pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12202 · v2 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA· math.OC

Cavity shape reconstruction with a homogeneous Robin condition via a constrained coupled complex boundary method with ADMM

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 20:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NAmath.OC
keywords inverse boundary problemshape optimizationRobin conditioncomplex boundary methodADMMCauchy datacavity reconstructionfinite element method
0
0 comments X

The pith

An unknown Robin boundary segment is recovered by minimizing the imaginary part of the solution to a complex boundary-value problem that couples one pair of Cauchy measurements.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper addresses recovering an unknown boundary portion obeying a homogeneous Robin condition from Cauchy data measured only on the accessible boundary. A single measurement is known to be compatible with infinitely many shapes, so the method reformulates the data into one complex Robin condition on the known part. The reconstruction is obtained by minimizing a cost that depends on the imaginary part of the resulting complex solution. Prior bounds on the state are added as inequality constraints to restore practical stability, and the constrained shape-optimization problem is solved by the alternating direction method of multipliers after the shape derivatives are derived.

Core claim

The overdetermined inverse problem is recast as a complex boundary-value problem whose solution's imaginary part serves as the objective for shape optimization; the formulation is augmented with inequality constraints on admissible state values to improve stability, and the resulting problem is solved using an ADMM framework with shape derivatives of the complex state.

What carries the argument

The coupled complex boundary method, which merges the given Dirichlet and Neumann data into a single complex Robin condition on the accessible boundary so that the imaginary part of the solution drives the shape cost.

If this is right

  • Shape derivatives of the complex state yield an explicit gradient for the cost functional that can be used inside the ADMM iteration.
  • The inequality constraints on the state improve robustness to noise without requiring multiple independent measurements.
  • Finite-element discretization of the complex problem produces practical reconstructions on standard test geometries.
  • The ADMM splitting separates the state constraints from the shape update, allowing modular numerical implementation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same complex-coupling idea could be tried on other inverse problems where only one pair of boundary data is available.
  • Testing the method on three-dimensional cavities would show whether the stability gained from the constraints carries over to higher dimensions.
  • If the prior bounds prove too restrictive in practice, one could replace them with a penalty term that is gradually relaxed during iteration.

Load-bearing premise

That prior admissible bounds on the state variables are known in advance and tight enough to restore uniqueness when a single measurement would otherwise admit infinitely many domains.

What would settle it

Reconstructing the boundary after deliberately widening or removing the state bounds and checking whether the recovered shape becomes unstable or jumps to a different admissible domain under the same noisy data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12202 by El Mehdi Cherrat, Julius Fergy Tiongson Rabago, Lekbir Afraites, Mustapha Essahraoui.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: illustration of enhanced concavity detection. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of results for different regularization parameters ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Cost function and gradient norm evolution for the Ellipse (E) and L-block (L) cases. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Real and imaginary parts of the state solution at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Evolution of the real and imaginary parts of the state solution for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Evolution of the real and imaginary parts of the adjoint solution for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of the ADMM-based reconstruction using ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Corresponding histories of values for the cost, gradient norm, and Hausdorff distances [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of the ADMM-based reconstruction using ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Corresponding histories of values for the cost, gradient norm, and Hausdorff dis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Effect of size and location of the initial guess with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Reconstructions with varying ρ = 2, 5, 10 under exact measurements. 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Reconstructions under noisy measurements with low noise levels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Reconstructions under noisy measurements with low noise levels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Reconstructions under noisy measurements with noise level [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Shape evolution of two of the reconstructed shapes in Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Reconstructions with multiple concave regions under different noise levels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_17.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We revisit the problem of identifying an unknown portion of a boundary subject to a Robin condition based on a pair of Cauchy data on the accessible part of the boundary. It is known that a single measurement may correspond to infinitely many admissible domains. Nonetheless, numerical strategies based on shape optimization have been shown to yield reasonable reconstructions of the unknown boundary. In this study, we propose a new application of the coupled complex boundary method to address this class of inverse boundary identification problems. The overdetermined problem is reformulated as a complex boundary value problem with a complex Robin condition that couples the Cauchy data on the accessible boundary. The reconstruction is achieved by minimizing a cost functional constructed from the imaginary part of the complex-valued solution. To improve stability with respect to noisy data and initialization, we augment the formulation with inequality constraints through prior admissible bounds on the state, leading to a constrained shape optimization problem. The shape derivative of the complex state and the corresponding shape gradient of the cost functional are derived, and the resulting problem is solved using an alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) framework. The proposed approach is implemented using the finite element method and validated through various numerical experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper revisits identifying an unknown boundary portion subject to a homogeneous Robin condition from Cauchy data on the accessible boundary. It reformulates the overdetermined problem as a complex boundary-value problem with a complex Robin condition coupling the data, minimizes a cost functional based on the imaginary part of the complex solution, augments the formulation with inequality constraints from prior admissible bounds on the state to improve stability, derives the shape derivative and gradient, and solves the resulting constrained shape optimization problem via an ADMM framework implemented with finite elements, validated on numerical experiments.

Significance. If the constrained formulation indeed restores stability and uniqueness, the work would offer a practical numerical strategy for a classically ill-posed inverse shape problem where single Cauchy measurements admit infinitely many solutions. The combination of the coupled complex boundary method with ADMM and explicit state constraints is a novel technical contribution that could extend shape-optimization techniques in numerical analysis, provided the stability claims are substantiated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that inequality constraints from prior admissible bounds on the state improve stability with respect to noisy data and initialization is load-bearing for the central contribution, yet no uniqueness result, stability estimate, or analysis is supplied showing that the admissible set excludes all but one domain consistent with the data.
  2. [Numerical experiments] The manuscript supplies no error analysis, convergence proof for the ADMM iteration, or quantitative reconstruction metrics (e.g., boundary error norms under controlled noise), leaving the practical performance of the method unverified despite the emphasis on improved stability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major concerns point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that inequality constraints from prior admissible bounds on the state improve stability with respect to noisy data and initialization is load-bearing for the central contribution, yet no uniqueness result, stability estimate, or analysis is supplied showing that the admissible set excludes all but one domain consistent with the data.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript provides no theoretical uniqueness result or stability estimate showing that the admissible set excludes all but one domain. The claim in the abstract is based on numerical observations that the constraints help avoid non-physical solutions and improve robustness. In the revision we will rephrase the abstract to state that the constraints are designed to improve stability in practice, as demonstrated by the numerical experiments, rather than asserting a general theoretical improvement. A remark will be added noting that a full analysis of uniqueness under the constraints remains open. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical experiments] The manuscript supplies no error analysis, convergence proof for the ADMM iteration, or quantitative reconstruction metrics (e.g., boundary error norms under controlled noise), leaving the practical performance of the method unverified despite the emphasis on improved stability.

    Authors: We acknowledge the lack of formal error analysis, ADMM convergence proof, and quantitative metrics. The experiments illustrate feasibility via qualitative results. In the revision we will add quantitative metrics such as boundary L2 error norms and Hausdorff distances under controlled noise levels, along with ADMM residual histories and iteration counts. A rigorous convergence proof lies beyond the present scope. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Providing a rigorous uniqueness or stability analysis for the constrained formulation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation chain is self-contained

full rationale

The paper reformulates the inverse problem as a complex Robin BVP, constructs a cost from the imaginary part of the solution, derives the shape gradient via standard complex PDE theory, and solves the constrained problem with ADMM. None of these steps reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The prior admissible bounds are introduced as an external modeling choice to address known non-uniqueness; they are not derived from the method itself. The FEM implementation and numerical experiments provide independent validation outside any internal loop. This matches the default expectation of a non-circular paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete; the central reformulation assumes the complex coupling preserves the original inverse problem.

free parameters (1)
  • state bounds
    Prior admissible bounds on the state are introduced as inequality constraints; their specific values are not stated.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The overdetermined Cauchy data can be encoded exactly by a single complex Robin condition on the accessible boundary.
    Invoked in the reformulation step of the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5530 in / 1162 out tokens · 42368 ms · 2026-05-14T20:52:25.987764+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

234 extracted references · 234 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hrizi and R

    M. Hrizi and R. Prakash and A. A. Novotny , date-added =. Approximation of unknown sources in a time fractional. Comput. Math. Appl. , pages =

  2. [2]

    Wu and R

    Q. Wu and R. Gong and W. Gong and Z. Zhang and S. Zhu , date-added =. Bioluminescence tomography via a shape optimization method based on a complex-valued model , volume =. Inverse Problems , number =

  3. [3]

    Afraites and A

    L. Afraites and A. Hadri and M. Hrizi and J. F. T. Rabago , date-added =. Statistical topological gradient and shape optimization for robust metal--semiconductor contact reconstruction , year =

  4. [4]

    J. F. T. Rabago and M. Kimura , date-added =. On the well-posedness of a. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. , pages =

  5. [5]

    Chicco , date-added =

    M. Chicco , date-added =. A maximum principle for mixed boundary value problems for elliptic equations in non-divergence form , volume =. Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. B (7) , pages =

  6. [6]

    Cherrat and L

    E. Cherrat and L. Afraites and J. F. T. Rabago , date-added =. Enhanced shape recovery in advection--diffusion problems via a novel. J. Optim. Theory Appl. , pages =

  7. [7]

    Hamdi and I

    A. Hamdi and I. Mahfoudhi , date-added =. Inverse source problem in a one-dimensional evolution linear transport equation with spatially varying coefficients: application to surface water pollution , volume =. Inverse Probl. Sci. Eng. , pages =

  8. [8]

    Hamdi , date-added =

    A. Hamdi , date-added =. Inverse source problem in a 2D linear evolution transport equation: detection of pollution source , volume =. Inverse Probl. Sci. Eng. , pages =

  9. [9]

    A. E. Badia and T. H. Duong and A. Hamdi , date-added =. Identification of a point source in a linear advection-dispersion-reaction equation: application to a pollution source problem , volume =. Inverse Problems , pages =

  10. [10]

    Andrle and A

    M. Andrle and A. E. Badia , date-added =. Identification of multiple moving pollution sources in surface waters or atmospheric media with boundary observations , volume =. Inverse Problems , pages =

  11. [11]

    A. E. Badia and T. H. Duong , date-added =. On an inverse source problem for the heat equation. Application to a pollution detection problem , volume =. J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. , pages =

  12. [12]

    Okubo , date-added =

    A. Okubo , date-added =. Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Mathematical Models , year =

  13. [13]

    Neelz , date-added =

    S. Neelz , date-added =. Limitations of an analytical solution for advection-diffusion with variable coefficients , volume =. Commun. Numer. Methods Eng. , pages =

  14. [14]

    Zoppou and J

    C. Zoppou and J. H. Knight , date-added =. Analytical solution of a spatially variable coefficient advection--diffusion equation in up to three dimensions , volume =. Appl. Math. Model. , number =

  15. [15]

    Dempe , date-added =

    S. Dempe , date-added =. Bilevel Optimization: Theory, Algorithms, Applications and a Bibliography , volume =

  16. [16]

    J. F. T. Rabago and A. Hadri and L. Afraites and A. S. Hendy and M. A. Zaky , date-added =. A robust alternating direction numerical scheme in a shape optimization setting for solving geometric inverse problems , volume =. Comput. Math. Appl. , month =

  17. [17]

    J. F. T. Rabago and L. Afraites and H. Notsu , date-added =. Detecting immersed obstacle in. SIAM J. Control & Optim. , number =

  18. [18]

    Zheng and X

    X. Zheng and X. Cheng and R. Gong , date-added =. A coupled complex boundary method for parameter identification in elliptic problems , volume =. Int. J. Comput. Math. , number =

  19. [19]

    J. F. T. Rabago , date-added =. On the new coupled complex boundary method in shape optimization framework for solving stationary free boundary problems , volume =. Math. Control Relat. Fields , number =

  20. [20]

    Cherrat and L

    E. Cherrat and L. Afraites and J. F. T. Rabago , date-added =. Shape reconstruction for advection-diffusion problems by shape optimization techniques: The case of constant velocity , volume =. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S , number =

  21. [21]

    Cherrat and L

    E. Cherrat and L. Afraites and J. F. T. Rabago , date-added =. Numerical solution by shape optimization method to an inverse shape problem in multi-dimensional advection-diffusion problem with space dependent coefficients , volume =. Appl. Math. Optim. , pages =

  22. [22]

    Azegami , date-added =

    H. Azegami , date-added =. Shape Optimization Problems , volume =

  23. [23]

    J. F. T. Rabago , date-added =. Numerical solution to the exterior. Numer. Algorithms , month =

  24. [24]

    J. F. T. Rabago , date-added =. Localization of tumor through a non-conventional numerical shape optimization technique , volume =. Appl. Numer. Math. , pages =

  25. [25]

    J. F. T. Rabago and H. Notsu , date-added =. Numerical solution to a free boundary problem for the. Appl. Math. Optim. , pages =

  26. [26]

    Afraites and J

    L. Afraites and J. F. T. Rabago , date-added =. Boundary shape reconstruction with. Comput. Appl. Math. , number =

  27. [27]

    Chakib and A

    A. Chakib and A. Ellabib and A. Nachaoui and M. Nachaoui , date-added =. A shape optimization formulation of weld pool determination , volume =. Appl. Math. Lett. , number =

  28. [28]

    Kurahashi and K

    T. Kurahashi and K. Maruoka and T. Iyama , date-added =. Numerical shape identification of cavity in three dimensions based on thermal non-destructive testing data , volume =. Eng. Optim. , number =

  29. [29]

    Pironneau , date-added =

    O. Pironneau , date-added =. Optimal

  30. [30]

    Afraites and W

    L. Afraites and W. Fang and J. F. T. Rabago , date-added =. Detecting an unknown boundary with the

  31. [31]

    C. S. Alves and N. F. M. Martins and N. C. Roberty , date-added =. Full identification of acoustic sources with multiple frequencies and boundary measurements , volume =. Inverse Prob. Imaging , number =

  32. [32]

    Giacomini and O

    M. Giacomini and O. Pantz and K. Trabelsi , date-added =. Certified Descent Algorithm for shape optimization driven by fully-computable a posteriori error estimators , volume =. ESAIM - Control Optim. Calc. Var. , pages =

  33. [33]

    W. H. Loh , date-added =. Modeling and Measurement of Contact Resistances , type =

  34. [34]

    Fang and M

    W. Fang and M. Lu , date-added =. A fast collocation method for an inverse boundary value problem, , volume =. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. , pages =

  35. [35]

    Cakoni and R

    F. Cakoni and R. Kress and C. Schuft , date-added =. Simultaneous reconstruction of shape and impedance in corrosion detection , volume =. Methods Appl. Anal. , pages =

  36. [36]

    Cakoni and R

    F. Cakoni and R. Kress and C. Schuft , date-added =. Integral equations for inverse problems in corrosion detection from partial. Inverse Problems , pages =

  37. [37]

    Sincich , date-added =

    E. Sincich , date-added =. Stability for the determination of unknown boundary and impedance with a. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , pages =

  38. [38]

    C. D. Pagani and D. Peerotti , date-added =. Identifiability problems of defects with. Inverse Problems , pages =

  39. [39]

    Fang , date-added =

    W. Fang , date-added =. Simultaneous recovery of. J. Comput. Appl. Math. , pages =

  40. [40]

    Fang and S

    W. Fang and S. Zeng , date-added =. Numerical recovery of. J. Comput. Appl. Math. , pages =

  41. [41]

    Fang and F

    W. Fang and F. Lin and Y. Ma , date-added =. Fast algorithms for boundary integral equations on elliptic domains and related inverse problems , volume =. East Asian J. Appl. Math. , pages =

  42. [42]

    Kohn and M

    R. Kohn and M. Vogelius , date-added =. Relaxation of a variational method for impedance computed tomography , volume =. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. , number =

  43. [43]

    Meftahi , date-added =

    H. Meftahi , date-added =. Stability analysis in the inverse. Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. , number =

  44. [44]

    Afraites and M

    L. Afraites and M. Dambrine and D. Kateb , date-added =. Shape methods for the transmission problem with a single measurement , volume =. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. , number =

  45. [45]

    Afraites and C

    L. Afraites and C. Masnaoui and M. Nachaoui , date-added =. Shape optimization method for an inverse geometric source problem and stability at critical shape , volume =. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S , number =

  46. [46]

    Caubet and M

    F. Caubet and M. Dambrine and D. Kateb and C. Z. Timimoun. , date-added =. A. Inverse Prob. Imaging , number =

  47. [47]

    Afraites and M

    L. Afraites and M. Dambrine and D. Kateb , date-added =. On second order shape optimization methods for electrical impedance tomography , volume =. SIAM J. Control Optim. , number =

  48. [48]

    Afraites and M

    L. Afraites and M. Dambrine and K. Eppler and D. Kateb , date-added =. DETECTING PERFECTLY INSULATED OBSTACLES BY SHAPE OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES OF ORDER TWO , volume =. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B , number =

  49. [49]

    Kress and D

    R. Kress and D. Colton , date-added =. Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnetic Scattering Theory , volume =

  50. [50]

    Caubet and M

    F. Caubet and M. Dambrine and D. Kateb , date-added =. Shape optimization methods for the inverse obstacle problem with generalized impedance boundary conditions , volume =. Inverse Problems , pages =

  51. [51]

    Kress and W

    R. Kress and W. Rundell , date-added =. Nonlinear integral equations and the iterative solution for an inverse boundary value problem , volume =. Inverse Problems , pages =

  52. [52]

    Bacchelli , date-added =

    V. Bacchelli , date-added =. Uniqueness for the determination of unknown boundary and impedance with the homogeneous. Inverse Problems , pages =

  53. [53]

    P. G. Kaup and F. Santosa and M. Vogelius , date-added =. Method for imaging corrosion damage in thin plates from electrostatic data , volume =. Inverse Problems , pages =

  54. [54]

    P. G. Kaup and F. Santosa , date-added =. Nondestructive evaluation of corrosion damage using electrostatic measurements , volume =. J. Nondestr. Eval. , pages =

  55. [55]

    Inglese , date-added =

    G. Inglese , date-added =. An inverse problem in corrosion detection , volume =. Inverse Problems , pages =

  56. [56]

    Fasino and G

    D. Fasino and G. Inglese , date-added =. Recovering nonlinear terms in an inverse boundary value problem for. J. Comput. Appl. Math. , pages =

  57. [57]

    Rundell , date-added =

    W. Rundell , date-added =. Recovering an obstacle and its impedance from. Inverse Problems , pages =

  58. [58]

    Inglese and F

    G. Inglese and F. Mariani , date-added =. Corrosion detection in conducting boundaries , volume =. Inverse Problems , pages =

  59. [59]

    Chaabane and M

    S. Chaabane and M. Jaoua , date-added =. Identification of. Inverse Problems , pages =

  60. [60]

    Alessandrini and E

    G. Alessandrini and E. Sincich , date-added =. Solving elliptic. J. Comput. Appl. Math. , pages =

  61. [61]

    Alessandrini and L

    G. Alessandrini and L. Del Piero and L. Rondi , date-added =. Stable determination of corrosion by a single electrostatic boundary measurement , volume =. Inverse Problems , pages =

  62. [62]

    Cakoni and R

    F. Cakoni and R. Kress , date-added =. Integral equations for inverse problems in corrosion detection from partial Cauchy data , volume =. Inverse Prob. Imaging , pages =

  63. [63]

    Ouaissa and A

    H. Ouaissa and A. Chakib and A. Nachaoui and M. Nachaoui , date-added =. On Numerical Approaches for Solving an Inverse. Appl. Math. Optim. , number =

  64. [64]

    E. H. Van Brummelen and A. Segal , date-added =. Numerical solution of steady free-surface flows by the adjoint optimal shape design method , volume =. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids , number =

  65. [65]

    E. H. VanBrummelen and H. C. Raven and B. Koren , date-added =. Efficient numerical solution of steady free-surface. J. Comput. Phys. , number =

  66. [66]

    Kasumba , date-added =

    H. Kasumba , date-added =. Shape optimization approaches to free-surface problems , volume =. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids , pages =

  67. [67]

    Wei and R

    S. Wei and R. W. Smith and H. S. Udaykumar and M. M. Rao , date-added =. Computational Fluid Dynamics with Moving Boundaries , year =

  68. [68]

    Volkov and B

    O. Volkov and B. Protas and W. Liao and D. W. Glander , date-added =. Adjoint-based optimization of thermo-fluid phenomena in welding processes , volume =. J. Eng. Math. , number =

  69. [69]

    Alessandrini and G

    B. Alessandrini and G. Delhommeau , date-added =. Simulation of three-dimensional unsteady viscous free surface flow around a ship model , volume =. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids , number =

  70. [70]

    K. T. K\". Free surfaces: shape sensitivity analysis and numerical methods , volume =. Int. J. Numer .Methods Eng. , number =

  71. [71]

    Saito and L

    H. Saito and L. E. Scriven , date-added =. Study of coating flow by the finite element method , volume =. J. Comput. Phys. , pages =

  72. [72]

    I. Babu. The theory of small changes in the domain of existence in the theory of partial differential equations and its applications , year =

  73. [73]

    G. P. Galdi , date-added =. An introduction to the mathematical theory of the

  74. [74]

    Girault and P.A

    V. Girault and P.A. Raviart , date-added =. Finite element methods for Navier--Stokes equations , year =

  75. [75]

    G. J. Beavers and D. D. Joseph , date-added =. Boundary conditions of a naturally permeable wall , volume =. J. Fluid Mech. , pages =

  76. [76]

    Liakos , date-added =

    A. Liakos , date-added =. Discretization of the. Num. Meth. for Partial Diff. Eq. , number =

  77. [77]

    Harbrecht , date-added =

    H. Harbrecht , date-added =. A. Computing , number =

  78. [78]

    Sunayama and M

    Y. Sunayama and M. Kimura and J. F. T. Rabago , date-added =. Comoving mesh method for certain classes of moving boundary problems , volume =. Japan J. Indust. Appl. Math. , pages =

  79. [79]

    Eppler and H

    K. Eppler and H. Harbrecht , date-added =. Compact gradient tracking in shape optimization , volume =. Comput. Optim. Appl. , pages =

  80. [80]

    Wloka , date-added =

    J. Wloka , date-added =. Partial Differential Equations , year =

Showing first 80 references.