shape morphing.Nature, 609(7928):701–708, September 2022

work page 2022
[2]

A. S. Meeussen and M. van Hecke. Multistable sheets with rewritable patterns for switchable shape-morphing. Nature, 621(7979):516–520, September 2023

work page 2023
[3]

Bio-inspired pneumatic shape-morphing elastomers.Nature Materials, 18(1):24–28, January 2019

Emmanuel Siéfert, Etienne Reyssat, José Bico, and Benoît Roman. Bio-inspired pneumatic shape-morphing elastomers.Nature Materials, 18(1):24–28, January 2019

work page 2019
[4]

Performance metrics for shape-morphing devices.Nature Reviews Materials, 9(10):738–751, October 2024

Jue Wang and Alex Chortos. Performance metrics for shape-morphing devices.Nature Reviews Materials, 9(10):738–751, October 2024

work page 2024
[5]

Portela, Dennis M

Xiaoxing Xia, Arman Afshar, Heng Yang, Carlos M. Portela, Dennis M. Kochmann, Claudio V . Di Leo, and Julia R. Greer. Electrochemically reconfigurable architected materials.Nature, 573(7773):205–213, September 2019

work page 2019
[6]

Karacakol, Seyda N

Yunus Alapan, Alp C. Karacakol, Seyda N. Guzelhan, Irem Isik, and Metin Sitti. Reprogrammable shape morphing of magnetic soft machines.Science Advances, 6(38):eabc6414, September 2020

work page 2020
[7]

Parada, Shengduo Liu, and Xuanhe Zhao

Yoonho Kim, German A. Parada, Shengduo Liu, and Xuanhe Zhao. Ferromagnetic soft continuum robots.Science Robotics, 4(33):eaax7329, August 2019

work page 2019
[8]

Mechanical cloak via data- driven aperiodic metamaterial design.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(13):e2122185119, 2022

Liwei Wang, Jagannadh Boddapati, Ke Liu, Ping Zhu, Chiara Daraio, and Wei Chen. Mechanical cloak via data- driven aperiodic metamaterial design.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(13):e2122185119, 2022

work page 2022
[9]

A novel auxetic unit cell for 3D metamaterials of designated negative Poisson’s ratio.International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 260:108614, 2023

Jipeng Cui, Liangchi Zhang, and Asit Kumar Gain. A novel auxetic unit cell for 3D metamaterials of designated negative Poisson’s ratio.International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 260:108614, 2023

work page 2023
[10]

Dudek, Muamer Kadic, Corentin Coulais, and Katia Bertoldi

Krzysztof K. Dudek, Muamer Kadic, Corentin Coulais, and Katia Bertoldi. Shape-morphing metamaterials. Nature Reviews Materials, 10(10):783–798, 2025

work page 2025
[11]

Deep Learning-Accelerated Designs of Tunable Magneto-Mechanical Metamaterials.ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 14(29):33892–33902, July 2022

Chunping Ma, Yilong Chang, Shuai Wu, and Ruike Renee Zhao. Deep Learning-Accelerated Designs of Tunable Magneto-Mechanical Metamaterials.ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 14(29):33892–33902, July 2022

work page 2022
[12]

The toughness of mechanical metamaterials.Nature Materials, 21(3):297–304, 2022

Angkur Jyoti Dipanka Shaikeea, Huachen Cui, Mark O’Masta, Xiaoyu Rayne Zheng, and Vikram Sudhir Deshpande. The toughness of mechanical metamaterials.Nature Materials, 21(3):297–304, 2022

work page 2022
[13]

Designing Shape Morphing Behavior through Local Programming of Mechanical Metamaterials.Advanced Materials, 33(37):2008617, 2021

Franziska Wenz, Ingo Schmidt, Alexander Leichner, Tobias Lichti, Sascha Baumann, Heiko Andrae, and Christoph Eberl. Designing Shape Morphing Behavior through Local Programming of Mechanical Metamaterials.Advanced Materials, 33(37):2008617, 2021

work page 2021
[14]

Programmable Auxeticity in Hydrogel Metamateri- als via Shape-Morphing Unit Cells.Advanced Science, 9(23):2201867, 2022

Oliver Skarsetz, Viacheslav Slesarenko, and Andreas Walther. Programmable Auxeticity in Hydrogel Metamateri- als via Shape-Morphing Unit Cells.Advanced Science, 9(23):2201867, 2022

work page 2022
[15]

Greenwood, Brian Elder, Md

Taylor E. Greenwood, Brian Elder, Md. Nahid Hasan, Jared Anklam, Saebom Lee, Jian Teng, Pai Wang, and Yong Lin Kong. Soft multistable magnetic-responsive metamaterials.Science Advances, 11(29):eadu3749, 2025

work page 2025
[16]

Encoding reprogrammable properties into magneto-mechanical materials via topology optimization.npj Computational Materials, 9(1):57, 2023

Zhi Zhao and Xiaojia Shelly Zhang. Encoding reprogrammable properties into magneto-mechanical materials via topology optimization.npj Computational Materials, 9(1):57, 2023

work page 2023
[17]

Data-Driven Design for Metamaterials and Multiscale Systems: A Review.Advanced Materials, 36(8):2305254, 2024

Doksoo Lee, Wei Wayne Chen, Liwei Wang, Yu-Chin Chan, and Wei Chen. Data-Driven Design for Metamaterials and Multiscale Systems: A Review.Advanced Materials, 36(8):2305254, 2024

work page 2024
[18]

Disordered mechanical metamaterials.Nature Reviews

Michael Zaiser and Stefano Zapperi. Disordered mechanical metamaterials.Nature Reviews. Physics, 5(11):679– 688, 2023

work page 2023
[19]

Automatic design of mechanical metamaterial actuators.Nature Communications, 11(1):4162, 2020

Silvia Bonfanti, Roberto Guerra, Francesc Font-Clos, Daniel Rayneau-Kirkhope, and Stefano Zapperi. Automatic design of mechanical metamaterial actuators.Nature Communications, 11(1):4162, 2020

work page 2020
[20]

Jiyoung Jung, Ailin Chen, and Grace X. Gu. Aperiodicity is all you need: Aperiodic monotiles for high- performance composites.Materials Today, 73:1–8, 2024

work page 2024
[21]

Mechan- ical characterisation of novel aperiodic lattice structures.Materials & Design, 229:111922, 2023

Chikwesiri Imediegwu, Daniel Clarke, Francesca Carter, Uwe Grimm, Iestyn Jowers, and Richard Moat. Mechan- ical characterisation of novel aperiodic lattice structures.Materials & Design, 229:111922, 2023

work page 2023
[22]

Growth rules for irregular architected materials with programmable properties.Science, 377:975–981, 2022

Ke Liu, Rachel Sun, and Chiara Daraio. Growth rules for irregular architected materials with programmable properties.Science, 377:975–981, 2022

work page 2022
[23]

Combinatorial design of textured mechanical metamaterials.Nature, 535(7613):529–532, 2016

Corentin Coulais, Eial Teomy, Koen de Reus, Yair Shokef, and Martin van Hecke. Combinatorial design of textured mechanical metamaterials.Nature, 535(7613):529–532, 2016. 15

work page 2016
[24]

Deep generative modeling for mechanistic-based learning and design of metamaterial systems.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 372:113377, 2020

Liwei Wang, Yu-Chin Chan, Faez Ahmed, Zhao Liu, Ping Zhu, and Wei Chen. Deep generative modeling for mechanistic-based learning and design of metamaterial systems.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 372:113377, 2020

work page 2020
[25]

IH-GAN: A conditional generative model for implicit surface-based inverse design of cellular structures.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 396:115060, 2022

Jun Wang, Wei (Wayne) Chen, Daicong Da, Mark Fuge, and Rahul Rai. IH-GAN: A conditional generative model for implicit surface-based inverse design of cellular structures.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 396:115060, 2022

work page 2022
[26]

K. Lu. Making strong nanomaterials ductile with gradients.Science, 345(6203):1455–1456, September 2014

work page 2014
[27]

Planar gradient metamaterials.Nature Reviews Materials, 1(12):16067, October 2016

Yadong Xu, Yangyang Fu, and Huanyang Chen. Planar gradient metamaterials.Nature Reviews Materials, 1(12):16067, October 2016

work page 2016
[28]

Yanbin Li, Caizhi Zhou, and Jie Yin. Geometric mechanics of kiri-origami-based bifurcated mechanical metama- terials.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 382(2283):20240010, 2024

work page 2024
[29]

Kamien, and Jie Yin

Yichao Tang, Gaojian Lin, Shu Yang, Yun Kyu Yi, Randall D. Kamien, and Jie Yin. Programmable Kiri-Kirigami Metamaterials.Advanced Materials, 29(10):1604262, 2017

work page 2017
[30]

Gary P. T. Choi, Levi H. Dudte, and L. Mahadevan. Programming shape using kirigami tessellations.Nature Materials, 18(9):999–1004, 2019

work page 2019
[31]

Computational design of 4D printed shape morphing lattices undergoing large deformation.Smart Materials and Structures, 33(11):115047, 2024

Andreas Walker and Kristina Shea. Computational design of 4D printed shape morphing lattices undergoing large deformation.Smart Materials and Structures, 33(11):115047, 2024

work page 2024
[32]

Evenchik, Jared M

Liwei Wang, Alexander L. Evenchik, Jared M. Yang, Ryan L. Truby, and Wei Chen. Autonomous codesign and fabrication of multistimuli-responsive material systems.Science Advances, 11(37):eadx4409, 2025

work page 2025
[33]

Physics-aware differentiable design of magnetically actuated kirigami for shape morphing.Nature Communications, 14(1):8516, 2023

Liwei Wang, Yilong Chang, Shuai Wu, Ruike Renee Zhao, and Wei Chen. Physics-aware differentiable design of magnetically actuated kirigami for shape morphing.Nature Communications, 14(1):8516, 2023

work page 2023
[34]

Electromagnetic (EM)-Driven Functional Materials.Advanced Materials, 38(11):e21268, 2026

Jay Sim, Lu Lu, and Ruike Renee Zhao. Electromagnetic (EM)-Driven Functional Materials.Advanced Materials, 38(11):e21268, 2026

work page 2026
[35]

Sorkine, D

O. Sorkine, D. Cohen-Or, Y . Lipman, M. Alexa, C. Rössl, and H.-P. Seidel. Laplacian surface editing. In Proceedings of the 2004 Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Geometry processing, SGP ’04, pages 175–184, New York, NY , USA, 2004. Association for Computing Machinery

work page 2004
[36]

Takeo Igarashi, Tomer Moscovich, and John F. Hughes. As-rigid-as-possible shape manipulation.ACM Transac- tions on Graphics, 24(3):1134–1141, 2005

work page 2005
[37]

Kollmann, Diab W

Hunter T. Kollmann, Diab W. Abueidda, Seid Koric, Erman Guleryuz, and Nahil A. Sobh. Deep learning for topology optimization of 2D metamaterials.Materials & Design, 196:109098, 2020

work page 2020
[38]

Designing complex architectured materials with generative adversarial networks.Science Advances, 6(17):eaaz4169, 2020

Yunwei Mao, Qi He, and Xuanhe Zhao. Designing complex architectured materials with generative adversarial networks.Science Advances, 6(17):eaaz4169, 2020

work page 2020
[39]

Kochmann

Jan-Hendrik Bastek and Dennis M. Kochmann. Inverse design of nonlinear mechanical metamaterials via video denoising diffusion models.Nature Machine Intelligence, 5(12):1466–1475, 2023

work page 2023
[40]

Kingma, Ben Poole, Mohammad Norouzi, David J

Jonathan Ho, William Chan, Chitwan Saharia, Jay Whang, Ruiqi Gao, Alexey Gritsenko, Diederik P. Kingma, Ben Poole, Mohammad Norouzi, David J. Fleet, and Tim Salimans. Imagen Video: High Definition Video Generation with Diffusion Models, 2022

work page 2022
[41]

Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models, 2020

Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models, 2020

work page 2020
[42]

Michael S. Selig. UIUC Airfoil Data Site, 1996

work page 1996
[43]

Wei Chen, Kevin Chiu, and Mark D. Fuge. Airfoil Design Parameterization and Optimization Using Bézier Generative Adversarial Networks.AIAA Journal, 58(11):4723–4735, 2020

work page 2020
[44]

Gmsh: A 3-D finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 79(11):1309–1331, 2009

Christophe Geuzaine and Jean-François Remacle. Gmsh: A 3-D finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 79(11):1309–1331, 2009

work page 2009
[45]

Alnæs, Anders Logg, Kristian B

Martin S. Alnæs, Anders Logg, Kristian B. Ølgaard, Marie E. Rognes, and Garth N. Wells. Unified form language: A domain-specific language for weak formulations of partial differential equations.ACM Trans. Math. Softw., 40(2):9:1–9:37, 2014

work page 2014
[46]

Scroggs, Jørgen S

Matthew W. Scroggs, Jørgen S. Dokken, Chris N. Richardson, and Garth N. Wells. Construction of Arbitrary Order Finite Element Degree-of-Freedom Maps on Polygonal and Polyhedral Cell Meshes.ACM Trans. Math. Softw., 48(2):18:1–18:23, 2022. 16

work page 2022
[47]

Baratta, Joseph P

Igor A. Baratta, Joseph P. Dean, Jørgen S. Dokken, Michal Habera, Jack S. Hale, Chris N. Richardson, Marie E. Rognes, Matthew W. Scroggs, Nathan Sime, and Garth N. Wells. DOLFINx: The next generation FEniCS problem solving environment, 2023

work page 2023
[48]

Gropp, Lois Curfman McInnes, and Barry F

Satish Balay, William D. Gropp, Lois Curfman McInnes, and Barry F. Smith. Efficient management of parallelism in object oriented numerical software libraries. In E. Arge, A. M. Bruaset, and H. P. Langtangen, editors,Modern Software Tools in Scientific Computing, pages 163–202. Birkhäuser Press, 1997

work page 1997
[49]

Adams, Steven Benson, Jed Brown, Peter Brune, Kris Buschelman, Emil M

Satish Balay, Shrirang Abhyankar, Mark F. Adams, Steven Benson, Jed Brown, Peter Brune, Kris Buschelman, Emil M. Constantinescu, Lisandro Dalcin, Alp Dener, Victor Eijkhout, Jacob Faibussowitsch, William D. Gropp, Václav Hapla, Tobin Isaac, Pierre Jolivet, Dmitry Karpeev, Dinesh Kaushik, Matthew G. Knepley, Fande Kong, Scott Kruger, Dave A. May, Lois Curf...

work page 2025
[50]

Adams, Steven Benson, Jed Brown, Peter Brune, Kris Buschelman, Emil Constantinescu, Lisandro Dalcin, Alp Dener, Victor Eijkhout, Jacob Faibussowitsch, William D

Satish Balay, Shrirang Abhyankar, Mark F. Adams, Steven Benson, Jed Brown, Peter Brune, Kris Buschelman, Emil Constantinescu, Lisandro Dalcin, Alp Dener, Victor Eijkhout, Jacob Faibussowitsch, William D. Gropp, Václav Hapla, Tobin Isaac, Pierre Jolivet, Dmitry Karpeev, Dinesh Kaushik, Matthew G. Knepley, Fande Kong, Scott Kruger, Dave A. May, Lois Curfman...

work page 2025
[51]

Dalcin, Rodrigo R

Lisandro D. Dalcin, Rodrigo R. Paz, Pablo A. Kler, and Alejandro Cosimo. Parallel distributed computing using python.Advances in Water Resources, 34(9):1124 – 1139, 2011

work page 2011
[52]

U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation

Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation, 2015. arXiv:1505.04597 [cs]. 17

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015