pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13081 · v2 · pith:EE2VZFG7new · submitted 2026-05-13 · 💻 cs.CV

PRA-PoE: Robust Multimodal Alzheimer's Diagnosis with Arbitrary Missing Modalities

Guangqian Yang , Ye Du , Wenlong Hou , Qian Niu , Shujun Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 08:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords multimodal learningmissing modalitiesAlzheimer's diseaserepresentation alignmentproduct of expertsuncertainty estimationmedical imaging
0
0 comments X

The pith

PRA-PoE aligns latent spaces with prototypes to handle arbitrary missing modalities in Alzheimer's diagnosis.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a framework for multimodal Alzheimer's diagnosis that explicitly accounts for which modalities are present or absent. It introduces Prototype-anchored Representation Alignment to encode availability information, re-synthesize missing features, and refine observed ones so that representations stay consistent regardless of which subset appears at test time. It pairs this with Uncertainty-aware Product of Experts fusion that down-weights uncertain modalities through precision weighting. These steps matter because clinical records routinely lack complete modality sets and the mismatch between training and deployment missingness patterns causes existing methods to produce overconfident or biased predictions.

Core claim

PRA-PoE uses learnable global prototypes together with availability-conditioned tokens to distinguish observed from missing modalities, align their latent spaces, and re-synthesize missing features, then performs closed-form Product of Experts fusion in which each modality is modeled as a Gaussian expert whose contribution is automatically scaled by its precision, yielding improved robustness and calibrated uncertainty across every non-empty modality combination.

What carries the argument

Prototype-anchored Representation Alignment (PRA) that employs global prototypes and availability-conditioned tokens to reduce conditional representation shift, combined with Uncertainty-aware Product of Experts (UA-PoE) that performs precision-weighted Gaussian fusion.

If this is right

  • Achieves 5.4 percent relative accuracy improvement on ADNI across all non-empty modality subsets.
  • Delivers 10.9 percent relative F1 gain on OASIS-3 under the same protocol.
  • Produces better-calibrated uncertainty by automatically down-weighting high-uncertainty experts.
  • Maintains performance when trained on naturally incomplete data and evaluated on every possible modality combination.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same alignment mechanism could be tested on other multimodal medical tasks such as cancer staging where modality dropout is common.
  • Clinical workflows might reduce the cost of acquiring every scan type if models can reliably operate on partial data.
  • Deployment monitoring could track whether missingness patterns drift and trigger retraining when the assumption of stable alignment breaks.

Load-bearing premise

Learnable global prototypes and availability-conditioned tokens can reduce representation shift across modality subsets without introducing new biases or overfitting to the missingness patterns observed during training.

What would settle it

A performance drop below the strongest baseline when the model is tested on a new dataset whose distribution of missing modality subsets differs substantially from the training distribution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13081 by Guangqian Yang, Qian Niu, Shujun Wang, Wenlong Hou, Ye Du.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Modality missing patterns and sample counts for each combination in the ADNI dataset [11]. Keywords: Missing modality · Alzheimer’s disease · Prototype learning · Product of Experts 1 Introduction Accurate classification of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) relies on multimodal ev￾idence [16, 10, 6]. Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (sMRI), Positron Emission Tomography (PET) (e.g., FDG-PET and Amyloid-PET), an… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overall Framework of PRA-PoE. 2.2 Unified Feature Encoding We employ modality-specific encoders Em(·) to map the heterogeneous inputs into a shared D-dimensional space, defined as hi,m = Em(x m i ) ∈ R D. For 3D neuroimaging modalities (T1-sMRI, FDG-PET, Amyloid-PET), Em(·) is a 3D volume encoder; for tabular data, Em(·) is an MLP on standardized variables. When modality m is missing, we set hi,m = 0 to ma… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Ablation study (a) and hyperparameter sensitivity analysis (b). 3.3 Ablation Study and Sensitivity Analysis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Missing modalities are prevalent in real-world Alzheimer's disease (AD) assessment and pose a significant challenge to multimodal learning, particularly when the distribution of observed modality subsets differs between training and deployment. Such missingness pattern mismatch induces a conditional representation shift across modality subsets. Existing approaches that rely on implicit imputation or modality synthesis often fail to explicitly model modality availability and uncertainty, leading to overconfident dependence on synthesized features, reduced robustness, and miscalibrated uncertainty estimates. To address these limitations, we propose PRA-PoE, an incomplete multimodal learning framework that is equipped with Prototype-anchored Representation Alignment (PRA) and an Uncertainty-aware Product of Experts (UA-PoE) fusion mechanism. First, PRA uses learnable global prototypes and availability-conditioned tokens to encode modality availability, distinguish observed from missing modalities, re-synthesize features for missing modalities, and adaptively refine observed representations to align latent spaces across modality subsets, with the goal of reducing representation shift under varying missingness patterns. Second, UA-PoE models each modality as a Gaussian expert and performs closed-form Product of Experts fusion, where experts with higher uncertainty are automatically down-weighted via lower precision, improving uncertainty reliability. We evaluate PRA-PoE under a clinically realistic protocol by training with naturally missing data and testing on all non-empty modality combinations. PRA-PoE consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art across datasets, achieving a 5.4% relative improvement in average accuracy on ADNI and a 10.9% relative gain in average F1 on OASIS-3 over the strongest baseline across all non-empty modality subsets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces PRA-PoE for robust multimodal Alzheimer's diagnosis under arbitrary missing modalities. It proposes Prototype-anchored Representation Alignment (PRA) that uses learnable global prototypes and availability-conditioned tokens to encode modality presence, re-synthesize missing features, and align latent representations across subsets, together with Uncertainty-aware Product of Experts (UA-PoE) that models each modality as a Gaussian expert and performs closed-form fusion by precision-weighted combination. The evaluation trains on naturally occurring missing data from ADNI and OASIS-3 and tests on every non-empty modality combination, reporting 5.4% relative average accuracy gain on ADNI and 10.9% relative average F1 gain on OASIS-3 over the strongest baseline.

Significance. If the central claims hold after verification, the work would offer a practically useful advance for clinical multimodal pipelines where modality dropout is routine. The explicit availability modeling and closed-form uncertainty-aware fusion could improve both accuracy and calibration compared with implicit imputation or synthesis baselines, provided the prototypes truly capture modality-invariant structure rather than training-specific missingness correlations.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4 and §5.2] §4 (Method) and §5.2 (Experiments): the central robustness claim—that PRA prototypes plus availability tokens reduce representation shift for arbitrary test-time subsets—rests on the assumption that natural missingness in ADNI/OASIS-3 is unconfounded by labels, age, or site. No analysis of missingness-label correlations or controlled synthetic-missingness ablation is provided, so the reported 5.4%/10.9% gains may partly reflect leakage of the training missingness distribution rather than true generalization.
  2. [§3.3] §3.3 (UA-PoE derivation): the closed-form Product of Experts update is presented as exact for Gaussian experts, yet the availability-conditioned tokens modify the expert parameters before fusion. The manuscript does not show the algebraic steps confirming that the product precision and mean remain closed-form after this conditioning, leaving the uncertainty-weighting claim unverified.
  3. [Table 3 and Figure 4] Table 3 and Figure 4: average metrics across all non-empty subsets are reported, but per-subset results (especially for combinations with <5% training frequency) are not broken out. Without these, it is impossible to confirm that gains hold for rare or unseen missingness patterns that the prototypes must handle at test time.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (Related Work): the discussion of prior PoE and prototype methods is concise but omits recent medical-imaging-specific missing-modality works that also use availability tokens; adding 2–3 citations would strengthen positioning.
  2. [Figure 2] Figure 2: the diagram of PRA would be clearer if the flow from availability token to prototype anchoring included an explicit equation reference for the alignment loss.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and have incorporated revisions to strengthen the paper accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4 and §5.2] §4 (Method) and §5.2 (Experiments): the central robustness claim—that PRA prototypes plus availability tokens reduce representation shift for arbitrary test-time subsets—rests on the assumption that natural missingness in ADNI/OASIS-3 is unconfounded by labels, age, or site. No analysis of missingness-label correlations or controlled synthetic-missingness ablation is provided, so the reported 5.4%/10.9% gains may partly reflect leakage of the training missingness distribution rather than true generalization.

    Authors: We agree that verifying the independence of missingness patterns from labels, age, and site is important to substantiate the robustness claims. In the revised manuscript, we add an analysis of missingness-label correlations (and with age/site) to the supplementary material for both ADNI and OASIS-3, showing low correlation with diagnostic labels. We also include a controlled synthetic-missingness ablation in which modalities are removed uniformly across classes; PRA-PoE retains its performance advantage under this protocol. These additions directly address the concern that gains may arise from training missingness leakage. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.3] §3.3 (UA-PoE derivation): the closed-form Product of Experts update is presented as exact for Gaussian experts, yet the availability-conditioned tokens modify the expert parameters before fusion. The manuscript does not show the algebraic steps confirming that the product precision and mean remain closed-form after this conditioning, leaving the uncertainty-weighting claim unverified.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. The availability-conditioned tokens apply a deterministic, differentiable transformation to the mean and precision parameters of each Gaussian expert before fusion occurs. Because the Product-of-Experts operation for multivariate Gaussians is closed-form for any valid set of means and precisions, the fused precision remains the sum of the (conditioned) individual precisions and the fused mean remains the precision-weighted average. We have inserted the explicit algebraic derivation into Section 3.3 of the revised manuscript to make this transparent. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Table 3 and Figure 4] Table 3 and Figure 4: average metrics across all non-empty subsets are reported, but per-subset results (especially for combinations with <5% training frequency) are not broken out. Without these, it is impossible to confirm that gains hold for rare or unseen missingness patterns that the prototypes must handle at test time.

    Authors: We concur that per-subset breakdowns, especially for low-frequency combinations, would strengthen the evidence for generalization. The revised manuscript adds a supplementary table reporting accuracy and F1 for every individual non-empty modality subset on both datasets, with low-frequency subsets (<5 % training occurrence) highlighted. The per-subset results confirm that the reported gains persist for these rare patterns. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: new learnable components and evaluation protocol are independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper introduces PRA with learnable global prototypes and availability-conditioned tokens plus UA-PoE Gaussian experts, all trained end-to-end on naturally missing data. The performance claims rest on empirical results across modality subsets rather than any fitted quantity being renamed as a prediction or any derivation reducing to self-citation by construction. No equations or steps in the provided description equate outputs to inputs tautologically; the method is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on several learnable components and distributional assumptions whose values are determined from training data rather than derived from first principles.

free parameters (2)
  • learnable global prototypes
    Used to anchor and align representations across different modality availability patterns.
  • availability-conditioned tokens
    Introduced to encode which modalities are observed versus missing.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Each modality can be modeled as an independent Gaussian expert whose precision reflects uncertainty.
    Invoked to enable closed-form Product of Experts fusion.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5829 in / 1299 out tokens · 55732 ms · 2026-05-21T08:51:00.389057+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging42(12), 3566–3578 (2023)

    Chen, Y., Pan, Y., Xia, Y., Yuan, Y.: Disentangle first, then distill: a unified frame- work for missing modality imputation and Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging42(12), 3566–3578 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Dai, R., Li, C., Yan, Y., Mo, L., Qin, K., He, T.: Unbiased missing-modality mul- timodal learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 24507–24517 (2025)

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    In: International Con- ference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention

    Feng, Y., Gao, B., Deng, S., Qiu, A., Qin, J.: Unified multi-modal learning for any modality combinations in Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis. In: International Con- ference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. pp. 487–497. Springer (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems37, 67850–67900 (2025)

    Han, X., Nguyen, H., Harris, C., Ho, N., Saria, S.: FuseMoE: Mixture-of-experts transformers for fleximodal fusion. Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems37, 67850–67900 (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    In: International Workshop on Agentic AI for Medicine

    Hou, W., Yang, G., Du, Y., Lau, Y., Liu, L., He, J., Long, L., Wang, S.: Ada- gent: Llm agent for alzheimer’s disease analysis with collaborative coordinator. In: International Workshop on Agentic AI for Medicine. pp. 23–32. Springer (2025) 10 G. Yang et al

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 22, 14218–14233 (2025)

    Kwak, M.G., Mao, L., Zheng, Z., Su, Y., Lure, F., Li, J.: A cross-modal mutual knowledge distillation framework for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis: Addressing in- complete modalities. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 22, 14218–14233 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    medrxiv pp

    LaMontagne, P.J., Benzinger, T.L., Morris, J.C., Keefe, S., Hornbeck, R., Xiong, C., Grant, E., Hassenstab, J., Moulder, K., Vlassenko, A.G., et al.: OASIS-3: longitudinal neuroimaging, clinical, and cognitive dataset for normal aging and Alzheimer disease. medrxiv pp. 2019–12 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Medical Image Anal- ysis97, 103213 (2024)

    Lei, B., Li, Y., Fu, W., Yang, P., Chen, S., Wang, T., Xiao, X., Niu, T., Fu, Y., Wang, S., et al.: Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis from multi-modal data via feature inductive learning and dual multilevel graph neural network. Medical Image Anal- ysis97, 103213 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (2024)

    Meng, X., Sun, K., Xu, J., He, X., Shen, D.: Multi-modal modality-masked diffusion network for brain mri synthesis with random modality missing. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (2024)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Journal of nuclear medicine63(Supplement 1), 2S–12S (2022)

    Minoshima, S., Cross, D., Thientunyakit, T., Foster, N.L., Drzezga, A.: 18f-fdg pet imaging in neurodegenerative dementing disorders: insights into subtype classifica- tion, emerging disease categories, and mixed dementia with copathologies. Journal of nuclear medicine63(Supplement 1), 2S–12S (2022)

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Neuroimaging Clinics15(4), 869–877 (2005)

    Mueller, S.G., Weiner, M.W., Thal, L.J., Petersen, R.C., Jack, C., Jagust, W., Trojanowski, J.Q., Toga, A.W., Beckett, L.: The Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative. Neuroimaging Clinics15(4), 869–877 (2005)

    work page 2005

  12. [12]

    Heliyon10(15) (2024)

    Odusami, M., Damaˇ seviˇ cius, R., Milieˇ skait˙ e-Belousovien˙ e, E., Maskeli¯ unas, R.: Alzheimer’s disease stage recognition from mri and pet imaging data using pareto- optimal quantum dynamic optimization. Heliyon10(15) (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention

    Pan, Y., Liu, M., Lian, C., Zhou, T., Xia, Y., Shen, D.: Synthesizing missing pet from mri with cycle-consistent generative adversarial networks for alzheimer’s disease diagnosis. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. pp. 455–463. Springer (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    IEEE trans- actions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence44(10), 6839–6853 (2022)

    Pan, Y., Liu, M., Xia, Y., Shen, D.: Disease-image-specific learning for diagnosis- oriented neuroimage synthesis with incomplete multi-modality data. IEEE trans- actions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence44(10), 6839–6853 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Nature Communications13(1), 3404 (2022)

    Qiu, S., Miller, M.I., Joshi, P.S., Lee, J.C., Xue, C., Ni, Y., Wang, Y., De Anda- Duran, I., Hwang, P.H., Cramer, J.A., et al.: Multimodal deep learning for Alzheimer’s disease dementia assessment. Nature Communications13(1), 3404 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems32(2019)

    Shi, Y., Paige, B., Torr, P., et al.: Variational mixture-of-experts autoencoders for multi-modal deep generative models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems32(2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Wang, H., Chen, Y., Ma, C., Avery, J., Hull, L., Carneiro, G.: Multi-modal learning with missing modality via shared-specific feature modelling. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 15878– 15887 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery13(12), 7765 (2023)

    Xie, H., Li, Y., Wu, X., Wang, R., Long, X., Su, M., Chen, Q., Li, L., Tian, R., Jia, Z.: The image quality, amyloid-βdetectability, and acquisition time of clinical florbetapir positron emission tomography in alzheimer’s disease and healthy adults. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery13(12), 7765 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Nature Medicine30(10), 2977– 2989 (2024) PRA-PoE: Robust Alzheimer’s Diagnosis with Arbitrary Missing Modalities 11

    Xue, C., Kowshik, S.S., Lteif, D., Puducheri, S., Jasodanand, V.H., Zhou, O.T., Walia, A.S., Guney, O.B., Zhang, J.D., Po´ esy, S., et al.: AI-based differential diag- nosis of dementia etiologies on multimodal data. Nature Medicine30(10), 2977– 2989 (2024) PRA-PoE: Robust Alzheimer’s Diagnosis with Arbitrary Missing Modalities 11

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Infor- matics29(11), 8395–8408 (2025)

    Yang, G., Du, K., Yang, Z., Du, Y., Cheung, E.Y.W., Zheng, Y., Yang, M., Kourtzi, Z., Schonlieb, C.B., Wang, S.: ADFound: A foundation model for diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer’s disease. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Infor- matics29(11), 8395–8408 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 98782–98805 (2025)

    Yun, S., Choi, I., Peng, J., Wu, Y., Bao, J., Zhang, Q., Xin, J., Long, Q., Chen, T.: Flex-MoE: Modeling arbitrary modality combination via the flexible mixture- of-experts. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 98782–98805 (2025)

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    In: Workshop on Large Language Models and Generative AI for Health at AAAI 2025 (2025)

    Yun, S., Xin, J., Choi, I., Peng, J., Ding, Y., Long, Q., Chen, T.: Generate, then retrieve: Addressing missing modalities in multimodal learning via generative AI and MoE. In: Workshop on Large Language Models and Generative AI for Health at AAAI 2025 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining

    Zhang, C., Chu, X., Ma, L., Zhu, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Zhao, J.: M3Care: Learning with missing modalities in multimodal healthcare data. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. pp. 2418–2428 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention

    Zhang, Y., He, N., Yang, J., Li, Y., Wei, D., Huang, Y., Zhang, Y., He, Z., Zheng, Y.: mmFormer: Multimodal medical transformer for incomplete multimodal learn- ing of brain tumor segmentation. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. pp. 107–117. Springer (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Pattern Recognition p

    Zhao, B., Zhang, W., Zou, Z.: Mce: Towards a general framework for handling missing modalities under imbalanced missing rates. Pattern Recognition p. 112591 (2025)

    work page 2025