pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13949 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Spin Demographics of Active Supermassive Black Holes: Updated Estimates from X-ray reflection and Future opportunities

Julia M. Sisk-Reynes , Christopher S. Reynolds , James H. Matthews , Dominic J. Walton , Joanna M. Piotrowska , James F. Steiner , Javier A. Garcia , Angelo Ricarte
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 05:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords supermassive black holesblack hole spinX-ray reflectionEddington ratioactive galactic nucleiSMBH growthcosmological simulationsNewAthena
0
0 comments X

The pith

Updated compilation of supermassive black hole spins from X-ray reflection shows no clear correlation with accretion rates.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Supermassive black holes grow via accretion and mergers, with their spin distributions recording the relative roles of coherent accretion, chaotic accretion, and mergers. This review assembles an updated set of spin values measured through X-ray reflection in active galactic nuclei and pairs each with redshift, Eddington ratio, and X-ray luminosity. Across the sample the authors see no obvious link between spin and the Eddington-scaled accretion rate. They note that the heterogeneous nature of the measurements—different selection effects, analysis techniques, and data quality—limits direct tests of semi-analytic models and cosmological simulations. The paper closes by pointing to the NewAthena observatory and hierarchical Bayesian population methods as routes to tighter constraints on growth histories.

Core claim

The paper compiles reflection-based spin measurements for active supermassive black holes together with ancillary quantities including redshift, Eddington ratio, and X-ray luminosity. It reports no apparent correlation between black hole spin and the Eddington-scaled accretion rate, while stating that formal statistical tests lie beyond the scope of the review. The work examines the difficulties of using this mixed literature sample to confront predictions from semi-analytic models and cosmological simulations, and it outlines the improved prospects expected from the NewAthena X-ray observatory together with hierarchical Bayesian inference applied to future mass-spin populations.

What carries the argument

The heterogeneous literature sample of X-ray reflection spin measurements, assembled with associated Eddington ratios to search for demographic trends.

If this is right

  • The current heterogeneous sample cannot yet provide strong tests of specific SMBH growth channels predicted by simulations.
  • A more uniform observational sample is required before mass-spin trends can be used to discriminate between coherent and chaotic accretion scenarios.
  • NewAthena will deliver higher-quality reflection spectra for a larger number of active black holes.
  • Hierarchical Bayesian population inference offers a statistical framework to extract trends once sample size and uniformity improve.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future uniform samples could distinguish whether spin distributions favor prolonged aligned accretion or random chaotic episodes.
  • Spin demographics may eventually be combined with galaxy merger rates to test joint models of black-hole and host-galaxy co-evolution.
  • Selection biases in the present X-ray sample may be masking weak underlying correlations that only larger, volume-limited surveys will reveal.

Load-bearing premise

A mixed collection of spin measurements drawn from many different studies can still reveal population-level trends in supermassive black hole growth despite varying selection and analysis choices.

What would settle it

A uniformly selected sample of several dozen spin measurements that displays a statistically significant correlation (or anti-correlation) with Eddington ratio would contradict the reported absence of an obvious trend.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13949 by Angelo Ricarte, Christopher S. Reynolds, Dominic J. Walton, James F. Steiner, James H. Matthews, Javier A. Garcia, Joanna M. Piotrowska, Julia M. Sisk-Reynes.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Observed SMBH mass–spin plane with reflection-inferred spins compiled from published literature (data listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Black hole spin vs. intrinsic (rest-frame) X-ray flux for the full sample of accreting low-mass AGN and SMBHs with reflection-inferred spins. The intrinsic fluxes were estimated using the X-ray luminosity values listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows no obvious correlation between spin and Eddington ratio for the full sample. This result does not provide clear observational support for models claiming an Eddington-ratio dependent equilibrium spin (e.g., [15]). However, SMBHs need not be at the equilibrium spin for a given Eddington ratio if the Eddington ratio fluctuates on short timescales. Ref. [18] found a low universal equilibrium spin of a ∗… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Black hole spin versus intrinsic (absorption-corrected) X-ray luminosity (2–10 keV) for the full sample of accreting low-mass AGN and SMBHs with reflection-inferred spins. Where available, 1σ statistical uncertainties on the X-ray luminosity from the literature are considered; otherwise, statistical uncertainties of ±20% are considered. 3. Future Prospects: A Decisive Test of Observed Mass–Spin Trends with… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Understanding the growth of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) requires observational constraints on how their angular momentum (or spin) varies with mass, since the relative importance of coherent accretion, chaotic accretion, and mergers will be reflected in SMBH spin populations. Here we present an updated compilation of reflection-based SMBH spin measurements from the literature and assemble a set of ancillary quantities of interest for each SMBH (including redshift, Eddington ratio, and X-ray luminosity). No obvious apparent correlation between the Eddington-scaled accretion rate and the black hole spin is seen, noting that formal statistical tests are beyond the scope of this review. We discuss the limitations of using this heterogeneous mass--spin sample to test predictions of SMBH growth from semi-analytic models and cosmological simulations, emphasizing the need for a more uniform sample. We then highlight the encouraging prospects enabled by the next-generation NewAthena X-ray flagship observatory. Finally, we summarize how hierarchical Bayesian population inference applied to observed SMBH mass--spin populations will constitute a powerful framework for confirming tentative mass--spin trends in future samples.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript compiles updated supermassive black hole spin measurements from X-ray reflection spectroscopy in the literature, assembles ancillary quantities including redshift, Eddington ratio, and X-ray luminosity for each source, and reports no obvious apparent correlation between Eddington-scaled accretion rate and black hole spin based on visual inspection. It discusses limitations of the heterogeneous sample for testing SMBH growth models from semi-analytic and simulation predictions, highlights prospects with the NewAthena observatory, and notes the potential of hierarchical Bayesian population inference for future samples.

Significance. If the compilation accurately reflects the literature and the reported lack of correlation withstands quantitative scrutiny, the work provides a useful reference point for current spin demographics and underscores the need for uniform samples to distinguish coherent versus chaotic accretion and merger contributions to SMBH growth. The forward-looking discussion of next-generation X-ray facilities and advanced statistical frameworks adds planning value for the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central statement that no obvious correlation is seen rests on visual inspection of the compiled sample without any quantitative statistical measure, error propagation, or assessment of measurement uncertainties in spins and Eddington ratios; this is load-bearing for the observational claim given the acknowledged heterogeneity.
  2. [Discussion of limitations] The section discussing limitations of the heterogeneous sample: while selection effects, varying S/N, modeling assumptions, and parent populations are noted as caveats, no quantitative propagation or forward-modeling of these systematics is provided to evaluate whether they could artifactually suppress a true correlation or induce the reported null result.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed report. We address each major comment below and indicate planned revisions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central statement that no obvious correlation is seen rests on visual inspection of the compiled sample without any quantitative statistical measure, error propagation, or assessment of measurement uncertainties in spins and Eddington ratios; this is load-bearing for the observational claim given the acknowledged heterogeneity.

    Authors: We agree that the assessment relies on visual inspection, consistent with the manuscript's explicit statement that formal statistical tests are beyond the scope of this review. We will revise the abstract to describe the assessment more precisely as a qualitative visual inspection of the heterogeneous sample and to underscore the role of measurement uncertainties and selection effects in limiting stronger claims. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion of limitations] The section discussing limitations of the heterogeneous sample: while selection effects, varying S/N, modeling assumptions, and parent populations are noted as caveats, no quantitative propagation or forward-modeling of these systematics is provided to evaluate whether they could artifactually suppress a true correlation or induce the reported null result.

    Authors: We acknowledge that quantitative forward-modeling of these systematics would help evaluate their potential impact on the reported null result. However, such an analysis requires a dedicated simulation study that lies outside the scope of this literature compilation and review. We will expand the limitations section to discuss this gap more explicitly and to stress the need for future work incorporating such modeling. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Quantitative forward-modeling or error propagation of selection effects, S/N variations, and modeling assumptions to assess their influence on the observed spin-accretion correlation

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in descriptive literature compilation

full rationale

The paper compiles existing reflection-based SMBH spin measurements and ancillary quantities from the external literature, then visually notes the lack of an obvious correlation with Eddington ratio while explicitly stating that formal statistical tests lie beyond its scope. No new equations, parameter fits, or derivations are performed that could reduce a claimed prediction to an input by construction. Self-citations are limited to prior observational works and do not bear the load of any uniqueness theorem or ansatz. The discussion of sample limitations and future NewAthena prospects is forward-looking and does not rely on self-referential closure. This is a standard observational review whose central statements remain independent of its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review rests on the validity of prior X-ray reflection spin measurements published in the cited literature; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption X-ray reflection spectroscopy can reliably extract black hole spin from iron-line profiles under standard thin-disk assumptions
    Invoked implicitly when treating published spin values as inputs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5528 in / 1155 out tokens · 44365 ms · 2026-05-15T05:31:49.542302+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

136 extracted references · 136 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The four laws of black hole mechanics.Commun

    Bardeen, J.M, Carter, B.; Hawking, S.W. The four laws of black hole mechanics.Commun. Math. Phys.1973,31, 161–170

    work page 1973

  2. [2]

    Floating Orbits, Superradiant Scattering and the Black-hole Bomb.Nature1972,238, 211–212

    Press, W.H.; Teukolsky, S.A. Floating Orbits, Superradiant Scattering and the Black-hole Bomb.Nature1972,238, 211–212

    work page

  3. [3]

    Energy and angular momentum flow into a black hole.Commun

    Hawking, S.W.; Hartle, J.B. Energy and angular momentum flow into a black hole.Commun. Math. Phys.1972,27, 283–290

    work page 1972

  4. [4]

    Disk-Accretion onto a Black Hole

    Thorne, K.S. Disk-Accretion onto a Black Hole. II. Evolution of the Hole.Astrophys. J.1974,191, 507–520

    work page 1974

  5. [5]

    Observational Constraints on Black Hole Spin.Annu

    Reynolds, C.S. Observational Constraints on Black Hole Spin.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.2021,59, 117–154

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    The Distribution and Cosmic Evolution of Massive Black Hole Spins.Astrophys

    Volonteri, M.; Madau, P .; Quataert, E.; Rees, M.J. The Distribution and Cosmic Evolution of Massive Black Hole Spins.Astrophys. J.2005,620, 69–77

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    Sesana, A.; Barausse, E.; Dotti, M.; Rossi, E. M. Linking the Spin Evolution of Massive Black Holes to Galaxy Kinematics.Astrophys. J.2014,794, 104

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    On the Orientation and Magnitude of the Black Hole Spin in Galactic Nuclei.Astrophys

    Dotti, M.; Colpi, M.; Pallini, S.; Perego, A.; Volonteri, M. On the Orientation and Magnitude of the Black Hole Spin in Galactic Nuclei.Astrophys. J.2013,762, 68

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    The evolution of black hole mass and spin in active galactic nuclei.Mon

    King, A.; Pringle, J.E.; Hofmann, J.A. The evolution of black hole mass and spin in active galactic nuclei.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2008,385, 1621–1627

    work page 2008

  10. [10]

    Spin evolution and feedback of supermassive black holes in cosmological simulations.Mon

    Bustamante, S.; Springel, V . Spin evolution and feedback of supermassive black holes in cosmological simulations.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2019,490, 4133–4153

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    A.; Peirani, S.; Piotrowska, J

    Beckmann, R.; Dubois, Y.; Volonteri, M.; Dong-Paez, C. A.; Peirani, S.; Piotrowska, J. M.; Martin, G.; Kraljic, K.; Devriendt, J.; Pichon, C.; Yi, S. K. Black hole spin evolution across cosmic time from the NEWHORIZON simulation.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2025,536, 1838–1856

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes.Mon

    Blandford, R.D.; Znajek, R.L. Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.1977,179, 433–456

    work page 1977

  13. [13]

    Astrophys

    Tchekhovskoy, A.; Narayan, R.; McKinney, J.C.Black Hole Spin and The Radio Loud/Quiet Dichotomy of Active Galactic Nuclei. Astrophys. J.2010,711, 50–63

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    Efficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole.Mon

    Tchekhovskoy, A.; Narayan, R.; McKinney, J.C. Efficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2011,418, L79–L83

    work page 2011

  15. [15]

    Recipes for Jet Feedback and Spin Evolution of Black Holes with Strongly Magnetized Super-Eddington Accretion Disks.Astrophys

    Ricarte, A.; Narayan, R.; Curd, B. Recipes for Jet Feedback and Spin Evolution of Black Holes with Strongly Magnetized Super-Eddington Accretion Disks.Astrophys. J. Lett.2023,954, L22

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Rapid black hole spin-down by thick magnetically arrested disks

    Lowell, B.; Jacquemin-Ide, J.; Tchekhovskoy, A.; Duncan, A. Rapid black hole spin-down by thick magnetically arrested disks. Astrophys. J.2024,960, 82

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Ricarte, A.; Natarajan, P .; Narayan, R.; Palumbo, D. C. M. Multimessenger Probes of Supermassive Black Hole Spin Evolution. Astrophys. J.2025,980, 136

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Evidence for low universal equilibrium black hole spin in luminous magnetically arrested disks.Phys

    Lowell, B.; Jacquemin-Ide, J.; Liska, M.; Tchekhovskoy, A. Evidence for low universal equilibrium black hole spin in luminous magnetically arrested disks.Phys. Rev. D2025,112, 123023

    work page

  19. [19]

    Bridging Scales in Black Hole Accretion and Feedback: Subgrid Prescription from First Principles.arXiv2026, arXiv:2602.15560

    Cho, H.; Prather, B.S.; Narayan, R.; Su, K-Y.; Ricarte, A.; Natarajan, P .; Porras-Valverde, A.P . Bridging Scales in Black Hole Accretion and Feedback: Subgrid Prescription from First Principles.arXiv2026, arXiv:2602.15560

    work page arXiv

  20. [21]

    Supermassive black hole spin evolution in cosmological simulations with OPENGAD- GET3.Astron

    Sala, L.; Valentini, M.; Biffi, V .; Dolag, K. Supermassive black hole spin evolution in cosmological simulations with OPENGAD- GET3.Astron. Astrophys.2024,685, A92

    work page 2024

  21. [22]

    Black holes in binary systems

    Shakura, N.I.; Sunyaev, R.A. Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance.Astron. Astrophys.1973,24, 337–355

    work page 1973

  22. [23]

    Astrophysics of black holes

    Novikov, I.D.; Thorne, K.S. Astrophysics of black holes. InBlack Holes (Les Astres Occlus); Gordon and Breach Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1973; pp. 343–450

    work page 1973

  23. [24]

    Spin properties of supermassive black holes with powerful outflows.Mon

    Daly, R.A. Spin properties of supermassive black holes with powerful outflows.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett.2016,458, L24–L28

    work page 2016

  24. [25]

    On Spin dependence of the Fundamental Plane of black hole activity.Mon

    Unal, C.; Loeb, A. On Spin dependence of the Fundamental Plane of black hole activity.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2020,495, 278–284

    work page 2020

  25. [26]

    Robust supermassive black hole spin mass-energy characteristics: A new method and results.Mon

    Daly, R.A. Robust supermassive black hole spin mass-energy characteristics: A new method and results.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022,517, 5144–5159

    work page 2022

  26. [27]

    C.; Zabludoff, A.I

    Cao, Z., Jonker, P .G.; Wen, S.; Stone, N. C.; Zabludoff, A.I. The rapidly spinning intermediate-mass black hole 3XMM J150052.0+015452.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2023,519, 2375–2390

    work page 2023

  27. [28]

    Testing AGN outflow and accretion models with C IV and He II emission line demographics in z≈ 2 quasars.Mon

    Temple, M.J., Matthews, J.H.; Hewett, P .C.; Rankine, A.L.; Richards, G.T.; Banerji, M.; Ferland, G.J.; Knigge, C.; Stepney, M. Testing AGN outflow and accretion models with C IV and He II emission line demographics in z≈ 2 quasars.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2023,523, 646–666

    work page 2023

  28. [29]

    Supermassive Black Hole Spin Constraints from Polarimetry in an Equatorial Disk Model.Astrophys

    Palumbo, D.C.M. Supermassive Black Hole Spin Constraints from Polarimetry in an Equatorial Disk Model.Astrophys. J. Lett. 2025,978, L4

    work page 2025

  29. [30]

    Unraveling the supermassive black hole spin distribution with NewA- thena.J

    Boorman, P .F.; Piotrowska, J.M.; Sisk-Reynés, J.M.; et al. Unraveling the supermassive black hole spin distribution with NewA- thena.J. High Energy Astrophys. in preparation

    work page

  30. [31]

    The NewAthena mission concept in the context of the next decade of X-ray astronomy.Nature2024,9, 36–44

    Cruise, M.; Guainazzi, M.; Aird, J.; Carrera, F.J.; Costantini, E.; Corrales, L.; Dauser, T.; Eckert, D.; Gastaldello, F.; Matsumoto, H.; et al. The NewAthena mission concept in the context of the next decade of X-ray astronomy.Nature2024,9, 36–44

    work page

  31. [32]

    The NewAthena X-ray optics.SPIE Proc.2025,13626, 1362602

    Bavdaz, M.; Martin-Lagarde, M.; Fransen, S; Smid, P .; Boualam, H.; Safa, F.; Girou, D.; Jenkins, Y.; Vacanti, G.; Landgraf, B.; et al. The NewAthena X-ray optics.SPIE Proc.2025,13626, 1362602

    work page 2025

  32. [33]

    Characterization of silicon pore optics for the NewAthena X-ray observatory in the PTB laboratory at BESSY II.J

    Krumrey, M.; Skroblin, D.; Cibik, L.; Collon, M.; Vacanti G.; Barrière, N.; Hauser, E.; Bavdaz, M. Characterization of silicon pore optics for the NewAthena X-ray observatory in the PTB laboratory at BESSY II.J. Synchrotron Radiat.2024,31, 716–722

    work page 2024

  33. [34]

    The X-ray Integral Field Unit at the end of the Athena reformulation phase.Exp

    Peille, P .; Barret, D.; Cucchetti, E; Albouys, V; Piro, L.; Simionescu, A.; Cappi, M.; Bellouard, E.; Cénac-Morthé, C.; Daniel, C. The X-ray Integral Field Unit at the end of the Athena reformulation phase.Exp. Astron.2025,59, 18

    work page 2025

  34. [35]

    The Hot and Energetic Universe: A White Paper presenting the science theme motivating the Athena+ mission

    Nandra, K.; Barret, D.; Barcons, X.; Fabian, A.; den Herder, J.-W.; Piro, L.; Watson, M.; Adami, C.; Aird, J.; Afonso, J.M.; Alexander, D.; et al. The Hot and Energetic universe: A White Paper presenting the science theme motivating the Athena+ mission.arXiv 2013, arXiv:1306.2307

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  35. [36]

    Introducing the NEWHORIZON simulation: Galaxy properties with resolved internal dynamics across cosmic time.Astron

    Dubois, Y.; Beckmann, R.; Bournaud, F.; Choi, H.; Devriendt, J.; Jackson, R.; Kaviraj, S.; Kimm, T.; Kraljic, K.; Laigle, C.; et al. Introducing the NEWHORIZON simulation: Galaxy properties with resolved internal dynamics across cosmic time.Astron. Astrophys.2021,651, A109

    work page 2021

  36. [37]

    Towards Precision Measurements of Accreting Black Holes Using X-Ray Reflection Spectroscopy.Space Sci

    Bambi, C.; Brenneman, L.W.; Dauser, T.; García, J.A.; Grinberg, V .; Ingram, A.; Jiang, J.; Liu, H.; Lohfink, A.M.; Marinucci, A.; et al. Towards Precision Measurements of Accreting Black Holes Using X-Ray Reflection Spectroscopy.Space Sci. Rev.2021,217, 65

    work page 2021

  37. [38]

    High-density disc reflection spectroscopy of low-mass active galactic nuclei.Mon

    Mallick, L.; Fabian, A.C.; García, J.A.; Tomsick, J.A.; Parker, M.L.; Dauser, T.; Wilkins, D.R.; De Marco, B.; Steiner, J.F.; Connors, R.M.T.; et al. High-density disc reflection spectroscopy of low-mass active galactic nuclei.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2022,513, 4361–4379

    work page 2022

  38. [39]

    First long-term optical spectral monitoring of a binary black hole candidate E1821+643

    Shapovalova, A.I.; Popovi´ c, L.ˇC.; Chavushyan, V .H.; Burenkov, A.N.; Ili´ c, D.; Kollatschny, W.; Kovaˇ cevi´ c, A.; Valdés, J.R.; Patiño-Álvarez, V .; León-Tavares, J.; et al. First long-term optical spectral monitoring of a binary black hole candidate E1821+643. Variability of spectral lines and continuum.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.2016,222, 25

    work page 2016

  39. [40]

    Evidence for a moderate spin from X-ray reflection of the high-mass supermassive black hole in the cluster-hosted quasar H1821+643.Mon

    Sisk-Reynés J.; Reynolds, C.S.; Matthews, J.H.; Smith, R.N. Evidence for a moderate spin from X-ray reflection of the high-mass supermassive black hole in the cluster-hosted quasar H1821+643.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2022,514, 2568–2580

    work page 2022

  40. [41]

    A Rapidly Spinning Black Hole Powers the Einstein Cross.Astrophys

    Reynolds, M.T.; Walton, D.J.; Miller, J.M.; Reis, R.C. A Rapidly Spinning Black Hole Powers the Einstein Cross.Astrophys. J. Lett. 2014,792, L19

    work page 2014

  41. [42]

    Geometry and kinematics of the broad emission line region in the lensed quasar Q2237+0305.Astron

    Hutsemékers, D.; Sluse, D. Geometry and kinematics of the broad emission line region in the lensed quasar Q2237+0305.Astron. Astrophys.2021,654, A155

    work page 2021

  42. [43]

    M.; Kaspi, S.; Malkan, M.A.; Maoz, D.; Merritt, D.; Netzer, H.; Onken, C.A.; Pogge, R.W.; et al

    Peterson, B.M.; Ferrarese, L.; Gilbert, K. M.; Kaspi, S.; Malkan, M.A.; Maoz, D.; Merritt, D.; Netzer, H.; Onken, C.A.; Pogge, R.W.; et al. Central Masses and Broad-Line Region Sizes of Active Galactic Nuclei. II. A Homogeneous Analysis of a Large Reverberation-Mapping Database.Astrophys. J.2012,613, 682–699

    work page 2012

  43. [44]

    The Black Hole Spin and Soft X-Ray Excess of the Luminous Seyfert Galaxy Fairall 9.Astrophys

    Lohfink, A.M.; Reynolds, C.S.; Miller, J.M.; Brenneman, L.W.; Mushotzky, R.F.; Nowak, M.A.; Fabian, A.C. The Black Hole Spin and Soft X-Ray Excess of the Luminous Seyfert Galaxy Fairall 9.Astrophys. J.2012,758, 67

    work page 2012

  44. [46]

    Reflection from the strong gravity regime in a lensed quasar at redshift z = 0.658.Nature2014,507, 207–209

    Reis, R.; Reynolds, M.T.; Miller, J.M.; Walton, D.J. Reflection from the strong gravity regime in a lensed quasar at redshift z = 0.658.Nature2014,507, 207–209

    work page

  45. [47]

    A selection effect boosting the contribution from rapidly spinning black holes to the cosmic X-ray background.Mon

    Vasudevan, R.V .; Fabian, A.C.; Reynolds, C.S.; Aird, J.; Dauser, T.; Gallo, L.C. A selection effect boosting the contribution from rapidly spinning black holes to the cosmic X-ray background.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2016,458, 2012–2023

    work page 2016

  46. [48]

    C.; García, J.A.; Harrison, F.A.; Risaliti, G.; et al

    Walton, D.J.; Nardini, E.; Gallo, L.C.; Reynolds, M.T.; Ricci, C.; Dauser, T.; Fabian, A. C.; García, J.A.; Harrison, F.A.; Risaliti, G.; et al. A low-flux state in IRAS 00521-7054 seen with NuSTAR and XMM-Newton: Relativistic reflection and an ultrafast outflow. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2019,484, 2544–2555

    work page 2019

  47. [49]

    High Density Reflection Spectroscopy—II

    Jiang, J.; Fabian, A.C.; Dauser, T.; Gallo, L.C.; García, J.A.; Kara, E.; Parker, M.L.; Tomsick, J.A.; Walton, D.J.; Reynolds, C.S. High Density Reflection Spectroscopy—II. The density of the inner black hole accretion disc in AGN Free.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019,489, 3436–3455

    work page 2019

  48. [50]

    NLS1 galaxies and estimation of their central black hole masses from the X-ray excess variance method.Mon

    Nikolajuk, M.; Czerny, B.; Gurinowicz, P . NLS1 galaxies and estimation of their central black hole masses from the X-ray excess variance method.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2009,394, 2141–2152

    work page 2009

  49. [51]

    Multi-epoch analysis of the X-ray spectrum of the active galactic nucleus in NGC 5506.Mon

    Sun, S.; Guainazzi, M.; Ni, Q.; Wang, J.; Qian, C.; Shi, F.; Wang, Y.; Bambi, C. Multi-epoch analysis of the X-ray spectrum of the active galactic nucleus in NGC 5506.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2018,478, 1900–1910

    work page 2018

  50. [52]

    Narrow Iron Kα Lines in Active Galactic Nuclei: Evolving Populations.Astrophys

    Zhou, X.-L.; Wang, J.-M. Narrow Iron Kα Lines in Active Galactic Nuclei: Evolving Populations.Astrophys. J.2005,618, L83–L86

    work page 2005

  51. [53]

    Suzaku observations of ‘bare’ active galactic nuclei.Mon

    Walton, D.J.; Nardini, E.; Fabian, A.C.; Gallo, L.C.; Reis, R.C. Suzaku observations of ‘bare’ active galactic nuclei.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2013,428, 2901–2920

    work page 2013

  52. [54]

    A New Sample of Low-Mass Black Holes in Active Galaxies.Astrophys

    Greene, J.E.; Ho, L. A New Sample of Low-Mass Black Holes in Active Galaxies.Astrophys. J.2007,670, 92–104

    work page 2007

  53. [55]

    The Host Galaxy and Central Engine of the Dwarf Active Galactic Nucleus POX 52.Astrophys

    Thornton, C.E.; Barth, A.J.; Ho, L.C.; Rutledge, R.E.; Greene, J.E. The Host Galaxy and Central Engine of the Dwarf Active Galactic Nucleus POX 52.Astrophys. J.2008,686, 892–910

    work page 2008

  54. [56]

    The broad-band view of the bare Seyfert PG 1426+015: Relativistic reflection, the soft excess, and the importance of oxygen.Mon

    Walton, D.J.; Madathil-Pottayil, A.; Kosec, P .; Jiang, J.; García, J.A.; Fabian, A.C.; Pinto, C.; Buisson, D.J.K.; Parker, M.L.; et al. The broad-band view of the bare Seyfert PG 1426+015: Relativistic reflection, the soft excess, and the importance of oxygen.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2025,543, 2633–2648

    work page 2025

  55. [57]

    Determining Central Black Hole Masses in Distant Active Galaxies and Quasars

    Vestegaard, M.; Peterson, B.M. Determining Central Black Hole Masses in Distant Active Galaxies and Quasars. II. Improved Optical and UV Scaling Relationships.Astrophys. J.2006,641, 689–709

    work page 2006

  56. [58]

    A long hard look at the minimum state of PG 2112+059 with XMM-Newton.Astron

    Schartel, N.; Rodríguez-Pascual, P .M.; Santos-Lleó, M.; Jiménez-Bailón, E.; Ballo, L.; Piconcelli, E. A long hard look at the minimum state of PG 2112+059 with XMM-Newton.Astron. Astrophys.2010,512, A75

    work page 2010

  57. [59]

    The simultaneous optical-to-X-ray spectral energy distribution of soft X-ray selected active galactic nuclei observed by Swift.Astrophys

    Grupe, D.; Komossa, S.; Leighly, K.M.; Page, K.L. The simultaneous optical-to-X-ray spectral energy distribution of soft X-ray selected active galactic nuclei observed by Swift.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.2010,187, 64–106

    work page 2010

  58. [60]

    A relativistic disc reflection model for 1H0419-577: Multi-epoch spectral analysis with XMM-Newton and NuSTAR.Mon

    Jiang, J.; Walton, D.J.; Fabian, A.C.; Parker, M.L. A relativistic disc reflection model for 1H0419-577: Multi-epoch spectral analysis with XMM-Newton and NuSTAR.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2018,483, 2958–2967

    work page 2018

  59. [61]

    Reverberation Mapping Results for Five Seyfert 1 Galaxies.Astrophys

    Grier, C.J.; Peterson, B.M.; Pogge, R.W.; Denney, K.D.; Bentz, M.C.; Martini, P .; Sergeev, S.G.; Kaspi, S.; Minezaki, T.; Zu, Y.; et al. Reverberation Mapping Results for Five Seyfert 1 Galaxies.Astrophys. J.2012,755, 60

    work page 2012

  60. [62]

    Joint XMM-Newton and NuSTAR observations of the reflection spectrum of III Zw 2

    Chamani, W.; Karri, K.; Savolainen, T. Joint XMM-Newton and NuSTAR observations of the reflection spectrum of III Zw 2. Astron. Astrophys.2020,635, A172

    work page 2020

  61. [63]

    Exploring the high-density reflection model for the soft excess in RBS 1124.Mon

    Madathil-Pottayil, A.; Walton, D.J.; García, J.A.; Miller, J.; Gallo, L.C.; Ricci, C.; Reynolds, M.T.; Stern, D.; Dauser, T.; Jiang, J.; et al. Exploring the high-density reflection model for the soft excess in RBS 1124.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2024,534, 608–620

    work page 2024

  62. [64]

    Size and properties of the narrow-line region in Seyfert-2 galaxies from spatially-resolved optical spectroscopy.Astron

    Bennert, N.; Jungwiert, B.; Komossa, S.; Haas, M.; Chini, R. Size and properties of the narrow-line region in Seyfert-2 galaxies from spatially-resolved optical spectroscopy.Astron. Astrophys.2006,456, 55–69

    work page 2006

  63. [65]

    An X-ray variable absorber within the broad line region in Fairall 51.Astron

    Svoboda, J.; Beuchert, T.; Guainazzi, M.; Longinotti, A.L.; Piconcelli, E.; Wilms, J. An X-ray variable absorber within the broad line region in Fairall 51.Astron. Astrophys.2015,578, A96

    work page 2015

  64. [66]

    L.; et al

    Walton, D J.; Brightman, M.; Risaliti, G.; Fabian, A.C.; Fürst, F.; Harrison, F.A.; Lohfink, A.; Matt, G.; Miniutti, G.; Parker, M. L.; et al. Disentangling the complex broad-band X-ray spectrum of IRAS 13197-1627 with NuSTAR, XMM-Newton and Suzaku.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2018,473, 4377–4391

    work page 2018

  65. [67]

    An X-Ray View of the Jet Cycle in the Radio-loud AGN 3C120.Astrophys

    Lohfink, A.M.; Reynolds, C.S.; Jorstad, S.G.; Marscher, A.P .; Miller, E.D.; Aller, H.; Aller, M.F.; Brenneman, L.W.; Fabian, A.C.; Miller, J.M.; et al. An X-Ray View of the Jet Cycle in the Radio-loud AGN 3C120.Astrophys. J.2013,772, 83

    work page 2013

  66. [68]

    A full characterization of the supermassive black hole in IRAS 09149-6206.Mon

    Walton, D.J.; Alston, W.N.; Kosec, P .; Fabian, A.C.; Gallo, L.C.; García, J.A.; Miller, J.M.; Nardini, E.; Reynolds, M.T.; Ricci, C.; et al. A full characterization of the supermassive black hole in IRAS 09149-6206.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2019,499, 1480–1498

    work page 2019

  67. [69]

    NuSTAR and Suzaku X-ray spectroscopy of NGC 4151: Evidence for reflection from the inner accretion disk.Astrophys

    Keck, M.L.; Brenneman, L.W.; Ballantyne, D.R.; Bauer, F.; Boggs, S.E.; Christensen, F.E.; Craig, W.W.; Dauser, T.; Elvis, M.; Fabian, A.C.; et al. NuSTAR and Suzaku X-ray spectroscopy of NGC 4151: Evidence for reflection from the inner accretion disk.Astrophys. J.2015,806, 149

    work page 2015

  68. [70]

    The Broad Line Region and Black Hole Mass of NGC 4151.Astrophys

    Bentz, M.C.; Williams, P .R.; Treu, T. The Broad Line Region and Black Hole Mass of NGC 4151.Astrophys. J.2022,934, 168

    work page 2022

  69. [72]

    Broad-band spectral study of the jet-disc emission in the radio-loud narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy 1H 0323+342.Mon

    Ghosh, R.; Dewangan, G.C.; Mallick, L.; Raychaudhuri, B. Broad-band spectral study of the jet-disc emission in the radio-loud narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy 1H 0323+342.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2018,479, 2464–2475

    work page 2018

  70. [73]

    Extreme relativistic reflection in the active galaxy ESO 033-G002.Mon

    Walton, D.J.; Balokovi´ c, M.; Fabian, A.C.; Gallo, L.C.; Koss, M.; Nardini, E.; Reynolds, C.S.; Ricci, C.; Stern, D.; Alston, W.N.; et al. Extreme relativistic reflection in the active galaxy ESO 033-G002.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2021,506, 1557–1572

    work page 2021

  71. [74]

    The Spin of the Supermassive Black Hole in NGC 3783.Astrophys

    Brenneman, L.; Reynolds, C.S.; Nowak, M.A.; Reis, R.C.; Trippe, M.; Fabian, A.C.; Iwasawa, K.; Lee, J.C.; Miller, J.M.; Mushotzky, R.F.; et al. The Spin of the Supermassive Black Hole in NGC 3783.Astrophys. J.2011,736, 103

    work page 2011

  72. [75]

    A geometric distance to the supermassive black Hole of NGC 3783.Astron

    GRAVITY Collaboration. A geometric distance to the supermassive black Hole of NGC 3783.Astron. Astrophys.2021,654, A85

    work page 2021

  73. [76]

    Suzaku observations of Mrk 335: Confronting partial covering and relativistic reflection.Mon

    Gallo, L.; Wilkins, D.R.; Bonson, K.; Chiang, C.-Y.; Grupe, D.; Parker, M.L.; Zoghbi, A.; Fabian, A.C.; Komossa, S.; Longinotti, A.L. Suzaku observations of Mrk 335: Confronting partial covering and relativistic reflection.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2015,446, 633–650

    work page 2015

  74. [77]

    Supermassive Black Holes with High Accretion Rates in Active Galactic Nuclei

    Hu, C.; Li, S.-S.; Yang, S.; Yang, Z.-X.; Guo, W.-J.; Bao, D.-W.; Jiang, B.-W.; Du, P .; Li, Y.-R.; Xiao, M.; et al. Supermassive Black Holes with High Accretion Rates in Active Galactic Nuclei. XII. Reverberation Mapping Results for 15 PG Quasars from a Long-duration High-cadence Campaign.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.2021,253, 20

    work page 2021

  75. [78]

    Constraining black hole spin in PG 1535+547 amidst complex multi-layered absorption.Mon

    Madathil-Pottayil, A.; Walton, D.J.; Jiang, J.; Dauser, T.; Fabian, A.C.; Stern, D.; Gallo, Luigi C.; Reynolds, M.T.; Nardini, E.; Garcia, J.A. Constraining black hole spin in PG 1535+547 amidst complex multi-layered absorption.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2026,546, stag157

    work page 2026

  76. [79]

    D.; Parker, M.L

    Agís-González, B.; Miniutti, G.; Kara, E.; Fabian, A.C.; Sanfrutos, M.; Risaliti, G.; Bianchi, S.; Strotjohann, N.L.; Saxton, R. D.; Parker, M.L. Black hole spin and size of the X-ray emitting region(s) in the Seyfert 1.5 galaxy ESO 362–G18.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2014,444, 2862–2873

    work page 2014

  77. [80]

    The 1.5 Ms observing campaign on IRAS 13224-3809—I

    Jiang, J.; Parker, M.L.; Fabian, A.C.; Alston, W.N.; Buisson, D.J.K.; Cackett, E.M.; Chiang, C.-Y.; Dauser, T.; Gallo, L.C.; García, J.A.; et al. The 1.5 Ms observing campaign on IRAS 13224-3809—I. X-ray spectral analysis.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2018,477, 3711–3726

    work page 2018

  78. [81]

    Broad iron L-line and X-ray reverberation in 1H0707-495.Mon

    Zoghbi, A.; Fabian, A.C.; Uttley, P .; Miniutti, G.; Gallo, L.C.; Reynolds, C.S.; Miller, J.M.; Ponti, G. Broad iron L-line and X-ray reverberation in 1H0707-495.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2010,401, 2419–2432

    work page 2010

  79. [82]

    A Reverberation-based Black Hole Mass for MCG–06-30-15.Astrophys

    Bentz, M.; Cackett, E.M.; Crenshaw, D.M.; Horne, K.; Street, R.; Ou-Yang, B. A Reverberation-based Black Hole Mass for MCG–06-30-15.Astrophys. J.2016,830, 136

    work page 2016

  80. [83]

    A Sharper View of the X-Ray Spectrum of MCG–6-30-15 with XRISM, XMM-Newton, and NuSTAR.Astrophys

    Brenneman, L.; Wilkins, D.R.; Ogorzałek, A.; Rogantini, D.; Fabian, A.C.; García, J.A.; Jurá ˇ nová, A.; Mizumoto, M.; Noda, H.; et al. A Sharper View of the X-Ray Spectrum of MCG–6-30-15 with XRISM, XMM-Newton, and NuSTAR.Astrophys. J.2025,955, 200

    work page 2025

Showing first 80 references.