pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15262 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-14 · ✦ hep-ph

USMEFT as a tool for discovery of universal new physics at high luminosity LHC

Tyler Corbett , Jay Desai , O. J. P. Eboli , M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia , Matheus Martines This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 15:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords Universal SMEFTDrell-Yan productionhigh-luminosity LHCnew physicseffective field theorydilepton processesvector bosonsminimal bias fits
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Universal SMEFT fits to pseudo-data from vector bosons can both detect new physics and measure its properties in Drell-Yan processes at the high-luminosity LHC.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether the Universal SMEFT framework, which parametrizes universal beyond-Standard-Model effects with a minimal set of operators, can serve as a practical discovery tool for new physics in neutral and charged dilepton production. The authors generate pseudo-data that includes contributions from hypothetical new vector bosons and then perform fits that assume only the SMEFT structure. These fits recover both the presence of new physics and the numerical values of the underlying parameters, and the recovery remains consistent when the effective-field-theory expansion is truncated at different orders.

Core claim

Fits performed in the Universal SMEFT to pseudo-data for neutral and charged Drell-Yan production that contain beyond-Standard-Model vector-boson contributions can simultaneously reveal the existence of new physics and extract its parameters with good accuracy; the extracted results are stable under changes in the order at which the effective field theory is truncated.

What carries the argument

Universal SMEFT (USMEFT), a restricted effective-field-theory framework that encodes only universal new-physics effects through a minimal set of higher-dimensional operators.

If this is right

  • Minimal-bias SMEFT fits can both establish the presence of new physics and determine its quantitative properties.
  • The extracted new-physics parameters remain reliable when the effective-field-theory series is truncated at different orders.
  • The same approach applies equally to neutral and charged Drell-Yan channels at the high-luminosity LHC.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar minimal-bias fits could be applied to other LHC processes that are sensitive to universal new physics.
  • The stability under truncation suggests that early data could already yield useful constraints before higher-order calculations are completed.
  • Combining the extracted parameters with measurements from other collider channels might further reduce theoretical uncertainties.

Load-bearing premise

The contributions of beyond-Standard-Model vector bosons to dilepton production can be captured by the Universal SMEFT without large model-specific corrections or important higher-order effects.

What would settle it

If real high-luminosity LHC dilepton data, once analyzed in the same Universal SMEFT framework, yield parameter values that change substantially when the truncation order is increased or fail to describe the observed distributions at the level seen in the pseudo-data studies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15262 by Jay Desai, Matheus Martines, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, O. J. P. Eboli, Tyler Corbett.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The left (right) panel displays the expect number of events distribution as a function of the invariant (transverse) mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. One-dimensional projections of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Allowed one sigma regions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Allowed one sigma regions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We analyze the potential of the Universal SMEFT as a tool to study universal new physics in the neutral and charged Drell-Yan processes at the high-luminosity LHC. In order to do so, we generated pseudo-data containing the contributions of beyond the standard model vector bosons to the dilepton production. Our results show that fits with the minimal theoretical bias can be used not only to unveil the existence of new physics but also to accurately extract its properties. Moreover, the results are rather stable with respect to the order of truncation of the effective field theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the Universal SMEFT (USMEFT) as a tool for discovering and characterizing universal new physics in neutral and charged Drell-Yan processes at the high-luminosity LHC. Pseudo-data are generated that incorporate contributions from BSM vector bosons to dilepton production; these are then fit using SMEFT operators with minimal theoretical bias. The central claims are that such fits can both detect the presence of new physics and accurately extract its properties, and that the results remain stable when the EFT truncation order is varied.

Significance. If the claims are substantiated, the work would demonstrate a practical, low-bias application of USMEFT for new-physics searches in high-statistics Drell-Yan channels, with the reported truncation stability being a useful feature for EFT phenomenology. The approach could complement direct searches for vector resonances. The significance is limited, however, by the absence of explicit validation that the chosen BSM models produce effects fully captured by the universal operator basis up to the truncation employed.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Methods (pseudo-data generation and model assumptions): The claim that BSM vector-boson contributions are faithfully reproduced by a finite set of universal SMEFT operators is load-bearing for both the extraction of properties and the reported stability. The manuscript should explicitly demonstrate that the generated pseudo-data match the SMEFT predictions (including any propagator or width effects) within the truncation, or quantify the size of non-universal or higher-dimensional corrections that are omitted.
  2. [Results] Results (truncation-order stability): The statement that results are 'rather stable' with respect to truncation order is central to the robustness claim. The paper should report the numerical values of the best-fit Wilson coefficients, their uncertainties, and the fit quality (e.g., chi-squared per degree of freedom) for at least two consecutive truncation orders so that the degree of stability can be assessed quantitatively rather than qualitatively.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from stating the assumed integrated luminosity and center-of-mass energy for the HL-LHC projections.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the Wilson coefficients and the precise definition of 'minimal theoretical bias' should be introduced with a short table or explicit list in the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods (pseudo-data generation and model assumptions): The claim that BSM vector-boson contributions are faithfully reproduced by a finite set of universal SMEFT operators is load-bearing for both the extraction of properties and the reported stability. The manuscript should explicitly demonstrate that the generated pseudo-data match the SMEFT predictions (including any propagator or width effects) within the truncation, or quantify the size of non-universal or higher-dimensional corrections that are omitted.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit validation of the matching between the BSM pseudo-data and the USMEFT predictions strengthens the central claims. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) that directly compares the differential cross sections generated from the BSM vector-boson models with the corresponding USMEFT predictions at the truncation orders used. This comparison will include a discussion of propagator and width effects and will quantify the residual differences attributable to non-universal or higher-dimensional operators within the kinematic acceptance of the HL-LHC analysis. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results (truncation-order stability): The statement that results are 'rather stable' with respect to truncation order is central to the robustness claim. The paper should report the numerical values of the best-fit Wilson coefficients, their uncertainties, and the fit quality (e.g., chi-squared per degree of freedom) for at least two consecutive truncation orders so that the degree of stability can be assessed quantitatively rather than qualitatively.

    Authors: We accept that a quantitative presentation would allow a more precise evaluation of stability. The current manuscript illustrates stability through overlapping posterior distributions in figures; we will supplement this with a table that reports the best-fit Wilson coefficients, their 68% uncertainties, and the chi-squared per degree of freedom for the two leading truncation orders employed. This addition will be placed in the results section and will be accompanied by a brief discussion of the observed numerical stability. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation or validation chain

full rationale

The paper generates independent pseudo-data from explicit BSM vector-boson models and then performs SMEFT fits to test recovery of new-physics signals and stability under truncation order. This is a standard Monte-Carlo validation procedure whose inputs (specific BSM Lagrangians) are external to the fitting framework and whose outputs are statistical comparisons rather than tautological re-statements of the inputs. No equations or sections reduce a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, no load-bearing self-citation chain is invoked to justify universality, and the central claim remains an empirical test rather than a self-referential definition. The approach is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis depends on the assumption that the BSM vector boson effects are representable in the SMEFT without additional model-specific details.

free parameters (1)
  • SMEFT Wilson coefficients
    These are fitted to the pseudo-data to extract new physics properties.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption New physics contributions to Drell-Yan can be captured by universal SMEFT operators
    This allows the fits to unveil and characterize the new physics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5633 in / 1406 out tokens · 56467 ms · 2026-05-19T15:50:06.931292+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · 18 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    topology driven

    following the relations presented in [58]. The part of the dimension-eight Lagrangian relevant to our analysis of Drell-Yan in the rotated basis is then given by: L8 =− g2g′2 β2 8M4 1 (1 +β 2)Q (2) H 6 − gg ′2 β2 8M4 1 (1 +β 2)Q (2) ψ2H 4D + g′β2 4M4 1 Q(1) ψ2H 2D3 − β2 2M4 1 Q(2) ψ4D2 + g′2 β4 4M4 1 Q(4) ψ4H 2 +· · ·.(3.13) The ellipses denotes 19 additi...

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033 2025

  2. [2]

    S. D. Drell and T.-M. Yan, Massive Lepton Pair Production in Hadron-Hadron Collisions at High-Energies, Phys. Rev. Lett.25, 316 (1970), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 25, 902 (1970)]

    work page 1970

  3. [3]

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of the double-differential high-mass Drell-Yan cross section in pp collisions at √s= 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP08, 009, arXiv:1606.01736 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    Measurements of differential and double-differential Drell-Yan cross sections in proton-proton collisions at 8 TeV

    V. Khachatryanet al.(CMS), Measurements of differential and double-differential Drell-Yan cross sections in proton-proton collisions at 8 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 147 (2015), arXiv:1412.1115 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  5. [5]

    Walia (CMS), Single and Double Differential Drell-Yan Cross Section Measurements Using the CMS Detector, Springer Proc

    G. Walia (CMS), Single and Double Differential Drell-Yan Cross Section Measurements Using the CMS Detector, Springer Proc. Phys.203, 517 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    A. Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Measurement of the Drell–Yan forward-backward asymmetry and of the effective leptonic weak mixing angle in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, (2024), arXiv:2408.07622 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of double-differential charged-current Drell-Yan cross-sections at high transverse masses inppcollisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, (2025), arXiv:2502.21088 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Search for high-mass dilepton resonances using 139 fb −1 ofppcollision data collected at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Search for high-mass dilepton resonances using 139 fb −1 ofppcollision data collected at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B796, 68 (2019), arXiv:1903.06248 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.(CMS), Search for resonant and nonresonant new phenomena in high-mass dilepton final states at√s= 13 TeV, JHEP07, 208, arXiv:2103.02708 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Search for a heavy charged boson in events with a charged lepton and missing transverse momentum fromppcollisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Search for a heavy charged boson in events with a charged lepton and missing transverse momentum fromppcollisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D100, 052013 (2019), arXiv:1906.05609 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    A. Tumasyanet al.(CMS), Search for new physics in the lepton plus missing transverse momentum final state in proton- proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, JHEP07, 067, arXiv:2202.06075 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B716, 1 (2012), arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  13. [13]

    Search for $WW/WZ$ resonance production in $\ell \nu qq$ final states in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    M. Aaboudet al.(ATLAS), Search forW W/W Zresonance production inℓνqqfinal states inppcollisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP03, 042, arXiv:1710.07235 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Dawson, S

    S. Dawson, S. Homiller, and S. D. Lane, Putting standard model EFT fits to work, Phys. Rev. D102, 055012 (2020), arXiv:2007.01296 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Dawson, S

    S. Dawson, S. Homiller, and M. Sullivan, Impact of dimension-eight SMEFT contributions: A case study, Phys. Rev. D 104, 115013 (2021), arXiv:2110.06929 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Madigan, K. Mimasu, V. Sanz, and T. You, Top, Higgs, Diboson and Electroweak Fit to the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, JHEP04, 279, arXiv:2012.02779 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2012

  17. [17]

    Dawson, M

    S. Dawson, M. Forslund, and M. Schnubel, SMEFT matching to Z’ models at dimension eight, Phys. Rev. D110, 015002 (2024), arXiv:2404.01375 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Adhikary, T

    N. Adhikary, T. Biswas, J. Chakrabortty, C. Englert, and M. Spannowsky, Electroweak scalar effects beyond dimension-six in SMEFT, Phys. Rev. D113, 036003 (2026), arXiv:2501.12160 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    Dawson, D

    S. Dawson, D. Fontes, S. Homiller, and M. Sullivan, Role of dimension-eight operators in an EFT for the 2HDM, Phys. Rev. D106, 055012 (2022), arXiv:2205.01561 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Ellis, K

    J. Ellis, K. Mimasu, and F. Zampedri, Dimension-8 SMEFT analysis of minimal scalar field extensions of the Standard Model, JHEP10, 051, arXiv:2304.06663 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    Corbett, Top-down and bottom-up: Studying the SMEFT beyond leading order in 1/Λ 2, SciPost Phys

    T. Corbett, Top-down and bottom-up: Studying the SMEFT beyond leading order in 1/Λ 2, SciPost Phys. Core7, 053 (2024), arXiv:2405.04570 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Brivio, S

    I. Brivio, S. Bruggisser, E. Geoffray, W. Killian, M. Kr¨ amer, M. Luchmann, T. Plehn, and B. Summ, From models to SMEFT and back?, SciPost Phys.12, 036 (2022), arXiv:2108.01094 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    ter Hoeve, G

    J. ter Hoeve, G. Magni, J. Rojo, A. N. Rossia, and E. Vryonidou, The automation of SMEFT-assisted constraints on UV-complete models, JHEP01, 179, arXiv:2309.04523 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  24. [24]

    Greljo and A

    A. Greljo and A. Palavri´ c, Leading directions in the SMEFT, JHEP09, 009, arXiv:2305.08898 [hep-ph]. 19

    work page arXiv

  25. [25]

    Greljo, A

    A. Greljo, A. Palavri´ c, and A. Smolkoviˇ c, Leading directions in the SMEFT: Renormalization effects, Phys. Rev. D109, 075033 (2024), arXiv:2312.09179 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Hirsch, L

    M. Hirsch, L. Mantani, and V. Sanz, Data-Driven Discovery Strategy for Standard Model Effective Field Theory Searches, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 241801 (2025), arXiv:2507.11109 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    D. Liu, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi, and F. Riva, Patterns of Strong Coupling for LHC Searches, JHEP11, 141, arXiv:1603.03064 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    A basis of dimension-eight operators for anomalous neutral triple gauge boson interactions

    C. Degrande, A basis of dimension-eight operators for anomalous neutral triple gauge boson interactions, JHEP02, 101, arXiv:1308.6323 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Alioli, R

    S. Alioli, R. Boughezal, E. Mereghetti, and F. Petriello, Novel angular dependence in Drell-Yan lepton production via dimension-8 operators, Phys. Lett. B809, 135703 (2020), arXiv:2003.11615 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    S. Alte, M. K¨ onig, and W. Shepherd, Consistent Searches for SMEFT Effects in Non-Resonant Dilepton Events, JHEP 07, 144, arXiv:1812.07575 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    Boughezal, E

    R. Boughezal, E. Mereghetti, and F. Petriello, Dilepton production in the SMEFT at O(1/Λ 4), Phys. Rev. D104, 095022 (2021), arXiv:2106.05337 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Boughezal, Y

    R. Boughezal, Y. Huang, and F. Petriello, Exploring the SMEFT at dimension eight with Drell-Yan transverse momentum measurements, Phys. Rev. D106, 036020 (2022), arXiv:2207.01703 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Kim and A

    T. Kim and A. Martin, Monolepton production in SMEFT toO(1/Λ 4) and beyond, JHEP09, 124, arXiv:2203.11976 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  34. [34]

    Allwicher, D

    L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, F. Jaffredo, O. Sumensari, and F. Wilsch, Drell-Yan tails beyond the Standard Model, JHEP 03, 064, arXiv:2207.10714 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    Allwicher, D

    L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, F. Jaffredo, O. Sumensari, and F. Wilsch, HighPT: A tool for high-p T Drell-Yan tails beyond the standard model, Comput. Phys. Commun.289, 108749 (2023), arXiv:2207.10756 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Allwicher, D

    L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, M. Martines, O. Sumensari, and F. Wilsch, On the EFT validity for Drell-Yan tails at the LHC, (2024), arXiv:2412.14162 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Corbett, J

    T. Corbett, J. Desai, O. J. P. Eboli, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Martines, and P. Reimitz, Drell-Yan production in universal theories beyond dimension-six SMEFT, Phys. Rev. D112, 013009 (2025), arXiv:2503.19962 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Precision Measurement with Diboson at the LHC

    D. Liu and L.-T. Wang, Precision Measurement with Diboson at the LHC, (2018), arXiv:1804.08688 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  39. [39]

    Degrande and H.-L

    C. Degrande and H.-L. Li, Impact of Dimension-8 SMEFT operators on Diboson Productions, (2023), arXiv:2303.10493 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Corbett, J

    T. Corbett, J. Desai, O. J. P. ´Eboli, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Martines, and P. Reimitz, Impact of dimension-eight SMEFT operators in the electroweak precision observables and triple gauge couplings analysis in universal SMEFT, Phys. Rev. D107, 115013 (2023), arXiv:2304.03305 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Martin, A case study of SMEFTO 1/Λ4 effects in diboson processes: pp→W(ℓν)γ, JHEP05, 223, arXiv:2312.09867 [hep-ph]

    A. Martin, A case study of SMEFTO 1/Λ4 effects in diboson processes: pp→W(ℓν)γ, JHEP05, 223, arXiv:2312.09867 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    Gillies, A

    D. Gillies, A. Banfi, A. Martin, and M. A. Lim, Dimension-8 operators in WW production via gluon fusion, JHEP06, 111, arXiv:2412.16020 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    J. M. Goldberg, H. Liu, and Y. Shadmi, Dimension-8 SMEFT contact-terms for vector-pair production via on-shell Higgsing, JHEP12, 057, arXiv:2407.07945 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    C. Hays, A. Martin, V. Sanz, and J. Setford, On the impact of dimension-eight SMEFT operators on Higgs measurements, JHEP02, 123, arXiv:1808.00442 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Assi and A

    B. Assi and A. Martin, Energy-enhanced dimension eight SMEFT effects in VBF Higgs production, JHEP02, 029, arXiv:2410.21563 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    Corbett, A

    T. Corbett, A. Martin, and M. Trott, Consistent higher orderσ(GG →h), Γ (h→ GG) and Γ(h→γγ) in geoSMEFT, JHEP12, 147, arXiv:2107.07470 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    Martin and M

    A. Martin and M. Trott,gghvariations, Phys. Rev. D105, 076004 (2022), arXiv:2109.05595 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    Corbett, The one-loop tadpole in the geoSMEFT, SciPost Phys.11, 097 (2021), arXiv:2106.10284 [hep-ph]

    T. Corbett, The one-loop tadpole in the geoSMEFT, SciPost Phys.11, 097 (2021), arXiv:2106.10284 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  49. [49]

    C. Hays, A. Helset, A. Martin, and M. Trott, Exact SMEFT formulation and expansion toO(v 4/Λ4), JHEP11, 087, arXiv:2007.00565 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2007

  50. [50]

    Flores-Hernandez and A

    M. Flores-Hernandez and A. Martin, Higgs decays to four leptons toO(1/Λ 4) in SMEFT, (2026), arXiv:2602.12326 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    S. Bera, D. Chakraborty, S. Chattopadhyay, and R. S. Gupta, Differential observables for the Higgs-strahlung process to all orders in EFT, (2026), arXiv:2601.08821 [hep-ph]. 20

    work page arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Corbett, A

    T. Corbett, A. Helset, A. Martin, and M. Trott, EWPD in the SMEFT to dimension eight, JHEP06, 076, arXiv:2102.02819 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    H. D. Politzer, Power Corrections at Short Distances, Nucl. Phys.B172, 349 (1980)

    work page 1980

  54. [54]

    Georgi, On-shell effective field theory, Nucl

    H. Georgi, On-shell effective field theory, Nucl. Phys.B361, 339 (1991)

    work page 1991

  55. [55]

    Reduced Effective Lagrangians

    C. Arzt, Reduced effective Lagrangians, Phys. Lett.B342, 189 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9304230 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  56. [56]

    Simma, Equations of motion for effective Lagrangians and penguins in rare B decays, Z

    H. Simma, Equations of motion for effective Lagrangians and penguins in rare B decays, Z. Phys.C61, 67 (1994), arXiv:hep- ph/9307274 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 1994

  57. [57]

    Higgs ultraviolet softening

    I. Brivio, O. J. P. ´Eboli, M. B. Gavela, M. C. Gonz´ alez-Garcia, L. Merlo, and S. Rigolin, Higgs ultraviolet softening, JHEP 12, 004, arXiv:1405.5412 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    J. D. Wells and Z. Zhang, Effective theories of universal theories, JHEP01, 123, arXiv:1510.08462 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    Corbett, J

    T. Corbett, J. Desai, O. J. P. Eboli, and M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Dimension-eight operator basis for universal standard model effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D110, 033003 (2024), arXiv:2404.03720 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Madigan, Can PDFs absorb new physics?, PoSEPS-HEP2023, 479 (2024)

    M. Madigan, Can PDFs absorb new physics?, PoSEPS-HEP2023, 479 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Hammou, Z

    E. Hammou, Z. Kassabov, M. Madigan, M. L. Mangano, L. Mantani, J. Moore, M. M. Alvarado, and M. Ubiali, Hide and seek: how PDFs can conceal new physics, JHEP11, 090, arXiv:2307.10370 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    Fuentes-Mart´ ın, M

    J. Fuentes-Mart´ ın, M. K¨ onig, J. Pag` es, A. E. Thomsen, and F. Wilsch, A proof of concept for matchete: an automated tool for matching effective theories, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 662 (2023), arXiv:2212.04510 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    How to use the Standard Model effective field theory

    B. Henning, X. Lu, and H. Murayama, How to use the Standard Model effective field theory, JHEP01, 023, arXiv:1412.1837 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    J. C. Criado and M. P´ erez-Victoria, Field redefinitions in effective theories at higher orders, JHEP03, 038, arXiv:1811.09413 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  65. [65]

    C. W. Murphy, Dimension-8 operators in the Standard Model Eective Field Theory, JHEP10, 174, arXiv:2005.00059 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2005

  66. [66]

    Energy helps accuracy: electroweak precision tests at hadron colliders

    M. Farina, G. Panico, D. Pappadopulo, J. T. Ruderman, R. Torre, and A. Wulzer, Energy helps accuracy: electroweak precision tests at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B772, 210 (2017), arXiv:1609.08157 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  67. [67]

    Frederix, S

    R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, D. Pagani, H. S. Shao, and M. Zaro, The automation of next-to-leading order elec- troweak calculations, JHEP07, 185, arXiv:1804.10017 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  68. [68]

    N. D. Christensen and C. Duhr, FeynRules - Feynman rules made easy, Comput. Phys. Commun.180, 1614 (2009), arXiv:0806.4194 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  69. [69]

    FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology

    A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun.185, 2250 (2014), arXiv:1310.1921 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  70. [70]

    A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1

    T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun.178, 852 (2008), arXiv:0710.3820 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  71. [71]

    DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment

    J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaitre, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi (DELPHES 3), DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP02, 057, arXiv:1307.6346 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [72]

    FastJet user manual

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, FastJet User Manual, Eur. Phys. J. C72, 1896 (2012), arXiv:1111.6097 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  73. [73]

    Bierlichet al., Robust Independent Validation of Experiment and Theory: Rivet version 3, SciPost Phys.8, 026 (2020), arXiv:1912.05451 [hep-ph]

    C. Bierlichet al., Robust Independent Validation of Experiment and Theory: Rivet version 3, SciPost Phys.8, 026 (2020), arXiv:1912.05451 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    Buckley, D

    A. Buckley, D. Kar, and K. Nordstr¨ om, Fast simulation of detector effects in Rivet, SciPost Phys.8, 025 (2020), arXiv:1910.01637 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  75. [75]

    Prospects for searches for heavyZ ′ andW ′ bosons in fermionic final states with the ATLAS experiment at the HL-LHC, (2018)

    work page 2018

  76. [76]

    Prospect for a measurement of the Weak Mixing Angle inpp→Z/γ ∗ →e +e− events with the ATLAS detector at the High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider, (2018)

    work page 2018

  77. [77]

    Schaelet al.(SLD Electroweak Group, DELPHI, ALEPH, SLD, SLD Heavy Flavour Group, OPAL, LEP Electroweak Working Group, L3), Precision electroweak measurements on theZresonance, Phys

    S. Schaelet al.(SLD Electroweak Group, DELPHI, ALEPH, SLD, SLD Heavy Flavour Group, OPAL, LEP Electroweak Working Group, L3), Precision electroweak measurements on theZresonance, Phys. Rept.427, 257 (2006), arXiv:hep- ex/0509008 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2006

  78. [78]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  79. [79]

    de Blas, M

    J. de Blas, M. Pierini, L. Reina, and L. Silvestrini, Impact of the Recent Measurements of the Top-Quark and W-Boson Masses on Electroweak Precision Fits, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 271801 (2022), arXiv:2204.04204 [hep-ph]. 21 Appendix A: Effective interactions entering our analyses There are six dimension-six and eleven dimension-eight operators entering the D...

    work page arXiv 2022