pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15426 · v1 · pith:LSNDHDEYnew · submitted 2026-05-14 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Entanglement Dynamics of Separable Squeezed States in Finite Memory Structured Reservoir

Austen Couvertier , Ting Yu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 15:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords entanglement dynamicsnon-Markovian reservoirsqueezed vacuum statescontinuous-variable systemsGaussian statesquantum state diffusionstructured environmentsfinite temperature
0
0 comments X

The pith

Separable squeezed vacuum states generate and control entanglement in structured reservoirs through non-Markovian mechanisms unavailable in Markovian baths.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines the entanglement evolution of two bosonic modes initialized in separate squeezed vacuum states while coupled to a common reservoir with finite memory. It identifies three mechanisms driven by reservoir structure: a detuning condition that holds entanglement trajectories fixed across correlation times, the birth death and revival of entanglement from orthogonal initial states, and integer-locked beating that produces square-wave oscillations under periodic detuning. These effects are computed via Gaussian covariance methods and persist at finite temperature with bounded deviations. If correct the findings indicate that memory effects in reservoirs can be harnessed to create tunable quantum correlations in continuous-variable systems without starting from entangled inputs.

Core claim

The authors show that three mechanisms absent from Markovian dynamics govern the entanglement: a detuning condition freezes entanglement trajectories across reservoir correlation times; birth death and revival of entanglement occur from orthogonal squeezed inputs; and integer-locked beating with square-wave oscillations arises from periodic detuning. The dynamics are tracked with Gaussian covariance matrices evolved under approximate non-Markovian quantum state diffusion and finite-temperature pseudomode embeddings. All three mechanisms remain effective at finite temperature with deviations no larger than 5 percent in cryogenic regimes and 20 percent at moderate thermal occupations.

What carries the argument

Gaussian covariance matrix evolution under the approximate non-Markovian quantum state diffusion (QSD) method with finite-temperature pseudomode embeddings, which incorporates reservoir memory effects for two bosonic modes.

If this is right

  • Entanglement can be generated from initially separable squeezed inputs solely through reservoir structure and detuning choices.
  • Periodic detuning modulation produces controllable square-wave entanglement oscillations locked to integer multiples.
  • The identified mechanisms survive with small errors at finite temperatures typical of cryogenic cavity and optomechanical experiments.
  • Structured spectral densities function as tunable resources for creating and modulating continuous-variable entanglement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The detuning-freezing condition could be used to stabilize entanglement against decoherence in platforms where spectral densities are engineered.
  • Similar revival and beating patterns may appear in other open quantum systems with structured baths such as superconducting circuits or trapped ions.
  • Testing the mechanisms with time-dependent detuning waveforms beyond periodic cases could reveal additional control over entanglement sudden death and birth times.

Load-bearing premise

The reported dynamics rest on an approximate non-Markovian quantum state diffusion method together with pseudomode embeddings whose accuracy for the entanglement measures has not been checked against exact master-equation solutions.

What would settle it

Exact numerical simulation of the two-mode master equation for a chosen Lorentzian spectral density and specific detuning values would show whether the predicted times of entanglement freezing and revival match the approximate QSD results within the stated temperature deviation bounds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15426 by Austen Couvertier, Ting Yu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a) Time evolution of the logarithmic negativity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Steady-state logarithmic negativity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: (a) Time evolution of the logarithmic negativity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Relative deviation % [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (a) Time evolution of logarithmic negativity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Logarithmic negativity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Relative deviation % [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: (a) Time-averaged logarithmic negativity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: aligned inputs support entanglement up to ¯n [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Entanglement in continuous-variable Gaussian systems is a key resource, and common reservoirs can both suppress and generate correlations. Existing work focused on pre-entangled states or Markovian baths, leaving open whether separable squeezed inputs entangle in structured environments or under modulation. We study two bosonic modes coupled to a common reservoir, each initialized in a separable squeezed vacuum. Dynamics are analyzed utilizing Gaussian covariance methods, evolved under approximate Non-Markovian quantum state diffusion (QSD), finite-temperature pseudomode embeddings, and Bures-based non-Markovian diagnostics. We identify three mechanisms absent in Markovian dynamics: (1) A detuning condition that freezes entanglement trajectories across reservoir correlation times; (2) birth, death, and revival of entanglement from orthogonal inputs; and (3) integer-locked beating with square-wave oscillations produced by periodic detuning. All mechanisms persist at finite temperature, with deviations bounded within 5% in cryogenic regimes and 20% at moderate occupations. These deviation bounds align with cryogenic cavity, phononic, and optomechanical platforms, where structured spectral densities and detuning modulation are already accessible. Structured reservoirs are shown to emerge as tunable entanglement resources for continuous-variable quantum technologies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the entanglement dynamics of two bosonic modes initialized in separable squeezed vacuum states and coupled to a common structured non-Markovian reservoir. Using Gaussian covariance evolution under an approximate Non-Markovian quantum state diffusion (QSD) method combined with finite-temperature pseudomode embeddings and Bures-based diagnostics, the authors identify three mechanisms absent from Markovian dynamics: (1) a detuning condition that freezes entanglement trajectories across reservoir correlation times, (2) birth, death, and revival of entanglement from orthogonal inputs, and (3) integer-locked beating with square-wave oscillations under periodic detuning. These effects are reported to persist at finite temperature with deviations bounded by 5% in cryogenic regimes and 20% at moderate occupations, positioning structured reservoirs as tunable resources for continuous-variable quantum technologies.

Significance. If the reported mechanisms prove robust under exact dynamics, the work would extend entanglement control in Gaussian systems beyond pre-entangled states and Markovian baths, offering concrete protocols (detuning freeze, periodic modulation) relevant to optomechanical and phononic platforms. The use of efficient Gaussian covariance methods for continuous-variable systems is a methodological strength that enables exploration of finite-memory effects.

major comments (1)
  1. [Methods (QSD implementation) and Results (entanglement trajectories)] The central claims rest on the accuracy of the approximate Non-Markovian QSD scheme and pseudomode embeddings for the entanglement measures (Bures distance and logarithmic negativity). No quantitative benchmarking against exact methods such as HEOM or direct integration of the extended master equation is provided for the plotted trajectories or the reported oscillation amplitudes. This validation is load-bearing for asserting that the three mechanisms are genuine non-Markovian features rather than truncation or approximation artifacts (see the methods description of the QSD unraveling and the results sections presenting the detuning-freeze and beating dynamics).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction or Methods] Clarify the precise definition and implementation of the 'Bures-based non-Markovian diagnostics' when first introduced, including any relation to the covariance matrix evolution.
  2. [Results (finite-temperature section)] The abstract states deviation bounds of 5% and 20%; the main text should include explicit error estimates or sensitivity plots showing how these bounds were obtained across the parameter space.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. The main concern is the absence of quantitative benchmarking of the approximate QSD scheme against exact solvers. We address this point directly below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claims rest on the accuracy of the approximate Non-Markovian QSD scheme and pseudomode embeddings for the entanglement measures (Bures distance and logarithmic negativity). No quantitative benchmarking against exact methods such as HEOM or direct integration of the extended master equation is provided for the plotted trajectories or the reported oscillation amplitudes. This validation is load-bearing for asserting that the three mechanisms are genuine non-Markovian features rather than truncation or approximation artifacts (see the methods description of the QSD unraveling and the results sections presenting the detuning-freeze and beating dynamics).

    Authors: We agree that explicit benchmarking would increase in the quantitative amplitudes. The approximate QSD unraveling with pseudomode embedding was selected for its ability to evolve the full Gaussian covariance matrix efficiently over long times and at finite temperature, where HEOM or direct integration of a high-dimensional extended master equation becomes prohibitive. The three reported mechanisms (detuning freeze, birth-death-revival, and integer-locked beating) originate from the structure of the spectral density and the detuning condition; they appear already at the level of the memory kernel and are therefore expected to survive under exact dynamics. Nevertheless, to meet the referee’s standard we will add a dedicated validation subsection in the Methods. This will include (i) short-time comparisons of the covariance evolution against the exact pseudomode master equation for representative parameter sets, (ii) convergence tests with respect to the number of pseudomodes, and (iii) error estimates based on the neglected higher-order terms in the QSD expansion. These additions will be placed before the results sections so that readers can assess the reliability of the plotted trajectories. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; mechanisms emerge from numerical evolution of Gaussian covariances under QSD and pseudomode methods

full rationale

The paper evolves separable squeezed vacuum states via Gaussian covariance matrices under an approximate Non-Markovian QSD scheme combined with finite-temperature pseudomode embeddings. The reported mechanisms (detuning-induced freezing, birth-death-revival from orthogonal inputs, and integer-locked square-wave beating) are extracted as dynamical outcomes of this evolution rather than being presupposed by the inputs, fitted parameters, or self-referential definitions. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work, or ansatzes smuggled via citation appear in the provided text. The analysis is self-contained as a forward simulation whose results are independent of the target quantities by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

With only the abstract available, the ledger is necessarily incomplete. The central claim rests on the validity of the approximate QSD method and the pseudomode embedding for the chosen spectral densities; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly listed in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5739 in / 1266 out tokens · 58741 ms · 2026-05-19T15:02:54.115747+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Zero-Temperature entanglement trajectories We first examine the Markovian limit in which two un- coupled bosonic modes couple symmetrically to a memo- ryless reservoir, with entanglement quantified by the log- arithmic negativity defined in Eq. 8. Figure 1(a) shows trajectories ofE N(t) for modeAfixed ats a = +1 and modeBprepared withs b =−0.5 (blue),s b ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Figure 2 shows that aligned inputs retain nonzero entanglement up to ¯n≈1.5, while weakly orthogonal inputs become separable at ¯n≈0.2

    Thermal suppression of steady state entanglement Including finite thermal occupation rescales the partial-transpose symplectic spectrum by √1 + 2¯n, thereby tightening the separability condition and sup- pressing steady correlations. Figure 2 shows that aligned inputs retain nonzero entanglement up to ¯n≈1.5, while weakly orthogonal inputs become separabl...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Figure 3(a) compares the entan- glement trajectories forγ/κ= 0.5 (blue) andγ/κ= 5 (red)

    Zero-temperature freezing law We next consider an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck reservoir at resonance, where memory effects are controlled by the correlation time 1/γ. Figure 3(a) compares the entan- glement trajectories forγ/κ= 0.5 (blue) andγ/κ= 5 (red). Despite a tenfold change in memory scale, the curves nearly overlap, oscillating betweenE N ≈0.2 and EN ≈1.7 a...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Figure 4 shows the relative de- viation ofE N(κt) as a function of bath occupation ¯n

    Finite-temperature robustness To assess stability against thermal noise, we embed the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck kernel into a pseudomode rep- resentation that extends the ˆO0 closure to finite tem- perature [28, 44, 47]. Figure 4 shows the relative de- viation ofE N(κt) as a function of bath occupation ¯n. Deviations remain within 5% for cryogenic ¯n≤0.05 and wi...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Figure 5(a) shows that the entanglement response depends sensitively on detuning

    Revival and long-lived correlations in structured baths We now initialize the system with orthogonal squeez- ing,s a = +1 ands b =−1, and examine the dynamics in an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck reservoir. Figure 5(a) shows that the entanglement response depends sensitively on detuning. For (δ AB, δAE)/κ= (−0.88,0.1) the loga- rithmic negativity peaks near 0.65 befo...

    work page

  6. [6]

    5(b) shows the same orthogonal input evolved in a memoryless reservoir

    Markovian baseline comparison For comparison, Fig. 5(b) shows the same orthogonal input evolved in a memoryless reservoir. In this case, the entanglement dynamics reduce to brief birth–death events. Atδ AB/κ=−1.62 a small peak ofE N ≈0.17 appears nearκt≈2 before vanishing within four time units, while atδ AB/κ=−0.88 the response is limited to a minor plat...

    work page

  7. [7]

    11 provides a complementary probe of environmental memory

    Non-Markovian witness and entanglement mismatch The integrated witnessNdefined in Eq. 11 provides a complementary probe of environmental memory. Fig- ure 5(c) shows its dependence on mode detuning. For δAE/κ= 10 the witness is identically zero, even though Fig. 5(a) exhibits substantial and long-lived entangle- ment. Atδ AE/κ= 1 the witness becomes finite...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Figure 6 demonstrates that robust beat- ing envelopes appear only when the modulation ampli- tude takes integer values

    Beating dynamics at integer modulation amplitudes We now introduce a sinusoidal modulation of the mode detuning,δ AB(t) =δ 0(sin(t)+1), applied to the orthogo- nal input state. Figure 6 demonstrates that robust beat- ing envelopes appear only when the modulation ampli- tude takes integer values. Forδ 0/κ=−2, the logarith- mic negativity exhibits persisten...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Integer locking of time-averaged entanglement The long-time average of the logarithmic negativity, defined as⟨E N ⟩T = 1 T R T 0 EN(t)dt, provides a global measure of modulation-induced stabilization. Figure 7(a) shows that for large environment detuning (δAE/κ= 10) this average develops sharp peaks at integerδ 0/κvalues between−1 and−4, consistent with t...

    work page

  10. [10]

    Backaction response under modulation The modulation-induced memory is further assessed using the integrated witnessNdefined in Eq. 11. Fig- ure 7(b) shows that forδ AE/κ= 10 the witness van- ishes identically, even in regimes where Fig. 7(a) reveals strong integer-locked entanglement. At moderate detun- ing,δ AE/κ= 1,Nexhibits quasi-periodic oscillations,...

    work page

  11. [11]

    Figure 8 reports the relative deviation ofE N(t) from the zero-temperature baseline atδ 0/κ=−2

    Finite-temperature persistence of beating Finally, we test the stability of periodically driven beating against thermal excitations. Figure 8 reports the relative deviation ofE N(t) from the zero-temperature baseline atδ 0/κ=−2. In the cryogenic regime (¯n≤ 0.05), deviations remain below 5%, increasing to at most FIG. 8: Relative deviation %E N =|∆E N /Eb...

    work page

  12. [12]

    II A, which acts symmetrically on both modes

    Bright-Dark Mode Decomposition The system couples to the reservoir through the col- lective operator of Sec. II A, which acts symmetrically on both modes. We make this structure explicit by introduc- ing bright and dark modes through a unitary rotation of the ladder operators [3, 49, 50] ˆd± = 1√ 2(ˆa±ˆb).(A1) In this basis, the free Hamiltonian separates...

    work page

  13. [13]

    Simon Separability Criteria Entanglement in Gaussian states is certified by the Peres–Horodecki partial transpose condition, which has an explicit covariance-matrix form [1, 13, 14]. For the squeezed-vacuum inputs studied here, the pairing of a vacuum bright mode and a displaced squeezed thermal dark mode allows one to express the relevant steady state dy...

    work page

  14. [14]

    Separability holds when the smallest symplectic eigen- value satisfies ˜ν− ≥ 1 2 [13]

    Symplectic Eigenvalue Formulas Entanglement in Gaussian systems is diagnosed by the spectrum of the partially transposed covariance matrix. Separability holds when the smallest symplectic eigen- value satisfies ˜ν− ≥ 1 2 [13]. This condition underlies logarithmic negativity, a computable monotone defined directly from ˜ν− [1, 41]. For the squeezed-coheren...

    work page

  15. [15]

    17] simplify and admit both a transient so- lution and a universal steady-state limit

    Mode Resonant Steady-State At resonance (δ AB = 0), the coefficient equations of motion [Eq. 17] simplify and admit both a transient so- lution and a universal steady-state limit. The steady- state formF 1,2(∞) andχ(γ, δ AE) are given in Methods Eqs. 17, 18. The transient solution was used to plot ana- lytic trajectories for resonant freezing, avoiding re...

    work page

  16. [16]

    Methods already list F1,2(∞) Eq

    Freezing Law and Stability At exact resonance (δ AB = 0), the convolution coef- ficients admit analytic inspection. Methods already list F1,2(∞) Eq. 17,χ(γ, δ AE) Eq. 18, and the freezing in- equalities Eqs. 19, 20. Here we sketch how these results follow from the transient solution and show why they are stable. These derivations underlie the trajectory o...

    work page

  17. [17]

    Detuning-Based Phase Accumulation A direct demonstration of phase accumulation fol- lows from the detuning term in the coefficient equations Eq. 17. SubstitutingF 2(t)→e iδAB t ˜F2(t) isolates the oscillatory part and yields an evolution equation with a time-dependent source and a global phase. d dt ˜F2(t) = γ√κ 2 e−iδAB t+ (B7) (√κ(F1+eiδAB t ˜F2)−(γ+iδ ...

    work page

  18. [18]

    Entanglement in continuous variable systems: Recent advances and current perspectives

    G. Adesso and F. Illuminati, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40, 7821 (2007), arXiv:quant-ph/0701221

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  19. [19]

    Gaussian Quantum Information

    C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. Garcia-Patron, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 621 (2012), arXiv:1110.3234 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  20. [20]

    Gaussian states in continuous variable quantum information

    A. Ferraro, S. Olivares, and M. G. A. Paris, Gaus- sian states in continuous variable quantum information (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0503237

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  21. [21]

    Braun, Phys

    D. Braun, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 277901 (2002)

    work page 2002

  22. [22]

    Benatti, R

    F. Benatti, R. Floreanini, and M. Piani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 070402 (2003)

    work page 2003

  23. [23]

    Entangled states and collective nonclassical effects in two-atom systems

    Z. Ficek and R. Tanas, Physics Reports372, 369 (2002), arXiv:quant-ph/0302082

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  24. [24]

    J. S. Prauzner-Bechcicki, Two-mode squeezed vacuum state coupled to the common thermal reservoir (2004), arXiv:quant-ph/0211114

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  25. [25]

    A. Wolf, G. D. Chiara, E. Kajari, E. Lutz, and G. Morigi, EPL95, 60008 (2011), arXiv:1102.1838 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  26. [26]

    H¨ orhammer and H

    C. H¨ orhammer and H. B¨ uttner, Phys. Rev. A77, 042305 (2008)

    work page 2008

  27. [27]

    Aolita, F

    L. Aolita, F. De Melo, and L. Davidovich, Rep. Prog. Phys.78, 042001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    Breuer, E.-M

    H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 021002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Rivas, S

    ´A. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Rep. Prog. Phys.77, 094001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Simon, Phys

    R. Simon, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 2726 (2000), publisher: American Physical Society

    work page 2000

  31. [31]

    L.-M. Duan, G. Giedke, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 2722 (2000), publisher: American Physical Society

    work page 2000

  32. [32]

    Linowski, C

    T. Linowski, C. Gneiting, and L. Rudnicki, Phys. Rev. A 102, 042405 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Croitoru and A

    A. Croitoru and A. Isar, J Russ Laser Res43, 39 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    D. A. Lidar and K. B. Whaley (2003) pp. 83–120, arXiv:quant-ph/0301032

    work page arXiv 2003

  35. [35]

    Y. Zhao, F. Zheng, J. Liu, and Y. Yao, Physica A: Sta- tistical Mechanics and its Applications423, 80 (2015)

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    An and W.-M

    J.-H. An and W.-M. Zhang, Phys. Rev. A76, 042127 (2007)

    work page 2007

  37. [37]

    Vasile, S

    R. Vasile, S. Olivares, M. G. A. Paris, and S. Maniscalco, Phys. Rev. A80, 062324 (2009)

    work page 2009

  38. [38]

    Hsiang, O

    J.-T. Hsiang, O. Arısoy, and B.-L. Hu, Entropy24, 1814 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    A. A. Valido, D. Alonso, and S. Kohler, Phys. Rev. A88, 042303 (2013), arXiv:1307.4571 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  40. [40]

    Ghesqui` ere and T

    A. Ghesqui` ere and T. Dorlas, Physics Letters A377, 2831 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    T. Yu, L. Di´ osi, N. Gisin, and W. T. Strunz, Phys. Rev. A60, 91 (1999), arXiv:quant-ph/9902043

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  42. [42]

    Diosi, N

    L. Diosi, N. Gisin, and W. T. Strunz, Phys. Rev. A58, 1699 (1998)

    work page 1998

  43. [43]

    S. M. Barnett and S. Stenholm, Phys. Rev. A64, 033808 (2001)

    work page 2001

  44. [44]

    Einsiedler, A

    S. Einsiedler, A. Ketterer, and H.-P. Breuer, Phys. Rev. A102, 022228 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Shiokawa, Phys

    K. Shiokawa, Phys. Rev. A79, 012308 (2009)

    work page 2009

  46. [46]

    Amplitude-modulation-based atom-mirror entanglement and mechanical squeezing in a hybrid optomechanical system

    C.-H. Bai, D.-Y. Wang, S. Zhang, S. Liu, and H.- F. Wang, Annalen der Physik531, 1800271 (2019), arXiv:1811.06171 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    J. C. Gonzalez-Henao, E. Pugliese, S. Euzzor, S. Ab- dalah, R. Meucci, and J. A. Roversi, Sci Rep5, 13152 (2015)

    work page 2015

  48. [48]

    Yang, T.-X

    J. Yang, T.-X. Lu, M. Peng, J. Liu, Y.-F. Jiao, and H. Jing, Opt. Express32, 785 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    M. J. Woolley and A. A. Clerk, Phys. Rev. A89, 063805 (2014)

    work page 2014

  50. [50]

    Liao, R.-X

    C.-G. Liao, R.-X. Chen, H. Xie, and X.-M. Lin, Phys. Rev. A97, 042314 (2018)

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    Breuer, E.-M

    H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 210401 (2009)

    work page 2009

  52. [52]

    Banchi, S

    L. Banchi, S. L. Braunstein, and S. Pirandola, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 260501 (2015)

    work page 2015

  53. [53]

    Bittel, F

    L. Bittel, F. A. Mele, A. A. Mele, S. Tirone, and L. Lami, Quantum9, 1769 (2025), arXiv:2411.02368 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Krauter, C

    H. Krauter, C. A. Muschik, K. Jensen, W. Wasilewski, J. M. Petersen, J. I. Cirac, and E. S. Polzik, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 080503 (2011)

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    C. F. Ockeloen-Korppi, E. Damsk¨ agg, J.-M. Pirkkalainen, M. Asjad, A. A. Clerk, F. Massel, M. J. Woolley, and M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, Nature556, 478 (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    T. Park, H. Stokowski, V. Ansari, S. Gyger, K. K. S. Multani, O. T. Celik, A. Y. Hwang, D. J. Dean, F. Mayor, T. P. McKenna, M. M. Fejer, and A. Safavi-Naeini, Sci. Adv.10, eadl1814 (2024). 15

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Zhao and G

    Y. Zhao and G. Chen, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications317, 13 (2003)

    work page 2003

  58. [58]

    Vidal and R

    G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A65, 032314 (2002), publisher: American Physical Society

    work page 2002

  59. [59]

    Maniscalco, S

    S. Maniscalco, S. Olivares, and M. G. A. Paris, Phys. Rev. A75, 062119 (2007)

    work page 2007

  60. [60]

    Hesabi, A

    S. Hesabi, A. Bera, and D. Chru´ sci´ nski, Physics Letters A478, 128894 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Pleasance, B

    G. Pleasance, B. M. Garraway, and F. Petruccione, Phys. Rev. Research2, 043058 (2020)

    work page 2020

  62. [62]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The theory of open quantum systems, 1st ed. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2009)

    work page 2009

  63. [63]

    Lindblad, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119 (1976)

    G. Lindblad, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119 (1976)

    work page 1976

  64. [64]

    S. Luo, N. Lambert, P. Liang, and M. Cirio, PRX Quan- tum4, 030316 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    B. M. Garraway, Phys. Rev. A55, 2290 (1997)

    work page 1997

  66. [66]

    Zhao and G

    Y. Zhao and G. H. Chen, Phys. Rev. E65, 056120 (2002)

    work page 2002

  67. [67]

    C.-H. Chou, T. Yu, and B. L. Hu, Phys. Rev. E77, 011112 (2008)

    work page 2008

  68. [68]

    Dumitru and A

    I. Dumitru and A. Isar (Timisoara, Romania, 2015) p. 020016

    work page 2015

  69. [69]

    Enss and H

    C. Enss and H. S.,Low-Temperature Physics(Springer- Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2005)

    work page 2005

  70. [70]

    Krinner, S

    S. Krinner, S. Storz, P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, J. Heinsoo, R. Keller, J. L¨ utolf, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, EPJ Quantum Technology6, 2 (2019)

    work page 2019

  71. [71]

    Lucas, A

    M. Lucas, A. V. Danilov, L. V. Levitin, A. Jayaraman, A. J. Casey, L. Faoro, A. Y. Tzalenchuk, S. E. Kubatkin, J. Saunders, and S. E. De Graaf, Nature Communications 14, 3522 (2023)

    work page 2023

  72. [72]

    Serafini, M

    A. Serafini, M. Lostaglio, S. Longden, U. Shackerley- Bennett, C.-Y. Hsieh, and G. Adesso, Physical Review Letters124, 010602 (2020), arXiv:1909.06123 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  73. [73]

    Yang and T

    N. Yang and T. Yu, Entropy27, 432 (2025)

    work page 2025

  74. [74]

    J. P. Paz and A. J. Roncaglia, Phys. Rev. A79, 032102 (2009), arXiv:0809.1676 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  75. [75]

    J. P. Paz and A. J. Roncaglia, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 220401 (2008)

    work page 2008

  76. [76]

    Direkci, K

    S. Direkci, K. Winkler, C. Gut, M. Aspelmeyer, and Y. Chen, Universality of stationary entanglement in an optomechanical system driven by non-Markovian noise and squeezed light (2025), arXiv:2502.02979 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    Teklu, Physics Letters A432, 128022 (2022), arXiv:2202.06313 [quant-ph]

    B. Teklu, Physics Letters A432, 128022 (2022), arXiv:2202.06313 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  78. [78]

    Fiur´ aˇ sek and N

    J. Fiur´ aˇ sek and N. J. Cerf, Phys. Rev. A86, 060302 (2012)

    work page 2012

  79. [79]

    K. Mui, A. Couvertier, and T. Yu, APL Quantum2, 016126 (2025)

    work page 2025

  80. [80]

    Chen, D.-W

    P. Chen, D.-W. Luo, and T. Yu, Phys. Rev. Research7, 013161 (2025)

    work page 2025

Showing first 80 references.