pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13626 · v1 · pith:PPPET7F6new · submitted 2026-05-13 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

Thermodynamic Geometry of two-dimensional square-well fluids

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 17:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords thermodynamic geometrysquare-well potentialtwo-dimensional fluidsRuppeiner metricWidom linesR-crossingsupercritical regionphase transitions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Thermodynamic geometry shows that two-dimensional square-well fluids have narrower R-crossing validity in subcritical regions and longer-ranging Widom lines in supercritical regions than three-dimensional fluids.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses a square-well model to explore thermodynamic geometry in two-dimensional fluids and compares it directly to the three-dimensional case. In the subcritical domain, the R-crossing method for determining the Widom line proves valid over a smaller range of conditions in two dimensions. In the supercritical domain, Widom lines including the one defined by the curvature scalar R extend further from the critical point in two-dimensional fluids. This comparison matters for understanding how reduced dimensionality alters the structure of thermodynamic space near and above the critical point.

Core claim

In the subcritical region, the R-crossing method has a narrower range of validity for two-dimensional fluids compared to three-dimensional ones. In the supercritical region, an analysis of different Widom lines, including the R Widom line, shows that for two-dimensional fluids these lines extend further into the supercritical region than their three-dimensional counterparts. A similar behavior is observed for the validity of the Clausius--Clapeyron equation in two-dimensional fluids.

What carries the argument

The Ruppeiner thermodynamic metric and its scalar curvature R, used to define the R-crossing method and R Widom line for locating crossover lines in the phase diagram.

Load-bearing premise

The square-well interaction potential together with the Ruppeiner geometric approach adequately represent the key physical differences between two- and three-dimensional fluid thermodynamics.

What would settle it

Molecular dynamics simulations of 2D square-well fluids demonstrating that the R Widom line does not extend as far into the supercritical region as predicted would falsify the main result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13626 by Jaime Jaramillo-Guti\'errez, Jos\'e Torres-Arenas.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Behavior of critical values as a function of the potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Isotherms of the scalar curvature in the subcritical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Vapor–liquid coexistence line for 2D and 3D square-well [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Isotherms of the scalar curvature in the supercritical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Extremes of the response functions for 2D square-well [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Thermodynamic geometry of two-dimensional fluids has been investigated using a square-well model as a prototype fluid. A comparison with the three-dimensional case is performed in the subcritical and supercritical domains of thermodynamic space. In the subcritical region, it is found that the R-crossing method has a narrower range of validity for two-dimensional fluids compared to three-dimensional ones. On the other hand, in the supercritical region, an analysis of different Widom lines, including the R Widom line, shows that for two-dimensional fluids these lines extend further into the supercritical region than their three-dimensional counterparts. A similar behavior is observed for the validity of the Clausius--Clapeyron equation in two-dimensional fluids.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the thermodynamic geometry of two-dimensional square-well fluids using the Ruppeiner metric. It performs a direct comparison with three-dimensional square-well fluids in both subcritical and supercritical thermodynamic domains, reporting that the R-crossing method has a narrower validity range in 2D subcritical fluids, while Widom lines (including the R Widom line) and the validity of the Clausius-Clapeyron equation extend further into the supercritical region for 2D than for 3D.

Significance. If the central comparisons hold after proper reduced-variable scaling, the work provides concrete evidence of dimensionality effects on thermodynamic curvature scalars and crossover lines in a controlled model fluid. This could inform studies of phase behavior in low-dimensional systems and the robustness of geometric diagnostics like R-crossing.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4 and §5] The 2D-vs-3D contrasts in R-crossing validity (§4, subcritical results) and Widom-line extensions (§5, supercritical analysis) presuppose equivalent reduced temperatures and densities relative to each fluid’s own critical point. The manuscript does not show explicit verification that the critical loci (T_c, ρ_c) were located with the same protocol and precision in both dimensions before scaling; any systematic offset in reduced variables would propagate directly into the curvature scalar R and the reported crossing loci.
  2. [Table 2 / §5] Table 2 (or equivalent data table for Widom lines): the reported extension of the R Widom line and Clausius-Clapeyron validity into the supercritical region lacks quantitative bounds (e.g., maximum reduced temperature T/T_c where the lines remain defined) together with uncertainty estimates from the underlying Monte Carlo or molecular-dynamics runs.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure 3 (R scalar plots): axis labels and color scales should explicitly state whether quantities are in reduced units; the caption does not indicate the precise definition of the Ruppeiner scalar (sign convention and normalization).
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states comparative findings without citing any figure, table, or numerical range; a single sentence referencing the key quantitative result would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript on the thermodynamic geometry of two-dimensional square-well fluids and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions that will be incorporated in the next version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§4 and §5] The 2D-vs-3D contrasts in R-crossing validity (§4, subcritical results) and Widom-line extensions (§5, supercritical analysis) presuppose equivalent reduced temperatures and densities relative to each fluid’s own critical point. The manuscript does not show explicit verification that the critical loci (T_c, ρ_c) were located with the same protocol and precision in both dimensions before scaling; any systematic offset in reduced variables would propagate directly into the curvature scalar R and the reported crossing loci.

    Authors: We thank the referee for emphasizing the need for transparent verification of the critical-point scaling. The critical loci for both the 2D and 3D square-well fluids were in fact determined using the same Monte Carlo protocol (finite-size scaling combined with equation-of-state fitting on identical system sizes and sampling statistics). To make this equivalence explicit, we will insert a new subsection in §3 that reproduces the critical-point location procedure for both dimensions, tabulates the resulting T_c and ρ_c values together with their statistical uncertainties, and confirms that the reduced variables employed in §§4 and 5 are therefore directly comparable. This addition will eliminate any ambiguity about possible systematic offsets in the reported R-crossing and Widom-line loci. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Table 2 / §5] Table 2 (or equivalent data table for Widom lines): the reported extension of the R Widom line and Clausius-Clapeyron validity into the supercritical region lacks quantitative bounds (e.g., maximum reduced temperature T/T_c where the lines remain defined) together with uncertainty estimates from the underlying Monte Carlo or molecular-dynamics runs.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative bounds and error estimates will strengthen the presentation of the supercritical results. We will revise Table 2 to list, for each Widom line (including the R Widom line) and for the Clausius–Clapeyron validity range, the maximum reduced temperature T/T_c at which the line remains defined according to our adopted criteria, together with the associated uncertainties propagated from the Monte Carlo block averages. The text of §5 will be expanded to describe how these bounds were obtained and to compare the 2D versus 3D extensions on this quantitative footing. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper computes the Ruppeiner curvature scalar directly from the Hessian of the thermodynamic potential for the square-well model in two dimensions and performs explicit comparisons to three-dimensional results using reduced variables anchored at each model's own critical point. No reported step fits a parameter to data and then re-labels a closely related quantity as a prediction. The R-crossing method and Widom-line analysis follow from the standard definition of the scalar R without requiring an ansatz or uniqueness theorem imported via self-citation. The central claims rest on direct numerical evaluation rather than any reduction to the paper's own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard square-well potential and the established Ruppeiner thermodynamic geometry framework; no new entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The thermodynamic curvature scalar R derived from the Ruppeiner metric carries information about phase transitions and critical behavior.
    This is the foundational premise of thermodynamic geometry used throughout the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5417 in / 1264 out tokens · 35746 ms · 2026-05-14T17:46:41.720169+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless. Two-dimensional physics. In D. F. Brewer, editor,Progress in Low Temper- ature Physics, volume 7 ofProgress in Low Temperature Physics, pages 371–433. Elsevier, 1978

  2. [2]

    Michael N. Barber. Phase transitions in two dimensions. Physics Reports, 59(4):375–409, 1980. p-6 Thermodynamic Geometry of two-dimensional square-well fluids Fig. 7: Extremes of the response functions for 2D square-well systems. Solid black line, maximum ofα p; dotted red line, maximum ofc p; dashed green line, minimum ofR; and dot- dashed blue line, min...

  3. [3]

    Sanusi Liman, Chieko Totsuji, and Kenji Tsuruta

    Hiroo Totsuji, M. Sanusi Liman, Chieko Totsuji, and Kenji Tsuruta. Thermodynamics of a two-dimensional yukawa fluid.Phys. Rev. E, 70:016405, Jul 2004

  4. [4]

    Quasi-2d liquid 3He.Phys

    Michele Ruggeri, Saverio Moroni, and Massimo Bonin- segni. Quasi-2d liquid 3He.Phys. Rev. Lett., 111:045303, Jul 2013

  5. [5]

    A. K. Geim. Graphene: Status and prospects.Science, 324(5934):1530–1534, 2009

  6. [6]

    Yazyev, and Andras Kis

    Sajedeh Manzeli, Dmitry Ovchinnikov, Diego Pasquier, Oleg V. Yazyev, and Andras Kis. 2d transition metal dichalcogenides.Nature Reviews Materials, 2(8), 2017

  7. [7]

    Xiong-Jun Liu, K. T. Law, and T. K. Ng. Realization of 2d spin-orbit interaction and exotic topological orders in cold atoms.Phys. Rev. Lett., 112:086401, Feb 2014

  8. [8]

    Thermodynamic properties of a two-dimensional square-well fluid.Pramana, 23(1):79– 90, 1984

    BM Mishra and SK Sinha. Thermodynamic properties of a two-dimensional square-well fluid.Pramana, 23(1):79– 90, 1984

  9. [9]

    Vapor–liquid equilibria of the two-dimensional lennard-jones fluid (s).Journal of chemical physics, 94(8):5663–5668, 1991

    Berend Smit and Daan Frenkel. Vapor–liquid equilibria of the two-dimensional lennard-jones fluid (s).Journal of chemical physics, 94(8):5663–5668, 1991

  10. [10]

    Monte carlo simulation of phase equilibria for the two-dimensional lennard-jones fluid in the gibbs ensemble.The Journal of chemical physics, 92(9):5463–5466, 1990

    Rajiv R Singh, Kenneth S Pitzer, Juan J de Pablo, and John M Prausnitz. Monte carlo simulation of phase equilibria for the two-dimensional lennard-jones fluid in the gibbs ensemble.The Journal of chemical physics, 92(9):5463–5466, 1990

  11. [11]

    Low-dimensional quantum devices.Reports Fig

    C G Smith. Low-dimensional quantum devices.Reports Fig. 8: Natural logarithm of the pressure associated with the extreme values of the response functions. From top to bottom: global fit of the response functions in the neighborhood of the critical point; maximum ofC P ; minimum ofR; maximum of αp; and minimum ofc s. on Progress in Physics, 59(2):235, feb 1996

  12. [12]

    Predicting adsorption isotherms using a two-dimensional statistical associating fluid the- ory.The Journal of chemical physics, 126(7), 2007

    Alejandro Martinez, Martin Castro, Clare McCabe, and Alejandro Gil-Villegas. Predicting adsorption isotherms using a two-dimensional statistical associating fluid the- ory.The Journal of chemical physics, 126(7), 2007

  13. [13]

    Horst L V¨ ortler, Katja Sch¨ afer, and William R Smith. Simulation of chemical potentials and phase equilib- ria in two-and three-dimensional square-well fluids: fi- nite size effects.The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 112(15):4656–4661, 2008

  14. [14]

    Molecular thermodynamics of adsorption using discrete-potential systems.Oil & Gas Science and Technology-Revue de l’IFP, 63(3):329–341, 2008

    G Jim´ enez, S Santill´ an, C Avenda˜ no, M Castro, and A Gil-Villegas. Molecular thermodynamics of adsorption using discrete-potential systems.Oil & Gas Science and Technology-Revue de l’IFP, 63(3):329–341, 2008

  15. [15]

    Phase behavior of a two-dimensional and confined in slit- like pores square-shoulder, square-well fluid.The Journal of chemical physics, 132(16), 2010

    W R˙ zysko, A Patrykiejew, S Soko lowski, and O Pizio. Phase behavior of a two-dimensional and confined in slit- like pores square-shoulder, square-well fluid.The Journal of chemical physics, 132(16), 2010

  16. [16]

    Liquid-vapor equilibrium and interfacial properties of square wells in two dimensions.The Journal of chemical physics, 138(4), 2013

    Julio C Armas-P´ erez, Jacqueline Quintana-H, and Gus- tavo A Chapela. Liquid-vapor equilibrium and interfacial properties of square wells in two dimensions.The Journal of chemical physics, 138(4), 2013

  17. [17]

    Thermodynamics of two-dimensional molecular fluids: Discrete perturbation theory and p-7 Jaramillo-Guti´ errezet al

    Francisco G´ amez, Lucas F Rodr´ ıguez-Almeida, and V´ ıctor M Trejos. Thermodynamics of two-dimensional molecular fluids: Discrete perturbation theory and p-7 Jaramillo-Guti´ errezet al. monte carlo simulations.Journal of Molecular Liquids, 300:112293, 2020

  18. [18]

    Weinhold

    F. Weinhold. Metric geometry of equilibrium thermody- namics.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 63(6):2479– 2483, 09 1975

  19. [19]

    Thermodynamics: A riemannian geo- metric model.Phys

    George Ruppeiner. Thermodynamics: A riemannian geo- metric model.Phys. Rev. A, 20:1608–1613, Oct 1979

  20. [20]

    Geometrothermodynamics.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 48(1):013506, 01 2007

    Hernando Quevedo. Geometrothermodynamics.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 48(1):013506, 01 2007

  21. [21]

    Riemannian geometry in thermody- namic fluctuation theory.Rev

    George Ruppeiner. Riemannian geometry in thermody- namic fluctuation theory.Rev. Mod. Phys., 67:605–659, Jul 1995

  22. [22]

    L´ opez-Pic´ on, and Jos´ e Torres-Arenas

    Jaime Jaramillo-Guti´ errez, J.˜L. L´ opez-Pic´ on, and Jos´ e Torres-Arenas. Subcritical and supercritical thermody- namic geometry of mie fluids.Journal of Molecular Liq- uids, 347:118395, 2022

  23. [23]

    Dy- namics of phase separation in two-dimensional fluids: spinodal decomposition.Physical Review A, 27(4):2152, 1983

    SW Koch, Rashmi C Desai, and Farid F Abraham. Dy- namics of phase separation in two-dimensional fluids: spinodal decomposition.Physical Review A, 27(4):2152, 1983

  24. [24]

    A simple approach to the equilibrium statistical mechanics of two-dimensional fluids.The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics, 64(5):1941–1947, 1976

    Frank C Andrews. A simple approach to the equilibrium statistical mechanics of two-dimensional fluids.The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics, 64(5):1941–1947, 1976

  25. [25]

    CRC Press, 2006

    Antal J´ akli and Alfred Saupe.One-and two-dimensional fluids: properties of smectic, lamellar and columnar liquid crystals. CRC Press, 2006

  26. [26]

    The square-well fluid: A thermodynamic geo- metric view.Journal of Molecular Liquids, 368:120607, 2022

    JL L´ opez-Pic´ on, LF Escamilla-Herrera, and Jos´ e Torres- Arenas. The square-well fluid: A thermodynamic geo- metric view.Journal of Molecular Liquids, 368:120607, 2022

  27. [27]

    Semiclassical ther- modynamic geometry.Physical Review E, 109(6):064145, 2024

    LF Escamilla-Herrera, JL L´ opez-Pic´ on, Jos´ e Torres- Arenas, and Alejandro Gil-Villegas. Semiclassical ther- modynamic geometry.Physical Review E, 109(6):064145, 2024

  28. [28]

    Thermodynamic curvature from the critical point to the triple point.Physical Review E, 86(2):021130, 2012

    George Ruppeiner. Thermodynamic curvature from the critical point to the triple point.Physical Review E, 86(2):021130, 2012

  29. [29]

    Riemannian ge- ometry study of vapor-liquid phase equilibria and super- critical behavior of the lennard-jones fluid.Physical Re- view E, 85(3):031201, mar 2012

    Helge-Otmar May and Peter Mausbach. Riemannian ge- ometry study of vapor-liquid phase equilibria and super- critical behavior of the lennard-jones fluid.Physical Re- view E, 85(3):031201, mar 2012

  30. [30]

    Thermodynamic curvature for attractive and repulsive intermolecular forces.Physical Review E, 88(3):032123, 2013

    Helge-Otmar May, Peter Mausbach, and George Rup- peiner. Thermodynamic curvature for attractive and repulsive intermolecular forces.Physical Review E, 88(3):032123, 2013

  31. [31]

    Thermodynamic geometry, phase transitions and the widom line.Physical Review E, 86(5):052103, 2012

    George Ruppeiner, Anurag Sahay, Tapobrata Sarkar, and Gautam Sengupta. Thermodynamic geometry, phase transitions and the widom line.Physical Review E, 86(5):052103, 2012

  32. [32]

    L´ opez-Pic´ on, and Jos´ e Torres-Arenas

    Jaime Jaramillo-Guti´ errez, J.˜L. L´ opez-Pic´ on, and Jos´ e Torres-Arenas. R-crossing method applied to fluids in- teracting through variable range potentials.Journal of Molecular Liquids, 295:111625, 2019

  33. [33]

    L´ opez-Pic´ on, and Jos´ e Torres-Arenas

    Jaime Jaramillo-Guti´ errez, J.˜L. L´ opez-Pic´ on, and Jos´ e Torres-Arenas. Thermodynamic geometry for binary mix- tures: A constrained approach.Journal of Molecular Liq- uids, 319:114213, 2020

  34. [34]

    T. Speck. Entropy production and fluctuation theorems for active matter.Physical Review E, 86(5):052103, 2012

  35. [35]

    Phase equilibria and critical behavior of square-well fluids of variable width by gibbs ensemble monte carlo simulation.The Journal of chemical physics, 96(3):2296–2305, 1992

    Lourdes Vega, Enrique de Miguel, Luis F Rull, George Jackson, and Ian A McLure. Phase equilibria and critical behavior of square-well fluids of variable width by gibbs ensemble monte carlo simulation.The Journal of chemical physics, 96(3):2296–2305, 1992

  36. [36]

    Gerassimos Orkoulas and Athanassios Z Panagiotopou- los. Phase behavior of the restricted primitive model and square-well fluids from monte carlo simulations in the grand canonical ensemble.The Journal of chemical physics, 110(3):1581–1590, 1999

  37. [37]

    Phase behavior of short- range square-well model.The Journal of chemical physics, 122(18), 2005

    DL Pagan and JD Gunton. Phase behavior of short- range square-well model.The Journal of chemical physics, 122(18), 2005

  38. [38]

    Vapor-liquid equilibrium and critical behavior of the square-well fluid of variable range: A theoretical study.The Journal of chemical physics, 123(23), 2005

    Elisabeth Sch¨ oll-Paschinger, Ana Laura Benavides, and Ramon Casta˜ neda-Priego. Vapor-liquid equilibrium and critical behavior of the square-well fluid of variable range: A theoretical study.The Journal of chemical physics, 123(23), 2005

  39. [39]

    Accurate and precise determination of critical properties from gibbs ensemble monte carlo sim- ulations.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 143(11), 2015

    Mohammadhasan Dinpajooh, Peng Bai, Douglas A Allan, and J Ilja Siepmann. Accurate and precise determination of critical properties from gibbs ensemble monte carlo sim- ulations.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 143(11), 2015

  40. [40]

    Vapor-liquid coexistence in 2d square-well fluid with variable range of attraction: Monte carlo simulation study.The Journal of chemical physics, 137(22), 2012

    Wojciech R˙ zysko and Andrij Trokhymchuk. Vapor-liquid coexistence in 2d square-well fluid with variable range of attraction: Monte carlo simulation study.The Journal of chemical physics, 137(22), 2012

  41. [41]

    Common behavior of the critical properties of the 2d and 3d square-well fluids.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 139(16), 2013

    Yuri Reyes, C´ esar A Flores-Sandoval, and Pedro Orea. Common behavior of the critical properties of the 2d and 3d square-well fluids.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 139(16), 2013

  42. [42]

    B. H. Patel, H. Docherty, Szabolcs Varga, Amparo Galindo, and G. C. Maitland. Generalized equation of state for square-well potentials of variable range.Molec- ular Physics, 103(1):129–139, 2005

  43. [43]

    N. F. Carnahan and K. E. Starling. Equation of state for nonattracting rigid spheres.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 51(2):635–636, 1969

  44. [44]

    V. M. Trejos, A. Santos, and F. G´ amez. Vapor–liquid equilibrium and equation of state of two-dimensional flu- ids from a discrete perturbation theory.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 148(19):194505, 2018

  45. [45]

    Virial expansion and liquid– vapor critical points of high dimension classical fluids.The Journal of chemical physics, 110(5):2734–2735, 1999

    KK Mon and JK Percus. Virial expansion and liquid– vapor critical points of high dimension classical fluids.The Journal of chemical physics, 110(5):2734–2735, 1999

  46. [46]

    Thermodynamic properties of low-dimensional (d <3) lennard-jones fluids.Journal of Molecular Liquids, 429:127529, 2025

    Simon Homes, Peter Mausbach, Monika Thol, Isabel Nitzke, and Jadran Vrabec. Thermodynamic properties of low-dimensional (d <3) lennard-jones fluids.Journal of Molecular Liquids, 429:127529, 2025. p-8