pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.14264 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.SR

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

The compact neutron star in 4U 1746-37 revisited: Reassessing the mass and radius

Kwang Hyun Sung , Myungkuk Kim , Young-Min Kim , Kyujin Kwak , Chang-Hwan Lee
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR
keywords neutron starsX-ray burstsmass-radius relationflux blocking4U 1746-37photospheric radius expansionlow-mass X-ray binaries
0
0 comments X

The pith

Significant X-ray flux blocking allows the neutron star in 4U 1746-37 to match standard mass and radius values.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Previous estimates from photospheric radius expansion bursts in 4U 1746-37 gave unusually small neutron star mass and radius, raising the possibility of exotic quark matter. The paper proposes instead that strong geometric blocking reduces the observed flux to about 17 percent of the true emission. With blocking factors B of 0.8 or higher that change as the photosphere expands, the inferred parameters shift to canonical ranges: either 1.59 solar masses and 13 km radius or 2.12 solar masses and 9.8 km radius. This same blocking accounts for the observed peak flux being twice the touchdown flux. The result shows that system geometry must be included when converting burst fluxes into neutron star properties.

Core claim

The neutron star in the low-mass X-ray binary 4U 1746-37 has mass and radius consistent with canonical values when significant flux blocking factors of B ≳ 0.8 are accounted for. These factors reduce the observed flux to roughly 17% of the intrinsic emission, yielding possible solutions of M = 1.59 ± 0.69 M⊙ and R = 13.0 ± 5.45 km, or M = 2.12 ± 1.08 M⊙ and R = 9.80 ± 4.13 km. The radius-dependent blocking naturally explains the anomalously large peak-to-touchdown flux ratio of approximately 2.0.

What carries the argument

The blocking factor B that reduces observed X-ray flux and varies with photospheric radius during the expansion and contraction phases of the burst.

If this is right

  • The neutron star mass and radius can be 1.59 solar masses and 13 km.
  • The neutron star mass and radius can be 2.12 solar masses and 9.8 km.
  • The factor-of-two peak-to-touchdown flux ratio arises because blocking is stronger at larger photospheric radii.
  • Mass-radius estimates from photospheric radius expansion bursts in other systems must include geometric blocking effects.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar blocking may affect other X-ray bursters that show unusually large peak-to-touchdown ratios.
  • The blocking could be produced by the accretion disk or companion star, offering a testable geometric signature in future observations.
  • This view keeps the neutron star within the standard hadronic mass-radius range rather than requiring quark matter.
  • Incorporating blocking into burst models could reduce scatter in the observed neutron star mass-radius distribution.

Load-bearing premise

Significant flux blocking of order 0.8 or more occurs and changes as the photosphere expands and contracts.

What would settle it

A direct measurement during a burst that shows the intrinsic flux is not reduced by a factor of five or more, or timing data that reveals no geometric obscuration varying with radius.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14264 by Chang-Hwan Lee, Kwang Hyun Sung, Kyujin Kwak, Myungkuk Kim, Young-Min Kim.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic cross-sectional view of the blocking mechanism in high-inclination LMXB systems. Left panel: Thin accretion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Blocking factor B for the thin-disk (top panels) and thick-disk (bottom panels) geometries shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Mass–radius solutions for the neutron star in 4U 1746- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Monte Carlo mass–radius constraints for 4U 1746−37 over a sampled grid of fixed blocking factors, B = 0, 0.1, 0.2, . . . , 0.8. Each panel shows the distribution of accepted solu￾tions in the M–R plane for the indicated value of B. As the assumed blocking factor increases, the allowed region shifts systematically from the unusually compact, low-mass regime to￾ward higher masses and larger radii. The white … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Zoomed Monte Carlo mass–radius con￾straints for 4U 1746−37 in the high-blocking regime, B = 0.8, 0.82, 0.84, 0.86, 0.88, and 0.9. This finer sampling highlights the rapid evo￾lution of the allowed solution space as B ap￾proaches extreme values. In this regime, the surviving solutions extend into the canonical neutron star range and overlap more substan￾tially with several standard nucleonic equations of st… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A recent analysis of photospheric radius expansion X-ray bursts from the low-mass X-ray binary 4U 1746-37 reported unusually small mass and radius estimates for the neutron star, suggesting it could be a quark star or quark-cluster star. Here, we propose an alternative interpretation: the star's mass and radius could be underestimated from significant blocking of the X-ray flux. Significant blocking factors ($\mathcal{B} \gtrsim 0.8$, reducing the observed flux to $\sim17\%$ of the intrinsic emission) permit neutron star parameters consistent with the canonical values: $M = 1.59 \pm 0.69 M_{\odot}$, $R = 13.0 \pm 5.45\,\mathrm{km}$, or $M = 2.12 \pm 1.08 M_{\odot}$, $R = 9.80 \pm 4.13\,\mathrm{km}$. The blocking factor, which varies with the photospheric radius, provides a natural explanation for the anomalously large peak-to-touchdown flux ratio ($\sim2.0$) and highlights the importance of accounting for geometric system configuration in neutron star mass--radius estimates.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reanalyzes photospheric radius expansion (PRE) X-ray bursts from the LMXB 4U 1746-37. It argues that the previously reported small neutron-star mass and radius (suggesting exotic matter) arise from underestimating the intrinsic flux due to geometric blocking. By introducing a radius-dependent blocking factor B ≳ 0.8 (reducing observed flux to ~17% of intrinsic), the authors recover canonical parameters M = 1.59 ± 0.69 M⊙, R = 13.0 ± 5.45 km or M = 2.12 ± 1.08 M⊙, R = 9.80 ± 4.13 km, while also explaining the observed peak-to-touchdown flux ratio of ~2.0.

Significance. If the blocking interpretation is physically justified, the result would remove one apparent outlier from the neutron-star mass-radius diagram and emphasize the role of system geometry in PRE-burst analyses. The large reported uncertainties, however, limit the immediate impact on equation-of-state constraints.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, §3] Abstract and §3: the blocking factor B ≳ 0.8 is introduced as a free parameter chosen to shift the inferred M/R into the canonical range; no independent geometric constraint (inclination, disk scale height, or line-of-sight obscuration) is provided to fix B(R_ph) before the fit.
  2. [§4] The central claim requires that the same B(R) simultaneously reproduces both the flux ratio ~2.0 and the touchdown radius used for the M/R inference, yet no explicit functional form B(R_ph) or numerical demonstration is given.
  3. [Table 1] Table 1 and error analysis: the reported uncertainties (±0.69 M⊙, ±5.45 km) are already large enough that any adjustable B can move the solution into the canonical band; the load-bearing step is therefore the untested assumption that such a B exists and varies exactly as required.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation: the symbol B is used both for the blocking factor and (implicitly) for magnetic field in related literature; a distinct symbol would reduce confusion.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states B “varies with the photospheric radius” but the main text does not show the explicit dependence or its derivation from system parameters.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and indicate revisions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, §3] Abstract and §3: the blocking factor B ≳ 0.8 is introduced as a free parameter chosen to shift the inferred M/R into the canonical range; no independent geometric constraint (inclination, disk scale height, or line-of-sight obscuration) is provided to fix B(R_ph) before the fit.

    Authors: The blocking factor is not chosen arbitrarily to reach canonical M/R; its value is fixed by the independent requirement to reproduce the observed peak-to-touchdown flux ratio of ~2.0, which standard PRE models cannot explain without radius-dependent blocking. We have revised §3 to clarify this constraint and to discuss plausible geometric origins (high inclination and disk obscuration) that can produce B ≳ 0.8. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4] The central claim requires that the same B(R) simultaneously reproduces both the flux ratio ~2.0 and the touchdown radius used for the M/R inference, yet no explicit functional form B(R_ph) or numerical demonstration is given.

    Authors: We agree an explicit form improves clarity. The revised §4 now introduces a simple parametrization B(R_ph) = B_0 (R_ph / R_td)^α with parameters set by the flux ratio, together with a numerical example confirming simultaneous consistency with both the ratio and the touchdown radius. A full radiative-transfer derivation is noted as future work. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Table 1] Table 1 and error analysis: the reported uncertainties (±0.69 M⊙, ±5.45 km) are already large enough that any adjustable B can move the solution into the canonical band; the load-bearing step is therefore the untested assumption that such a B exists and varies exactly as required.

    Authors: The uncertainties reflect the limited burst sample and flux precision; they are reported transparently. The assumption is tested by requiring the same B(R) to match the flux ratio, which then places M and R in the canonical range without additional tuning. We have added a sensitivity analysis in the revised error section demonstrating that only flux-ratio-consistent B values yield the reported parameters. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Blocking factor B fitted to recover canonical M/R by construction

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "Significant blocking factors (B ≳ 0.8, reducing the observed flux to ∼17% of the intrinsic emission) permit neutron star parameters consistent with the canonical values: M = 1.59 ± 0.69 M⊙, R = 13.0 ± 5.45 km, or M = 2.12 ± 1.08 M⊙, R = 9.80 ± 4.13 km."

    The reported M and R are derived after introducing B as a free parameter that scales the observed flux; the specific numerical values are those that become canonical once B is adjusted to also reproduce the observed flux ratio of ∼2.0. The outcome is therefore defined by the fitted B rather than predicted from the data alone.

full rationale

The paper introduces B ≳ 0.8 as an adjustable parameter that reduces observed flux and varies with photospheric radius, then reports M and R values that fall in the canonical range. This step matches the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern: the quoted masses and radii are obtained only after choosing B to correct the previously anomalous peak-to-touchdown ratio, so the result is forced by the choice of B rather than independently constrained. No self-citation chain or uniqueness theorem is invoked; the circularity is limited to the single load-bearing assumption that such a radius-dependent B exists and can be tuned to the data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the introduction of a free blocking factor chosen to reconcile the observed fluxes with canonical neutron-star parameters and on the domain assumption that the flux-ratio anomaly is produced by this blocking.

free parameters (1)
  • blocking factor B = ≳ 0.8
    Introduced and set to ≳0.8 so that the reduced observed flux yields canonical mass and radius values.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The anomalously large peak-to-touchdown flux ratio (~2.0) is produced by variable geometric blocking of the X-ray emission.
    Invoked in the abstract to justify the blocking model and to link it to the observed flux ratio.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5536 in / 1383 out tokens · 87497 ms · 2026-05-15T02:18:19.479243+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages · 32 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Antoniadis, J. et al. 2013, Science, 340, 6131

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    & Zwicky , F

    Baade , W. & Zwicky , F. 1934, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 20, 254

    work page 1934

  3. [3]

    2009, , 138, 50

    Balman , S . 2009, , 138, 50

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    J., & Smale , A

    Ba uci \'n ska-Church , M., Church , M. J., & Smale , A. P. 2004, , 347, 334

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    1971, , 170, 299

    Baym , G., Pethick , C., & Sutherland , P. 1971, , 170, 299

    work page 1971

  6. [6]

    V., Rothschild , R

    Bradt , H. V., Rothschild , R. E., & Swank , J. H. 1993, , 97, 355

    work page 1993

  7. [7]

    N., Hill , J

    Burrows , D. N., Hill , J. E., Nousek , J. A., et al. 2005, , 120, 165

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    1932, Proc

    Chadwick , J. 1932, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 136, 692

    work page 1932

  9. [9]

    Damen , E., Magnier , E., Lewin , W. H. G., et al. 1990, , 237, 103

    work page 1990

  10. [10]

    2010, , 467, 1081

    Demorest, P., Pennucci, T., Ransom, S., Roberts, M., & Hessels, J. 2010, , 467, 1081

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    W., Anderson , S

    Deutsch , E. W., Anderson , S. F., Margon , B., & Downes , R. A. 1998, , 493, 775

    work page 1998

  12. [12]

    R., & Lasota , J.-P

    Frank , J., King , A. R., & Lasota , J.-P. 1987, , 178, 137

    work page 1987

  13. [13]

    Fujimoto , M. Y. 1988, , 324, 995

    work page 1988

  14. [14]

    K., Muno , M

    Galloway , D. K., Muno , M. P., Hartman , J. M., Psaltis , D., & Chakrabarty , D. 2008 a , , 179, 360

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    K., \"O zel , F., & Psaltis , D

    Galloway , D. K., \"O zel , F., & Psaltis , D. 2008 b , , 387, 268

    work page 2008

  16. [16]

    C., Arzoumanian , Z., Adkins , P

    Gendreau , K. C., Arzoumanian , Z., Adkins , P. W., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9905, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, ed. J.-W. A. den Herder , T. Takahashi , & M. Bautz , 99051H

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    1974, , 27, 37

    Giacconi , R., Murray , S., Gursky , H., et al. 1974, , 27, 37

    work page 1974

  18. [18]

    u ver , T., \

    G \"u ver , T., \"O zel , F., & Psaltis , D. 2012 a , , 747, 77

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    u ver , T., Psaltis , D., & \

    G \"u ver , T., Psaltis , D., & \"O zel , F. 2012 b , , 747, 76

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    A., Craig , W

    Harrison , F. A., Craig , W. W., Christensen , F. E., et al. 2013, , 770, 103

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    He , C. C. & Keek , L. 2016, , 819, 47

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    in't Zand , J. J. M., Kries , M. J. W., Palmer , D. M., & Degenaar , N. 2019, , 621, A53

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    G., van der Klis , M., Homan , J., et al

    Jonker , P. G., van der Klis , M., Homan , J., et al. 2000, , 531, 453

    work page 2000

  24. [24]

    a ttil \

    Kajava , J. J. E., N \"a ttil \"a , J., Latvala , O.-M., et al. 2014, , 445, 4218

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    H., Lee , C.-H., & Kwak , K

    Kim , M., Kim , Y.-M., Sung , K. H., Lee , C.-H., & Kwak , K. 2021, , 650, A139

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    R., in't Zand , J

    Kuulkers , E., den Hartog , P. R., in't Zand , J. J. M., et al. 2003, , 399, 663

    work page 2003

  27. [27]

    Lapidus , I. I. & Sunyaev , R. A. 1985, , 217, 291

    work page 1985

  28. [28]

    Lattimer , J. M. & Prakash , M. 2001, , 550, 426

    work page 2001

  29. [29]

    Lattimer , J. M. & Prakash , M. 2007, , 442, 109

    work page 2007

  30. [30]

    Lewin , W. H. G., van Paradijs , J., & Taam , R. E. 1993, , 62, 223

    work page 1993

  31. [31]

    & Clark , G

    Li , F. & Clark , G. 1977, , 3095, 2

    work page 1977

  32. [32]

    2015, , 798, 56

    Li , Z., Qu , Z., Chen , L., et al. 2015, , 798, 56

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    P., Motta , S

    Mu \ n oz-Darias , T., Fender , R. P., Motta , S. E., & Belloni , T. M. 2014, , 443, 3270

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    & Yi , I

    Narayan , R. & Yi , I. 1994, , 428, L13

    work page 1994

  35. [35]

    a ttil \

    N \"a ttil \"a , J., Miller , M. C., Steiner , A. W., et al. 2017, , 608, A31

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    a ttil \

    N \"a ttil \"a , J., Steiner , A. W., Kajava , J. J. E., Suleimanov , V. F., & Poutanen , J. 2016, , 591, A25

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    2006, , 441, 1115

    \"O zel , F. 2006, , 441, 1115

    work page 2006

  38. [38]

    & Freire , P

    \"O zel , F. & Freire , P. 2016, , 54, 401

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    & Psaltis , D

    \"O zel , F. & Psaltis , D. 2009, , 80, 103003

    work page 2009

  40. [40]

    2021, , 923, 88

    Panurach , T., Strader , J., Bahramian , A., et al. 2021, , 923, 88

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    N., Stella , L., & Giommi , P

    Parmar , A. N., Stella , L., & Giommi , P. 1989, , 222, 96

    work page 1989

  42. [42]

    2023, in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Physics, ed

    Piekarewicz , J. 2023, in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Physics, ed. E. J. Okampo , N. Nwulu , & P. N. Bokoro (Oxford University Press), 91

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    a ttil \

    Poutanen , J., N \"a ttil \"a , J., Kajava , J. J. E., et al. 2014, , 442, 3777

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    E., Dotani , T., Asai , K., & Lehto , H

    Sansom , A. E., Dotani , T., Asai , K., & Lehto , H. J. 1993, , 262, 429

    work page 1993

  45. [45]

    Shakura , N. I. & Sunyaev , R. A. 1973, , 24, 337

    work page 1973

  46. [46]

    Shapiro , S. L. & Teukolsky , S. A. 1983, Black holes, white dwarfs and neutron stars. The physics of compact objects (New York: Wiley)

    work page 1983

  47. [47]

    W., Lattimer , J

    Steiner , A. W., Lattimer , J. M., & Brown , E. F. 2010, , 722, 33

    work page 2010

  48. [48]

    2011, , 742, 122

    Suleimanov , V., Poutanen , J., Revnivtsev , M., & Werner , K. 2011, , 742, 122

    work page 2011

  49. [49]

    a ttil \

    Suleimanov , V. F., Poutanen , J., N \"a ttil \"a , J., et al. 2017, , 466, 906

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    F., Poutanen , J., & Werner , K

    Suleimanov , V. F., Poutanen , J., & Werner , K. 2018, , 619, A114

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    Y., van Paradijs , J., et al

    Sztajno , M., Fujimoto , M. Y., van Paradijs , J., et al. 1987, , 226, 39

    work page 1987

  52. [52]

    & Lewin , W

    van Paradijs , J. & Lewin , W. H. G. 1987, , 172, L20

    work page 1987

  53. [53]

    A study of the low-mass X-ray binary dip sources XB 1916-053, XB 1323-619, X 1624-490 and 4U 1746-371 observed with INTEGRAL

    A Study of the Low-Mass X-Ray Binary Dip Sources XB 1916 - 053, XB 1323 - 619, X 1624 - 490 and 4U 1746 - 371 Observed with INTEGRAL. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/138/1/50 , archivePrefix =. 0904.3432 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-6256/138/1/50 1916

  54. [54]

    , keywords =

    The light curves of low-mass X-ray binaries. , keywords =

    work page

  55. [55]

    Masses, Radii, and Equation of State of Neutron Stars

    Masses, Radii, and the Equation of State of Neutron Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023322 , archivePrefix =. 1603.02698 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023322

  56. [56]

    Neutron Star Observations: Prognosis for Equation of State Constraints

    Neutron star observations: Prognosis for equation of state constraints. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.003 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0612440 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.003 2007

  57. [57]

    An Ultra Low Mass and Small Radius Compact Object in 4U 1746-37?

    An Ultra-low-mass and Small-radius Compact Object in 4U 1746-37?. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/798/1/56 , archivePrefix =. 1405.3438 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/798/1/56

  58. [58]

    , year = 1993, month = sep, volume =

    X-Ray Bursts. , year = 1993, month = sep, volume =. doi:10.1007/BF00196124 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00196124 1993

  59. [59]

    EXO 0748-676 Rules out Soft Equations of State for Neutron Star Matter

    Soft equations of state for neutron-star matter ruled out by EXO 0748 - 676. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature04858 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0605106 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/nature04858

  60. [60]

    The Equation of State from Observed Masses and Radii of Neutron Stars

    The Equation of State from Observed Masses and Radii of Neutron Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/33 , archivePrefix =. 1005.0811 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/722/1/33

  61. [61]

    Neutron star stiff equation of state derived from cooling phases of the X-ray burster 4U 1724-307

    A Neutron Star Stiff Equation of State Derived from Cooling Phases of the X-Ray Burster 4U 1724-307. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/122 , archivePrefix =. 1004.4871 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/122

  62. [62]

    Thermonuclear (type-I) X-ray bursts observed by the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer

    Thermonuclear (Type I) X-Ray Bursts Observed by the Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/592044 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0608259 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/592044

  63. [63]

    and Wilkinson, M

    Biases for neutron star mass, radius and distance measurements from Eddington-limited X-ray bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13219.x , archivePrefix =. 0712.0412 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13219.x 2008

  64. [64]

    , keywords =

    X-ray timing explorer mission. , keywords =

    work page

  65. [65]

    The Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) Mission

    The Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) High-energy X-Ray Mission. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103 , archivePrefix =. 1301.7307 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/2/103

  66. [66]

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray , year = 2016, editor =

    The Neutron star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER): design and development. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray , year = 2016, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.2231304 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2231304 2016

  67. [67]

    Neutron Star Structure and the Equation of State

    Neutron Star Structure and the Equation of State. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/319702 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0002232 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/319702

  68. [68]

    The Swift X-ray Telescope

    The Swift X-Ray Telescope. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-005-5097-2 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0508071 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s11214-005-5097-2

  69. [69]

    , year = 1974, month = feb, volume =

    The Third UHURU Catalog of X-Ray Sources. , year = 1974, month = feb, volume =. doi:10.1086/190288 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/190288 1974

  70. [70]

    , year = 1977, month = aug, volume =

    X-Ray Bursts. , year = 1977, month = aug, volume =

    work page 1977

  71. [71]

    , keywords =

    Constraints on the mass-radius relation of the neutron star in 4U 1746-37/NGC 6441. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/226.1.39 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/226.1.39

  72. [72]

    , keywords =

    EXOSAT observations of five luminous globular cluster X-ray sources. , keywords =

    work page

  73. [73]

    , keywords =

    Detection of a 5.7h period in the globular cluster X-ray source 4U 1746-371. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/262.2.429 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/262.2.429

  74. [74]

    The Probable Optical Counterpart of the Luminous X-ray Source in NGC 6441

    The Probable Optical Counterpart of the Luminous X-Ray Source in NGC 6441. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/305140 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9704157 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/305140

  75. [75]

    Discovery of a ~1 Hz quasi-periodic oscillation in the low-mass X-ray binary 4U 1746-37

    Discovery of a -0.5ex 1 HZ Quasi-periodic Oscillation in the Low-Mass X-Ray Binary 4U 1746-37. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/308471 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9910159 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/308471

  76. [76]

    Photospheric radius expansion X-ray bursts as standard candles

    Photospheric radius expansion X-ray bursts as standard candles. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021781 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0212028 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021781

  77. [77]

    2004, MNRAS, 351, 1379, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07876.x

    The orbital period of the dipping, bursting, globular cluster X-ray source XB 1746-371 from Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07218.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0310119 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07218.x 2004

  78. [78]

    Black hole-like hysteresis and accretion states in neutron star low mass X-ray binaries

    Black hole-like hysteresis and accretion states in neutron star low-mass X-ray binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1334 , archivePrefix =. 1407.1318 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1334

  79. [79]

    Searching for the most powerful thermonuclear X-ray bursts with the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory

    Searching for the most powerful thermonuclear X-ray bursts with the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834270 , archivePrefix =. 1811.06486 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834270

  80. [80]

    , keywords =

    The MAVERIC Survey: Variable Jet-accretion Coupling in Luminous Accreting Neutron Stars in Galactic Globular Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2c6b , archivePrefix =. 2110.00586 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2c6b

Showing first 80 references.