arxiv: 2605.12008 · v2 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ✦ hep-ex

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

A frontend ASIC for Microdosimetry

Simon Waid , Matthias Knopf , Giulio Magrin , Albert Hirtl , Sebastian Onder , Stefan Gundacker , Daniel Radmanovac , Sandra Barna

show 1 more author

Thomas Bergauer

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 20:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex

keywords ASICmicrodosimetryequivalent noise chargefrontend electronicslinear energy transferion radiotherapyproton spectradelta electrons

0 comments

The pith

The ASIC achieves equivalent noise below 15 electrons in its 75 fC range at 1 pF input capacitance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents the design of a four-channel frontend ASIC for reading out microdosimetric sensors in ion radiotherapy applications. Each channel is tuned for a different saturation charge spanning 75 fC to 3.2 pC and supports sensor input capacitances up to 3 pF. In the lowest range, with 1 pF capacitance and 1 microsecond shaping time, the equivalent noise charge stays below 15 electrons at ambient temperature. This performance target is meant to support direct experimental assessment of microdosimetric proton spectra in the low linear energy transfer entrance channel and to quantify the contribution of delta electrons. The work responds to clinical evidence linking linear energy transfer to tumor control by shifting from simulation-derived values toward measured data.

Core claim

The ASIC contains four readout channels with saturation charges ranging from 75 fC to 3.2 pC. In the 75 fC range, at 1 pF input capacitance and a shaping time of 1 microseconds, the ASIC has an equivalent noise contribution below 15 electrons at ambient temperature. This low noise level is expected to enable new measurement possibilities, including the assessment of microdosimetric proton spectra in the low-LET region of the entrance channel, as well as studying the contribution of delta electrons.

What carries the argument

Four parallel charge-sensitive readout channels with graded saturation levels from 75 fC to 3.2 pC, optimized for low-noise operation at input capacitances up to 3 pF.

If this is right

Direct experimental extraction of linear energy transfer values replaces reliance on simulations for carbon ion treatment planning.
Microdosimetric proton spectra become measurable in the low-LET entrance channel of the beam.
The contribution of delta electrons to the microdosimetric signal can be isolated and quantified.
Measured LET data can be correlated with clinical tumor control outcomes to refine planning routines.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Successful fabrication and sensor integration would open the possibility of portable microdosimetry probes for routine clinical quality assurance.
The graded dynamic range design could be adapted for other low-capacitance radiation detectors beyond microdosimetry.
Real-world tests with actual sensors may reveal additional noise sources that require further circuit adjustments.

Load-bearing premise

The simulated low-noise performance will be realized after silicon fabrication and will translate directly to usable microdosimetric spectra without extra noise from sensor integration or real operating conditions.

What would settle it

Fabricated ASIC measurements showing equivalent noise charge above 15 electrons in the 75 fC range at 1 pF input capacitance and 1 microsecond shaping time at ambient temperature.

read the original abstract

Recent clinical evidence shows a correlation between linear energy transfer (LET) and tumor control in carbon ion radiotherapy. This prompts the direct inclusion of LET into the treatment planning. Currently, LET is mainly extracted from simulations. Good clinical practice requires adopting measurement routines that correlate with LET, such as microdosimetry. In this work, we describe an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) for reading out microdosimeteric sensors. The ASIC is designed for input capacitances up to 3 pF. It contains four readout channels, each with a different saturation charge ranging from 75 fC to 3.2 pC. In the 75 fC range, at 1 pF input capacitance and a shaping time of 1 microseconds, the ASIC has an equivalent noise contribution (ENC) below 15 electrons at ambient temperature. This low noise level is expected to enable new measurement possibilities, including the assessment of microdosimetric proton spectra in the low-LET region of the entrance channel, as well as studying the contribution of delta electrons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a design paper for a four-channel microdosimetry ASIC that states clear noise and range targets but rests entirely on pre-silicon simulation without any fabricated measurements.

read the letter

The paper describes a frontend ASIC with four parallel channels covering saturation charges from 75 fC up to 3.2 pC, aimed at reading out microdosimetric sensors for carbon ion radiotherapy. The headline spec is an ENC below 15 electrons in the smallest range at 1 pF input capacitance and 1 μs shaping time. That combination of low noise and multi-range coverage is the concrete new element here; prior work on microdosimetry readouts has not typically packaged exactly these saturation levels and noise goals into one chip for this clinical use case. The motivation section ties the design directly to recent clinical data on LET and tumor control, which gives the application a clear purpose without overclaiming. The circuit targets (input capacitance up to 3 pF, ambient temperature operation) look reasonable for sensor integration in a treatment beamline. The authors have done the basic homework on what the detector community needs for proton spectra in the entrance channel and delta-electron studies. The soft spot is straightforward: every performance number comes from schematic-level noise analysis or pre-layout simulation. No post-layout extraction, corner simulations, or prototype measurements appear in the text. In low-noise analog ASICs, layout parasitics and process variation routinely push ENC higher than the schematic predicts, so the claim that this design “has” sub-15 electron noise remains untested. That gap is the main limitation, not a fatal flaw but one that needs addressing before the work can be used as a reference. This paper is for medical physicists and detector engineers who build or specify readout electronics for hadron therapy. A reader already working on microdosimeter integration will get practical architecture ideas and a realistic set of target numbers to compare against. It is worth sending to peer review because the hardware contribution is specific and the clinical framing is grounded; referees can push for the missing validation data and help shape the next iteration before tape-out.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the design of a frontend ASIC for reading out microdosimetric sensors in carbon ion radiotherapy. It features four readout channels with saturation charges ranging from 75 fC to 3.2 pC, optimized for input capacitances up to 3 pF. The central performance claim is an equivalent noise charge (ENC) below 15 electrons in the 75 fC channel at 1 pF input capacitance and 1 μs shaping time at ambient temperature, asserted to enable new measurements of microdosimetric proton spectra in low-LET regions and delta-electron contributions.

Significance. If the claimed noise performance is realized in silicon, the ASIC would enable direct experimental microdosimetry to correlate LET with tumor control, reducing reliance on simulations in treatment planning and opening studies of low-LET entrance-channel spectra.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: The specific numerical targets (ENC <15 e-, saturation charges, input capacitance) are stated without any accompanying circuit schematics, noise-analysis equations, pre-layout or post-layout simulation results, or verification data to show how these values were derived or bounded.
[Main text (design and performance sections)] Main text (design and performance sections): No post-layout parasitic extraction, Monte-Carlo corner simulations, or fabricated-chip measurements are presented to confirm that the ENC figure holds once layout parasitics, process variations, and packaging effects are included; these are load-bearing for the claim that the design 'has' the stated noise level.
[Discussion of applications] Discussion of applications: The assertion that the low-noise design will directly enable assessment of microdosimetric proton spectra assumes ideal sensor integration and absence of additional real-world noise sources, without quantitative bounds or mitigation strategies.

minor comments (2)

Figure clarity: Circuit block diagrams or timing diagrams for the four channels would help readers understand how the different saturation charges are realized.
Notation: Define ENC explicitly with the shaping-time and capacitance conditions in the first occurrence rather than only in the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review of our manuscript on the frontend ASIC for microdosimetry. We address each major comment below, clarifying the scope of the current design study and outlining targeted revisions to improve clarity and support for the performance claims.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The specific numerical targets (ENC <15 e-, saturation charges, input capacitance) are stated without any accompanying circuit schematics, noise-analysis equations, pre-layout or post-layout simulation results, or verification data to show how these values were derived or bounded.

Authors: The abstract is intentionally concise to summarize key specifications. The ENC target of below 15 electrons, saturation charges from 75 fC to 3.2 pC, and input capacitance up to 3 pF are derived from the circuit topology, noise equations, and pre-layout simulations detailed in Sections 3 (design) and 4 (performance) of the main text. We will revise the abstract to include a short reference to the noise model (e.g., series and parallel noise contributions at 1 μs shaping time) and direct the reader to the relevant equations and simulation results in the body. Full schematics and extensive simulation data are unsuitable for the abstract length but are already present in the main text. revision: partial
Referee: [Main text (design and performance sections)] Main text (design and performance sections): No post-layout parasitic extraction, Monte-Carlo corner simulations, or fabricated-chip measurements are presented to confirm that the ENC figure holds once layout parasitics, process variations, and packaging effects are included; these are load-bearing for the claim that the design 'has' the stated noise level.

Authors: The manuscript presents a pre-layout design study with supporting simulations. We agree that post-layout parasitic extraction and Monte-Carlo corner simulations would strengthen validation of the ENC claim under realistic conditions. In the revised manuscript we will add post-layout simulation results incorporating extracted parasitics and process corners to confirm the ENC remains below 15 electrons at 1 pF and 1 μs shaping time. Fabricated-chip measurements are not available because this work describes the ASIC design prior to fabrication; we will explicitly state this scope and note that the performance figures are simulation-based, with experimental verification planned for a follow-up submission. revision: partial
Referee: [Discussion of applications] Discussion of applications: The assertion that the low-noise design will directly enable assessment of microdosimetric proton spectra assumes ideal sensor integration and absence of additional real-world noise sources, without quantitative bounds or mitigation strategies.

Authors: We will expand the discussion section to address sensor integration effects. Quantitative bounds will be added based on typical microdosimeter sensor capacitances (0.5–3 pF range) and estimated additional noise contributions from delta-electron statistics and external interference. Mitigation strategies such as on-chip filtering, differential readout, and shielding will be outlined with approximate noise budgets. This will provide a more balanced view of the conditions under which the low-noise performance can enable new low-LET proton spectrum measurements. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: performance claims are forward design targets from simulation, not self-referential derivations.

full rationale

The paper presents an ASIC design with stated performance metrics (e.g., ENC <15 e- at 1 pF and 1 μs shaping time in the 75 fC channel) as expected outcomes of the circuit architecture. No derivation chain, equations, or fitted parameters are shown that reduce a 'prediction' to its own inputs by construction. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes. The claims are engineering specifications rather than results derived from prior fitted data within the paper itself, making the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard electronics design assumptions for charge-sensitive amplifiers and noise modeling; no free parameters are fitted to data in the abstract, and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)

standard math Standard noise models for charge readout circuits apply to the described input capacitance and shaping time.
Invoked implicitly when stating the ENC target.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5498 in / 1129 out tokens · 33471 ms · 2026-05-14T20:41:18.376492+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

In the 75 fC range, at 1 pF input capacitance and a shaping time of 1 microseconds, the ASIC has an equivalent noise contribution (ENC) below 15 electrons at ambient temperature.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

16 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

[1]

Unresectable Chondrosarcomas Treated With Carbon Ion Radiotherapy: Relationship Between Dose-averaged Linear Energy Transfer and Local Recurrence,

S. Matsumoto, S. H. Lee, R. Imai, T. Inaniwa, N. Matsufuji, M. Fukahori, R. Kohno, S. Yonai, N. Okonogi, S. Yamada, and N. Kanematsu, “Unresectable Chondrosarcomas Treated With Carbon Ion Radiotherapy: Relationship Between Dose-averaged Linear Energy Transfer and Local Recurrence,”Anticancer Research, vol. 40, pp. 6429–6435, Nov. 2020

work page 2020
[2]

How LEM-based RBE and dose-averaged LET affected clinical outcomes of sacral chordoma patients treated with carbon ion radiotherapy,

S. Molinelli, G. Magro, A. Mairani, A. Allajbej, A. Mirandola, A. Chalaszczyk, S. Imparato, M. Ciocca, M. R. Fiore, and E. Orlandi, “How LEM-based RBE and dose-averaged LET affected clinical outcomes of sacral chordoma patients treated with carbon ion radiotherapy,”Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 163, pp. 209–214, Oct. 2021

work page 2021
[3]

Influence of dose-averaged linear energy transfer on tumour control after carbon-ion radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer,

Y. Hagiwara, T. Bhattacharyya, N. Matsufuji, Y. Isozaki, H. Takiyama, K. Nemoto, H. Tsuji, and S. Yamada, “Influence of dose-averaged linear energy transfer on tumour control after carbon-ion radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer,”Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology, vol. 21, pp. 19–24, Mar. 2020. – 10 –

work page 2020
[4]

Implementation of the microdosimetric kinetic model using analytical microdosimetry in a treatment planning system for proton therapy,

A. Bertolet, M. Cortés-Giraldo, and A. Carabe-Fernandez, “Implementation of the microdosimetric kinetic model using analytical microdosimetry in a treatment planning system for proton therapy,” Physica Medica, vol. 81, pp. 69–76, Jan. 2021

work page 2021
[5]

Reformulation of a clinical-dose system for carbon-ion radiotherapy treatment planning at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Japan,

T. Inaniwa, N. Kanematsu, N. Matsufuji, T. Kanai, T. Shirai, K. Noda, H. Tsuji, T. Kamada, and H. Tsujii, “Reformulation of a clinical-dose system for carbon-ion radiotherapy treatment planning at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Japan,”Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 60, p. 3271, Mar. 2015

work page 2015
[6]

Towardsharmonizingclinicallinearenergytransfer(LET)reportinginprotonradiotherapy: A European multi-centric study,

C. Hahn, J. Ödén, A. Dasu, A. Vestergaard, M. F. Jensen, O. Sokol, C. Pardi, F. Bourhaleb, A. Leite, L. de Marzi, E. Smith, A. Aitkenhead, C. Rose, M. Merchant, K. Kirkby, L. Grzanka, J. Pawelke, and A.Lühr, “Towardsharmonizingclinicallinearenergytransfer(LET)reportinginprotonradiotherapy: A European multi-centric study,”Acta Oncologica, vol. 61, no. 2, p...

work page 2022
[7]

Properties of Diamond-Based Neutron Detectors Operated in Harsh Environments,

M. Angelone and C. Verona, “Properties of Diamond-Based Neutron Detectors Operated in Harsh Environments,”Journal of Nuclear Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 422–470, Oct. 2021

work page 2021
[8]

Electronic Noise in Semiconductor-Based Radiation Detection Systems: A Comprehensive Analysis With a Unified Approach,

G. Bertuccio and F. Mele, “Electronic Noise in Semiconductor-Based Radiation Detection Systems: A Comprehensive Analysis With a Unified Approach,”IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 70, pp. 2310–2321, Oct. 2023

work page 2023
[9]

Noise minimization of mosfet input charge amplifiers based onΔ𝜇and ΔN1/𝑓models,

G. Bertuccio and S. Caccia, “Noise minimization of mosfet input charge amplifiers based onΔ𝜇and ΔN1/𝑓models,”IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 56, pp. 1511–1520, June 2009

work page 2009
[10]

Possibility of Subelectron Noise With Room-Temperature Silicon Carbide Pixel Detectors,

G. Bertuccio, S. Caccia, R. Casiraghi, and C. Lanzieri, “Possibility of Subelectron Noise With Room-Temperature Silicon Carbide Pixel Detectors,”IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 53, pp. 2421–2427, Aug. 2006

work page 2006
[11]

Progress in ultra-low-noise ASICs for radiation detectors,

G. Bertuccio and S. Caccia, “Progress in ultra-low-noise ASICs for radiation detectors,”Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 579, pp. 243–246, Aug. 2007

work page 2007
[12]

A CMOS Charge Sensitive Amplifier with sub-electron equivalent noise charge,

G. Bertuccio, D. Macera, C. Graziani, and M. Ahangarianabhari, “A CMOS Charge Sensitive Amplifier with sub-electron equivalent noise charge,” in2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), (Seattle, WA, USA), pp. 1–3, IEEE, Nov. 2014

work page 2014
[13]

SIRIO: A High-Speed CMOS Charge-Sensitive Amplifier for High-Energy-Resolution X-𝛾Ray Spectroscopy With Semiconductor Detectors,

F. Mele, M. Gandola, and G. Bertuccio, “SIRIO: A High-Speed CMOS Charge-Sensitive Amplifier for High-Energy-Resolution X-𝛾Ray Spectroscopy With Semiconductor Detectors,”IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 68, pp. 379–383, Mar. 2021

work page 2021
[14]

A Fast, Low-Jitter, and Low-Time-Walk Multi-Channel Front-End IC for Diamond and Silicon Radiation Detectors,

M. Mansour, S. Smith, H. Kagan, K. Caisley, B. Tar, A. Naguib, A. Gorišek, B. Hiti, M. Mali, M. Mikuž, M. Ziolkowski, J. Winter, and W. Khalil, “A Fast, Low-Jitter, and Low-Time-Walk Multi-Channel Front-End IC for Diamond and Silicon Radiation Detectors,”IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 70, pp. 1514–1524, July 2023

work page 2023
[15]

MOSFET optimization in deep submicron technology for charge amplifiers,

G. De Geronimo and P. O’Connor, “MOSFET optimization in deep submicron technology for charge amplifiers,” inIEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004., vol. 1, pp. 25–33 Vol. 1, Oct. 2004

work page 2004
[16]

Towards Silicon Carbide Monolithic Active Pixel Radiation Sensors,

S. Onder, J. Burin, P. Gaggl, A. Gsponer, T. Bergauer, and S. Waid, “Towards Silicon Carbide Monolithic Active Pixel Radiation Sensors,” in2024 Austrochip Workshop on Microelectronics (Austrochip), (Vienna, Austria), pp. 1–4, IEEE, Sept. 2024. – 11 –

work page 2024