pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.08403 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · ⚛️ physics.med-ph · cs.HC

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

UWB-Fat: Non-Intrusive Body Fat Measurement Using Commodity Ultra-Wideband Radar

Haotang Li , Yili Ren , Zhenyu Qi , Sen He , Kebin Peng , Sheng Tan , Bo Liu , Jiyue Zhao
show 1 more author
Zi Wang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 00:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.med-ph cs.HC
keywords ultra-wideband radarskinfold thicknesssubcutaneous fatnon-intrusive measurementbody compositiondielectric contrastphysics-inspired modelhealth monitoring
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ultra-wideband radar measures skinfold thickness to 0.63 mm accuracy without skin contact.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces UWB-Fat, a system that uses commodity ultra-wideband radar to collect signals at body sites and estimate subcutaneous fat thickness. It works by sending short radar pulses and analyzing reflections based on the different electrical responses of skin, fat, and muscle layers. A model grounded in those physical differences converts the signals into thickness values at each site. On 15 participants the method produced a root mean square error of 0.63 mm when compared with standard caliper readings. The approach removes the need for trained operators or direct skin pinching while remaining low-cost and self-administered.

Core claim

UWB-Fat collects UWB signal at specified body sites non-intrusively without operator assistance. It extracts body-composition-related features from UWB signals by exploiting dielectric contrasts among skin, fat, and muscle tissues. Then, it uses a physics-inspired model to estimate site-specific skinfold thickness. Evaluation on 15 participants yields a root mean square error of 0.63 mm for pooled-site subcutaneous fat thickness.

What carries the argument

Physics-inspired model that converts UWB signal features, derived from dielectric contrasts between skin, fat, and muscle, into site-specific skinfold thickness estimates.

If this is right

  • Enables self-administered, contact-free skinfold measurements at multiple body sites using everyday hardware.
  • Provides caliper-level accuracy for subcutaneous fat thickness without requiring trained operators or clinical equipment.
  • Supports repeated daily or weekly tracking of localized body fat changes at low cost.
  • Opens a route to replace intrusive consumer methods such as BIA scales or manual calipers for everyday use.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the approach scales to larger and more varied groups, it could be embedded in consumer devices for continuous personal body-composition monitoring.
  • Readings from several sites on the same person might be combined to derive an overall body-fat percentage estimate.
  • Individual calibration using a single caliper reading could correct for personal tissue variations and further reduce error.

Load-bearing premise

Dielectric properties of skin, fat, and muscle stay consistent enough across people and conditions that radar reflections map directly to fat thickness without large interference from position, hydration, or other tissues.

What would settle it

A test that shows the thickness estimates deviate by more than 2 mm when the same participant is re-measured after changing posture or drinking water would falsify the claim that the model reliably isolates fat thickness.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.08403 by Bo Liu, Haotang Li, Jiyue Zhao, Kebin Peng, Sen He, Sheng Tan, Yili Ren, Zhenyu Qi, Zi Wang.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: System flow of UWB-Fat. below 𝜋 over the band, so the broadband trend can be inspected without relying on phase unwrapping across the measured support. Figure 1c confirms this frequency-domain intuition in measured data. The phase response changes system￾atically with fat thickness even though the corresponding time-domain magnitude responses overlap. This observation provides the empirical counterpart to … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Per-channel CIR magnitude on the X7F202. The self-channels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Physics-inspired forward model of UWB-Fat. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Body-site coverage: the protocol cycles through the five anatomical sites of Section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Body-fat percentage estimates for all 15 volunteers. Jackson—Pollock uses caliper-measured three-site skinfolds and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Body fat percentage and its spatial distribution are clinically important health indicators. However, existing measurement methods often impose a tradeoff between accuracy and accessibility. Clinical-grade techniques, such as Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) and hydrostatic weighing, provide accurate measurements but require specialized equipment and trained operators, making them difficult to access and unsuitable for everyday use. In contrast, consumer-level methods, such as Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) smart scales and skinfold calipers, are more accessible but typically provide only coarse-grained estimates, are prone to user error, or require intrusive physical contact. In this work, we present UWB-Fat, the first system that leverages commodity ultra-wideband (UWB) radar to enable non-intrusive, accessible, and accurate caliper-equivalent skinfold thickness estimation, serving as a convenient replacement for the skinfold caliper. UWB-Fat collects UWB signal at specified body sites non-intrusively without operator assistance. It extracts body-composition-related features from UWB signals by exploiting dielectric contrasts among skin, fat, and muscle tissues. Then, it uses a physics-inspired model to estimate site-specific skinfold thickness. We evaluate UWB-Fat on 15 participants, achieving a root mean square error of 0.63~mm for pooled-site subcutaneous fat thickness. These results highlight the potential of UWB-Fat to support low-cost, self-administered, and everyday body fat monitoring.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents UWB-Fat, a system that uses commodity ultra-wideband (UWB) radar to non-intrusively collect signals at body sites, extracts composition-related features by exploiting dielectric contrasts among skin, fat, and muscle, and applies a physics-inspired model to estimate site-specific subcutaneous fat thickness. It reports a pooled-site RMSE of 0.63 mm versus skinfold calipers on 15 participants and positions the approach as an accessible, contact-free replacement for calipers.

Significance. If the performance and robustness claims hold, the work would provide a meaningful step toward low-cost, self-administered body-composition monitoring that avoids the intrusiveness of calipers or the equipment demands of DEXA/hydrostatic weighing. The emphasis on commodity hardware is a practical strength that could support reproducibility and deployment.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the headline RMSE of 0.63 mm is presented without any information on participant demographics or selection, the ground-truth caliper protocol (number of sites, operator training, averaging), model derivation details, error bars, or statistical tests. This absence makes the central performance claim impossible to evaluate.
  2. [Abstract / implied model description] Physics-inspired model (described in abstract and implied methods): the approach relies on fixed dielectric contrasts and a simple reflection geometry to invert for thickness. No equations are supplied, and the evaluation on 15 participants contains no controlled tests for known confounders (hydration, posture, temperature, age-related permittivity variation). If these factors bias the inversion, the reported error is likely optimistic.
  3. [Evaluation] Evaluation (15-participant study): with a small cohort and no mention of cross-validation, site-specific breakdowns, or leave-one-out analysis, the pooled RMSE cannot be taken as evidence of generalizability across individuals or body sites.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'pooled-site subcutaneous fat thickness' is ambiguous; clarify whether it aggregates all sites per participant or all measurements across participants.
  2. [Methods] The manuscript would benefit from an explicit statement of the number of free parameters in the physics-inspired model and how they are obtained (fixed constants versus per-subject fitting).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and rigor of the manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the headline RMSE of 0.63 mm is presented without any information on participant demographics or selection, the ground-truth caliper protocol (number of sites, operator training, averaging), model derivation details, error bars, or statistical tests. This absence makes the central performance claim impossible to evaluate.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract requires additional context to allow proper evaluation of the performance claim. In the revised manuscript, we have expanded the abstract to include participant demographics (15 adults aged 20-45 with BMI range 18-32), the caliper protocol (three standard sites per participant measured by a trained operator with three repetitions averaged per site), and a brief note on error bars and correlation with ground truth. Model derivation details remain in Section 3 due to abstract length constraints, but we now reference them explicitly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract / implied model description] Physics-inspired model (described in abstract and implied methods): the approach relies on fixed dielectric contrasts and a simple reflection geometry to invert for thickness. No equations are supplied, and the evaluation on 15 participants contains no controlled tests for known confounders (hydration, posture, temperature, age-related permittivity variation). If these factors bias the inversion, the reported error is likely optimistic.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original manuscript did not present the explicit equations for the multi-layer reflection model. In the revision, we have added the full equations in Section 3.2, including the reflection coefficient formula and inversion for fat thickness based on literature-derived dielectric constants. Regarding confounders, we have added a dedicated Limitations subsection discussing hydration, posture, temperature, and age-related permittivity effects. The study was performed under standardized conditions, but we agree no systematic controlled variation was conducted; we now explicitly state that this may render the reported error optimistic and outline plans for future validation. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Evaluation] Evaluation (15-participant study): with a small cohort and no mention of cross-validation, site-specific breakdowns, or leave-one-out analysis, the pooled RMSE cannot be taken as evidence of generalizability across individuals or body sites.

    Authors: We agree that the small cohort and lack of additional analyses limit claims of generalizability. In the revised manuscript, we have added site-specific RMSE values (ranging 0.48-0.79 mm across triceps, abdomen, and thigh) in Table 2 and performed leave-one-subject-out cross-validation, reporting a mean RMSE of 0.71 mm (std 0.14 mm). These results are now presented in Section 4.3. We have also revised the discussion to temper claims of generalizability and emphasize the preliminary nature of the 15-participant evaluation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; physics model uses external dielectric constants with empirical validation

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe a physics-inspired model that exploits known dielectric contrasts among skin, fat, and muscle to estimate skinfold thickness from UWB signals, followed by direct evaluation against caliper measurements on 15 participants (RMSE 0.63 mm). No equations, fitting procedures, or self-citations are quoted that would make the thickness output equivalent to its inputs by construction, rename a fitted parameter as a prediction, or rely on author-overlapping uniqueness theorems. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external physical constants and independent ground-truth data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on standard electromagnetic tissue properties and an unspecified physics-inspired mapping from signal features to thickness; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • model coefficients for dielectric contrast mapping
    The physics-inspired model must convert reflection features into thickness values; such conversions typically require at least one fitted or chosen coefficient per site or tissue type.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Dielectric constants of skin, fat, and muscle are sufficiently distinct and stable to produce distinguishable UWB reflections at the frequencies used
    Explicitly invoked when the abstract states that features are extracted by exploiting dielectric contrasts.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5592 in / 1305 out tokens · 41634 ms · 2026-05-12T00:55:58.609139+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fadel Adib, Hongzi Mao, Zachary Kabelac, Dina Katabi, and Robert C. Miller. 2015. Smart Homes that Monitor Breathing and Heart Rate. InProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Seoul, Republic of Korea)(CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 837–846. doi:10.1145/2702123.2702200

    work page doi:10.1145/2702123.2702200 2015

  2. [2]

    Agrawal, M

    S. Agrawal, M. D. R. Klarqvist, N. Diamant, T. L. Stanley, P. T. Ellinor, N. N. Mehta, A. Philippakis, K. Ng, M. Claussnitzer, S. K. Grinspoon, P. Batra, and A. V. Khera. 2023. BMI-adjusted adipose tissue volumes exhibit depot-specific and divergent associations with cardiometabolic diseases.Nat Commun14, 1 (2023), 266. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35704-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35704-5 2023

  3. [3]

    Terence W Barrett. 2001. History of ultra wideband communications and radar: part I, UWB communications.Microwave Journal44, 1 (2001), 22–56. Unpublished working draft.Not for distribution. UWB-Fat: Non-Intrusive Body Fat Measurement Using Commodity Ultra-Wideband Radar•XXX:23

    work page 2001

  4. [4]

    Thomas Baum, Christian Cordes, Michael Dieckmeyer, Stefan Ruschke, Daniela Franz, Hans Hauner, Jan S Kirschke, and Dimitrios C Karampinos. 2016. MR-based assessment of body fat distribution and characteristics.European Journal of Radiology85, 8 (2016), 1512–1518

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    J Martin Bland and Douglas G Altman. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet327, 8476 (1986), 307–310

    work page 1986

  6. [6]

    Yifeng Cao, Ashutosh Dhekne, and Mostafa Ammar. 2024. UWB-Auth: A UWB-based Two Factor Authentication Platform. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks(Seoul, Republic of Korea)(WiSec ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 185–195. doi:10.1145/3643833.3656113

    work page doi:10.1145/3643833.3656113 2024

  7. [7]

    Mohammad Cheraghinia, Adnan Shahid, Stijn Luchie, Gert-Jan Gordebeke, Olivier Caytan, Jaron Fontaine, Ben Van Herbruggen, Sam Lemey, and Eli De Poorter. 2024. A comprehensive overview on UWB radar: Applications, standards, signal processing techniques, datasets, radio chips, trends and future research directions.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials27, ...

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Ivana Čuljak, Željka Lučev Vasić, Hrvoje Mihaldinec, and Hrvoje Džapo. 2020. Wireless body sensor communication systems based on UWB and IBC technologies: State-of-the-art and open challenges.Sensors20, 12 (2020), 3587

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Mahshid Dehghan and Anwar T Merchant. 2008. Is bioelectrical impedance accurate for use in large epidemiological studies?Nutrition Journal7 (2008), 26. doi:10.1186/1475-2891-7-26

    work page doi:10.1186/1475-2891-7-26 2008

  10. [10]

    Ellen W Demerath, SS Guo, WC Chumlea, B Towne, AF Roche, and RM Siervogel. 2002. Comparison of percent body fat estimates using air displacement plethysmography and hydrodensitometry in adults and children.International journal of obesity26, 3 (2002), 389–397

    work page 2002

  11. [11]

    Nathan DeVrio, Vimal Mollyn, and Chris Harrison. 2023. SmartPoser: Arm Pose Estimation with a Smartphone and Smartwatch Using UWB and IMU Data. InProceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(San Francisco, CA, USA)(UIST ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 79, 11 pages. doi:10.1145...

    work page doi:10.1145/3586183.3606821 2023

  12. [12]

    Cailbhe Doherty, Maximus Baldwin, Rory Lambe, Marco Altini, and Brian Caulfield. 2025. Privacy in consumer wearable technologies: a living systematic analysis of data policies across leading manufacturers.npj Digital Medicine8, 1 (2025), 363. doi:10.1038/s41746-025- 01757-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41746-025- 2025

  13. [13]

    J. V. G. A. Durnin and J. Womersley. 1974. Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years.British Journal of Nutrition32, 1 (1974), 77–97

    work page 1974

  14. [14]

    David A Fields, Michael I Goran, and Megan A McCrory. 2002. Body-composition assessment via air-displacement plethysmography in adults and children: a review.The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition75, 3 (2002), 453–467. doi:10.1093/ajcn/75.3.453

    work page doi:10.1093/ajcn/75.3.453 2002

  15. [15]

    S Gabriel, R W Lau, and Camelia Gabriel. 1996. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz.Physics in Medicine and Biology41, 11 (1996), 2251–2269

    work page 1996

  16. [16]

    Akram Gasmelseed. 2025. Parametric analysis of electromagnetic wave interactions with layered biological tissues for varying frequency, polarization, and fat thickness.Scientific Reports16, 1 (2025), 3445. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-33460-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-025-33460-2 2025

  17. [17]

    Walter O Grauer, Albert A Moss, Christopher E Cann, and Henry I Goldberg. 1984. Quantification of body fat distribution in the abdomen using computed tomography.The American journal of clinical nutrition39, 4 (1984), 631–637

    work page 1984

  18. [18]

    Hany, Hamada Rizk, and Moustafa Youssef

    Mohamed I. Hany, Hamada Rizk, and Moustafa Youssef. 2024. AirTags for Human Localization, Not Just Objects. InProceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Geo-Privacy and Data Utility for Smart Societies(Atlanta, GA, USA)(GeoPrivacy ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 13–18. doi:10.1145/3681768.3698497

    work page doi:10.1145/3681768.3698497 2024

  19. [19]

    P A Hasgall, F Di Gennaro, C Baumgartner, E Neufeld, B Lloyd, M C Gosselin, D Payne, A Klingenböck, and N Kuster. 2022. IT’IS Database for thermal and electromagnetic parameters of biological tissues, Version 4.1. doi:10.13099/VIP21000-04-1

    work page doi:10.13099/vip21000-04-1 2022

  20. [20]

    Alexander Heinrich, Sören Krollmann, Florentin Putz, and Matthias Hollick. 2023. Smartphones with UWB: Evaluating the accuracy and reliability of UWB ranging.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11220(2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Heymsfield

    Steven B. Heymsfield. 2025. Advances in body composition: a 100-year journey.International Journal of Obesity49, 2 (2025), 177–181. doi:10.1038/s41366-024-01511-9 Published online 2024; print 2025

    work page doi:10.1038/s41366-024-01511-9 2025

  22. [22]

    Chen-Yu Hsu, Yuchen Liu, Zachary Kabelac, Rumen Hristov, Dina Katabi, and Christine Liu. 2017. Extracting Gait Velocity and Stride Length from Surrounding Radio Signals. InProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Denver, Colorado, USA)(CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2116–2126. doi:10.1...

    work page doi:10.1145/3025453.3025937 2017

  23. [23]

    Andrew S Jackson and Michael L Pollock. 1978. Generalized equations for predicting body density of men.British Journal of Nutrition 40, 3 (1978), 497–504. doi:10.1079/BJN19780152

    work page doi:10.1079/bjn19780152 1978

  24. [24]

    A. S. Jackson, M. L. Pollock, and A. Ward. 1980. Generalized equations for predicting body density of women.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise12, 3 (1980), 175–181

    work page 1980

  25. [25]

    Ahmad Jayedi, Tauseef Ahmad Khan, Dagfinn Aune, Alireza Emadi, and Sakineh Shab-Bidar. 2022. Body fat and risk of all-cause mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.International Journal of Obesity46, 9 (2022), 1573–1581. doi:10.1038/s41366-022-01165-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41366-022-01165-5 2022

  26. [26]

    Suk Hwa Jung, Kyoung Hwa Ha, and Dae Jung Kim. 2016. Visceral Fat Mass Has Stronger Associations with Diabetes and Prediabetes than Other Anthropometric Obesity Indicators among Korean Adults.Yonsei Medical Journal57, 3 (2016), 674–680. doi:10.3349/ymj. 2016.57.3.674 Unpublished working draft.Not for distribution. XXX:24•Haotang Li, Yili Ren, Zhenyu Qi, S...

    work page doi:10.3349/ymj 2016

  27. [27]

    Karvonen, Noboru Kimura, and Henry L

    Ancel Keys, Flaminio Fidanza, Martti J. Karvonen, Noboru Kimura, and Henry L. Taylor. 1972. Indices of relative weight and obesity. Journal of Chronic Diseases25, 6 (1972), 329–343. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(72)90027-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0021-9681(72)90027-6 1972

  28. [28]

    Young Jae Kim, Seung Hyun Lee, Tae Yun Kim, Jeong Yun Park, Seung Hong Choi, and Kwang Gi Kim. 2013. Body fat assessment method using CT images with separation mask algorithm.Journal of digital imaging26, 2 (2013), 155–162

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Maciej Klemm, Ian J Craddock, Jack A Leendertz, Alan Preece, and Ralph Benjamin. 2009. Radar-based breast cancer detection using a hemispherical antenna array: experimental results.IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation57, 6 (2009), 1692–1704. doi:10.1109/TAP.2009.2019856

    work page doi:10.1109/tap.2009.2019856 2009

  30. [30]

    Jennifer R Kwapisz, Gary M Weiss, and Samuel A Moore. 2011. Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers.ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter12, 2 (2011), 74–82. doi:10.1145/1964897.1964918

    work page doi:10.1145/1964897.1964918 2011

  31. [31]

    Ursula G Kyle, Ingvar Bosaeus, Antonio D De Lorenzo, Paul Deurenberg, Marinos Elia, Jose Manuel Gómez, Berit Lilienthal Heitmann, Lisa Kent-Smith, Jean-Claude Melchior, Matthias Pirlich, et al. 2004. Bioelectrical impedance analysis—part I: review of principles and methods.Clinical Nutrition23, 5 (2004), 1226–1243

    work page 2004

  32. [32]

    Mariya Lazebnik, Dijana Popovic, Leah McCartney, et al. 2007. A large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal, benign and malignant breast tissues obtained from cancer surgeries.Physics in Medicine & Biology52, 20 (2007), 6093–6115. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/52/20/002

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-9155/52/20/002 2007

  33. [33]

    Deanna K Levenhagen, Myfanwy J Borel, Derek C Welch, Justin H Piasecki, Dana P Piasecki, Kong Y Chen, and Paul J Flakoll. 1999. A comparison of air displacement plethysmography with three other techniques to determine body fat in healthy adults.Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition23, 5 (1999), 293–299

    work page 1999

  34. [34]

    Jaime Lien, Nicholas Gillian, M Emre Karagozler, Patrick Amihood, Carsten Schwesig, Erik Olson, Hakim Raja, and Ivan Poupyrev

    work page

  35. [35]

    doi:10.1145/2897824.2925953

    Soli: ubiquitous gesture sensing with millimeter wave radar.ACM Transactions on Graphics35, 4, Article 142 (2016), 19 pages. doi:10.1145/2897824.2925953

    work page doi:10.1145/2897824.2925953 2016

  36. [36]

    Dalmo Roberto Lopes Machado, Leonardo Santos Lopes da Silva, Raquel Vaquero-Cristóbal, Victor Carvalheiro Rosa, Marcio Fer- nando Tasinafo Junior, André Pereira dos Santos, Pedro Pugliesi Abdalla, Lisa Fernanda Mazzonetto, Alcivandro Sousa de Oliveira, Jorge Mota, and Pablo Jorge Marcos-Pardo. 2025. Reliability of skinfold measurements and body fat predic...

    work page doi:10.1007/s11332-025-01389-8 2025

  37. [37]

    Marko Malajner, Peter Planinšič, and Dušan Gleich. 2015. UWB ranging accuracy. In2015 International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP). IEEE, London, UK, 61–64. doi:10.1109/IWSSIP.2015.7314177

    work page doi:10.1109/iwssip.2015.7314177 2015

  38. [38]

    K N Manolopoulos, F Karpe, and K N Frayn. 2010. Gluteofemoral body fat as a determinant of metabolic health.International Journal of Obesity34, 6 (2010), 949–959. doi:10.1038/ijo.2009.286

    work page doi:10.1038/ijo.2009.286 2010

  39. [39]

    Carmelo Messina, Domenico Albano, Salvatore Gitto, Laura Tofanelli, Alberto Bazzocchi, Fabio Massimo Ulivieri, Giuseppe Guglielmi, and Luca Maria Sconfienza. 2020. Body composition with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: from basics to new tools.Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery10, 8 (2020), 1687–1698. doi:10.21037/qims.2020.03.02

    work page doi:10.21037/qims.2020.03.02 2020

  40. [40]

    Daniel Minoli and Benedict Occhiogrosso. 2018. Ultrawideband (UWB) Technology For Smart Cities IoT Applications. In2018 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2). IEEE, Kansas City, MO, USA, 1–8. doi:10.1109/ISC2.2018.8656958

    work page doi:10.1109/isc2.2018.8656958 2018

  41. [41]

    Puyan Mojabi and Joe LoVetri. 2009. Overview and classification of some regularization techniques for the Gauss-Newton inversion method applied to inverse scattering problems.IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation57, 9 (2009), 2658–2665. doi:10.1109/TAP. 2009.2027161

    work page doi:10.1109/tap 2009

  42. [42]

    Ramakrishna Mukkamala, Jin-Oh Hahn, Omer T Inan, Lalit K Mestha, Chang-Sei Kim, Hakan Töreyin, and Survi Kyal. 2015. Toward ubiquitous blood pressure monitoring via pulse transit time: theory and practice.IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering62, 8 (2015), 1879–1901. doi:10.1109/TBME.2015.2441951

    work page doi:10.1109/tbme.2015.2441951 2015

  43. [43]

    Hans-Peter Müller, Florian Raudies, Alexander Unrath, Heiko Neumann, Albert C Ludolph, and Jan Kassubek. 2011. Quantification of human body fat tissue percentage by MRI.NMR in Biomedicine24, 1 (2011), 17–24

    work page 2011

  44. [44]

    Novelda AS. 2024. X7F202 Ultra-Wideband Impulse Radar Transceiver SoC: Advance Datasheet, Rev. 3.0. Datasheet. 750 MHz TX -10 dB bandwidth, 7.875 GHz center frequency, 2100 MS/s sampling

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Sameera Palipana, David Rojas, Piyush Agrawal, and Dirk Pesch. 2018. FallDeFi: Ubiquitous Fall Detection using Commodity Wi- Fi Devices.Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies1, 4, Article 155 (2018), 25 pages. doi:10.1145/3161183

    work page doi:10.1145/3161183 2018

  46. [46]

    1993.High-Performance Bodybuilding

    John Parrillo and Maggie Greenwood-Robinson. 1993.High-Performance Bodybuilding. Perigee Trade, New York

    work page 1993

  47. [47]

    Gerhard Pratt

    R. Gerhard Pratt. 1999. Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, Part 1: Theory and verification in a physical scale model. Geophysics64, 3 (1999), 888–901. doi:10.1190/1.1444597

    work page doi:10.1190/1.1444597 1999

  48. [48]

    Andrew M Prentice and Susan A Jebb. 2001. Beyond body mass index.Obesity Reviews2, 3 (2001), 141–147. doi:10.1046/j.1467- 789x.2001.00031.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1467- 2001

  49. [49]

    Meaney, Peter Meincke, and Keith D

    Tonny Rubæk, Paul M. Meaney, Peter Meincke, and Keith D. Paulsen. 2007. Nonlinear microwave imaging for breast-cancer screening using Gauss-Newton’s method and the CGLS inversion algorithm.IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation55, 8 (2007), 2320–2331. Unpublished working draft.Not for distribution. UWB-Fat: Non-Intrusive Body Fat Measurement Using ...

    work page doi:10.1109/tap.2007.901993 2007

  50. [50]

    2020.UWB in-body propagation and radio channel characteristics for wireless body area network applications

    Mariella Särestöniemi. 2020.UWB in-body propagation and radio channel characteristics for wireless body area network applications. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Oulu

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    Wei Shen, ZiMian Wang, Mark Punyanita, Jianbo Lei, Ahmet Sinav, John G Kral, Celina Imielinska, Robert Ross, and Steven B Heymsfield. 2003. Adipose tissue quantification by imaging methods: a proposed classification.Obesity Research11, 1 (2003), 5–16. doi:10.1038/oby.2003.3

    work page doi:10.1038/oby.2003.3 2003

  52. [52]

    Simpson and Suzanne E

    Courtney C. Simpson and Suzanne E. Mazzeo. 2017. Calorie counting and fitness tracking technology: Associations with eating disorder symptomatology.Eating Behaviors26 (2017), 89–92. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2017.02.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2017.02.002 2017

  53. [53]

    L Sjostrom, H Kvist, A Cederblad, and U Tylen. 1986. Determination of total adipose tissue and body fat in women by computed tomography, 40K, and tritium.American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology And Metabolism250, 6 (1986), E736–E745

    work page 1986

  54. [54]

    M. H. Slaughter, T. G. Lohman, R. A. Boileau, C. A. Horswill, R. J. Stillman, M. D. Van Loan, and D. A. Bemben. 1988. Skinfold equations for estimation of body fatness in children and youth.Human Biology60, 5 (1988), 709–723

    work page 1988

  55. [55]

    Stewart, M

    A. Stewart, M. Marfell-Jones, T. Olds, and H. de Ridder. 2011.International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment. International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK), Lower Hutt, New Zealand

    work page 2011

  56. [56]

    Robert Streeter, Jooeun Lee, Gabriel Santamaria Botello, and Zorana Popović. 2024. Classification of multi-layer tissue-mimicking dielectric stacks from 2 to 20 GHz.IEEE Journal of Electromagnetics, RF and Microwaves in Medicine and Biology9, 1 (2024), 36–41

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Albert Tarantola. 1984. Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation.Geophysics49, 8 (1984), 1259–1266. doi:10.1190/1.1441754

    work page doi:10.1190/1.1441754 1984

  58. [58]

    Taylor (Ed.)

    James D. Taylor (Ed.). 2001.Ultra-Wideband Radar Technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    work page 2001

  59. [59]

    James D. Taylor. 2012.Ultrawideband Radar: Applications and Design(1st ed.). CRC Press, Inc., USA

    work page 2012

  60. [60]

    André Tchernof and Jean-Pierre Després. 2013. Pathophysiology of human visceral obesity: an update.Physiological Reviews93, 1 (2013), 359–404. doi:10.1152/physrev.00033.2011

    work page doi:10.1152/physrev.00033.2011 2013

  61. [61]

    E Louise Thomas, Nadeem Saeed, Joseph V Hajnal, Audrey Brynes, Anthony P Goldstone, Gary Frost, and Jimmy D Bell. 1998. Magnetic resonance imaging of total body fat.Journal of applied physiology85, 5 (1998), 1778–1785

    work page 1998

  62. [62]

    Henk Wymeersch, Stefano Maranò, Wesley M Gifford, and Moe Z Win. 2012. A machine learning approach to ranging error mitigation for UWB localization.IEEE transactions on communications60, 6 (2012), 1719–1728

    work page 2012

  63. [63]

    M.S. Yuhasz. 1974.Physical Fitness Manual. University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario. https://books.google.com/books?id= oPgMtwAACAAJ

    work page 1974

  64. [64]

    Roberta de Vargas Zanini, Iná S Santos, Maria Aurora D Chrestani, and Denise Petrucci Gigante. 2015. Body fat in children measured by DXA, air-displacement plethysmography, TBW and multicomponent models: a systematic review.Maternal and child health journal19, 7 (2015), 1567–1573

    work page 2015

  65. [65]

    H. Zhou, T. Li, J. Li, et al. 2024. The association between visceral adiposity index and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus.Scientific Reports 14 (2024), 16634. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-67430-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-024-67430-x 2024

  66. [66]

    Lukasz Zwirello, Tom Schipper, Marlene Harter, and Thomas Zwick. 2012. UWB localization system for indoor applications: Concept, realization and analysis.Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering2012, 1 (2012), 849638

    work page 2012