pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.14875 · v1 · pith:4H24MIQ2new · submitted 2026-05-14 · ✦ hep-ph

Unified study of scalar, vector and tensor two-meson form factors in U(3) resonance chiral theory

Jin Hao , Chun-Gui Duan , Zhi-Hui Guo , J. Oller , J. Ruiz de Elvira This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 20:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords resonance chiral theorytwo-meson form factorsunitarizationscalar form factorsvector form factorstensor form factorsU(3) symmetryfinal-state interactions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two-meson form factors of scalar, vector, and tensor types display distinct resonance structures across channels in U(3) resonance chiral theory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper carries out a systematic calculation of perturbative two-meson form factors for scalar, vector, and anti-symmetric tensor types in both strangeness-conserving and strangeness-changing channels inside U(3) resonance chiral theory. These include one-loop light-flavor pseudoscalar meson loops plus tree-level resonance exchanges. The perturbative results are then unitarized by incorporating meson-meson final-state interactions, and parameters previously determined from scattering studies are used directly to generate numerical predictions for the form factors.

Core claim

Within the U(3) resonance chiral theory the complete perturbative form factors are constructed by adding one-loop pseudoscalar contributions to tree-level resonance exchanges; unitarization via meson-meson final-state interactions then yields form factors whose resonance content differs markedly between scalar, vector, and tensor types and between strangeness-conserving and strangeness-changing channels.

What carries the argument

Unitarized form factors built from one-loop pseudoscalar meson loops, tree-level resonance exchanges, and meson-meson final-state interactions inside U(3) resonance chiral theory.

If this is right

  • The same parameter set yields concrete predictions for form factors in all three tensor types and both strangeness sectors.
  • Resonance structures differ by form-factor type, so vector form factors cannot be assumed to mirror scalar ones.
  • Strangeness-changing channels exhibit resonance patterns distinct from strangeness-conserving ones.
  • The unitarized expressions provide a unified description that can be compared directly with data on meson pair production.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework could be applied to related observables such as meson decay constants or electromagnetic transitions without new fits.
  • Discrepancies between predicted and measured form factors would indicate the need for additional resonance contributions or higher-order loops.
  • The channel-dependent resonance patterns suggest that different form-factor types probe overlapping but non-identical sets of intermediate states.

Load-bearing premise

Values of the low-energy constants fitted to meson-meson scattering data can be transferred without readjustment to predict the corresponding form factors.

What would settle it

A set of precise experimental measurements of two-meson form factors that deviate systematically from the resonance patterns predicted by the unitarized expressions would falsify the direct transfer of scattering parameters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14875 by Chun-Gui Duan, Jin Hao, J. Oller, J. Ruiz de Elvira, Zhi-Hui Guo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Feynman diagrams for the two-meson FFs. The wiggly lines denote the 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Feynman diagrams contributing to the pNGB self-energy. The meanings of the 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Scalar ππ FFs of the isoscalar quark currents: F (¯uu+dd¯ )/ √ 2 S,ππ (left) and F ss¯ S,ππ (right). In each panel, the black solid curve shows the modulus as a function of the ππ energy, obtained with the parameter set of Fit I. The light-gray shaded areas indicate the corresponding error bands obtained by propagating the parameter uncertainties of Fit I. The real and imaginary parts from Fit I are denote… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Scalar KK¯ FFs of the isoscalar quark currents: F (¯uu+dd¯ )/ √ 2 S,KK¯ (left) and F ss¯ S,KK¯ (right). The line styles and shaded bands follow the same conventions as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Scalar ηη FFs: F (¯uu+dd¯ )/ √ 2 S,ηη (left) and F ss¯ S,ηη (right). The line styles and shaded bands follow the same conventions as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Scalar πη (left), KK¯ (middle) and πη′ (right) FFs of the isovector quark current ¯ud: F ud¯ S,πη, F ud¯ S,KK¯ , and F ud¯ S,πη′. The blue dashed curves show the modulus using the parameter set of the NLO fit obtained in Ref. [67]. All other line styles and shaded bands follow the same conventions as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Scalar Kπ¯ (left), Kη ¯ (middle) and Kη ¯ ′ (right) FFs of the isospin-1/2 quark current us¯ : F us¯ S,Kπ¯ , F us¯ S,Kη ¯ and F us¯ S,Kη ¯ ′ . The line styles and shaded bands follow the same conventions as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Vector ππ (left) and KK¯ (right) FFs of the isovector quark current ¯uγµd: F ud¯ +,ππ and F ud¯ +,KK¯ . The line styles and shaded bands follow the same conventions as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Vector Kπ¯ (left) and Kη ¯ (right) FFs of the isospin-1/2 quark current ¯uγµ s: F us¯ +,Kπ¯ and F us¯ +,Kη ¯ . The line styles and shaded bands follow the same conventions as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Vector KK¯ FFs of the isoscalar quark currents (¯uγµu + ¯dγµd)/ √ 2 (left) and ¯sγµ s (right): F (¯uu+dd¯ )/ √ 2 +,KK¯ and F ss¯ +,KK¯ . The line styles and shaded bands follow the same conventions as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Tensor ππ (left) and KK¯ (right) FFs of the isovector quark current ¯uσµνd: F ud¯ T,ππ and F ud¯ T,KK¯ . The line styles and shaded bands follow the same conventions as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Comparison of the normalized |F ud¯ T,ππ(s)/Fud¯ T,ππ(0)| obtained using different ap￾proaches. The black solid line shows the result of Fit I from the present work, while the light gray shaded band indicates the uncertainty range obtained from the parameter errors of Fit I. The red dashed line and the blue dash-dot line represent the curves obtained using the parameter values from Original Fit and Fit 2 … view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Tensor Kπ¯ (left) and Kη ¯ (right) FFs of the isospin-1/2 quark current ¯uσµνs: F us¯ T,Kπ¯ and F us¯ T,Kη ¯ . The line styles and shaded bands follow the same conventions as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: displays the tensor FFs for the KK¯ channel induced by the isoscalar quark currents (¯uσµνu + ¯dσµνd)/ √ 2 and ¯sσµνs. A clear symmetric resonance peak from the ϕ(1020) is found in F ss¯ T,KK¯ , which dominates the behavior of this FF throughout the region below 1.2 GeV. On the other hand, an asymmetric peak structure is seen in F (¯uu+dd¯ )/ √ 2 T,KK¯ around 1 GeV. This latter tensor FF also develops a z… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We perform a systematic study of two-meson form factors of the scalar, vector, and anti-symmetric tensor types within the framework of the $U(3)$ resonance chiral theory. The complete perturbative form factors in both the strangeness-conserving and strangeness-changing channels are calculated by incorporating one-loop light-flavor pseudoscalar meson contributions and tree-level resonance exchanges. With these newly calculated chiral results, we construct the corresponding unitarized form factors by incorporating meson-meson final-state interactions. The parameter values obtained in previous meson-meson scattering studies are then exploited to predict the corresponding form factors. Different types of form factors are found to exhibit rather distinct resonance structures across channels.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper performs a systematic study of scalar, vector, and anti-symmetric tensor two-meson form factors in U(3) resonance chiral theory. It calculates the complete perturbative expressions incorporating one-loop light-flavor pseudoscalar contributions and tree-level resonance exchanges in both strangeness-conserving and strangeness-changing channels, constructs unitarized versions that include meson-meson final-state interactions, and uses parameter values fixed in prior meson-meson scattering analyses to generate predictions. The central result is that the different types of form factors exhibit rather distinct resonance structures across channels.

Significance. If the parameter transfer is validated, the work supplies a unified, resonance-saturated framework for form factors that re-uses the same LECs and couplings already constrained by scattering, potentially allowing consistent predictions for electromagnetic and weak processes. The inclusion of tensor form factors alongside scalar and vector ones is a methodological strength not commonly found in the literature.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (and the corresponding numerical section): the headline claim of distinct resonance structures rests on inserting scattering-fit parameters unchanged into the new form-factor expressions. No comparison of the resulting form factors to experimental data (e.g., electromagnetic or weak form-factor measurements) or sensitivity study on parameter variations is reported; this directly affects whether the observed structures are genuine predictions or artifacts of the imported values.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'complete perturbative form factors' are calculated but does not indicate whether the one-loop integrals are evaluated in dimensional regularization or with a cutoff; explicit expressions or a reference to the regularization scheme would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We provide a point-by-point response to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and the corresponding numerical section): the headline claim of distinct resonance structures rests on inserting scattering-fit parameters unchanged into the new form-factor expressions. No comparison of the resulting form factors to experimental data (e.g., electromagnetic or weak form-factor measurements) or sensitivity study on parameter variations is reported; this directly affects whether the observed structures are genuine predictions or artifacts of the imported values.

    Authors: The referee correctly observes that the manuscript does not include direct comparisons of the predicted form factors to experimental data nor a sensitivity analysis on the imported parameters. Our study is designed to explore the implications of transferring the resonance parameters and low-energy constants fixed in meson-meson scattering analyses to the calculation of scalar, vector, and tensor form factors within the same U(3) resonance chiral theory framework. The observed distinct resonance structures arise from the different Lorentz structures and resonance contributions in each channel. We agree that including a sensitivity study would help confirm the robustness of these structures. In the revised manuscript, we will add an analysis of the dependence on parameter variations within the ranges determined by the scattering fits. Direct comparisons to data are beyond the present scope as they would necessitate additional modeling of electromagnetic and weak currents, which we intend to pursue separately. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: scattering-fit parameters serve as external inputs for independent form-factor predictions

full rationale

The paper calculates complete perturbative form factors (one-loop light pseudoscalars plus tree-level resonances) in U(3) RChT for scalar, vector and tensor channels, then unitarizes them via final-state interactions. It states that 'parameter values obtained in previous meson-meson scattering studies are then exploited to predict the corresponding form factors.' These parameters originate from separate scattering analyses and are not re-fitted or adjusted here against form-factor data. No equation reduces a form-factor quantity to itself by construction, no fitted input is relabeled as a prediction within this manuscript, and no self-citation chain supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem. The derivation remains self-contained against external scattering benchmarks; the reported distinct resonance structures are outputs of the theory evaluated at those fixed external values.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Ledger constructed from abstract only; full parameter count and derivation details unavailable.

free parameters (1)
  • meson-meson scattering parameters
    Values obtained from previous studies are used directly to generate the form-factor predictions
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption U(3) resonance chiral theory is the appropriate framework for both perturbative and unitarized two-meson form factors
    The entire calculation is performed inside this framework without independent justification in the abstract
  • domain assumption One-loop pseudoscalar contributions plus tree-level resonance exchanges suffice for the perturbative form factors
    Stated as the method used to obtain the chiral results

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5659 in / 1411 out tokens · 42107 ms · 2026-06-30T20:22:15.627177+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · 38 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B250, 517 (1985)

    1985

  2. [2]

    Weinberg, Physica A96, 327 (1979)

    S. Weinberg, Physica A96, 327 (1979)

    1979

  3. [3]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Annals Phys.158, 142 (1984)

    1984

  4. [4]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B250, 465 (1985)

    1985

  5. [5]

    Gasser and U

    J. Gasser and U. G. Meissner, Nucl. Phys. B357, 90 (1991)

    1991

  6. [6]

    The Vector and Scalar Form Factors of the Pion to Two Loops

    J. Bijnens, G. Colangelo, and P. Talavera, JHEP05, 014, arXiv:hep-ph/9805389

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Pion and Kaon Electromagnetic Form Factors

    J. Bijnens and P. Talavera, JHEP03, 046, arXiv:hep-ph/0203049

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Scalar Form Factors in SU(3) Chiral Perturbation Theory

    J. Bijnens and P. Dhonte, JHEP10, 061, arXiv:hep-ph/0307044

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Ecker, J

    G. Ecker, J. Gasser, A. Pich, and E. de Rafael, Nucl. Phys. B321, 311 (1989)

    1989

  10. [10]

    J. R. Pelaez, Phys. Rept.658, 1 (2016), arXiv:1510.00653 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    J. A. Oller, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.110, 103728 (2020), arXiv:1909.00370 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Yao, L.-Y

    D.-L. Yao, L.-Y. Dai, H.-Q. Zheng, and Z.-Y. Zhou, Rept. Prog. Phys.84, 076201 (2021), arXiv:2009.13495 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    J. R. Pel´ aez, A. Rodas, and J. R. de Elvira, Eur. Phys. J. ST230, 1539 (2021), arXiv:2101.06506 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Omnes, Nuovo Cim.8, 316 (1958)

    R. Omnes, Nuovo Cim.8, 316 (1958)

    1958

  15. [15]

    K. M. Watson, Phys. Rev.88, 1163 (1952)

    1952

  16. [16]

    Shi, C.-Y

    Y.-J. Shi, C.-Y. Seng, F.-K. Guo, B. Kubis, U.-G. Meißner, and W. Wang, JHEP04, 086, arXiv:2011.00921 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2011

  17. [17]

    Von Detten, F

    L. Von Detten, F. No¨ el, C. Hanhart, M. Hoferichter, and B. Kubis, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 420 (2021), arXiv:2103.01966 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    M. Kirk, B. Kubis, M. Reboud, and D. van Dyk, Phys. Lett. B861, 139266 (2025), arXiv:2410.13764 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    N. C. Balz, F. Herren, B. Kubis, S. Mutke, and M. Reboud, JHEP01, 158, arXiv:2510.25584 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  20. [20]

    J. A. Oller and E. Oset, Nucl. Phys. A629, 739 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9706487

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  21. [21]

    J. A. Oller, Phys. Lett. B426, 7 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9803214 . 30

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  22. [22]

    Z.-H. Guo, J. A. Oller, and J. Ruiz de Elvira, Phys. Lett. B712, 407 (2012), arXiv:1203.4381 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  23. [23]

    Z.-H. Guo, J. A. Oller, and J. Ruiz de Elvira, Phys. Rev. D86, 054006 (2012), arXiv:1206.4163 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  24. [24]

    J. A. Oller, E. Oset, and J. E. Palomar, Phys. Rev. D63, 114009 (2001), arXiv:hep- ph/0011096

    work page arXiv 2001

  25. [25]

    Quantum Loops in the Resonance Chiral Theory: The Vector Form Factor

    I. Rosell, J. J. Sanz-Cillero, and A. Pich, JHEP08, 042, arXiv:hep-ph/0407240

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    A. Pich, I. Rosell, and J. J. Sanz-Cillero, JHEP02, 109, arXiv:1011.5771 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    Strangeness-changing scalar form factors

    M. Jamin, J. A. Oller, and A. Pich, Nucl. Phys. B622, 279 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0110193

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  28. [28]

    Bethe-Salpeter Approach for Unitarized Chiral Perturbation Theory

    J. Nieves and E. Ruiz Arriola, Nucl. Phys. A679, 57 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9907469

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  29. [29]

    Chiral Perturbation Theory with tensor sources

    O. Cata and V. Mateu, JHEP09, 078, arXiv:0705.2948 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    A no-go theorem for non-standard explanations of the $\tau\to K_S\pi\nu_\tau$ CP asymmetry

    V. Cirigliano, A. Crivellin, and M. Hoferichter, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 141803 (2018), arXiv:1712.06595 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    J. A. Miranda and P. Roig, JHEP11, 038, arXiv:1806.09547 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    D. A. L. Aguilar, J. Rend´ on, and P. Roig, JHEP01, 105, arXiv:2409.05588 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    Chen, X.-Q

    F.-Z. Chen, X.-Q. Li, Y.-D. Yang, and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D100, 113006 (2019), arXiv:1909.05543 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Chen, X.-Q

    F.-Z. Chen, X.-Q. Li, S.-C. Peng, Y.-D. Yang, and H.-H. Zhang, JHEP01, 108, arXiv:2107.12310 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    Hoferichter, B

    M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, J. Ruiz de Elvira, and P. Stoffer, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 122001 (2019), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 124, 199901 (2020)], arXiv:1811.11181 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    J. A. Oller and E. Oset, Nucl. Phys. A620, 438 (1997), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.A 652, 407–409 (1999)], arXiv:hep-ph/9702314

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  37. [37]

    J. A. Oller and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D60, 074023 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9809337

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  38. [38]

    J. A. Oller and U. G. Meissner, Phys. Lett. B500, 263 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0011146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  39. [39]

    S-wave Kpi scattering in chiral perturbation theory with resonances

    M. Jamin, J. A. Oller, and A. Pich, Nucl. Phys. B587, 331 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0006045

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  40. [40]

    Resonances from meson-meson scattering in U(3) CHPT

    Z.-H. Guo and J. A. Oller, Phys. Rev. D84, 034005 (2011), arXiv:1104.2849 [hep-ph] . 31

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  41. [41]

    Large-Nc Properties of the rho and f0(600) Mesons from Unitary Resonance Chiral Dynamics

    J. Nieves, A. Pich, and E. Ruiz Arriola, Phys. Rev. D84, 096002 (2011), arXiv:1107.3247 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  42. [42]

    Large-$N_c$ naturalness in coupled-channel meson-meson scattering

    T. Ledwig, J. Nieves, A. Pich, E. Ruiz Arriola, and J. Ruiz de Elvira, Phys. Rev. D90, 114020 (2014), arXiv:1407.3750 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  43. [43]

    A Dispersive Analysis on the $f_0(600)$ and $f_0(980)$ Resonances in $\gamma\gamma\to\pi^+\pi^-, \pi^0\pi^0$ Processes

    Y. Mao, X.-G. Wang, O. Zhang, H. Q. Zheng, and Z. Y. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D79, 116008 (2009), arXiv:0904.1445 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  44. [44]

    Comprehensive Amplitude Analysis of $\gamma\gamma \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-, \pi^0\pi^0$ and $\overline{K} K$ below 1.5 GeV

    L.-Y. Dai and M. R. Pennington, Phys. Rev. D90, 036004 (2014), arXiv:1404.7524 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  45. [45]

    Arteaga, L.-Y

    S. Arteaga, L.-Y. Dai, A. Guevara, and P. Roig, Phys. Rev. D106, 096016 (2022), arXiv:2209.15537 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    Gonz` alez-Sol´ ıs, A

    S. Gonz` alez-Sol´ ıs, A. Miranda, J. Rend´ on, and P. Roig, Phys. Rev. D101, 034010 (2020), arXiv:1911.08341 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    Predictions on the second-class current decays $\tau^{-}\to\pi^{-}\eta^{(\prime)}\nu_{\tau}$

    R. Escribano, S. Gonzalez-Solis, and P. Roig, Phys. Rev. D94, 034008 (2016), arXiv:1601.03989 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    $\tau^-\to K^-\eta^{(\prime)}\nu_\tau$ decays in Chiral Perturbation Theory with Resonances

    R. Escribano, S. Gonzalez-Solis, and P. Roig, JHEP10, 039, arXiv:1307.7908 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    J. J. Sanz-Cillero and O. Shekhovtsova, JHEP12, 080, arXiv:1707.01137 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    Spectral distribution for the decay tau -> nu_tau K pi

    M. Jamin, A. Pich, and J. Portoles, Phys. Lett. B640, 176 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0605096

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  51. [51]

    Effective Field Theory Description of the Pion Form Factor

    F. Guerrero and A. Pich, Phys. Lett. B412, 382 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9707347

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  52. [52]

    Chen, C.-G

    C. Chen, C.-G. Duan, and Z.-H. Guo, JHEP08, 144, arXiv:2201.12764 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    Study of tau- --> V P- nu(tau) in the framework of resonance chiral theory

    Z.-H. Guo, Phys. Rev. D78, 033004 (2008), arXiv:0806.4322 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  54. [54]

    One meson radiative tau decays

    Z.-H. Guo and P. Roig, Phys. Rev. D82, 113016 (2010), arXiv:1009.2542 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  55. [55]

    Z.-X. Li, A. Li, J. Hao, C.-G. Duan, and Z.-H. Guo, Phys. Rev. D113, 014005 (2026), arXiv:2510.04172 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Unified study of two-meson and axion-meson production from semileptonic tau decays within resonance chiral framework

    J. Hao, C.-G. Duan, and Z.-H. Guo, Front. Phys. (Beijing)21, 076201 (2026), arXiv:2507.00383 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    L. Y. Dai, J. Portoles, and O. Shekhovtsova, Phys. Rev. D88, 056001 (2013), arXiv:1305.5751 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  58. [58]

    S.-J. Wang, Z. Fang, and L.-Y. Dai, JHEP07, 037, arXiv:2302.08859 [hep-ph] . 32

    work page arXiv

  59. [59]

    B.-H. Qin, W. Qin, and L.-Y. Dai, Phys. Rev. D111, 034025 (2025), arXiv:2403.14294 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Chiral Effective Lagrangian in the large-Nc limit: the nonet case

    P. Herrera-Siklody, J. I. Latorre, P. Pascual, and J. Taron, Nucl. Phys. B497, 345 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9610549

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  61. [61]

    Large N_c in chiral perturbation theory

    R. Kaiser and H. Leutwyler, Eur. Phys. J. C17, 623 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0007101

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  62. [62]

    Witten, Nucl

    E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B156, 269 (1979)

    1979

  63. [63]

    S. R. Coleman and E. Witten, Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 100 (1980)

    1980

  64. [64]

    Di Vecchia and G

    P. Di Vecchia and G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B171, 253 (1980)

    1980

  65. [65]

    Kawarabayashi and N

    K. Kawarabayashi and N. Ohta, Nucl. Phys. B175, 477 (1980)

    1980

  66. [66]

    J. A. Oller, E. Oset, and J. R. Pelaez, Phys. Rev. D59, 074001 (1999), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 60, 099906 (1999), Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 75, 099903 (2007)], arXiv:hep- ph/9804209

    work page arXiv 1999

  67. [67]

    Z.-H. Guo, L. Liu, U.-G. Meißner, J. A. Oller, and A. Rusetsky, Phys. Rev. D95, 054004 (2017), arXiv:1609.08096 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  68. [68]

    J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, and D. J. Wilson (Hadron Spectrum), Phys. Rev. D93, 094506 (2016), arXiv:1602.05122 [hep-ph] . 33

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016