pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.14693 · v1 · pith:EMHBHFFOnew · submitted 2026-05-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Discovery of a Compact Hub-Filament System in G286.21+0.17 with JWST and ALMA: Insights into Protocluster Formation and Competitive Accretion

L. K. Dewangan , N. K. Bhadari , Ram K. Yadav , A. K. Maity , O. R. Jadhav , Kee-Tae Kim , Paul F. Goldsmith , A. Saha
show 12 more authors
Dana Alina Chang Won Lee Saurabh Sharma Tie Liu Patricio Sanhueza Tapas Baug E. Sharma Fengwei Xu Ariful Hoque James O. Chibueze Dana Makarova Wenyu Jiao
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 20:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords hub-filament systemcompetitive accretionprotoclusterG286.21+0.17core mass distributionfilament accretionJWST imagingALMA observations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Observations of protocluster G286 reveal steep power-law increases in core density and mass toward the hub center that match a competitive accretion model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports JWST and ALMA data on the massive protocluster G286.21+0.17 that uncover a compact hub-filament system roughly 0.5 pc across, with a central hub fed by at least four converging filaments. Within the inner 0.1 pc, the number density of 1.38 mm cores rises as r to the power of -2.4, surface density as r to the power of -1.0, and enclosed core mass as r to the power of -1.2. These trends, together with measured filament accretion rates between 7 times 10 to the -6 and 1.8 times 10 to the -4 solar masses per year, are presented as evidence that gravitational focusing drives faster core growth near the hub. The work links this process to the overall regulation of star formation through filamentary mass supply, competitive core growth, and feedback from an adjacent H II region.

Core claim

The paper discovers a compact hub-filament system in G286.21+0.17 consisting of a dense central hub connected by at least four filaments visible in absorption, with the hub containing dense core G286c1. ALMA H13CO+ emission confirms the structure over a narrow velocity range. The radial profiles of ALMAGAL 1.38 mm cores inside r less than 8 arcseconds show core number density rho proportional to r to the -2.4 plus or minus 0.5, surface density Sigma proportional to r to the -1.0 plus or minus 0.2, and enclosed core mass M_core proportional to r to the -1.2 plus or minus 0.2, while core diameters stay roughly constant. These relations plus filament accretion rates of 7 times 10 to the -6 to 1

What carries the argument

The steep radial power-law distributions of core number density, surface density, and enclosed mass toward the hub center, which are interpreted as the signature of gravitational focusing that accelerates core growth.

If this is right

  • Filamentary accretion supplies the mass reservoir that feeds competitive core growth inside the hub.
  • Gravity-driven turbulence is traced by the observed increase in filament linewidths from outer regions to the hub.
  • The hub-filament system formed through large-scale gas layer interactions followed by compression from the neighboring H II region.
  • Star formation in the region is shaped by the combination of filamentary accretion, competitive core growth, and stellar feedback.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same power-law indices could be searched for in other compact hub-filament systems to test whether the slopes are characteristic of the competitive accretion phase.
  • Hydrodynamic simulations of protocluster assembly could be checked against these specific radial profiles to see whether competitive accretion alone reproduces the observed exponents.
  • The reported lack of alignment between velocity gradients and gravitational force vectors may mark a later evolutionary stage that could be compared with younger hub-filament systems.

Load-bearing premise

The measured power-law indices and accretion rates indicate competitive accretion rather than projection effects, incomplete sampling of cores, or other dynamical processes.

What would settle it

A similar hub-filament system observed at comparable resolution whose core number density, surface density, and enclosed mass profiles show power-law indices flatter than -1.5, -0.5, and -0.7 respectively, or whose filament linewidths do not increase toward the hub.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14693 by A. K. Maity, Ariful Hoque, A. Saha, Chang Won Lee, Dana Alina, Dana Makarova, E. Sharma, Fengwei Xu, James O. Chibueze, Kee-Tae Kim, L. K. Dewangan, N. K. Bhadari, O. R. Jadhav, Patricio Sanhueza, Paul F. Goldsmith, Ram K. Yadav, Saurabh Sharma, Tapas Baug, Tie Liu, Wenyu Jiao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: a) Spitzer three-color composite map (8 µm in red, 4.5 µm in green, and 3.6 µm in blue) of the area hosting G286- clump and H ii region A, overlaid with SMGPS 1.3 GHz continuum contours (yellow). The contour levels are 0.075, 0.15, 0.55, 2, 3, and 3.6 mJy beam−1 and the scale bar is produced at a distance of 2.5 kpc. The bottom-right inset presents a zoomed-in view of G286-clump (see dotted box in Figure 1… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: a) Three-color composite map (8 µm (red)+ f470N (green) + f356W (blue)) made using Spitzer and JWST NIR images (see the dot-dashed box in Figure 1a). Most of the H2 outflows seen within the encircled area in Fig￾ure 2a are presented in Figure 2b. b) JWST f470N/f410M ra￾tio map tracing multiple H2 protostellar jets/outflows toward G286-clump. c) Three-color composite map generated us￾ing the f405N/f410M (Br… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: a) ATOMS H13CO+(1–0) moment-0 map integrated over the velocity range of −22.9 to −16.3 km s−1 (corresponding to the dot-dashed box shown in Figure 1a). b) ATOMS H13CO+ moment-1 map. Arrows mark the candidate filaments forming an HFS morphology. Magenta dotted lines trace the L-shaped NE-SW and NW-SE filaments (see Figure 1b). In each panel, the positions of the ALMAGAL 1.38 mm continuum cores associated wi… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a) Two-color composite map f405N (Red) + f356W (Turquoise) made from the JWST images, covering the area highlighted by the dot-dashed box in Figure 3a. Fil￾aments (in absorption) are highlighted by arrows. b) Same as Figure 4a, with the ATOMS H13CO+ (1–0) integrated emission contours (green) over [−19.2, −16.4] km s−1 . Con￾tour levels are 0.277 × [0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 0.95] J… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Radial variation of core properties measured from the hub center. a) core number density (ρ, circles), b) core diameter (D, squares). c) core surface density (Σ, triangles), and d) core mass (Mcore, diamonds). The radial distance is logarithmically binned from 1 ′′ to 30′′ (bottom axis), with the corresponding physical scale at d = 2.5 kpc shown on the top axis. Error bars represent 1σ standard deviations.… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: a) Overlay of the visually identified filaments (F1–F4) on the JWST F356W image (inverted color map). The color represents the velocity, while the spine thickness reflects the velocity dispersion. The color bars for the veloc￾ity of each filament are shown on the right. The circle marks the hub region, with its center indicated by a “+” symbol (see Figure 4c). b–e) Longitudinal profiles of velocity (blue c… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Distribution of relative angles between the on-sky velocity gradient and gravity vectors, shown as: a) vector overlay, and b) the alignment measure (AM) parameter, where AM = 1 corresponds to perfectly aligned vectors and AM = −1 indicates perpendicular vectors. The background corresponds to the H13CO+ moment-0 map, with filament spines marked by cyan curves. c) Histogram of the relative angle distribution… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a multi-wavelength study of the massive protocluster G286.21+0.17 (G286) using \emph{JWST} near-infrared imaging and ALMA H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$(1--0) observations. The \emph{JWST} images uncover a compact ($\sim$0.5 pc) hub-filament system (HFS), comprising a dense central hub connected by at least four converging filaments seen in absorption, along with multiple H$_2$ protostellar jets/outflows. The hub hosts dense core G286c1. The H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ emission confirms this HFS over [$-$19.2, $-$16.4]~km~s$^{-1}$. The \emph{JWST} images further trace prominent photodissociation regions around the H\,{\sc ii}~region~A, powered by a B-type star. The radial distribution of ALMAGAL 1.38 mm core properties reveals steep power-law slopes toward the hub center. Within the inner hub (r < 8'', $\sim0.1$~pc), the core number density follows $\rho~[\rm pc^{-2}] \propto r^{-2.4\pm0.5}$, the surface density scales as $\Sigma~[\rm g~cm^{-2}] \propto r^{-1.0\pm0.2}$, and the enclosed core mass varies as $M_{\rm core}~[M_{\odot}] \propto r^{-1.2\pm0.2}$, while core diameters remain approximately constant ($D_{\rm core}~[\rm AU] \propto r^{-0.1\pm0.1}$). These trends, along with filament mass accretion rates of $7\times10^{-6}$--$1.8\times10^{-4}$~$M_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$, support a competitive accretion scenario in which gravitational focusing enhances core growth toward the hub center. Filament linewidths increase from tail/outer-region to head/hub-region, consistent with gravity-driven turbulence. However, the absence of a preferred alignment between velocity gradients and gravitational force directions may indicate a dynamically evolved system. The HFS likely formed through large-scale gas layer interactions and compression by the adjacent H\,{\sc ii} region. Overall, star formation in G286 appears regulated by filamentary accretion, competitive core growth in the hub, and stellar feedback.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents JWST near-IR and ALMA H13CO+(1-0) observations of the massive protocluster G286.21+0.17, identifying a compact (~0.5 pc) hub-filament system with converging filaments, a central dense core, H2 jets, and PDRs around an adjacent HII region. Within r < 8'' (~0.1 pc), ALMAGAL 1.38 mm cores show radial power laws: number density ρ [pc^{-2}] ∝ r^{-2.4±0.5}, surface density Σ [g cm^{-2}] ∝ r^{-1.0±0.2}, enclosed mass M_core [M_⊙] ∝ r^{-1.2±0.2} (with roughly constant diameters), plus filament accretion rates of 7×10^{-6}–1.8×10^{-4} M_⊙ yr^{-1}; these trends plus increasing linewidths toward the hub are interpreted as evidence for competitive accretion via gravitational focusing, with the HFS formed by large-scale interactions and HII compression.

Significance. If the reported radial trends can be shown to be free of dominant projection or completeness biases, the work would supply a useful multi-wavelength case study of hub-filament geometry and core growth in a young massive protocluster, adding to the observational basis for competitive accretion models.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the measured power-law indices (ρ ∝ r^{-2.4±0.5}, Σ ∝ r^{-1.0±0.2}, M_core ∝ r^{-1.2±0.2}) and filament accretion rates directly support competitive accretion via gravitational focusing is not accompanied by quantitative tests against projected null models, line-of-sight effects in a filamentary geometry, or radially dependent detection completeness for the ALMAGAL cores.
  2. [radial distribution of ALMAGAL 1.38 mm core properties] The section on radial core properties: no error analysis details, baseline comparisons to alternative dynamical models, or completeness simulations are supplied, so the interpretive step from the observed 2D distributions to 3D dynamical enhancement remains unverified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The physical scale corresponding to r < 8'' (~0.1 pc) should be stated with an explicit adopted distance to the source.
  2. [radial distribution section] Notation for the power-law indices could be clarified by specifying whether the fits are performed in linear or log space and how uncertainties are derived.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which have helped us clarify the presentation and interpretation of our results. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional caveats, error details, and discussion of potential biases.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the measured power-law indices (ρ ∝ r^{-2.4±0.5}, Σ ∝ r^{-1.0±0.2}, M_core ∝ r^{-1.2±0.2}) and filament accretion rates directly support competitive accretion via gravitational focusing is not accompanied by quantitative tests against projected null models, line-of-sight effects in a filamentary geometry, or radially dependent detection completeness for the ALMAGAL cores.

    Authors: We agree that the original abstract wording presented the interpretation too strongly without explicit qualification. The power-law indices are measured quantities in projection, and the link to competitive accretion via gravitational focusing is based on the observed steep slopes combined with the hub-filament morphology seen in JWST data. In the revised version we have changed the abstract to state that the trends 'are consistent with' competitive accretion, added a sentence noting the 2D nature of the measurements, and inserted a short paragraph in the discussion section addressing line-of-sight effects qualitatively using the observed filament convergence. Full quantitative null-model tests and completeness simulations remain outside the scope of this primarily observational study. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [radial distribution of ALMAGAL 1.38 mm core properties] The section on radial core properties: no error analysis details, baseline comparisons to alternative dynamical models, or completeness simulations are supplied, so the interpretive step from the observed 2D distributions to 3D dynamical enhancement remains unverified.

    Authors: We have expanded Section 3.2 to include the details of the least-squares fitting procedure used to obtain the quoted uncertainties. A baseline comparison to a uniform radial distribution has been added, demonstrating that the observed indices are steeper than expected for a non-focused distribution. We acknowledge the lack of dedicated completeness simulations for the ALMAGAL catalog in this field and have inserted a caveat stating that the reported trends apply to the detected cores; higher central background emission could in principle affect completeness. The multi-wavelength context (converging filaments and increasing linewidths toward the hub) is used to support the dynamical interpretation, but we agree that a full 3D verification would require additional modeling. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational power-law fits to ALMAGAL core data with direct interpretation

full rationale

The paper measures radial distributions of observed ALMAGAL 1.38 mm cores and directly fits the reported power-law indices (ρ ∝ r^{-2.4±0.5}, Σ ∝ r^{-1.0±0.2}, M_core ∝ r^{-1.2±0.2}) to the binned data within r < 8''. These are empirical results from the observations, not quantities derived from the paper's own equations or prior self-citations that reduce to the inputs by construction. Filament accretion rates are likewise computed from measured quantities. The link to competitive accretion is an interpretive statement in the abstract and text, not a self-definitional or fitted-input prediction. No self-citation load-bearing steps, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes appear in the derivation chain. The study is self-contained as an observational report against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are extractable beyond standard domain assumptions in interpreting molecular-line kinematics and dust continuum as tracing core properties.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Molecular line emission in the stated velocity range traces the physical hub-filament structure without significant contamination or optical depth effects
    Invoked to confirm the HFS over [-19.2, -16.4] km s^{-1}

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6108 in / 1353 out tokens · 27325 ms · 2026-06-30T20:38:48.355774+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    J., Tan, J

    Andersen, M., Barnes, P. J., Tan, J. C., Kainulainen, J., & de Marchi, G. 2017, ApJ, 850, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9072 André, P., Di Francesco, J., Ward-Thompson, D., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther, R. S

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9072 2017

  2. [2]

    Klessen, C. P. Dullemond, & T. Henning, 27, doi: 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch002

    work page doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch002

  3. [3]

    G., Borkin, M

    Arce, H. G., Borkin, M. A., Goodman, A. A., Pineda, J. E., & Beaumont, C. N. 2011, ApJ, 742, 105, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/105

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/105 2011

  4. [4]

    2011, A&A, 529, L6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116596

    Arzoumanian, D., André, P., Didelon, P., et al. 2011, A&A, 529, L6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116596

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116596 2011

  5. [5]

    , author Springel , V

    Barnes, P. J., Yonekura, Y., Ryder, S. D., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 73, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15890.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15890.x 2010

  6. [6]

    J., Yonekura, Y., Fukui, Y., et al

    Barnes, P. J., Yonekura, Y., Fukui, Y., et al. 2011, ApJS, 196, 12, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/196/1/12

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/196/1/12 2011

  7. [7]

    A., Rieke, M., Eisenstein, D., et al

    Beichman, C. A., Rieke, M., Eisenstein, D., et al. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8442, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2012: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, ed. M. C. Clampin, G. G. Fazio, H. A. MacEwen, & J. Oschmann, Jacobus M., 84422N, doi: 10.1117/12.925447

    work page doi:10.1117/12.925447 2012

  8. [8]

    A., Churchwell, E., Babler, B

    Benjamin, R. A., Churchwell, E., Babler, B. L., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 953, doi: 10.1086/376696

    work page doi:10.1086/376696 2003

  9. [9]

    K., Dewangan, L

    Bhadari, N. K., Dewangan, L. K., Ojha, D. K., Pirogov, L. E., & Maity, A. K. 2022, ApJ, 930, 169, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac65e9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac65e9 2022

  10. [10]

    K., Dewangan, L

    Bhadari, N. K., Dewangan, L. K., Pirogov, L. E., & Ojha, D. K. 2020, ApJ, 899, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba2c6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba2c6 2020

  11. [11]

    K., Dewangan, L

    Bhadari, N. K., Dewangan, L. K., Jadhav, O. R., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, L18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452189

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452189 2025

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    Bonnell, I. A., Bate, M. R., Clarke, C. J., & Pringle, J. E. 2001, MNRAS, 323, 785, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04270.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04270.x 2001

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Bonnell, I. A., Vine, S. G., & Bate, M. R. 2004, MNRAS, 349, 735, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07543.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07543.x 2004

  14. [14]

    2020a, ApJ, 897, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab93bc

    Cheng, Y., Andersen, M., & Tan, J. 2020a, ApJ, 897, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab93bc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab93bc

  15. [15]

    C., Liu, M., Lim, W., & Andersen, M

    Cheng, Y., Tan, J. C., Liu, M., Lim, W., & Andersen, M. 2020b, ApJ, 894, 87, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab879f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab879f

  16. [16]

    C., Tobin, J

    Cheng, Y., Tan, J. C., Tobin, J. J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 940, 124, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9b54

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9b54 2022

  17. [17]

    S., Allen, D., et al

    Churchwell, E., Povich, M. S., Allen, D., et al. 2006, ApJ, 649, 759, doi: 10.1086/507015

    work page doi:10.1086/507015 2006

  18. [18]

    2025, A&A, 696, A151, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452706

    Coletta, A., Molinari, S., Schisano, E., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A151, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452706

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452706 2025

  19. [19]

    D., et al

    Deharveng, L., Schuller, F., Anderson, L. D., et al. 2010, A&A, 523, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014422

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014422 2010

  20. [20]

    K., Bhadari, N

    Dewangan, L. K., Bhadari, N. K., Maity, A. K., et al. 2024a, MNRAS, 527, 5895, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3384

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3384

  21. [21]

    K., Maity, A

    Dewangan, L. K., Maity, A. K., Mayya, Y. D., et al. 2023, ApJ, 958, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad004b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad004b 2023

  22. [22]

    K., Ojha, D

    Dewangan, L. K., Ojha, D. K., Zinchenko, I., Janardhan, P., & Luna, A. 2017, ApJ, 834, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/22

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/22 2017

  23. [23]

    K., Yadav, R

    Dewangan, L. K., Yadav, R. K., Sharma, S., et al. 2026, AJ, 171, 69, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ae25e7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae25e7 2026

  24. [24]

    K., Jadhav, O

    Dewangan, L. K., Jadhav, O. R., Maity, A. K., et al. 2024b, MNRAS, 528, 3909, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae150

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae150

  25. [25]

    E., & Williams, D

    Dyson, J. E., & Williams, D. A. 1980, Physics of the interstellar medium (New York, Halsted Press), 204

    1980

  26. [26]

    1996, in Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’96)

    Ester, M., Kriegel, H.-P., Sander, J., & Xu, X. 1996, in Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’96). Proceedings of a conference held August 2-4, ed. D. W. Pfitzner & J. K. Salmon, 226–331 Faúndez, S., Bronfman, L., Garay, G., et al. 2004, A&A, 426, 97, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20035755

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20035755 1996

  27. [27]

    Federrath, C., & Klessen, R. S. 2012, ApJ, 761, 156, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/156

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/761/2/156 2012

  28. [28]

    Georgatos, T., & Whitworth, A. P. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.09794, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.09794

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.09794 2026

  29. [29]

    D., Camilo, F., et al

    Goedhart, S., Cotton, W. D., Camilo, F., et al. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 531, 649, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1166

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1166 2024

  30. [30]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.01238, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.01238

    Gupta, S., Baug, T., Soam, A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.01238, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.01238

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.01238 2026

  31. [31]

    R., Dewangan, L

    Jadhav, O. R., Dewangan, L. K., Verma, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 980, 133, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada388

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada388 2025

  32. [32]

    C., Bourke, T

    Kirk, H., Myers, P. C., Bourke, T. L., et al. 2013, ApJ, 766, 115, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/766/2/115

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/766/2/115 2013

  33. [33]

    R., & McKee, C

    Krumholz, M. R., & McKee, C. F. 2008, Nature, 451, 1082, doi: 10.1038/nature06620

    work page doi:10.1038/nature06620 2008

  34. [34]

    a” and “c

    Inutsuka, S. I. 2020, A&A, 642, A87, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038232 16L. K. Dew angan et al. 0.0 2.2 4.4 6.6 8.9 11.1 13.3 c) HII A DEC(J2000) DEC(J2000) RA(J2000) a) b) d) CRS Figure B2.a) SMGPS 1.3 GHz continuum contours (blue) overlaid on the ChaMPS 13CO moment-0 map integrated over [−23.2,−16.4] km s −1. b) Mean 13CO spectrum extracted from the circ...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038232 2020

  35. [35]

    J., Kim, K.-T., et al

    Liu, T., Evans, N. J., Kim, K.-T., et al. 2020a, MNRAS, 496, 2790, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1577 —. 2020b, MNRAS, 496, 2821, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1501

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1577

  36. [36]

    K., Dewangan, L

    Maity, A. K., Dewangan, L. K., Bhadari, N. K., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 5388, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1644

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1644 2023

  37. [37]

    K., Dewangan, L

    Maity, A. K., Dewangan, L. K., Jadhav, O. R., et al. 2025, AJ, 169, 325, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/adcedd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adcedd 2025

  38. [38]

    K., Inoue, T., Fukui, Y., et al

    Maity, A. K., Inoue, T., Fukui, Y., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 229, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7098

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7098 2024

  39. [39]

    2015, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 127, 266, doi: 10.1086/680323

    Mangum, J., & Shirley, Y. 2015, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 127, 266, doi: 10.1086/680323

    work page doi:10.1086/680323 2015

  40. [40]

    2010, Astrophysical Journal, 714, 680, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/714/1/680

    Kitamura, Y. 2010, Astrophysical Journal, 714, 680, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/714/1/680

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/714/1/680 2010

  41. [41]

    N., Evans, N

    Matsakis, D. N., Evans, N. J., I., Sato, T., & Zuckerman, B. 1976, AJ, 81, 172, doi: 10.1086/111871

    work page doi:10.1086/111871 1976

  42. [42]

    2025, A&A, 696, A149, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452702

    Molinari, S., Schilke, P., Battersby, C., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A149, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452702

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452702 2025

  43. [43]

    2025, ApJ, 979, 233, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada27f

    Morii, K., Sanhueza, P., Csengeri, T., et al. 2025, ApJ, 979, 233, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada27f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada27f 2025

  44. [44]

    2018, ARA&A, 56, 41, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055235

    Motte, F., Bontemps, S., & Louvet, F. 2018, ARA&A, 56, 41, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055235

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055235 2018

  45. [45]

    Myers, P. C. 2009, ApJ, 700, 1609, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1609 Müller, H. S. P., Schlöder, F., Stutzki, J., & Winnewisser, G. 2005, Journal of Molecular Structure, 742, 215, doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2005.01.027

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/2/1609 2009

  46. [46]

    2013, A&A, 552, A14, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220218

    Ohlendorf, H., Preibisch, T., Gaczkowski, B., et al. 2013, A&A, 552, A14, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220218

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220218 2013

  47. [47]

    2011, ApJ, 730, 40, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/40

    Padoan, P., & Nordlund, Å. 2011, ApJ, 730, 40, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/40

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/730/1/40 2011

  48. [48]

    2020, ApJ, 900, 82, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abaa47

    Padoan, P., Pan, L., Juvela, M., Haugbølle, T., & Nordlund, Å. 2020, ApJ, 900, 82, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abaa47

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abaa47 2020

  49. [49]

    1973, AJ, 78, 929, doi: 10.1086/111498

    Panagia, N. 1973, AJ, 78, 929, doi: 10.1086/111498

    work page doi:10.1086/111498 1973

  50. [50]

    A., André, P., et al

    Peretto, N., Fuller, G. A., André, P., et al. 2014, A&A, 561, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322172

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322172 2014

  51. [51]

    E., Goodman, A

    Pineda, J. E., Goodman, A. A., & Arce, H. G. 2010, Astrophysical Journal Letters, 712, L116, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/712/1/L116

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/712/1/l116 2010

  52. [52]

    J., Kelly, D., & Horner, S

    Rieke, M. J., Kelly, D., & Horner, S. 2005, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 5904, Cryogenic Optical Systems and Instruments XI, ed. J. B. Heaney & L. G. Burriesci, 1–8, doi: 10.1117/12.615554

    work page doi:10.1117/12.615554 2005

  53. [53]

    , keywords =

    Rigby, J., Perrin, M., McElwain, M., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 048001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acb293

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/acb293 2023

  54. [54]

    M., Padovani, M., et al

    Sanhueza, P., Girart, J. M., Padovani, M., et al. 2021, ApJL, 915, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac081c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac081c 2021

  55. [55]

    2025, ApJ, 980, 87, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9d40

    Sanhueza, P., Liu, J., Morii, K., et al. 2025, ApJ, 980, 87, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9d40

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9d40 2025

  56. [56]

    2024, AJ, 167, 106, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad19cd Tigé, J., Motte, F., Russeil, D., et al

    Sharma, S., Verma, A., Mallick, K., et al. 2024, AJ, 167, 106, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad19cd Tigé, J., Motte, F., Russeil, D., et al. 2017, A&A, 602, A77, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628989 Vázquez-Semadeni, E., Gómez, G. C., Jappsen, A. K.,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad19cd 2024

  57. [57]

    Ballesteros-Paredes, J., & Klessen, R. S. 2009, ApJ, 707, 1023, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/1023 Vázquez-Semadeni, E., González-Samaniego, A., & Colín, P. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 1313, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3229 Vázquez-Semadeni, E., Palau, A., Ballesteros-Paredes, J., Gómez, G. C., & Zamora-Avilés, M. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 3061, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2736

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/707/2/1023 2009

  58. [58]

    M., Tang, Y.-W., et al

    Wang, J.-W., Koch, P. M., Tang, Y.-W., et al. 2022, ApJ, 931, 115, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6872

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6872 2022

  59. [59]

    Wells, M. R. A., Pillsworth, R., Beuther, H., Pudritz, R. E., & Koch, E. W. 2025, A&A, 704, A64, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555118

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555118 2025

  60. [60]

    P., de Geus, E

    Williams, J. P., de Geus, E. J., & Blitz, L. 1994, ApJ, 428, 693, doi: 10.1086/174279

    work page doi:10.1086/174279 1994

  61. [61]

    2023, MNRAS, 520, 3259, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad012

    Xu, F.-W., Wang, K., Liu, T., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 3259, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad012

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad012 2023

  62. [62]

    2023, ApJ, 953, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acdf42

    Yang, D., Liu, H.-L., Tej, A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 953, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acdf42

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acdf42 2023

  63. [63]

    2018, ApJ, 852, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9d40

    Yuan, J., Li, J.-Z., Wu, Y., et al. 2018, ApJ, 852, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9d40

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9d40 2018

  64. [64]

    2021, MNRAS, 508, 4639, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2801

    Zhou, J.-W., Liu, T., Li, J.-Z., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 4639, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2801

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2801 2021

  65. [65]

    J., et al

    Zhou, J.-W., Liu, T., Evans, N. J., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 6038, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1735

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1735 2022

  66. [66]

    S., Schlafly, E

    Zucker, C., Speagle, J. S., Schlafly, E. F., et al. 2020, A&A, 633, A51, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936145

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936145 2020