pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.09444 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-10 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Non-factorisable electroweak virtual corrections to single-resonant processes

Fazila Ahmadova , Luca Buonocore , Massimiliano Grazzini , Chiara Savoini
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 04:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords electroweak correctionsnon-factorisablepole approximationtwo-loopsingle resonancesoft photonsdimensional regularisationfermion scattering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-factorisable electroweak corrections to single-resonant processes reduce to an iteration of the one-loop result at two loops after heavy-particle decoupling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines electroweak virtual corrections to 2-to-2 fermion scattering mediated by a single W or Z boson in the pole approximation. It separates the corrections into factorisable pieces, obtained from the vector-boson form factor, and non-factorisable pieces arising from soft-photon exchanges linking initial-state fermions, final-state fermions, and the resonance. An explicit two-loop calculation demonstrates that, once heavy degrees of freedom are removed, the non-factorisable terms equal the square of the one-loop result plus an extra piece generated by light-fermion loops. The identity holds exactly in dimensional regularisation and applies only when a single resonance is exchanged. The authors also outline how the pattern extends to all orders via soft-photon factorisation.

Core claim

Once the heavy degrees of freedom are properly decoupled, the non-factorisable electroweak virtual corrections at two loops can be expressed as an iteration of the one-loop result plus a new contribution due to light fermion loops; this final two-loop result holds exactly in dimensional regularisation and is peculiar to the exchange of a single resonance.

What carries the argument

The pole approximation that organises the corrections into factorisable and non-factorisable parts, with the latter driven by soft-photon exchanges between initial, final, and resonant fermions.

Load-bearing premise

The pole approximation remains valid and heavy degrees of freedom can be decoupled without changing the structure of the non-factorisable corrections.

What would settle it

An explicit three-loop computation of the non-factorisable corrections for a single-resonant process that fails to match the iterated one-loop form plus the corresponding light-fermion contributions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.09444 by Chiara Savoini, Fazila Ahmadova, Luca Buonocore, Massimiliano Grazzini.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Representative diagrams for the four classes of one-loop non-factorisable corrections: [i] initial-final, [ii] initial-resonance, [iii] resonance-final, [iv] resonance-resonance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Representative diagrams for the one-loop corrections to the resonance propagator. small parameter λ ∼ ΓV /mV , whose choice is justified by the fact that ΓV ≪ mV . In the power counting, only the leading terms in λ are retained. The loop integrals that arise in our case receive non-vanishing contributions from hard (k ∼ O(λ 0 )) and soft (k ∼ O(λ)) regions. † At the one-loop order, it is quite straightforw… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Classification of corrections at two-loop order: [i] two-loop correction to the on-shell production, [ii] two-loop correction to the on-shell decay, [iii] the one-loop correction to both the on-shell production and the decay, [iv] and [v] products of one-loop factorisable and one-loop non-factorisable corrections, [vi] and [vii] genuine two-loop non-factorisable corrections. In the computation of the two-l… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Example of two-loop diagrams involving a pair of virtual soft photons exchanged between the same initial- and final-state fermions. the integrand function with respect to l1 and l2, which leads to δ (2) if⊗if = 1 2 Z d d l1d d l2 (2π) 2d h δ [i](l1, l2) + δ [ii](l1, l2) + δ [i](l2, l1) + δ [ii](l2, l1) i = − 1 2 Z d d l1d d l2 (2π) 2d (4πµϵ 0 ) 4 (eief ) 2 (4pi · pf ) 2 KV l 2 1 l 2 2 (2l1 · pi + i0+)(2l1 … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Example of two-loop ir ⊗ rf diagrams where one soft photon is exchanged between resonance- and initial-state, and the other between resonance- and final-state particles. photon momentum regions and can therefore be neglected. The second diagram yields a leading contribution only in the double-soft region, i.e. where both loop momenta have a soft scaling l ∼ mV λ. In contrast, the first diagram receives con… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Non-factorisable corrections arising from a self-energy insertion on the soft-photon propagator. ab (cd) identifies the pair of edges to which the first (second) soft-photon loop is attached. The complete set of results is given by δ (2) if⊗i ′f ′ = −(4π) 4  1 − 1 2 δ i ′ i δ f ′ f  (σiei)(σi ′ei ′ )(σf ef )(σf ′ef ′ )(4˜pi · p˜f )(4˜pi ′ · p˜f ′ ) KV DD[{i, f}, {i ′ , f′ }, V ] (24) δ (2) if⊗i ′r = −(4π… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Example of two-loop diagrams involving a bosonic correction to the external fermion line, dressed with a soft photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Zγ-mixing and photon self-energy diagrams. fermion contribution at two-loop order (δ (2),ℓ ab⊗γγ) can be captured by substituting α0 with the d-dimensional effective (running) coupling α(l 2 ) ≡ α0  1 + α0 4π SϵA(ϵ) β0 ϵ  µ 2 0 −l 2 ϵ (43) in the one-loop non-factorisable integral α0 4π δ (1) ab ≡ Sϵµ 2ϵ 0 4π Z d d l (2π) d α0 δ (1)′ ab (l), (44) where δ (1)′ ab symbolically denotes the eikonal integra… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider electroweak (EW) virtual corrections to $2\to 2$ fermion scattering processes mediated by a vector boson $V$ ($V=W^\pm,Z$) in the pole approximation. As is well known, the computation can be organised into factorisable and non-factorisable contributions. The factorisable corrections can be computed by evaluating the (polarised) EW form factor of the vector boson at the relevant perturbative order. The non-factorisable corrections are instead driven by soft-photon exchanges between the initial- and final-state fermions and/or the resonance. We perform an explicit two-loop computation to show that, once the heavy degrees of freedom are properly decoupled, such non-factorisable corrections can be expressed as an iteration of the one-loop result, plus a new contribution due to (light) fermion loops. The final two-loop result, which can be expected on general grounds from soft-photon factorisation, is shown to hold exactly in dimensional regularisation and is peculiar to the exchange of a single resonance. We discuss its extension to all perturbative orders.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript performs an explicit two-loop calculation in dimensional regularization of non-factorisable electroweak virtual corrections to single-resonant 2→2 fermion scattering processes mediated by a vector boson V (W± or Z) in the pole approximation. It organises corrections into factorisable and non-factorisable pieces, demonstrates that after decoupling heavy degrees of freedom the non-factorisable corrections reduce to an iteration of the one-loop result plus a light-fermion-loop term, verifies that this holds exactly, and discusses an all-order extension based on soft-photon factorisation.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work provides a concrete simplification for higher-order EW corrections to resonant processes, confirming the expected soft-photon factorisation structure and reducing the computational burden for two-loop non-factorisable terms. This is useful for precision phenomenology at current and future colliders and opens a path toward all-order resummation of such corrections.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that the result 'is peculiar to the exchange of a single resonance' but does not briefly contrast this with multi-resonance cases; adding one sentence in the introduction would clarify the scope.
  2. Notation for the resonance V and the pole approximation is introduced without a reference to a standard review; citing one or two key papers on the pole approximation in the introduction would aid readers.
  3. Figure captions and table headings should explicitly state the perturbative order and the regularisation scheme used, to avoid any ambiguity when comparing to one-loop results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The referee's summary accurately captures the content, methods, and potential impact of our work on non-factorisable electroweak corrections in the pole approximation. No specific major comments were raised, so we have nothing further to address point by point. We are pleased that the utility for precision phenomenology and the path toward all-order resummation is recognized.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper derives its result via explicit two-loop diagram evaluation in the pole approximation, showing that non-factorisable corrections reduce to an iterated one-loop term plus a light-fermion loop contribution after heavy-mode decoupling. This is a direct perturbative computation verified to hold exactly in dimensional regularisation, not a reduction by the paper's own equations to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation. The organisation into factorisable and non-factorisable pieces follows standard methods without smuggling ansatze or renaming known results as new derivations; the central claim therefore remains self-contained and independent of its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on standard perturbative QFT techniques with no new free parameters, no invented entities, and only conventional background assumptions such as dimensional regularization and the validity of the pole approximation.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Dimensional regularization is used to regulate ultraviolet and infrared divergences
    Explicitly invoked when stating that the two-loop result holds exactly in dimensional regularisation.
  • domain assumption Pole approximation for the resonant propagator
    The processes are considered in the pole approximation as stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5490 in / 1488 out tokens · 63961 ms · 2026-05-12T04:23:40.044355+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    de Blas et al.,Physics Briefing Book: Input for the 2026 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics,arXiv:2511.03883

    J. de Blas et al.,Physics Briefing Book: Input for the 2026 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics,arXiv:2511.03883

    work page arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    A. Huss, J. Huston, S. Jones, M. Pellen, and R. R¨ ontsch,Les Houches 2023 – Physics at TeV Colliders: Report on the Standard Model Precision Wishlist,arXiv:2504.06689

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Melnikov and O

    K. Melnikov and O. I. Yakovlev,Top near threshold: Allα s corrections are trivial, Phys. Lett. B324 (1994) 217–223, [hep-ph/9302311]

    work page arXiv 1994

  4. [4]

    V. S. Fadin, V. A. Khoze, and A. D. Martin,How suppressed are the radiative interference effects in heavy instable particle production?, Phys. Lett. B320(1994) 141–144, [hep-ph/9309234]

    work page arXiv 1994

  5. [5]

    Denner and S

    A. Denner and S. Dittmaier,Electroweak Radiative Corrections for Collider Physics, Phys. Rept.864 (2020) 1–163, [arXiv:1912.06823]

    work page arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Dittmaier and C

    S. Dittmaier and C. Schwan,Non-factorizable photonic corrections to resonant production and decay of many unstable particles, Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016), no. 3 144, [arXiv:1511.01698]

    work page arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Wackeroth and W

    D. Wackeroth and W. Hollik,Electroweak radiative corrections to resonant charged gauge boson production, Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 6788–6818, [hep-ph/9606398]

    work page arXiv 1997

  8. [8]

    U. Baur, S. Keller, and D. Wackeroth,Electroweak radiative corrections toWboson production in hadronic collisions, Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 013002, [hep-ph/9807417]

    work page arXiv 1999

  9. [9]

    Beenakker, F

    W. Beenakker, F. A. Berends, and A. P. Chapovsky,Radiative corrections to pair production of unstable particles: results fore +e− →four fermions, Nucl. Phys. B548(1999) 3–59, [hep-ph/9811481]. 26

    work page arXiv 1999

  10. [10]

    Denner, S

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, M. Roth, and D. Wackeroth,Electroweak radiative corrections to e+e− →W W→4fermions in double pole approximation: The RACOONWW approach, Nucl. Phys. B 587(2000) 67–117, [hep-ph/0006307]

    work page arXiv 2000

  11. [11]

    Denner, S

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, M. Roth, and L. H. Wieders,Complete electroweakO(α)corrections to charged-currente +e− →4 fermion processes, Phys. Lett. B612(2005) 223–232, [hep-ph/0502063]. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 704, 667–668 (2011)]

    work page arXiv 2005

  12. [12]

    Denner, S

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, M. Roth, and L. H. Wieders,Electroweak corrections to charged-currente +e− → 4 fermion processes: Technical details and further results, Nucl. Phys. B724(2005) 247–294, [hep-ph/0505042]. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 854, 504–507 (2012)]

    work page arXiv 2005

  13. [13]

    Falgari, P

    P. Falgari, P. Mellor, and A. Signer,Production-decay interferences at NLO in QCD fort-channel single-top production, Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 054028, [arXiv:1007.0893]

    work page arXiv 2010

  14. [14]

    Falgari, F

    P. Falgari, F. Giannuzzi, P. Mellor, and A. Signer,Off-shell effects for t-channel and s-channel single-top production at NLO in QCD, Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 094013, [arXiv:1102.5267]

    work page arXiv 2011

  15. [15]

    Falgari, A

    P. Falgari, A. S. Papanastasiou, and A. Signer,Finite-width effects in unstable-particle production at hadron colliders, JHEP05(2013) 156, [arXiv:1303.5299]

    work page arXiv 2013

  16. [16]

    Billoni, S

    M. Billoni, S. Dittmaier, B. J¨ ager, and C. Speckner,Next-to-leading order electroweak corrections to pp→W +W − →4 leptons at the LHC in double-pole approximation, JHEP12(2013) 043, [arXiv:1310.1564]

    work page arXiv 2013

  17. [17]

    Denner, R

    A. Denner, R. Franken, C. Haitz, D. Lombardi, and G. Pelliccioli,Electroweak corrections to doubly polarised WZ scattering at the LHC, JHEP02(2026) 120, [arXiv:2510.26462]

    work page arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    Biedermann, M

    B. Biedermann, M. Billoni, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, L. Hofer, B. J¨ ager, and L. Salfelder, Next-to-leading-order electroweak corrections topp→W +W − →4 leptons at the LHC, JHEP06(2016) 065, [arXiv:1605.03419]

    work page arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    Denner and M

    A. Denner and M. Pellen,NLO electroweak corrections to off-shell top-antitop production with leptonic decays at the LHC, JHEP08(2016) 155, [arXiv:1607.05571]

    work page arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    Biedermann, A

    B. Biedermann, A. Denner, and M. Pellen,Large electroweak corrections to vector-boson scattering at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017), no. 26 261801, [arXiv:1611.02951]

    work page arXiv 2017

  21. [21]

    Denner and G

    A. Denner and G. Pelliccioli,NLO QCD corrections to off-shellt ¯tW + production at the LHC, JHEP11 (2020) 069, [arXiv:2007.12089]

    work page arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    Dittmaier, G

    S. Dittmaier, G. Knippen, and C. Schwan,Next-to-leading-order QCD and electroweak corrections to triple-W production with leptonic decays at the LHC, JHEP02(2020) 003, [arXiv:1912.04117]

    work page arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Dittmaier, A

    S. Dittmaier, A. Huss, and C. Schwinn,Dominant mixed QCD-electroweakO(α sα) corrections to Drell-Yan processes in the resonance region, Nucl. Phys. B904(2016) 216–252, [arXiv:1511.08016]

    work page arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    Buonocore, M

    L. Buonocore, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, C. Savoini, and F. Tramontano,Mixed QCD-EW corrections to pp→ℓν ℓ +Xat the LHC, Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 114012, [arXiv:2102.12539]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Dittmaier, A

    S. Dittmaier, A. Huss, and J. Schwarz,Mixed NNLO QCD-electroweak corrections to single-Z production in pole approximation: differential distributions and forward-backward asymmetry, JHEP05(2024) 170, [arXiv:2401.15682]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Dittmaier, A

    S. Dittmaier, A. Huss, and C. Schwinn,Mixed QCD-electroweakO(α sα)corrections to Drell-Yan processes in the resonance region: pole approximation and non-factorizable corrections, Nucl. Phys. B885 (2014) 318–372, [arXiv:1403.3216]. 27

    work page arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    Buonocore, M

    L. Buonocore, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, J. M. Lindert, and C. Savoini,Towards NNLO QCD predictions for off-shell top-quark pair production and decays, JHEP10(2025) 195, [arXiv:2507.11410]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Armadillo, S

    T. Armadillo, S. Devoto, M. Dradi, and A. Vicini,Towards the two-loop electroweak corrections to the Drell-Yan process: the infrared structure,arXiv:2511.20365

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    Freitas and E

    A. Freitas and E. J. Wallace,Fermionic Electroweak Two-Loop Corrections to Drell-Yan and Related Processes,arXiv:2512.15700

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    Asymptotic expansion of Feynman integrals near threshold

    M. Beneke and V. A. Smirnov,Asymptotic expansion of Feynman integrals near threshold, Nucl. Phys. B 522(1998) 321–344, [hep-ph/9711391]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

  31. [31]

    V. A. Smirnov,Applied asymptotic expansions in momenta and masses, Springer Tracts Mod. Phys.177 (2002) 1–262

    work page 2002

  32. [32]

    Generating Feynman Diagrams and Amplitudes with FeynArts 3

    T. Hahn,Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3, Comput. Phys. Commun.140 (2001) 418–431, [hep-ph/0012260]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  33. [33]

    Nogueira,Automatic Feynman Graph Generation, J

    P. Nogueira,Automatic Feynman Graph Generation, J. Comput. Phys.105(1993) 279–289

    work page 1993

  34. [34]

    Shtabovenko,New multiloop capabilities of FeynCalc 10, PoSLL2024(2024) 071, [arXiv:2407.01447]

    V. Shtabovenko,New multiloop capabilities of FeynCalc 10, PoSLL2024(2024) 071, [arXiv:2407.01447]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Beneke, A

    M. Beneke, A. P. Chapovsky, A. Signer, and G. Zanderighi,Effective theory approach to unstable particle production, Phys. Rev. Lett.93(2004) 011602, [hep-ph/0312331]

    work page arXiv 2004

  36. [36]

    Beneke, A

    M. Beneke, A. P. Chapovsky, A. Signer, and G. Zanderighi,Effective theory calculation of resonant high-energy scattering, Nucl. Phys. B686(2004) 205–247, [hep-ph/0401002]

    work page arXiv 2004

  37. [37]

    Beneke,Unstable-particle effective field theory, Nucl

    M. Beneke,Unstable-particle effective field theory, Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc.261-262(2015) 218–231, [arXiv:1501.07370]

    work page arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    Actis, M

    S. Actis, M. Beneke, P. Falgari, and C. Schwinn,Dominant NNLO corrections to four-fermion production near the W-pair production threshold, Nucl. Phys. B807(2009) 1–32, [arXiv:0807.0102]

    work page arXiv 2009

  39. [39]

    Dittmaier and M

    S. Dittmaier and M. Kr¨ amer,Electroweak radiative corrections to W boson production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 073007, [hep-ph/0109062]

    work page arXiv 2002

  40. [40]

    D. Y. Bardin and G. Passarino, The standard model in the making: Precision study of the electroweak interactions. 1999

    work page 1999

  41. [41]

    Steinhauser,Results and techniques of multiloop calculations, Phys

    M. Steinhauser,Results and techniques of multiloop calculations, Phys. Rept.364(2002) 247–357, [hep-ph/0201075]

    work page arXiv 2002

  42. [42]

    A. V. Bednyakov, B. A. Kniehl, A. F. Pikelner, and O. L. Veretin,On theb-quark running mass in QCD and the SM, Nucl. Phys. B916(2017) 463–483, [arXiv:1612.00660]

    work page arXiv 2017

  43. [43]

    Ferroglia, M

    A. Ferroglia, M. Neubert, B. D. Pecjak, and L. L. Yang,Two-loop divergences of massive scattering amplitudes in non-abelian gauge theories, JHEP11(2009) 062, [arXiv:0908.3676]

    work page arXiv 2009

  44. [44]

    Becher and M

    T. Becher and M. Neubert,Infrared singularities of QCD amplitudes with massive partons, Phys. Rev. D 79(2009) 125004, [arXiv:0904.1021]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 80, 109901 (2009)]

    work page arXiv 2009

  45. [45]

    On the Structure of Infrared Singularities of Gauge-Theory Amplitudes

    T. Becher and M. Neubert,On the Structure of Infrared Singularities of Gauge-Theory Amplitudes, JHEP 06(2009) 081, [arXiv:0903.1126]. [Erratum: JHEP 11, 024 (2013)]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  46. [46]

    Infrared singularities of scattering amplitudes in perturbative QCD

    T. Becher and M. Neubert,Infrared singularities of scattering amplitudes in perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.102(2009) 162001, [arXiv:0901.0722]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 111, 199905 (2013)]. 28

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  47. [47]

    D. R. Yennie, S. C. Frautschi, and H. Suura,The infrared divergence phenomena and high-energy processes, Annals Phys.13(1961) 379–452

    work page 1961

  48. [48]

    Catani, B

    S. Catani, B. R. Webber, and G. Marchesini,QCD coherent branching and semiinclusive processes at large x, Nucl. Phys. B349(1991) 635–654

    work page 1991

  49. [49]

    Curci, W

    G. Curci, W. Furmanski, and R. Petronzio,Evolution of Parton Densities Beyond Leading Order: The Nonsinglet Case, Nucl. Phys. B175(1980) 27–92

    work page 1980

  50. [50]

    Furmanski and R

    W. Furmanski and R. Petronzio,Singlet Parton Densities Beyond Leading Order, Phys. Lett. B97 (1980) 437–442

    work page 1980

  51. [51]

    R. A. Brandt, F. Neri, and M.-a. Sato,Renormalization of Loop Functions for All Loops, Phys. Rev. D 24(1981) 879

    work page 1981

  52. [52]

    G. P. Korchemsky and A. V. Radyushkin,Renormalization of the Wilson Loops Beyond the Leading Order, Nucl. Phys. B283(1987) 342–364

    work page 1987

  53. [53]

    Y. Ma, G. Sterman, and A. Venkata,Soft Photon Theorem in QCD with Massless Quarks, Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024), no. 9 091902, [arXiv:2311.06912]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Chen and A

    L. Chen and A. Freitas,GRIFFIN: A C++ library for electroweak radiative corrections in fermion scattering and decay processes, SciPost Phys. Codeb.2023(2023) 18, [arXiv:2211.16272]

    work page arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    Liu and Y.-Q

    X. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma,AMFlow: A Mathematica package for Feynman integrals computation via auxiliary mass flow, Comput. Phys. Commun.283(2023) 108565, [arXiv:2201.11669]. 29

    work page arXiv 2023