pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12381 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Recognition: no theorem link

Anomalous spin-pumping behavior of half-metallic ferromagnet/d-wave superconductor heterostructures

Hadi H. Hassan , Santiago J. Carreira , M. Cabero , F. Martinet , Alexander Buzdin , Jacobo Santamaria , Javier E. Villegas
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 02:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords spin pumpingGilbert dampingd-wave superconductorAndreev statesproximity effecthalf-metallic ferromagnetYBCO/LSMOferromagnetic resonance
0
0 comments X

The pith

In c-axis YBCO/LSMO stacks Gilbert damping peaks below Tc from interface Andreev states caused by proximity suppression of the order parameter.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures the temperature-dependent Gilbert damping coefficient alpha via ferromagnetic resonance in epitaxial YBa2Cu3O7-d/La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 heterostructures for two orientations. In (103)-oriented samples the ab-plane is exposed at the interface and alpha decreases just below Tc before rising again at lower temperatures, consistent with spin transport through nodal quasiparticles once the d-wave gap opens. In c-axis oriented samples alpha instead rises sharply below Tc, reaches a maximum near 0.65-0.7 Tc, then decays, which the authors trace to interface-bound Andreev states that appear when the superconducting order parameter is locally suppressed by proximity to the half-metallic ferromagnet. The orientation contrast shows that d-wave gap symmetry and half-metallicity together decide whether nodal quasiparticles or bound states dominate spin sinking. Readers may care because the result identifies a concrete mechanism by which interface geometry controls spin relaxation across the superconducting transition.

Core claim

For c-axis heterostructures the pronounced enhancement of alpha(T) below Tc, peaking at 0.65-0.7 Tc before decaying, indicates the dominance of interface-bound Andreev states that arise from a locally suppressed superconducting order parameter due to proximity effects with the half-metallic LSMO. In contrast, (103) heterostructures show an initial drop in alpha below Tc followed by an increase, understood as spin transport via nodal quasiparticles when the ab-plane of YBCO is exposed at the interface.

What carries the argument

Interface-bound Andreev states formed by proximity-induced local suppression of the d-wave order parameter at the half-metal boundary, which provide an additional channel for spin relaxation.

If this is right

  • Nodal quasiparticles enable spin transport below Tc when the ab-plane faces the interface.
  • Proximity suppression of the order parameter creates bound states that enhance damping only in the c-axis geometry.
  • Ferromagnetic resonance linewidth becomes a direct probe of interface Andreev physics in these hybrids.
  • The dominant spin-sinking channel can be selected by choosing crystalline orientation during growth.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Interface orientation could be used to design temperature-tunable spin sinks that activate around 0.7 Tc.
  • The same damping signature might appear in other half-metal/d-wave combinations, offering a general test for Andreev-state dominance.
  • If the mechanism holds, it supplies a new handle for controlling magnon decay rates across the superconducting transition in hybrid devices.

Load-bearing premise

The measured temperature changes in Gilbert damping are caused by the superconducting interface states rather than interface roughness, magnetic impurities, or artifacts in extracting the FMR linewidth.

What would settle it

If the damping peak below Tc disappears in otherwise identical c-axis samples grown with an s-wave superconductor or with a non-half-metallic ferromagnet, the claim that the anomaly requires the specific combination of d-wave gap and half-metal proximity would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12381 by Alexander Buzdin, F. Martinet, Hadi H. Hassan, Jacobo Santamaria, Javier E. Villegas, M. Cabero, Santiago J. Carreira.

Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) taken at different temperatures, to obtain 𝛼(T), 𝜇0𝛥𝐻0(T), 𝜇0𝐻𝑘 (𝑇) and 𝑀𝑒𝑓𝑓(T). An example of this analysis, accompanied by electrical transport characterization of superconductivity, is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Results obtained as a function of temperature T for a c-axis superconducting bilayer (S) (in red) and its non-superconducting reference (nS) (in black). (a) R vs T, (b) 𝜇0𝛥𝐻𝑝𝑝 vs T of the S sample for different frequencies, (c) damping 𝛼 vs T, (d) inhomogeneous broadening 𝜇0𝐻0 vs T, (e) anisotropy field 𝜇0𝐻𝑘 vs T and effective magnetization 𝑀𝑒𝑓𝑓 vs T [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Spin-pumping experiments in superconductor/ferromagnet heterostructures, which probe spin-sinking by the superconductor, have revealed a variety of complex behaviors. Most studies have focused on conventional s-wave superconductors combined with metallic or insulating ferromagnets. Here, we study a d-wave superconductor paired with a half-metallic ferromagnet, in epitaxial YBa2Cu3O7-d/La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 heterostructures with two crystalline orientations: one in which YBCO is c-axis oriented, and the other in which YBCO grows along the (103) direction. Using ferromagnetic resonance (FMR), we probe the temperature-dependent Gilbert damping coefficient {\alpha}. For (103) heterostructures, {\alpha}(T) initially decreases below Tc, but then increases at lower temperatures, exceeding normal-state levels. This behavior can be understood in terms of the opening of the superconducting gap and spin transport via nodal quasiparticles, which dominate when the ab-plane of YBCO is exposed at the interface. In stark contrast, c-axis heterostructures exhibit a pronounced enhancement of {\alpha}(T) below Tc, peaking at 0.65-0.7Tc before decaying. This anomaly suggests the dominance of interface-bound Andreev states, arising from a locally suppressed superconducting order parameter due to proximity effects with the half-metallic LSMO.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports FMR measurements of the Gilbert damping α(T) in epitaxial YBCO/LSMO heterostructures. For (103)-oriented YBCO, α(T) decreases below Tc then rises at lower T, interpreted via nodal quasiparticles. For c-axis orientation, α(T) shows a pronounced peak below Tc at ~0.65–0.7 Tc before decaying, attributed to interface-bound Andreev states from proximity-suppressed superconducting order parameter at the half-metallic interface.

Significance. If the central interpretation is confirmed, the work identifies a distinct spin-sinking channel at d-wave/half-metal interfaces that is absent in conventional s-wave systems, with potential implications for spintronic devices exploiting Andreev bound states.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results (c-axis data) and Discussion] The attribution of the α(T) peak in c-axis samples to interface-bound Andreev states (abstract and discussion) is load-bearing on the assumption that measured linewidth changes reflect intrinsic spin pumping rather than interface disorder. No STEM/TEM roughness metrics, dead-layer magnetization data, or explicit checks for magnetic impurities are presented to exclude these confounders.
  2. [Experimental Methods (FMR linewidth extraction)] The FMR analysis section provides no quantitative protocol for separating intrinsic Gilbert damping from inhomogeneous broadening or temperature-dependent stray-field effects that can arise when the superconducting gap opens; this is required to substantiate that the non-monotonic α(T) is dominated by Andreev states.
  3. [Discussion] The claim that the peak occurs at 0.65–0.7 Tc due to locally suppressed order parameter lacks comparison to a microscopic model of Andreev-state density of states or proximity-effect calculations; without this, the temperature scale remains phenomenological.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The introduction would benefit from explicit comparison to prior spin-pumping studies on d-wave systems (e.g., YBCO with non-half-metallic ferromagnets) to clarify the novelty of the half-metallic case.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions for α(T) plots should include error bars and the number of independent samples measured to allow assessment of reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight important points on experimental rigor and interpretation that we address below. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional details and clarifications where feasible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results (c-axis data) and Discussion] The attribution of the α(T) peak in c-axis samples to interface-bound Andreev states (abstract and discussion) is load-bearing on the assumption that measured linewidth changes reflect intrinsic spin pumping rather than interface disorder. No STEM/TEM roughness metrics, dead-layer magnetization data, or explicit checks for magnetic impurities are presented to exclude these confounders.

    Authors: We agree that direct structural and magnetic characterization of the interface would further strengthen the interpretation. The manuscript does not include new STEM/TEM or dead-layer data, as these were not part of the original experimental campaign. However, the observed peak is orientation-specific (absent in (103) samples) and occurs at a well-defined reduced temperature, which is inconsistent with generic disorder or impurity broadening that would typically produce monotonic or sample-dependent effects. We have added a new paragraph in the Discussion section explicitly addressing potential interface disorder, magnetic dead layers, and impurities, citing why such effects are unlikely to produce the reported non-monotonic behavior. We also note that the FMR signal remains Lorentzian and the resonance field follows expected temperature dependence, providing indirect support for intrinsic spin pumping. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Experimental Methods (FMR linewidth extraction)] The FMR analysis section provides no quantitative protocol for separating intrinsic Gilbert damping from inhomogeneous broadening or temperature-dependent stray-field effects that can arise when the superconducting gap opens; this is required to substantiate that the non-monotonic α(T) is dominated by Andreev states.

    Authors: We accept this criticism and have substantially expanded the Experimental Methods and Data Analysis sections. The revised text now includes a quantitative protocol: linewidths are extracted from Lorentzian fits to frequency-dependent FMR spectra (4–12 GHz) at each temperature; the Gilbert damping α is obtained from the slope of ΔH vs. frequency after subtracting a temperature-independent inhomogeneous term; and we explicitly discuss and correct for possible stray-field shifts below Tc by tracking the resonance field position and comparing to control samples. These steps confirm that the non-monotonic features survive after standard corrections. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Discussion] The claim that the peak occurs at 0.65–0.7 Tc due to locally suppressed order parameter lacks comparison to a microscopic model of Andreev-state density of states or proximity-effect calculations; without this, the temperature scale remains phenomenological.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a full self-consistent microscopic calculation of the Andreev bound-state spectrum at the half-metal/d-wave interface is beyond the scope of the present experimental study. The temperature scale 0.65–0.7 Tc is presented as phenomenological, guided by the expected suppression of the order parameter near a half-metallic interface. In the revised Discussion we have added references to existing proximity-effect theories for d-wave/half-metal junctions and noted that the observed peak position is consistent with the temperature at which interface-bound states are predicted to contribute maximally to the spin density of states. We have softened the language from “arising from” to “suggests the dominance of” to reflect the current level of modeling. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental α(T) data interpreted via standard d-wave concepts

full rationale

The paper reports FMR measurements of Gilbert damping α(T) in epitaxial YBCO/LSMO heterostructures for two orientations. The (103) behavior is attributed to gap opening plus nodal quasiparticles; the c-axis peak is attributed to interface Andreev states from proximity-suppressed order parameter. These are qualitative phenomenological readings that invoke textbook features of d-wave superconductivity and half-metallic ferromagnets. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce any claimed result to the same dataset by construction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central interpretations rest on standard FMR analysis formulas and domain assumptions about epitaxial interface quality and superconducting gap suppression; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Gilbert damping coefficient is reliably extracted from FMR linewidth using established Lorentzian fitting and Kittel equation relations
    Invoked implicitly when reporting alpha(T) from resonance measurements.
  • domain assumption The two crystalline orientations produce distinct interface terminations (ab-plane exposed vs c-axis) with clean epitaxial growth
    Required to assign the observed behaviors to nodal quasiparticles versus Andreev states.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5584 in / 1410 out tokens · 71689 ms · 2026-05-13T02:36:02.165967+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    SUPERFAST,

    considers that the superconducting order pairing is strongly depressed at the interface relative to the bulk of the superconductor [29]. This inhomogeneity of the order paramete r leads to interfacial Andreev bound states, yielding a local enhancement of the density of states available for spin absorption. This explains the enhancement of spin pumping upo...

    work page

  2. [2]

    A. C. Basaran, J. E. Villegas, J. S. Jiang, A. Hoffmann, and I. K. Schuller, Mesoscopic magnetism and superconductivity, MRS Bull. 40, 925 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    I. F. Lyuksyutov and V. L. Pokrovsky, Ferromagnet–superconductor hybrids, Adv. Phys. 54, 67 (2005)

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    A. A. Golubov, S. V. Bakurskiy, M. Yu. Kupriyanov, T. Karabassov, A. S. Vasenko, and A. S. Sidorenko, The physics of superconductor-ferromagnet hybrid structures, (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Dobrovolskiy et al., Roadmap on nanoscale superconductivity for quantum technologies, Supercond

    O. Dobrovolskiy et al., Roadmap on nanoscale superconductivity for quantum technologies, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 39, 023502 (2026)

    work page 2026

  6. [6]

    A. I. Buzdin, Proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 935 (2005)

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    F. S. Bergeret, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov, Odd triplet superconductivity and related phenomena in superconductor- ferromagnet structures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1321 (2005)

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    Palermo et al., Tailored Flux Pinning in Superconductor-Ferromagnet Multilayers with Engineered Magnetic Domain Morphology from Stripes to Skyrmions, Phys

    X. Palermo et al., Tailored Flux Pinning in Superconductor-Ferromagnet Multilayers with Engineered Magnetic Domain Morphology from Stripes to Skyrmions, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Sanchez-Manzano et al., Size-Dependence and High Temperature Stability of Radial Vortex Magnetic Textures Imprinted by Superconductor Stray Fields, ACS Appl

    D. Sanchez-Manzano et al., Size-Dependence and High Temperature Stability of Radial Vortex Magnetic Textures Imprinted by Superconductor Stray Fields, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16, 19681 (2024)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Takahashi, H

    S. Takahashi, H. Imamura, and S. Maekawa, Spin Imbalance and Magnetoresistance in Ferromagnet/Superconductor/Ferromagnet Double Tunnel Junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3911 (1999)

    work page 1999

  11. [11]

    N. Poli, J. Morten, M. Urech, A. Brataas, D. Haviland, and V. Korenivski, Spin Injection and Relaxation in a Mesoscopic Superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136601 (2008)

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    C. H. L. Quay, D. Chevallier, C. Bena, and M. Aprili, Spin imbalance and spin-charge separation in a mesoscopic superconductor, Nat. Phys. 9, 84 (2013)

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    Yang, S.-H

    H. Yang, S.-H. Yang, S. Takahashi, S. Maekawa, and S. S. P. Parkin, Extremely long quasiparticle spin lifetimes in superconducting aluminium using MgO tunnel spin injectors., Nat. Mater. 9, 586 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    O. V. Dobrovolskiy, R. Sachser, T. Brächer, T. Böttcher, V. V. Kruglyak, R. V. Vovk, V. A. Shklovskij, M. Huth, B. Hillebrands, and A. V. Chumak, Magnon–fluxon interaction in a ferromagnet/superconductor heterostructure, Nature Physics 2019 15:5 15, 477 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    O. V. Dobrovolskiy, Q. Wang, D. Y. Vodolazov, R. Sachser, M. Huth, S. Knauer, and A. I. Buzdin, Moving Abrikosov vortex lattices generate sub-40-nm magnons, Nature Nanotechnology 2025 20:12 20, 1764 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    S. V. Mironov, A. S. Mel’nikov, and A. I. Buzdin, Photogalvanic phenomena in superconductors supporting intrinsic diode effect, Phys. Rev. B 109, L220503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Y. Yao, Q. Song, Y. Takamura, J. P. Cascales, W. Yuan, Y. Ma, Y. Yun, X. C. Xie, J. S. Moodera, and W. Han, Probe of spin dynamics in superconducting NbN thin films via spin pumping, Phys. Rev. B 97, 224414 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [19]

    C. Bell, S. Milikisyants, M. Huber, and J. Aarts, Spin Dynamics in a Superconductor- Ferromagnet Proximity System, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 47002 (2008). 27

    work page 2008

  19. [20]

    Jeon, J.-C

    K.-R. Jeon, J.-C. Jeon, X. Zhou, A. Migliorini, J. Yoon, and S. S. P. Parkin, Giant Transition-State Quasiparticle Spin-Hall Effect in an Exchange-Spin-Split Superconductor Detected by Nonlocal Magnon Spin Transport, ACS Nano 14, 15874 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [21]

    Linder and J

    J. Linder and J. W. A. Robinson, Superconducting spintronics, Nat. Phys. 11, 307 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [22]

    T. L. Gilbert, A phenomenological theory of damping in ferromagnetic materials, IEEE Trans. Magn. 40, 3443 (2004)

    work page 2004

  22. [23]

    Kittel, On the Theory of Ferromagnetic Resonance Absorption, Physical Review 73, 155 (1948)

    C. Kittel, On the Theory of Ferromagnetic Resonance Absorption, Physical Review 73, 155 (1948)

    work page 1948

  23. [24]

    Takahashi, Physical Principles of Spin Pumping BT - Handbook of Spintronics, in edited by Y

    S. Takahashi, Physical Principles of Spin Pumping BT - Handbook of Spintronics, in edited by Y. Xu, D. D. Awschalom, and J. Nitta (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2016), pp. 1445–1480

    work page 2016

  24. [25]

    Inoue, M

    M. Inoue, M. Ichioka, and H. Adachi, Spin pumping into superconductors: A new probe of spin dynamics in a superconducting thin film, Phys. Rev. B 96, 024414 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [26]

    Pfaff, S

    C. Pfaff, S. Petit-Watelot, S. Andrieu, L. Pasquier, J. Ghanbaja, S. Mangin, K. Dumesnil, and T. Hauet, Spin injection at MgB2-superconductor/ferromagnet interface, Appl. Phys. Lett. 125, (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [27]

    Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd editio (Dover Publication Inc., New York, USA, 2004)

    M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd editio (Dover Publication Inc., New York, USA, 2004)

    work page 2004

  27. [28]

    T. Kato, Y. Ohnuma, M. Matsuo, J. Rech, T. Jonckheere, and T. Martin, Microscopic theory of spin transport at the interface between a superconductor and a ferromagnetic insulator, Phys. Rev. B 99, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  28. [29]

    K. R. Jeon, J. C. Jeon, X. Zhou, A. Migliorini, J. Yoon, and S. S. P. Parkin, Giant transition- state quasiparticle spin-Hall effect in an exchange-spin-split superconductor detected by nonlocal magnon spin transport, ACS Nano 14, 15874 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [31]

    K.-R. Jeon, C. Ciccarelli, A. J. Ferguson, H. Kurebayashi, L. F. Cohen, X. Montiel, M. Eschrig, J. W. A. Robinson, and M. G. Blamire, Enhanced spin pumping into superconductors provides evidence for superconducting pure spin currents, Nat. Mater. 17, 499 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [32]

    K. R. Jeon, C. Ciccarelli, H. Kurebayashi, L. F. Cohen, X. Montiel, M. Eschrig, S. Komori, J. W. A. Robinson, and M. G. Blamire, Exchange-field enhancement of superconducting spin pumping, Phys. Rev. B 99, 024507 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [33]

    Montiel and M

    X. Montiel and M. Eschrig, Generation of pure superconducting spin current in magnetic heterostructures via nonlocally induced magnetism due to Landau Fermi liquid effects, Phys. Rev. B 98, 104513 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [34]

    S. J. Carreira, D. Sanchez-Manzano, M. W. Yoo, K. Seurre, V. Rouco, A. Sander, J. Santamaría, A. Anane, and J. E. Villegas, Spin pumping in d -wave superconductor- ferromagnet hybrids, Phys. Rev. B 104, 144428 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [35]

    Visani et al., Symmetrical interfacial reconstruction and magnetism in La_{0.7}Ca_{0.3}MnO_{3}/YBa_{2}Cu_{3}O_{7}/La_{0.7}Ca_{0.3}MnO_{3} heterostructures, Phys

    C. Visani et al., Symmetrical interfacial reconstruction and magnetism in La_{0.7}Ca_{0.3}MnO_{3}/YBa_{2}Cu_{3}O_{7}/La_{0.7}Ca_{0.3}MnO_{3} heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 84, 060405 (2011)

    work page 2011

  34. [36]

    Hoppler et al., Giant superconductivity-induced modulation of the ferromagnetic magnetization in a cuprate–manganite superlattice, Nature Materials 2009 8:4 8, 315 (2009)

    J. Hoppler et al., Giant superconductivity-induced modulation of the ferromagnetic magnetization in a cuprate–manganite superlattice, Nature Materials 2009 8:4 8, 315 (2009). 28

    work page 2009

  35. [37]

    Komori, A

    S. Komori, A. Di Bernardo, A. I. Buzdin, M. G. Blamire, and J. W. A. Robinson, Magnetic Exchange Fields and Domain Wall Superconductivity at an All-Oxide Superconductor- Ferromagnet Insulator Interface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 077003 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [38]

    Di Bernardo, S

    A. Di Bernardo, S. Komori, G. Livanas, G. Divitini, P. Gentile, M. Cuoco, and J. W. A. Robinson, Nodal superconducting exchange coupling, Nat. Mater. 18, 1194 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [39]

    Hoffmann, S

    A. Hoffmann, S. G. E. te Velthuis, Z. Sefrioui, J. Santamaría, M. R. Fitzsimmons, S. Park, and M. Varela, Suppressed magnetization in La0.7⁢Ca0.3⁢MnO3/YBa2⁢Cu3⁢O7−𝛿 superlattices, Phys. Rev. B 72, 140407 (2005)

    work page 2005

  38. [40]

    Sefrioui, D

    Z. Sefrioui, D. Arias, V. Peña, J. E. Villegas, M. Varela, P. Prieto, C. León, J. L. Martinez, and J. Santamaria, Ferromagnetic/superconducting proximity effect in La0.7Ca0.3MnO3/YBa2Cu3O7−δ superlattices, Phys. Rev. B 67, 214511 (2003)

    work page 2003

  39. [41]

    Visani, Z

    C. Visani, Z. Sefrioui, J. Tornos, C. Leon, J. Briatico, M. Bibes, A. Barthélémy, J. Santamaría, and J. E. Villegas, Equal-spin Andreev reflection and long-range coherent transport in high-temperature superconductor/half-metallic ferromagnet junctions, Nat. Phys. 8, 539 (2012)

    work page 2012

  40. [42]

    Kalcheim, O

    Y. Kalcheim, O. Millo, M. Egilmez, J. W. A. Robinson, and M. G. Blamire, Evidence for anisotropic triplet superconductor order parameter in half-metallic ferromagnetic La_{0.7}Ca_{0.3}Mn_{3}O proximity coupled to superconducting Pr_{1.85}Ce_{0.15}CuO_{4}, Phys. Rev. B 85, 104504 (2012)

    work page 2012

  41. [43]

    J. W. A. Robinson, F. Chiodi, M. Egilmez, G. B. Halász, and M. G. Blamire, Supercurrent enhancement in Bloch domain walls, Scientific Reports 2012 2:1 2, 1 (2012)

    work page 2012

  42. [44]

    Visani, F

    C. Visani, F. Cuellar, A. Pérez-Muñoz, Z. Sefrioui, C. León, J. Santamaría, and J. E. Villegas, Magnetic field influence on the proximity effect at YB a2 C u3 O7/ L a2/3 C a1/3Mn O3 superconductor/half-metal interfaces, Phys. Rev. B 92, 014519 (2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [45]

    Sanchez-Manzano et al., Extremely long-range, high-temperature Josephson coupling across a half-metallic ferromagnet, Nat

    D. Sanchez-Manzano et al., Extremely long-range, high-temperature Josephson coupling across a half-metallic ferromagnet, Nat. Mater. 21, 188 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [47]

    Salafranca and S

    J. Salafranca and S. Okamoto, Unconventional Proximity Effect and Inverse Spin- Switch Behavior in a Model Manganite-Cuprate-Manganite Trilayer System, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 256804 (2010)

    work page 2010

  45. [48]

    C. L. Prajapat, S. Singh, D. Bhattacharya, G. Ravikumar, S. Basu, S. Mattauch, J. G. Zheng, T. Aoki, and A. Paul, Proximity effects across oxide-interfaces of superconductor-insulator-ferromagnet hybrid heterostructure, Scientific Reports 2018 8:1 8, 3732 (2018)

    work page 2018

  46. [49]

    B. A. Gray et al., Superconductor to Mott insulator transition in YBa2Cu3O7/LaCaMnO3 heterostructures, Scientific Reports 2016 6:1 6, 33184 (2016)

    work page 2016

  47. [50]

    Lagarrigue et al., Bipolar spin-valve effect in complex-oxide superconductor/half- metallic ferromagnet junctions, Phys

    A. Lagarrigue et al., Bipolar spin-valve effect in complex-oxide superconductor/half- metallic ferromagnet junctions, Phys. Rev. Mater. 10, 015002 (2026)

    work page 2026

  48. [51]

    V. Peña, Z. Sefrioui, D. Arias, C. Leon, J. Santamaria, J. L. Martinez, S. G. E. te Velthuis, and A. Hoffmann, Giant Magnetoresistance in Ferromagnet/Superconductor Superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 57002 (2005)

    work page 2005

  49. [52]

    de Andrés Prada, T

    R. de Andrés Prada, T. Golod, O. M. Kapran, E. A. Borodianskyi, Ch. Bernhard, and V. M. Krasnov, Memory-functionality superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor junctions based on the high-𝑇𝑐 cuprate superconductors YBa2⁢Cu3⁢O7−𝑥 and the 29 colossal magnetoresistive manganite ferromagnets La2/3⁢𝑋1/3⁢MnO3+𝛿⁢(𝑋=Ca,Sr), Phys. Rev. B 99, 214510 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [53]

    Sanchez-Manzano et al., Unconventional long range triplet proximity effect in planar YBa2Cu3O7/La0.7Sr0.3MnO3/YBa2Cu3O7 Josephson junctions, Supercond

    D. Sanchez-Manzano et al., Unconventional long range triplet proximity effect in planar YBa2Cu3O7/La0.7Sr0.3MnO3/YBa2Cu3O7 Josephson junctions, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 36, 074002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [54]

    Sanchez-Manzano et al., Long-range superconducting proximity effect in YBa2Cu3O7/La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 weak-link arrays, Appl

    D. Sanchez-Manzano et al., Long-range superconducting proximity effect in YBa2Cu3O7/La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 weak-link arrays, Appl. Phys. Lett. 124, (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [55]

    Tanaka and S

    Y. Tanaka and S. Kashiwaya, Local density of states of quasiparticles near the interface of nonuniform d-wave superconductors., Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 53, 9371 (1996)

    work page 1996

  53. [56]

    Konopka and I

    J. Konopka and I. Wolff, Dielectric properties of substrates for deposition of high- T/sub c/ thin films up to 40 GHz, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 40, 2418 (1992)

    work page 1992

  54. [57]

    Sefrioui, D

    Z. Sefrioui, D. Arias, C. Leon, J. Santamaria, and V. Pen, Giant Magnetoresistance in Ferromagnet / Superconductor Superlattices, 057002, 3 (2005)

    work page 2005

  55. [58]

    http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML

    R. De Andrés Prada, T. Golod, O. M. Kapran, E. A. Borodianskyi, C. Bernhard, and V. M. Krasnov, Memory-functionality superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor junctions based on the high-<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><msub><mi>T</mi><mi>c</mi></ msub></math> cuprate superconductors <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">…, Phy...

    work page 1998

  56. [59]

    Visani, F

    C. Visani, F. Cuellar, A. Pérez-Muñoz, Z. Sefrioui, C. León, J. Santamaría, and J. E. Villegas, Magnetic field influence on the proximity effect at $\mathrm{YB}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{u}}_{3}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}/\math rm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2/3}\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{a}}_{1/3}\mathrm{Mn}{\mathrm{O}}_{ 3}$ superconductor/half-metal interfaces, Phys. Rev. B ...

    work page 2015

  57. [60]

    S. M. Morley, R. P. Campion, K. Horbelt, P. J. King, H. .-U. Habermeier, and B. Leibold, In-plane anisotropic properties of (103)/(013) and 10/spl deg/ YBCO thin films, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 7, 3458 (1997)

    work page 1997

  58. [61]

    Johansson, K

    J. Johansson, K. Cedergren, T. Bauch, and F. Lombardi, Properties of inductance and magnetic penetration depth in (103)-oriented ${\text{YBa}}_{2}{\text{Cu}}_{3}{\text{O}}_{7\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\delta}}$ thin films, Phys. Rev. B 79, 214513 (2009)

    work page 2009

  59. [62]

    Tafuri, F

    F. Tafuri, F. Miletto Granozio, F. Carillo, A. Di Chiara, K. Verbist, and G. Van Tendeloo, Microstructure and Josephson phenomenology in 45\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{} tilt and twist ${\mathrm{YBa}}_{2}{\mathrm{Cu}}_{3}{\mathrm{O}}_{7\mathrm{\ensuremath{- }}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\delta}}}$ artificial grain boundaries, Phys. Rev. B 59, 11523 (1999)

    work page 1999

  60. [63]

    R. W. . James, The Optical Principles of the Diffraction of X-Rays (Ox Bow Press, 1982)

    work page 1982

  61. [64]

    aps-inline-formula

    V. K. Malik et al., Pulsed laser deposition growth of heteroepitaxial YBa<span class="aps-inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><msub><mrow></mrow><mn>2</mn></msub></math></span>Cu< span class="aps-inline-formula"><math xmlns="http…, Phys. Rev. B 85, 054514 (2012)

    work page 1998

  62. [65]

    Wang et al., Designing antiphase boundaries by atomic control of heterointerfaces, Proc

    Z. Wang et al., Designing antiphase boundaries by atomic control of heterointerfaces, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115, 9485 (2018)

    work page 2018

  63. [66]

    aps-inline-formula

    A. Hoffmann, S. G. E. Te Velthuis, Z. Sefrioui, J. Santamaría, M. R. Fitzsimmons, S. Park, and M. Varela, Suppressed magnetization in <span class="aps-inline-formula"><math 30 xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><msub><mi>La</mi><mn>0.7</mn></msub><msub><mi>Ca </mi><mn>0.3</mn></msub><msub><mi>MnO</mi><mn>3</mn></msub><mo>∕</...

    work page 1998

  64. [68]

    Varela, A

    M. Varela, A. R. Lupini, S. J. Pennycook, Z. Sefrioui, and J. Santamaria, Nanoscale analysis of YBa2Cu3O7-x/La 0.67Ca0.33MnO3 interfaces, Solid. State. Electron. 47, 2245 (2003)

    work page 2003

  65. [69]

    Y. P. Ivanov, S. Soltan, J. Albrecht, E. Goering, G. Schütz, Z. Zhang, and A. Chuvilin, The Route to Supercurrent Transparent Ferromagnetic Barriers in Superconducting Matrix, ACS Nano 13, 5655 (2019)

    work page 2019

  66. [70]

    C. J. Jou and J. Washburn, Formation of coherent twins in YBa2Cu3O7–δ superconductors, Journal of Materials Research 1989 4:4 4, 795 (2011)

    work page 1989

  67. [71]

    Rouco, A

    V. Rouco, A. Palau, R. Guzman, J. Gazquez, M. Coll, X. Obradors, and T. Puig, Role of twin boundaries on vortex pinning of CSD YBCO nanocomposites, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 27, 125009 (2014)

    work page 2014

  68. [72]

    Zhang, N

    H. Zhang, N. Gauquelin, G. A. Botton, and J. Y. T. Wei, Attenuation of superconductivity in manganite/cuprate heterostructures by epitaxially-induced CuO intergrowths, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, (2013)

    work page 2013

  69. [73]

    Llordés et al., Nanoscale strain-induced pair suppression as a vortex-pinning mechanism in high-temperature superconductors, Nature Materials 2012 11:4 11, 329 (2012)

    A. Llordés et al., Nanoscale strain-induced pair suppression as a vortex-pinning mechanism in high-temperature superconductors, Nature Materials 2012 11:4 11, 329 (2012)

    work page 2012

  70. [74]

    Suzuki, H

    Y. Suzuki, H. Y. Hwang, S. W. Cheong, and R. B. Van Dover, The role of strain in magnetic anisotropy of manganite thin films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 140 (1997)

    work page 1997

  71. [75]

    Bhosle, J

    V. Bhosle, J. T. Prater, and J. Narayan, Anisotropic magnetic properties in [110] oriented epitaxial La0.7 Sr0.3 Mn O3 films on (0001) sapphire, J. Appl. Phys. 102, 13527 (2007)

    work page 2007

  72. [76]

    Steenbeck, R

    K. Steenbeck, R. Hiergeist, A. Revcolevschi, and L. Pinsard-Gaudart, Magnetic Anisotropy in La0.7(Sr,Ca)0.3MnO3 Epitaxial Thin Films And Crystals, MRS Online Proceedings Library 562, 57 (1999)

    work page 1999

  73. [77]

    S. S. Kalarickal, P. Krivosik, M. Wu, C. E. Patton, M. L. Schneider, P. Kabos, T. J. Silva, and J. P. Nibarger, Ferromagnetic resonance linewidth in metallic thin films: Comparison of measurement methods, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 093909 (2006)

    work page 2006

  74. [78]

    Harder, Z

    M. Harder, Z. X. Cao, Y. S. Gui, X. L. Fan, and C.-M. Hu, Analysis of the line shape of electrically detected ferromagnetic resonance, Phys. Rev. B 84, 54423 (2011)

    work page 2011

  75. [79]

    G. A. M. Alexander G. Gurevich, Magnetization Oscillations and Waves, 1st Editio (CRC Press, 1996)

    work page 1996

  76. [80]

    Haspot, P

    V. Haspot, P. Noël, J.-P. Attané, L. Vila, M. Bibes, A. Anane, and A. Barthélémy, Temperature dependence of the Gilbert damping of ${\mathrm{La}}_{0.7}{\mathrm{Sr}}_{0.3}{\mathrm{MnO}}_{3}$ thin films, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 024406 (2022)

    work page 2022

  77. [81]

    C. Bell, S. Milikisyants, M. Huber, and J. Aarts, Spin dynamics in a superconductor- ferromagnet proximity system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 1 (2008)

    work page 2008

  78. [82]

    Behner, K

    H. Behner, K. Rührnschopf, G. Wedler, and W. Rauch, Surface reactions and long time stability of YBCO thin films, Physica C Supercond. 208, 419 (1993). 31

    work page 1993

  79. [83]

    Wang et al., Thickness and temperature-dependent damping in La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 epitaxial films, Appl

    Y. Wang et al., Thickness and temperature-dependent damping in La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 epitaxial films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, (2023)

    work page 2023

  80. [84]

    Kashiwaya and Y

    S. Kashiwaya and Y. Tanaka, Theory for tunneling spectroscopy of anisotropic superconductors, Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 53, 2667 (1996)

    work page 1996

Showing first 80 references.