arxiv: 2605.10891 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Can We Distinguish the Source Region Location of Filament/Prominence Eruptions from the Sun-as-a-star Hα Spectrum?

Junyi Zhang , Yijun Hou , Xiaofeng Liu , Ting Li , Shihao Rao , Ye Qiu , HuiPing Jin , Yingjie Cai

show 2 more authors

Yangrui Chen Chuan Li

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 03:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR

keywords filament eruptionsprominence eruptionsH-alpha spectraSun-as-a-starsource regionstellar activitysolar observationseruption diagnostics

0 comments

The pith

Sun-as-a-star Hα spectra show distinct time-dependent features for filament eruptions depending on whether they start on the disk or limb and in active regions or quiet Sun.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compares integrated Hα spectra of the Sun during filament and prominence eruptions from different source locations to test whether the unresolved light carries location-specific signatures. Limb events produce blueshifted or redshifted emission from bright off-limb material, while on-disk events instead show blueshifted absorption from the dark filament itself. Front-side limb eruptions typically show line-center emission first, but far-side ones reverse the order. Active-region eruptions add intense flare-ribbon emission at line center, whereas quiet-Sun events more often show both-wing emission followed by central absorption as the prominence fades. These patterns supply a template for locating similar eruptions on other stars where only disk-integrated spectra are available.

Core claim

Limb filament/prominence eruptions produce blueshifted or redshifted Hα emission from the bright off-limb structures, whereas on-disk eruptions produce blueshifted absorption from the dark filament; front-side limb events show line-center emission before the wing shifts while far-side events reverse the sequence; active-region events display stronger flare-ribbon line-center emission than quiet-Sun events, and large-scale quiescent prominence eruptions often show both-wing emission followed by central absorption after the bright structure disappears. These location-dependent spectral traits in the Sun-as-a-star view therefore serve as diagnostics for inferring the source regions of stellarer

What carries the argument

The time-dependent Sun-as-a-star Hα spectral signatures that arise from the combination of viewing geometry (on-disk versus limb) and magnetic environment (active region versus quiet Sun) at the eruption site.

If this is right

Stellar filament eruptions observed only in integrated light can be classified as on-disk or limb and as active-region or quiet-Sun type.
Location information improves estimates of whether a stellar eruption will affect a close-in planet or produce detectable space-weather effects.
High-cadence Hα monitoring of stars can be interpreted with solar-derived templates rather than treated as featureless flares.
Future stellar surveys can separate the contribution of different source populations to the overall activity budget.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same spectral templates could be applied to other chromospheric lines to cross-check the location inference.
Overlapping eruptions on a star would likely blend the signatures and require statistical or multi-epoch analysis to disentangle.
If the method works, it supplies an observational route to test whether stellar eruptions preferentially occur in active regions or quiet areas, a question left open by imaging-limited data.

Load-bearing premise

The observed differences in the integrated Hα spectra are produced mainly by the eruption's source location and local magnetic setting rather than by eruption speed, projection effects, or other simultaneous activity that could create similar signals.

What would settle it

A single well-observed on-disk filament eruption that instead produces the blueshifted emission profile expected for limb events, or a limb eruption that shows only absorption without any wing emission.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10891 by Chuan Li, HuiPing Jin, Junyi Zhang, Shihao Rao, Ting Li, Xiaofeng Liu, Yangrui Chen, Ye Qiu, Yijun Hou, Yingjie Cai.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: CHASE imaging and spectral observations of the events occurred on 2024 Jul 29 (event 1, on-disk active region eruption) and 2024 Apr 13 (event 2, front-side limb active region eruption). (a1) The full-disk solar imaging of event 1 at the Hα line center. The yellow dashed region is the cropped source region as (b1). (b1) The source region of event 1. The green dashed region is the target region (TR). (c1) L… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: CHASE imaging and spectral observations of the event occurred on 2024 Jun 10 (event 3, far-side limb active region eruption). (a)-(e) The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: CHASE imaging and spectral observations of the events occurred on 2024 May 5 (event 4, on-disk active region eruption) and 2024 Apr 11 (event 5, on-disk quiet-Sun region eruption). (a1)-(e1) The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: CHASE imaging and spectral observations of the events occurred on 2025 Aug 20 (event 6, limb quiet-Sun region eruption) and 2025 Sep 30 (event 7, limb quiet-Sun region eruption). (a1)-(e1) The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Solar filament/prominence eruptions can significantly perturb geospace when originating from favorable source locations and directions. While stellar analogs have been recently reported, the disk locations and magnetic environments of their source regions remain spatially unresolved on other stars. To bridge this gap, we investigate the typical Sun-as-a-star H$\alpha$ temporal spectral characteristics of solar filament/prominence eruptions with different source region locations (on-disk vs. limb, active region vs. quiet-Sun region). It is revealed that limb eruptions are characterized by blueshifted/redshifted emission caused by the bright off-limb erupting structures, whereas on-disk eruptions may show blueshifted absorptions due to the dark erupting filaments. Among the limb eruptions, front-side limb eruptions usually display line center emission before the blueshifted/redshifted emission, while far-side limb eruptions show the opposite sequence. Moreover, the magnetic environment at source also shapes the spectral characteristics. On-disk filament eruptions from active region exhibit much more intense flare-ribbon-dominated line center emission features compared with those from quiet-Sun region. Limb active region eruptions often show single-wing emissions, whereas large-scale quiet-Sun region (quiescent) prominence eruptions frequently display expansion-induced emission in both wings followed by line center absorption due to the disappearance of bright prominence. These distinct Sun-as-a-star H$\alpha$ spectral characteristics, dependent on eruption location, provide a diagnostic basis for inferring source regions of stellar filament/prominence eruptions from spatially unresolved H$\alpha$ spectra.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper maps solar filament eruptions to distinct Sun-as-a-star Hα profile sequences by location and magnetic setting, giving a practical template for reading unresolved stellar spectra.

read the letter

The core takeaway is that limb eruptions tend to produce blueshifted or redshifted emission from the bright off-limb material, while on-disk ones more often show blueshifted absorption from the dark filament. Front-side limb events usually show line-center emission first, far-side ones the reverse. Active-region cases add stronger flare-ribbon emission at line center; quiet-Sun ones show broader wing emission from expansion followed by central absorption as the prominence fades. These patterns come from concrete time-sequence spectra of actual solar events, not from models or simulations. That classification is new in its systematic application to the integrated Hα view and directly addresses the stellar-observation problem stated in the abstract. The authors stay measured: they present the sequences as a diagnostic basis rather than a guaranteed classifier and note that speed, projection, and overlapping activity could complicate things. The examples line up internally with no obvious contradictions in the reported ordering. The main limitation is that the work rests on a modest number of well-chosen cases rather than a large statistical sample with error bars or success rates, so the robustness across all possible eruptions is still open. No equations or free parameters are involved; it is straightforward observational sorting. This is the kind of paper that belongs in a solar-stellar activity journal. Readers who already work on stellar prominences or exoplanet space weather will find the templates immediately usable for interpreting new spectra. It is grounded enough and addresses a clear gap, so it deserves a serious referee who can check the event selection and ask for any missing quantitative checks on how often the patterns hold.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper investigates Sun-as-a-star Hα temporal spectral characteristics of solar filament/prominence eruptions binned by source-region location (on-disk vs. limb) and magnetic environment (active region vs. quiet-Sun). It reports that limb eruptions produce blueshifted/redshifted emission from off-limb structures while on-disk eruptions produce blueshifted absorption from dark filaments; front-side limb events show line-center emission before wing shifts whereas far-side events show the reverse sequence; active-region on-disk events exhibit stronger flare-ribbon line-center emission than quiet-Sun events; and large-scale quiet-Sun limb prominences display bilateral wing emission followed by line-center absorption. These location-dependent patterns are presented as a diagnostic basis for inferring source regions of stellar filament eruptions from unresolved Hα spectra.

Significance. If the reported patterns prove general, the work supplies a concrete observational bridge between resolved solar events and spatially unresolved stellar spectra, enabling inference of eruption source locations on other stars. The strength is the direct use of existing solar data to illustrate geometry- and environment-dependent line-profile evolution without introducing new parameters or models.

major comments (1)

Abstract and main-text results: the claim that distinct characteristics 'are revealed' and 'provide a diagnostic basis' is not supported by any reported sample sizes, event counts per category, quantitative metrics (e.g., measured Doppler shifts or intensities with uncertainties), statistical tests, or exclusion criteria. This absence is load-bearing for the central diagnostic claim, as the distinctions remain qualitative case descriptions whose robustness cannot be assessed.

minor comments (1)

The title is phrased as a question while the abstract and conclusions assert a positive diagnostic capability; a minor rephrasing would better reflect the manuscript's actual scope and findings.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful review and for highlighting the need for greater quantitative support. We agree that the diagnostic claims would be strengthened by explicit event counts, selection criteria, and measured metrics, and we will revise the manuscript to incorporate these elements.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract and main-text results: the claim that distinct characteristics 'are revealed' and 'provide a diagnostic basis' is not supported by any reported sample sizes, event counts per category, quantitative metrics (e.g., measured Doppler shifts or intensities with uncertainties), statistical tests, or exclusion criteria. This absence is load-bearing for the central diagnostic claim, as the distinctions remain qualitative case descriptions whose robustness cannot be assessed.

Authors: We accept this assessment. The present manuscript relies on representative case studies to illustrate the location-dependent spectral patterns. In the revised version we will add: (1) a table listing the total number of events examined and the breakdown by category (on-disk/limb, active-region/quiet-Sun, front-side/far-side); (2) the explicit selection criteria and exclusion rules applied; (3) quantitative measurements of line-center and wing Doppler shifts together with intensity changes, reported with uncertainties derived from the spectral fitting; and (4) a brief discussion of the limited sample size and the consequent absence of formal statistical hypothesis tests. These additions will allow readers to evaluate the robustness of the reported distinctions while preserving the exploratory character of the study. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: purely observational classification

full rationale

The paper reports empirical Sun-as-a-star Hα spectral patterns from a set of solar filament/prominence eruptions, binned by source-region location (on-disk vs. limb, AR vs. QS) and magnetic environment. The central claim is a diagnostic basis derived directly from time-sequence observations of line-profile evolution (blueshifted/redshifted emission, line-center absorption/emission, wing features). No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or model predictions appear in the abstract or described methodology; the distinctions are presented as observed characteristics without reduction to self-definitions, self-citations as uniqueness theorems, or renaming of prior results. The analysis is self-contained against external solar-event catalogs and does not invoke load-bearing self-referential steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Observational study that classifies existing solar data; no free parameters, new axioms, or invented entities are introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5614 in / 1063 out tokens · 42001 ms · 2026-05-12T03:42:54.742170+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

we utilize high-resolution spectroscopic observations from the Chinese Hα Solar Explorer (CHASE) ... Sun-as-a-star analysis ... ΔS(t, λ) = ∫TR I(t,λ,x,y) dx dy ...
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

distinct Sun-as-a-star Hα spectral characteristics, dependent on eruption location

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

[1]

Chen, P. F. 2011, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 8, 1, doi: 10.12942/lrsp-2011-1

work page doi:10.12942/lrsp-2011-1 2011
[2]

2020, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20, 166, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/20/10/166

Chen, P.-F., Xu, A.-A., & Ding, M.-D. 2020, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20, 166, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/20/10/166

work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/20/10/166 2020
[3]

2026, ApJ, 997, 242, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae29a9

Cheng, Z., Song, A., Zhou, G., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 242, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae29a9

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae29a9 2026
[4]

2022, Atmosphere, 13, 1781, doi: 10.3390/atmos13111781

Gopalswamy, N. 2022, Atmosphere, 13, 1781, doi: 10.3390/atmos13111781

work page doi:10.3390/atmos13111781 2022
[5]

K., Schrijver, C

Harra, L. K., Schrijver, C. J., Janvier, M., et al. 2016, SoPh, 291, 1761, doi: 10.1007/s11207-016-0923-0

work page doi:10.1007/s11207-016-0923-0 2016
[6]

2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 959, 69, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad08bd

Hou, Y., Li, C., Li, T., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 959, 69, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad08bd

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad08bd 2023
[7]

J., Li, T., Song, Z

Hou, Y. J., Li, T., Song, Z. P., & Zhang, J. 2020, A&A, 640, A101, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038348

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038348 2020
[8]

J., Zhang, J., Li, T., Yang, S

Hou, Y. J., Zhang, J., Li, T., Yang, S. H., & Li, X. H. 2018, A&A, 619, A100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732530

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732530 2018
[9]

2024, PASJ, 76, 175, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psae001

Inoue, S., Enoto, T., Namekata, K., et al. 2024, PASJ, 76, 175, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psae001

work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psae001 2024
[10]

2025, ApJ, 979, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad91b9

Kajikiya, Y., Namekata, K., Notsu, Y., et al. 2025, ApJ, 979, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad91b9

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad91b9 2025
[11]

Kowalski, A. F. 2024, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 21, 1, doi: 10.1007/s41116-024-00039-4

work page doi:10.1007/s41116-024-00039-4 2024
[12]

2022, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 65, 289602, doi: 10.1007/s11433-022-1893-3

Li, C., Fang, C., Li, Z., et al. 2022, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 65, 289602, doi: 10.1007/s11433-022-1893-3

work page doi:10.1007/s11433-022-1893-3 2022
[13]

2025, ApJ, 993, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0743

Liu, X., Hou, Y., Li, Y., et al. 2025, ApJ, 993, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0743

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0743 2025
[14]

C., & Hundhausen, J

Low, B. C., & Hundhausen, J. R. 1995, ApJ, 443, 818, doi: 10.1086/175572

work page doi:10.1086/175572 1995
[15]

2023, ApJ, 953, 68, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd6a1

Lu, H.-p., Tian, H., Chen, H.-c., et al. 2023, ApJ, 953, 68, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd6a1

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd6a1 2023
[16]

2025, ApJL, 978, L32, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad93cc 12

Lu, H.-P., Tian, H., Zhang, L.-Y., et al. 2025, ApJL, 978, L32, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad93cc 12

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad93cc 2025
[17]

J., Palmerio, E., DeVore, C

Lynch, B. J., Palmerio, E., DeVore, C. R., et al. 2021, ApJ, 914, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf9a9

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf9a9 2021
[18]

L., Lao, Q

Ma, Y. L., Lao, Q. H., Cheng, X., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3446

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3446 2024
[19]

H., Karpen, J

Mackay, D. H., Karpen, J. T., Ballester, J. L., Schmieder, B., & Aulanier, G. 2010, SSRv, 151, 333, doi: 10.1007/s11214-010-9628-0

work page doi:10.1007/s11214-010-9628-0 2010
[20]

T., & Shibata, K

Namekata, K., Ichimoto, K., Ishii, T. T., & Shibata, K. 2022, ApJ, 933, 209, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac75cd

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac75cd 2022
[21]

2021, Nature Astronomy, 6, 241, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01532-8

Namekata, K., Maehara, H., Honda, S., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 6, 241, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01532-8

work page doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01532-8 2021
[22]

S., Petit, P., et al

Namekata, K., Airapetian, V. S., Petit, P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 23, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0b7c

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0b7c 2024
[23]

2026, Nature Astronomy, 10, 64, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02691-8

Namekata, K., France, K., Chae, J., et al. 2026, Nature Astronomy, 10, 64, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02691-8

work page doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02691-8 2026
[24]

Newton, H. W. 1943, MNRAS, 103, 244, doi: 10.1093/mnras/103.5.244

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/103.5.244 1943
[25]

2024, ApJ, 964, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad24ec

Otsu, T., & Asai, A. 2024, ApJ, 964, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad24ec

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad24ec 2024
[26]

T., & Namekata, K

Otsu, T., Asai, A., Ichimoto, K., Ishii, T. T., & Namekata, K. 2022, ApJ, 939, 98, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9730

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9730 2022
[27]

2024, ApJL, 974, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7a70

Otsu, T., Asai, A., Ikuta, K., & Shibata, K. 2024, ApJL, 974, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7a70

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad7a70 2024
[28]

2014, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 11, 1, doi: 10.12942/lrsp-2014-1

Parenti, S. 2014, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 11, 1, doi: 10.12942/lrsp-2014-1

work page doi:10.12942/lrsp-2014-1 2014
[29]

Pietrow, A. G. M., Cretignier, M., Druett, M. K., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A46, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347895

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347895 2024
[30]

2014, Magnetohydrodynamics of the Sun, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139020732

Priest, E. 2014, Magnetohydrodynamics of the Sun, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139020732

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139020732 2014
[31]

2024, ApJL, 961, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1e4f

Qiu, Y., Li, C., Guo, Y., et al. 2024, ApJL, 961, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1e4f

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad1e4f 2024
[32]

2022, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 65, 289603, doi: 10.1007/s11433-022-1900-5

Qiu, Y., Rao, S., Li, C., et al. 2022, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 65, 289603, doi: 10.1007/s11433-022-1900-5

work page doi:10.1007/s11433-022-1900-5 2022
[33]

2025, ApJ, 978, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad96ba

Sahade, A., Vourlidas, A., & Mac Cormack, C. 2025, ApJ, 978, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad96ba

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad96ba 2025
[34]

J., Kauristie, K., Aylward, A

Schrijver, C. J., Kauristie, K., Aylward, A. D., et al. 2015, Advances in Space Research, 55, 2745, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2015.03.023

work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2015.03.023 2015
[35]

2015, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol

Vial, J.-C., & Engvold, O., eds. 2015, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 415, Solar Prominences

work page 2015
[36]

T., & Liu, S

Wang, J., Hoeksema, J. T., & Liu, S. 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 125, e27530, doi: 10.1029/2019JA027530

work page doi:10.1029/2019ja027530 2020
[37]

2011, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 116, A04104, doi: 10.1029/2010JA016101

Wang, Y., Chen, C., Gui, B., et al. 2011, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 116, A04104, doi: 10.1029/2010JA016101

work page doi:10.1029/2010ja016101 2011
[38]

2025, ApJ, 984, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc377

Wu, Z., Xue, Z., Yan, X., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc377

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc377 2025
[39]

2022, ApJ, 931, 76, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac69d5

Xu, Y., Tian, H., Hou, Z., et al. 2022, ApJ, 931, 76, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac69d5

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac69d5 2022
[40]

2025, ApJ, 981, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb39e

Yan, X., Xue, Z., Wang, J., et al. 2025, ApJ, 981, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb39e

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb39e 2025
[41]

2022, ApJS, 260, 36, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6607

Yang, Z., Tian, H., Bai, X., et al. 2022, ApJS, 260, 36, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6607

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac6607 2022